Cenk is right on! BOLD and ACCURATE to call Lieberman out as a "corporate whore." Nothing stings worse than the naked truth. Keep on bringing it, Cenk!
@calimar28 Cenk is nothing but a hypocrite and a puss. He would rather lie and talk shit and drag down the country than be real and talk about what's really going on. YA HEAR ME CENK. I would love to debate his punk ass.
@weseyedwalk Yeah me too, but you wont see that. Cenk doesnt like to debate anyone on the other side. He wants nothing to do with the teaparty in a debate, he would get ruined.
Viacom Inc, known for producing pornographic videos & violence-inducing gangsta rap on its MTV station, is owned by the Jewish billionaire, Sumner Redstone.
“Sumner” was actually born, “Murray Rothstein,” who resides in Newton MA.
LOGO Gay TV promotes anal sex between two males by using Biblical titles in its programming such as “Jacob & Joshua” and “Noah’s Arc.”
CBS is owned by Jews. Time-Warner is owned by Jews. ABC is owned by Jews.
I'm sick of people who are supporters of either the Democrat or Republican side. Only because Each side will throw propaganda at the opposite side's faces, making the president(s)/Senator(s) look like hitler or the antichrist. If they can't handle the decisions that political leaders make, WHY DON'T THEY RUN FOR PRESIDENT!?
Yes thats what Cenk is saying. Cenk is mad because the dems have only 59 votes, so they wont socializes us like they wanted to. And next November they will lose votes...
@calimar28 shoo troll...no ones going to give you the satisfaction of an emotional response to a comment that is obviously a troll attempt. If you want to troll properly you have to be at least a LITTLE subtle about it. So shoo...practise on some other forums first.
@boorens18 Well, we Conservatives won BIG! Historic levels! Now you dems have lost power. You down guys liek Lieberman, just because he reaches across the isle.
LOL You cry like a little bitch on your channel about name calling then you use words like "negros" thinking it is somehow not name calling. What a moron. You are a tool for the system, a troll on YouTube and a racist moron in life. In short your a dumb ass pig.
God = Jesus Christ = Sun (an actual ball of burning gas in space) = 1 Billion Christian Sun Worshiping Morons + 1 Dumb as Dirt calimar28 (a pathetic and ignorant pig)
@mymojorisin Your a fool. You have a lot to learn. You know nothing about the spirital, you know nothing about politics...your a name caller, Useless.
@mymojorisin How you gonna deal with the new GOP house? the teaparty? Your a joke. your libs are a joke. Your liberals are no longer welcome, we dont want communism, or the boy from Kenya running America as he will be defeated in 2012. You love the negro. Your a mongrel.
It's funny that this is from 2 months ago, and it's from just about the time Lieberman was in favor of the Medicare Buy-In plan, and we were still bitching about how dumb Liebs is.
coolvideogamevideos dude - you're being played - there is NO difference in left/right. its a ruse and always as been - politics is only there to make you feel like you've got a say - you and i do not have a say - my incrediby wealthy freinds - do not. the sad fact is they are controlling us you and I and we are ...fucked, without drastic measures being taken. seek those measures and people.
Hey, we are anti-private industrial insurance greed and control. Why suddenly does Joe play anti-public and anti-govt out of blue so suddenly? We should all play anti-Semitic more often because of him.
Leiberman: "I, uh, um, uh, don't think...think we're trying to do too, too much. I'm, um, uh, concerned, that, that, it's going to, to, um, cost, too much, so I think, we should, should, just wait, until, until the recession is over, so, I, I, oppose the public option".
Anyone want to guess how much Leiberman accepted in insurance company money these past two years? Half a million? A million? Nope. Leiberman sold us out for over a million dollars.
Lieberman should ave been ot down 10 years ago. If Gore had a chance then he would have been our VP! People forget. And Don Imus? WTF? Rutgers should have lynched him. Very bad guys both of them. How could Joe go down to Florida and campaign for McCain?
Millions of people do not have health insurance in America. Many people go bankrupt because they don't have health insurance and tens of thousands die each year because they don't have health care.
Lieberman is a prostitute of the health insurance industry. Ironically, the majority in his own state wants the public option. Lieberman is a fucking asshole.
No, you liberals suck blackman. You suck because you turn on your own when they do anything you disagree with. So you turned on Joe a few years back and he almost didnt get into the Senate. Now it is payback time. Now you are getting the hand you delt yourselves.
wow when did independents become pussies, i agree with tyt that the democrats are more of a independent party than a left wing party and democrats seriously have no balls. this country needs a left wing party so we can find true middle ground give me a hand full of politicans who are atheists, gay, legal pot, envoimental hardwingers and then we may see a drastic change in politics cause frankly the right has gone so far right that its wrong
Yuou think I am condoning the republicans? You have another thing coming. Both sides have thouroughly wrecked this country. The only way forward is with a Ron Paul.
Oh that's right, in this universe, Gore was not elected president, he went on to get the Nobel prize, and Joe Lieberman did not become president after Gore was assassinated.
Yes it is. The last 10 years the earth has cooled. Now Gore changed it from global warming to "climate change". Wow, didnt reveal that its just a fraud, did he?
Snow not on Kilimanjero. So what? In nature things change. What was a cave 100 years ago, might now be underwater, or eroded. Things change in nature. Global warming is a fraud to get the goverment to take over buisness. For fucks sake, are you liberals that stupid? I have to explain it?
Well I'm afraid I'll listen to the scientists, most of which are not liberal or conservative or from the USA or care about our politics. Man is a part of nature, we have made an impact on our world, the science of global warming is not difficult and is in fact very logical and measurable. You'll care when the coasts are flooded, half of Florida is under water and the Mississippi becomes an inland sea as it was millions of years ago. BTW I'm not a liberal and not a democrat or republican.
Global warming isnt even happening, as the earth has COOLED in the last 10 years. That aside, every century and every decade the earth gets warm, then cold, then warm, etc. ITS PART OF NATURE FFS! The globe warms due to the sun and volcanos...94%. The other 6% is due to us. I dont want goverment redistrbuting the wealth from here, to the 3rd world nations because of 6%.
Wake up...its a damn power grab by the liberals, and Gore wont even debate it...because he is a fraud.
No it hasn't, temperatures have not cooled. You're viewing this like a football game and not something that threatens us. Perhaps that 6% is enough to tip the scales towards global change that is going to be really difficult to deal with. We'll see.
Fair enough...6% is under our control and should be curbed. In the mean time I dont want to shut down the worlds largest coal mines (which produce half of our electric), and close off the oil derrecks in Texas. We have to have power...you try living without it. And "green tech" powering our cities is decades away. The goverment wants to control the power producers and that is what this is really about.
You folks apparently haven't read President Joe Lieberman's eulogy of Al Gore, who was assassinated by an Iranian-Arab, making Joe President. and beginning the Third World War?
You haven't?
Oh.
Alternate history in some other universe I guess.
darkfirelights you are 100% right about lieberman's Messages are full. and that neon-con didn't erase them for a very good reason. he don't want to hear the American people. he is just moved by money and power. just like all the republicans !!! and i really hope that they don't have stupid people out there that will vote for him the next time he is up for election. if anyone from connecticut out there PLEASE DON'T VOTE FOR LIEBERMAN !!! he's distroying the american dream for everyone !!!
When you cut it finacially you cut benefits. Many doctors and hospitals will opt out and decline it. Services will be cut is the result. They could also change who qualifies such as age and incomes.
Republicans do not want to cut anything. They do not have any bill. The dems are blaming republicans as usual as that is there tactic.
