This video merely shows that scientific skepticism and the peer review process WORK, exactly as they're supposed to.
Notice how not all of the evidence, not most of the evidence, but merely a drop in the bucket, has been discredited after all this time? Notice that the alignment of taxonomy, genetics, fossils, and evolution have remained intact after decades of peer review and skepticism? You need a lot more than this to "collapse" the theory of evolution.
"Nearly all experts agree Lucy was a 3 foot tall chimpanzee" That is a god damn lie. A simple cursory look at the current research would tell you that. Lucy was just the first of many fossils found that experts agree what a distinct species of bipedal hominids. So was Neanderthal. DNA evidence even proves that from the many specimens found all over Europe. Perfect example of creatards lying for Jesus.
These two geniuses don't think we come from monkeys, We ARE apes, and we have a common ancestor with todays mokeys.
You mix up two frauds that science debunked with lies about the rest. And you forgot Homo habilis, H. erectus and all the other "steps" on the way. But you probably don't even know why I used citationmarks around "steps". When you know you will know what the theory of evolution really is about and how evolution works.
Evolution means change over time and its pretty obvious that everything doesn't stay the same, it changes. Most people tend to think of Darwin when it comes to this subject and think that he said that we came from monkeys and all of that ridiculous stuff. When he went to the Galapagos Islands he found that there were, on each island, birds, turtles and different animals that adapted to their specific environment on the islands. (I'm not trying to rant or anything I am simply stating fact.)
A lot of negativity on this post. Believe this, believe that! Blah blah blah. There is nothing wrong with having a difference of opinion, until you start forcing your ideas upon one another and calling someone dumb or whatever because they don't agree with what you believe. I believe in God, but if you don't, cool. One thing I know for a FACT though, no speculation, is that nothing bad can come out of reading the bible, as long as you don't try to force your beliefs upon someone else.
I don't have a problem with creationism... However, I think your points might be better received if your spelling were more accurate... I'm just sayin'...
Everyone realizes, of course, that this is just the text from Jack Chick's anti-evolution poster, right? The Lucy statement is new, however. This is pretty silly stuff.
macroevolution is only well supported if you don't research its lies yourself. Microevolution is a completely separate topic. because this kind shows that things can adapt. BUT it NEVER becomes anything different. A stronger bacteria is still a bacteria.
but since you wont let observed science win, and would rather bring God into this go read: I Don't Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist- Frank Turek
it does not use religion, but science to prove God..since that is what you are concerned about
LOOOOL I was predicting one after the other which "example of evolutionary collapse" you're going to put next in the video! All of those mistakes were corrected by SCIENCE! NOT religion! And guess what... science makes mistakes and is NOT afraid to admit them, correct them, learn from them and move on! Now, could you do a little more research and put the other hundreds of examples that actually DO support evolution? I bet you're just going to ignore that last sentence!
you really need to start doing your research and understand why evolution is so well supported. This seems to me to be one of the typical arguments I hear again and again about why "evolution didn't happen". For starters, evolution doesn't say we came from monkeys; it says we came from a common ancestor of apes. Before you try to debunk something you have to know what you're talking about (which clearly you don't). You are just another person trying to debunk a science they don't understand.
Scientists in China have discovered ancient bacteria that cast doubt on Darwin's theory, and have published papers stating this. One of them, Jian Yuan Chan, said, "In China, we can criticize Darwin, but we cannot criticize the government. In the US you can criticize the government, but you cannot criticize Darwin."
@misfit13091 Are you talking about evolution? because evoulution is a fact. A theory in scientific terms is one of the most substantiated words you can put to an explanation on something.
neanderthal man= old man with arthritis.ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. this genius = darwin,and dawkins think we come from monkeys. ha ha ha ha. classic christian, total fool who thinks skydaddy made man from a clump of earth then made a woman by ripping out one of his ribs. ouch that must have hurt. korny, you,re an idiot.
Why is so hard to grasp the theory of evolution when it is so much eaiser to belive that one all powerful being had a week of to create a bunch of stuff...........PLEASE
What about Homo habilis? and the fact that we share 98.5% of our genetic makeup with bonobos. Explain that fucktard. And no shit cro-magnon man is about equal in physique, they're also homosapiens you jizz bucket. They represent our direct ancestors, not a separate species of man. Holy shit the things people come up with so they can continue to stick their dicks in their bibles every night.
scientists discovered many of these hoaxes by using carbon 14 dating or other dating techniques that show that many organisms likes dinosaurs and trilobytes died out millions of years ago. How do you justify using scientific techniques ONLY when they support your beliefs?
Beliefs that you probably would never doubt no matter how strong the evidence against it was...
Haha so true. Creationists will say carbon dating is pure crap when it comes to proving the earth is older than 6000 years, but suddenly becomes acceptable science if it proves a fossil is bogus.
Also, I would like to let you know that you are in a bad position right now. you have copied verbatim from a Jack Chick tract which is copyrighted without anything to show or even suggest that it isn't yours. This is a serious breach of academic statndards and the law. It's called plagiarism and if you pulled this in a class you would instantly get a zero if you were luck, if you weren't you would be failed immediately and possibly thrown out of the school. People take this seriously, it's theft
(my comments on everything after piltdown man seem to have dissapeared... sad)
As for the last bit, go look up human taxonomy. Humans belong to the parvorder: catarrhini which is all old world monkeys. Not only did you come from a monkey but you are a monkey, you are also a great ape, which is why it's funny to hear the term "ape-like human" it's like saying a "bird-like duck" can you come up with a duck that isn't a bird? in the same way there is no human that isn't an ape.
if Lucy was a chimp and all experts agreed on this then why is she classified as Australopithecus afarensis and not Pan troglodytes? Heidelburg man? you mean Homo Heidelburgensis? an extinct species of humans as evidenced by the genus Homo? and you think it being "quite human" disproves evolution? it was human! Ah, nebraska man, this old example of peer review working is endlessly trotted out even though it proves nothing. Piltdown man, the ONLY known forgery and the most you say is that?
Piltdown man was indeed a fake. It was almost certainly planted by the creationist Teilhard de Chardin - who had been allowed to help with the excavations.
Christianity has always been the mother of lies. Well done for keeping up the tradition.
Haha, where'd you get all your sources? Answers in Genesis? Ben Stein? No, no, wait . . . I got it . . . Kent Hovind!!! lol if you didn't disable the ratings to keep people on the outside from seeing how stupid your video is I'd probably give you 5 stars out of pity (See, I can evolve compassion, unlike you).
If evolution were true we would see men, as well as animals, in various stages of evolution,there would always be those who would lag behind,but we don't.Life can't create itself either or we'd see that too especially in a life friendly environment.
Evolution IS true. Men are technically in variation because of evolution. Skin color, eye color, wavy hair, attached and detached earlobes, nose shape, hair color, they are all genetic variations thanks to evolution. Man is still evolving, but it takes a VERY long time to see a dramatic change. The only ones who really notice evolution happening are the scientists who can actually get a closer look and because they're the only ones who take the time to nit pick at that.
It's pathetic that you have to make up idiotic conspiracy theories just so you can pretend evolution is wrong. Maybe if you actually understood how it worked, you wouldn't be calling it brainwashing. You obviously have puffed yourself up too much to even listen to anyone.
