Is there anything like this with the 2011 C 63 coupe or new IS F? Looking at trading up from my E 350 to more power next spring, after the winter is over. I love the raw power of the C, and that sound is awesome, but I have heard great things for the new IS F. The M3 is the M3. I've yet to hear anything really negative about it, and yes, I know, I will take them for their test drives, but the reality is, I can't take them out and run them hard with the sales guy beside me.
@recoveringxtian I'd be interested if you found any comparisons with the newer versions of the cars. I haven't seen any.
As for running them hard during a test drive, what I found was that with the M3 and the IS-F, they had specific sales people for those cars, and since you're test driving one that's already broken in, they don't mind you givin er a little. They'll panic if you try to drift, but you can do your normal street driving, if that includes flooring it, power slide out of a corner.
Did he ever mention how bad the automatic gearbox in the Mercedes is? In that you have to hit the paddles 700 to 1000 revs before it hits redline? Otherwise, it will cut off the power. We had this same problem in our SLK55 AMG which is why we got rid of it.
EVERYTHING IS GOOD: Engine, Power, Style, character, FRONT design is incredible, BUT THEY MESSED everything up with the design in the back (((((( why oh why
nahh! coming from an M3 fun with biased view points so I dont believe. I just dont spill words just because its an M3 or an AMG. I have a reason for placing C63 AMG at top.
it's a shame i see this car being driven by rich asian women in their 40s in the city where i live near (Richmond, BC). They probably dont even use 1% of the car's full potential.
your right if ppl are looking to race they will get the ISF because most people race on straight roads anyways most. Both cars are pretty close but the ISF is a 4L V8 which is bigger than the m3. I have to say I really like the design of the ISF but lets take a look at whatsinside the cabin. I feel BMW's technology is very high like does isf have the feature that the seatbelt gets handed to you and the awsome cuphlder that come out.But dashboards the ISF KILLS , the bmw looksplain
the bmw only get 1mpg more than the merc's 6.2 v8, the 4.0 liter on the m3 was tested to be straining the engine too much. plus on the merc u cld actually cut off some cyliners and get even bettermMPG..not bmw
Spoken by a man who has never driven one and has no clue what it's like to do so.
You keep telling yourself that.
The fact that every motor related magazine, show, driver, journalist and anyone who has tried one out (me included) disagree with you don't let that put you off telling yourself what you want to hear.
In 10 years your stock civic is more likely to be electric and supercars are more likely to be a thing of the past unfortunately.
well i only can laugh...6.3 liters....what is that. thats even huge in american standards. well knowledge goes to Bmw M power and Audi who can produce the same or better in a 5 liter V10 naturally aspired(actually F1 technology) . that is 1.3 liter difference, thats enough to move a small car sporty. not to mention driving experience,on a straight line...well its all up to torque...would die in that merc without electronics. In an m5 it is simply just more enjoyable. or an m6.
@hhhzzzhhhzzz The 6.2, not 6.3 is detuned in the C63. If you weren't a stuck-up asshole you'd know that the 63 produces 518HP in its most potent form.
so it would be time now to make a rule: 5 liter vs 5liter. no turbos and stuff like that...well dont have to think too much :Bmw m5,m6 V10 natutally aspired. that is pure knowledge. give 6.3 liters to a truck please. or maybe To Mc Laren F1,(6.1) open up and u will see clearly: BMW M Power. Still the best car since 92.
Jap craps are about more MPG and they are nice replica of german cars. Jap cars just don't have any performance spirits in em. The good thing is jap cars enviromental friendly, hug a tree, get a battery.
You mean only reviews that say what you want to hear? Every review I've ever watched or read on the GTR says it's better than anything Porsche produces with the new GT3 coming closest and that costs double.
So every car with 4 wheels and 2 doors that's faster than a 911 turbo is a copy then?
I'm not German car knocking. I drive a new M3 coupe and love 911's but I hate people knocking cars because they can't cope with it being faster than their fanboy brand.
There is no denying how fantastic the GTR is and it can only help by kicking P an dothers in the ass to make even better cars. Everyone wins when Nissan and others do that. Fanboys need to stop stupid comments
@SoreHead11 It's not about copying you dumbass, Nissan drew inspiration from the 911 which they did. The whole goal was to dethrone the 911 on the track, and they did it. There are a lot of similarities between the two, 6' turbos (although Porsche is a flat 6), AWD, even BOSE sound system. Respect to Nissan engineers though, GTR is an incredible car.
you make me stutter to a point where reading your horseshit makes me retarded. to think God can create such a malfunctioning retard, Christ be with you as your days come more dim and dark for being God's first mistake.
idiot. that comment makes you sound as stupid as you obviously are. The GTR is really all about the MPG. That's why Porsche can't make anything that can keep up with it or out perform it on the Nurb. Don't talk nonsense. At least make sensible arguments. And just in case you think I'm some sort of Jap fanboy I drive a new M3 but I'm not a moron and know a great car when I see one.
