Added: 4 years ago
From: WelcomeToKilltown
Views: 34,511
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (171)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Obviously fake... there were also no flames visible on the impact hole where the plane went through... and why was there BLACK SMOKE emerging from this impact hole?

  • @mrmike677 Oh.. and the other 40 angles??

    Boy that is some digital pipeline the government has. Fully rendered, match moved, particle systems, explosions, modeled planes rendered and delivered THE SAME DAY!!.. Fauck.. they must have a cray super computer on the rendering. And fully photo real!! OMG. Takes ILM 5 months to turn around a shot like this.

    If only you knew how completely ridiculous what you just said was.

  • @mrmike677 So i guess the lady who borrowed her friends digital camera and had hardly ever used one and ended up catching U 175 scream in over battery park and got it published in hundreds of American papers that day.

    She is really on Cheney's payroll is she? The logic fail you Bush haters and Truther nuts display is nothing short of STUNNING.

  • Funny thing...

    I think that most people who actually believe everything they see on video would have a eye-vision exactly like this...

  • yeah like the fires really gonna reach that floor another 20 storeys up

  • I have a degree in computer animation and normally I would dismiss this kind of conspiracy type video. But I have to say I do see a bit of fakeness. Hard to put your finger on it but if it's fake, it's very good fake.

  • now you guys see, how easy it is, to fake tv-images

  • EXTREMELY FAKE

  • compare it to actual footage, there's plenty of that

  • yeh fake one, but it did look something like there but i fink it was more fire inside the rather it being on the outside

  • fake

  • FAKE!

  • definetly fake

  • Is there a point?

  • Is this BBC?

  • @pwnedunoob890 Okay, but still, the crash shows the hit being right in the center.

  • WTC1 was hit near the top by the 95-110th floors, approximately. Why does this show both hit in the middle?

  • @SecretService80 it doesnt...it looks like the middle cuz the south tower is in the FOREground

  • @SelectedHandfull Then the North Tower is hit low in back too. They're BOTH hit in the center. It's fake.

  • It's pretty obvious that everything in that video is fake. I'd be interested to know the context of it though, and where it is from.

  • those fires seem clearly fake to me

  • FAKE KA KA

  • well of course its fake, no-one seems to have noticed that the first hit was on the opposite side to the second, but in this video both impact holes are visible on the same side......grapics student practising effects is right

  • @davidr2105 There's a quite reasonable explanation for that........you see, the second "plane" went all the way through that steel-reinforced boxed-column tower! It even came out the other side with it's composite nosecone completely undamaged! Amazing! Just because it defies the Laws of Physics, logic and plain common sense, it''s still a reasonable explanation .........isn't it.......?

    Answer: There is no spoon.

  • carbon dioxide bullshit is hilarious..

    takes all the heat away from the companies producing and dumping heavy sulphides and metal smogs.. remember those companies? yea thats pollution..

    CO2 is plant food

  • fake and look at the south tower's smoke it's not real

  • WTF? Never seen this one, and I thought I'd seen them all...

  • INCREDIBLY FAKE

  • There's only one tower, obviously fake.

  • F A K E FAKE!!!!

  • "Were almost sure now, that this is the work of tourists"

    lol

    Why would they put a fake fire on top of the building?.. Some news stations are stupid

  • I agree WTF Terrorists? How could ANYONE say that at THAT TIME? Planted idea started almost instantly. What a joke.

  • Well i see your point, but i disagree on some parts, i'll give you en example, i was 12 when i watched this live, i'm from Mexico i live in a town called Monterrey, we didnt have school that morning cause it was raining quite hard, anyway i clearly remember myself saying.....when the second plane hit that it was an attack, i mean it was obvious.

    Altho i do find it odd that they could point out who attacked them in less than a day, in this case bin laden and where they came from.

  • They were making the STATEMENT of Terrorists and NAMING THEM 1 Fracking HOUR after the attack?

    There was NO FACTUAL BASIS FOR THAT.

  • @Magnus2552112 - Except they knew planes had been hijacked and they went off radar in new york, and there were calls made from the planes.

