Added: 3 years ago
From: hossgonzo
Views: 95,614
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (394)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So..is this an M-60 or a Chieftain that was "hitted"???

  • Sorry, but what kind of chicken shit is that?

    The tank gets hit and the commander and I assume the loader bail out.

    No one tries to get the gunner out and no one tells the driver to bail. He is left to drive a burning tank.

    Thats just screwed up. Crew members are supposed to look out for one another.

    This speaks to poor training.

  • Was the tank carrying boxes of munitions in the back shortly before being "hitted"?

    Seemed more like an accident to me, still the tank driver did good to drive it away from the unit.

  • Did you really say, "hitted".....

  • is he dead

  • @gggggg9354

    no he is not.

  • Kharamshahr was re-taken in 1982, correct?

  • Looks like that Chieftain was hit by an artillery round. It was still driving after it was hit. What a monster machine those Chieftains are! I hear that they made a great name for themselves in being able to absorb a lot of punnishment.

  • @EddieCat1971 My dad used to make Chieftains at Vickers on the side of the Tyne in Newcastle. The ammo is back there, so it's designed to blow out if it gets hit to save the crew and most of the tank. US tanks, and probably everyone else's, do the same.

  • @cageordie Did your Dad work there when they switched to Challengers? I think most western tanks of the latest generation do that with the ammo storage, like the M-1, Leclerc, Challenger 2. The Brits were the first with the Chieftain in the 60's. Can't say the same with Russian designed or influenced tanks. They kill the whole crew when hit.

  • درود بر دلاوران جنگ

  • Who is win ???

    iran

    ıraq

    No guys i think america and israel

  • Good video apart from the shitty dramatic music which sounds like a war film from the 1940's...sort of cheapens the serious nature of the piece

  • Tank is a Chieftan, British built, looks like it has some upgrades, unfortunately not where it got hit

  • Israel can destroy both Iran and Iraq in a few hours..

  • @MrSexomaniakos4ever

    hahaha

    Look at what you want to chew

    Hezbollah, Iran' child, will end Israel life for ever!

  • @behboei Fucking idiot.. Israelis have developed 10 years ago the missiles Iran is trying to produce.. Jericho 1/2/3.. and Israel produces cruise missiles of all kinds with nuclear warheads.. even sub-launched! Iran and any other Arabic country will disappear form the maps in 10 minutes if they ask for it.. Knee before Israel motherfuckers..

  • @MrSexomaniakos4ever you are a cock sucker. 

  • @PERSIAisHISTORY i am a flying nuclear dick targeting your dirty ass.. ha ha hahah

  • @MrSexomaniakos4ever keep sucking, haha

  • @PERSIAisHISTORY

    The Americans are going to rape your ass in military prisons.. you'd better go for training so as not to be so hard for you..

  • @MrSexomaniakos4ever lol, Americans are killed in thousands in Iraq.

    Little fag, you always talk about "Americans cock", do you have American boy friend?

    Mine is thick by the way if you are keen for sucking ;-)

  • @PERSIAisHISTORY "Americans are killed in thousands in Iraq"

    You make it sound like you have some big victory here. But oh wait, it's just...45 this year. Less than the amount of US soldiers who die from TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS each DAY. Nice. No wonder your country is a shithole...you can't even count. Besides which, unlike your people, we have the ability to flatten it in a day. Generosity is what stops us, only that. So any "victory" you score is relative. Remember that you goat-fucker.

  • @redreaper2020 bohaha, ye my country is a shit hole because the governors are bunch of corrupt, serving for their western and russian masters. If my country be governed with its own intellectual (who actually majorities of them moving out to your or others countries) then we know how to fuck intruders like you, as you can take a look at the history of Iran. Actually I think American are bunch of chunk fags, many of you think Europe is a country, lol, or New Zealand is in middle east and etc.

