@eviilhomerr no becuse they was holy both but mohammed (SW) was more ... and they dont arrange b-day -.- ..... we love imam ali and all of ahlulbait there you got your answar
آنحضرت ﷺ نے فرمایا: میری امت پر اضطراب اور انتشار کا ایک ایسا شدید زمانہ بھی آئے گا کہ لوگ اپنے علماء کے پاس (راہنمائی کی امید سے)جائیں گے تو کیا دیکھیں گے کہ وہ بند ر اور سؤر ہیں۔ (منتخب کنزالعمال۔الفرع الثانی فی ذکراشراطہاالکبریٰ جلد 6صفحہ 28۔بر حاشیہ مسند احمد بن حنبل۔ دارالفکر للطباعتہ والنشر مصر)
حاكميتى كه بر اساس چماق و ظلم و تجاوز به حقوق ديگران و تصرف غاصبانه و تغيير در آراء آنان و كشتن و بستن و بازداشت ... (باشد) نزد شرع و عقل و عقلاء جهان محكوم و بىارزش است
Watch this Trilogy series regarding the Holy Prophet[sawa] and his auspicious Family; and spread this to the believer in faith. The others are trying to lower its ratings, for its contents are too strong for them to digest:
i dont know why you call your self muslim, u are a just dirty shia people. You doing party in a mosque, are u in mind?? U are just like the beni israel. The changed allway the scipture and the message of their profets, u shia u are doing the same. To hell with u
tsk tsk tsk wat can we say u are some dumb yokel who cant even spell his name what by calling people who love ahlul bait the family of prophet muhammed ? hahahah and yet you call your self a muslim shame on you KUFFAR!
hahahahhaah my sunni friend i am not as ignorant as you are so i wont say anything offensive towards you but who was the cousin,first male islamic believer and son in law of the prophet mohammed (pbuh) Imam Ali, so i hope that gives you can understand why we are shia, oww and did abu bakr's son become a martyr for the sake of islam? or did Imam Ali's and didnt the prophet mohammed (pbuh) say Hussein is of me and I am of Hussein? well hope you enjoy hell salam.
abu bakers son was not any random person he was one of imam al's (a.s) closest friends and he died for justice and ali in a way wer wen they killed him the stufed him into a donkeys stomach and burned him and the donkey...u dnt see these things so u dnt believe......we love his son cos he died for justice and truth...and didnt the prophet s.a.w. say al hak m3 ali wa ali m3 al hak...meaning the truth is always wid ali and ali is always with truth
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
تو معلومه وقتی محمد دزد به ایران حمله کرد سپاهش جملگی همه مادر جندتو از کس وکون گایدندو توخواهر کسه رااز کون پس انداخته.کس خواهر تو و پیامبر و12 امام دزد بیناموس. ما ایران را اسلام کثیف ازاد میکنیم.
@fermisk 'What is wrong with the language? The only thing un tolerable there is the clapping of the hands, that is not what any Muslim, let Shias do in prayers, esp. in mosques, but, the Iranians introduce this every where and we do not like them to introduce in our places of worship.
@sanaabegum This is the difference between Sunnite Islam & Shi'ite Islam. In Shi'ite Islam there is this sense of continual love & mourning for holy infalliable Ahlol Bayht, peace be upon Them All. Allah (God) has totally cleansed Ahlol Bayht of all sin! They are the perfect pure source from which we can follow the truth. The holy infalliable Prophet of Islam, Mohammad, peace be upon Him & His Family, is also pure, free from any error, just as the Holy Koran is.
Too Iran nemishe sazo navaz zad,,,nemishe raghsid,,,,baraye hamin ham ba dast zadan baraye ali o hosseino amsaale inha khodeshoon ro erza mikonan,,,,,moteassefam baraye mamlekatemoon,,,heif,,,,Khode ma bishtarin dokhtari ke toor mikardaim too mahe Moharram bood,,,,hamin yaroo rishoo e ke dare nohe mikhoone shab paye baste Teryake,,,, begoo Ziad film bazi nakone ,,,,,,,
پناه میبرم به خدا از شیطان !! شما که دقیقاً دارید همان کاری را که شیطان در زمان مولی علی میکرد و اصل فلسفه جهاد حضرتش با سیستم معاویه و یزیدبخاطر همان دجالگریها و عوام سازی و عوامفریبی بود میکنید!!این برداشت مدرن و باصطلاح «به روز » از اسلام نیست بلکه ادامه بقای فقر و فقرائ زمان ما و چپاولگران و نوادگان حقیقی معاویه و ابوسفیان است. سیستم های صوتی و تصویری شما و ریتم ها و شاید در آینده رقصهایی هم که مجاز بدانید بازار شکست خورده سرمایه داران و صنایع غرب و غیر مسلمان را رونق میدهد نه دین وغقیده را!
thats right.. we shia die for our religon and its rasool.. yet wahabis are here fightig eachother and killing all muslims and say they saving the islam.. alalh swt save his shia and punishthose who kill our shia
قل يا الله يا مشرك ولا تقول يامحمد فما بالك ب علي الاقل منزله ومكانة من محمد صلوات الله وسلامة عليه واله انتم تشركون بالله من حيث لاتعلمون قال صلى الله عليه واله وسلم [إن العبد ليتكلم بالكلمة من سخط الله لا يلقي لها بالا تهوي به سبعين خريفا في نار جهنم]
Hey there, would it be possible to talk about something other than religion, or just not mention it at all? Seriously, it's 2008 people, time for you guys to let go of your centuries-old fiction and take a real good hard look at the destruction religious idiots cause! Religion segregates people, and for no reason should religion and politics ever leak into each other, that includes law. MORALITY CAN EXIST WITHOUT FEAR! LONG LIVE REALITY! LONG LIVE GENUINELY GOOD PEOPLE!
u talk about reality, eh? Brother, to you, seriously its 2008!! time for you to do the reality check before its too late, no offense or anything, but as long as Satan will be your s**t, you'll be away from the REAL REALITY!
My user name was a joke. Satan doesn't exist. Silly child.
Yeah, that's what I said! You have the mind set of a child!
Hell is a fabrication. And you are stupid to believe it exists. Do you believe in unicorns and leprechauns? What about if everyone else around you thought they were real?
Answer honestly and you will see the truth. You are a sheep. You have no thought of your own, you just adopt the thought patterns of the people around you.
(continuation of below) This reply starts 4 pages behind this one: i.e. if this is page 1 that you are currently on, then this reply starts on page 4.
P.S
I'm sorry for any inconveniences caused by me having to keep fragmenting my argument into little boxes; but the space which youtube provides for us to be able to post a message really is too short for this kind of situation.
Salam to all those who read this message; below you will see another message whch i have just posted with the beginning having written: (part 32). This (part 32), which is below, is the continuation of a reply to a friend called 'wisdomuser'; in which i put forth an extremely logical argument, through the use of logical questions - through which i hope to have opened "wisdomuser's" eyes to the truth.
(part 32)I pray to Allah (S.W.T), that insha Allah (S.W.T: the simple questions of simple logic which are based on your own religious books; will have insha Allah guided you to the truth and opened your eyes to it.
(part 31) correct one, by being appointed by the 1st; then why is it that the 1st and 3rd khalifas could not be appointed as the Khalifa of the Muslims in the same way? Similarly, if the method of appointing the third khalifa was the correct one, then why was it that this same method was not used for the first two khalifas.