Wrong. You assume that because you do not know how it works, nobody does. I know mostly how it works, and all biologists know just about everything on evolution and how it works and why it happens. Quit acting like your opinion and your ideas are automatically fact just because they're what you think, especially when they have no basis whatsoever and are pathetic cloaks you use to defend whatever belief system you have that requires denial of evolution to the fullest extent.
so even with all the evolutionary steps of man proven to be either be fake and hmmm misidentification, wheres the missing link? wait... let me rephrase that.... where is "any link" whatsoever...... there are many kinds of people today with significant variances in bone structure and size, but we are all human. come back when you have more than a "pig's tooth" or "human bones" to link us to apes or monkeys or what the hell ever you want.
Nobodies ever seen one kind of animal turn into another,all that's been observed is variation within a kind of animal and I'm all for that,but no,one kind of animal has ever turned into anything else but what it is.
That's because YOURE NOT FUCKING SUPPOSED TO SEE ONE ANIMAL TURN INTO ANOTHER. That's called transformation and it happens in cartoons and movies, not science. Where did you learn evolution, from watching pokemon or something? Variations adding up eventually make a species become another species very gradually.
Look ,we would see some animals lagging behind others of the same kinds turning into other kinds and we don't,it would be a continuous process,but that's not what we see.The Cambrian explosion shows how everything just appeared without any ancestors.They even came up with punctuated equilibrium to try and make up for evolutions failings.
How is it possible you're so sure of yourself, when you don't even know what you're talking about? The cambrian explosion was a very rapid increase in evolution, not POOF theyre all there. It scares me how your entire mind is set up in this way that just completely sidesteps any consideration of evolution. You're a moron who doesn't know anything about the thing he's avoiding. That's called being closed-minded.
"Nobodies ever seen one kind of animal turn into another"
If you believe in DNA, and you agree that it can be measured/read & typed and put people away in jail.... then you must also agree that evolution happened, there is no alternative... and there are many examples of animals mutating .... take the big cats of Africa as different species, look at the domestic dog and how we've used evolution to create danes / sausage dogs in a matter of a few generations
dbzMaster.... I feel your frustration, isn't it annoying being told by someone that you are brainwashed when you are the one sitting on the evidence and facts and they have no evidence (nor any evidence to even contradict your evidence!)
these people miss an obvious point = why wouold scientists lie !! makes no sense... they would make more fame for themselves for proiving evolution worng
Isn't it amazing what selective breeding does?Men have been breeding animals for as long as they've been around.He's taken advantage of the wide variations in kinds.
You should watch Ray Comfort's video on the the banana. Apparently God made it just so, so that we can enjoy it. It fits perfectly in your hand. It peals very easily. It keeps atheist/evolutionists up at night, apparently. As for the pineapple......
yep ... and I find it amazing how hard it seems for people not to be able to see how quickly we can force the 'evolution' through selective breeding, and not understand how simple it is for the environment to do this naturally... ie. natural selection
Yeah. I'm glad I'm talking to someone who's sane for once on youtube.
I find it funny how they accept all forms of science except anything that contradicts their religion. Strange how convenient it is that almost ALL SCIENCE is perfectly okay but evolution, abiogenesis, and the big bang are not real science, being the only ones that contradict religion. How freaking convenient.
and even evolution isn't totally rejected, only "macroevolution" which is apparently like the word kind, in that no creationist ever dare give it a decent definition lest it be disproven!
what evidence that you have that lucy walked upright? and how is walking upright any kind of proof.... i've seen dogs along with many many other animals walk upright, i suppose dogs are our missing link as well?
Yes,..that's what I'm saying "Outright LIES" that have been misleading people for years, thanks to conman-scientists filing the jawbone of an ape to a human.
Oh my friend, with all these videos, you must be very annoyed then. There is alot here that I personally think takes advantage of people who had more of a, shall we say, restrained access to information. I don't mind ignorance. that's what schools are for, to teach those who want to learn. But intellectual dishonesty should be a criminal offense. Every man has a right to be wrong in his opinions, but no one has a right to be wrong in their facts.
Sorry, that's a common misconception when looking at the data. All it shows is that she was the single one who had both continuing lines of sons and daughters, otherwise the population bottleneck would've introduced so many genetic failures that we'd have been extinct long ago. And BTW, she lived 140 kya as opposed to "Y-Adam" @ 60 kya. More fail and misunderstood science.
No,I can figure out that it would be ridiculous to believe that all children from other women wouldn't exist anymore.How gullible do you think people are?
"How gullible do you think people are?" Let's see: Six-day creation, Original sin, worldwide flood, Red Sea pedestrian, dead 3 days then up and walking? And once on water. And for muslim folks, the gift of iron from the sky? Lifted bodily into the sky? That's just the ones that jump to mind as far as human gullibility. Then we start looking at the politcal scene, and I could just run forever. The only thing inifinite in this universe is human silliness.
LOL,I guess that believing all the matter in the universe coming from nothing is not idiotic?That every living thing came from a rock after water mysteriously appeared on a sterile planet and after billions of lottery wins here we are?That we are related to grass,trees,fish,lizards and monkeys is not a fairy tale?Just think,you believe in magic without a magician and you call creationists gullible he he he!
You know Dan,when D.N.A.was mapped that should have been the end of the argument of origins,favoring a CREATOR.Since DNA is information,to a thinking person,this should prove that information came from outside the source being created.Just like the blue print for a house is not created by the house.DNA ALONG WITH ALL OTHER INFORMATION,when traced back to it's origins,always proves intelligence created it.
And again the attempt to tie the one to the other. Evolution is not about the origin of the universe, nor about abiogenesis, it is simply about the development of the life that already exists from earlier forms to what is seen today. An attempt to try to tie the three is together is simply about religious dogma and the fear generated by the power of these ideas. That the universe, though complex, is understandable. And that, itself, is wonderous.
Just because you want evolution to be true doesn't make it so.You say evolution has nothing to do with big bang,abiogenisis ect.,however when you look at a school book it lumps it all together and teaches all these theories as facts.
I can see why you might not think so about abiogenesis and big bang cosmology, but evolution has been tested indeed and is a verified fact. And as far as DNA being information, sorry, it's just sugars, phosphate, and a purine/pyrimidine base that translates to a codon for a specific amino acid carried to it by the charged tRNA. It's not inforamtion, but it is very complicated biochemistry. And I do understand it very well.
Why do you argue that DNA is not information when everyone knows it is?Just take a paper and pencil and write your name on it.True the paper and pencil are matter but your name is information that came from outside of the two.
Who on earth are you speaking for? Everyone? Biologists, biochemists, and genetic engineers who work with this stuff everyday call it what it is. Complex, but understandable. And still just chemistry. It's further proof of the natural tendency of order to arise from disorder in certain systems. No violation of the 2nd law, just the nature of biochemistry.
You seem to be mistaken here too, I am a deist, but the fact remains that evolution is an ongoing process in humans as well as all other life on this planet today. Ultimatley, the discussion is not about if there is a god or not. That's a matter of faith and should remain so. The question is, as a matter of science, can these things happen without god in a totally naturalistic mechanism. The answer is a resounding yes! Leave faith to faith, and science to science.
I like how you point out science's ability to correct itself and seek out false evidence. I'll bet you it wasn't creationist using their subjective creationist "science" that found it.
nah not 3 but 4 foot. learn a bit if you want to be credible
yeah you re right in 1958... they have make mistake... but in 2008.. they didnt.. lol i love you you are so funny
and no.. Darwin didnt say we came from monkey.. are old are you..10 - 12 ??