  • There is were you are wrong.

    They NEVER WENT OFF RADAR.

    They lost TRANSPONDER CODE ONLY.

    Those planes WERE TRACKED FOR OVER 20 MINUTES and no MILITARY INTERCEPT.

    The Plane that hit the Pentagon WAS TRACKED FOR 22 MINUTES and there COULD HAVE BEEN F-16 IN TWO MINUTES.

    NOT ONE INTERCEPT WAS EVER SENT.

    We BUILT Air Force ON PURPOSE to PROTECT the PENTAGON.

    The Pentagon STRIKE WAS A SAD JOKE.

    It is the most PROTECTED BUILDING on the Planet.

    IN RESTRICTED AIR SPACE????

  • "They NEVER WENT OFF RADAR"

    Uh, they did when they hit the building.

    "NOT ONE INTERCEPT WAS EVER SENT."

    That's not true.

    "the most PROTECTED BUILDING on the Planet."

    And the Titanic was unsinkable.

  • LOL, when they hit the building LOL what a Moron.

    You still have NOT ANSWERED how AN AIRCRAFT CAN BE TRACKED FOR 22 minutes 10 in RESTRICTED AIR SPACE and NOTHING, NOTHING NOTHING was done about it.

    You are such a Moron with your statements you are either 8 years old or a Troll.

    There is not other answer to your response. A child could have BETTER logic.

  • @Magnus2552112 - Why are you so angry?  You don't even know me. Why don't you just stick to the topic and give the insults a rest?

    Your original question was:

    "I agree WTF Terrorists? How could ANYONE say that at THAT TIME?"

    I'm just saying that when you hear someone saying there hijacking the plane on radio, then you get calls saying the plane has been hijacked, then the transponders are turned off, then the plane disappears, it's not that hard to figure out.

  • Because I was Talking about the PENTAGON.

    As for the TOWERS well THAT WAS NOT PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE that they had been Hi Jacked.

    All they knew was the plans had switched off Transponder codes, when radio silent, went off flight path.

    It happens almost at the same time.

    It caused confussion when 4 aircraft had done that at almost the same time or one after another.

    THEY DID NOT ANNOUNCE to the press that they had HIJACKED PLANES

  • @Magnus2552112

    "Because I was Talking about the PENTAGON."

    Thanks for clarifying.

    "well THAT WAS NOT PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE that they had been Hi Jacked."

    Sure, not until they said it on the news.

    "It caused confussion when 4 aircraft had done that at almost the same time or one after another."

    Of course, leading to difficulty in knowing where to scramble fighters. We agree. I knew we could find middle ground.

  • The smoke is clearly generated with particles. An the fire is obviously composited on top of it. The video is fake, but it was not on the news the day it happened. So for all we know it was some CGI student practicing effects.

  • there was never any visible flame. only black smoke. take note also that these flames are clearly faked

  • Yea this is a clear fake.

  • I'm British and that news report sounds very fake to me.

  • Comment removed

  • WHAT THE FUCK the roof never had fire only the middle parts of the wtc Fake

  • Just shows you how easy it is to make someone believe something through TV fakery.

  • This is not real!! South tower burn on the topp hahaha.. No No!!

  • Some people on Youtube posted there own videos. I'm sure at least some of these videos were not sent to a news station or confiscated by the government. I am just not going to believe that EVERY person that posted a video on youtube about the wtc was posting a fake plane crash. Come on lets be realistic.

  • south tower looks real but look at the north tower WTF do you call that it just looks exactly like the south tower,the plane hitted in the middle of the north tower not on the side like the south tower and look on other videos do you see a fuckin fire on a roof?!?!?! NO!

  • I never said this video was real!!! I just said planes did hit the buildings! And yes I do see the fake fire on the top of the south tower. Next time look at the comments people make a little harder, I never said this video is real!!!!

  • You guys! The planes are completely real! The South Tower hit was the most viewed event! How could every person on Youtube fake a video like that? Just believe it.