(part 30) an election in which: the public had no role, there were only 6 candidates, and the khalifa was to be chosen by the 6 candidates alone. Hence, the question is simply: "If the method of appointing the first khalifa was the correct one - by 'apparently' giving the freedom to elect the khalifa to the people, then why was it then that the second and third khalifas could not be elected as the khalifa of the Muslims in the same way? If the method of appointing the second khalifa was the
(part 29) preventing them from choosing their next khalifa by themselves. Lets now go one step further and pretend that although the first to methods of appointing the first two khalifas completely oppose one another; they were still acceptable and 'correct' methods of appointing the first two khalifas of the final religion of Allah (S.W.T) revealed to mankind. If this is the case, then: if the first two methods were correct, then why was it that the 3rd Khalifa was brought to power by winning
(part 28) Rasoolollah (S.A.W) left no successor to his 25 year complete struggle, but rather the first khalifa was to be appointed through the 'correct' method of an 'free election', but then Omar (the 2nd khalifa) comes to power by being appointed as the successor of Abu Bakr - and so already completely opposing the first method of choosing the leader of the Muslims: the first method 'apparently' gave the freedom to elect to the people, the second method took the freedom from the people --
(part 28) Rasoolollah (S.A.W) left no successor to his 25 year complete struggle, but rather the first khalifa was to be appointed through the 'correct' method of an 'free election', but then Omar (the 2nd khalifa) comes to power by being appointed as the successor of Abu Bakr - and so already completely opposing the first method of choosing the leader of the Muslims: the first method 'apparently' gave the freedom to elect to the people, the second method took the freedom from the people --
(part 27) question; which is as follows: "If the way in which Abu Bakr became khalifa was the 'correct' method, and it was a 'truly' free election left to the people; then why is it that for the appointment of Omar Ibne AlKhataab as the second khalifa; the same method was not used - but rather not only were the people not allowed to elect their khalifa; they were enforced to accept Ibne Al Khataab as the successor of the first khalifa. Hence, already up to this we see that: 'apparently'
(part 26) questions proved to the logical mind that Rasoolollah had appointed Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) as his successor; this final question clearly proves to the simplest of minds how the whole way in which the first 3 Khalifas came to power was wrong in itself. My question is a simple question based not on evidence, or on any sort of necessary intelligence, but rather it is a question based simply on logic - and so i will not go on to explain it, but rather i will simply leave it at the
(part 25) that we can even put this of the so many points proving the successorship of Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) aside. While we are at that i will even pretend for the sake of your beliefs that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) did not appoint a successor to continue his lifelong efforts and simply left it to a 'simple' election. Dear wisdomuser, my last question does not even require these clear evidences; because of the fact that although all my other
(part 24) interpretation in order to fragment the Muslims amongst themselves, and to ruin their unity. Although, one would believe that up to this stage even the least of 'wisdomusers' would have been completely enlightened and opened their eyes to the truth, i will still proceed to make my fourth and final question. Dear wisdomuser, although the magnificent event of Ghadeer is an undisputable one in the history of humanity as well as the history of Islam, for this last question i will pretend
(part 23) than his successor in this magnificent event - and so himself also following the command given to him by the All-Mercifull Allah. And so, dear wisdomuser, if you are truly are what you claim to be - a 'wisdomuser', then i am certain that you will agree with me that the people who suggested their own interpretations of the words of Rasoolollah (S.A.W)on the day magnificent day of Ghadeer, were suggesting these interpretations out of pure ignorance, or that they were suggesting this
(part 22) is: Oh Muhammed, if you do not appoint a successor to continue the teachings of your religion, then it is as if you have not preached the message of Allah at all), and the fact that his death was nearing; would be the only logical interpretation, which is: The Holy Prophet of Islam had used the word 'mawla' in his beautiful statement on the magnificent day of Ghadeer; with the most suitable intended meaning of 'master', as Rasoolollah (S.A.W) was most obviously appointing no one other
(part 21) would comprehend from all of this; that The Holy Prophet of Islam, Muhammed (S.A.W) would not ask such a thing of all the people present, and would not emphasize the importance of the words he was speaking on that day in the way he did; unless the words that he was speaking were of extreme significance. Hence, judging on the Islamic situation of Rasoolollah; in terms of the latest Ayat of the Quran which had been revealed to him before this event (the English interpretation of which
(part 20) he (S.A.W) was the cousin, then Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) was also his cousin. I mean honestly, would it even make sense to the mind of a mere 8 year old - that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) who had such a great care for all the people, and for all creations of Allah (S.W.T) alike; would command them as their Prophet: to wait and listen to him tell them that whomsoever he (S.A.W) was the cousin of, then Ali Ibne Abi Talib was also his cousin. Hence, one with at least the least logic of minds
(part 19) like you all to think that: how could such a man who had such conduct with all people, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, who would worry so much that the poor and needy and all those in distress were being cared for ---- how such a man could command 115000 - 125000 people (according to your own religious books); amongst whom there were also were very old people, to endure the scorching heat of the Arabian sun in the Hajj period of the Islamic calendar; just to tell them that whomsoever
(part 18) absolutely shocked as to why on earth Rasoolollah (S.A.W) was being so very nice to her, when she had tormented him every single day he had came to visit the mosque. So the old lady asked Rasoolollah (S.A.W) what the religion was which he preached, and she found that it was Islam. Hence, because or Rasoolollah's (S.A.W) display of the true Islamic character; the old lady converted to Islam. Now that we have at least a slight insight into the character of Rasooloollah (S.A.W)I would
(part 17) of Islam, Muhammed (S.A.W), had come to punish her for all the times that she had showered him with rubbish on his way to the mosque, and for all the rouble that she had caused him. However, to her surprise Rasoolollah (S.A.W) inquired as to how she was feeling, and whether she required anything (any medicine or shopping) that he would get for her, and continued to treat the old lady with the best of human conduct (which is the Islamic conduct). On seeing this the old lady was
(part 16) and had chosen not to leave her house. At hearing this; Rasoolollah was severely emotionally hurt, and straight away got the address of this old lady to go and visit her (Because of the fact that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) personally practised every single thing he preached, and he preached that a Muslims should visit the ill). Once arriving at her house, the old lady discovered that it was Rasoolollah (S.A.W) at her doorstep at felt extremely frightened; as she thought that The Holy Prophet
(part 15) One day when Rasoolollah (S.A.W) visited the Mosque, he noticed that the old lady who would throw rubbish at him every time he would visit the Mosque was not there. Hence, Rasoolollah (S.A.W) set about asking the people why the old lady had not been there, and whether anything had happened to her. As a result of asking many people, Rasoolollah discovered that the reason the old lady had not been there to throw rubbish at him that day; was because of the fact
(part 14)tell you a story to you about the noble character of Holy Prophet Muhammed, so that you and the others who read this may know him for his 'true character' at least to the slightest of extents: There was a certain Mosque in the state of Islam which Rasoolollah (S.A.W) would visit everyday. Whenever Rasoolollah (S.A.W) would visit this Mosque, there was always an old lady (who was not Muslims) who would always wait for him in the path of the Mosque, and throw rubbish at Rasoolollah
(part 13)because of the very fact that they make their own assertions and interpretations of Rasoolollah's (S.A.W) words and claim to be Muslims when they do not even know the beautiful and noble character of Rasoolollah (S.A.W). Anyone, who even has the slightest idea of the character of Rasoolollah Muhammed (S.A.W); know that he was not a man who would ever be the cause fo any trouble for others, who would always practise kindness towards others, and would always try to help others. I wish to
(part 12) stating that what Rasoolollah (S.A.W) by those beautiful words was that whomsoever he was the cousin of, then Ali was also his cousin. However, the reason that i say that this argument put forth by some Muslims amongst us is absolutely ignorant; is because of the fact that the actual people who suggested this whole interpretation and caused this whole dilemma, were not actually even Muslims themselves, but, rather they were hypocrites (munafiqs). I say that these people were hypocrites
(part 11)also his cousin. Before one goes onto reply to this childish statement, one must first understand the meaning of the word "mawla" in the Arabic language, and one must also truly know the character, and conduct with the people, of Rasoolollah(S.A.W). In the Arabic language the word "mawla" has 29 meanings which can be derived from it; a few of which are 'cousin', 'master', 'slave'. Hence, by simply basing the argument on this little information alone, one would not be wrong at all in
(part 10)following: "Oh people whomsoever I am his "MAWLA", then Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) is also his leader.....". Now, the point which has been used by some of the enemies of Islam to prevent some of us from opening up our eyes and seeing the truth about the event of Ghadeer, is the following: when Rasoolollah (S.A.W) said that "Oh people whomsoever I am his MAWLA, then Ali Ibne Abi Talib is also his MAWLA"; what Rasoolollah meant was that: whomsoever Rasoolollah is the cousin of, then Ali is
(part 9)to go forwards and call all the men back, and then he instructed all the Muslims left to wait where they were until all those who were still coming back from the Ka'aba had arrived, and all those that had gone ahead had returned. Once everyone was present, and in your most valuable religious books, it has been narrated that the number of Muslims who had been gathered at this gathering was around 115000 - 125000 people. And of course as you should know, Rasoolollah went on to say the
(part 8)which is this: "what happened to the successorship of Ali (A.S) at Ghadeer e khum?"
