To all idiots blaming the pilot. This is a cable snap most probably, and not the crew forgetting to activate the brake cable because you see the plane decelarating after it got the cable, and it almost stopped at the end so the pilot couldn't take off.
@Loopyerest I'd want to see you start/land a jet, let alone rescue yourself because groundcrew forgot to activate the brake-mechanism of the cable... Know what you're seeing before you start judging.
That's why you always go full throttle arrester hook down when landing on an aircraft carrier, incase you miss the cable or it snaps, you can take off again, Amateur !
@soucorp You only go full throttle in case you miss the cable. If the cable snaps, you're fucked full throttle or not. And it sounded to me like he was going full throttle, anyway.
@514Productions take a better look. this IS a russian aircraft. its a sukhoi su-27. plus the end of the run way/ take off portion of the flight deck banks up like a jump... U.S. air craft carriers havent been designed like that since WW2. (plus the small russian flag on the closer of the two verticle stabilizers is a bit of a give away)
I just saw the same video... only this time it's 80 million, the last one was 60 million, for heavens sake, it only cost around 25 million US dollars.
@alexini5 Firstly, the pilot didn't catch the arrest cable, his fault. Secondly pilot training clearly states that you burn hard on landing. This means that if you miss the cable, you can go around. This pilot didn't do that and powered down, and as a result, crashed. The crew as far as I can see, did their job perfectly and are not to blame.
@viva0la0life It's obvious he was burning hard. He caught something - how do you think he slowed down so fast. Then something snapped, full power he went off.
@k2477456 he's right dude your mistaken.. the f22 JSF, alomg with the migs and sukhois all use the Zvezda K-36DM.. or a derivative of.. i bet you feel like a right idiot now huh?
@k2477456 no the martin baker ejection seats have not been used in the 4th generation fighter jets.. both the russians and the american 4th gen jets now use the russian ejector seat..
Nothing to do with the brake... Arrester failure occurs (lamest terms cable snaps)... Due to the procedure of full reheat on carrier landings, the thrust of the engines, rolled the SU-33 forward..
Nothing could have gone better for the pilot really.. He did all he could..
Thanks for the info man, I couldn't get a good look at it in the video. I was also pretty tired when I wrote that message; Raptors and my love for the earlier F series jets have absolutely nothing to do with a Russian plane accident...
@D1vid3By0 Its easy, the su33 is only Sukhoi to land on carriers.. I know this from Lock On 2, if your into your plains.. You should get it.. Check my vids to see..
BTW, the second plane isn't being catapulted for take-off. They catapult them off the front where it's sloped-up like a "jump". They don't launch jets from the landing-area. There are no catapults back there. He is making a go-around after missing his landing. You can tell because the arresting hook is lowered. They don't launch with the arresting hook down. Whatever flew into the water might have something to do with why he didn't make a successful landing.
This isn't pilot error. He was at full-throttle after hitting the wire. (Which is what he's supposed to do in-case he doesn't catch the wire.) It's very hard to tell exactly what happened because it's such low-resolution. Most-likely the cable broke, or the braking system of the cable failed. The cable system slowed him just enough, that he couldn't take-off again after it failed.
@SummitTwelve I can smell a troll from a mile away, but I'll play anyway. I know it's not a US aircraft because I am VERY familiar with US military aircraft. I was a Crew Chief (Aircraft mechanic) in the US military. The US Navy doesn't use Su-30's. The Su-30 is a Russian-built plane. By the look of the emblem on the tail (hard to see), it appears to be owned by the Indian Navy, who has been buying Su-30s from Russia.
Also, the US doesn't use carriers with a ramp on the front.
