Added: 10 months ago
From: ae911truth
Views: 23,610
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (123)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • a third skyscraper collapsed on 911 and it was completely kept out of the news. how can all those fools still be in denial after learning this? because its not an intellectual issue, its a psychological issue. we have to become psychologists and find a way to penetrate their mental roadblocks so they will look at the evidence.

  • Bravo Richard! The sneaky interviewer failed to sidetrack you into the question of who was responsible. You stood firm about the real issues of science and engineering.very well done.

    شكرا يا ريتشارد على ثباتك ورباطة جأشك أمام محاولة المذيع لدفعك إلى حديث المؤامرات. لقد هزمت المحاولة بالثبات على حديث الأدلة الهندسية والعلمية عن كيفية الانهيار واكتشاف بقايا المتفجرات. ما أروع حديثك يا ريتشارد

  • 3:15

    Its quite amusing to watch many of the proponents of the official story use fallacious arguing tactics, at times its like they are just running down the list on wikipedia.

  • This guy is my hero~!!!!

    INVESTIGATE 9-11 and NIST - It's time for the truth to come out. We have been betrayed by the disinformation and corporate media. There is simply no question these buildings were blown up & imploded with explosives and "investigators" have done nothing but try (and fail miserably) cover it up!! It's time. The victims (including the soldiers and Iraqi's & Afghani's whose lives have been destroyed) demand JUSTICE!!

    WE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, DEMAND JUSTICE!

  • Love how Richard always highlights that their goal is not to present possible conspiracies, but to use the scientific method (which was completely ignored in NIST reports) to promote another investigation! The goal is not to blame, it is to reveal the truth through analysis and a proper investigation.

  • That was a surprisingly tepid fox interview!

  • @OnlyTheBestDnB i agree whole-heartily! i expected gage to get cut off every 5 seconds by the interviewer...

  • BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO to Gage that DID NOT play the game of the interviewer...never get into speculation, stick to the facts and...let the chips fall where they may !!! BRAVO Gage!

  • I find it interesting that all this guy is talking about is the evidence presented that explosives were used, and the host at least twice tries to paint him into a corner regarding a conspiracy. He doesn't say that anyone in particular did it, and yet he gets the third degree regarding conspiracy....Unobjective reporting, and unfair to the guest.

  • @taledarkside.

    "a jet engine car can do 700mph at 0feet. Oh wait, is the air too thick now. LOL"

    Your an idiot! This about achieving lift or otherwise known as flight. You know, the things planes do.... Because of the shape size and weight of the plane in the environment that it is in, the speed has everything to do with it. Te plane would not keep and be able to fly at those altitudes at those speeds. It would not be maneuverable at those speeds at those altitudes. Is that clear enough "pilo

  • @wallaceju never mind the damn planes (or lack thereof!) focus on the evidence of explosives, it's the only thing no one can argue or speculate about! NIST says: no evidence of explosives. When asked if they looked, NIST says: No we didn't test or look for explosives. HMMMMM.... WONDER WHY THEY DIDN'T LOOK...

  • I find it odd that they didn't show building 7 collapse during this whole thing.... even though gage mentions it and they just continue to show the twins. Look if they aren't covering it up then who ever is editing and choosing what to put on the screen should be fired cause they are idiots and clueless. Cover up I would say.

  • @wallaceju definitely

  • Mass media cover-up is a big clue as to WHO did 9/11. WHO own/control mass media?

    ReDiscover911 dot COM

  • @whole2th CIA! Scary scary stuff.

  • The interviewer seems to be non-confrontational but he asks about political consequences, un-corroborated confessions, un-corroborated official theories, and attempts by the government to discredit Mr. Gage without dealing with any of the evidence he presents. While somewhat subtle and not as in your face as Fox News they are still not presenting the 911 questions in an open and honest way. It is certainly great for Mr. gage to get a larger audience for what he presents.