WHY AMERICA DOESN'T want "other" countries.. GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE! Average...**TAX FREEDOM DAYS** (DATE you'll have to work until you get to KEEP YOUR HARD EARNED MONEY!) US..... April 13th Spain.. May 21st UK......May 14th Canada..... June 6th Germany... July 8th France...... July 16th Sweden.... July 29th NOTE: these numbers do NOT reflect the HIGH National Sales Tax other countries have in comparison to the US... US 9%, UK 17.5%, France 20%
Lieberman endorsed McCain because he knew Obama is socialist. He was right b/c Obama nationalized the bank, auto, housing industry and healthcare pending.
here's my written apology young turks guy. I didn't vote for him cause i'm in texas, but I certainly rooted for him when everyone was comparing him to Bush. I did my share of arguing in his favor. But since he got elected as an independent he has disappointed many times. I think once we got to his supporting McCain over Obama, that's when I gave up on Joe for good.
if a certain election wasnt stolen in 2000 and a certain nobel prize winner won re-election in 2004 and his certain vp were to run and win a certain election in 2008....
you fucking removed your comments so i couldnt respond there for i won but since u let me comment on this i can say that just shows how much u lied caz u had to say i dont want people to read what i wrote and your comments r still removed so no1 can read them
u oviously fucking didnt win since u had to remove your comments and if people could read them u no they would agree with me caz there was no reason to remove them unless u lost and u could have just left it with me winning but now not only do i have first comment bout this show but i also have first normal comment caz your comment is byby
i wont shut up caz i no im right and its all bout the truth and its something u dont no how to tell so u blocked off all your comments and i like to type this way caz its easier saves charaters and i have trouble spelling and since i type fast sometimes my letters get switched around but that dosent matter what matters is your an idiot who had to block off all your comments and u think u win from doing that no u fucking lose that makes u a moronic troll at least i am persistant
i dont shut up caz i no im right and when im right i dont back down but by u backing down u just said that i was right and i no im right more then i did b4 caz u blocked all your comments and that is exactly the same thing as giving in and saying that u did lie eventho it was so ovious that u lied and since i didnt reply back to u how did u even no that i commented unless u where trying to do another trick like the republicans do
no i did it cause of your repetitive annoying comments saying the same thing over and over without evidence. You need evidense to prove something. You don't have it so I win.
i didnt say the same stuff over again i went off of your comments and answered to y u lied but now it dosent matter caz i have the first comment and the first comment of this show and the first comment longer then 1 word
you did say the same stuff over again after I already, "every1 knows the unwriten rule" "eryone knos the unwriteen rule" "everyone knows teh unrit4eniyi rulesoti5y45woi5jy45gol" like seriously you are like a broken record. You don't know how to prove your points and you say the same shit over and over after I have already proved it wrong. You are only first for having more than one word.
thats not what i said i also told u that i could prove u to be guilty if u took a lie ditector test and that it gose off of your brain and u where stupid and claimed it didnt but anyways u gave me 1st comment for everything so it dosent matter
not oppion fact caz all u said is first and that means that u meant first to comment and thats not an oppion that is also a fact or else u would have typed out more i mean sirously it dosent matter now u gave me the first spot by erasing all your comments so your the loser majorly caz once u delete the comment it dosent have what was said so it could easily be a reply to me there fore i win on every account
"not oppion fact caz all u said is first and that means that u meant first to comment "
no, opinion. Just because you THINK that meant first comment, doesn't mean it's true. I personally was talking about Lieberman. Can you prove otherwise? NO. You would have to go through my brain to do that.
"now u gave me the first spot by erasing all your comments" Nope, I still win. I deleted the comments because you won't accept that you are indeed wrong. You only win for having more than one word.
it isnt what i think its what i no and i no that u had to come back in here to c if i commented caz i couldnt reply to u since i didnt respond back to u and with the removing of your comments it shows that u knew u lied not that u wanted to stop this caz u r still commenting on me there for i win in several different ways
Wow you are not making sense whatsoever when you type your comments. Learn how to properly use English and then people can better communicate with you because you are not sounding very educated at all. You cannot properly organize your thoughts to back yourself up. This is the reason why people shouldn't do drugs. So anyway, come back with proof... and words that people can actually read..
i make sense u just cant read what i said was to figured out if i commented u had to come back into this room and look for my most resent comment since i didnt get to reply off your sn since your comment was removed so u didnt remove the comments to have me stop commenting or else u wouldnt have come back here and i won caz u removed the comments and didnt let it go and we both no u r as lier
no u didnt u deleted your comments and that was a forfit in your part and u said u didnt comment on me caz u didnt want to fight and that was a lie caz u came back into this room just to c if i commented and it shows that u lied bout that and u deff put the word first as in first comment
u think i type weird i can show u a comment thats weirder caz they type with numbers and letters
and when u delted your comments u forfited
u also lied bout y u delteted the comments
u said it was to stop from aruging with me but u had to come back in here to c if i commented a reply to u since i couldnt reply to any of your comments
and u lied bout that so oviously u lied bout your comment and u only typed first to show that u where the first person to comment on the vid
yes it dose if u watch =3 when it was capital hill gangster and it wasnt just the first i was talking bout i am saying for u delted your comments u oviously lied about that if u wanted to stop aruging u wouldnt have came back into this room and looked for my comment and then replyed on it just to keep this going and u wrote first only caz u where the first comment and since u lied bout 1 thing u oviously r a lier
it doesn't always mean testicles and can be a face cuz some people use it as that. Why would you put a pair of testicles at the end of your comment that's stupid
and obviously you are a slanderer because you have no proof against me
u dont understand the testical joke it means anime kitty face ray just made it mean testicals and im not slandering caz u said that u delted the comments to stop aruging with me but that was a lie caz u wouldnt have came back into this room just to c if i commented again and u wouldnt be commenting to me now if u wanted to stop aruging there for u r a lier and u also lied bout commenting on this vid when all u said is first and i new that even b4 your other lie
im not a slander u r a lier u lied bout y u removed the comments and u lied about commenting on this show when all u said was first now go suck =3 and leave me alone
I was talking about Lieberman being first not me, I never lied once and you can't prove otherwise so yes you are a slanderer, so *you* can go suck anime smiley faces and leave me alone, Japanophile.
yes i can by your own admision u said u deleted the comments to stop aruging with me but to even find out that i had commented to u u had to come back into this room and see if i created a new comment because i couldnt reply off of one of your sns caz u had all the comments removed there for u lied bout y u removed the comments and if u lied once u easily lied twice specailly since all u said was first and that means u where first to comment nothing else was meant by it
yeah because you still kept arguing after I had dropped it which shows your immaturity. Also I was talking about Lieberman being first not me, because you can't prove it you are a slanderer.
but for u to no that u would have to of come back in here to c if i commented again caz i couldnt reply off of your comments meaning u didnt want it to end or else u wouldnt have kept it going u act as if im going to let your lies win as if the truth should always win and u keep lieing and i wont stop until u stop lieing and finally admit that when u commented first u only meant u where the first to comment or else u wouldnt have came back in here and kept lieing to prove u r a lier
well you don't have proof so until then I am still telling the truth. that's part of being innocent until proven guilty. Sorry you might not have that in France but here in the US that's how it is. so i'm still first and I win because I was talking about Lieberman and you have no proof against it so I am still innocent.
yes i do u said u removed your comments caz u didnt want to aruge with me but to get back in here to even find out i commented to u u had to accually get into this room and look for my comments there fore u didnt want to stop aruguing and u lied bout that and u only meant first as in first to comment and that is my proof u stupid loser
"u had to actually get into this room and look for my comments there for you didn't want to stop arguing"
First of all, this isn't a room, it's a video.
Second, I came back to the video to see if you were still arguing after I already dropped it.
"and u only meant first as in first comment and that is my proof"
LMAO that is NOT proof you retard. proof is when you have the source as to why you believe something. If you believe I was lying you would have to have evidence, or it's not true.
what ever u would have to get into this video and if u really wanted to stop arguing u would have left it how it was and u didnt drop it caz u r still commenting and first did mean first comment caz u lied bout wanting to drop it u oviously lied bout first so u r a lier in at least 1 way
"if u really wanted to stop arguing u would have left it"
wrong, I would have deleted all my comments so you wouldn't reply, then hope that you *got the hint*, and then come back to see if you made a lie about me again, then I would have to disprove your comment because that is then called slander.
"u didnt drop it caz u r still commenting"
I *did* drop it, because I deleted all my comments, but then *you* started it again. that's your fault.
u delted all your comments caz u thought that would make u win when it made u lose caz it proved that u where lieing and if u didnt want to continue this then u wouldnt have replyed back to me but it shows that u r a lier caz u didnt want this to stop and maybe if u didnt reply back to me it would come up differently and i didnt start it up again caz i no what u r and that is a lier and its not slander when its the truth also lier is a word caz i spelt it like that and it feels weird to type ia
"u delted all your comments caz u thought that would make u win" No, it was because you keep saying the same thing over and over, without proof, so you already lost, you just wouldn't admit it.