I would never buy a japanese car. They're disgusting. You get what you pay for. Just look at a 1980's nissan, and compare that to a 1980's mercedes. On the performance factor, sure, any retard can but a bunch of horses on a car and make it go faster 0-60, but german cars are all about balance, and TORQUE, this world that most AMERICANS don't understand.
Do you really think that 10 years from now you'd be proud of some shitty japanese car? Buy German.
its funny how u talk shit about Japanese cars and yet Japanese and American cars are the most sold cars in the world compared to german cars and have the bigger companies
Is that the same germans that came last in the JD Power survey a few years back? I'd be really proud of that alright.
American engines are all about torque moron. Also, the IS-F has WAY more torque than the M3 (which I won by the way). Before you spout rubbish from your mouth you should read some facts. You might learn something that way and not just spew nonsense.
The Nissan GTR is more balanced than a 911 which is why it laps the 'Ring faster.
how can any one campare a piece of shit toyota to a merc and a bmw... first off straight speed is the onything that matters, cuz i highly dought ur gonna take these cars out to a track and race?? but if you were at a red light and some guy in his ricer wanted to race.....c63 clearly the fastest.. bmw makes the best engines...and toyota should stick to rice burners
Okay look at this point Is-F use 14L to 100km and Benz C63 28L to 100km. And IS-f Get almost the same performance. Plus Benz or BMW after 1 year gonna break like crap
haha... if ur looking for gas efficientcy theres other cars that will do that these cars about performance and luxary...and the isf is last when it comes to straight line speed c63,m3,rs4,isf....and i dont know if you know that a lexus is a toyota which means cheaplt assembled plastic...and comon mercedes and bmw both win top 5 engines every single year...and were do uget the fact that they break down easy there expensive for a reason..
well since your such a car expert im sure your aware of the wards 10 best engines list? and if you are you should know 2008 audi,bmw,merc, were the top 3 in that order nissan being 9th and toyota 10.....im not saying the isf is horrible its just cant be compared to the other 3
And I am sure you aware that Nissan's VQ engine only this engine that gets awards (even in last place). Since engine awards start. So That means VQ engine is always in top 10 in last 10 years
I highly doubt you own a 370z because you put down the car lower then Merc and BMW which is not all that true.
Just like the comparison of the G37 and the BMW 335. People choose the G37 as the winner because of micro performance difference but macro price difference. Same goes with 1 series and the 370z.
the only reason i have is becuase thats mostly my sons car and he likes rice burners......you have to admit when a car is better, and yeah there good cars for there value but you cant compare german engineering for japan.....its the brand your paying for and quility....i dont own a bmw but i admit they make the best cars and engines...but i wouldnt give my e550 up for any 5 series its just prefrence...and all you guys just defend cars that you own but dont admit to which cars are truly better
Once again no. I do respect German cars but you think Japanese cars are not even compariable.
Nissan GT-R. Here is Japanese engineering for you. A car for under $80,000 that outperforms ALL German rivals. The GT-R V-Spec even outperforms the mega expensive Porsche Carrera GT. No BMW vehicle stands even a slight chance against that car on a track.
I can't understand what you saying. Maybe you should go to school? Oh wait if you from America thats mean you just go draw and play or watch in the school! HAHAHA
the IS line is the most complete line in the world in my opinion. luxury, power, looks.. everything you need. of course BMW trumps Lexus in the handling department, but come on, i test drove a 3 series and the interior looked so damn cheap like it was made in the 90s. sitting in a IS and a 3 series are 2 different worlds. the BMW dash and instrumentations were down right ugly and the leather felt like plastic. if you want luxury, lexus is the best and BMW is not even close to being on par
Nowhere. Cadilac currently has no car in this class of preformance luxury sedans. THe only car is the CTS-V and that is going against the M5 and the upcoming GS-F
BMW and mercedes-benz always have cars to compete with each other And about you asking why there comparing a lexus to a bmw and mercedes-benz is an obvous question heres your answer.
THE!!!!!! LEXUS IS_F WAS MADE TO COMPTE WITH THE BMW M3!!!!!! AND MERCEDES_BENZ C63 AMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
And the m3 in this comparison test just took out all its competition again like it always doess the m3 is evry thing you want its just the ultimate drivers car.
because more power better accelegration and more top speed and many people say that the mercedes isnt good in corners but that isnt true i saw a race on tv and there was the mercedes 0.1or 0.2 faster :D
i dont give a fuck about m3 performance and cornering. For me it is enough just to hear that sound of that huge v8. I admit that m3 is better in cornering and has better lap times and i still dont give a fuck about m3. And i just cant get it, that people are arguing about these two cars on every video. There are two types of people obviously, people who like performance of the m3 which they cannot use on the public roads anyway, and people who just cant ignore the beast and the sound of the amg
MT, take a lesson from other productions (Top Gear, etc...). Petrol heads want to hear THE CARS going around the track. The uninspired commentary is OK, but not at the expense of the motors/exhaust/tires.