You know what is DNA.. if not.. you should , DNA prove all what darwin and einstein was saying about the myth that god exist cause they know that God is only a myth , god is the answer for the weak
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."-Albert Einstein. learn a bit if you want to be credible
albert einstein knows the fact that we were from evolution , like gallilea , copernicus etc...
Gallilea goes in jail because he says we rent from a god. god is for the weak , to bash women , to make money , to scare people etc. i prefer to know then to be a retards
For the same reason Heliocentricity, Gravity, Relativity and even the Atomic theory are all referred to as theories. They are scientific theories which are defined as:- An explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.
So you see the scientific theories are models based on facts. The man-in-the-street def of theory is closer to 'hypothesis'
First of all, I LOVE how he spells evolution on the first slide: "EVOLTUION" priceless.
Also, Dawkins and Darwin think/thought that we came for an ancestor of the chimpanzee, not a monkey. They are completely separate species. It's like confusing carrots and potatoes. :)
Nope, a chimp is a type of primate. Monkeys are primates too along with humans, lemurs, aye-aye, bushbabies, tarsier, marmosets, macaque, mandrills, langur, gibbons, bonobo etc.
Chimps belong to a special category called great apes which include: orangutan, gorilla, chimps, bonobo and us humans. So you could say chimps are apes but you can't say monkeys are chimps or chimps are monkeys.
Oh btw kornissues9, you have more reasons to disagree with evolution? Because the ones you explained in all these videos are just lies that you thought were correct.
If evolution was false explain:
- pseudogenes that dont belong in our genome such as genes for making eggs.
- jumping genes that match the tree of life
- silent mutations that match the tree of life
- over 50 speciation events...
evolution explains these, no other theory/hypothesis does. Evolution is scientific...rest is dogmatic
-Nebraskaman wasn't built out of one tooth. It was an artis who drew the picture out of his imagination with no scientific basis whatsoever.
-Piltdown was later on a real problem for evolutionists because all the other ancestors came from Africa, it was better for creationists if this fossil was not a fake
-neanderthal man, over 500 fossils and only 1 found with arthritis...no Homo neanderthalensis was not human
Care to cite which scientists said that? If you say something, cite it please. Btw, that is like 9 of the hundreds fossils we found. I bet we found fossils going into the thousands.
Do you really think your god wants you to put your dishonest, ill informed drivel on YouTube?? Is he so weak and pathetic that you have to lie for him and done even bother checking your facts?? You just regurgitate, mindlessly, the nonsense published by Chick Publications - your are mocking god
Lucy:"3' chimp"- no scientist claims that,you are telling lies
Heidelberg Man : "quite human" oh really? Does your family have jaws like that?
Nebraska Man : previously discussed-you are misrepresenting
Piltdown Man : as you know,was proven (of course, not by creationists) to be a hoax over 50 years ago
Peking man : yes,the original fossils are missing (did evolutionary biologists stage WW2 to get rid of them?) We have casts of originals & new fossils have been found
Cro Magnon: "whats difference to man" - no scientist claims there is a real difference
Neanderthal : "old man with arthritis - Cave" "This is not to deny that his limbs, as well as his skull, exhibit distinctive features - features which collectively distinguish him from all groups of modern men. In other words, his "total morphological pattern", in the phraseology of Le Gros Clark (1955) differs from that of "sapiens" man." (Straus, Jr. and Cave 1957) - seems you lied about this also
So ....if you want to plagiarise other peoples sloppy work : (i) pick someone better than Chick - he is lazy & dishonest (ii) Do some original research yourself - you have shown to be equally lazy
& dishonest
If you are seriously interest about where life originated , dont expect an answer on YouTube...search Abiogenesis yourself....it is an area of admittedly little research but there is a lot of information readily available-you only have your ignorance to lose
"and no he doesnt need to be protected, why do you even say that, and what am i even lying about eh? and how am i mocking god? im intriuged"
If your God does not need to be protected why are you telling such appalling lies to support him (i.e. denigrate evolution)??? To me, telling lies in Gods name is mocking him, debasing the lessons of the bible....you know : THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS
Look about the neanderhtals,it doesn't prove that they never existed.The significance about the fact that he had artherites was meant to disprove the sterotype that all neanderthals stood with backs bent.
EPIC FAIL. This video shows your utter lack of knowledge on the subject of Evolution. The evidence you've given is infantile. We don't come from monkeys, you idiot. We share a common ancestor..
Now, please explain the identical endogenous retroviral insertion points as well as differing ones after seperation, plus the fact that our chromosome number 2 is a fusion with ancestral chimp chromosome 13 - shown by telomeres in the wrong place and two centromeres of which one has become inactivated
Boy ..is this guy out of date with his misinformation .I thought creationists would have more self respect than to keep trotting out this shit. It's undignified....even for them!
Not a single reputable scientist has ever, ever said that Lucy was a chimpanzee. Homo Heidelburgensis was indeed quite human (genus Homo), but obviously not modern, as the fossils we've found have shown. Nebraska man was a highly speculative error which was corrected by scientists (not creationists). Piltdown man was a hoax perpetrated by British nationalists trying to inflate Britain's anthropologic prestige after the Neanderthal discoveries in Germany, again corrected by scientists.
Dr. Cave never suggested that Neanderthals were modern humans with arthritis, he instead corrected the mistaken belief that Neanderthals had stooped posture based on the mis-articulation of the remains of an individual with advanced arthritis. It is simply laughable to imagine that the suite of traits defining Neanderhtals could possibly be caused by arthritis, or any other disease. Finally, New Guinea and Cro-Magnon man were not our ancestors, they were Homo Sapiens, in a word they were "us".
the charts came from the media's understanding of what evolution teaches..
The reality is even more unbelivable---evolution teaches that life spring from rocks...that life came from non-living matter which disproved by real science years ago...
"the charts came from the media's understanding of what evolution teaches.." So , you think it is bullshit also??? Like "the media's " columns on astrology???
"evolution teaches that life spring from rocks.." This is the sort of dishonest drivel that only an ignorant creationist would say
That is what evolution teaches, otherwise evolution, "change of something over great periods of time" can simply be called, adaption :)
ill ask someone other than brospec because he seems incapable of answering me how we came to be if god dosent exist and evolution somehow does not teach that we evolved from a single cell organism millliionnnnsss of years ago.
That is what evolution teaches, otherwise evolution, "change of something over great periods of time" can simply be called, adaption :) How is adaption not part of evolution??
ill ask someone other than brospec because he seems incapable of answering me how we came to be if god dosent exist and evolution somehow does not teach that we evolved from a single cell organism millliionnnnsss of years ago.
I didnt say that - our common ancestor is a simple single celled organism
That is what evolution teaches, otherwise evolution, "change of something over great periods of time" can simply be called, adaption :)
So what is your excuse for posting all those lies about the "Evolutionary Chart"??? You copied the work of an idiot?? You were too lazy to look it up yourself??
Repeating creationist lies doesn't invalidate reality... We have the fossils, we win.
Who ever used the Piltdown man to prove anything? Who says we have only one (!) Neandertal skeleton? Creationists are not afraid to lie for the greater "good"...
'heidelberg man' huh? okaaay. we have many specimins of homo heidelbergensis, just take a look at my hominids vids for a few. Peking man didn't disappear numbnuts, they were destroyed in during a war, however we made casts prior to it and we have numerous specimins of homo erectus( of which Peking man was from) as well.