  • @PERSIAisHISTORY most of the world's intellectual elite is educated in the US. The top ten fortune companies are American. Your country isn't a shithole because of the governors serving "foreign masters", that's just propaganda. Your country is a shithole because of people like you. It's always easier to go "X has it better because of (insert convenient stereotype)" rather than admit "X is better because it worked for it, and my people spent 100 years fighting its neighbors"

  • @PERSIAisHISTORY Pull your head out of your ass, stop listening to propaganda and stereotypes, and think about WHY the world is how it is. Why? Because people worked for it. Your people have never worked for anything for your country. Where are your Saladins? Where is this chivalry? It takes no guts to kill an innocent; it just makes us bomb you more.

    Besides, you live in fantasy. "Sharia law in the 21st century"? LOL

  • @redreaper2020 Ye some of these stupid Sharia law is performed by the government not because people want it, Iran's government does it just to show how bad guy Iran is, in this way they give the excuse to western country to attack Iran. Iran's government is serving for his western masters. Without a bad guy like Iran who supports terrorist groups in Israel, Israel has no excuse to occupy more land. The same to you, without Taliban, US had no excuse to occupy middle east and suck the oil.

  • @PERSIAisHISTORY The west been always making excuses to attack the middle east ! history speak better with government either Iran they would attack anyway ! have we forgotten the Salah Al Din days when the cursadors attacked the middle east and the British france invasion on north africa and the middle east anyway every time it end up by the west losing alot of souls and money such as what happened in Iraq

  • @redreaper2020 i agree with u, redreaper2020..

  • @redreaper2020 i agree. if we wanted iraq's recources we could kill every man, women, and child in that country in 24 hours. instead we bring them water. and people still talk shit.

  • @mottomankevusmc dumbass... Your goverment said that there are biological weapons in Iraq, then they said that they almost found it, and then they said that there are no bio weapons at all... talk shit? huh...

  • @MrSexomaniakos4ever Greek fag, I love how Turks fucked your country, mohaha...

  • @behboei Hezbollah lacks the means to do so.  Even if Israel simply got the fuck up and left, Hezbollah lacks the firepower. It's a terrorist organization--not a standing army. It is fundamentally incapable of occupying and holding ground. Israel will keep kicking your asses because you keep doing the same thing--arguing amongst each other and having a circlcejerk about hating everything, rather than doing anything to improve yourselves!

  • Sorry, but that tank was NOT hit either by a shell or Missile!!! The whole damn thing would have exploded and the turret would have gone 200 feet in the air. If you look carefully there is a box on the back of the tank. It most likely contains some sort of munitions and the engine heat ignited it. The explosion was not that great to indicate a tank shell or missile.

  • @thegoosebrain if the turret flew off from a direct hit, i would wonder why tigers are one of the most solid tanks ever built

  • @Dryerbrosracing2 Not sure what you meant that post. Are you referring to the WW2 German Tiger tank? All tank turrets are basically the same. They sit atop the tank and are NOT attached in any way. They are floating atop a ring of ball bearings and when an internal explosion happens in a tank the turret blow upwards like a cork from a champagne bottle.

  • @thegoosebrain The tigers where feared for there tough armor, and all the munitions being used at this time by this people were not very efficient AKA Old russian surplus and varied countries of origin , It took quite awhile before russian munitions were capable of total damage to there own tank in one direct hit.

  • Comment removed

  • FUCK KHOMAINY AND FUCK SADDAM

  • War is embedded in human nature . we cant live if we dont kill . I fell sad when i see an Iranina die . I feel sad when I see an Iraqi die . I feel sad whn I see an American die . Were all humans , may God give us peace , only he can cure this world of all its ills . Ameen .

    Love from Pakistan to my Iranina and Iraqi brethren .

  • LOL look at these Goons..We (USA) destroyed the Iraqi military in 3 days! We would do the same with Iran...Worthless countries...

  • @SPCB25 Iran was winning against Iraq, but USA gave Iraq weapons.

    Now go and eat your burgers you fat ammy.

  • @VictumRoManius "Winning" over like 10 years? We destroyed Iraq in 3 days in 91 and ran stright up into Baghdad in 03. I myself served in that shithole in 2005. I think we could wipe our ass with Iran in 4 days...Burgers you say? Thank you for the compliment! I agree that we can afford to feed our people from every street corner! While you are out working alllll day to put dinner on your families plate I am hitting the drive through! hahaha U sound mad? USA!!!!

