The only reason its not on the market is because the GOVERNMENT CANT HAVE CONTROL OF IT AND THEY SURE CANT MAKE NO MONEY ON IT !! Thats why our GOVERNMENT SUCKS !!!!!!!!!
Could not be more WRONG! - MOST of it is used to generate electricity in China, India, the Middle East, Europe (recall Germany is shutting down ALL nuclear reactors?) North and South America. And let's look at Africa, Aswan Dam is a good hyro power plant but how many others compared to fossil fuel?
Like Japan is doing, I hope other countries follow suit: They are implementing (in the building code), that all future structures be built with solar power and/or other re-newable energy sources.
Solar, wind and geo-thermal energy are our future.
This is a scam, 100% and the guy is just trying to make money off you clicking on his link. See the "clickbank" in the link? Do not click on it, do not buy this garbage.
@mattymuck I know E=MC2, which means that Energy is the same as mass. Just because 1 type of energy is not out does not mean it can not be done. People controlling the oil racket that dont want other energy to come out. Come on boy, go read on Nikola Tesla, and you can find out why smaller investors are kept down while the people with money keep their wasteful, inefficient products on top. Why do you think you need a new laptop or phone every 2 year? Think about it....
@lslinger e=mc^2? are you kidding me? you're bring relativity into an argument about fuel sources? What is the fuel gonna do, move at the speed of light relative to the car? Obviously you have the scientific knowledge of a 15 year old. An uninformed view is not one worth speaking.
@mattymuck Hey red neck, e=mc2 means speed of light to people with lack of knowledge as your self so I will school your lil punk ass. E=MC2 also MEAN..... ENERGY = MASS..... Meaning energy is the same as mass, meaning you will find ENERGY in ANYTHING that has MASS!
@lslinger What did you do? go and read a wikipedia page? I already told you what it was, you didn't have to go and read it for yourself. So anyways how does energy having relativistic mass have anything even slightly relevant to the topic? I'm beginning to think you are a troll by the way, for your sake i hope you are.
@mattymuck The point is, water or anything with mass is energy. JUST people have not found a way to convert water to be used as fuel does not mean it cant be done. Your so stupid, go read your books your government feed your sheeple little mind.
@lslinger So i am done with this conversation.. You probably claim the government is hiding free energy from us to lol. It's so sad, you obviously have no credentials in physics or chemistry. Nor any other science, so stop talking like you are informed on the topic because you've read a few Wikipedia pages.
@mattymuck I have credentials in physics and plenty of research under my belt... They are with-holding "free energy" from us ever since the early 1900s... NIKOLA TESLA...do a little research and you'll see what is being suppressed.
@james3244 From what you have said and by looking at your profile, it looks as if you have a very limited knowledge of physics or chemistry. You seem to have a solid grasp on made up conspiracy theories though, good job.
@mattymuck Indeed that would be typical of a person with such an intellect. Perhaps you'd care to watch one of the videos and then make your decision; however, i'm sure you don't care.
Well I have my BA in architecture.. I'm not a physicist, nor do I endorse the claims of this video, but I sure as hell can separate truth from lies....and guess what... our world is based on lies.
@james3244 So let me get this right? You attack me for giving correct information, now only to say that you don't oppose what i said anymore? You also claimed that you were a physicist at first. Pretty sure you've lost any form of high ground here. You can't simply believe a conspiracy because you read something on the internet, Dr Tesla never claimed he could create free energy to say otherwise is an insult. Anyways if a secret is so important to be kept, maybe it is for the better.
@mattymuck haha um no. I NEVER claimed I was a physicist: "I have credentials in physics"..I do. I calculate loads every day.
I don't oppose what you say? what did you say? They ARE conspiracies!! That doesn't make them untrue!!!
Look up the definition of conspiracy.
Well, Tesla did in fact make that claim. He made it to his friends, the rockefellers, rothschilds, and the morgans...Once he told them we could substitute oil, they called him a lunatic, cut of funding and burnt down his office.
@james3244 Just because you do some classical physic calculations in no way gives you "credentials". You obviously have no deep knowledge of physical chemistry or physics, so you don't have much of a say on the matter of free energy. You simply have to trust the word of science or go spend years learning for yourself and make up your own mind. I don't completely deny conspiracies in the world, that would be ignorant. It is also ignorant to believe half of the conspiracy theories you can find ---
@mattymuck 99.99999999% doesn't know what Tesla, Einstein and Hawking know/knew.. EVEYONE will have to take their word for it. And yes, I actually study both physics and chemistry in my spare time. (some would call it sad, but i love to learn). I have have more than fundamental knowledge in physics, ESPECIALLY on the quantum level. It's AMAZING!!! Did you know we have teleported information through photons?? just incredible.