  • Yes, Richard, yes, the scientific method. It's so obvious we've needed to use this for all aspects of social concern for SO LONG. It's long been time we redesign our society around the perimeters of these possiblities and abundance instead of scarcity and fear.

    go to thevenusproject . com for more info

    or watch zeitgeist moving forward /watch?v=4Z9WVZddH9w

  • " proved right or wrong " HAHA He just proved it with science evidence that dont lie. The gov disagrees loll No Shit they did it

  • Since the plane hit one side of the building it should have toppled over on its side. there is no way that it would have free fallen, unless it was a demolition.

  • @dawg098 Exactly. This goes for WTC7 as well. NIST official story says a singular column failure (under the penthouse) caused the rest to fail, but it is completely a violation of physics for that to happen simultaneously. It would fall or lean to one side and meet resistance and visually slow down, not drop at free-fall speed of gravity!

  • Gates got the point. What he says is that he has no idea whomthe fuck did this to the buildings but they certainly weren't collapsed by the planes. There should be more scientific investigation on this event, then we should investigate those who had access to the buildings prior to the event.

  • what a joke. The reporter says this guy in prison boasted he did this. Can you believe anything the US government says? They torture people to confess to whatever they want. And that they don't even need to do. They just give a statement and you have to accept it as the truth. This is a small group of bankers and wealthy criminal families behind this (Bush, Rockefellor, Clinton <= yes also he). Amerikans and the rest of the world need to understand we are in danger.

  • before the upper floors can gain momentum, the trusses must have crashed. and they must have crashed all at once and at the very same millisecond. otherwise the nearly freefallcollapse cound not have been so symetrically. but as everybody can easily see the fire was not hot enough, you see people in the impacthole, and there were segments on the floor without any fire, where people even used the stairs to go downstairs.

  • @freidenki

    how about the people that jumped to their death? how about those fires?

    and fires are not hot? i guess my stove is useless.

  • @taledarkside

    What is hot???

    The lowest temp structural steel can melt is at 1130 degrees C., the lowest temp structural steel can melt with a eutectic mixture is 850 degrees C. (according to NIST)!!!

    When cremation is done, the temp is between 700 and 1000 degrees C. I'm sure it wasn't that hot... Especially when people were moving around inside...

    To top that off, your BBQ grill, which is HOT, as some would say, cooks the meat at 250 degrees C. similar to the recorded temps from NIST!!!

  • @ctrackmonger taledarkside is a known troll shill, DO NOT FEED HIM!

  • oh man, Obama just said Bin Ladin was responsible for 9/11

    that just debunked Loose Change lying.

    Soon, Gage will have to get a real job

  • @taledarkside

    LMAO, so show me where he has been charged for it???

    You are too hilarious, every time right before elections this shit happens!!!

    Remember 2004??? I remember it quite well, I was in Iraq then!!!

  • @ctrackmonger

    I remember being in Iraq before 2004.  Maybe you should learn your US history.

  • @taledarkside

    LMAO remember when I said touch up your comprehension skills???

    Really take that advice!!!

    I asked if you remembered the year 2004, which was an election year, and than I stated I remember that year good, as I was stationed in Iraq then!!!

  • how was it possible, that the towers could carry the heavy momentum for so many years?

  • @freidenki

    WTC never carried "momentum" It support a load

  • He did a great job on my Local News!

  • I don't understand how the common American can be so ignorant to this.

    Don't you all want to know the truth? -Is it too scary?

    Why don't you all demand a proper investigation? -You know those investigations that answer all the questions, not creating a ton of more..

  • Comment removed

  • Well done Richard - Nice, concise and clear. If we are absolutely relentless, I think we can break through. This is unlike any other event due to the sheer amount of visual and physical evidence due to the time in which it took place. I mean... I can't imagine what will happen if and when it does become apparent on a mass-scale, but I'm doubtful that it will. It's so frustrating.

    Also annoys me the fact the guy said "brave passengers", they weren't brave, they had no choice. It's just tragic.

  • yes! great

  • Let the chips freefall where they may...