"lier is a word", no it isn't. Now you're lying. You liar, AND slanderer!
i didnt lie u said u deleted the comments caz u wanted the arguement to end but it would have ended if u didnt come back into this vid and replyed to me there for u thought it would make u win if u deleted them and i didnt keep saying the same things over and over again i told u y i no u where lieing bout y u typed the word first and i didnt lose u lost caz u forfitted when u deleted your comments and i said that u r just a lier and never once said u 1 and u will never win caz the truth will win
if it gets typed out as lier enough it will be put into a dictionary and it is a word caz its typed out i never said it was a word in the dictionary tho but it is a word
"I never said it was a word in the dictionary tho but it is a word"
a word in the dictionary is the only true words, what you are doing is called misspelling, and not many people spell it "lier" so you're on your own on that one, because it will never be in the dictionary.
and well I'm telling the truth because you have yet to show actual proof, you are just saying what you believe without proof so I still win.
thats not true powned is a word and its not in the dictionary as far as i no i havent looked it up since it was made in a first person shooter game but fishes is now a word and it used to not be caz fish is supposed to be fish pural and it easily could be in the dictionary caz words that people said would never be in the dictionary r and its mostly based off of misspellings and u rnt telling the truth or else if u really wanted to stop this arguement u would have caz i wont give up
its still a word caz every1 uses it i mean fishes isnt supposed to be a word that is in the dictionary but it is and i think thats wrong i think if people want to have fishes be a word out side of the dictionary maybe in a slag dictionary fine but not in a normal dictionary so lier is a word just not a word in a dictionary
that doesn't make sense to compare the word fishes to lier, because fish is already in the dictionary and the plural form of the word is never in the dictionary because it's the same word. lier is a misspelling.
yes it dose caz if lier gets into the dictionary then it will be a word but to make it a ligit word people have to use it so im using it and the word fishes is also a misspelling and it shouldnt be in the dictionary caz the word fish is plural for fish fishes isnt a word but since people misspelt the word fish and kept typing fishes it got put in the dictionary lier will be in the dictionary if people use it a lot and i just looked its in dictionary com so it is a word in the dictionary u lose
dictionary com is not a valid source so *you* lose.
Real valid dictionaries come from the Universities that make them.
fishes is not a misspelling, fishes is correct when talking about fish of different species. you say fish when talking about one species. so yeah, you lose.
yes it is it has all the same words that a normal websters dictionary has and fishes is a misspelling that got put in the dictionary caz fish is the plurl of fish caz its like the word sheep sheep is purl for sheep so u lose u lieing cunt
no it isn't because dictionary com is known to have wrong words because they use their sources from dictionary companies rather than actual universities in which companies can have a high risk to make mistakes but universities don't because they make sure every word is correct. and it's not always true about fish because when talking about many species of fish you say fishes but when it's one species of fish you just say fish. learn biology and English you dumb ass lying cunt xD
thats y the words work in scrabble and r in other dictionarys as well and if people didnt keep typing fishes it wouldnt be in any dictionary caz that was orinigally a misspelling but later got put in the dictionary as a real word and your wrong u say there r many species of fish people just mistyped the word and evenutally it became a word just like the word lier and thats what u r
go look in past dictionarys they will say fish is pural y dont u go look in old dictionarys i accually read some of a 1935dictionary and thats more then i can say bout u after all u want people to think that u where talking bout the vid when u typed only the word first
it got changed do to misspellings tho so if u want a word in the dictionary either A a misspelled word or B a new word all u have to do is keep using it and either A others will use it or be others will pick up on it and then it will get into the dictionary thats y some words rnt in the dictionary that used to be in it now caz the words stopped being used but if u look in an older dictionary it will say that fish is pural and u where talking bout how u where first to comment in this here vid =3.
first of all, the first part of your comment makes no sense because it's a run-on sentence. You have some major issues with organizing your thoughts before saying something. and no, I was talking about how Lieberman being first, you need to have proof of me lying or you are slandering.
well i just wanted to use uup all the charaters hence the . after =3 and i just type what im thinking at the time and your a lier and i dont give a dam what u say and im not slandering u even addmited to being a lier when u came back into this vid just to keep agrueing with me now if u accually dropped it i might have been like dam they where sirious bout things but this just prooves u r like every other troller round now i have to use the rest of my comments to win a book caz i want the book =3
i never admited i was a liar, slanderer. I already told you why I came back. read my other comments, that's all I have to say. umm ok good for you, I don't care if you want a book...? wtf...
yes u did u said u removed the comments to stop aruging but if u really wanted to stop arguing u wouldnt have came back into this vid at all but u want to continue aruging so thats y u r a lier and when u lie about 1 thing u lose credabilty and it means u most likely lied b4 and oviously when u typed first u meant that u where the first 1 to comment in this comment section and im going to use my last remaining comments to try to win a book caz i want to win that book
i already told you why in my other comments so i don't need to say it again. you are saying the same things that i have already proven wrong, and also I meant Lieberman being first not me. and wtf are you talking about a book....
right and u admited in the other comments that u came back in here as tho u didnt want to stop the arugument caz if u really did want to stop it u would never have came back and the delting the comments was just so no1 could c how much of a lier u r and i want the book in the dark shadows vids thats y i havent been keeping up with my comments as much
i no y u did to stop aruging with me but look at this u came back in here to continue it so it dosent matter y u did all that matters is that u r a lier and i do have proof with the fact that u r still talking to me
i cam back because you found a way to slander again so i had to disprove it. and i'm not a liAr and that fact that i'm talking to you means nothing. You are slandering because you have no proof. and it's not lier.
well u failed at disproving it caz u delted your comments and came back caz u lied bout wanting to stop aruging or else u would have just left it caz no1 would have knew what these chats where bout and well u just wanted to continue this and u r a lier caz its ovious what first means when there r no other words
no I already told you why, go back to the other comments. I was talking about Lieberman being first, and no matter what, you will NEVER, EVER EVER EVER, have proof that I lied and was talking about my self. You would need to go in my brain to know for sure who I was talking about.
that doesn't proove i'm a liar it prooves you won't admit that you were wrong and you still have no proof. so i still when. how immature "i will get last comment" LOL what are you, 12?
yes it does caz u said that u wanted to aruging but that was a lie caz u dont want to stop and no i am not 12 i prob weigh as much as 1 tho but anyways u r a lier and i wont give up caz i no the truth and i wont let u get away with lieing after all belsiba will be mad at u
nah you are slandering because you have no proof. nice try though. and who the hell is belsiba? wtf. you never make sense. do you do drugs or something?
im not slandering its true u even said so yourself u removed the comments to stop aruging with me but your back in this room arguing with me there fore u like and belsiba is another name for satan and no i dont do drugs and i never will and i do make sense u just cant understand words after all u believe the pural for fish has always been fishes but when u look in a 1995 dictionary it says the pural for fish is fish
your wrong if u look in the older dictionarys u would c that the word fishes didnt exist that is a new thing do to misspellings and the word lier is put in the new dictionarys do to misspellings and i didnt slander u u r a lier and u will always be a lier
wrong it's because English needed a new way to talk about many species of fish, so they use "fishes". It is in basic Biology and it's learned in like 9th grade you say fish for many fish of one species, you say fishes for many species. read a biology book dumby. sorry but you will always be a slanderer =/
that isnt true the only reason that the word fishes got put into the dictionary was caz of misspellings it wasnt always in the dictionary as fishes it was in the dictionary as fish just go back into a 1995 dictionary and u will c that i am right and u r wrong u lier and i dont slander caz all u do is lie lie lie
it is true you need to learn biology dumb ass. I don't care what they said in 1995 today in scientific terms we say FISHES for many species and fish for one species so no you are not right you are wrong and you've been wrong thewhole time cuz all you do is slander slander slander
i dont need to learn biology it wasnt in biology books in 1995 caz fishes wasnt a word when fishes became a word they had to use it in books my science teacher even said that fishes is a misspelling that got put into the dictionary and thats y it is used in the books so u r a fucking idiot for not knowing that the true and oringal pural for fish is fish and it makes more sense to use the word fish in this kind of a sentance look at all those fish
who gives a shit when it became a word, it's a word now, They needed to use fishes to clarify if they were talking about many species of one species. you are the idiot and you are using projection. I KNOW the original plural for fish is fish you idiot, I'm saying that in SCIENCE terms you say fishes for more than one species.
right and the word lier will become a word if enough people use it its already a word in dictionary com so it most likely is else where i should check my websters dictionary and then i can say fuck u lier is a word and thats what u r and im not an idiot caz i want to use all my charaters typing in this instead of waisting it with dots and science didnt always use the word fishes and thats what i am also saying it became a word do to misspellings
lier is easier to spell and we didnt need the word fishes caz we have the word fish as pural and if u want everything to be pural then lets make the word sheeps a word but sheep is pural for sheep so saying sheeps doesnt make sense u moron and u r a lier and fishes did become a word do to misspellings all u have to do to prove that is look in the 1995 dictionary the word fishes isnt in it caz people didnt misspell on the internet like they do now im going to check my dictionary for the word lier
That doesn't make sense "lier is easier to spell". Excuses! It's using the same amount of letters!
It doesn't work for "sheep", because fish is the *only* exception to the rule of not adding "s" or "es", when talking about many species. Moron!