  • @SPCB25 ha amen brother! lol

  • @SPCB25

    Tell us all how we're going to do that when we're bogged down in Iraq & Afghanistan?

  • lol

    stupid iranins

  • @hwazn511 gtfo arab

  • @nintndogameplayer56

    fuck you bitch

    yes im an arab like muhammed & ali & hussen

  • @hwazn511 where did you learn those big words? Rossetta stone? go strap a bomb to your chest and rape children with that disgusting language of yours

  • @nintndogameplayer56

    Suck My Balls

    I Will Rape Your Mother

    LOL

  • @hwazn511 did u just ask me to suck your balls?

  • truthquest

    looks very similar to Usama. US and Paki supplied the guy to fight Soviets....

    BTW its Chieftain MK 2 if I am not mistaken

  • @blackruazan Exactly. Until the day he turned against USA, the CIA supported and used the guy in order to counter USSR in the first place. The truth, as usual, was far stranger than novels. That also proves how ugly the darkside of international politics is.

    Some source says, even the Viet-min was aided by Roosebelt when it was created, in an attempt to get France out of Indochina.

    Chieftain you mentioned, some of them were believed to have been captued and used by Iraqi National Guards.

  • chieftan was hit. did irad have them? i doubt, they aquired mostly Soviet block or chinees tanks as far as I know

  • @blackruazan

    Ironically, Iranian military Forces were once strongly aided by U.S. and British goverment. For example, they could purchase western weapons such as F5, F4, Huey Cobra choppers, and, the Chieftain tanks you mentioned.

    In addition, even the F14, one of the most costly fighters, were bought by Iranians.

    Needless to say, the Iranian revolution turned the whole things around.

  • We must understand that ll this mayhem and destruction is planned by very intelligent beings who call themselves leaders,statesmen or planners.Makes you think,don't it?

  • Was it a TOW missile that hit the T-72?

  • @ferdinand31388

    It is a Chieftain, not a T-72.

    I think it was hit by an anti-tank rocket, likely a Red-arrow type.

  • @Zartan1357

    Oh okay, haha sorry my bad. How many Chieftain tanks did Iran purchase? Are they still operational today?

  • @Zartan1357

    Oh okay, haha sorry my bad. How many Chieftain tanks did Iran purchase? Are they still operational today?

    That Red Arrow rocket, I've never heard of it before. Is it a Chinese or North Korean made weapon?

  • @ferdinand31388

    No problem.

    Iran did procure several of those tanks from the UK before the revolution. They still use them with upgrades and produce some copies of the design. Now, only 100 of them are in service.

    Red Arrow is originally a Russian design. There are Chinese copies known as the HJ series (HJ standing for "Hongjian", which translates to "Red Arrow"). Many countries use them, they are cheap and very effective against modern tanks.

  • that tank was a t-72

  • i don't think hitted is a real word

  • @noddles61

    Improper usage, perhaps, but it is a valid construction according to the rules of English grammar.

  • Comment removed

  • @arabhulk1990 Im sorry for you to have had been part of a world struggle for resources. Hopefully in the future, small nations will assimilate into a global economy so that death isn't the price to pay, rather inflation and mcdonalds.

  • @arabhulk1990 Fuck the US for helping Saddam so long and then finally turning on him.

  • @arabhulk1990 And we respect you man! that war was because of USA giving Saddam chemical weapons. There are CIA documents which state that.

    Iran and Iraq will in future be allies and we will first then be safe of american attacks and our children will then manage to live peacefull side by side.

  • @arabhulk1990 thats why your profile say Norway lmao

  • @arabhulk1990 Yeah, and you're probably also Shiite Muslim, dumbass

  • i love iraq and ARAB

  • tank hitted, i speak engrish

  • Pretty brave to keep on driving a burning tank by yourself though.

  • @Rotiart135

    I do not understand the language, so maybe I am missing something here. How do you know he was still driving? He may have been killed and the tank out of control.

  • this footage shows iranians retreating in front of the iraqi forces during the 80's war .. they were defeated and the iraqi army were chasing them to the irani depths...