  • @12Weasel

    Weasel by name Weasel by nature......I was gonna say one day your gonna look very fucking stupid.....but it looks like you have beat me to it.

  • I have been on the side helping to get a real lawful investigation (G.J.) into these crimes since I saw on my television time delayed live, a second flight impact.

    Then the excuses why the military did not act, when it is a sleepless machine that only stands down on orders to do so.

    Hard evidence in the form of demolition materials in a location they do not belong, yet the officials sit on corrupt hands. They should be brought in as coconspirators they way they do nothing but a coverup.

  • excellent responses by david gage! this is a really good brief interview.

  • @ho2cultcha A Minor point to us but important to him, Richard Gage.

    A Grand Jury investigation is the only lawful method to get this criminal investigation rockin n rollin.

    If any witness refuses to cooperate, contempt of the Grand Jury should be implemented on those that did their criminal roles in this. None of this Twos'ees and no nortes allowed to leave nonsense.

    Some of the 911ConMission members know they had better CTAs and did two days aftyer we started saying they R coconspirators

  • the mainstream media never shows WTC 7 falling when talking about 9/11

  • PROPS TO THE MOVEMENT! 

  • Oh noes Kallid said he did it! That means now that buildings can implode magically?? Durr anyway good video and it's good to hear the reporter say it's ok to ask the question.

  • At 0:34 "...a day of infamy." Just what FDR said about the Pearl Harbor attack. And just what was called for ("...a new Pearl Harbor") by the PNAC in order to gain public acceptance to more funding and build-up for the American military. 9/11 was the lying, murdering bastard's new Pearl Harbor.

  • I've seen this before where "news" programs refuse to show the videos of Building 7. They must be under great pressure not to -- as it is just too much an obvious demolition.

  • Not sure if the reporter is intentionally trying to derail the theory here or is not fully understanding what Richard Gage is actually stating. It seems as if the reporter is assuming that Gage is one of the "there were no planes" theorists which is why he immediately went on to mention the attack on the Pentagon and the Pennsylvania jet. He then continues to talk about who planned the initial attacks ignoring that Richard was on topic of the collapses. Terribly researched questions from Fox.

  • @TheHolySpirit I did like how the reported said at the end "you may be proved right or you may be proved wrong". It seems the question of the validity of the mainstream 9/11 story is gaining acceptance as legitimate.

  • @TheHolySpirit these guys are all controlled by the govt. remember they get 150-200 billions a years from the federal reserve (the mainstream media). and the guys hosting news like this guy, is simply reading a script behind the camera. teleprompter? yes.

  • Why Fox News does not show images of Building 7 ?

  • Go Gage. I think he looks a bit like Kane from C&C with the full baldie.

    All architects should get involved with ae911truth. Those buildings are a lot less heavy at the top than they are at the bottom. How does 19% of the building's mass destroy the 81% of mass below it? Defies vector physics and newtons laws.

  • @jops11 "Defies vector physics and newtons laws."

    I'm sure you're an expert on "vector physics" (whatever that is), but I don't think the collapses of the WTCs violate any of Newton's Laws.

  • @unRompecabezas it doesn't violate newtons laws IF there were explosives planted that would remove any resistance from floors below the "falling floors." For every action there's an equal and opposite reaction. If a floor falls and hits another floor it WILL slow down... and those floors hit others will also slow down.. the acceleration of falling floors SHOULD NOT and CANNOT be at or Near free fall speed, as documented and timed by scientists and engineers. FreeFall speed = no resistance

  • @fiapop Exactly and that leads an investigator to those that covered up and destroyed evidence to those crimes. In their eye for an eye world they wouldn't last the thought of their water boards. We'd get to the bottom of it pronto with dumbo.

  • @fiapop "the acceleration of falling floors SHOULD NOT and CANNOT be at or Near free fall speed, as documented and timed by scientists and engineers"

    Sure it can, if the falling floors gain so much momentum that the lower structure can't offer sufficient resistance. There's nothing mysterious or unscientific about this, it's just not something the AE911Truth folks want to explain to you. They're pandering to your ignorance of these issues.