'new guinea man'? no such thing. cro-magnon, 'what's the difference', ummm maybe that it's some 30,00 years old?
Sorry to burst your little bubble but A Afrarensis is not remotely related to chimps.
And you should be ashamed for even mentioning Nebraska Man, which was recognized a fake more then a century ago. To even bring this fake artificat to the table really demonstrates just how dishonest some supposed born again Christians are!
This video merely shows that scientific skepticism and the peer review process WORK, exactly as they're supposed to.
Notice how not all of the evidence, not most of the evidence, but merely a drop in the bucket, has been discredited after all this time? Notice that the alignment of taxonomy, genetics, fossils, and evolution have remained intact after decades of peer review and skepticism? You need a lot more than this to "collapse" the theory of evolution.
ChipArgyle 1 month ago
Neanderthal was real lol. But he has the same DNA code as modern man.
Jehstfan 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice channel please check mine out. God bless
Jehstfan 4 months ago
"Nearly all experts agree Lucy was a 3 foot tall chimpanzee" That is a god damn lie. A simple cursory look at the current research would tell you that. Lucy was just the first of many fossils found that experts agree what a distinct species of bipedal hominids. So was Neanderthal. DNA evidence even proves that from the many specimens found all over Europe. Perfect example of creatards lying for Jesus.
foxlake02 4 months ago
You need help.
Timmoux 5 months ago
These two geniuses don't think we come from monkeys, We ARE apes, and we have a common ancestor with todays mokeys.
You mix up two frauds that science debunked with lies about the rest. And you forgot Homo habilis, H. erectus and all the other "steps" on the way. But you probably don't even know why I used citationmarks around "steps". When you know you will know what the theory of evolution really is about and how evolution works.
andvil01 6 months ago
About 120 individuals of Australopithecus afarensis has been found and NO! paeleontologists doesn't think lucy's a chimp.
Heidelberg Man: Except the findings in Heidelberg (Mauer 1) you have Boxgrove, Miguelón, Altamura, Bodo, Ndutu, Saldanha etc.
Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man: Isn't accepted in the scientific community.
Peking Man: yes many fossils dissapered while being shipped to the US for safe keeping but the skull found in 1966 has even been Al/Be dated.
Neanderthal Man: Over 400 found
aakesson1 6 months ago
We didn't just come from monkeys, we ARE monkeys.
AmosTheTalented 6 months ago
i would explain to you why you shouldnt have kids but i doubt you believe in genetics either
ianwatson9 6 months ago
Evolution means change over time and its pretty obvious that everything doesn't stay the same, it changes. Most people tend to think of Darwin when it comes to this subject and think that he said that we came from monkeys and all of that ridiculous stuff. When he went to the Galapagos Islands he found that there were, on each island, birds, turtles and different animals that adapted to their specific environment on the islands. (I'm not trying to rant or anything I am simply stating fact.)
MrSjAsPeRwHiTlOc1000 7 months ago
A lot of negativity on this post. Believe this, believe that! Blah blah blah. There is nothing wrong with having a difference of opinion, until you start forcing your ideas upon one another and calling someone dumb or whatever because they don't agree with what you believe. I believe in God, but if you don't, cool. One thing I know for a FACT though, no speculation, is that nothing bad can come out of reading the bible, as long as you don't try to force your beliefs upon someone else.
gpmartinez22 7 months ago
I don't have a problem with creationism... However, I think your points might be better received if your spelling were more accurate... I'm just sayin'...
MrCokeman468 7 months ago
How do you get through life being this stupid?...I mean job,girlfriend,tying your shoelaces?...how?
pieter292 8 months ago
i have a question, if we did descend from monkeys y is that there still here?
atmospheric00 8 months ago
@atmospheric00 OMG, we didn't descend form monkeys. We descended from a common ancestor. So its as if their our cousins rather than our parents.
mtbers 8 months ago
A truly lame video. I guess that's why you have turned the ratings off.
estragon9 8 months ago
Everyone realizes, of course, that this is just the text from Jack Chick's anti-evolution poster, right? The Lucy statement is new, however. This is pretty silly stuff.
pamcn123 8 months ago
GG cherry picking.
MonochromaticEarth 8 months ago
Look...Another liar for Jesus.
MrFungus420 10 months ago
It's thanks to science works that we know those flase fossils were false
rolingpingu 10 months ago
macroevolution is only well supported if you don't research its lies yourself. Microevolution is a completely separate topic. because this kind shows that things can adapt. BUT it NEVER becomes anything different. A stronger bacteria is still a bacteria.
but since you wont let observed science win, and would rather bring God into this go read: I Don't Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist- Frank Turek
it does not use religion, but science to prove God..since that is what you are concerned about
shmoofoobean44 11 months ago
LOOOOL I was predicting one after the other which "example of evolutionary collapse" you're going to put next in the video! All of those mistakes were corrected by SCIENCE! NOT religion! And guess what... science makes mistakes and is NOT afraid to admit them, correct them, learn from them and move on! Now, could you do a little more research and put the other hundreds of examples that actually DO support evolution? I bet you're just going to ignore that last sentence!
Spetsop 1 year ago
What's this video for, preaching to the converted (i.e. creationists)?
The evidense against evolution presented in the video strikes me as very weak, but am I the video's intended audience?
commonberus1 1 year ago
It is all you have ? Stupid old hoaxes?
galacsinhajto 1 year ago
you really need to start doing your research and understand why evolution is so well supported. This seems to me to be one of the typical arguments I hear again and again about why "evolution didn't happen". For starters, evolution doesn't say we came from monkeys; it says we came from a common ancestor of apes. Before you try to debunk something you have to know what you're talking about (which clearly you don't). You are just another person trying to debunk a science they don't understand.
catsgotmytongue 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Scientists in China have discovered ancient bacteria that cast doubt on Darwin's theory, and have published papers stating this. One of them, Jian Yuan Chan, said, "In China, we can criticize Darwin, but we cannot criticize the government. In the US you can criticize the government, but you cannot criticize Darwin."
AbuIbraheemC 1 year ago
None the less it is still a THEORY so shut the fuck up and come back when u get some solid evidence. Other than a couple fragments of bones
misfit13091 1 year ago
@misfit13091 Are you talking about evolution? because evoulution is a fact. A theory in scientific terms is one of the most substantiated words you can put to an explanation on something.
rookyorange 1 year ago
neanderthal man= old man with arthritis.ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. this genius = darwin,and dawkins think we come from monkeys. ha ha ha ha. classic christian, total fool who thinks skydaddy made man from a clump of earth then made a woman by ripping out one of his ribs. ouch that must have hurt. korny, you,re an idiot.
userwl2850 2 years ago 2
No expert thinks that Lucy was a chimpanzee.
'Peking Man' is, in fact, Homo Erectus. Not all of the skeletons were lost.
Nebraska Man: The scientific community as a whole never accepted Nebraska Man. No scientist ever drew a picture of the man.
Thousands of Neanderthal fossils have been found. Their DNA shows them to be a distinct species from us.
New Guinea Man was made up by creationists.
CroMagnons were indeed human... over 30,000 years ago!
Hundreds of Heidelbergs have been found.
FiverBeyond 2 years ago 3
Peking man is widely consided to merely be a Homo Erectus and it disappered en route from China.