@james3244 If you actually go back and read my comments to which you are posting against you will see. How naive to consider only three people, you do realise there are many many other physicists right? Just because they are not famous, you think they are inferior? You think Hawking worked alone in the work that made him famous? I actually saw an article on quantum computing on google news,giving people information they can not comprehend is not a good idea in my opinion,only leads to conspiracy
@james3244 --- on the internet. Theres just simply too many of them out there written by lunatics and trolls alike. If it is impossible to prove a conspiracy, then thats all it can ever be... a conspiracy.
@mattymuck I agree with that, but what you don't know is that I do extensive research.. I didn't spend 4 years of school studying and researching new materials and methods for nothing. I know how to research.
Some consp. are just absurd, such as the new "Roswell explanation".. wow, what a joke that is.. even more of a conspiracy than aliens!!! haha
I understand where you are coming from considering how many idiots are on youtube.
You, however, have ran in to someone with intelligence.
@james3244 Also out of curiosity, if you think you have such an "intellect". Why become an architect? Doesn't seem all that suitable for a logical mind to me. Do you mean you spent 4 years in high school studying chemistry and physics?
@james3244 Wasn't insulting you, when I say logical mind I refer to one that would excel in theoretical physics. Not going to get into an argument over how smart you think you are, I think you and I both realise how pointless that would be. Showering someone in conspiracy talk is not a smart way to start a conversation anyways... As I originally stated you don't have the right the claim free energy is being kept hidden.
@james3244 I'd sooner believe the governments are hiding spacecraft technology in order to fake an invasion, than an advanced alien race being among us. And you can't cite youtube as a source in any way...
@mattymuck To be honest, I never was interested in theoretical physics until Uni.. My source isn't youtube, it's John Callahan of the FAA(now retired).
And perhaps they are government vehicles!!! But that would mean they had discovered a technology that defies gravity and won't affect a person when 50 gs are applied.
The UFO phenomenon is real.. The question is, "who is behind it?"...and what technology can possible pull these impossible manoeuvres that conventional aircraft couldn't dream of?
@james3244 Well even without going into this UFO matter, I still doubt it but i'm not denying it. It doesn't bother me to be honest, maybe things should be kept secret for a greater good lol. In any case I think there is a greater chance of my keyboard leaping of the desk than aliens on earth, how amazing it would be though haha.
@mattymuck Indeed it would be amazing and more and more evidence is pointing to... they have been here a while.
We are alien to some other civilization. When there is billions and billions of stars in our galaxy alone, each one with the chance of planets with life orbiting around them.
When you add the fact that there are millions and millions of galaxies THAT WE KNOW OF, the chance of life somewhere else just increased exponentially.
Never-mind we have only been around 10 000+ years..
@james3244 I have no doubt that there is life elsewhere, but complex life seems more unlikely and advance civilisations even more so. Put that together with traveling between galaxies which could be viewed as almost impossible. But yes maybe who knows. Ever thought about relativity in the case of aliens being able to travel at near light speed? lol our time would be insignificant.
@james3244 hence making our time even more insignificant lol. Although civilisations could destroy themselves or be destroyed naturally before becoming so advanced. Personally I find the idea of a civilisation destroying itself entirely hard to believe.
@mattymuck It would definitely be hard to completely wipe out a civiliZation all by themselves. You are correct in the fact that if we were able to travel the speed of light, the person inside the craft would essentially be ageless.
I am more worried about natural disasters causing nuclear meltdowns than being destroyed by Iran, Russia, or China..
However, China's gonna want their money someday ;)
@james3244 hehe what a variety of topics. Nuclear power is statistically quite safe. on the view of a civilisation though, I assume there would always be some survivors of a nuclear war. You would need to destroy the Earth somehow lol and by the time destroying planets was possible you would think other planets would have been colonised.
@mattymuck Nuclear power statistically IS quite safe.. but look at Chernobyl and Fukushima. Japan plans for these things and are actually one of the best protected against natural disasters..But that doesn't stop a 9.0 earthquake and a tsunami travelling at 500MPH.. We are seeing the radiation effects all the way over here in North America.. People still can't go back to Chernobyl!!
If the "New Madrid" fault were to go, there would be a few nuclear stations that would be affected.
@james3244 Meh, I don't see it as being catastrophic in a long term view. Any form of energy production can have its dangers. Apparently Hydro power was one that has the most common dangers if I remember right. I think Australia will end up building some nuclear plants, unless they decide to use more and more coal I don't see that going down well. I look forward to seeing what happens in the next 20 years or so lol. I am off, Good talk :) discussing our disagreements is the only way we learn ^^
@mattymuck and before you get at me with same lame grammatical error, I speak and write 4 other languages so small mistakes are prone to happen. Just because your government or the MAINSTREAM science society does not want you to believe something does not make it impossible.