@SummitTwelve Sorry, didn't mean to offend. I guess my troll-dar is broken. I forgot that not everyone is an aviation-buff. What seems like common-knowlege to me isn't for everyone else. Like I said, sorry if I offended you. Glad I could answer your question though. :)
@sydneyACE Well then as a military man you should know that the indian navy operates mig 29's and not the su-30's.. Also the russian carrier that the mig 29's will be stationed on has yet to deliverd to the indian navy, This is obviously old russian footage :)
@shatuldurlabhji My personal military experience wouldn't tell me much of anything about foreign military aircraft, except when the're NOT US. I knew for SURE that it wasn't a US aircraft because it's a Sukhoi, and those are made in Russia. I don't think it's a Russian-owned jet however because there are no red stars on-it anywhere. Russian-owned Sukhois have red stars on the tails and wings. I don't see Russian insignia on this one.
@shatuldurlabhji I thought at-first it was Indian, but after further investigation, it apears I was wrong. You're right the Indian navy doesn't fly SU-30s they fly MiG-29s. The Indian AIR FORCE flys SU-30s. I haven't been able to find any pictures of a tail that looks like this one. It apears to have a dark horizontal stripe with a light stripe above-it. It doesn't look like a Russian insignia, but it could be. Do yo have any other ideas as to what insignia that is?
80 mil? comon. Russians know how to make things Work and cheap. This was due to pilot error which CAN happen to anyone, no pilot is 100% safe, though they can always try,
@TheMRBLACKop12 LOL, i seriously admire you for your stupidity. :) which part of me looks like a communist? HAHA, seriously grow up. Ive said nothing that relates to communism. THANKS :)
NEGATIVE although crew could have forget the arrestor wire, its the pilot responsability to stay sharp on his toes be prepared and ready to apply full power a couple seconds after touch down just in case he misses the wire or the crew forget to reset the arrestor system
No, he lost four planes, one was shot down, one was destroyed in the fire on the deck of the USS Forestal, one crash was caused by an engine failure, the fourth was due to pilot error.
@TheDemonofthenite Have you seen some of the U.S. Navy carrier accidents? Carrier work is dangerous and accident prone no matter what country you are.
Duh. Due to lag of jet's spooling up, you land with throttle on in case you have to keep flying. Of course, if you don't arrest the aircraft you get, well, you see what you get.
Gotta be impressed with the Russian's 0-speed, 0-altitude ejection seat, though!
@JonkyOnTheSpot if im not mistaken both Russia and the united stated both use basicly the same Martin-Baker ejection seat in their 4th generation fighters
The second aircraft is taking off, and not a failed landing. The aircraft is using a catapult to assist take off and the item falling into the sea is the wire that secured the aircraft to the catapault system. When the aircraft leaves the deck, the wire is jettisoned and falls into the sea. There are probably loads of vids on youtube showing how this works, with the F4 Phantom being one of the easiest to see, due to its long front landing gear leg.
On landing the pilots go to full throttle incase the arrester gear hasnt caught or failed, so why didnt this plane take off as it was supposed to do, what they train for etc?
@dutch5081 Sukhoi Su-27 probably! It's like the tailhook caught but there was no resistance to it stopping, or it didn't catch onto the arresting cables well.
@platinum243125 You realize Obama is the biggest reason the debt is so bad...right? His stimulus bill is at fault for that. He has spent more money than every president before him combined. Get your facts straight before you open your mouth you imbecile
@Milleuros People are generally ignorant or stupid, sometimes both. Makes me sad to see a Flanker D take a swim though. I'd rather see a Mikoyan 29K go overboard, it would be less painful lol. Too bad we don't fly Russian airframes! I'd love to see some USAF & Navy flankers ;)
An F18 weights between 11 tonnes and 23 tonnes (depends on the load), so it sinks immediately. It's a good thing the pilot managed to eject himself; perhaps today he flies an F22 :) :)
Hey I'm pretty sure you guys have no clue what you're talking about.....
These Jets will not sink, they were designed to float. It's call Jettison. When there is a fire on a ship, the crew will push the Jets over board and pick them up later.
@chklein1771 oh so the jetsons pick up the people after they sink and die right ya and you have a clue? know anything about physics? or do you just claim to know everything?