Fishes didn't become a word due to misspellings it became a word due to the exception of the rule of talking about multiple species, it's used *specifically* for science, not because of a misspelling.
your talking about excuses your comment was only first and then when i said first to comment about this vid u made up a lieing excuse trying to say your comment was bout this vid when it wasnt and yes fishes did become a word do to misspelling and i told u to look in a 1995 dictionary caz it the word fishes wouldnt be there its not my most resent dictionary and the newest dictionary i have says that fish is also pural and i think lier would make a great alternet spelling like the word qat
that is just your lieing excuse is that liberman thing and i can type better english then this but its called commenting i do what it takes to have less charaters so i have more room to prove u wrong and i bet u dont no what qat is without looking it up so dont tell me to use correct english most people type worse in the comment section by using things like gr8 to save charaters but u prob r to stupid to understand/read what gr8 is so i dont do that to u instead i just dont use puncuation
u really wherent talking bout lieberman and qat is to a word its the varient of the word cat go look it up in any dictionary i can even use that word in scrabble so u r then u rnt better at english then me caz if u where u would have known what qat was and i am a native to english to be exact im from mass and my flag was choisen out of randomness caz thats the type of person i am is random i was thinking bout not choosing a flag at all but then i thought it wouldnt have matter so i randomized it
qat is not a variant of the word CAT, it's a variant of the word KAT or KHAT, which is ARABIC for a type of plant. It's not even English, it's Arabic romanization. so no, it's not even an English word so that doesn't count. It's just alphabetized /romanized Arabic.
who cares what you can use on some random game.
and I do know what qat is, you are the one who said it was a vairant of CAT, LOL..
yes i no that i just spelled it with a c accidently caz im trying to use my comments to win a book and u fucking said it wasnt a word and it is in english dictionarys even scrabble dictionarys and u cant use random words in scrabble they have to be real words and kat is prnounced like cat there for i tenically wasnt wrong i did misspell tho caz im trying to type fast to win a book and the more time i spend typing to u the less likely i will win u lieing cunt
qat dose count caz its allowed in scrabble and so dose za and qi and if u dont like it well that just sucks for u and im not a slander for telling the truth and u r a lier and u will always be a lier
its not just a game its a game that uses the dictionary and an english dictionary and im not slandering u u r a lier u said first and u only meant it as first to comment and u also lied bout y u removed your comments caz if u really wanted to stop aruging with me u would just stop
it's still just a game and you are slandering me. u slanderrrr..... i was talking about lieberman, you have no proof otherwise. proof would be making a screenshot of me saying that I was talking about myself... i didn't lie about that it really was because you wouldn't shut up and admit you were wrong because you had no proof. but then you slandered me so you started it again, slanderer
i am not slandering u caz u r a lier after all u r still commenting i bet that people would have taken your side if u kept your comments delted and i might have to thats y i typed that to c if u where sirious bout stop aruging but u wherent u where just trying to be a bitch and make it so others couldnt c how much of a lier u r
u just cant read u r an idiot u dont even no what gr8 means i mean sirously its called commenting u do what u can to make it so u use as little charaters as possible u r also a lier and a moron
500 charaters isnt enough space all the time there r many times i continue what i am saying i have used all 500 charters on u many times and im not a slanderer u r just a fucking lier u lied bout y u wrote the word 1st when every1 knows that it was only caz u where the first 1 to comment and u lied bout y u removed the comments caz guess what u r still typeing to me and thats y u r a moron
That's what writing another comment is for, it just makes you look uneducated, and it butchers up your sentences.
"I was talking about Liberman and you have no proof against it."
"i didn't lie about that it really was because you wouldn't shut up and admit you were wrong because you had no proof. but then you slandered me so you started it again, slanderer"
I don't even have to say all that again, I just copied and pasted what I said. lol. slandererrrrrrrrrr
Cenk is right on! BOLD and ACCURATE to call Lieberman out as a "corporate whore." Nothing stings worse than the naked truth. Keep on bringing it, Cenk!
tennisgoil 8 months ago
@tennisgoil Why doesnt Cenk have some conservatives at rebel headquarters? Why doenst he ever have gop guests at headquarters?
calimar28 6 months ago
Why you hate Joe so much for "reaching across the isle", but you love McCain when he reaches across the isle? Is there some hypocrasy here Cenk?
calimar28 1 year ago
@calimar28 you're a moron.
griffinshaffer83 1 year ago
@griffinshaffer83 I am? Then dispute my facts! Dont just come here and call me a moron, back it up! Show me where I said something wrong!
calimar28 1 year ago
@calimar28 Cenk is nothing but a hypocrite and a puss. He would rather lie and talk shit and drag down the country than be real and talk about what's really going on. YA HEAR ME CENK. I would love to debate his punk ass.
weseyedwalk 1 year ago
@weseyedwalk Yeah me too, but you wont see that. Cenk doesnt like to debate anyone on the other side. He wants nothing to do with the teaparty in a debate, he would get ruined.
calimar28 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Viacom Inc, known for producing pornographic videos & violence-inducing gangsta rap on its MTV station, is owned by the Jewish billionaire, Sumner Redstone.
“Sumner” was actually born, “Murray Rothstein,” who resides in Newton MA.
LOGO Gay TV promotes anal sex between two males by using Biblical titles in its programming such as “Jacob & Joshua” and “Noah’s Arc.”
CBS is owned by Jews. Time-Warner is owned by Jews. ABC is owned by Jews.
MsPamAnn 1 year ago
I'm sick of people who are supporters of either the Democrat or Republican side. Only because Each side will throw propaganda at the opposite side's faces, making the president(s)/Senator(s) look like hitler or the antichrist. If they can't handle the decisions that political leaders make, WHY DON'T THEY RUN FOR PRESIDENT!?
mrbup 1 year ago
fuck the republicans and democrats, i say we make a 420 party lol.
420chronmasta 1 year ago
Liberals detest Lieberman and vice versa. This was not always the case, by the way.
NYerintransit 1 year ago
hes an independent.....are you saying he's still obligated to have blind party allegience to democrats even then??
ProRican09 2 years ago
Yes thats what Cenk is saying. Cenk is mad because the dems have only 59 votes, so they wont socializes us like they wanted to. And next November they will lose votes...
calimar28 2 years ago
Anyway, all this goverment public option is about, is to give free heatlhcare to negros. Thats what it REALLY is about.
No way.
calimar28 2 years ago
@calimar28 shoo troll...no ones going to give you the satisfaction of an emotional response to a comment that is obviously a troll attempt. If you want to troll properly you have to be at least a LITTLE subtle about it. So shoo...practise on some other forums first.
boorens18 1 year ago
@boorens18 Well, we Conservatives won BIG! Historic levels! Now you dems have lost power. You down guys liek Lieberman, just because he reaches across the isle.
calimar28 1 year ago
@calimar28
LOL You cry like a little bitch on your channel about name calling then you use words like "negros" thinking it is somehow not name calling. What a moron. You are a tool for the system, a troll on YouTube and a racist moron in life. In short your a dumb ass pig.
God = Jesus Christ = Sun (an actual ball of burning gas in space) = 1 Billion Christian Sun Worshiping Morons + 1 Dumb as Dirt calimar28 (a pathetic and ignorant pig)
mymojorisin 1 year ago
@mymojorisin Your a fool. You have a lot to learn. You know nothing about the spirital, you know nothing about politics...your a name caller, Useless.
calimar28 1 year ago
@mymojorisin How you gonna deal with the new GOP house? the teaparty? Your a joke. your libs are a joke. Your liberals are no longer welcome, we dont want communism, or the boy from Kenya running America as he will be defeated in 2012. You love the negro. Your a mongrel.
calimar28 1 year ago
It's funny that this is from 2 months ago, and it's from just about the time Lieberman was in favor of the Medicare Buy-In plan, and we were still bitching about how dumb Liebs is.
dEdGrimley 2 years ago
coolvideogamevideos dude - you're being played - there is NO difference in left/right. its a ruse and always as been - politics is only there to make you feel like you've got a say - you and i do not have a say - my incrediby wealthy freinds - do not. the sad fact is they are controlling us you and I and we are ...fucked, without drastic measures being taken. seek those measures and people.
berserkerkev 2 years ago
@Cool
ypour opinon is bias and filled with flaws, therefore, stay quiet
BalooDumptruck 2 years ago
Hey, we are anti-private industrial insurance greed and control. Why suddenly does Joe play anti-public and anti-govt out of blue so suddenly? We should all play anti-Semitic more often because of him.
beancube2008 2 years ago
this guy is nothing but 100% asshole
aeroliner750 2 years ago
Cenk, why dont you invite him to rebel headquarters? I would PAY to see that interview (cat fight). Rarrrw!
calimar28 2 years ago
Cenk, Im not sorry that Joe was re-elected. Of course, I'm a conservative...
LOLOL It's funny to see you libs in power, but you cant get anything done! If nto now, then when? Answer is NEVER! LOLOL!
calimar28 2 years ago
Leiberman: "I, uh, um, uh, don't think...think we're trying to do too, too much. I'm, um, uh, concerned, that, that, it's going to, to, um, cost, too much, so I think, we should, should, just wait, until, until the recession is over, so, I, I, oppose the public option".
Anyone want to guess how much Leiberman accepted in insurance company money these past two years? Half a million? A million? Nope. Leiberman sold us out for over a million dollars.