  • How the hell would you know? They didn't know the size, shape, prop or jet, NOTHING. There were even reporters saying people saw a missile. It wasn't until the videos started coming through, that were aired and shared on all the major networks, which could easily be fakes, that people started saying they were 757s. United Airlines took about 4 hours to say it was their plane. Oh, and there is not a shot with any of those planes having color. You know? Like a real plane's paint job?

  • The planes at best are drones, by remote control. AT worst, they are CGI. All plane footage on youtube is taken off of TV. The scripts and images were fed to the TV stations, so of course every video would show a plane. Check out Sept. CLues

  • every footage ive seen shows a fake plane. i think the nbc footage with the small object is the only real footage. its not a plane cause the object was too small. the news reporters that it was a heli. i believe there were no hijackings, just bombs in the building

  • they dont show fake planes, u just believe that

  • im gunna go out on a limb here and recomend the firing squad for you and your family.

  • 100% FAKE. and also pancake theory fails and so does plane blowing off fireproofing. fact is jet fuel fire cant melt steel, especially in 2 hrs, and the laws of physics and common sense make `pancaking` impossible. and wtc 7? 911 is the biggest conspiracy of all time and the whole world saw. RIP freedom

  • still i think thermite made it crumble into dust.

    look at the bright silvery flash in the basement fire.

    thats not fuel but chemicals from thermite.

  • two south towers,suspected ahhaa

  • No it's not fake though. It's real. They just added the fire on top just to make the viewers think it's really damaged. And you can see the smoke around the crash to make think it's really damaged too.

  • My parents know that the WTC was going down in 9/11

    They were born before 1963 (Before the construction of the towers). They saw the construction parts in the Eighties, and they know that that the building can't stand a Boeing 737 or Boeing 747 or higher.

    Twin Towers II must have more columns.

  • No, they didn't. Nobody but the men who did it knew it was going to happen. What does seeing the plans for construction got to do with a terrorist attack 20 years later.. Use your head, and there is no 'Twin Towers 2' It's called the Freedom Tower and it's 1 building.

  • mmm it was teste to stand a boeing 737 but a 747 or 757 was not. because they were build later then the towers,

  • WTC can take a boeing 737 the thing that happened was it blew the fireproofing off the steel which made it fall

  • You can see that the South Tower kinda looks messed up which that was done with editing on a computer.

  • This is obviously fake and it wasn't made by the media or the government. This is amateur work. It's a picture with animated smoke and flames imposed, mixed with a camera motion effect...

  • looks real. Thats a real shot he just added fire and more smoke

  • No one wants to believe anything different, that's the problem, you can show all the proof you want, it won't matter.

  • on the roof???? man the goverment cant make it look reall..

  • Damn, did the government plant explosives on the roof too?

  • all 3 fires and commentary faked.very obvious

  • yes i agree, if you look closely, everything is faked

  • Ciekawe skąd ten ogień znalazł sie na dachu wieży drugiej. Ciekawe

  • This is one of the few videos that I've seen that actually shows the south view after the hit. This does not look fake, and saying that it is fake is an idiotic claim. There is obviously something going on here that started a fire on the ROOF. Use your friggen heads, and ask yourself why we only have 11 seconds of this video.

  • Definitely fake. look at the gray smoke on the left. it appears from thin air, like in a game. However, C3POROBOT1, if you think that this was not a terrorist attack, you will really enjoy the movie Zeitgeist. Look it up in google and watch it. Part 2 I believe is about the world trade center attacks and in the movie they explain how it could have been set up to give a reason for US to go into iraq. Seems hard to believe? Watch it, there's tremendous amounts of proof in that video.

  • Yeah, typical shill reply'WATCH ZEITGIEST, NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS, MOVE ALONG, WATCH SOMETHING ELSE". Once again, WHY ONLY 11 SECONDS, AND HOW DID KILLTOWN OBTAIN THIS VIDEO !

  • That's not at all what it was like. I though you were a decent someone who would appreciate more of the same. But no. I guess youre just an arrogant stump, dumb enough to presume what I am like, and to think this is real.

  • Does your mom know you're on the computer?