  • @unRompecabezas Falling floors will not GAIN momentum if falling into the path of MAXIMUM resistance. If you drop a bowling ball at ground level, it WILL NOT gain momentum AFTER it hits the ground and continue burroughing into the ground. That's simply ridiculous...as ridiculous as your claim.

  • @unRompecabezas ??The point is all the floors would offer a SLOWDOWN....unless the floors and debris weren't there at all!!And your talking about a skyscrapers!!Man, what is wrong with people?either way~nobody knows what happened, truthfully, so why not!A new Investigation???I mean, that is what intelligent people do right??So that it doesn't happen again?Or maybe change a few other existing skyscrapers up to code so this doesn't happen again??What is the big deal about a new investigation?

  • @musicloverofall

    A floor isn't going to slow down 500,000,000lbs of momentum

    thats like saying a car stuck on a railroad tracks is going to slow down a train. ROFL stupid brainwashed people

  • @unRompecabezas Bro... there were what... 20 floors above the impact? and how many below? 80ish? now explain to me how this is possible for 20 floors to have enough "momentum" to CRUSH and pulverize 80 floors below.. keeping in mind it wasn't like the 20 floors above were suspended hundreds of feet in the air before starting its descent... it was right above the 80 below. there's been many experiments disproving your pancake theory.. youtube it.

  • @fiapop

    500,000,000 lbs of momentum seems enough for me to crush one floor at a time while the momentum increases each floor.

  • @taledarkside What are you basing your opinion on? Are you an architect or engineer? Are you a skyscraper demolition expert? Are you an urban fire fighter? If not, I would like to refer you to another video I just viewed on this channel: Blueprint for Truth-The Architecture of Destruction. Keep investigating and examine the facts. I am not an engineer, architect, demo expert or fire fighter. I just want to know the truth. I hope more and more of us want to know. Peace

  • @GayleTube

    I"m an engineer and a pilot. Plus, I have 2 other degrees.

  • @taledarkside

    LMAO, you're a fake, another account from you is Merlin5x5!!!

    WHAHAHA loser!!!

  • @ctrackmonger

    ya, i'm a fake account, stupid fuck. I have the same screenname as the one on my motorcycle club.

    a jet engine car can do 700mph at 0 feet. oh wait, is the air too thick now. LOL

  • @taledarkside

    I'm still waiting for a pilot to explain how a plane go over do it's max VD of 420 knots by 166 knots???

    If it helps you out any, that information came from an Air Traffic Controller!!!

  • @ctrackmonger

    take a physics class because its easy for any object to reach a high velocity from a gravity fall. Don't have to be a pilot to know how velocity works.

    planes gain speed when it crashes. DUH STUPID only time a plane slows down is in a stall. but what do conspiracy theorists know

  • @taledarkside

    LMAO, so how does it work, please tell me the difference between the velocity falling 12 feet, and falling 88 stories has???

  • @ctrackmonger

    give me numbers to work with

    how much of a weight and I'll show you the difference in momentum

    i already said 500,000,000lbs of momentum moving 12 feet .  or are you gonna say that much weight isn't Heavy. LOL

  • @taledarkside

    So how much kinetic energy is created???

    Because as we know, the building was already holding that weight!!! So how much kinetic energy comes from moving 12 feet???

  • @ctrackmonger

    WTC wasn't holding that weight. The EARTH was holding that weight.

    you have no clue about physics. and I believe kinetic is 1/2MV so you wanna know how much Joules was created. LOL

  • @ctrackmonger He's a disinfo troll with multiple sock puppets at his disposal.

  • @taledarkside

    So please explain how a 767 200 ER can do 542 mph (NIST's Calculation) at 800 feet???

    Because as far as I could find the Max VD (dive speed) for a 767 200 ER from 23,000 to 17,800 feet is set for 420 knots, while 542 mph @ 800 feet has the TAS (true air speed) of 586 knots at 17,000 feet...