How well your car puts out the power is one of the key factors of good performance on the track the gear raitios and the clutch and the traction control all go with alot of power really well but there is always how much torque your car puts out to much torque and not very good traction control cause your car to wheel spin and their is always FWD RWD and AWD if your car has good traction control then that helps handle the power and torque well that will make your car put out the torque alot beter
it has 2.3L capacity, 30hp and 200NM more than the BMW, of course it accelerates faster (4.5 s to 60mph not 4s) if it wouldn't you should have burned it .
All that power is wasted at the end...
It is very easy to obtain a powerfull engine .... how you put that power down is the key.
what are you talking about look at all the recorded test resaults the ctsv pushs 0.87g on a 200ft skid pad and that is incredable for a near 2 ton car.
You add the ctsv to compare against a c63 and an m3 because the ctsv doesnt compete with those cars it competes with the M5 and E63 and the ctsv kills all of them.
I watched some of the reviews and you were right. Did they improve the CTS-V drastically? Because when I drove one it didn't feel like it had good handling. Is this because the new one is much better?
I honestly think you cant add the CTS-V in this video. I drove a CTS-V and i'm sorry to say but it handles like crap. American car makers got to step up their game. It's eighter the new Camaro will save GM or it will totally destroy them. Anyway I rather take a German car over an American car any day.
So your not a car lover your a brand baby.....and im sure you drove the CTS-
v...what can you tell us about how it handles?...cause all the major car mags can tell you how it handles.....so when yuo say it handles like crap your obv comparing to a sports car right? people who makes comments like yours are total morons, Baseless remarks by un-informed idiots.
Yes, I did drive a CTS-V and it does handle like crap. I had a 99 E36 M3 and switching to the CTS-V I felt a lot difference between handling. Also the CTS-V's clutch didn't feel sporty it was too loose. Don't get me wrong a CTS-V is a great car all i'm saying is you cant compare it to an M3. It handles well but not enough to be compared to an M3. It's not a brand baby I will take a Z06 over a Ferrari anyday. (Price and Performance)
please re-read my comment to you and get back to me, "when you say it handles like crap your obv comaring to a sports car".....................if an M3 dosnt count as a sports car i dont know what does
The Mercedez is designed for fun!!! Nobody will care if it's like 4 seconds slower! The Mercedez will GUARANTEE Two things
1: more smiles per mile.
2: more visits to the tire shop
BollocksTube21 1 week ago
its a 6.3L V8 NOT A 6.2L LOOOL
jimmy5870 1 month ago
@jimmy5870 No. It's a 6.2 litre. They call it 6.3 as a homage only. Go to the mbenz site and look at the specs.
tommy605 1 month ago
M-POWER
raihancham 1 month ago
///AMG
garmool 3 months ago
Is there anything like this with the 2011 C 63 coupe or new IS F? Looking at trading up from my E 350 to more power next spring, after the winter is over. I love the raw power of the C, and that sound is awesome, but I have heard great things for the new IS F. The M3 is the M3. I've yet to hear anything really negative about it, and yes, I know, I will take them for their test drives, but the reality is, I can't take them out and run them hard with the sales guy beside me.
Thanx
recoveringxtian 3 months ago
@recoveringxtian I'd be interested if you found any comparisons with the newer versions of the cars. I haven't seen any.
As for running them hard during a test drive, what I found was that with the M3 and the IS-F, they had specific sales people for those cars, and since you're test driving one that's already broken in, they don't mind you givin er a little. They'll panic if you try to drift, but you can do your normal street driving, if that includes flooring it, power slide out of a corner.
tommy605 1 month ago
Did he ever mention how bad the automatic gearbox in the Mercedes is? In that you have to hit the paddles 700 to 1000 revs before it hits redline? Otherwise, it will cut off the power. We had this same problem in our SLK55 AMG which is why we got rid of it.
AnonymoussourceL0L 6 months ago
i love the m3 but only in the coupe form not the sedan.
05front 7 months ago
///M cars are superior.. always have been always will be.
TheWestside223 7 months ago
///M POWER - AMG+ISF
nukeonator 7 months ago
id get the amg sell it then buy both the m3 and isf cause i love them so much
lamboistheruler 7 months ago
this guy needs to learn how to hold a steering wheel! that push pull is no good.
obiwun32 9 months ago
///M
forcetoregister 1 year ago
To me C63 and M3 are exaccccccctly the same because I equally can't afford either one.