Cro Magnon was a Homo Sapien
As for Neandertahls we have more then one skeleton as well as the other evidence of their existence
Nice fail quote mining from 1958 tho
MangaFanGuy 2 years ago
Why is so hard to grasp the theory of evolution when it is so much eaiser to belive that one all powerful being had a week of to create a bunch of stuff...........PLEASE
rikkus926 2 years ago
What about Homo habilis? and the fact that we share 98.5% of our genetic makeup with bonobos. Explain that fucktard. And no shit cro-magnon man is about equal in physique, they're also homosapiens you jizz bucket. They represent our direct ancestors, not a separate species of man. Holy shit the things people come up with so they can continue to stick their dicks in their bibles every night.
PloppyBo 2 years ago
scientists discovered many of these hoaxes by using carbon 14 dating or other dating techniques that show that many organisms likes dinosaurs and trilobytes died out millions of years ago. How do you justify using scientific techniques ONLY when they support your beliefs?
Beliefs that you probably would never doubt no matter how strong the evidence against it was...
sellbodys 2 years ago
Haha so true. Creationists will say carbon dating is pure crap when it comes to proving the earth is older than 6000 years, but suddenly becomes acceptable science if it proves a fossil is bogus.
PloppyBo 2 years ago
You forgot ARDI, I can't wait for your bull shit about her.
Lucy was a 3 foot high ape, that walked upright. Humans are the only apes that walk upright.
gregrutz 2 years ago
I see you don't care about lying for Jesus. Wow.
k87jury 2 years ago
Also, I would like to let you know that you are in a bad position right now. you have copied verbatim from a Jack Chick tract which is copyrighted without anything to show or even suggest that it isn't yours. This is a serious breach of academic statndards and the law. It's called plagiarism and if you pulled this in a class you would instantly get a zero if you were luck, if you weren't you would be failed immediately and possibly thrown out of the school. People take this seriously, it's theft
satanisthetruegod666 2 years ago
sorry, should say "if you were lucky"
satanisthetruegod666 2 years ago
(my comments on everything after piltdown man seem to have dissapeared... sad)
As for the last bit, go look up human taxonomy. Humans belong to the parvorder: catarrhini which is all old world monkeys. Not only did you come from a monkey but you are a monkey, you are also a great ape, which is why it's funny to hear the term "ape-like human" it's like saying a "bird-like duck" can you come up with a duck that isn't a bird? in the same way there is no human that isn't an ape.
satanisthetruegod666 2 years ago
oh and, when used in science, theory means an idea that is backed up with many distinct observations.
and if evolution is 'just a theory', then what about the theory of gravity or the theory of relativity?
you need to be more educated.
godsballs2 2 years ago
science has mountains of scientific evidence. I would like you to give me any sort of scientific evidence that any form of deity exists.
and you need to learn more about genetics and what role it plays in life.
send me a message if you have your evidence
godsballs2 2 years ago
if Lucy was a chimp and all experts agreed on this then why is she classified as Australopithecus afarensis and not Pan troglodytes? Heidelburg man? you mean Homo Heidelburgensis? an extinct species of humans as evidenced by the genus Homo? and you think it being "quite human" disproves evolution? it was human! Ah, nebraska man, this old example of peer review working is endlessly trotted out even though it proves nothing. Piltdown man, the ONLY known forgery and the most you say is that?
satanisthetruegod666 2 years ago
Piltdown man was indeed a fake. It was almost certainly planted by the creationist Teilhard de Chardin - who had been allowed to help with the excavations.
Christianity has always been the mother of lies. Well done for keeping up the tradition.
Evoltuion?
thallassocracy 2 years ago 3
Haha, where'd you get all your sources? Answers in Genesis? Ben Stein? No, no, wait . . . I got it . . . Kent Hovind!!! lol if you didn't disable the ratings to keep people on the outside from seeing how stupid your video is I'd probably give you 5 stars out of pity (See, I can evolve compassion, unlike you).
beyondbedandbathisme 2 years ago
cool music....almost makes the B.S go down with out a hiccup.
Ron7421 2 years ago
LUCY was a 3 foot chimp.........that walked upright like humans.
gregrutz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Evolution is a theory for idiots who'll believe anything except that someone created them.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
No, creation is a myth for idiots who are too uneducated to understand anything more complicated than "god did it".
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago 2
DAMN RIGHT.
Evolution: Natural selection, genetic drift, millions of years, fossils, radiometric dating, double nested hierarchies. Pure imagination! Garbage!
Creation: Magic man in the sky conjuring up everything with words. THATS WHAT I'M TALKIN' ABOUT!!!
madzyzome 2 years ago 22
thank you for confirming your ignorance Dbz :)
StarSedition 2 years ago
If evolution were true we would see men, as well as animals, in various stages of evolution,there would always be those who would lag behind,but we don't.Life can't create itself either or we'd see that too especially in a life friendly environment.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
Cbal-
Evolution IS true. Men are technically in variation because of evolution. Skin color, eye color, wavy hair, attached and detached earlobes, nose shape, hair color, they are all genetic variations thanks to evolution. Man is still evolving, but it takes a VERY long time to see a dramatic change. The only ones who really notice evolution happening are the scientists who can actually get a closer look and because they're the only ones who take the time to nit pick at that.
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago
You've just been brainwashed to believe this.I'll tell you a secret,it's not true.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
It's not brainwashing. It's education.
It's pathetic that you have to make up idiotic conspiracy theories just so you can pretend evolution is wrong. Maybe if you actually understood how it worked, you wouldn't be calling it brainwashing. You obviously have puffed yourself up too much to even listen to anyone.
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago
Nobody knows how evolution works they just suppose they do.Evolution is nothing but wishful thinking for the lost.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
Cballen-
Wrong. You assume that because you do not know how it works, nobody does. I know mostly how it works, and all biologists know just about everything on evolution and how it works and why it happens. Quit acting like your opinion and your ideas are automatically fact just because they're what you think, especially when they have no basis whatsoever and are pathetic cloaks you use to defend whatever belief system you have that requires denial of evolution to the fullest extent.
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago
so even with all the evolutionary steps of man proven to be either be fake and hmmm misidentification, wheres the missing link? wait... let me rephrase that.... where is "any link" whatsoever...... there are many kinds of people today with significant variances in bone structure and size, but we are all human. come back when you have more than a "pig's tooth" or "human bones" to link us to apes or monkeys or what the hell ever you want.
StarSedition 2 years ago
Star-
Okay. Homo haibilis, homo argaster, homo erectus, austrolipithicus.
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago
Nobodies ever seen one kind of animal turn into another,all that's been observed is variation within a kind of animal and I'm all for that,but no,one kind of animal has ever turned into anything else but what it is.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
*facepalm*
That's because YOURE NOT FUCKING SUPPOSED TO SEE ONE ANIMAL TURN INTO ANOTHER. That's called transformation and it happens in cartoons and movies, not science. Where did you learn evolution, from watching pokemon or something? Variations adding up eventually make a species become another species very gradually.
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago 3
Look ,we would see some animals lagging behind others of the same kinds turning into other kinds and we don't,it would be a continuous process,but that's not what we see.The Cambrian explosion shows how everything just appeared without any ancestors.They even came up with punctuated equilibrium to try and make up for evolutions failings.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
How is it possible you're so sure of yourself, when you don't even know what you're talking about? The cambrian explosion was a very rapid increase in evolution, not POOF theyre all there. It scares me how your entire mind is set up in this way that just completely sidesteps any consideration of evolution. You're a moron who doesn't know anything about the thing he's avoiding. That's called being closed-minded.