  • @taledarkside this is not the question. how could all the trusses give way at the same moment at one time absolutely at one time, that the whole tower could fall in nearly freefallspeed in its footprint. all three scycrapers. please, this is the first question at all.

  • @freidenki

    500,000,000lbs of momentum will cause all the trusses to break. I'm still waiting for gage to tell us what the weight loading is of the WTC. but 10 years later, no answer.

    WTC never fell in its own footprint. Debry went all over the place. And WTC caused the collapse of WTC 3, the 4th building that the truth movement doesn't talk about. WHY. because it would debunk Gage's bullshit science of momentum

  • @taledarkside

    LMAO @ the shill!!!

    Maybe you should buy a hearing aid, because it's clear you didn't understand what he was saying!!!

  • @taledarkside

    WTC3 was a hotel sitting next to WTC1 and 2, it took the brunt of force from WTC2 and was still standing, than WTC1 fell on it!!!

    It didn't burn and fall, it was crushed by 2 buildings falling...

    Problem is, the momentum of the falling debris had in excess of 88 stories to gain momentum before impact with WTC3, in comparison with the 12 feet of movement for the structures themselves!!!

  • @ctrackmonger

    oh wait, now WTC 1 fell on WTC 3. but richard gage said, it fell in its own footprint. so which lie are you gonna tell me?

    Momentum starts when an object moves, doesn't matter how much.

  • @taledarkside

    Like I stated earlier, I think you need to get a hearing aid, he was talking about WTC7 that fell in it's foot prints in classic CD fashion!!!

    Than he talks about WTC1&2 being an explosive event, hurling 50 to columns in excess of 600 feet radius at 70 mph...

    Watch the video again...

  • @ctrackmonger

    Richard gage said there was no explosions because they make too much noise, this is to his very first videos on the internet.

    maybe you should keep up with the lies that richard gage says

    and richard gage says, a building can't collapse from momentum when theres 20,000tons of structural steal. that would make WTC 3 collapse impossible by Gage.

    keep drinking the koolaid. Bin ladin is DEAD. and Gage still hasn't started an investigation ROFL

  • @taledarkside

    LMAO, once again, watch the video again, and while you're at that, touch up on your comprehension skills!!!

  • Do you know how momentum works???

    Do you have a clue how Kinetic Energy is converted???

  • @ctrackmonger

    I know the truth movement doesn't know how any physics works because they still use the term "FREE FALL" when it doesn't exist on planet Earth.

    ROFL

  • @taledarkside definitely not. u are just assuming. however how can 20 floors PULVERIZE the 80 below? at near free fall speed? so the resistance must have been removed from underneath your collapsing floors theory, or else each floor below would slow it down a bit. You can't avoid Newton's Laws.

    Pancake theory is flawed and impossible to have also cause Thousand lbs of steel frame to fly over 600feet and have still enough energy to penetrate and lodge itself in nearby buildings. Go study.

  • @fiapop ...and all of the floors should have been stacked up to some extent if it had been a pancake collapse, but they were not. They were not even there in the wreckage. The floors were completely pulverized. Even the steel decking was completely pulverized. The largest remains of body parts were quarter inch bone fragments ; pulverized and blown as far as 300 feet away on to the tops of other buildings. Please excuse the graphic details.

  • @unRompecabezas explain where in the world the momentum would come when 1/8th of the building is supposed to demolish the 7/8ths that lie below? MAYBE... IF and ONLY if .. that top 1/8th of the bld were lifted high above the remaining 7/8ths... then MAYBE some momentum could build up to crush down what's underneath. MAYBE. but in this case the room for momentum to build was over a distance of 1 floor circa 3 meters? that's not plausible man. and explain the nano thermite found? military grade.

  • @unRompecabezas Yeah not if explosives were used. A plane doesn't have the kinetic energy to knock down a giant steel skyscraper by itself. You need way more energy than that. That's where the explosives come in to make it work.