That's a bitch. All of you watching this, and thinking that you could've done better than this highly trained pilot, guess again. Think about all the hours you spend at your job, and know that the pilot you just watched crash has spent just as many hours training to land on various surfaces, including this aircraft carrier. And yet it was still too difficult for him. We all screw up at our jobs once in a while, it just sucks more for this guy because of the price tag.
@tag7100 he hit the rope that he was supposed to. the one that catches the plane. but something must have malfunctioned with it. so chances are its not even his fault
Cable snap at about 0:03. Notice the deceleration followed by immediate acceleration? Use your eyes people.
modularbadger 10 hours ago
To all idiots blaming the pilot. This is a cable snap most probably, and not the crew forgetting to activate the brake cable because you see the plane decelarating after it got the cable, and it almost stopped at the end so the pilot couldn't take off.
ogi415 1 day ago
@wizz2000 did you mean off?
(not trying to be a douche)
MrQwerty123456789101 2 days ago
What a retard.... A million dollars flushed down the sea cause someone don't know how to take off Shake My Head...
Loopyerest 3 days ago
@Loopyerest I'd want to see you start/land a jet, let alone rescue yourself because groundcrew forgot to activate the brake-mechanism of the cable... Know what you're seeing before you start judging.
Wolfwent79 2 days ago
Su-33
Heaney5551 3 days ago
In Soviet Russia, aircraft carrier stop on YOU!
CanesFan680 4 days ago
@zzztubazzz Fuck you , you yellow bellied long legged mac daddy
ibeleaveinaliens 5 days ago
I bet Obama can come up with another way to blow 80 million in ten seconds.
ShannonVBarnett 5 days ago
Comment removed
ShannonVBarnett 5 days ago
MOTHER FUCKER
zzztubazzz 5 days ago
stupid american people
zzztubazzz 5 days ago
@zzztubazzz
This is a Russian Su-33 multirole carrier based fighter.
Not American.
Heaney5551 3 days ago
See what i mean stupid ass pilot mother fucker hope he die and all of you too mother fucker
zzztubazzz 5 days ago
"the next thing you fly will have a propeller"
joshcb7 6 days ago
burning it is faster...
burning...
zomaarbbb 6 days ago
It's actually $30 million for the Su-33. *Nerdsnort*
vengefulnoob 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is the water okay
D0MinAT0r065X 1 week ago
is the water okay
D0MinAT0r065X 1 week ago
Not pilot error, i've seen those wires snop a few times, that's why there's more than one.i guess he caught the last one!
bee4010 1 week ago
I could do that in 1 second!
forcelightning228 1 week ago
"activate brake cable" ??? wtf??? more like the arresting cable snaped....
ilovegoatsecks 1 week ago
@ilovegoatsecks lol yea, and the pilot failed to rev up the motor. It was a double failure.... well triple if you include the description lol
boombap420 1 week ago
wow now..the last vid i watched said 60 million.. u tryin to pull possum on me or somthin?
SeanBallaWaller1 1 week ago
actually the crew didnt forget cause the plane wouldnt of slowed down that much if the cord wasnt there dumbass the cord snapped
meany1023 1 week ago
OH WHEN I FIRST SAW THE NAME OF THIS VID. I THOUGHT IT MEANT SOMETHIN ELSE
SzDanielSz13 1 week ago
Yeah....I bet Kim Kardashian could blow 80 million in ten seconds too
Dirtybird284 1 week ago 43
@Dirtybird284 80 million? Men?
crash134092 1 day ago
@crash134092 Yes. It's a joke
Dirtybird284 1 day ago
That's why you always go full throttle arrester hook down when landing on an aircraft carrier, incase you miss the cable or it snaps, you can take off again, Amateur !
soucorp 1 week ago
@soucorp You only go full throttle in case you miss the cable. If the cable snaps, you're fucked full throttle or not. And it sounded to me like he was going full throttle, anyway.