Thanks, Joe...... we'll remember it.
OrmEmber 2 years ago
Lieberman should ave been ot down 10 years ago. If Gore had a chance then he would have been our VP! People forget. And Don Imus? WTF? Rutgers should have lynched him. Very bad guys both of them. How could Joe go down to Florida and campaign for McCain?
eqsmooth 2 years ago
Its time to haul these corp. whores off the floor in handcuff. for misrepresentation of office
sjoberdix 2 years ago
The US is not and has never been a welfare state.
For at least half a century, however, it has been a warfare state.
mopsius 2 years ago
The economist John Williams actually makes a persuasive case that the US GDP growth has actually been NEGATIVE for quite some time.
mopsius 2 years ago
Global Warming--whether it is the case or not--is irrelevant.
Like McGovern, Gore is and was correct about the automobile for reasons that nothing to do with Global Warming or what causes it.
It is a known fact, on the other hand, that large scale modern warfare does cause rises in climatic temperature for many years afterward.
mopsius 2 years ago
The US is a predatory capitalist warfare sate.
No one can look at the last forty years objectively and come to any other conclusion.
It is now bankrupt and collapsing due to Bush and Cheney who put the finishing touches on the catastrophe.
Bon appetit, mes enfants.
mopsius 2 years ago
USD has collapsed.
US oil has to be nationalized and separated from USD as quickly as possible.
Without that there is no possiblilty of economic recovery.
mopsius 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Millions of people do not have health insurance in America. Many people go bankrupt because they don't have health insurance and tens of thousands die each year because they don't have health care.
Lieberman is a prostitute of the health insurance industry. Ironically, the majority in his own state wants the public option. Lieberman is a fucking asshole.
blackman4544 2 years ago
Trader Joe. He sucks.
blackman4544 2 years ago
No, you liberals suck blackman. You suck because you turn on your own when they do anything you disagree with. So you turned on Joe a few years back and he almost didnt get into the Senate. Now it is payback time. Now you are getting the hand you delt yourselves.
calimar28 2 years ago
Does begin democratic mean agreeing on every proposition that Obama sets forth? What happened to just thinking first?
robshaps 2 years ago
wow when did independents become pussies, i agree with tyt that the democrats are more of a independent party than a left wing party and democrats seriously have no balls. this country needs a left wing party so we can find true middle ground give me a hand full of politicans who are atheists, gay, legal pot, envoimental hardwingers and then we may see a drastic change in politics cause frankly the right has gone so far right that its wrong
Lightren 2 years ago
thank you very much for say that Lightren and you are 100% right on that issue . i can't agree more with you . very smart thinking !!!
unelmitchell 2 years ago
The US Right needs to be liquidated immediately, including Right Wing Demorats.
They are a small minority that is dangerous to the species, the planet, other Americans , and themselves.
Nothing personal about it--just exterminate them as quickly as possilee.
Debating and discussing with them is a waste of time.
You can't meet a lunatic half way, unless you too are a lunatic.
You will always lose.
mopsius 2 years ago
Yuou think I am condoning the republicans? You have another thing coming. Both sides have thouroughly wrecked this country. The only way forward is with a Ron Paul.
calimar28 2 years ago
Oh that's right, in this universe, Gore was not elected president, he went on to get the Nobel prize, and Joe Lieberman did not become president after Gore was assassinated.
Gore must be thanking his lucky stars.
mopsius 2 years ago
dude seriously put down the comics and get some fresh air
Lightren 2 years ago
If you say so, Lightren. You mean to say Gore's VP was not this same vicious, Neo-Con Zionist Joe Lieberman?
No?
That was a different Joe Lieberman?
Gore is lucky to be alive. And that is no comic book.
mopsius 2 years ago
Gore is a fraud. Global warming is a fraud.
calimar28 2 years ago
No its not, you are wrong.
Darrylizer1 2 years ago
Yes it is. The last 10 years the earth has cooled. Now Gore changed it from global warming to "climate change". Wow, didnt reveal that its just a fraud, did he?
Snow not on Kilimanjero. So what? In nature things change. What was a cave 100 years ago, might now be underwater, or eroded. Things change in nature. Global warming is a fraud to get the goverment to take over buisness. For fucks sake, are you liberals that stupid? I have to explain it?
calimar28 2 years ago
Well I'm afraid I'll listen to the scientists, most of which are not liberal or conservative or from the USA or care about our politics. Man is a part of nature, we have made an impact on our world, the science of global warming is not difficult and is in fact very logical and measurable. You'll care when the coasts are flooded, half of Florida is under water and the Mississippi becomes an inland sea as it was millions of years ago. BTW I'm not a liberal and not a democrat or republican.
Darrylizer1 2 years ago
Global warming isnt even happening, as the earth has COOLED in the last 10 years. That aside, every century and every decade the earth gets warm, then cold, then warm, etc. ITS PART OF NATURE FFS! The globe warms due to the sun and volcanos...94%. The other 6% is due to us. I dont want goverment redistrbuting the wealth from here, to the 3rd world nations because of 6%.
Wake up...its a damn power grab by the liberals, and Gore wont even debate it...because he is a fraud.
calimar28 2 years ago
No it hasn't, temperatures have not cooled. You're viewing this like a football game and not something that threatens us. Perhaps that 6% is enough to tip the scales towards global change that is going to be really difficult to deal with. We'll see.
Darrylizer1 2 years ago
Fair enough...6% is under our control and should be curbed. In the mean time I dont want to shut down the worlds largest coal mines (which produce half of our electric), and close off the oil derrecks in Texas. We have to have power...you try living without it. And "green tech" powering our cities is decades away. The goverment wants to control the power producers and that is what this is really about.
calimar28 2 years ago
You folks apparently haven't read President Joe Lieberman's eulogy of Al Gore, who was assassinated by an Iranian-Arab, making Joe President. and beginning the Third World War?
You haven't?
Oh.
Alternate history in some other universe I guess.
mopsius 2 years ago
His office number is 202 224 4041. Leave him a message. Tell him what you think. His voice is full though...suprisingly.
darkfirelights 2 years ago
who voice office lieberman's ?
Lightren 2 years ago
darkfirelights you are 100% right about lieberman's Messages are full. and that neon-con didn't erase them for a very good reason. he don't want to hear the American people. he is just moved by money and power. just like all the republicans !!! and i really hope that they don't have stupid people out there that will vote for him the next time he is up for election. if anyone from connecticut out there PLEASE DON'T VOTE FOR LIEBERMAN !!! he's distroying the american dream for everyone !!!
unelmitchell 2 years ago
You liberals turned on him 3 years ago and almost cost him re-election. This is payback time for Joe! I LOVE IT!
calimar28 2 years ago
Pretty sure he screwed us harder when he endorsed McCain. :)
darkfirelights 2 years ago
It's time to leave the party man....Vote Green Party
Republican4Nader 2 years ago
Can anyone explain to me what cuts they're planning on medicare? I know they're cutting financially, but what are they cutting in benefits?
MLadyAzzera 2 years ago
i dont think they r cutting medicare not at a time like this i think republicans want to but the dems wont let them
kazooga1234 2 years ago
When you cut it finacially you cut benefits. Many doctors and hospitals will opt out and decline it. Services will be cut is the result. They could also change who qualifies such as age and incomes.
Republicans do not want to cut anything. They do not have any bill. The dems are blaming republicans as usual as that is there tactic.
USAPatriot1966 2 years ago
Cenk I am so sorry I didnt help elect liberman but I am from Florida and we did fuck up when we couldnt get our votes right for Gore
ryan8247 2 years ago
bigtex501 2 years ago
Lieberman endorsed McCain because he knew Obama is socialist. He was right b/c Obama nationalized the bank, auto, housing industry and healthcare pending.
PragaSong 2 years ago
hey i need huzzah in my 19 poonani
jennbootz349 2 years ago
You are wrong in every way. check my profile.
I am an atheist.
I am a progressive democrat.
I have family of every creed & color.
But I am always skeptic of Jewish motives.
appatel 2 years ago
here's my written apology young turks guy. I didn't vote for him cause i'm in texas, but I certainly rooted for him when everyone was comparing him to Bush. I did my share of arguing in his favor. But since he got elected as an independent he has disappointed many times. I think once we got to his supporting McCain over Obama, that's when I gave up on Joe for good.
MisusingLiterally 2 years ago
you know....
if a certain election wasnt stolen in 2000 and a certain nobel prize winner won re-election in 2004 and his certain vp were to run and win a certain election in 2008....
president lieberman
curlyfry1106 2 years ago
christinawatkinson thx for saying i win and for giving me first comment all together now
kazooga1234 2 years ago
I didn't.. I won... you didn't have proof so I won..