Hesam0000 1 year ago 5
go bimmer!
username2153 1 year ago
C63 AMG
juinlien 1 year ago
AMG - OMG!
pawelje 1 year ago
EVERYTHING IS GOOD: Engine, Power, Style, character, FRONT design is incredible, BUT THEY MESSED everything up with the design in the back (((((( why oh why
JohnAntonyFortune 1 year ago
Wasn't quite as precise yet as BMW, but more so than a lexus - I have nothing to add.
German cars just ROCKS.
n8neiTen8n 1 year ago
مرسيدس افضل سيارة تستحق هندستها الرائعة تقدير كل الناس
batbat0 1 year ago
look men i have many years from working in cars engineering mercedes -benz has
special improving from 1895 until 2011 its not like any car really so when we say m -b not like we say another co like bm or toyota
batbat0 1 year ago
Fuck motor trend tests!!! Real racing happens on the racetracks -- DTM,Touring cars,F1,WRC,etc.
And in those true tests, Mercedes-Benz kicks the shit out of both BMW and Lexus!!!
wawiebeastman 1 year ago
i would rather buy a Hyundai than an M3. bty BMW = Big Money Wasted
1. AMG
2. M3
3. ISF
stevomwa1 1 year ago
@stevomwa1 Ha! The M3 is MUCH better than the C63... The handling is WAY better
aeroplano111 1 year ago
@aeroplano111
nahh! coming from an M3 fun with biased view points so I dont believe. I just dont spill words just because its an M3 or an AMG. I have a reason for placing C63 AMG at top.
stevomwa1 1 year ago
Who cares...if you're driving any of one of these cars, you're winning in life.
snypanamja 1 year ago 4
it's a shame i see this car being driven by rich asian women in their 40s in the city where i live near (Richmond, BC). They probably dont even use 1% of the car's full potential.
jjson89 1 year ago
I love that merc! But this video is boring ...
yellowhurricane1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your right if ppl are looking to race they will get the ISF because most people race on straight roads anyways most. Both cars are pretty close but the ISF is a 4L V8 which is bigger than the m3. I have to say I really like the design of the ISF but lets take a look at whatsinside the cabin. I feel BMW's technology is very high like does isf have the feature that the seatbelt gets handed to you and the awsome cuphlder that come out.But dashboards the ISF KILLS , the bmw looksplain
096085 1 year ago
c63 rules i so want this car id sell a kidney to get one just kidding wouldnt go that far but id still want one
jagalarab 1 year ago
isf is the fastest
stopdropinrol 1 year ago
You're retarded.
SPMNDK89 1 year ago
Id get this one in black!
and put a fat German flag sticker on the back.
Then i would just drive around town pissing off fat americans in their escalades :P!
REving and burning out pissing people off XD!
thad be so much fun!
Howie262 1 year ago
c63 amg!!
its 6.2L is 20kg lighter than the 4.0 bmw, and has also more power and torque
controller88 1 year ago
@controller88 m156 engine weight 439lbs in the merc. SB65B40 444lbs in the BMW
20kg's? I think not. More power and torque with no chassis to handle it mean nothing.
darrylistheman 1 year ago
@darrylistheman
i'm pretty sure the difference is about 20kg. however, i will verify my stats.
More power and torque means taht MB knows how to make an engine! People says BMW's has a superior technology..i don't agree.
The 6.2L has 487cv on the C63, 525cv on E63, 571cv on SLS and AMG says, some weeks ago, that a power/torque upgrade it's even possible!
Maybe the bmw's chassis is better than the MB one, but engines not.
controller88 1 year ago
m3 all day..these 2 cars are fairly new the m3;s been doin thisw for a while...and once youve driven an m you wont want to get out
dumbluck0629 2 years ago
the bmw only get 1mpg more than the merc's 6.2 v8, the 4.0 liter on the m3 was tested to be straining the engine too much. plus on the merc u cld actually cut off some cyliners and get even bettermMPG..not bmw
MERCEDES ENGINEERING!!!
stevomwa 2 years ago 2
although I own a e46 m3 I like the C63
wishurm3 2 years ago
Spoken by a man who has never driven one and has no clue what it's like to do so.
You keep telling yourself that.
The fact that every motor related magazine, show, driver, journalist and anyone who has tried one out (me included) disagree with you don't let that put you off telling yourself what you want to hear.
In 10 years your stock civic is more likely to be electric and supercars are more likely to be a thing of the past unfortunately.