DaWolf805 1 week ago
Thank the lord for zero-zero ejection seats.
Silavite 2 weeks ago
Cable snapped... happens.. Good ejection!
Hatinonthehaters 2 weeks ago 2
this plane costs 50 million dollars :3 , not 80
bernaziim 2 weeks ago
@514Productions take a better look. this IS a russian aircraft. its a sukhoi su-27. plus the end of the run way/ take off portion of the flight deck banks up like a jump... U.S. air craft carriers havent been designed like that since WW2. (plus the small russian flag on the closer of the two verticle stabilizers is a bit of a give away)
kmcdonnell83 2 weeks ago
It's a 50 million dollar jet..
fucking idiots.
hellcatdave1 2 weeks ago
@hellcatdave1
thats some nice wikipedia skills, now learn that wikipedia = full of shit 70% of the times, fucking idiot.
TuRkmEnOkaN 2 weeks ago
how to blow $80 mill in 10 seconds... giving bill gates head
The5admeets3vil 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@The5admeets3vil
Gay.
otester 2 weeks ago
funny it was only 7 seconds
jamesxz12 2 weeks ago
That pilot ejected like a boss!!!
DotsOnALine 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just saw the same video... only this time it's 80 million, the last one was 60 million, for heavens sake, it only cost around 25 million US dollars.
the119plane 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
the119plane 3 weeks ago
ummm...oops!
babylon218 3 weeks ago
He run out of ship.
2JAMMY 3 weeks ago 28
it is not pilots fault ....its crew's fault...they didn't arrest the jet....
alexini5 3 weeks ago
@alexini5 Firstly, the pilot didn't catch the arrest cable, his fault. Secondly pilot training clearly states that you burn hard on landing. This means that if you miss the cable, you can go around. This pilot didn't do that and powered down, and as a result, crashed. The crew as far as I can see, did their job perfectly and are not to blame.
viva0la0life 3 weeks ago
@viva0la0life It's obvious he was burning hard. He caught something - how do you think he slowed down so fast. Then something snapped, full power he went off.
FindReason1 2 weeks ago
some 1 is lying one video says how to waste 60 mill and this one says 80 mil
skateboy159 4 weeks ago
thats an su flanker 35
MrCarcinoma 4 weeks ago
@k2477456 he's right dude your mistaken.. the f22 JSF, alomg with the migs and sukhois all use the Zvezda K-36DM.. or a derivative of.. i bet you feel like a right idiot now huh?
stevanjackiw 4 weeks ago
@k2477456 no the martin baker ejection seats have not been used in the 4th generation fighter jets.. both the russians and the american 4th gen jets now use the russian ejector seat..
gamerbwoi 4 weeks ago
@mentalone1995 touche' old bean.. touche'..
gamerbwoi 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
NocturnusTigris 1 month ago
those are the Russians derp
mcblogger27 1 month ago
Nothing to do with the brake... Arrester failure occurs (lamest terms cable snaps)... Due to the procedure of full reheat on carrier landings, the thrust of the engines, rolled the SU-33 forward..
Nothing could have gone better for the pilot really.. He did all he could..
gamerbwoi 1 month ago
@gamerbwoi Friendly youtuber-to-youtuber correction, by "lamest terms" I believe you are referring to "layman's terms" :)
mentalone1995 4 weeks ago
I'd rather see an $80 million dollar jet get scrapped than a pilot getting killed over it.
WhiteGangster400 1 month ago
Peace out lake trout :P
SmittysTuts 1 month ago
Is that an Su-35?
I know that the F-22's we have are amazing planes but man do i love seeing the "teenage" F series jets!
D1vid3By0 1 month ago
@D1vid3By0 This is an SU-33, no vectored thrust im afraid.. F-22 are air superiority fighter jets.. SU33 are air defense..
gamerbwoi 1 month ago
@gamerbwoi
Thanks for the info man, I couldn't get a good look at it in the video. I was also pretty tired when I wrote that message; Raptors and my love for the earlier F series jets have absolutely nothing to do with a Russian plane accident...