You have the event of Ghadeer mentioned in every single one of your religious books, yet look how simply you neglect it, and so neglect the truth. My friend at Ghadeer e khum, during the return of Hajj, Rasoolollah S.A.W) made a great pile of sandals using all the sandals of the people present, and then he went up this 'mountain' of sandals and instructed a group of Muslims from the gathering present
(part 7)clearly that we are not even legible to make a decision over the most pettiest of things without Allah (S.W.T) without Allah (S.W.T) guiding us, yet the successor to the greatest as well as the final religion sent to man by God (S.W.T) should simply be left down to an election.
Well, in all due respect, i don't know what you are thinking, but to the most basic of logical minds i am sure that that would sound absolutely ridiculous.
Now, dear wisdomuser i move onto pose my third question
(part 6)the successor to the seal of the prophets should be. Than why is it that in such an extremely important religion; it should not be Allah (S.W.T), the creator of man and this religion, who should choose who the successor of Rasoolollah (S.W.T) should be, it should not be Rasoolollah (S.W.T) who should decide who his successor to the religion he sacrificed his life in order to establish should be, but rather it should simply be left down to the people in order to choose - when we know
(part 5)of Islam ('the' final revelation to mankind by Allah (S.W.T) is outsmarted by his simple successor: who had at least appointed himself a successor.
That is just my first point. My second question oh wisdomuser is that: "If Islam is the true last religion sent to mankind by God, and we as Muslims believe that man does not have the sufficient knowledge to decide on small petty things by himself without the help of his Lord - let alone to make decisions on such massive things such as who
(part 4)anything in his reign which took much from his life, yet, Rasoolollah (S.A.W) who put so much more than even his blood, sweat, teeth, and tears into the establishment of the religion of Islam itself - let alone its state; did not even think about appointing himself a successor.
My brother in humanity, verily the answer to this Question, which is the logical question one reaches after studying your beliefs, is NO, for verily this cannot be the case; where the appointer of the Religion
(part 3)could it really be that; AbuBakr who faced no problems in just 3 years of his reign, and had made no establishments whatsoever ((all the establishments that had been made for Islam, had already been made in Rasoolollah's (S.A.W) time; which Abu Bakr just continued - of course the difficulty of which Rasoolollah (S.A.W)had to suffer)) was intelligent enough to establish himself a successor; considering the fact that he did not even need to worry about doing so as he had not really done
(part 1)Dear Wisdomuser, may Allah (S.W.T) guide you to the right path insha Allah. Please just take a moment to think about it: according to your beliefs; then Abu Bakr is even greater than Rasoolollah (S.A.W) (honestly think about it please), because how is that Rasoolollah (S.W.T) spent 25 years of his life, endured the greatest of all pains in these 25 years (we all believe that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) endured the greatest pain from amongst all the prophets; only for the sake of Allah (S.W.T)and
(part 2)establishment of Islam. And so my question is this dear wisdomuser: "How is it that it reach Rasoolollah (S.A.W) intelligence to leave behind a successor who will guide Islam after him, and to protect all the establishments he had achieved after 25 years, yet, Abu Bakr was intelligent enough to place a successor to protect the establishments he had made in his simple 3 year reign (in which the Islamic state had barely any problems whatsoever for him to face). I mean just think about it:
Just shut up , you are not Iranians, do not speak persian, you do not deserve it,go back to your arabia or wherever.Filthy muslims.You have distroyed Iran, get the xxx out of Iran.
If you say so you every people had their own religion before islam. Turks had schamanism, persians had zoroastrianism, arab had an other to, decis had another different too. but theese people have understood the right meaning of life. it have nothing to do with arabism my friend its to be human and this practice is a role in it. god bless shia iranians!
The philosophy of Islam is anti-iranian,if you do not know that ,read the soore" Al_room".Please wake up and know one thing: No iranian is a muslim and no muslim is an iranian.Every soore in Quran is a product of Mohammad himself and Salman (his mentor), and not the true Gud.Gud is not stupid to name Mohammad and Salman his/her messenger.Please read Quran fully before you accept it.The problem with all muslim people is that they first accept then read Quran, this is wrong my friend.
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
who's got the xxx to iran? saudi Arabia which is providing Quran with all the languages translations, or the Imam khumaini who, allowed what Allah has forbiden?.
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
sa mumineen why do ppl care how we do things. let us clean our hearts an d minds and pray to allah swt for forgiveness and pray that our judgment sends us to jenna insha allah... lailaha and long live the message of our beloved ahlyl beit
what the hell is wrong with those ppl ali dead 1400 years ago..islam still alive ((and for who ever say ya ali madad)) ali is dead he ((CANT)) HELP U...if u wana go to heavens follow islam man
for example if im a christian and if i vant to learn some things about islam and one shia ofer mee to acept islam (convert in islam) with these video records, with these brain trance music?