  • Gee, you're awfully mature for a 42 year old.

  • very fake

  • it's amazing who would of thought that fire could rise. it's not like there were any ventilation or elevator shafts.

  • Fake.

  • your all a bunch of useless, fucked up, paranoid psycos. get a fuckin life

  • killtown added that fire himself..its real footage that was altered by killtown

  • Any evidence?

  • any evidence that the fire made it ti the roof? .. u know anything can be photo shopped right?

  • No, no, no, you misunderstand me. I'm not contending this footage is fake, I'm contending that Killtown was the one who faked it.

    (Oh goodness, you made me defend Killtown)

  • damn armchair ur an idiot

  • Because I ask for you to prove Killtown faked this video?

    You're better off claiming Mark Bingham talked to NORAD while saying 'Let's Roll'!

  • no i didnt . proof ?

  • Back when you were bobo480 you sent a message to ACR claiming that Bingham talked to NORAD and said 'Let's Roll'. The message was dated December 27th, 2007.

  • armchair .... u know this was photo shopped .. why mus u be a bobo bout this ??

  • This video was photoshopped. I never contended that. I'm contending your claim that Killtown faked this, stop being a douche.

  • i never said faked .. i said altered .. [photo shopped] .. yea some how the fire reached to the roof ... god armchair .. ur not that dumb are uuuuu

  • If I take a picture of a lawn with a tree, and 'alter' it to put Keebler elves in it, am I faking the image?

    You're an idiot, and not very witty.

  • you're the idiot ... and no its not faking it .. its digitally inhancing it .. the footage is still there dumbass .. ive never seen u give any source of proof while debating, except give us debunking websites ... hey armchair guess what IM A official story believer now .... i believe 9.11 was done by MUSLIMS .YAY

  • Go back to being a Truther so you'll have an excuse for embarrassing yourself.

  • the 1 who speaks .. thats why u repy in a matter of seconds when u get replied .. u visit 9.11 vids and profiles all day every day .. what does ur family think bout ur 9.11 addiction .. are they gonna send u to 9.11 annoynamus

  • Google 'Non-Sequitor'.

  • george carlin 4 president

    trey parker 4 vice president

    08 .. armchair .. if thats who would run

    would you vote 4 them ??? yay i would

  • ha u wonder why this guy says its rare cuz he made it

  • I don't want to say this, but ¿do you added that fucking fire at top of the south tower to upload it and say "it's fake"? What i know, the real video doesn't have it. Answer me, please

  • lol what a fake

  • THIS IS RUBBISH

  • A lot of TV Fakery was used on 911 putting into question much of the footage I think this footage has at least been tampered with the flames look fake!

  • ANYTHING you look at too close with a presupposition that it's fake is going to look fake. 100 percent.

    Their best evidence hiding strategy is hollering fake at everything.

    This is what the second hit plane shape hole looked like. That is what flames look like.

    There is no reason or purpose for faking this, but footage of the second hit plane shape hole is very rare.

    The footage should be displayed wider. Out of aspect is not the same as fake.

  • ou can tell iuts fuckin fake for christ sake the holes are in the wrong place.

  • People are becoming to think Killtown is a shill beacuase of this. Why? The video does not look completly real although, the cameraman pans in on the fire. And it looks more realistic then the fake media video's.

    I think it's real but edited to have the black smoke and more fire in it.

  • Oh, maybe people should read KT's description!

    " Rare video showing a roof fire on top of the South WTC tower and fire coming out of it's gash that is suspected to be a fake. Interesting to note that the camera pans up to the roof fire as if it is really there.

    The building seen in the foreground is the 19 Rector St building, the one 'missing' in the Michael Hezarkhani video.

    Source of this video is unknown..."

  • What's up with this video????

    Totally fake. I suppose someone has made this on their PC. Also the "newscaster" voice sounds TOTALLY FAKE (i.e. NOT from a real TV station/ radio station) - sort of amateurish and unprofessional.

    If this turns out to be a "real" fake video (now it's getting confusing, huh?) then I would personally sue the relevant news-channel for bad graphics.