D1vid3By0 1 month ago
@D1vid3By0 Its easy, the su33 is only Sukhoi to land on carriers.. I know this from Lock On 2, if your into your plains.. You should get it.. Check my vids to see..
gamerbwoi 1 month ago
People laugh and say FU USA thinking its one of ours, but whos the dumbass now? Its Russia, you ignorant fucks.
fadeproof18 1 month ago
@fadeproof18
You're even dumber, it's a russian plane flown by the indian navy.
downers4life 3 weeks ago
dumbasses think US is the onyl country with carriers. its a bloody russian carrier, no US carriers have that kind of flight deck.
Fishfingers232 1 month ago
@Fishfingers232 That is interesting, I just noticed the odd look on the flight deck.
Izaku425 1 month ago
you know when you fire a missle thats like 2 thousand dollars or more already
Halomaster261 1 month ago
The splash under the jet was chuck norris fighting the cracken
Waka99Ify 1 month ago
aaahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhhahahahahahhahahahahahahahaFUCK YOU U.S.A!!!!
thepersonal7 1 month ago
@thepersonal7 It's not a United States jet fuckwad. The flag is on the right vertical stabiliser. Moron.
spinbaba 1 month ago
@thepersonal7 lol it was a russian aircraft
IdidnotFartedIswear 1 month ago
thats coming out off u r pay check :D
perfektolisem 1 month ago
ill bet he has skid marks in his underpants lol
perfektolisem 1 month ago
anyone else notice the splash under the plane at 0:15
samosborne37 1 month ago
The Su-29 actually costs around 2 million to build.
slapshot1343 1 month ago
@slapshot1343 smart ass
caveman6a 1 month ago
it was actually 6 seconds
djisadj1 1 month ago
BTW, the second plane isn't being catapulted for take-off. They catapult them off the front where it's sloped-up like a "jump". They don't launch jets from the landing-area. There are no catapults back there. He is making a go-around after missing his landing. You can tell because the arresting hook is lowered. They don't launch with the arresting hook down. Whatever flew into the water might have something to do with why he didn't make a successful landing.
sydneyACE 1 month ago
This isn't pilot error. He was at full-throttle after hitting the wire. (Which is what he's supposed to do in-case he doesn't catch the wire.) It's very hard to tell exactly what happened because it's such low-resolution. Most-likely the cable broke, or the braking system of the cable failed. The cable system slowed him just enough, that he couldn't take-off again after it failed.
sydneyACE 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
phew, thanks, i needed a good way of wasting 80 million
dAntheredalien 1 month ago
Before it was 60 million...now its 80 million. You know what, lets just say that this accident is why America is in debt, hows that?
SummitTwelve 1 month ago
@SummitTwelve We could just say that, except... This is a Russian plane, not an American one.
sydneyACE 1 month ago 13
@sydneyACE And how do I know that you know that for certain
SummitTwelve 1 month ago
Comment removed
sydneyACE 1 month ago
@SummitTwelve I can smell a troll from a mile away, but I'll play anyway. I know it's not a US aircraft because I am VERY familiar with US military aircraft. I was a Crew Chief (Aircraft mechanic) in the US military. The US Navy doesn't use Su-30's. The Su-30 is a Russian-built plane. By the look of the emblem on the tail (hard to see), it appears to be owned by the Indian Navy, who has been buying Su-30s from Russia.
Also, the US doesn't use carriers with a ramp on the front.
sydneyACE 1 month ago
@sydneyACE That's great...but I'm not a troll asswipe. I geuss your so wound up even a simple question signifies a troll.