  • @aseelalbadrani1 That's no surprise as Iraq was supported by the US and other countries. Iran fought alone and still did not give Iraq a clear victory. Iran also took parts of Iraq's territory. on both sides 1million life's were wasted for what? what was achieved? Saddam destroyed his own military by fighting Iran for so long, and then ended up getting his own ass kicked when the US came for him.

  • @juba1944 yeah Iran fought alone. Oh wait, the US sold IRAN F-14 Tomcats, Hawk SAMs, P-3 Orions, Redeye SAMs, F-4 Phantoms, oh but that's all... Iran was all alone!!

  • @whateverbitches1 , yes they had all that but give credit for puting them into good use by competent personell , and yes Iran was alone to sort out how to maintain their F14s and to fly them in combat and maintain air superiority in the whole 8 years of war !

  • @whateverbitches1 those weapons were given to them before the war, and they are still in their air force to this day, they had very hard time with spare parts for their american jets especially, iran did not fight alone, but had veyr minimal support compared to iraq

  • @tupacIzAlive33

    Keep in mind that behind the scenes, Iran was reverse-engineering parts for those aircraft. At the same time, they were designing aircraft of their own combining American, Chinese, and Russian technology. Since then, they have already made an original fighter called something like "lightning" or "thunder". I don't know if the Iranians make the engines for their jets or buy them, though.

  • @juba1944 The US supported both sides. Iraq got intel, Iran got TOW ATGMs along with HAWK SAMs. While I am not a friend of Iran, Saddam started the war as an attempt to steal Iran's oil resources.

  • @Robbob9933 Saddam was a pussy and got what he deserved. Iraq has enough Oil yet his greed made him kill 500,000 innocent people and wage war for nothing. Look where Iraq is today, and look at Iran. Today Iran is in much better position then Iraq.

  • @aseelalbadrani1 lolol those clown's fought each other for 8 year's and no one won as much as a square mile as they were both as pathetic as each other

  • @MrStewart149, Iraq & Iran might have fought a non desisive war then, but their resources and leader s were not the greatest. Could you say the same form the White western Leaders that "Bled Europe Dry", literally in WWI?. I find the excuses made for Iraq & Iran far more acceptable than the ones any one could make up to excuse the pointless slaughter or injuring of over 20,000,000 in WWI?.

  • @Wolfen443 They had no excuse either. although it was the first modern industrial war but at least someone won it at the end .not something iran/iraq can claim is it '

  • i think iran should produce chiftain tanks

  • @KHfreak7526 Chieftains pwn. 

  • They got RAPED

  • the tank have been hitted!!!

  • Do you know the name of the tank driver?

  • esa es la funcion de un verdadero tanque de batalla soportar un impacto directo para permitir que la tripulacion salve con vida el conductor eso si fue muy valiente en llevar el tanque a un lugar alejado ,el tanque es un chieftain

  • fukin iraq had to pick a fight with us

  • say what you want about the person that uploaded the video, I have to say that driver had some balls. Even though I'm happy to see Iran get its ass handed to them by Iraq, you gotta get credit to those that put their own ass above and beyond like that.

  • @rick67hou Iran get it's ass handed to them? You gotta be kidding, go read some history about that war.

  • Is vocabulary your favorite class?? "Hitted"

  • Some sort of projectile hit it. You can see and hear it right before the explosion.

  • TRANSLATE: the tank was ran over a landmine, the crew saw the engine and the back of the tank on fire, they bailed out, while the driver staid inside, while he knew the tank was on fire, while he drove the tank away, he also ran over a car, he drove a the tank away so if the tank had exploded, it wouldnt harm any other person close by, he sufferd heavy burn injuries. and was droven to hospital

  • that is iranian lion right there.salute you my brave brother.

  • iran should just mass produce the chieftain tank

  • It's a chieftian tank...

  • what is the track used in this clip i kno its from pearl harbor

  • brave, shojaat faghat male mardan ahle eman hast

  • lol tank hitted

  • that guy was brave!

  • LOL, what a great Frontline !

  • The tank commander get killed?