    Really, what is the deal with this video?

  • nope.

  • That looks so incredibly fake. Funny, how ever other angle (including the original one this video was made from) shows NO fire on the roof, NO white smoke coming out of the building...

    The fucking towers are even two different colors.

    Who do you think you're fooling?

  • crazy there is a fire on the roof....

  • wow. there was a fire on top of the tower too?

    clearly a fake. but why is killtown posting this? and why does he say but why would someone want to fake that? this is some mad shit going on here.

  • To overly paranoid hunterswine. I got this clip from a skeptics site. I had seen it years ago. It's always intrigued me about the rooftop fire and the way the cam pans up to it like it real.

  • I suspect, as I said, that the courchesne began life as a genuine video of the real events.

    One of the reasons I think such is the camera moves away from the action at wtc1 and, in what we see, takes a loving look at the plume of smoke, now blowing in a straight line due south.

    Are you kidding me? The cameraman saw aircraft and videoed it. It was processed out.

  • Actually I agree with you. I don't think Killtown is lying but maybe it was edited but there was a fire on the roof. It could have been smaller or something.

  • I don't want to get all soppy/sticky, but killtown can commit a number of sins before I will really lose my temper.

    The guy has an extraordinary collection of videos that the gov doesn't want us to have and he makes them available. We really should be backing his material up.

    He was one of the earliest to realize how pervasive the bushit is, but, just like the rest of us, it is hard to believe these perps would go that far.

  • what is real what is fake? this may be real and the rest fake...

  • Black smoke coming from North Tower, white Smoke coming from South. Civil war at the WTC?

  • My PC allows some, what, 36000 colors?

    The animators had a choice of colors and they used them!

    All black smoke is 100% fake. Most white is. The only real smoke is white wispy smoke form the demo explosions.

    BTW, the same is true at the pentagon.

  • Guys, we need some patience here.

    Every 911 video is a fake. Remember please; TV fakery!

    Some videos began life as true records that had the truth processed out of them (maybe courchesne)

    Others are fakes ab intitio; WNYW, CNN

    But, there is no true record anywhere.

    Sit back, chill out. If the video has any kind of fides, we'll hear about it. If it doesn't, it will disappear - cause the gov and the media will not have any discussions of TV fakery.

  • also look at the fire pattern in the middle of both towers its the same.look just the fact that the first tower is hit in the middle should be a red flag. the fire is a copy paste. kt can not be trusted

  • wt? have you been sleeping well?

  • i think he has, cuz i agree with hunterswine

  • i was the first person to wtch this at 6:30am yesterday and i knew it was a fake. anyone who watched it can see that. why would kt upload a fake? the debate is over,black and white its fake,even damage to both towers,weird looking smoke and never seen till now. kt needs to be removed from any 9/11 truth movment! he just joined the ranks of gary weltz fact

  • Yeah wtf, how did KT get this video?

  • What if he just came across it on-line and posted it up?

    What if someone sent it to him as an elaborate fake made at home, to prove how easy it is to falsify footage?

    These questions need to be answered before we all pounce on him like some kittens on a big red ball of string!!!

  • The video has been processed without a doubt. The demo squibs above the 'plane hole' attract my attention. That's the white wispy smoke I spoke of and look at the sequencing.

    If this video started life as genuine, those explosions are the best I have seen.

  • But...

    Those squibs have been covered up with fake smoke.

  • hang on a min lol. the clip is fake. both "plane entery" holes are in the middle of the towers ... one was at the top. thats faked.

  • WelcomeToKilltown says

    'Some people believe the fire on the roof is fake, but why would someone want to fake that? Notice how the camera zooms up to the roof fire as if it is really there'

    That would be me. All WTC black smoke and fire was fake. All of it. Most white smoke was also. The only real smoke was the smoke from the demo charges - white wispy.

    If the vid was genuine prior to processing, the cameraman saw an explosion or a person or something. That's why.

  • The real question is, where is the full context of this video clip?