SummitTwelve 1 month ago
@SummitTwelve Sorry, didn't mean to offend. I guess my troll-dar is broken. I forgot that not everyone is an aviation-buff. What seems like common-knowlege to me isn't for everyone else. Like I said, sorry if I offended you. Glad I could answer your question though. :)
sydneyACE 1 month ago
@sydneyACE Well then as a military man you should know that the indian navy operates mig 29's and not the su-30's.. Also the russian carrier that the mig 29's will be stationed on has yet to deliverd to the indian navy, This is obviously old russian footage :)
shatuldurlabhji 1 month ago
@shatuldurlabhji My personal military experience wouldn't tell me much of anything about foreign military aircraft, except when the're NOT US. I knew for SURE that it wasn't a US aircraft because it's a Sukhoi, and those are made in Russia. I don't think it's a Russian-owned jet however because there are no red stars on-it anywhere. Russian-owned Sukhois have red stars on the tails and wings. I don't see Russian insignia on this one.
sydneyACE 1 month ago
@sydneyACE go fuck yourself faggot queerboy. LOL
13tommy1 1 month ago
@shatuldurlabhji I thought at-first it was Indian, but after further investigation, it apears I was wrong. You're right the Indian navy doesn't fly SU-30s they fly MiG-29s. The Indian AIR FORCE flys SU-30s. I haven't been able to find any pictures of a tail that looks like this one. It apears to have a dark horizontal stripe with a light stripe above-it. It doesn't look like a Russian insignia, but it could be. Do yo have any other ideas as to what insignia that is?
sydneyACE 1 month ago
@sydneyACE
>calls troll
>Still replies anyway
You're doing it wrong
downers4life 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
514Productions 2 weeks ago
@514Productions You're kidding right? This isn't even a good troll. I would say; "Good try troll!" but there's nothing good about it. LOL!
sydneyACE 2 weeks ago
@514Productions you must be trolling...
scootfd3s 2 weeks ago
the F22 however is 150mil (US) sweet aint it? the price difference
Xiia0Sn00pY 1 month ago
Unit cost 1.61 billion (US$30.59 million)[2]
Xiia0Sn00pY 1 month ago
80 mil? comon. Russians know how to make things Work and cheap. This was due to pilot error which CAN happen to anyone, no pilot is 100% safe, though they can always try,
Xiia0Sn00pY 1 month ago
i just saw the exact same video and the said 60mil what is the actual price?
MrMultimonkeysniper 1 month ago
80 million ?! c'mon its an SU
IvisibleCat 1 month ago
80 mirrion dorrar!!!
blackopsbrothers2 1 month ago
DRUNK RUSSIAN
TheMRBLACKop12 1 month ago
@TheMRBLACKop12 ur russian crap doesnt amuse anyone
Xiia0Sn00pY 1 month ago
@Xiia0Sn00pY its a joke communist
TheMRBLACKop12 1 month ago
@TheMRBLACKop12 LOL, i seriously admire you for your stupidity. :) which part of me looks like a communist? HAHA, seriously grow up. Ive said nothing that relates to communism. THANKS :)
Xiia0Sn00pY 1 month ago
NEGATIVE although crew could have forget the arrestor wire, its the pilot responsability to stay sharp on his toes be prepared and ready to apply full power a couple seconds after touch down just in case he misses the wire or the crew forget to reset the arrestor system
stealhty1 1 month ago
Flanker F doesn't cost 80 million. It's quite a bit less than that.
baronofhawkland 2 months ago
@wizz2000 more like "How to blow 80 million in 8 seconds"
EverythinMsk19 2 months ago
pilot has some sharp reflexes with that eject, pro
BakedCd 2 months ago
80 million? rubles I guess...
TheTomyossarian 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
John McCain did the same thing five times.
FLICKtheUSA 2 months ago 30
@FLICKtheUSA
No, he lost four planes, one was shot down, one was destroyed in the fire on the deck of the USS Forestal, one crash was caused by an engine failure, the fourth was due to pilot error.