SoreHead11 2 years ago
anybody kno why mercedes amgs are labeled 63 but have a 6.2L v8?
ninjacon 2 years ago 4
IS-F all the way
Scarfaceweedman 2 years ago
AMG
604h22a 2 years ago 48
well i only can laugh...6.3 liters....what is that. thats even huge in american standards. well knowledge goes to Bmw M power and Audi who can produce the same or better in a 5 liter V10 naturally aspired(actually F1 technology) . that is 1.3 liter difference, thats enough to move a small car sporty. not to mention driving experience,on a straight line...well its all up to torque...would die in that merc without electronics. In an m5 it is simply just more enjoyable. or an m6.
hhhzzzhhhzzz 1 year ago
@hhhzzzhhhzzz The 6.2, not 6.3 is detuned in the C63. If you weren't a stuck-up asshole you'd know that the 63 produces 518HP in its most potent form.
iamidiotic 1 year ago
so it would be time now to make a rule: 5 liter vs 5liter. no turbos and stuff like that...well dont have to think too much :Bmw m5,m6 V10 natutally aspired. that is pure knowledge. give 6.3 liters to a truck please. or maybe To Mc Laren F1,(6.1) open up and u will see clearly: BMW M Power. Still the best car since 92.
hhhzzzhhhzzz 1 year ago
@604h22a IS-F has got 8 speed..
d1gps15 11 months ago
big banger of the group? yep its official, mercedes is just as gay as bmw
iCheckVtec 2 years ago
Nissan GTR is not stands for Carrera GT,for 911 GT2.Carrera GT is designed for challanging with Ferrari Enzo or Pagani Zonda or Maserati MC12
09TYPER 2 years ago
isF=416 hp
m3=414hp
kasimM08 2 years ago 2
omg m3 killed is shitty f
MrGermancarlover 2 years ago
Jap craps are about more MPG and they are nice replica of german cars. Jap cars just don't have any performance spirits in em. The good thing is jap cars enviromental friendly, hug a tree, get a battery.
mengxiaojizi 2 years ago
yeh right. And the GTR is crap too right?
idiot
SoreHead11 2 years ago 3
well its a copy of porsche so i cant be carp but its never as good as any german sport car original always better
MrGermancarlover 2 years ago
a copy of what porsche? There is no porsche that is like it.
It's more technologically advanced than anything P makes too and costs half the price of anything that can keep up with it.
Any German sports car from the 60's was better. not anymore.
SoreHead11 2 years ago
wow read some real review dumbass
MrGermancarlover 2 years ago
You mean only reviews that say what you want to hear? Every review I've ever watched or read on the GTR says it's better than anything Porsche produces with the new GT3 coming closest and that costs double.
Keep up the good comments genius.
SoreHead11 2 years ago
Comment removed
fab4603 2 years ago
copy of the 911 turbo
fab4603 2 years ago
In what way? 4 wheels? 2 doors?
So every car with 4 wheels and 2 doors that's faster than a 911 turbo is a copy then?
I'm not German car knocking. I drive a new M3 coupe and love 911's but I hate people knocking cars because they can't cope with it being faster than their fanboy brand.
There is no denying how fantastic the GTR is and it can only help by kicking P an dothers in the ass to make even better cars. Everyone wins when Nissan and others do that. Fanboys need to stop stupid comments
SoreHead11 2 years ago 23
Well obviously not a copy since the GT-R is better. But the 911 turbo was Nissan's Benchmark when making the GT-R. They both have TT, 480hp, AWD.
fab4603 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SoreHead11 no one gives a shit about you
ironintel 1 year ago
@SoreHead11 It's not about copying you dumbass, Nissan drew inspiration from the 911 which they did. The whole goal was to dethrone the 911 on the track, and they did it. There are a lot of similarities between the two, 6' turbos (although Porsche is a flat 6), AWD, even BOSE sound system. Respect to Nissan engineers though, GTR is an incredible car.
Jamzkangster 9 months ago
you make me stutter to a point where reading your horseshit makes me retarded. to think God can create such a malfunctioning retard, Christ be with you as your days come more dim and dark for being God's first mistake.
jyhighsky 2 years ago 2
lmao my Lexus, Acura and Infiniti will be doing laps around your german car while its at the dealership for its frequent problems.
maulanaMUSCLES 2 years ago
yo mean yo toyota honda and nissan hahaha fucken idiot
MrGermancarlover 2 years ago
thank yo somebody knw about cars
MrGermancarlover 2 years ago
idiot. that comment makes you sound as stupid as you obviously are. The GTR is really all about the MPG. That's why Porsche can't make anything that can keep up with it or out perform it on the Nurb. Don't talk nonsense. At least make sensible arguments. And just in case you think I'm some sort of Jap fanboy I drive a new M3 but I'm not a moron and know a great car when I see one.
SoreHead11 2 years ago
he GTR is really all about the MPG wow yo have got to be really stupid
MrGermancarlover 2 years ago
thats called sarcasm. You said the jap cars were all about the mpg idiot.
SoreHead11 2 years ago
You guys disgust me.