  • @unRompecabezas

    WTC7 fell in virtual free fall acceleration for 2.5 seconds (according to NIST) which was 1/3 of the 6.7 collapse time noted, where did the supports go from 1/3 of the 49 stories???

  • Is there a reason they didn't show building 7? I can only guess.

  • about 11-12 seconds before the north tower collapses their was 2.3 magnitude seismic activity equivilent to an earth quake probably underground explosive to destroy a core column then, 10 seconds later the the Radio tower lowers several feet then you hear POP-CrackleCrackleCrackle before it starts to collapse 3secs later boom-CrackleCrackleCrackle then it starts to collapse and mid collapse you hear the BOOM and see squibs.

    Do you know what im talking about?

    Have any additional insight?

  • "Architect Richard Gage Explains Reasoning Behind the AE911 Call For New Scientific investigation in an interview with Fox 2." This is the correct title. Also, please give the title a date in which this interview aired.

  • wish gage remembered to mention that WT7 wasnt hit by a plane, but good job nonetheless

  • @Brawn Does it really matter? No building hit by a plane is going to implode suddenly and uniformly - not a hotel and not a skyscraper.

  • notice how Fox news still don't show WTC7 footage when it was being talked about?

  • What, they couldn't find footage of WTC7? Gage is used to this kind of censorship. Way to stay on point.

    The title of this isn't right. I thought he was going to reveal a 'who done it'.

    Also, he talks about facts not 'theory'.

  • @JohnnyContempt

    You should see the censorship from truther videos blocking my comments. they must be afraid of truth.

    Gage is never going to reveal anyone because hes just a leader of a pyramid scheme.

  • @taledarkside Smoke some more crack and stay out of the "truth" business. Fools like you are a dime a dozen.

    Get a life.

  • @JohnnyContempt

    You mean how Richard Gage doesn't talk about the truth of WTC 3.

    keep smoking dope and being a richard gage sheep, because you need a leader. ROFL

  • A respectful interview? That's a new one.

  • Thanks ! :)

    

  • Bush and the whole Government planned 9/11

  • Great interview!

    Michigan people are pretty cool and the drive from Dayton Ohio was worth it. I met some neat seasoned Truthers as well as some very nice newbies. I encourage others in the Truth Movement to do a road trip whenever Richard Gage, AIA speaks within driving distance. It was an empowering experience and renewed my hope that we will get a new investigation.

  • @JackTheJust

    LOL, you drove to listen to a guy brainwash you. what a dumb sheep.

    LOL richard gage a new investigation. 10 years and gage hasn't done it. Maybe after you sell your house and give him 300,000. he can take another 10 years.

    Newton discovered physics quicker than Gage will ever start an investigation. keep drinking the koolaid.

  • @taledarkside I think it is time for me to visit my Ron Paul friends in Chicago. I have been meaning to for awhile and now I am motivated. I don't like being stalked on Youtube, not at all. If it takes a 6 hour drive & a heart to heart talk to end it, so mote it be.

  • @JackTheJust

    Maybe you shouldn't censor people because you never made it past junior high.

    So how do you explain WTC 3? Richard gage is afraid to talk about it. why?

    how do you explain 20,000 body parts that were not vaporized because there was no 4,000* F thermite ?

    physics says bodys start to vaporize at 2,000 degrees. Thermite burns at more than 4000 degrees. Yet, they found 20,000 body parts at ground zero. Maybe you should pay richard gage more because you are dumb

  • @taledarkside See you in a few months.

  • @JackTheJust

    now i have to not vote for ron paul because he has followers that are truthers. the stupidest people next to UFO people

  • I'm bloody thrilled that the push for the truth is still going and getting stronger, for a long time I have wondered if it had become a 'lost cause' Keep the push for the truth going.. Best wishes from Australia.

  • Don't let them pull you away from the math! don't get into who or why!

  • LOVE & RESPECT... VICTORY IS AT HAND...THE RIGHT HAND...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more