RetSquid 1 month ago
Comment removed
tfsalnave1 2 months ago
Leave the carrier stuff to the experts- Americans
TheDemonofthenite 3 months ago
@TheDemonofthenite Have you seen some of the U.S. Navy carrier accidents? Carrier work is dangerous and accident prone no matter what country you are.
dimesach 2 months ago
@dimesach Yes i know it was a joke dimesach...
TheDemonofthenite 2 months ago
@TheDemonofthenite except royal navy is #1...
somerandomutewb 2 months ago
commies are just bad at carrier stuff
ultrajn25 3 months ago
Duh. Due to lag of jet's spooling up, you land with throttle on in case you have to keep flying. Of course, if you don't arrest the aircraft you get, well, you see what you get.
Gotta be impressed with the Russian's 0-speed, 0-altitude ejection seat, though!
JonkyOnTheSpot 3 months ago 35
@JonkyOnTheSpot Every new ejection seat these days is 0/0... Not that impressive, but definitely nice to have.
skipplet 2 months ago
@JonkyOnTheSpot Well the russians do have the best ejector seat in the world..
gamerbwoi 1 month ago
@JonkyOnTheSpot He caught the wire, but it snapped.
DAZEonPC 1 month ago
@JonkyOnTheSpot if im not mistaken both Russia and the united stated both use basicly the same Martin-Baker ejection seat in their 4th generation fighters
k2477456 1 month ago
@CommonRaven
yeah, and I forgot ... you can get the box set that includes Phil Gramm
00Billy 3 months ago
That jet costs more then the Blackbird?
SCHIZOPHRENlC 3 months ago
@SCHIZOPHRENlC Probably, the F-22 costs over 160 Million.
tjohn6041 3 months ago
What dropped in the water after the second failed landing?
Puckgrinder85 3 months ago
@Puckgrinder85
The second aircraft is taking off, and not a failed landing. The aircraft is using a catapult to assist take off and the item falling into the sea is the wire that secured the aircraft to the catapault system. When the aircraft leaves the deck, the wire is jettisoned and falls into the sea. There are probably loads of vids on youtube showing how this works, with the F4 Phantom being one of the easiest to see, due to its long front landing gear leg.
raynkar 3 months ago
On landing the pilots go to full throttle incase the arrester gear hasnt caught or failed, so why didnt this plane take off as it was supposed to do, what they train for etc?
mainman2999 3 months ago
FAIL! We can all be assured that his head was chopped off that evening.
iiBetrayforAR 3 months ago
If Chuck Norris was flying that he would have jumped out and stopped it going over the end!
moleman1961 3 months ago
i wouldnt give a shit about the plane if i survive ^^
75426168 3 months ago
i couldnt see very well but its either an SU or a MIG its no i repeat its NOT an US aircraft
dutch5081 3 months ago
@dutch5081 Sukhoi Su-27 probably! It's like the tailhook caught but there was no resistance to it stopping, or it didn't catch onto the arresting cables well.
coloredCYANIDE 3 months ago
not including cost of parachute
722wdblazer 3 months ago
Or, you can a republican president, and blow 14 trillion in under 8 years!
platinum243125 4 months ago
@platinum243125 You realize Obama is the biggest reason the debt is so bad...right? His stimulus bill is at fault for that. He has spent more money than every president before him combined. Get your facts straight before you open your mouth you imbecile
armyaviationproud 3 months ago
@armyaviationproud
clinton created a bubble and Bush over spent 100x
00Billy 3 months ago
@Milleuros People are generally ignorant or stupid, sometimes both. Makes me sad to see a Flanker D take a swim though. I'd rather see a Mikoyan 29K go overboard, it would be less painful lol. Too bad we don't fly Russian airframes! I'd love to see some USAF & Navy flankers ;)
greenjibbles 4 months ago
Mig 29, Russian Carrier. Idiots.