I would never buy a japanese car. They're disgusting. You get what you pay for. Just look at a 1980's nissan, and compare that to a 1980's mercedes. On the performance factor, sure, any retard can but a bunch of horses on a car and make it go faster 0-60, but german cars are all about balance, and TORQUE, this world that most AMERICANS don't understand.
Do you really think that 10 years from now you'd be proud of some shitty japanese car? Buy German.
BmwMakesTheBestCar 2 years ago
you got issues man... DIE and you are just another fanatic you can't see facts.. DIE
pavcon 2 years ago
its funny how u talk shit about Japanese cars and yet Japanese and American cars are the most sold cars in the world compared to german cars and have the bigger companies
airnikes164 2 years ago
Is that the same germans that came last in the JD Power survey a few years back? I'd be really proud of that alright.
American engines are all about torque moron. Also, the IS-F has WAY more torque than the M3 (which I won by the way). Before you spout rubbish from your mouth you should read some facts. You might learn something that way and not just spew nonsense.
The Nissan GTR is more balanced than a 911 which is why it laps the 'Ring faster.
You keep living in the 80's.
SoreHead11 2 years ago
please motortrend flame wiisucks lol who loves more his wii than his cars that rocks
pichurevolution 2 years ago
Bitch
pichurevolution 2 years ago
Cool car
pichurevolution 2 years ago
Faggot who loves nintendo wii below me
|
|
|
V
pichurevolution 2 years ago
Please flame wiisuckslol who loves masturbate his nintendo wii
pichurevolution 2 years ago
i love cars asshole
pichurevolution 2 years ago
You sucks lol
pichurevolution 2 years ago
Fucking butthurt
pichurevolution 2 years ago
Calm down nerd
Attesa45 2 years ago
how can any one campare a piece of shit toyota to a merc and a bmw... first off straight speed is the onything that matters, cuz i highly dought ur gonna take these cars out to a track and race?? but if you were at a red light and some guy in his ricer wanted to race.....c63 clearly the fastest.. bmw makes the best engines...and toyota should stick to rice burners
karimx93 2 years ago
Okay look at this point Is-F use 14L to 100km and Benz C63 28L to 100km. And IS-f Get almost the same performance. Plus Benz or BMW after 1 year gonna break like crap
Attesa45 2 years ago
haha... if ur looking for gas efficientcy theres other cars that will do that these cars about performance and luxary...and the isf is last when it comes to straight line speed c63,m3,rs4,isf....and i dont know if you know that a lexus is a toyota which means cheaplt assembled plastic...and comon mercedes and bmw both win top 5 engines every single year...and were do uget the fact that they break down easy there expensive for a reason..
karimx93 2 years ago
Believe me IS-F use not cheapest plastic. There is good materials. BMW maybe wins engines but BENZ? Actually Nissan have better engines than benz.
Attesa45 2 years ago
well since your such a car expert im sure your aware of the wards 10 best engines list? and if you are you should know 2008 audi,bmw,merc, were the top 3 in that order nissan being 9th and toyota 10.....im not saying the isf is horrible its just cant be compared to the other 3
karimx93 2 years ago
And I am sure you aware that Nissan's VQ engine only this engine that gets awards (even in last place). Since engine awards start. So That means VQ engine is always in top 10 in last 10 years
Attesa45 2 years ago
no one said anything about nissan being bad i own a 370z.....but nissans dont compare to mercedese and bmw plus amg engines are all hand built
karimx93 2 years ago
No, no, and no.
I highly doubt you own a 370z because you put down the car lower then Merc and BMW which is not all that true.
Just like the comparison of the G37 and the BMW 335. People choose the G37 as the winner because of micro performance difference but macro price difference. Same goes with 1 series and the 370z.
Hand built my ass.
/watch?v=bX1hhSEOHYQ watch at 6:08
c0nv1ct1337 2 years ago
the only reason i have is becuase thats mostly my sons car and he likes rice burners......you have to admit when a car is better, and yeah there good cars for there value but you cant compare german engineering for japan.....its the brand your paying for and quility....i dont own a bmw but i admit they make the best cars and engines...but i wouldnt give my e550 up for any 5 series its just prefrence...and all you guys just defend cars that you own but dont admit to which cars are truly better
karimx93 2 years ago
Once again no. I do respect German cars but you think Japanese cars are not even compariable.
Nissan GT-R. Here is Japanese engineering for you. A car for under $80,000 that outperforms ALL German rivals. The GT-R V-Spec even outperforms the mega expensive Porsche Carrera GT. No BMW vehicle stands even a slight chance against that car on a track.
c0nv1ct1337 2 years ago
Yeah but what I trying to say I think AMG is too powerful these days. BTW my brother looking to buy new C63 AMG.
