I will be going to my first sugarland concert in sept, and love this song does anyone know how often they actually perform this song at their concert??? thanks
how in the world could this be better than the original when the original is going to have so much more soul and feeling behind it. you guys really need to think of what a cover song is. they here a song and like it and play it. thats it. a singer songwriter spends months maybe years writing a perfect song and then bands like this think they just bec they are successful in their genre they can just take it and make it better. you can never do better than an original period
@treflipper hey since its a cover of a song you like, stop dissing it. some people like the new twists their favorite bands put on a song they already like. you cant say this band doesnt do it well. of course itll be different but you dont have to diss other people you asshole.
hey funnybunches320 you idiot, it was in response to someone who said that the cover was better. You are a moron. What I said was clearly response to someone else. Someone said that the cover was better. And its not because when Matt wrote it. HE FELT IT. Its his song. he and only he can do it best. Thats what i was saying so stop calling me an asshole and stop telling me what to fucking think.
Not a bad version, better than the original if you ask me. A little twangy though. For a great "livingroom recorded" version, search under Jessy H and take a listen. With some microphone assistance, the version would be the best.
You're so mean. Did it ever occur to you that there are many people that like their version. Just because you have an opinion about it does not mean that it is the absolute truth. Get over yourself.
I LOVE THIS VERSION! this should of been thier song, not matt nathanson's. Hes such a nobody in the mainstream world and Sugarland are definetly somebodys.
ok ill agree they did the song good......but if youve ever been to one of Matt's concerts, you'd have to agree no one can sing this the ways he does.......good cover though nice to see Matt's gettin national recignition like this.......GREAT!!
I do love both versions. As a country fan who loves sugarland its hard to pick one. But it's not fair to really compare the two with out a better quality recording but the harmony towards the end of this version is quite unique. I must see sugarland in concert one day!!
I love Sugarland but this song .....eh....... I like Matt Nathanson's vocals better on it......to each his/her own ...... I think (however) if someone wants to sing a song that you wrote that would be an incredible compliment to the songwriter so congrats to Matt for having his talent recognized by a larger audience.
I love this song! It really hasn't got much airplay, so I was pleasently suprised when one of my favorite country bands covered it. I had to buy their c.d. when I heard this was on there.
I will be going to my first sugarland concert in sept, and love this song does anyone know how often they actually perform this song at their concert??? thanks
ffig72 7 months ago
I LOVE SUGARLAND!!!!
truefriendgurl12 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
take a deep breath
2 think of someone u like
3 press f10 5 times
4 send this to 5 other youtube videos
5 look at your screen
cmtmusic100 1 year ago
I was there and it was GREAT! How could you knock it she ROCKS!!
cowgirl4lyfe999 2 years ago
no offense to anybody. but this is no where near as good as matts version...(the original). it is so much better.
kateparker94 2 years ago
Comment removed
kateparker94 2 years ago
I love both versions. But Sugarland is my favorite band ever so i'm a bit biased, I love it!! They're amazing singers
cowgirl8787 2 years ago 4
how in the world could this be better than the original when the original is going to have so much more soul and feeling behind it. you guys really need to think of what a cover song is. they here a song and like it and play it. thats it. a singer songwriter spends months maybe years writing a perfect song and then bands like this think they just bec they are successful in their genre they can just take it and make it better. you can never do better than an original period
treflipper 2 years ago
@treflipper hey since its a cover of a song you like, stop dissing it. some people like the new twists their favorite bands put on a song they already like. you cant say this band doesnt do it well. of course itll be different but you dont have to diss other people you asshole.
funnybunches320 2 years ago 10
hey funnybunches320 you idiot, it was in response to someone who said that the cover was better. You are a moron. What I said was clearly response to someone else. Someone said that the cover was better. And its not because when Matt wrote it. HE FELT IT. Its his song. he and only he can do it best. Thats what i was saying so stop calling me an asshole and stop telling me what to fucking think.
treflipper 2 years ago
@treflipper One, they aren't even in the same genre, and two, they did it with just as much, if not MORE soul than Matt.
xxbloodxxangelxx 1 year ago
Not a bad version, better than the original if you ask me. A little twangy though. For a great "livingroom recorded" version, search under Jessy H and take a listen. With some microphone assistance, the version would be the best.
woodshot1 2 years ago
a little twangy? sugarland is a pure country band....it should be twangy.
emilyekissinger 2 years ago
seriously, don't do a fuckin cover song if you aren't going to live up to it.
veryneatmonster 2 years ago
You're so mean. Did it ever occur to you that there are many people that like their version. Just because you have an opinion about it does not mean that it is the absolute truth. Get over yourself.
magichounddog 2 years ago
those many people need to have their hearing checked
veryneatmonster 2 years ago
You are a fool!
magichounddog 2 years ago
seriously. this version is better than the original. so don't leave dumbass comments ;D
musicguy225 2 years ago
this version is ridiculously horrible
veryneatmonster 2 years ago 2
they sound better than the original person that sings it
hollister742 2 years ago
i am so with you on that one.
akosayshi 2 years ago
Comment removed
wahinepnai8 2 years ago
this is the only thing country i like. i like nothing country i just think the chorus sounds cool
treflipper 2 years ago
Matt's is so much better.. But of course no body has anything on him.
Caudell32 2 years ago
i luv u Jen!!!!