ImFaceman 4 months ago
@ImFaceman
actually that's su33 naval flanker
TheProjektcc 4 months ago
@TheProjektcc I stand corrected. Thanks
ImFaceman 4 months ago
I like how you people fail to notice that those are Russian planes.
greenjibbles 4 months ago
@greenjibbles
noway its amrican cuz rusian dont have planes or boat lol.
(just joking. But there surely are people that don't believe that other armies may have carrier based aircraft)
Milleuros 4 months ago
An F18 weights between 11 tonnes and 23 tonnes (depends on the load), so it sinks immediately. It's a good thing the pilot managed to eject himself; perhaps today he flies an F22 :) :)
supremeon1 4 months ago
Someone finally has a grasp on reality. That plane would sink as soon as it hit the water....
But, he wouldn't be flying an F22. He's navy... The navy doesn't get F22s, maybe he would be in an F35...
Except that he's Russian... : )
PhotoBobBarker 4 months ago
@supremeon1
Actually it's a variant of the Su-27, a russian aircraft, on the Admiral Kuznetsov carrier.
And don't forget that the carrier is 43'000 tons, and it doesn't sink. It only depends on the shape of the object.
Milleuros 4 months ago
@supremeon1 except it's not an F-18, it's a Russian Sukhoi
yomama629 3 months ago
omfg this happened in 2005 so its obamas fault fucking obama wasting 80 million in hard working american tax dollers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
just a joke at all the dumbasses who blame obama for bushes and outhers problems lol....
with33 4 months ago
@with33 It's a Russian plane, not US. :-)
schaffner 3 months ago
Just the drop off the deck is enough to kill a pilot.
ahimel 4 months ago
Imagine what you would do if you eject safely and get killed by the carrier. This would be a real screwup.
WelcomeToRobsLife 4 months ago
at least its not american tax dollars
xDxOxWxNxExYx 4 months ago
Hey I'm pretty sure you guys have no clue what you're talking about.....
These Jets will not sink, they were designed to float. It's call Jettison. When there is a fire on a ship, the crew will push the Jets over board and pick them up later.
chklein1771 4 months ago
@chklein1771 Fighter jets are designed to fly not float. Look up the Convair F2Y Seadart for why we don't see fighter planes that float.
Decaff2010 4 months ago
@chklein1771 oh so the jetsons pick up the people after they sink and die right ya and you have a clue? know anything about physics? or do you just claim to know everything?
scottspook 4 months ago
@chklein1771 :DDD
gubocci 4 months ago
YER FIRED.
eMPCreators 4 months ago
sucks, even if it is an SU-27, (yes im biased lol) but it is a beast of a jet.
hgsmith18 4 months ago
poor guy
WatchMeP00P 4 months ago
That's a bitch. All of you watching this, and thinking that you could've done better than this highly trained pilot, guess again. Think about all the hours you spend at your job, and know that the pilot you just watched crash has spent just as many hours training to land on various surfaces, including this aircraft carrier. And yet it was still too difficult for him. We all screw up at our jobs once in a while, it just sucks more for this guy because of the price tag.
tag7100 4 months ago
@tag7100 he hit the rope that he was supposed to. the one that catches the plane. but something must have malfunctioned with it. so chances are its not even his fault
shane1022 4 months ago
@shane1022 the wire probably snapped or something
ddioppp 4 months ago
@ddioppp you can clearly see the plane coming to a stop as it catched the wire, then it starts to accelerate again as if the wire snapped
NaughtyBurrito 4 months ago
@NaughtyBurrito and?
ddioppp 4 months ago
Well there's your problem...
TheVerandaguy 5 months ago
Holy Shit!
DavidBellus9995 5 months ago
Pilot was forced to SWIM HOME!
Patriot042 5 months ago
You mean, 80 million RUBLES! Stinkin' russian junk!
Patriot042 5 months ago
Ah Russia....
vampsith 5 months ago
lol this vid should be called how to blow 80mill in 5 seconds aha
sorebum1 6 months ago
@sorebum1 hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaha
Newlolz989 5 months ago