Attesa45 2 years ago
just the reaction i wanted from you germans nerds. So go drive your crapy benz to warranty.
Attesa45 2 years ago
I can't understand what you saying. Maybe you should go to school? Oh wait if you from America thats mean you just go draw and play or watch in the school! HAHAHA
Attesa45 2 years ago
the IS line is the most complete line in the world in my opinion. luxury, power, looks.. everything you need. of course BMW trumps Lexus in the handling department, but come on, i test drove a 3 series and the interior looked so damn cheap like it was made in the 90s. sitting in a IS and a 3 series are 2 different worlds. the BMW dash and instrumentations were down right ugly and the leather felt like plastic. if you want luxury, lexus is the best and BMW is not even close to being on par
lextasy88 2 years ago 2
Yeah I now and 10old LS have less problems than new 7series bmw or s-class benz hahah
Attesa45 2 years ago
haha when you own one, let me know. dont call it a failure when you dont even know what you are talking about.
foreeeeitschen 2 years ago
Cool I own Toyota? C63-Crap. M/// power for grandpas
Attesa45 2 years ago
Which total failure you talk about. M3 or c63?
Attesa45 2 years ago
Benz c stands for crap. M stands for mom's car
ISF>>>>AMG>>>>M
Attesa45 2 years ago
apparently they offer a manual in the c300 sport.
MnraffaelliA4 2 years ago
WHY MB does not offer manual gearbox in their sports cars?
Guess they never meant to be true sports cars, and people who drive them to be drive oriented.
They always been more of 'Red Carpet' cars and they are #1 at it.
But BMWs always will be #1 driver's cars.
Xevisberi 2 years ago
where is the caddy
BLKNYLWGSXR 2 years ago
Nowhere. Cadilac currently has no car in this class of preformance luxury sedans. THe only car is the CTS-V and that is going against the M5 and the upcoming GS-F
LexusFman 2 years ago
Not a huge Mercedes fanatic, but this IS the one to have of the three. Completely badass.
wildmandigging 2 years ago
lol the driver position!!!
superchargedturbo 2 years ago
Why do they compare BMW and Mercedes with Lexus ?
mat19892000 2 years ago 2
BMW and mercedes-benz always have cars to compete with each other And about you asking why there comparing a lexus to a bmw and mercedes-benz is an obvous question heres your answer.
THE!!!!!! LEXUS IS_F WAS MADE TO COMPTE WITH THE BMW M3!!!!!! AND MERCEDES_BENZ C63 AMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
And the m3 in this comparison test just took out all its competition again like it always doess the m3 is evry thing you want its just the ultimate drivers car.
Towelman20 2 years ago
the c 63 is better
because more power better accelegration and more top speed and many people say that the mercedes isnt good in corners but that isnt true i saw a race on tv and there was the mercedes 0.1or 0.2 faster :D
in all tests the mercedes was better
ICEMANZIDANE 2 years ago
ure wrong
Yemoko 2 years ago
BMW M3's sales are up 999% since last year.. Out performing and out selling the C63, RS4, and IS-F
LettegusZR1 2 years ago
i dont give a fuck about m3 performance and cornering. For me it is enough just to hear that sound of that huge v8. I admit that m3 is better in cornering and has better lap times and i still dont give a fuck about m3. And i just cant get it, that people are arguing about these two cars on every video. There are two types of people obviously, people who like performance of the m3 which they cannot use on the public roads anyway, and people who just cant ignore the beast and the sound of the amg
1slovenc 2 years ago
BMW
Mercedes
Lexus
ZCP1364 2 years ago
Motortrends got a profile?! Subscribed!
jadakissboi 2 years ago
MT, take a lesson from other productions (Top Gear, etc...). Petrol heads want to hear THE CARS going around the track. The uninspired commentary is OK, but not at the expense of the motors/exhaust/tires.
rdtele 2 years ago
Check out 2nd part. The M3 r*pes the IS-F and C63 by more than 5 seconds.
SpeedKlz 2 years ago
How well your car puts out the power is one of the key factors of good performance on the track the gear raitios and the clutch and the traction control all go with alot of power really well but there is always how much torque your car puts out to much torque and not very good traction control cause your car to wheel spin and their is always FWD RWD and AWD if your car has good traction control then that helps handle the power and torque well that will make your car put out the torque alot beter
Towelman20 2 years ago
Dosent handle as well as the mighty m3 but it acelerates alot faster gets to 60mph in the low 4s that is nec breaking aceleration.
Towelman20 2 years ago
it has 2.3L capacity, 30hp and 200NM more than the BMW, of course it accelerates faster (4.5 s to 60mph not 4s) if it wouldn't you should have burned it .
All that power is wasted at the end...
