wiki "solar cycle". note the graph titled "400 years of sunspot observations". Then compare with the C14 graph. Every little change and blip of the weather can be read from that. Including the 60's when nurses were knocking on doors of mothers to check if any children had frost bite.
'These gases absorb specific frequenciesof infrared radiation-heat- that would otherwise escape into space. They re-radiate some of that energy towards Earth's surface...more greenhouse gas in the atmosphere means less escaping and awarmer planet'
‘Studies of the Earth’s past climate tells us whenever co2 levels have risen, the planet has warmed. Since the beginn/ing of the industrial age in the 19th century, co2 levels have increased from 280ppm to 380ppm…while many factors affect our planet’s climate. There is overwhelming evidence that co2 is the prime cause of the recent warming’
You IDIOT the video uses the Vostock ice cores as evidence to to explain why co2 rise lags warming, have you even watched it? Well i doubt you understand it!
@blackadderthe4 You idiot! The numbers and the lines are there for anybody to see. Heating comes before CO2.
CO2 has not wrecked anything in the past when it was many fold higher than it will ever be today. There was never any greenhouse effect in the ice core records.
@blackadderthe4 Why do you throw your issues at me? When I say CO2 precedes heating it is the same as heating leads CO2.
If anyone came to your sites, which they don't. I'd be offering a useful lesson but here I'm only trying to bring a person who has bigoted views into this century.
Now you are on the same track that heating comes first and CO2 has no effect on heating, or any proof that it does.
'CO2 has no effect on heating, or any proof that it does' wrong!
'These gases absorb specific frequencies of infrared radiation -heat- that would otherwise escape into space. They re-radiate some of that energy towards Earth's surface...more greenhouse gas in the atmosphere means less escaping and a warmer planet'
‘Studies of the Earth’s PAST climate tells us whenever co2 levels have risen, the planet has warmed. Since the beginning of the industrial age in the 19th century, co2 levels have increased from 280ppm to 380ppm…while many factors affect our planet’s climate. There is overwhelming evidence that co2 is the prime cause of the recent warming’
Dream on! Because you don't have any evidence, other than the fantasies you have made up! Otherwise you would link the info! Hoist by your own retard!
@blackadderthe4 So you do not believe in the little ice age and you call me deluded? Get one of your kids to find it on google for you... Thats if they will do anything for you that is.
The so called MWP was only restricted to the North Atlantic area and was not GLOBAL
‘the Medieval Warm Period has known causes which explain both the scale of the warmth and the pattern..... during a time which had higher than average solar radiation and less volcanic activity (both resulting in warming)...bringing warmer seawater into the North Atlantic’
w w w .skepticalscience. c o m /medieval-warm-period.htm
@blackadderthe4 Oh really? Go on wiki. It reports world wide incidences along this timeline. Guess what it labels EXTRA volcanic activity which ought to counter the cooling. Seemingly not, like our recent four episodes.
@blackadderthe4 Once again. Said no-scientist. They have no credibility in my book from dozens of other things they have fell on their face over, time and time again. All from dogma.
Dust reflects heat and absorbs light in both directions. Any difference over what clouds produce was insubstantial. Take it from an amateur astronomer and radio ham that follows the solar record. There was no real overall change.
'Take it from an amateur' you said it! So you consider yourself BETTER than 100s of highly qualified scientists, with boat loads of data behind them! FAIL
@blackadderthe4 "AMATEUR ASTRONOMER and RADIO HAM" Lies through distortion again?
When I was paid to do *ahem* what I did for the MOD. I done it whether I believed in it or not. The police do that. Politicians are told what to vote by their whip or be deselected. Scientists get funded according to their research. etc. etc. What part of "FAIL" am I wrong here?
100's of scientists already co-opting to each other? Was it 33 that made the IPCC report? After climategate most of them done a runner.
'After climategate most of them done a runner' even if they have, which I doubt
'Climate scientists at a top UK research unit have emerged from an inquiry with their reputations for honesty intact but with a lack of openness criticised.
It concludes that 'their rigour and honesty as scientists are not in doubt'. This was one of the main charges that sceptics had levelled against CRU researchers.'
h t t p ://news.bbc. co. uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10538198.stm
@blackadderthe4 Thats the second time today sum1 has quoted the BBC who play to their masters. Maybe he will get a nobel prize and prove to me it really is a crock.
Youtube... "Globe cooling faster than anticipated and to continue over next 20-30 years says accuweather"
and "Climategate 'hide the decline' explained by Berkeley professor Richard A. Muller".
Two professionals who have their money their mouths are.
@blackadderthe4 Less climatologists. I'll buy that.. Lets climb the money tree! hahaha.
