jME JavaOne 2007 Video Reel

[reloadfmradio]

that gets better towards the end. Just SENT FOR SCRUFIZZER, GRimINAL and some heads ul be aware of. hit me up gee

[Mordaan]

where can I download the music? btw Java can be programmed to play fast. you do have to manage memory yourself and schedule the garbage collector

[leometaleo86]

Java is slower than C, but phyton too, and C# however java is better... C++ games has a long history. java is startin'.

[DeltaX999]

Java is for sure gaining on c++ for every year, but it has still some way to go before it catch up c++. From what I have heard Java is about 70- 80 % as fast as c++, atleast on newer cpu:s.

[ArthurPartapollo]

JAVA is slower than C++ - due to memory usage and JAVA compilation into binary code. "As fast or faster than C++" - Retarded statement!

[8Maik]

java compilation into ByteCode is done once, when u have compiled your program. java doesn't do that everytime you want to run the program.

[ArthurPartapollo]

"JAVA speed is as fast or faster than C++" - retarded statement. JAVA is slower and will allways be, since it has to interpret the coding language into different binary code, depending on host machine, and furthermore, JAVA has to take care of the memoryusage - a simple solution for the programer - a slower end solution...

[zVelocity]

ROFL java is not an interpreted language

[CarlosEFML]

PSP games running at 222 Mhz (not in full speed = 333Mhz) are better than these pieces of shit. Try to run jME in a pentium 233, and you'll see how better JAVA is..

auhuAUHuhUHAuhauhUHauhUHAuh

faster than C++... what a joke..

[HitecDevil]

amazing!!hmm my cousin didnt told me that they're studying that kind of stuffs at their college..damn i'm jealous!!

[guiniu1027]

unbeleveable

[systat]

Wow, Java rocks, it is really simple language, much more easier than C++, speed is same or even faster than C++(people think that Java is slow because Java in 1995 was slow).

Anyway, in what engine was all this game made??

[stuffradio]

JMonkey Engine

[maisteri]

Java is not faster than C++ and never will be, because Java is an interpreted language.

[systat]

Java is not interpreted language.

[blackmuzzle]

Never heard of JIT before, have you?

[ReturnOfTheZombie]

@maisteri Actually that has been proven wrong already. It largely depends on the programmer. The JIT can eliminate whole branches of native code at runtime if it finds that the execution of that code doesn't have any impact. There are code samples of java that are optimized by the compiler to run in 0ms where as the C++ code will take significant amount of time. Besides, 97% optimization is usually optimized enough. Speed is not the only thing to consider in software :-)

[ReturnOfTheZombie]

@ReturnOfTheZombie Correction. When I say "optimized by the compiler", I wanted to write "optimized by the JIT".

[maisteri]

@ReturnOfTheZombie I wrote that message a long time ago. I now know better. But, I do have to disagree with one small detail. If there is code to execute, it can't run in 0ms. Although things happen fast in the processor, they are not instantaneous (which 0ms implies).

[cserepj]

Somebody please tell us who's responsible for the music? :)

[renanse]

It says at the end of the video. :) see 3:18

[vammpiro]

this song is really cool =)

jmonkey rox!

[samywinter2]

wow look at al theys looks and no comments well 2

[chocolover01]

Bang!Howdy is the best one!

[drikle]

Damn, Go JAVA GO !!!