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
you fucking removed your comments so i couldnt respond there for i won but since u let me comment on this i can say that just shows how much u lied caz u had to say i dont want people to read what i wrote and your comments r still removed so no1 can read them
kazooga1234 2 years ago
No it's because you won't shut up and accept the fact that I won. GET OVER IT. I won. I'm first. Stop being so obsessed with me, I won, get over it.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
u oviously fucking didnt win since u had to remove your comments and if people could read them u no they would agree with me caz there was no reason to remove them unless u lost and u could have just left it with me winning but now not only do i have first comment bout this show but i also have first normal comment caz your comment is byby
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no it's because you won't shut up. I still won, get over it. your whole comment doesn't make sense because you can't type proper English.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i wont shut up caz i no im right and its all bout the truth and its something u dont no how to tell so u blocked off all your comments and i like to type this way caz its easier saves charaters and i have trouble spelling and since i type fast sometimes my letters get switched around but that dosent matter what matters is your an idiot who had to block off all your comments and u think u win from doing that no u fucking lose that makes u a moronic troll at least i am persistant
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no it's because you won't shut up that's why i blocked the comments. the truth is you don't have proof so i still win.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i dont shut up caz i no im right and when im right i dont back down but by u backing down u just said that i was right and i no im right more then i did b4 caz u blocked all your comments and that is exactly the same thing as giving in and saying that u did lie eventho it was so ovious that u lied and since i didnt reply back to u how did u even no that i commented unless u where trying to do another trick like the republicans do
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no i did it cause of your repetitive annoying comments saying the same thing over and over without evidence. You need evidense to prove something. You don't have it so I win.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i didnt say the same stuff over again i went off of your comments and answered to y u lied but now it dosent matter caz i have the first comment and the first comment of this show and the first comment longer then 1 word
kazooga1234 2 years ago
you did say the same stuff over again after I already, "every1 knows the unwriten rule" "eryone knos the unwriteen rule" "everyone knows teh unrit4eniyi rulesoti5y45woi5jy45gol" like seriously you are like a broken record. You don't know how to prove your points and you say the same shit over and over after I have already proved it wrong. You are only first for having more than one word.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
thats not what i said i also told u that i could prove u to be guilty if u took a lie ditector test and that it gose off of your brain and u where stupid and claimed it didnt but anyways u gave me 1st comment for everything so it dosent matter
kazooga1234 2 years ago
"thats not what i said i also told u that i could prove u to be guilty if u took a lie ditector test"
ok, and that's YOUR opinion. good for you!
no, i never gave you first comment. I'm the first commenter, not you. You are a loser. Get over it.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
not oppion fact caz all u said is first and that means that u meant first to comment and thats not an oppion that is also a fact or else u would have typed out more i mean sirously it dosent matter now u gave me the first spot by erasing all your comments so your the loser majorly caz once u delete the comment it dosent have what was said so it could easily be a reply to me there fore i win on every account
kazooga1234 2 years ago
"not oppion fact caz all u said is first and that means that u meant first to comment "
no, opinion. Just because you THINK that meant first comment, doesn't mean it's true. I personally was talking about Lieberman. Can you prove otherwise? NO. You would have to go through my brain to do that.
"now u gave me the first spot by erasing all your comments" Nope, I still win. I deleted the comments because you won't accept that you are indeed wrong. You only win for having more than one word.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
it isnt what i think its what i no and i no that u had to come back in here to c if i commented caz i couldnt reply to u since i didnt respond back to u and with the removing of your comments it shows that u knew u lied not that u wanted to stop this caz u r still commenting on me there for i win in several different ways
kazooga1234 2 years ago
Wow you are not making sense whatsoever when you type your comments. Learn how to properly use English and then people can better communicate with you because you are not sounding very educated at all. You cannot properly organize your thoughts to back yourself up. This is the reason why people shouldn't do drugs. So anyway, come back with proof... and words that people can actually read..
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i make sense u just cant read what i said was to figured out if i commented u had to come back into this room and look for my most resent comment since i didnt get to reply off your sn since your comment was removed so u didnt remove the comments to have me stop commenting or else u wouldnt have come back here and i won caz u removed the comments and didnt let it go and we both no u r as lier
kazooga1234 2 years ago
sorry I don't speak broken English like you I only know the correct proper English. I won though btw
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
no u didnt u deleted your comments and that was a forfit in your part and u said u didnt comment on me caz u didnt want to fight and that was a lie caz u came back into this room just to c if i commented and it shows that u lied bout that and u deff put the word first as in first comment
kazooga1234 2 years ago
I don't understand you type too weird but anyway thanks glad I won since you have no proof yet
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
u think i type weird i can show u a comment thats weirder caz they type with numbers and letters
and when u delted your comments u forfited
u also lied bout y u delteted the comments
u said it was to stop from aruging with me but u had to come back in here to c if i commented a reply to u since i couldnt reply to any of your comments
and u lied bout that so oviously u lied bout your comment and u only typed first to show that u where the first person to comment on the vid
u r a lier
=3
kazooga1234 2 years ago
i never forfited you just won't stop saying the same thing without proof
i never lied about deleting the comments
it was to stop from arguing but then again you had to be a smartass and lie
and actually i was talkinga bout Lieberman being first not me, you have to prove that I did.
you're a slanderer
=3
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
theny did u say that u delted the comments to stop aruging with me but u keep commenting back so it shows that u lied
u had to come back into this room to find out if i even commented off of u and yet this continues u lier
i bet that u dont no what =3 means it means
=3 testicals
kazooga1234 2 years ago
well you are slandering because I already told you was talking about Lieberman. You have some sort of comprehending issues or slander issues.
and it doesn't have to mean testicles.
Why would you add a random "testicles" to your comment? that makes no sense. That's so stupid.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes it dose if u watch =3 when it was capital hill gangster and it wasnt just the first i was talking bout i am saying for u delted your comments u oviously lied about that if u wanted to stop aruging u wouldnt have came back into this room and looked for my comment and then replyed on it just to keep this going and u wrote first only caz u where the first comment and since u lied bout 1 thing u oviously r a lier
kazooga1234 2 years ago
it doesn't always mean testicles and can be a face cuz some people use it as that. Why would you put a pair of testicles at the end of your comment that's stupid
and obviously you are a slanderer because you have no proof against me
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
u dont understand the testical joke it means anime kitty face ray just made it mean testicals and im not slandering caz u said that u delted the comments to stop aruging with me but that was a lie caz u wouldnt have came back into this room just to c if i commented again and u wouldnt be commenting to me now if u wanted to stop aruging there for u r a lier and u also lied bout commenting on this vid when all u said is first and i new that even b4 your other lie
kazooga1234 2 years ago
wow so you're a weeaboo wapanese slanderer. nice
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
im not a slander u r a lier u lied bout y u removed the comments and u lied about commenting on this show when all u said was first now go suck =3 and leave me alone
kazooga1234 2 years ago
I was talking about Lieberman being first not me, I never lied once and you can't prove otherwise so yes you are a slanderer, so *you* can go suck anime smiley faces and leave me alone, Japanophile.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes i can by your own admision u said u deleted the comments to stop aruging with me but to even find out that i had commented to u u had to come back into this room and see if i created a new comment because i couldnt reply off of one of your sns caz u had all the comments removed there for u lied bout y u removed the comments and if u lied once u easily lied twice specailly since all u said was first and that means u where first to comment nothing else was meant by it
=3 testicals
kazooga1234 2 years ago
yeah because you still kept arguing after I had dropped it which shows your immaturity. Also I was talking about Lieberman being first not me, because you can't prove it you are a slanderer.
^_^ zomg Japanophile ftw lolz =3 gb24chan
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
but for u to no that u would have to of come back in here to c if i commented again caz i couldnt reply off of your comments meaning u didnt want it to end or else u wouldnt have kept it going u act as if im going to let your lies win as if the truth should always win and u keep lieing and i wont stop until u stop lieing and finally admit that when u commented first u only meant u where the first to comment or else u wouldnt have came back in here and kept lieing to prove u r a lier
kazooga1234 2 years ago
well you don't have proof so until then I am still telling the truth. that's part of being innocent until proven guilty. Sorry you might not have that in France but here in the US that's how it is. so i'm still first and I win because I was talking about Lieberman and you have no proof against it so I am still innocent.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes i do u said u removed your comments caz u didnt want to aruge with me but to get back in here to even find out i commented to u u had to accually get into this room and look for my comments there fore u didnt want to stop aruguing and u lied bout that and u only meant first as in first to comment and that is my proof u stupid loser
kazooga1234 2 years ago
"u had to actually get into this room and look for my comments there for you didn't want to stop arguing"
First of all, this isn't a room, it's a video.
Second, I came back to the video to see if you were still arguing after I already dropped it.