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago
"Nobodies ever seen one kind of animal turn into another"
If you believe in DNA, and you agree that it can be measured/read & typed and put people away in jail.... then you must also agree that evolution happened, there is no alternative... and there are many examples of animals mutating .... take the big cats of Africa as different species, look at the domestic dog and how we've used evolution to create danes / sausage dogs in a matter of a few generations
billymatronics 2 years ago
dbzMaster.... I feel your frustration, isn't it annoying being told by someone that you are brainwashed when you are the one sitting on the evidence and facts and they have no evidence (nor any evidence to even contradict your evidence!)
these people miss an obvious point = why wouold scientists lie !! makes no sense... they would make more fame for themselves for proiving evolution worng
billymatronics 2 years ago
Isn't it amazing what selective breeding does?Men have been breeding animals for as long as they've been around.He's taken advantage of the wide variations in kinds.
CBALLEN 2 years ago
You should watch Ray Comfort's video on the the banana. Apparently God made it just so, so that we can enjoy it. It fits perfectly in your hand. It peals very easily. It keeps atheist/evolutionists up at night, apparently. As for the pineapple......
madzyzome 2 years ago
yep ... and I find it amazing how hard it seems for people not to be able to see how quickly we can force the 'evolution' through selective breeding, and not understand how simple it is for the environment to do this naturally... ie. natural selection
billymatronics 2 years ago
Yeah. I'm glad I'm talking to someone who's sane for once on youtube.
I find it funny how they accept all forms of science except anything that contradicts their religion. Strange how convenient it is that almost ALL SCIENCE is perfectly okay but evolution, abiogenesis, and the big bang are not real science, being the only ones that contradict religion. How freaking convenient.
DbzmasterdbzNecross 2 years ago 10
and even evolution isn't totally rejected, only "macroevolution" which is apparently like the word kind, in that no creationist ever dare give it a decent definition lest it be disproven!
satanisthetruegod666 2 years ago
HAHAHA wow this CBALLEN person is fuckin stupid. Go read a book moron and it cant be the bible
LBTennis 2 years ago
what evidence that you have that lucy walked upright? and how is walking upright any kind of proof.... i've seen dogs along with many many other animals walk upright, i suppose dogs are our missing link as well?
StarSedition 2 years ago
Yes,..that's what I'm saying "Outright LIES" that have been misleading people for years, thanks to conman-scientists filing the jawbone of an ape to a human.
USNavyman09 2 years ago
Lucy was a 3 foot chimp[/human]
THAT WALKED UPRIGHT.
That would be what you ask for
A MISSING LINK
gregrutz 2 years ago
What about Australopithecus afarenses? This video is disingenuous to a serious issue.
Sardonac 3 years ago 2
What do you mean? Other than all the outright lies, and numerous half-truths.
magick205 3 years ago 2
It's just that I get annoyed when videos, that profess to be right, are in fact outright lies, numerous half-truths, and repetitions of silly ideas.
:D
Sardonac 3 years ago
Oh my friend, with all these videos, you must be very annoyed then. There is alot here that I personally think takes advantage of people who had more of a, shall we say, restrained access to information. I don't mind ignorance. that's what schools are for, to teach those who want to learn. But intellectual dishonesty should be a criminal offense. Every man has a right to be wrong in his opinions, but no one has a right to be wrong in their facts.
magick205 3 years ago 2
Lucy was a chimp, WHO WALKED UPRIGHT!
The only differents between a man and a chimp is.. Larger brain and walk upright.
That makes Lucy a 'transitional fossil', half way to man.
gregrutz 3 years ago
Richard Dawkins would be quite proud to know you put his picture right next to Charles Darwin's.
Arfalarf 3 years ago
Mitochondrial Eve has been proven to be the great ancestor to all people on Earth,no apes!
CBALLEN 3 years ago
Sorry, that's a common misconception when looking at the data. All it shows is that she was the single one who had both continuing lines of sons and daughters, otherwise the population bottleneck would've introduced so many genetic failures that we'd have been extinct long ago. And BTW, she lived 140 kya as opposed to "Y-Adam" @ 60 kya. More fail and misunderstood science.
magick205 3 years ago
No,I can figure out that it would be ridiculous to believe that all children from other women wouldn't exist anymore.How gullible do you think people are?
CBALLEN 3 years ago
"How gullible do you think people are?" Let's see: Six-day creation, Original sin, worldwide flood, Red Sea pedestrian, dead 3 days then up and walking? And once on water. And for muslim folks, the gift of iron from the sky? Lifted bodily into the sky? That's just the ones that jump to mind as far as human gullibility. Then we start looking at the politcal scene, and I could just run forever. The only thing inifinite in this universe is human silliness.
magick205 3 years ago
LOL,I guess that believing all the matter in the universe coming from nothing is not idiotic?That every living thing came from a rock after water mysteriously appeared on a sterile planet and after billions of lottery wins here we are?That we are related to grass,trees,fish,lizards and monkeys is not a fairy tale?Just think,you believe in magic without a magician and you call creationists gullible he he he!
CBALLEN 3 years ago
You know Dan,when D.N.A.was mapped that should have been the end of the argument of origins,favoring a CREATOR.Since DNA is information,to a thinking person,this should prove that information came from outside the source being created.Just like the blue print for a house is not created by the house.DNA ALONG WITH ALL OTHER INFORMATION,when traced back to it's origins,always proves intelligence created it.
CBALLEN 3 years ago
And again the attempt to tie the one to the other. Evolution is not about the origin of the universe, nor about abiogenesis, it is simply about the development of the life that already exists from earlier forms to what is seen today. An attempt to try to tie the three is together is simply about religious dogma and the fear generated by the power of these ideas. That the universe, though complex, is understandable. And that, itself, is wonderous.
magick205 3 years ago
Just because you want evolution to be true doesn't make it so.You say evolution has nothing to do with big bang,abiogenisis ect.,however when you look at a school book it lumps it all together and teaches all these theories as facts.
CBALLEN 3 years ago
I can see why you might not think so about abiogenesis and big bang cosmology, but evolution has been tested indeed and is a verified fact. And as far as DNA being information, sorry, it's just sugars, phosphate, and a purine/pyrimidine base that translates to a codon for a specific amino acid carried to it by the charged tRNA. It's not inforamtion, but it is very complicated biochemistry. And I do understand it very well.
magick205 3 years ago
Why do you argue that DNA is not information when everyone knows it is?Just take a paper and pencil and write your name on it.True the paper and pencil are matter but your name is information that came from outside of the two.
CBALLEN 3 years ago
Who on earth are you speaking for? Everyone? Biologists, biochemists, and genetic engineers who work with this stuff everyday call it what it is. Complex, but understandable. And still just chemistry. It's further proof of the natural tendency of order to arise from disorder in certain systems. No violation of the 2nd law, just the nature of biochemistry.
magick205 3 years ago
Dan just admit that you do not want to believe a Creator is possible,even though the proof points to the fact that it's most probable.
CBALLEN 3 years ago
You seem to be mistaken here too, I am a deist, but the fact remains that evolution is an ongoing process in humans as well as all other life on this planet today. Ultimatley, the discussion is not about if there is a god or not. That's a matter of faith and should remain so. The question is, as a matter of science, can these things happen without god in a totally naturalistic mechanism. The answer is a resounding yes! Leave faith to faith, and science to science.
magick205 3 years ago
cited your source
or stop lying
noliesundead 3 years ago
it s like the big bang , it s no more a theory cause they made it and prove it in laboratory in geneva , how to create the Big bang.