I will hate somethin like this and i will be afraid of these kind of "muslims"
hello, mr. Vanna be a Kristian; and oh yeah Genius, it's want and not Vant. And second of all, If you're gonna be afraid of something as beautiful as this you seriously need to see a psychiatrist, coz bro you're psycho - either you're you've crashed your head against somewhere real hard in the course of your petiful life; which has lead your head to work in reverse - i.e , you see beautiful as ugly, and ugly as beautiful.
oh thanke you mr sagedarekhuneyehosse but if i want to be a real psycho i will foll these loosers like you and your imams but elhamdulilah i acept islam from sunni brothers poore ISLAM without psycho-trance,mixin male and female like in these psycho-trance party (discustin) eudubiLah.
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
Or, you were simply born like this, and if that's the case it's not your fault to such an extent, what can either of us say man, it's just simply in your genes.
Anyways, Sayed Ali.K, wonderful video you've enclosed here- and i apologise on behalf of this 'Vanna be Kristian' and the likes of him, for being allowed to have the privillege of watching these 'vonderful wideows'..
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
Cant the son of your enemy kill your son just because of the differences between you and your enemy even when your son is not responsible for anything and is just killed, because your enemy wanted his son to kill your son?
Think! If you dont get in the first place, Think again....and again....yet again... before you put up any stupid or irrational remarks!
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
The best way to prevent this social and political cancer cell (Islam) from spreading in our Iranin society is to educate your kids, family and your society;
Iranian society is dying because of this social cancer,
This be-sharaf Mirdamad is playing with your kid's lovely emotion.
ya ali madad? it should be more like ya allah madad to all this people check out the hindus way of pray u would be surprise how similiar this video is with thier festival it is called (BHAJAN)muslims soppose to be diffrent than any other religion.but people have changed for thier own satisfaction n will,may allah bless everyone right or wrong
You are so ignorant and stupid. They are not singing for money. If they really wanted money and they can sing, it would make more sense for them to become pop singers and make lots more money.
You are such a fool, I feel so sorry for you, because this ignorance that you have will only lead you to despair on the day of judgment
This has been flagged as spam show
What a wise old man! Such profundity ! Such depth of feeling and understanding ! A true genius!
He is indeed an example to us all.
hierostratus 3 months ago
Why do you do this? Did Mohammad saws do this about the birthday of his cousin?
eviilhomerr 6 months ago
@eviilhomerr no becuse they was holy both but mohammed (SW) was more ... and they dont arrange b-day -.- ..... we love imam ali and all of ahlulbait there you got your answar
iniestafcbarcelona 5 months ago
Ya Ali molla .veladate emam Ali ro be hameye ashghaneh emam Ali tabrik migam.
xiraniranx 7 months ago
YA ALI !!! GREETINGS FROM THE MOUNTAINS OF KURDISTAN !!!
MezgirAPOci62 9 months ago
mashallah
cliffeful 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
آنحضرت ﷺ نے فرمایا: میری امت پر اضطراب اور انتشار کا ایک ایسا شدید زمانہ بھی آئے گا کہ لوگ اپنے علماء کے پاس (راہنمائی کی امید سے)جائیں گے تو کیا دیکھیں گے کہ وہ بند ر اور سؤر ہیں۔ (منتخب کنزالعمال۔الفرع الثانی فی ذکراشراطہاالکبریٰ جلد 6صفحہ 28۔بر حاشیہ مسند احمد بن حنبل۔ دارالفکر للطباعتہ والنشر مصر)
daniaal96 1 year ago
why are they clapping? isnt it meant to be sineh zani?
jazab99 1 year ago
@jazab99
No its a joyful occasion, celebrating birth of Imam Ali
samk786110 1 year ago
@jazab99 ..no...no one has died on this day...its a birthday..
manchesterbullion 9 months ago
VERY NICE MASHALLAH
kukuqqq 2 years ago
يااااااحسيييييييييييين
dr3alshia 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
das würd ich mir nichtmal antun wenn ich taub wär *kotz*
quaminator 2 years ago
Das ist nicht zur Unterhaltung gedacht.
SIe preisen die Propheten und den Imam Hussein.
Natürlich ist, dass hier nichts für den Westen. Nichts für Leute die MTV schauen.
poetologie84 2 years ago 2
@poetologie84 naja eigentlich gehts eher um imam ali!
mehditalib 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stupid!!
satlehashghal 2 years ago
حسین پارتی..............
Afkare9 2 years ago
ya Ali
poppy7771 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
حاكميتى كه بر اساس چماق و ظلم و تجاوز به حقوق ديگران و تصرف غاصبانه و تغيير در آراء آنان و كشتن و بستن و بازداشت ... (باشد) نزد شرع و عقل و عقلاء جهان محكوم و بىارزش است
sybertime2000 2 years ago
ya imam ali
mustafaliargentina 2 years ago 3
Shiye Yani Eshgh Bazi Ba Khoda.!!!
Ya Ali...
navidkb99 2 years ago
Allah o Akbar, Khomeini Rahbar.
AyatollahKhomeini123 2 years ago
Mullah regime is at the end! Are you ready?
satlehashghal 2 years ago
lol never coming 2 AN END!!!
hanonah1115 1 year ago
kheeili maamnon az video fogholade ghashangeton, be hameye pedaraneh khobe jahan tabrik migam roze tavalode emam ali ro.
ya ali madad
xiraniranx 2 years ago
Brothers and sisters:
Watch this Trilogy series regarding the Holy Prophet[sawa] and his auspicious Family; and spread this to the believer in faith. The others are trying to lower its ratings, for its contents are too strong for them to digest:
watch?v=1Ge_iMBX-ko&feature=channel
MAFHHZB 2 years ago
Why are you collaborating with the Crusaders in Iraq
covertbabo11 2 years ago
nice to see hadadian, karimi,mirdamad and banifateme all together..
great video
Hussain786K110 2 years ago 9
i dont know why you call your self muslim, u are a just dirty shia people. You doing party in a mosque, are u in mind?? U are just like the beni israel. The changed allway the scipture and the message of their profets, u shia u are doing the same. To hell with u
ss02z471 2 years ago
Comment removed
navidkb99 2 years ago
ya imam ali
kandyyy123 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SHIRK KUFFAR KUFFAR KUFFAR KUFFAR
beingforitse1f 3 years ago
tsk tsk tsk wat can we say u are some dumb yokel who cant even spell his name what by calling people who love ahlul bait the family of prophet muhammed ? hahahah and yet you call your self a muslim shame on you KUFFAR!
rabi9843 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
persian language sounds so gay. To hell withall of you
ss02z471 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dirty shia
ss02z471 3 years ago
hahahahhaah my sunni friend i am not as ignorant as you are so i wont say anything offensive towards you but who was the cousin,first male islamic believer and son in law of the prophet mohammed (pbuh) Imam Ali, so i hope that gives you can understand why we are shia, oww and did abu bakr's son become a martyr for the sake of islam? or did Imam Ali's and didnt the prophet mohammed (pbuh) say Hussein is of me and I am of Hussein? well hope you enjoy hell salam.
rabi9843 2 years ago 3
abu bakers son was not any random person he was one of imam al's (a.s) closest friends and he died for justice and ali in a way wer wen they killed him the stufed him into a donkeys stomach and burned him and the donkey...u dnt see these things so u dnt believe......we love his son cos he died for justice and truth...and didnt the prophet s.a.w. say al hak m3 ali wa ali m3 al hak...meaning the truth is always wid ali and ali is always with truth
mo31293 2 years ago 2
This song is great!