Sent quoted me to the bbc "Global warming 'confirmed' by independent study". It says:
"The project received funds from sources that back organisations lobbying against action on climate change"
And a pic of a wx sta. on concrete nr a bldg by a jet plane: "Weather stations are giving a true picture of global warming, the group found". WW2 would of see it on the end of an open damp field. AGW proven eh?
Sceptical climate scientists concede Earth has warmed
‘A group of scientists known for their scepticism about climate change has reanalysed two centuries' worth of global temperature records...study largely confirms previous ones: it finds strong evidence that Earth is getting hotter…Blogger Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That has repeatedly claimed that temperature data is unreliable’
w ww.newscientist.c om/article/dn21074-sceptical-climate-scientists-concede-earth-has-warmed.html
@blackadderthe4 I repeat again. I suggest you get an education. It is Petard, retard, lol.
Nobody argues against climate change but this lying butt monkey who expects a nobel prize has omitted any data after 2005. Sheer fail because that it when temps started to plummet.
@blackadderthe4 I suggest you get an education. It is Petard, retard, lol.
Nobody argues against climate change but this lying butt monkey who expects a nobel prize has omitted any data after 2005. Sheer fail because that it when temps started to plummet.
'I suggest you get an education' I know fine well what a petard is! One was fitted to Churchill tanks in WW!!. but it was the first explosive device used against castles, hence 'Hoist by your own peterd' because they were unstable! 'Nobody argues against climate change' well what are you doing? Flying in the face of evidence I suggest!
Stop living in the past and then trying to convince youselves that these trends will continue. The Sun is still on course to enter a Grand Minimum and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation will be cold for the next 30 years. You really need to stop spreading these lies. This propaganda, trying to pretend it is science, will be exposed as Global temperatures plummet.
So using your logic Mercury should be hotter than Venus because it's closer to the Sun, but it's not hotter because Venus has a runaway co2 greenhouse effect! Temperature is dependant on more than the output of the Sun!
@blackadderthe4 And here I am thinking that a planet with an atmosphere would be cooler, what an idiot I am. What caused this runaway greenhouse effect on Venus? was it coal and oil burning aliens?
@blackadderthe4 Put a chicken on the top shelf of an oven at 200c for one hour. Put another chicken on the bottom shelf of the same oven for 4 hours, now which one would you eat? Venus cooks longer.
Why is this goon repeating everything that has been explained away?
Ahh! Because he is trying to bury the bad news!
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
And why is your channel 'This channel is not available' what are you trying to hide?
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
Venus and Mercury, if they had powerful magnetosphere's like the Earth, temperatures (and gas constitution) would be entirely different.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
Explain?
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I will repeat again to you one last time.
wiki "solar cycle". note the graph titled "400 years of sunspot observations". Then compare with the C14 graph. Every little change and blip of the weather can be read from that. Including the 60's when nurses were knocking on doors of mothers to check if any children had frost bite.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'These gases absorb specific frequenciesof infrared radiation-heat- that would otherwise escape into space. They re-radiate some of that energy towards Earth's surface...more greenhouse gas in the atmosphere means less escaping and awarmer planet'
NewScientist
Volume 212
No 2835
Page 37
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 CO2@100% = 7% solar absorption. Piffle. Go check out the black body spectrum in space vs. what hits Earth.
Pity this guesswork is not borne out in history. CO2 precedes heating.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
‘Studies of the Earth’s past climate tells us whenever co2 levels have risen, the planet has warmed. Since the beginn/ing of the industrial age in the 19th century, co2 levels have increased from 280ppm to 380ppm…while many factors affect our planet’s climate. There is overwhelming evidence that co2 is the prime cause of the recent warming’
NewScientist
Volume 212
No 2835
Page 37
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 LIES! No scientist ever risks his credibility by saying heating precedes CO2.
Look at the Vostock ice cores. It's irrefutable.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'No scientist ever risks his credibility by saying heating precedes CO2' BOLLARDS watch this and understand it, if you're not too simple
watch?v=S8r46j2WrNk
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 If you do not wish to source direct and simple data for the same old sh*t you keep peddling me then you have no credibility.
I can spout links til the cows come home to prove my point on youtube alone!
Even climategate "scientists" agree with the vostock ice core data. Even your stupid video with the scales attempts to explain it away. BADLY!
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
Ah, you're as I guessed, a simpleton!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Hhaha! You can't even get that right. Your proof being?
I can simply say search youtube "Vostock ice core". And your idiot theories will be smashed from every angle.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
You IDIOT the video uses the Vostock ice cores as evidence to to explain why co2 rise lags warming, have you even watched it? Well i doubt you understand it!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You idiot! The numbers and the lines are there for anybody to see. Heating comes before CO2.