KingXanthar 3 years ago
I like how you point out science's ability to correct itself and seek out false evidence. I'll bet you it wasn't creationist using their subjective creationist "science" that found it.
mandangalo18 3 years ago
nah not 3 but 4 foot. learn a bit if you want to be credible
yeah you re right in 1958... they have make mistake... but in 2008.. they didnt.. lol i love you you are so funny
and no.. Darwin didnt say we came from monkey.. are old are you..10 - 12 ??
You know what is DNA.. if not.. you should , DNA prove all what darwin and einstein was saying about the myth that god exist cause they know that God is only a myth , god is the answer for the weak
KingXanthar 3 years ago
lol so true
Vimtox 3 years ago
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."-Albert Einstein. learn a bit if you want to be credible
BLACKDOOM360 3 years ago
albert einstein knows the fact that we were from evolution , like gallilea , copernicus etc...
Gallilea goes in jail because he says we rent from a god. god is for the weak , to bash women , to make money , to scare people etc. i prefer to know then to be a retards
KingXanthar 3 years ago
if its a fact why do they call it the theory of evolution
BLACKDOOM360 3 years ago
well , it s no longer name a theory since 70 - 90 years
KingXanthar 3 years ago
For the same reason Heliocentricity, Gravity, Relativity and even the Atomic theory are all referred to as theories. They are scientific theories which are defined as:- An explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.
So you see the scientific theories are models based on facts. The man-in-the-street def of theory is closer to 'hypothesis'
spifflication 3 years ago
richard dawkins is still a human, and i admire his unintellectual child like manorisms.
BestVideosEver01 3 years ago
Lol...i really like the Neanderthal man one...this guy thinks there was only one skeleton found! LOL!
anarchycastro 3 years ago
sorry - just got to the Cro-magnon slide...LOL!
"one of the earliest and best established fossils is at least equal to physique and brain capacity to modern man....so whats the difference?"
LOL...this person has no clue what they're talking about.
anarchycastro 3 years ago
If you're going to post a video like this, have the courage of your convictions and allow ratings. Be honest, stand up for what you believe in.
pulsfordp 3 years ago 3
And the genius who made this video thinks we came from a relative of the tooth fairy.
Hellcat040369 3 years ago 2
no no no his believe is a lot smarted than that.
he believes that a magical sky daddy got bored and decided to *poof* everything into existance =D
i can see how he thinks he has authority over science..
hajidude 3 years ago
First of all, I LOVE how he spells evolution on the first slide: "EVOLTUION" priceless.
Also, Dawkins and Darwin think/thought that we came for an ancestor of the chimpanzee, not a monkey. They are completely separate species. It's like confusing carrots and potatoes. :)
mud213 3 years ago
isnt a chimpanzee a type of monkey?
dadodson 3 years ago
Nope, a chimp is a type of primate. Monkeys are primates too along with humans, lemurs, aye-aye, bushbabies, tarsier, marmosets, macaque, mandrills, langur, gibbons, bonobo etc.
Chimps belong to a special category called great apes which include: orangutan, gorilla, chimps, bonobo and us humans. So you could say chimps are apes but you can't say monkeys are chimps or chimps are monkeys.
mud213 3 years ago
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh
dadodson 3 years ago
ape
hajidude 3 years ago
wow, this guy has some terrible videos...good thing he blocked ratings
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
youtube . c o m /watch?v=Q88r9jUarCc
thecommonsenseguy 3 years ago
Notice how all those claims were debunked by scientists, not creationists...
HelixTheThinker 3 years ago 4
HelixTheThinker "Notice how all those claims were debunked by scientists, not creationists... "
Of course.....creationists are appallingly lazy & never attempt to do any real science
brospec 3 years ago
"This genius thinks we came from a monkey"
That statement is flawed.
We came from chimps.
Backwaterguy 3 years ago
Oh btw kornissues9, you have more reasons to disagree with evolution? Because the ones you explained in all these videos are just lies that you thought were correct.
If evolution was false explain:
- pseudogenes that dont belong in our genome such as genes for making eggs.
- jumping genes that match the tree of life
- silent mutations that match the tree of life
- over 50 speciation events...
evolution explains these, no other theory/hypothesis does. Evolution is scientific...rest is dogmatic
Terrencje 3 years ago
-Lucy is not the only fossil of his/her kind.
-Nebraskaman wasn't built out of one tooth. It was an artis who drew the picture out of his imagination with no scientific basis whatsoever.
-Piltdown was later on a real problem for evolutionists because all the other ancestors came from Africa, it was better for creationists if this fossil was not a fake
-neanderthal man, over 500 fossils and only 1 found with arthritis...no Homo neanderthalensis was not human
this vid=fail too
Terrencje 3 years ago 2
WTF is an "Evolutionary Chart" - this video is total bullshit
wildcrazygoats 3 years ago 2
Cant you idiot creationists even spell???
wildcrazygoats 3 years ago 4
you heard gods voice in your head and she told you to twist the truth to your small minds ability to understand reality - didn't she?
science has long since shown these to either be errors or made up shit from people like you who continue to perpetuate nonscience crap.
Please leave science to us. The scientific community.
You don't pray in our schools and we wont think in your church!
Deal!?!
fotokuts 3 years ago
You don't pray in our schools and we wont think in your church!
Very good!!!!
brospec 3 years ago
Can anyone find a reference to "New Guinea Man" supposedly being a transitional hominid fossils as this video implies???
I think it is just another example of creationists telling lies for Jesus
brospec 3 years ago
Care to cite which scientists said that? If you say something, cite it please. Btw, that is like 9 of the hundreds fossils we found. I bet we found fossils going into the thousands.
Pawn2King4 3 years ago
the last part "This genius thinks we came from a monkey" really sums up this video.
Only ignorant creationists say such incredibly stupid things
brospec 3 years ago
How is it stupid, it is how the evolutionist mind thinks.
kornissues9 3 years ago
How is it stupid, it is how the evolutionist mind thinks.
What - that we came from monkeys?? Nobody with the slightest knowledge of evolution says that....it is a claim made by lazy ignorant creationists
brospec 3 years ago
Alright then smart arse, you seem to know everything, and you obviously dont believe in a god, where did we come from? how did "us" come to be?
kornissues9 3 years ago
Do you really think your god wants you to put your dishonest, ill informed drivel on YouTube?? Is he so weak and pathetic that you have to lie for him and done even bother checking your facts?? You just regurgitate, mindlessly, the nonsense published by Chick Publications - your are mocking god
brospec 3 years ago
Completly avoided the question, have not answerd me at all, instead attempted to put me in the wrong.
Ill ask again, where did we come from then?
and no he doesnt need to be protected, why do you even say that, and what am i even lying about eh? and how am i mocking god? im intriuged
kornissues9 3 years ago
OK -firstly,your claims:
Lucy:"3' chimp"- no scientist claims that,you are telling lies
Heidelberg Man : "quite human" oh really? Does your family have jaws like that?