Bingo996 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THIS IS SHIRK AND KUFR!!!!!
kill0rgie 3 years ago
how?
yaabolfazl 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
تو معلومه وقتی محمد دزد به ایران حمله کرد سپاهش جملگی همه مادر جندتو از کس وکون گایدندو توخواهر کسه رااز کون پس انداخته.کس خواهر تو و پیامبر و12 امام دزد بیناموس. ما ایران را اسلام کثیف ازاد میکنیم.
fermisk 3 years ago
simply enough disgraceful language will not be tolerated!
samk786110 3 years ago
you know you can remove such comments. Or disable comments all together!
shamsi2c 3 years ago
@fermisk 'What is wrong with the language? The only thing un tolerable there is the clapping of the hands, that is not what any Muslim, let Shias do in prayers, esp. in mosques, but, the Iranians introduce this every where and we do not like them to introduce in our places of worship.
sanaabegum 1 year ago
@sanaabegum This is the difference between Sunnite Islam & Shi'ite Islam. In Shi'ite Islam there is this sense of continual love & mourning for holy infalliable Ahlol Bayht, peace be upon Them All. Allah (God) has totally cleansed Ahlol Bayht of all sin! They are the perfect pure source from which we can follow the truth. The holy infalliable Prophet of Islam, Mohammad, peace be upon Him & His Family, is also pure, free from any error, just as the Holy Koran is.
PeakofEloquence 11 months ago
i can relate to alot of this song, may allah bless mirdamad and the poster for having shared this:)
PERSIANSHIA 3 years ago 3
Too Iran nemishe sazo navaz zad,,,nemishe raghsid,,,,baraye hamin ham ba dast zadan baraye ali o hosseino amsaale inha khodeshoon ro erza mikonan,,,,,moteassefam baraye mamlekatemoon,,,heif,,,,Khode ma bishtarin dokhtari ke toor mikardaim too mahe Moharram bood,,,,hamin yaroo rishoo e ke dare nohe mikhoone shab paye baste Teryake,,,, begoo Ziad film bazi nakone ,,,,,,,
borodo2 3 years ago
Ya 3ali madad!!
AlJannahproductions 3 years ago 2
Do you have another parts of this day?
muhammedgolali 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nefrin bar har chi Adam paraste,,,,,Khejalat nakeshid shoma ke dast mizanido Ali ro miparastid ye ho bolnd shid ye raghsi ham bokonid dige,,,,,
borodo2 3 years ago
پناه میبرم به خدا از شیطان !! شما که دقیقاً دارید همان کاری را که شیطان در زمان مولی علی میکرد و اصل فلسفه جهاد حضرتش با سیستم معاویه و یزیدبخاطر همان دجالگریها و عوام سازی و عوامفریبی بود میکنید!!این برداشت مدرن و باصطلاح «به روز » از اسلام نیست بلکه ادامه بقای فقر و فقرائ زمان ما و چپاولگران و نوادگان حقیقی معاویه و ابوسفیان است. سیستم های صوتی و تصویری شما و ریتم ها و شاید در آینده رقصهایی هم که مجاز بدانید بازار شکست خورده سرمایه داران و صنایع غرب و غیر مسلمان را رونق میدهد نه دین وغقیده را!
motzo82 3 years ago 2
ya ali madad. i lv mirdamad. long live mirdamad. ali mola
kingmadzy786 3 years ago 2
Ya Ali
iranianproud 3 years ago
ali yarat
ali19818181 3 years ago
YA ALI
haleembademjan 3 years ago
How could one not love ahlubayat! allah yanal al wahabi!!!!
kdoe189 3 years ago 16
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dast mizanan in haram ast haram!!! nabajat dast zad.
laelaheellallah 3 years ago
sine bajad bezanam.
Ali Yaretun
pesar69 3 years ago
sawabesh bishtare
pesar69 3 years ago
thats right.. we shia die for our religon and its rasool.. yet wahabis are here fightig eachother and killing all muslims and say they saving the islam.. alalh swt save his shia and punishthose who kill our shia
hanonah1115 3 years ago 3
قل يا الله يا مشرك ولا تقول يامحمد فما بالك ب علي الاقل منزله ومكانة من محمد صلوات الله وسلامة عليه واله انتم تشركون بالله من حيث لاتعلمون قال صلى الله عليه واله وسلم [إن العبد ليتكلم بالكلمة من سخط الله لا يلقي لها بالا تهوي به سبعين خريفا في نار جهنم]
she3y1 3 years ago
this was a synagogue of satan.
inja kaneeseye juhuda bood?
MohammadX101 3 years ago
lol another fag wahabi in the tube.. mash allah and may alalh swt find deepest part of hell for u garbage noones.. arent u late to blow ur slef up
hanonah1115 3 years ago
BEAUTIFUL!!
talatmirm 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Are you sick?
You are Tazi parast!!!
Are you Iranian?
Shame on you.
Payandeh Iran
bahmanjazuyeh 3 years ago
Ghorbone Haidar besham. khoneie marde mardan dele ma hast
korosh1kabir 3 years ago
ya ali madad
ArianSky 3 years ago
goooooooooooood
mahditherasta 3 years ago
Hey there, would it be possible to talk about something other than religion, or just not mention it at all? Seriously, it's 2008 people, time for you guys to let go of your centuries-old fiction and take a real good hard look at the destruction religious idiots cause! Religion segregates people, and for no reason should religion and politics ever leak into each other, that includes law. MORALITY CAN EXIST WITHOUT FEAR! LONG LIVE REALITY! LONG LIVE GENUINELY GOOD PEOPLE!
SatanIsMySlut 3 years ago
u talk about reality, eh? Brother, to you, seriously its 2008!! time for you to do the reality check before its too late, no offense or anything, but as long as Satan will be your s**t, you'll be away from the REAL REALITY!
Sajj007 3 years ago
My user name was a joke. Satan doesn't exist. Silly child.
Yeah, that's what I said! You have the mind set of a child!
Hell is a fabrication. And you are stupid to believe it exists. Do you believe in unicorns and leprechauns? What about if everyone else around you thought they were real?
Answer honestly and you will see the truth. You are a sheep. You have no thought of your own, you just adopt the thought patterns of the people around you.
SatanIsMySlut 3 years ago
(continuation of below) This reply starts 4 pages behind this one: i.e. if this is page 1 that you are currently on, then this reply starts on page 4.
P.S
I'm sorry for any inconveniences caused by me having to keep fragmenting my argument into little boxes; but the space which youtube provides for us to be able to post a message really is too short for this kind of situation.
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
Bismillahi Irrahman Irrahiim
Thank you for your patience Brother. May allah entablish this character for life.
Salam.
iamsnail 3 years ago
wa'alaykomus'Salam wa rahmotAllah (S.W.T)
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
Salam to all those who read this message; below you will see another message whch i have just posted with the beginning having written: (part 32). This (part 32), which is below, is the continuation of a reply to a friend called 'wisdomuser'; in which i put forth an extremely logical argument, through the use of logical questions - through which i hope to have opened "wisdomuser's" eyes to the truth.
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 32)I pray to Allah (S.W.T), that insha Allah (S.W.T: the simple questions of simple logic which are based on your own religious books; will have insha Allah guided you to the truth and opened your eyes to it.