  • exactly im getting sick and tired of this stupid 11 second clips that don't even explain what the fuck they are showing to an outsider. we need longer clips more meaning full clips and clips explained.

  • lewisdream

    I agree more explanation is called for, but we have formidible foes; YT.

    I personally wish that every uploader would tell us exactly where it came from, but that might be real tuff for the reposters.

  • ty once again you amaze me lol. well explained.

  • kt is the only uploader of this slap to the truth

  • if his point was to show that fake clips can be made then why in the about vid does he claim this is real. he tell us to look up as to not see the even damage of the 2 buildings. notice the speed of the smoke on the right side {viewers right} its double time. this makes me so mad cause killtown is supposed to be a trusted name. why hasent he retuned any emails or tried to defend his name?

  • if anyone can find this clip UPLOADED BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN KT. please let me know.

  • One thing that is interesting though - if this video is real - is that if you look at the South Tower impact, you can see that there is only one small circular hole that has been punched through (missile)? There doesn't seem to be any significant penetrative damage along the engine and wingtip area - only seems like the outter column facings were shaved off.

  • Please do not tell me that is Rector St. 19! Because if it is... then wow... just wow.

  • find another clip of even damage and i'll shut up and publicly recant...

  • hunterswine- Remember most of the videos shown on the news were complete fabrications. If this looks different it *could* be because it's real. You can see the end of the burnout of the 2nd "plane" hole done with explosives, as shown with he 1st "plane" in 911 Amateur 2. The damage did look more even from the south looking north.

  • point taken. i would like to see this clip on a site that has nothing to do with killtown. why is this clip being seen here for the first time? cause he made it.please if some finds this same clip UPLOADED BY SOMEONE OTHER KT please let me know. important that it is a new upload not a copy paste

  • hunterswine- this vid (around 2:30 and after)has some still photos taken from ~south. The still photos are probably real. Although it's not a perfect comparison I don't think it contradicts this video. Also there is a lot of smoke up top in some of the photos. Is it perhaps a roof fire? Great video in any case. watch?v=9hwdJTOdEmY

  • Doubt it's real - because it does actually look VERY fake!

    The fire, and the black smoke look very fake.

    The shade of the WTCs looks fake too - too light grey.

    The roof is on fire? Hows that possible ? The plane didnt hit the fuckin roof.

    Last but not least, the "News Anchor's" voice sounds like that of a drama student in a play written by his cousin.

  • A plane didn't hit the tower peroid.

  • I know. All the plane footage looks fake as hell.

  • That's the phrase I was looking for!

    The only reality of 911 was TV fakery. Everything else we were shown on TV was false.

  • i've spent my time and energy defending the idea of fake planes cause i believe they were fake and to see a "trusted" name post a fake vid and tell us its real is a slap in the face! i made vids calling killtown,obo,web fairy ect.. american heros and now this! i feel betrayed!this is a slap in the face and discredits killtown. the holes are even! fake and i am sad...

  • What do you mean the holes are even, can you please explain?

  • look at the building on the left then look at the one on the right, the damage is on the same floors the damage is just about even. no angle can make a hole drop 70 floors. this is a fake that killtown or someone posing as killtown made! it's rare cause he made it! and you wont find anywhere else. i really hope i'm wrong i really do.

  • hunterswine- I think it's just the angle. The right tower is closer to the camera then the left. Even if this video is fake it doesn't mean killtown is a shill or tv fakery is not real. There's plenty of other instances of that!

  • i just said the same thing.

  • Killtown could be confused? Or hacked? Or atleast it's only him

  • i hope your right.

  • Even if he did change then there's still others. You would stop believing TV Fakery if someone else did?

  • how can anyone think this is real! the holes are even!!!!! your telling me everyone i trust on the net is a shill? what is going on!the holes are even the smoke is sadly fake please people this is a fake and a shill vid.

  • This is the second hit plane shape hole.

    Look at all the explosion poofs!

  • This looks real

  • fake like the war.

  • the roof is on fire, we don't need no water let the.....burn,...thats a song, remember? crazy video...fake fire?

  • holy shit your a fucking shill

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more