"and u only meant first as in first comment and that is my proof"
LMAO that is NOT proof you retard. proof is when you have the source as to why you believe something. If you believe I was lying you would have to have evidence, or it's not true.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
what ever u would have to get into this video and if u really wanted to stop arguing u would have left it how it was and u didnt drop it caz u r still commenting and first did mean first comment caz u lied bout wanting to drop it u oviously lied bout first so u r a lier in at least 1 way
kazooga1234 2 years ago
"if u really wanted to stop arguing u would have left it"
wrong, I would have deleted all my comments so you wouldn't reply, then hope that you *got the hint*, and then come back to see if you made a lie about me again, then I would have to disprove your comment because that is then called slander.
"u didnt drop it caz u r still commenting"
I *did* drop it, because I deleted all my comments, but then *you* started it again. that's your fault.
So I'm not a liar. lier is not a word. Slanderer.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
u delted all your comments caz u thought that would make u win when it made u lose caz it proved that u where lieing and if u didnt want to continue this then u wouldnt have replyed back to me but it shows that u r a lier caz u didnt want this to stop and maybe if u didnt reply back to me it would come up differently and i didnt start it up again caz i no what u r and that is a lier and its not slander when its the truth also lier is a word caz i spelt it like that and it feels weird to type ia
kazooga1234 2 years ago
"u delted all your comments caz u thought that would make u win" No, it was because you keep saying the same thing over and over, without proof, so you already lost, you just wouldn't admit it.
"lier is a word", no it isn't. Now you're lying. You liar, AND slanderer!
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i didnt lie u said u deleted the comments caz u wanted the arguement to end but it would have ended if u didnt come back into this vid and replyed to me there for u thought it would make u win if u deleted them and i didnt keep saying the same things over and over again i told u y i no u where lieing bout y u typed the word first and i didnt lose u lost caz u forfitted when u deleted your comments and i said that u r just a lier and never once said u 1 and u will never win caz the truth will win
kazooga1234 2 years ago
if it gets typed out as lier enough it will be put into a dictionary and it is a word caz its typed out i never said it was a word in the dictionary tho but it is a word
kazooga1234 2 years ago
"I never said it was a word in the dictionary tho but it is a word"
a word in the dictionary is the only true words, what you are doing is called misspelling, and not many people spell it "lier" so you're on your own on that one, because it will never be in the dictionary.
and well I'm telling the truth because you have yet to show actual proof, you are just saying what you believe without proof so I still win.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
thats not true powned is a word and its not in the dictionary as far as i no i havent looked it up since it was made in a first person shooter game but fishes is now a word and it used to not be caz fish is supposed to be fish pural and it easily could be in the dictionary caz words that people said would never be in the dictionary r and its mostly based off of misspellings and u rnt telling the truth or else if u really wanted to stop this arguement u would have caz i wont give up
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no powned is not a word it's a misspelling of owned.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
its still a word caz every1 uses it i mean fishes isnt supposed to be a word that is in the dictionary but it is and i think thats wrong i think if people want to have fishes be a word out side of the dictionary maybe in a slag dictionary fine but not in a normal dictionary so lier is a word just not a word in a dictionary
kazooga1234 2 years ago
lier is not a word it's a misspelling.
and fishes is only a word when it's a verb, as in "he fishes in the lake" not as in "there are many fishes in the lake".
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
that doesn't make sense to compare the word fishes to lier, because fish is already in the dictionary and the plural form of the word is never in the dictionary because it's the same word. lier is a misspelling.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes it dose caz if lier gets into the dictionary then it will be a word but to make it a ligit word people have to use it so im using it and the word fishes is also a misspelling and it shouldnt be in the dictionary caz the word fish is plural for fish fishes isnt a word but since people misspelt the word fish and kept typing fishes it got put in the dictionary lier will be in the dictionary if people use it a lot and i just looked its in dictionary com so it is a word in the dictionary u lose
kazooga1234 2 years ago
dictionary com is not a valid source so *you* lose.
Real valid dictionaries come from the Universities that make them.
fishes is not a misspelling, fishes is correct when talking about fish of different species. you say fish when talking about one species. so yeah, you lose.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes it is it has all the same words that a normal websters dictionary has and fishes is a misspelling that got put in the dictionary caz fish is the plurl of fish caz its like the word sheep sheep is purl for sheep so u lose u lieing cunt
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no it isn't because dictionary com is known to have wrong words because they use their sources from dictionary companies rather than actual universities in which companies can have a high risk to make mistakes but universities don't because they make sure every word is correct. and it's not always true about fish because when talking about many species of fish you say fishes but when it's one species of fish you just say fish. learn biology and English you dumb ass lying cunt xD
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
thats y the words work in scrabble and r in other dictionarys as well and if people didnt keep typing fishes it wouldnt be in any dictionary caz that was orinigally a misspelling but later got put in the dictionary as a real word and your wrong u say there r many species of fish people just mistyped the word and evenutally it became a word just like the word lier and thats what u r
kazooga1234 2 years ago
continue
go look in past dictionarys they will say fish is pural y dont u go look in old dictionarys i accually read some of a 1935dictionary and thats more then i can say bout u after all u want people to think that u where talking bout the vid when u typed only the word first
kazooga1234 2 years ago
in biology it is correct to say fishes when talking about many species of fish. and I was talking about Lieberman being first not me so so what
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
it got changed do to misspellings tho so if u want a word in the dictionary either A a misspelled word or B a new word all u have to do is keep using it and either A others will use it or be others will pick up on it and then it will get into the dictionary thats y some words rnt in the dictionary that used to be in it now caz the words stopped being used but if u look in an older dictionary it will say that fish is pural and u where talking bout how u where first to comment in this here vid =3.
kazooga1234 2 years ago
first of all, the first part of your comment makes no sense because it's a run-on sentence. You have some major issues with organizing your thoughts before saying something. and no, I was talking about how Lieberman being first, you need to have proof of me lying or you are slandering.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
well i just wanted to use uup all the charaters hence the . after =3 and i just type what im thinking at the time and your a lier and i dont give a dam what u say and im not slandering u even addmited to being a lier when u came back into this vid just to keep agrueing with me now if u accually dropped it i might have been like dam they where sirious bout things but this just prooves u r like every other troller round now i have to use the rest of my comments to win a book caz i want the book =3
kazooga1234 2 years ago
i never admited i was a liar, slanderer. I already told you why I came back. read my other comments, that's all I have to say. umm ok good for you, I don't care if you want a book...? wtf...
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes u did u said u removed the comments to stop aruging but if u really wanted to stop arguing u wouldnt have came back into this vid at all but u want to continue aruging so thats y u r a lier and when u lie about 1 thing u lose credabilty and it means u most likely lied b4 and oviously when u typed first u meant that u where the first 1 to comment in this comment section and im going to use my last remaining comments to try to win a book caz i want to win that book
kazooga1234 2 years ago
i already told you why in my other comments so i don't need to say it again. you are saying the same things that i have already proven wrong, and also I meant Lieberman being first not me. and wtf are you talking about a book....
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
right and u admited in the other comments that u came back in here as tho u didnt want to stop the arugument caz if u really did want to stop it u would never have came back and the delting the comments was just so no1 could c how much of a lier u r and i want the book in the dark shadows vids thats y i havent been keeping up with my comments as much
kazooga1234 2 years ago
i told you why i ideleted the comments, go look for that. it's not cuz of what you said. you are slandering because you have no proof
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i no y u did to stop aruging with me but look at this u came back in here to continue it so it dosent matter y u did all that matters is that u r a lier and i do have proof with the fact that u r still talking to me
kazooga1234 2 years ago
i cam back because you found a way to slander again so i had to disprove it. and i'm not a liAr and that fact that i'm talking to you means nothing. You are slandering because you have no proof. and it's not lier.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
well u failed at disproving it caz u delted your comments and came back caz u lied bout wanting to stop aruging or else u would have just left it caz no1 would have knew what these chats where bout and well u just wanted to continue this and u r a lier caz its ovious what first means when there r no other words
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no I already told you why, go back to the other comments. I was talking about Lieberman being first, and no matter what, you will NEVER, EVER EVER EVER, have proof that I lied and was talking about my self. You would need to go in my brain to know for sure who I was talking about.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
w/e i no u lied and i will get the last comment and i will end up winning caz u already tried to give up once and that will prove u r a lier
kazooga1234 2 years ago
that doesn't proove i'm a liar it prooves you won't admit that you were wrong and you still have no proof. so i still when. how immature "i will get last comment" LOL what are you, 12?
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes it does caz u said that u wanted to aruging but that was a lie caz u dont want to stop and no i am not 12 i prob weigh as much as 1 tho but anyways u r a lier and i wont give up caz i no the truth and i wont let u get away with lieing after all belsiba will be mad at u
kazooga1234 2 years ago
nah you are slandering because you have no proof. nice try though. and who the hell is belsiba? wtf. you never make sense. do you do drugs or something?