  • brave

  • i agree with serious ben... it may have been a container of ammo... this was an accident... if it had been hit, chances are the entirety of the people would run away and the driver would leave to... all points towards an accident

  • This is an iranian tank. it doesnt look like they were in battle, i think the fuel tank caught on fire

  • that is not an m60, it looks like chieftain or upgraded centurion?

  • @SuperFinnish it is chieftain

  • It seems that the grey box on top of the engine start to burn a secound before the explosion.You can see at 0.09 a flash and the lid blows away .

    The other tank has also at the same spot such a box.0.13

    May be they should read the operating manual again.

  • what kind of munition used to destroy the tank??

  • The box right on top of the engine caught on fire. It could've been fuel or ammo, certainly not a place to keep flammables.

    This is British Chieftain tank.

  • I like watching real war footages! It shows the reality of war and keeps me away from hoping to play a part in it. (Yeah, I know it´s childish and naive, but it keeps me "alive" ... in a way)

  • @ErsterSekretaerdesZK ,yes sir , it has a very strong draw..Good Luck Brother

  • @ErsterSekretaerdesZK What is to be learnt from such historical records is the value of humanity, self respect, dignity and that at no time and no place bowing down to tyrants is acceptable.

    Be it with our bare hands, we are obliged to defend the real values and n excuse, under NO condition is acceptable..

    Those men and like them, have set the standards for us....it is up to us to keep it alive in our mind and actions.

    Peace

  • @ErsterSekretaerdesZK war is not game, but serving ones country is honor

  • @ErsterSekretaerdesZK we are all going to war men women and children all alike

  • @ErsterSekretaerdesZK Jup, always remember that the other guy is someone's son too. Or father, brother, husband, comrade. War is a fascinating thing to see on a screen, but I always get a chill down my spine when I realise some poor guy just died a horrible death in front of my eyes.

  • What the...

  • is he okay?

  • did he survived?

  • what hit it? was this during the Iran-Iraq war?

  • It's a Chieftain Mk5P, deleivered to the Iranians in 1976. If you look carefully you can see a box sitting on the top of the powerpack. It certainly cooked off from the heat of the engine or it went over a land mine.

  • it was t-72 tank or t-80 ; >

  • no, no broadjumper1is right, it is a Chieftain.

  • the tank is a Centurion (UK made)

  • No, that's a Chieftain, but that's also a UK tank.

  • I like Star Wars, do i win ?

  • what does israel have to do this?

  • رحم الله الشهداء الابرار

  • Stupidest war in the history of wars.

  • And which war wasnt stupid?

  • WW2 was not stupid. Hitler had to go

  • Ye and over 60 million others had to go as well.

  • I totaly agree with you man, but if ever i had to participat in a war, so i have a preference for the spanish civil war 1930s

    It was the only war where the good was fighting against evil, but unfortunatly the dark side win!!!

  • And why is that ????

  • @gosciu555 war itself is a lie, man....

  • (Nearly) every War is crap.

  • @gosciu555 Aren't they all?

  • @PayameVatan all but some are so stupid

  • @SoviMusic Indeed.

  • Anyway I think that the tank was not hit by a missile but by a direct artillery fire.

  • the tanks in the clip are British made Chieftans operated by the Iranians during the Iran-Iraq war..... Notice that despite being hit in the engine the tank is not yet knocked out! Wow, why everybody speak about American, Russian or German tanks and nobody remeber about British tanks? I think they are the best.

  • Ya, never mind the Panzer Mk.4, Tiger, King Tiger, or the Leopard II, they are all rubbish

  • I didn't say that they are rubbish! But Panzer IV, Panther, Tiger and King Tiger are old tanks now............. and the Leopard II has never proven in combat, while the British tanks proved to be sucessful in all a series of war around the globe.

  • Man i agree with you yes & no, and this video is the good example of it, what you said about the tanks is correct, you know that Iran vs Iraq war was the last war where there was tanks fighting against tanks & of course the iranian sherman & cheiftens showd their supperiority against T50 to T75, but some thing you don't have to forget is also the hight level of quality of iranian tank crews, like also the iranian pilots, I'm very sad & mad that the world has forgottn this bloody war!!!