Nebraska Man : previously discussed-you are misrepresenting
Piltdown Man : as you know,was proven (of course, not by creationists) to be a hoax over 50 years ago
Peking man : yes,the original fossils are missing (did evolutionary biologists stage WW2 to get rid of them?) We have casts of originals & new fossils have been found
brospec 3 years ago
....cont
Cro Magnon: "whats difference to man" - no scientist claims there is a real difference
Neanderthal : "old man with arthritis - Cave" "This is not to deny that his limbs, as well as his skull, exhibit distinctive features - features which collectively distinguish him from all groups of modern men. In other words, his "total morphological pattern", in the phraseology of Le Gros Clark (1955) differs from that of "sapiens" man." (Straus, Jr. and Cave 1957) - seems you lied about this also
brospec 3 years ago
So ....if you want to plagiarise other peoples sloppy work : (i) pick someone better than Chick - he is lazy & dishonest (ii) Do some original research yourself - you have shown to be equally lazy
& dishonest
If you are seriously interest about where life originated , dont expect an answer on YouTube...search Abiogenesis yourself....it is an area of admittedly little research but there is a lot of information readily available-you only have your ignorance to lose
brospec 3 years ago
"and no he doesnt need to be protected, why do you even say that, and what am i even lying about eh? and how am i mocking god? im intriuged"
If your God does not need to be protected why are you telling such appalling lies to support him (i.e. denigrate evolution)??? To me, telling lies in Gods name is mocking him, debasing the lessons of the bible....you know : THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS
brospec 3 years ago
Look about the neanderhtals,it doesn't prove that they never existed.The significance about the fact that he had artherites was meant to disprove the sterotype that all neanderthals stood with backs bent.
colbertLOTR91 3 years ago
The title page spells evolution incorrectly....it is downhill from there.
Is stupidity a requirement of entry for the creationist club??
brospec 3 years ago
Korni, did it ever occur to you that these weren't the only fossils we have ever found?
WeedGreenPowerRanger 3 years ago 2
And what did those "other" fossils prove?
1GoodAngel 3 years ago
Confirmed the unifying theory of Biology: Evolution.
BTW, I'm answering this question, because the director of this video blocked him.
Piewack1t 3 years ago
EPIC FAIL. This video shows your utter lack of knowledge on the subject of Evolution. The evidence you've given is infantile. We don't come from monkeys, you idiot. We share a common ancestor..
Now, please explain the identical endogenous retroviral insertion points as well as differing ones after seperation, plus the fact that our chromosome number 2 is a fusion with ancestral chimp chromosome 13 - shown by telomeres in the wrong place and two centromeres of which one has become inactivated
AddANumberToThis 3 years ago 2
Boy ..is this guy out of date with his misinformation .I thought creationists would have more self respect than to keep trotting out this shit. It's undignified....even for them!
Tobytrim 3 years ago 5
Not a single reputable scientist has ever, ever said that Lucy was a chimpanzee. Homo Heidelburgensis was indeed quite human (genus Homo), but obviously not modern, as the fossils we've found have shown. Nebraska man was a highly speculative error which was corrected by scientists (not creationists). Piltdown man was a hoax perpetrated by British nationalists trying to inflate Britain's anthropologic prestige after the Neanderthal discoveries in Germany, again corrected by scientists.
annoyedandroid 3 years ago 4
Dr. Cave never suggested that Neanderthals were modern humans with arthritis, he instead corrected the mistaken belief that Neanderthals had stooped posture based on the mis-articulation of the remains of an individual with advanced arthritis. It is simply laughable to imagine that the suite of traits defining Neanderhtals could possibly be caused by arthritis, or any other disease. Finally, New Guinea and Cro-Magnon man were not our ancestors, they were Homo Sapiens, in a word they were "us".
annoyedandroid 3 years ago 3
'This genius thinks we came from a monkey'.Lets have some fun,quote just ONE source for this claim.I dare you.
jesuslives57 3 years ago 2
"'This genius thinks we came from a monkey'.Lets have some fun,quote just ONE source for this claim.I dare you."
The great "Dr " Hovind claims that....idiots flock together
brospec 3 years ago
the charts came from the media's understanding of what evolution teaches..
The reality is even more unbelivable---evolution teaches that life spring from rocks...that life came from non-living matter which disproved by real science years ago...
gerry37g 3 years ago
"the charts came from the media's understanding of what evolution teaches.." So , you think it is bullshit also??? Like "the media's " columns on astrology???
"evolution teaches that life spring from rocks.." This is the sort of dishonest drivel that only an ignorant creationist would say
brospec 3 years ago
That is what evolution teaches, otherwise evolution, "change of something over great periods of time" can simply be called, adaption :)
ill ask someone other than brospec because he seems incapable of answering me how we came to be if god dosent exist and evolution somehow does not teach that we evolved from a single cell organism millliionnnnsss of years ago.
kornissues9 3 years ago
That is what evolution teaches, otherwise evolution, "change of something over great periods of time" can simply be called, adaption :) How is adaption not part of evolution??
ill ask someone other than brospec because he seems incapable of answering me how we came to be if god dosent exist and evolution somehow does not teach that we evolved from a single cell organism millliionnnnsss of years ago.
I didnt say that - our common ancestor is a simple single celled organism
brospec 3 years ago 2
That is what evolution teaches, otherwise evolution, "change of something over great periods of time" can simply be called, adaption :)
So what is your excuse for posting all those lies about the "Evolutionary Chart"??? You copied the work of an idiot?? You were too lazy to look it up yourself??
brospec 3 years ago 3
Repeating creationist lies doesn't invalidate reality... We have the fossils, we win.
Who ever used the Piltdown man to prove anything? Who says we have only one (!) Neandertal skeleton? Creationists are not afraid to lie for the greater "good"...
Johannes9126 3 years ago 6
Lucy stood up straight, since when do chimpanzees do that?
And the phylogenetic chart shows we never came from 'monkeys'
Monkeys and apes speciated from the prosimians
Monkeys predate the earliest classified apes (Such as Aegyptopithecus) by a few thousand years.
We are a speciation of Homonids and Australopithenes
ProcInc 3 years ago 3
The real ape is the idiot that believes evolution teaches we came from monkeys.A shocking lack of knowledge.
FEAROFFEET 4 years ago 2
Does anyone else notice a disturbing lack of sources for the information in this video?
Onithyr 4 years ago 2
Its a direct copy of a page from that reliable source, Wikipeapia.
FEAROFFEET 4 years ago 2
Actually i didnt even go on the net to get these =]
kornissues9 4 years ago
"Actually i didnt even go on the net to get these =]"
So you just made it all up? ok that's fine as long as you admit it.
Onithyr 4 years ago 3
No to that too =] i got them from a book x]
kornissues9 4 years ago
"i got them from a book x]"
Ah. And that book would be...(I'm expecting credible sources here)
Onithyr 4 years ago 4
'heidelberg man' huh? okaaay. we have many specimins of homo heidelbergensis, just take a look at my hominids vids for a few. Peking man didn't disappear numbnuts, they were destroyed in during a war, however we made casts prior to it and we have numerous specimins of homo erectus( of which Peking man was from) as well.
'new guinea man'? no such thing. cro-magnon, 'what's the difference', ummm maybe that it's some 30,00 years old?
agentorange20 3 years ago 3
I love the show, keep up the good work
cthojsanders 4 years ago
Sorry to burst your little bubble but A Afrarensis is not remotely related to chimps.
And you should be ashamed for even mentioning Nebraska Man, which was recognized a fake more then a century ago. To even bring this fake artificat to the table really demonstrates just how dishonest some supposed born again Christians are!
lawilson200 4 years ago 5
what the lucy was not a chimp
deadman1144 4 years ago