It is very easy to obtain a powerfull engine .... how you put that power down is the key.
vizintini 2 years ago
Time in seconds:
154.21 -M3
158.57 -ISF
158.02 -C63
BMW ALL THE WAY!!!
vizintini 2 years ago
Yeah, lap times r all that matters.......actually not. The C63 is the best car here.
sspope 2 years ago 4
Handles like crap.
what are you talking about look at all the recorded test resaults the ctsv pushs 0.87g on a 200ft skid pad and that is incredable for a near 2 ton car.
You add the ctsv to compare against a c63 and an m3 because the ctsv doesnt compete with those cars it competes with the M5 and E63 and the ctsv kills all of them.
Towelman20 2 years ago
I watched some of the reviews and you were right. Did they improve the CTS-V drastically? Because when I drove one it didn't feel like it had good handling. Is this because the new one is much better?
watch?v=BhQb2wJVPTg
TacticalHelp 2 years ago
This review is exactly what I was saying. The clutch was weird and the handling wasnt that great but I guess the new one is a whole new story.
watch?v=fg6f0I3SLW0
this review is for the old one which is what I drove and it says what I was saying exactly. But the new one might be a different story.
TacticalHelp 2 years ago
Ehm, there is a new E-class AMG coming soon. Get rid of CTS-V and get that.
Supercharged = Fail
sspope 2 years ago
I honestly think you cant add the CTS-V in this video. I drove a CTS-V and i'm sorry to say but it handles like crap. American car makers got to step up their game. It's eighter the new Camaro will save GM or it will totally destroy them. Anyway I rather take a German car over an American car any day.
TacticalHelp 2 years ago
So your not a car lover your a brand baby.....and im sure you drove the CTS-
v...what can you tell us about how it handles?...cause all the major car mags can tell you how it handles.....so when yuo say it handles like crap your obv comparing to a sports car right? people who makes comments like yours are total morons, Baseless remarks by un-informed idiots.
Rath69 2 years ago
Yes, I did drive a CTS-V and it does handle like crap. I had a 99 E36 M3 and switching to the CTS-V I felt a lot difference between handling. Also the CTS-V's clutch didn't feel sporty it was too loose. Don't get me wrong a CTS-V is a great car all i'm saying is you cant compare it to an M3. It handles well but not enough to be compared to an M3. It's not a brand baby I will take a Z06 over a Ferrari anyday. (Price and Performance)
TacticalHelp 2 years ago
please re-read my comment to you and get back to me, "when you say it handles like crap your obv comaring to a sports car".....................if an M3 dosnt count as a sports car i dont know what does
Rath69 2 years ago
lmao " i will take a Z06 over a Ferrari anyday ". Enough said.
pulmonary 2 years ago
M3 FTW
8MunchenBayern8 2 years ago
Awesome. Mercedes is the best.
player1vladimir 2 years ago
There are two types of cars. Mercedes Benz, and all the rest.
suspendmeassholes 2 years ago
Indeed
player1vladimir 2 years ago
Its not all about the horses or torque..I wld rather have an M3 over the CL any day. It does look sickkk tho!
lovbinfr3sh 3 years ago
woah! I sooo didnt see that one coming, totally caught me by surprise. the ending was crazy, but great. loved every minute of it.
Chick6517 3 years ago
all parents did walk to school. my grandpa said he walked 10 miles uphill to get there and 10 miles uphill to get home.
chick5581 3 years ago
10 miles uphill to get there n then 10miles uphill again to get back home lol
getjynxd 3 years ago
If he walked 10 miles up hill to get there. He would have walked 10 miles down hill to get back. Not as hard as it seems walking down hill.
vovotuning 3 years ago
I wanted to hear the exhaust note, enough with the talking..
mrjost55 3 years ago
Very sexy!! I absolutely LOVE the sound of the car. I'm gonna check out some exhaust clips right now! lol
asdfgoogle 3 years ago
WOW great commentary! Nice video, loved it! Can't wait to watch the next parts.
fobdaddie 3 years ago
this was kind of pointless because how many people can actually afford these cars and if they could they probably don't watch youtube
champ1193 3 years ago 2
um. people can afford these cars. and rich people watch youtube too.
djeasyice 3 years ago
where is the CTS-V?
sloick 3 years ago
It's not in this category.
sspope 3 years ago
too bad! it should be!
elmexicandehoustone 3 years ago
Sorry, but comparing a 556 hp, 551 lb·ft car to 414 - 450 bhp cars would be just plain stupid. No, I mean retarded.
sspope 3 years ago
ahhhh
your right! i had forgotten about its new engine upgrades nd such =DD
elmexicandehoustone 3 years ago
yeah, the cts-v is too powerful lol
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
the c class is midsize luxury
the cts is large class
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
bmw > mercedes
hferreira 3 years ago 3
they're both nice carsss
but i prefer the C63
nikola723 3 years ago 2