CO2 has not wrecked anything in the past when it was many fold higher than it will ever be today. There was never any greenhouse effect in the ice core records.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'Heating comes before CO2' You perverse ignoramus that is exactly what the video says! Are you MENTALLY CHALLENGED or what?
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You argued me you donk.
other times I used the word "precede" I'm so sorry, I had no idea it would confuse you.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'I'm so sorry' you can't help it if your thick!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Why do you throw your issues at me? When I say CO2 precedes heating it is the same as heating leads CO2.
If anyone came to your sites, which they don't. I'd be offering a useful lesson but here I'm only trying to bring a person who has bigoted views into this century.
Now you are on the same track that heating comes first and CO2 has no effect on heating, or any proof that it does.
Game over!
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'CO2 has no effect on heating, or any proof that it does' wrong!
'These gases absorb specific frequencies of infrared radiation -heat- that would otherwise escape into space. They re-radiate some of that energy towards Earth's surface...more greenhouse gas in the atmosphere means less escaping and a warmer planet'
NewScientist
Volume 212
No 2835
Page 37
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You repeat again.
Yes CO2 Does absorb 7% in one single narrow band of Infra red. WOW! Big diddums. No wonder massive levels of CO2 had no effect in times past.
God will rain angels down on us and life will cease to exist like never before. haha.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'CO2 had no effect in times past' WRONG
‘Studies of the Earth’s PAST climate tells us whenever co2 levels have risen, the planet has warmed. Since the beginning of the industrial age in the 19th century, co2 levels have increased from 280ppm to 380ppm…while many factors affect our planet’s climate. There is overwhelming evidence that co2 is the prime cause of the recent warming’
NewScientist
Volume 212
No 2835
Page 37
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 There you go. In denial to what you have just agreed on. The record is stuck.
The industrial age of the 19C was so tiny on the scale of things today as to be not worth talking about on a global scale.
However, the graphs show warming started 350years ago. Which amazingly puts CO2 exactly where it belongs today.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
Dream on! Because you don't have any evidence, other than the fantasies you have made up! Otherwise you would link the info! Hoist by your own retard!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 It's all over the internet. You cannot argue it has not been warming constantly since the Maunder minimum. Nobody argues it.
Only you. HOISTED by your OWN PETARD!
Not "retard" you dope!
m1aws 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 So you do not believe in the little ice age and you call me deluded? Get one of your kids to find it on google for you... Thats if they will do anything for you that is.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
The so called MWP was only restricted to the North Atlantic area and was not GLOBAL
‘the Medieval Warm Period has known causes which explain both the scale of the warmth and the pattern..... during a time which had higher than average solar radiation and less volcanic activity (both resulting in warming)...bringing warmer seawater into the North Atlantic’
w w w .skepticalscience. c o m /medieval-warm-period.htm
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Oh really? Go on wiki. It reports world wide incidences along this timeline. Guess what it labels EXTRA volcanic activity which ought to counter the cooling. Seemingly not, like our recent four episodes.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'EXTRA volcanic activity which ought to counter the cooling' rubbish!
'Mount Pinatubo in the Phillipines in 1991, the planet cools..'
NewScientist
Volume 212
No 2835
Page 38
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Once again. Said no-scientist. They have no credibility in my book from dozens of other things they have fell on their face over, time and time again. All from dogma.
Dust reflects heat and absorbs light in both directions. Any difference over what clouds produce was insubstantial. Take it from an amateur astronomer and radio ham that follows the solar record. There was no real overall change.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'Take it from an amateur' you said it! So you consider yourself BETTER than 100s of highly qualified scientists, with boat loads of data behind them! FAIL
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 "AMATEUR ASTRONOMER and RADIO HAM" Lies through distortion again?
When I was paid to do *ahem* what I did for the MOD. I done it whether I believed in it or not. The police do that. Politicians are told what to vote by their whip or be deselected. Scientists get funded according to their research. etc. etc. What part of "FAIL" am I wrong here?
100's of scientists already co-opting to each other? Was it 33 that made the IPCC report? After climategate most of them done a runner.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'After climategate most of them done a runner' even if they have, which I doubt
'Climate scientists at a top UK research unit have emerged from an inquiry with their reputations for honesty intact but with a lack of openness criticised.
It concludes that 'their rigour and honesty as scientists are not in doubt'. This was one of the main charges that sceptics had levelled against CRU researchers.'
h t t p ://news.bbc. co. uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10538198.stm
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Thats the second time today sum1 has quoted the BBC who play to their masters. Maybe he will get a nobel prize and prove to me it really is a crock.