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 31) correct one, by being appointed by the 1st; then why is it that the 1st and 3rd khalifas could not be appointed as the Khalifa of the Muslims in the same way? Similarly, if the method of appointing the third khalifa was the correct one, then why was it that this same method was not used for the first two khalifas.
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 30) an election in which: the public had no role, there were only 6 candidates, and the khalifa was to be chosen by the 6 candidates alone. Hence, the question is simply: "If the method of appointing the first khalifa was the correct one - by 'apparently' giving the freedom to elect the khalifa to the people, then why was it then that the second and third khalifas could not be elected as the khalifa of the Muslims in the same way? If the method of appointing the second khalifa was the
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 29) preventing them from choosing their next khalifa by themselves. Lets now go one step further and pretend that although the first to methods of appointing the first two khalifas completely oppose one another; they were still acceptable and 'correct' methods of appointing the first two khalifas of the final religion of Allah (S.W.T) revealed to mankind. If this is the case, then: if the first two methods were correct, then why was it that the 3rd Khalifa was brought to power by winning
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 28) Rasoolollah (S.A.W) left no successor to his 25 year complete struggle, but rather the first khalifa was to be appointed through the 'correct' method of an 'free election', but then Omar (the 2nd khalifa) comes to power by being appointed as the successor of Abu Bakr - and so already completely opposing the first method of choosing the leader of the Muslims: the first method 'apparently' gave the freedom to elect to the people, the second method took the freedom from the people --
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 28) Rasoolollah (S.A.W) left no successor to his 25 year complete struggle, but rather the first khalifa was to be appointed through the 'correct' method of an 'free election', but then Omar (the 2nd khalifa) comes to power by being appointed as the successor of Abu Bakr - and so already completely opposing the first method of choosing the leader of the Muslims: the first method 'apparently' gave the freedom to elect to the people, the second method took the freedom from the people --
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 27) question; which is as follows: "If the way in which Abu Bakr became khalifa was the 'correct' method, and it was a 'truly' free election left to the people; then why is it that for the appointment of Omar Ibne AlKhataab as the second khalifa; the same method was not used - but rather not only were the people not allowed to elect their khalifa; they were enforced to accept Ibne Al Khataab as the successor of the first khalifa. Hence, already up to this we see that: 'apparently'
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 26) questions proved to the logical mind that Rasoolollah had appointed Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) as his successor; this final question clearly proves to the simplest of minds how the whole way in which the first 3 Khalifas came to power was wrong in itself. My question is a simple question based not on evidence, or on any sort of necessary intelligence, but rather it is a question based simply on logic - and so i will not go on to explain it, but rather i will simply leave it at the
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 25) that we can even put this of the so many points proving the successorship of Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) aside. While we are at that i will even pretend for the sake of your beliefs that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) did not appoint a successor to continue his lifelong efforts and simply left it to a 'simple' election. Dear wisdomuser, my last question does not even require these clear evidences; because of the fact that although all my other
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 24) interpretation in order to fragment the Muslims amongst themselves, and to ruin their unity. Although, one would believe that up to this stage even the least of 'wisdomusers' would have been completely enlightened and opened their eyes to the truth, i will still proceed to make my fourth and final question. Dear wisdomuser, although the magnificent event of Ghadeer is an undisputable one in the history of humanity as well as the history of Islam, for this last question i will pretend
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 23) than his successor in this magnificent event - and so himself also following the command given to him by the All-Mercifull Allah. And so, dear wisdomuser, if you are truly are what you claim to be - a 'wisdomuser', then i am certain that you will agree with me that the people who suggested their own interpretations of the words of Rasoolollah (S.A.W)on the day magnificent day of Ghadeer, were suggesting these interpretations out of pure ignorance, or that they were suggesting this
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 22) is: Oh Muhammed, if you do not appoint a successor to continue the teachings of your religion, then it is as if you have not preached the message of Allah at all), and the fact that his death was nearing; would be the only logical interpretation, which is: The Holy Prophet of Islam had used the word 'mawla' in his beautiful statement on the magnificent day of Ghadeer; with the most suitable intended meaning of 'master', as Rasoolollah (S.A.W) was most obviously appointing no one other
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 21) would comprehend from all of this; that The Holy Prophet of Islam, Muhammed (S.A.W) would not ask such a thing of all the people present, and would not emphasize the importance of the words he was speaking on that day in the way he did; unless the words that he was speaking were of extreme significance. Hence, judging on the Islamic situation of Rasoolollah; in terms of the latest Ayat of the Quran which had been revealed to him before this event (the English interpretation of which
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 20) he (S.A.W) was the cousin, then Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) was also his cousin. I mean honestly, would it even make sense to the mind of a mere 8 year old - that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) who had such a great care for all the people, and for all creations of Allah (S.W.T) alike; would command them as their Prophet: to wait and listen to him tell them that whomsoever he (S.A.W) was the cousin of, then Ali Ibne Abi Talib was also his cousin. Hence, one with at least the least logic of minds
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 19) like you all to think that: how could such a man who had such conduct with all people, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, who would worry so much that the poor and needy and all those in distress were being cared for ---- how such a man could command 115000 - 125000 people (according to your own religious books); amongst whom there were also were very old people, to endure the scorching heat of the Arabian sun in the Hajj period of the Islamic calendar; just to tell them that whomsoever
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 18) absolutely shocked as to why on earth Rasoolollah (S.A.W) was being so very nice to her, when she had tormented him every single day he had came to visit the mosque. So the old lady asked Rasoolollah (S.A.W) what the religion was which he preached, and she found that it was Islam. Hence, because or Rasoolollah's (S.A.W) display of the true Islamic character; the old lady converted to Islam. Now that we have at least a slight insight into the character of Rasooloollah (S.A.W)I would
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 17) of Islam, Muhammed (S.A.W), had come to punish her for all the times that she had showered him with rubbish on his way to the mosque, and for all the rouble that she had caused him. However, to her surprise Rasoolollah (S.A.W) inquired as to how she was feeling, and whether she required anything (any medicine or shopping) that he would get for her, and continued to treat the old lady with the best of human conduct (which is the Islamic conduct). On seeing this the old lady was
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 16) and had chosen not to leave her house. At hearing this; Rasoolollah was severely emotionally hurt, and straight away got the address of this old lady to go and visit her (Because of the fact that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) personally practised every single thing he preached, and he preached that a Muslims should visit the ill). Once arriving at her house, the old lady discovered that it was Rasoolollah (S.A.W) at her doorstep at felt extremely frightened; as she thought that The Holy Prophet
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 15) One day when Rasoolollah (S.A.W) visited the Mosque, he noticed that the old lady who would throw rubbish at him every time he would visit the Mosque was not there. Hence, Rasoolollah (S.A.W) set about asking the people why the old lady had not been there, and whether anything had happened to her. As a result of asking many people, Rasoolollah discovered that the reason the old lady had not been there to throw rubbish at him that day; was because of the fact
that she was ill that day,
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 14)tell you a story to you about the noble character of Holy Prophet Muhammed, so that you and the others who read this may know him for his 'true character' at least to the slightest of extents: There was a certain Mosque in the state of Islam which Rasoolollah (S.A.W) would visit everyday. Whenever Rasoolollah (S.A.W) would visit this Mosque, there was always an old lady (who was not Muslims) who would always wait for him in the path of the Mosque, and throw rubbish at Rasoolollah
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 13)because of the very fact that they make their own assertions and interpretations of Rasoolollah's (S.A.W) words and claim to be Muslims when they do not even know the beautiful and noble character of Rasoolollah (S.A.W). Anyone, who even has the slightest idea of the character of Rasoolollah Muhammed (S.A.W); know that he was not a man who would ever be the cause fo any trouble for others, who would always practise kindness towards others, and would always try to help others. I wish to
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 12) stating that what Rasoolollah (S.A.W) by those beautiful words was that whomsoever he was the cousin of, then Ali was also his cousin. However, the reason that i say that this argument put forth by some Muslims amongst us is absolutely ignorant; is because of the fact that the actual people who suggested this whole interpretation and caused this whole dilemma, were not actually even Muslims themselves, but, rather they were hypocrites (munafiqs). I say that these people were hypocrites
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 11)also his cousin. Before one goes onto reply to this childish statement, one must first understand the meaning of the word "mawla" in the Arabic language, and one must also truly know the character, and conduct with the people, of Rasoolollah(S.A.W). In the Arabic language the word "mawla" has 29 meanings which can be derived from it; a few of which are 'cousin', 'master', 'slave'. Hence, by simply basing the argument on this little information alone, one would not be wrong at all in
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 10)following: "Oh people whomsoever I am his "MAWLA", then Ali Ibne Abi Talib (A.S) is also his leader.....". Now, the point which has been used by some of the enemies of Islam to prevent some of us from opening up our eyes and seeing the truth about the event of Ghadeer, is the following: when Rasoolollah (S.A.W) said that "Oh people whomsoever I am his MAWLA, then Ali Ibne Abi Talib is also his MAWLA"; what Rasoolollah meant was that: whomsoever Rasoolollah is the cousin of, then Ali is
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 9)to go forwards and call all the men back, and then he instructed all the Muslims left to wait where they were until all those who were still coming back from the Ka'aba had arrived, and all those that had gone ahead had returned. Once everyone was present, and in your most valuable religious books, it has been narrated that the number of Muslims who had been gathered at this gathering was around 115000 - 125000 people. And of course as you should know, Rasoolollah went on to say the
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 8)which is this: "what happened to the successorship of Ali (A.S) at Ghadeer e khum?"