4 all u ppl tht r wondering sugerland did this song first!!!!!
IaMaTWILIGHTER1 2 years ago
no they didn't
akosayshi 2 years ago
What relationship, if any, does Sugarland have with Matt Nathanson?
I liked the cover, but I was a bit surprised to see a country group cover a Matt Nathanson.
PeoplesWar 2 years ago
hes been opening for them at some of their concerts but basically they just like him so they sang one of his songs lol
viviiscool 2 years ago
Matt Nathanson, opening for Sugarland? Wow, that's quite a mix in genres!
PeoplesWar 2 years ago
yah i know but i like it lol since i think they are both really awesome
viviiscool 2 years ago
i may be wrong, but i was told that sugarland did this song first..?
s0lt3sz 2 years ago
nope matt did it first..I really like this cover though
feelingsmiley 2 years ago
matt brought out the album Some Mad Hope in 2007 which has this song on it :o) :o)
feelingsmiley 2 years ago
i thought they did a very good job. I like this version. its different.
mandaa1120 2 years ago
Obviously you've not seen them sing that song live and up close. They did an awesome job.
imsparkles 2 years ago
if they would have got the words right it would have been alright but "thrill of the silence"? uh... no.
morphinexkiss 2 years ago
they did pretty good but their voices (at least hers) are too country-sounding for this song. i like matt's version much better
mlblovesyou4 2 years ago
they totally ruined this
csl82796 2 years ago
Agreed
RyoruIshnamea 2 years ago
wow that was so bad!!!
manderz925 2 years ago
lame. they ruined it.
andyjl810 2 years ago
I LOVE THIS VERSION! this should of been thier song, not matt nathanson's. Hes such a nobody in the mainstream world and Sugarland are definetly somebodys.
WELL DONE JENNIFER!
invisible2017 3 years ago
to have kristian sing the chorus on his own is pretty cool
blugreen123 3 years ago
Absolutely to agree with you lolomgjae, nobody does it like Matt.
angeliocp 3 years ago
this is a good cover, but nobody does it like matt. matt`s version is simply awesome.
lolomgjae 3 years ago
ok ill agree they did the song good......but if youve ever been to one of Matt's concerts, you'd have to agree no one can sing this the ways he does.......good cover though nice to see Matt's gettin national recignition like this.......GREAT!!
BrOvens 3 years ago
I actually like Sugarland's version better...It seems like it comes more from the heart and the harmony is awesome!
likeicareloser 3 years ago
I do love both versions. As a country fan who loves sugarland its hard to pick one. But it's not fair to really compare the two with out a better quality recording but the harmony towards the end of this version is quite unique. I must see sugarland in concert one day!!
lilsouthernchemist 3 years ago
I love Sugarland but this song .....eh....... I like Matt Nathanson's vocals better on it......to each his/her own ...... I think (however) if someone wants to sing a song that you wrote that would be an incredible compliment to the songwriter so congrats to Matt for having his talent recognized by a larger audience.
jb71577 3 years ago 2
It seems more poignant to have a woman sing it.
Both versions are great though!
Octoberrd64 3 years ago
exactly, sounds a bit wimpy by a dude but simply an opinion. like when Trace Adkins covered "Break Down Here" by julia roberts
ssutto4 3 years ago
I'm going to go against the flow... I love Sugarland's version more than Matt Nathanson's.
Also, love Jennifer Nettles on guitar :D
18hockey20 3 years ago
Matt Nathanson Rocks!!
safruca 3 years ago
Matt Nathanson Rocks!!
safruca 3 years ago
I love this song! It really hasn't got much airplay, so I was pleasently suprised when one of my favorite country bands covered it. I had to buy their c.d. when I heard this was on there.
goofgal 3 years ago
being a huge Matt fan, its a compliment to his musical talents that a bad of Sugarland caliber would do a cover of his song. Its great. I love it
Brianga26 3 years ago
umm...yeah, no matt nathanson that's for sure..
kmslat 3 years ago
i love evry single one of sugarland's song be4cause they r the best band in the world
jnettlesfan33 3 years ago 2
Love this!!
ashpashsoccer6 3 years ago
Wow I love this :)
mckenzie361 3 years ago 2
I love this song
jnettlesfan33 3 years ago
Yeah... this isn't bad, but Matt's is about a zillion times better. But if it gets him more coverage, I won't complain. :o)
psychobetho 3 years ago 2
I'm not a country fan, but this is pretty good. I still prefer Matt though.
danimarie82 3 years ago 2
not too bad for a country act. the yodeling during the "hold ons" are unbearable
kiuuu 3 years ago
im with schrabob... matty all the way :)
but not a bad attempt... it was good until the harmonica/sing along came in... from there it went downhill...
PandemicProductions 3 years ago
down hill ain't very far with SL though... its just another version of the song... i love it :))
irealLYloveSL 3 years ago
Sorry, but I'll stick with the ORIGINAL by Matt Nathanson.
schrabob 3 years ago
yeah, u do that!!!
SAFARISAM1986 3 years ago
Best concert ever! Can't wait for their new CD : )
junebu3992 3 years ago
Ahhhh, I was so there like standing up against the fence like right under them :D They do this song so well :D
sugarready 3 years ago
Thank you for getting a video of this! I love it.
Nikix16 3 years ago