Youtube... "Globe cooling faster than anticipated and to continue over next 20-30 years says accuweather"
and "Climategate 'hide the decline' explained by Berkeley professor Richard A. Muller".
Two professionals who have their money their mouths are.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
And where do CC demiers get their evidence from?
watch?v=1gLSnrM6iEw
watch?v=noSvYSrhgEk
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Less climatologists. I'll buy that.. Lets climb the money tree! hahaha.
Sent quoted me to the bbc "Global warming 'confirmed' by independent study". It says:
"The project received funds from sources that back organisations lobbying against action on climate change"
And a pic of a wx sta. on concrete nr a bldg by a jet plane: "Weather stations are giving a true picture of global warming, the group found". WW2 would of see it on the end of an open damp field. AGW proven eh?
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
Sceptical climate scientists concede Earth has warmed
‘A group of scientists known for their scepticism about climate change has reanalysed two centuries' worth of global temperature records...study largely confirms previous ones: it finds strong evidence that Earth is getting hotter…Blogger Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That has repeatedly claimed that temperature data is unreliable’
w ww.newscientist.c om/article/dn21074-sceptical-climate-scientists-concede-earth-has-warmed.html
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Yes, what about it apart from confirming it will increase CO2 in the atmosphere. As a GW gas, lets do some approximate maths.
Man made CO2 say 7%
Absorption by CO2 bands now around 50%
light bandwidth to be absorbed is also around 7%
So assuming 100% absorption at those bands will equal 0.07x0.07X0.5= less than one quarter of one percent.
you've been had my friend. Wanna buy my heirloom watch from Aldi?
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
I repeat, 'that back organisations lobbying AGAINST action on climate change' Hoist by your own retard. again!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blackadderthe4 I repeat again. I suggest you get an education. It is Petard, retard, lol.
Nobody argues against climate change but this lying butt monkey who expects a nobel prize has omitted any data after 2005. Sheer fail because that it when temps started to plummet.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
YES 'that back organisations lobbying AGAINST action on climate change' Hoist by your own retard. again!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I suggest you get an education. It is Petard, retard, lol.
Nobody argues against climate change but this lying butt monkey who expects a nobel prize has omitted any data after 2005. Sheer fail because that it when temps started to plummet.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'I suggest you get an education' I know fine well what a petard is! One was fitted to Churchill tanks in WW!!. but it was the first explosive device used against castles, hence 'Hoist by your own peterd' because they were unstable! 'Nobody argues against climate change' well what are you doing? Flying in the face of evidence I suggest!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Google "wiki/File:Carbon-14_with_activity_labels".
Funny how the Sun dictates the climate. Who would of guessed that???? lol
m1aws 4 months ago
Stop living in the past and then trying to convince youselves that these trends will continue. The Sun is still on course to enter a Grand Minimum and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation will be cold for the next 30 years. You really need to stop spreading these lies. This propaganda, trying to pretend it is science, will be exposed as Global temperatures plummet.
david222444 5 months ago
@david222444
So using your logic Mercury should be hotter than Venus because it's closer to the Sun, but it's not hotter because Venus has a runaway co2 greenhouse effect! Temperature is dependant on more than the output of the Sun!
blackadderthe4 5 months ago
@blackadderthe4 And here I am thinking that a planet with an atmosphere would be cooler, what an idiot I am. What caused this runaway greenhouse effect on Venus? was it coal and oil burning aliens?
david222444 5 months ago
@blackadderthe4 The daylength of venus is 4 times that of mercury yet it is only a few degree warmer, looks like co2 is cooling it to me.
david222444 5 months ago
@david222444
But yet Mercury is closer to the Sun and co2 has been recognised as a GHG for something like a 100 years! So how is it cooling Venus?
blackadderthe4 5 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Put a chicken on the top shelf of an oven at 200c for one hour. Put another chicken on the bottom shelf of the same oven for 4 hours, now which one would you eat? Venus cooks longer.
david222444 5 months ago
@david222444
Because heats rises, it would seem that you have a blind spot were simple science is concerned! And just in case you don’t believe co2 is a GHG
watch?v=r0tJEkldmf4
blackadderthe4 5 months ago
Frumibandersnatch was here....
for no reason, apparently.
Roy Spencer Rules!!!!!
Frumibandersnatch 6 months ago
@Frumibandersnatch
Well actually thre is no reason for Frumibandersnatch, as we all know!
blackadderthe4 6 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Just to be a thorn in your side, that is reason enough.
Frumibandersnatch 6 months ago
@Frumibandersnatch
You're not even batting. Infact you are not even out of the pavilion!
blackadderthe4 6 months ago
Energy is also a waveform - jet streams are waveforms.
For certain more amplitude
Uncertain is results.
PacificCircle1 10 months ago