You have the event of Ghadeer mentioned in every single one of your religious books, yet look how simply you neglect it, and so neglect the truth. My friend at Ghadeer e khum, during the return of Hajj, Rasoolollah S.A.W) made a great pile of sandals using all the sandals of the people present, and then he went up this 'mountain' of sandals and instructed a group of Muslims from the gathering present
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 7)clearly that we are not even legible to make a decision over the most pettiest of things without Allah (S.W.T) without Allah (S.W.T) guiding us, yet the successor to the greatest as well as the final religion sent to man by God (S.W.T) should simply be left down to an election.
Well, in all due respect, i don't know what you are thinking, but to the most basic of logical minds i am sure that that would sound absolutely ridiculous.
Now, dear wisdomuser i move onto pose my third question
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 6)the successor to the seal of the prophets should be. Than why is it that in such an extremely important religion; it should not be Allah (S.W.T), the creator of man and this religion, who should choose who the successor of Rasoolollah (S.W.T) should be, it should not be Rasoolollah (S.W.T) who should decide who his successor to the religion he sacrificed his life in order to establish should be, but rather it should simply be left down to the people in order to choose - when we know
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 5)of Islam ('the' final revelation to mankind by Allah (S.W.T) is outsmarted by his simple successor: who had at least appointed himself a successor.
That is just my first point. My second question oh wisdomuser is that: "If Islam is the true last religion sent to mankind by God, and we as Muslims believe that man does not have the sufficient knowledge to decide on small petty things by himself without the help of his Lord - let alone to make decisions on such massive things such as who
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 4)anything in his reign which took much from his life, yet, Rasoolollah (S.A.W) who put so much more than even his blood, sweat, teeth, and tears into the establishment of the religion of Islam itself - let alone its state; did not even think about appointing himself a successor.
My brother in humanity, verily the answer to this Question, which is the logical question one reaches after studying your beliefs, is NO, for verily this cannot be the case; where the appointer of the Religion
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 3)could it really be that; AbuBakr who faced no problems in just 3 years of his reign, and had made no establishments whatsoever ((all the establishments that had been made for Islam, had already been made in Rasoolollah's (S.A.W) time; which Abu Bakr just continued - of course the difficulty of which Rasoolollah (S.A.W)had to suffer)) was intelligent enough to establish himself a successor; considering the fact that he did not even need to worry about doing so as he had not really done
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 1)Dear Wisdomuser, may Allah (S.W.T) guide you to the right path insha Allah. Please just take a moment to think about it: according to your beliefs; then Abu Bakr is even greater than Rasoolollah (S.A.W) (honestly think about it please), because how is that Rasoolollah (S.W.T) spent 25 years of his life, endured the greatest of all pains in these 25 years (we all believe that Rasoolollah (S.A.W) endured the greatest pain from amongst all the prophets; only for the sake of Allah (S.W.T)and
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
(part 2)establishment of Islam. And so my question is this dear wisdomuser: "How is it that it reach Rasoolollah (S.A.W) intelligence to leave behind a successor who will guide Islam after him, and to protect all the establishments he had achieved after 25 years, yet, Abu Bakr was intelligent enough to place a successor to protect the establishments he had made in his simple 3 year reign (in which the Islamic state had barely any problems whatsoever for him to face). I mean just think about it:
sagedarekhuneyehosse 3 years ago
Just shut up , you are not Iranians, do not speak persian, you do not deserve it,go back to your arabia or wherever.Filthy muslims.You have distroyed Iran, get the xxx out of Iran.
persiangulf1 4 years ago
If you say so you every people had their own religion before islam. Turks had schamanism, persians had zoroastrianism, arab had an other to, decis had another different too. but theese people have understood the right meaning of life. it have nothing to do with arabism my friend its to be human and this practice is a role in it. god bless shia iranians!
TurkishShia 4 years ago
The philosophy of Islam is anti-iranian,if you do not know that ,read the soore" Al_room".Please wake up and know one thing: No iranian is a muslim and no muslim is an iranian.Every soore in Quran is a product of Mohammad himself and Salman (his mentor), and not the true Gud.Gud is not stupid to name Mohammad and Salman his/her messenger.Please read Quran fully before you accept it.The problem with all muslim people is that they first accept then read Quran, this is wrong my friend.
persiangulf1 4 years ago
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
wisdomuser 4 years ago
who's got the xxx to iran? saudi Arabia which is providing Quran with all the languages translations, or the Imam khumaini who, allowed what Allah has forbiden?.
\peace and guidance! to all, Ameen.
wisdomuser 4 years ago
i love zhis video...really really ya aliiii ya aliiiiii
acar1shia 4 years ago
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
wisdomuser 4 years ago
sa mumineen why do ppl care how we do things. let us clean our hearts an d minds and pray to allah swt for forgiveness and pray that our judgment sends us to jenna insha allah... lailaha and long live the message of our beloved ahlyl beit
hanonah1115 4 years ago
@
zodiacthug1980
.................
honestly bro,u need to search more abt the phrase "Ali".
ajzden 4 years ago
type in youtube search فضيحة قناة المنار الشيعية الرافضية المجوسية ومصحف فاطمة
zodiacthug1980 4 years ago
i searched but what does he says in that video?