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
im not slandering its true u even said so yourself u removed the comments to stop aruging with me but your back in this room arguing with me there fore u like and belsiba is another name for satan and no i dont do drugs and i never will and i do make sense u just cant understand words after all u believe the pural for fish has always been fishes but when u look in a 1995 dictionary it says the pural for fish is fish
kazooga1234 2 years ago
I don't give a shit what Satan thinks because I don't belive in him.
and actually, if you have studied Biology and English, you would realize that the plural of fish (fish) is only used for ONE species.
"fishes" is only used for talking about MANY species.
so yeah you are slandering. I did remove the comments to stop arguing but then you started slandering me again.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
your wrong if u look in the older dictionarys u would c that the word fishes didnt exist that is a new thing do to misspellings and the word lier is put in the new dictionarys do to misspellings and i didnt slander u u r a lier and u will always be a lier
kazooga1234 2 years ago
wrong it's because English needed a new way to talk about many species of fish, so they use "fishes". It is in basic Biology and it's learned in like 9th grade you say fish for many fish of one species, you say fishes for many species. read a biology book dumby. sorry but you will always be a slanderer =/
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
that isnt true the only reason that the word fishes got put into the dictionary was caz of misspellings it wasnt always in the dictionary as fishes it was in the dictionary as fish just go back into a 1995 dictionary and u will c that i am right and u r wrong u lier and i dont slander caz all u do is lie lie lie
kazooga1234 2 years ago
it is true you need to learn biology dumb ass. I don't care what they said in 1995 today in scientific terms we say FISHES for many species and fish for one species so no you are not right you are wrong and you've been wrong thewhole time cuz all you do is slander slander slander
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i dont need to learn biology it wasnt in biology books in 1995 caz fishes wasnt a word when fishes became a word they had to use it in books my science teacher even said that fishes is a misspelling that got put into the dictionary and thats y it is used in the books so u r a fucking idiot for not knowing that the true and oringal pural for fish is fish and it makes more sense to use the word fish in this kind of a sentance look at all those fish
kazooga1234 2 years ago
who gives a shit when it became a word, it's a word now, They needed to use fishes to clarify if they were talking about many species of one species. you are the idiot and you are using projection. I KNOW the original plural for fish is fish you idiot, I'm saying that in SCIENCE terms you say fishes for more than one species.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
right and the word lier will become a word if enough people use it its already a word in dictionary com so it most likely is else where i should check my websters dictionary and then i can say fuck u lier is a word and thats what u r and im not an idiot caz i want to use all my charaters typing in this instead of waisting it with dots and science didnt always use the word fishes and thats what i am also saying it became a word do to misspellings
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no cuz we don't need "lier", we already have "liar".
We needed "fishes" because it names more than one species.
well guess what, it's not in Websters, so good luck finding it.
it didn't become a word due to misspellings, it became a word because science needed it to name many different species of fish.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
lier is easier to spell and we didnt need the word fishes caz we have the word fish as pural and if u want everything to be pural then lets make the word sheeps a word but sheep is pural for sheep so saying sheeps doesnt make sense u moron and u r a lier and fishes did become a word do to misspellings all u have to do to prove that is look in the 1995 dictionary the word fishes isnt in it caz people didnt misspell on the internet like they do now im going to check my dictionary for the word lier
kazooga1234 2 years ago
That doesn't make sense "lier is easier to spell". Excuses! It's using the same amount of letters!
It doesn't work for "sheep", because fish is the *only* exception to the rule of not adding "s" or "es", when talking about many species. Moron!
Fishes didn't become a word due to misspellings it became a word due to the exception of the rule of talking about multiple species, it's used *specifically* for science, not because of a misspelling.
1995? wow you're pretty far behind. lol
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
your talking about excuses your comment was only first and then when i said first to comment about this vid u made up a lieing excuse trying to say your comment was bout this vid when it wasnt and yes fishes did become a word do to misspelling and i told u to look in a 1995 dictionary caz it the word fishes wouldnt be there its not my most resent dictionary and the newest dictionary i have says that fish is also pural and i think lier would make a great alternet spelling like the word qat
kazooga1234 2 years ago
except that I was talking about Lieberman being first, not me. I never made an indication that I was talking about myself.
it didn't become a word due to misspelling, it became a word for Science's need to use "fishes" for multiple fish.
you shouldn't really be telling someone who's better than you at English what's correct English and what's not, it makes you look like a fool...
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
that is just your lieing excuse is that liberman thing and i can type better english then this but its called commenting i do what it takes to have less charaters so i have more room to prove u wrong and i bet u dont no what qat is without looking it up so dont tell me to use correct english most people type worse in the comment section by using things like gr8 to save charaters but u prob r to stupid to understand/read what gr8 is so i dont do that to u instead i just dont use puncuation
kazooga1234 2 years ago
no I really was talking about lieberman being first, not me. qat isn't a word in English, it is an Arabic word.
why would I not understand what gr8 is, when I'm a lot better than you at English? I'm the one who's native to English, not you, Frenchie.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
u really wherent talking bout lieberman and qat is to a word its the varient of the word cat go look it up in any dictionary i can even use that word in scrabble so u r then u rnt better at english then me caz if u where u would have known what qat was and i am a native to english to be exact im from mass and my flag was choisen out of randomness caz thats the type of person i am is random i was thinking bout not choosing a flag at all but then i thought it wouldnt have matter so i randomized it
kazooga1234 2 years ago
qat is not a variant of the word CAT, it's a variant of the word KAT or KHAT, which is ARABIC for a type of plant. It's not even English, it's Arabic romanization. so no, it's not even an English word so that doesn't count. It's just alphabetized /romanized Arabic.
who cares what you can use on some random game.
and I do know what qat is, you are the one who said it was a vairant of CAT, LOL..
using a fuckin Arab word... lol.. fail
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
yes i no that i just spelled it with a c accidently caz im trying to use my comments to win a book and u fucking said it wasnt a word and it is in english dictionarys even scrabble dictionarys and u cant use random words in scrabble they have to be real words and kat is prnounced like cat there for i tenically wasnt wrong i did misspell tho caz im trying to type fast to win a book and the more time i spend typing to u the less likely i will win u lieing cunt
kazooga1234 2 years ago
wtf are you talking about "a book"
qat doesn't count because it is Arabic romanization
"the more time i spend typing to u the less likely i will win" - that's not my problem. Lol
slandererrrrrrrr
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
qat dose count caz its allowed in scrabble and so dose za and qi and if u dont like it well that just sucks for u and im not a slander for telling the truth and u r a lier and u will always be a lier
kazooga1234 2 years ago
scrabble is just a game and if you don't like it that sucks for you.
qat is an Arabic word. instead of using Arabic text like this "قات" it is used in romanization as "qat".
you are a slanderer, you will always be a slanderer, slandererrrrr
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
its not just a game its a game that uses the dictionary and an english dictionary and im not slandering u u r a lier u said first and u only meant it as first to comment and u also lied bout y u removed your comments caz if u really wanted to stop aruging with me u would just stop
kazooga1234 2 years ago
it's still just a game and you are slandering me. u slanderrrr..... i was talking about lieberman, you have no proof otherwise. proof would be making a screenshot of me saying that I was talking about myself... i didn't lie about that it really was because you wouldn't shut up and admit you were wrong because you had no proof. but then you slandered me so you started it again, slanderer
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
i am not slandering u caz u r a lier after all u r still commenting i bet that people would have taken your side if u kept your comments delted and i might have to thats y i typed that to c if u where sirious bout stop aruging but u wherent u where just trying to be a bitch and make it so others couldnt c how much of a lier u r
kazooga1234 2 years ago
sorry your English is too butchered up... Slanderer...
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
u just cant read u r an idiot u dont even no what gr8 means i mean sirously its called commenting u do what u can to make it so u use as little charaters as possible u r also a lier and a moron
kazooga1234 2 years ago
You are the idiot, I already told you I knew what it means.
copied and pasted from my comment from earlier:
"why would I not understand what gr8 is, when I'm a lot better than you at English?"
so once again, you are wrong, ignorant, and slanderous. 500 characters is more than enough.
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago
500 charaters isnt enough space all the time there r many times i continue what i am saying i have used all 500 charters on u many times and im not a slanderer u r just a fucking lier u lied bout y u wrote the word 1st when every1 knows that it was only caz u where the first 1 to comment and u lied bout y u removed the comments caz guess what u r still typeing to me and thats y u r a moron
kazooga1234 2 years ago
That's what writing another comment is for, it just makes you look uneducated, and it butchers up your sentences.
"I was talking about Liberman and you have no proof against it."
"i didn't lie about that it really was because you wouldn't shut up and admit you were wrong because you had no proof. but then you slandered me so you started it again, slanderer"
I don't even have to say all that again, I just copied and pasted what I said. lol. slandererrrrrrrrrr
ChristinaWatkinson 2 years ago