  • "you know that Iran vs Iraq war was the last war where there was tanks fighting against tanks"

    Actually, the last battle, that I know of, w/ tank on tank action was Desert Storm. I'm not certain whether Georgian and Russian tanks engaged each other, but that is another possibility.

  • @Exmech2 US tanks were shelling adandoned Iraqi armor at Desert Storm. So did Russians to Georgian. But most enemy tanks are screwed by airpower in both conflicts. Iraqis and Georgians have mastered #1 rule of 3rd world military well. It means as soon as there no civilians but a real army in sight you have to dismantle then dress civilian cloth on and run away from your equipment which is now a target for precision munitions.

  • " US tanks were shelling adandoned Iraqi armor at Desert Storm"

    Umm, no. T-55s, 62s, and 72s were engaged with M-1s and Bradleys. Lots of Iraqi tanks lost, 1 Bradley lost to tank fire.

    The Georgians made the fatal mistake of entering battle without proper anti-aircraft protection. There armored were mostly cut down by cluster munitions and helo fire. Which is why I'm not sure if there was a tank engagment. You seem very ignorant though.

    lrn2history

  • @Exmech2 If you aren't as ignorant please name me a type of cluster munitions Russians used on Georgians. I wanna hear it now. Also i like your claim on Iraqi t-72 which were never ever imported to Iraq. As for DS there was a few engagements for sure but it was never as intense to call it a tank war. Most enemy tanks were bombed and most of them were abandoned at the time.

  • Umm, no. You are the ignorant toad. The Russian munitions were the RBk-500's. I'm sure they used various types.

    You claim the Iraqi's had no T-72s? Shall I post pics of Iraqi T-72 Ms? How about the Asad Babil, which was a licensed built T-72 and served mainly with the Tawakalna brigade where they hit numerous M1s, and disabled at least 2?

    You're an idiot.

    lrn2history

  • @Exmech2 You are a smart ass. You really know something. Yep, they had Asad Babil which is not a licenced built but a cheap Chinese style rip-off incorporating counterfeit Yugoslav components. It was lacking normal fire control and hull was locally made out of shitty steel vulnerable even to high-caliber MG. This thing bring some shame to original t-72. As for Georgian conflict there is no evidence of using cluster munitions. Russians used mostly rockets and plane cannons to bust armor.

  • And you remain an ignorant toad. But at least you admit you were wrong though you forget Saddams T-72Ms. Tanks present, tank kills (many) our side, tank kills (2) their side = Tank to Tank combat.

    Russia AND Georgia admitted using cluster munitions. But at least you correctly point out that there may not have been tank/tank combat in that war.

    lrn2history you toad

  • @Exmech2 Nope, redneck. Georgia CLAIMED Russians were used cluster munitions but never proved it. Feel the difference if you can. As for t-72 I had Asad Babil in mind which is still NOT a t-72 as you claim. BTW, there is a company in China producing a truck looking just like Chevy Avalanche at a distance of 100 yards. If you are to get closer you are to see it is smaller and of bad hand made with two liter Chinese diesel under hood. Does it mean China has avalanche or either Chevy is shit?

  • Difference is, you do need to admit that tank battles did occur after the Iranian war.

    But, photos of expended RBK-500s are proof.

    Anyway, if China is LICENSE BUILDING the avalanche like Iraq was with the T-72m, than we can call it an avalanche. And again, you fail to note the T-72m's that WERE in Saddams toe.

    lrn2history toad.

  • A single photo of used bomb is not a proof but a propaganda to faken a claim of atrocities.

    Tanks are shooting tanks in most wars. But to call it tank battles or tank wars you must have it daily on regular basis through it.

    As for Chevy i told it is not a licence built. Even a GM won't let one to put it's brand on a grasshopper powered yugo-class pickup made by peasants out of spam cans. So didn't Russians.

  • So you're saying that a battle between tanks isn't a tank battle unless it happens every day? You're an idiot as well as being ignorant of history.

    The Assad Babil was a license built T-72. Period. And you can't get around it. AND you STILL evade