19891368 4 years ago
what the hell is wrong with those ppl ali dead 1400 years ago..islam still alive ((and for who ever say ya ali madad)) ali is dead he ((CANT)) HELP U...if u wana go to heavens follow islam man
zodiacthug1980 4 years ago
LOL why do Iranians clap? I really like this guys voice but why do we clap man?
yomamani 4 years ago
for example if im a christian and if i vant to learn some things about islam and one shia ofer mee to acept islam (convert in islam) with these video records, with these brain trance music?
I will hate somethin like this and i will be afraid of these kind of "muslims"
burisimo 4 years ago
hello, mr. Vanna be a Kristian; and oh yeah Genius, it's want and not Vant. And second of all, If you're gonna be afraid of something as beautiful as this you seriously need to see a psychiatrist, coz bro you're psycho - either you're you've crashed your head against somewhere real hard in the course of your petiful life; which has lead your head to work in reverse - i.e , you see beautiful as ugly, and ugly as beautiful.
sagedarekhuneyehosse 4 years ago
oh thanke you mr sagedarekhuneyehosse but if i want to be a real psycho i will foll these loosers like you and your imams but elhamdulilah i acept islam from sunni brothers poore ISLAM without psycho-trance,mixin male and female like in these psycho-trance party (discustin) eudubiLah.
burisimo 4 years ago
ok, now i now my answer - it was option number 2 then; you were simply born a psycho, it was in ur genes wat can u say ryt.
Orevoir
sagedarekhuneyehosse 4 years ago
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
wisdomuser 4 years ago
(continuation of previous reply)
Or, you were simply born like this, and if that's the case it's not your fault to such an extent, what can either of us say man, it's just simply in your genes.
Anyways, Sayed Ali.K, wonderful video you've enclosed here- and i apologise on behalf of this 'Vanna be Kristian' and the likes of him, for being allowed to have the privillege of watching these 'vonderful wideows'..
sagedarekhuneyehosse 4 years ago
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
wisdomuser 4 years ago
hahahhaahaha!! are you for real man????
Where goes your "straight path"?
Tell me one thing:
Cant the son of your enemy kill your son just because of the differences between you and your enemy even when your son is not responsible for anything and is just killed, because your enemy wanted his son to kill your son?
Think! If you dont get in the first place, Think again....and again....yet again... before you put up any stupid or irrational remarks!
Sajj007 3 years ago
beautiful what is the name of the reciter?
Ali1573 4 years ago
hü allah hü ali
oxsor 4 years ago
allah muhamed ali
oxsor 4 years ago
ربنا لا تحاسبنا بما فعل السفهاء منا
شفوا الكليبات الي عندي
faisalw 4 years ago
MEDAD YA ALI!!!
Qartanesi66 4 years ago
Great .. Ya Ali Madad
Croncil 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
روافض ..
لو يسمخ الخنزير مسخا ثانيا ما كان الا دون قبح الرافضي .. اجل ايران .. اقطع ام الخزعبلات يا روافض .!
sda72000 4 years ago
masallah
YA MUHAMMED YA ALI HAYDAR YA EHLI-BEYT
kkoolboy 4 years ago
Allahu Akbar ! Great song !
MehdiSoldier 4 years ago 2
what a buncha of brainwashed idiots...NO WHERE in the koran does it say to spend your entire life mourning.
this is just a tool by the mullahs to keep iranians brainwashed and suck out any
69ali 4 years ago
It nice but I don't get wat they're saying :(
lebanon2838 4 years ago
love this
outlandavara 4 years ago
bro, can you tell me, from which city this man is?
Rivaldobarcelona2001 4 years ago
salam...
sayed mahdi mirdamad is from the holy city of Qum, and recites there most of the time
samk786110 4 years ago
ok brother, thanks for that :-)
Rivaldobarcelona2001 4 years ago
hey ~ felows
This is really just wasting your time to see or attend to such a silly mourning or ceremony~
alexghah 4 years ago
hey alexghah,
What makes u think this is wasting time?
Do u not ever mourn/celebrate the death/birth day of ur close relatives?
mmnajar 4 years ago
ask yourself who was dead first? Ali or abu bakr? who was dead first? Ali or Omar ibnu alkhattab? so how can they kill ahlu albayt while they are dead befor their father is dead? i tell you what, a counsen take it in your heart and ask Allah to show you the truth and right straight path cuz even muhammad pbuh himself can't do anything for you, who killed Omar ibnu'Alkhattab? abu lu3lu3a, that one and his friends are the killers of ahlu albayt. peace and guidance to all. Ameen.
wisdomuser 4 years ago
The best way to prevent this social and political cancer cell (Islam) from spreading in our Iranin society is to educate your kids, family and your society;
Iranian society is dying because of this social cancer,
This be-sharaf Mirdamad is playing with your kid's lovely emotion.
Begoo Ya Irani be-kan Reesheh Ein Beesharafaro..
Zendeh-Bad Iran
Alborz33 4 years ago
Allahu Akbar
I love this ; Ali, Ali, Ali, Ya Ali, Labbayka Ya Ali
MehdiSoldier 4 years ago
ALI ALI,ghalam khast noghtie zafe ali ra benevisad ,ghafel az on bod ke ALI noghteh nadrad
ebi612001 4 years ago
Is this for real?
arash121 4 years ago
ya ali taj ras il iraniin
mafia5555 4 years ago
bah bah very beautifulll yaaaaa alllllllli
Perser85 4 years ago
ali ali ali ali ali ali ali ali ali
yaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaallllllllllllllllliiiiiiii!!!!
alllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiii!!!
amirfigo 4 years ago
I love this video :)
mashaAllah
abaturab 4 years ago
very nice, maashaallah
Rivaldobarcelona2001 4 years ago
ya ali madad? it should be more like ya allah madad to all this people check out the hindus way of pray u would be surprise how similiar this video is with thier festival it is called (BHAJAN)muslims soppose to be diffrent than any other religion.but people have changed for thier own satisfaction n will,may allah bless everyone right or wrong
yaseenwade 4 years ago
YA ALH-UL-BAIT MADAD!!!
SHIA4LIF3 4 years ago
You are so ignorant and stupid. They are not singing for money. If they really wanted money and they can sing, it would make more sense for them to become pop singers and make lots more money.
You are such a fool, I feel so sorry for you, because this ignorance that you have will only lead you to despair on the day of judgment
majnoonalhussain 4 years ago
i like this singer but if in Arabic i like to lessening for this but only i understand Ali bass :)
aliimame 4 years ago
ya Allah ya mohammed ya ali.
zeynel58 4 years ago
excellent clip. thankyou
marmalak 5 years ago
ALI ALI SAHIM ALI
Karabela665 5 years ago
say ya ALI in ne dificulty nd u ll be helped. ya moula we love u
imran1900 5 years ago
yaaa ALI
imran1900 5 years ago
Bah Bah zende bashad harki ino gozasteh inja Ya abalfazl
essyjoon 5 years ago
ya allah madad
ya mohammed madad
ya ali madad
ya imam e zamana madad
SmoothCrim786 5 years ago
Lovely MashaAllaah <3
Muslimah1987 5 years ago
Ya Mowla Ali Shere Khoda !!!
omiiid 5 years ago