Now get a life, im done with this conversation. If you want to check out other sources (than your mainstream source) then your welcome to.
@lslinger for starters I said relativistic mass, obviously you have no knowledge of the theory of relativity. E=mc^2 generally refers to the change in mass depending on the relative frame of motion. Furthermore the original point was on fuels. Yes all matter is energy, so? Water is in its most stable state it can not be oxidised further, hence it is not a FUEL. You can't get ny additional energy from it. You are talking about annihilating matter, so you gonna go make up some anti matter are you?
This video's title contradicts itself. HHO/gas hybreds use both HHO and gas. "NO GAS" implies it runs exclusively on HHO, without any gasoline whatsoever!
Why not develop it in another country? You know that your country is corrupt, owned by the oil companys, you wont get it through here, so why not go to Europe, sell your engine there, they are not as bought by the oil companys as in USA, like in my country sweden, they have never heard of this waterdriven engine, but they would take it on with open arms if you just told them about it, fuck who gets credit, aslong as we rid the world of gasoline driven cars!
IF HUMANITY DOES NOT SHAPE UP , WHEN THE OIL IS FINISHED THET WILL START CHARGING YOU FOR WATER WICH WILL COME HAS A GLOBAL WARMING TAX OR MORE , TRUST ME, WATER CARS ARE POSSIBLE BUT THEY WILL KILL YOU .NOT UNTILL THEY FINISH THE OIL ,THEY ALREADY STARTED THE CARBON TAX FOR THIS REASON ,TO REPARE YOU FOR THE WATER TAX,
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
You can use a bycycle to power a car, you can use water to power a car, same with steam, same with metan, solar power... and so on. Of course, we don't do it because the private companies lose money and the government supports them. I am guessing that without that leash we would be in the space era now.
@Bidmartinlo shut the fuck up, dude. what have you done? if it's possible then why dont YOU DO IT! it's not like you don't have the power to do it! but you sit on your fucking ass blaming "the man"
@elijahlucian It's been done, but theres more profit in oil and gass. I'm just suggesting that it's simple to get free energy. And technology is my life. ;(
Phisics have prooved this theory bullshit for over 50 years through the simple rule energy in = energy out, electrical energy in is grater than or equal to the energy contained in the hydrogen and oxygen. then minus the cell's efficiency of 60% and the alternators efficiency of 50% and there you go;.simply a scam
@snowman3514 realy....beliv it or not they made ...blah blah blah JUST...think about todays existing fuel cell chevy's equinox & honda's FCX clarity that just shows somthing
they combine hydrogen/oxygen in a cell to create electricity. the complete opposite process that is been descrbed throughout this video. they are creating the hydrogen, oxygen through other means such as solar ect.. not running down your battery and recharging it through the alternator (as described in this video) i really cant be bothered explaining the phisics to you, plenty of sites/books explaining it. look yourself
And of coarse the oil companies are gonna go kill that guy like they did in the past with other inventors....When will people wake up? We need to change our cavemen attitudes towards oil. We have to do this for our planet, our health and our wallets, and we have to do this FAST!
YES! very good attiude! but this unfortunatly is not the solution. solar/wind/geothermal/tidal are the future not a bogus system like this designed purely for fraud.
Oh Ya sure lets all use the only source of human survival (water) just so we can go, joy riding,, I rather put my cash on Free energy.! Rather then end up like mars did.
Because there are non, i fell for this hoax like other thousands, after two weeks of reaserch and having installed a 3ltr per min hho reactor i have no improvement in mileage or performance.
Im only thkfull because i didnt buy any instruction from fraudulent sites...
Now,i have learned over 15 reasons why it will not work. I will only mention 2 for lack of space.
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
see also free global energy on YouTube...it has numerous details of people that have made magnetic engines that never need energy to run and about the inventor that built a buggy that ran on water only as a fuel source
oil companies won't allow it cause if car manufacturers happened to make cars that ran on water/fuel then the oil companies would lose money...oil lobbyists are constantly pushing for this REAL technology not to become common...numerous people have been murdered because they have invented oil free running engines...google water powered buggy or look it up on YouTube and you'll begin to understand what I mean
@bigrboy7 shit u r really an idiot. some nations depend on oil. and water powered car is a great idea if mixed with gasoline but alone NO. where would the energy needed to split the molecules of water come from? and pls dont say the alternator, that just puts a drag on the car.
Instead of using inefficient high pressure storage of H, we could develop nano matrices to contain the H+ and H- ionic plasma, like computer memory cells.
Even though H is very abundant, free H is rare on this planet because H is always captive, bounded to other elements. The nano-matrices that allows efficient energy level transition would be the replacement means of captivity of H ions.
In a way, gasoline is a form of battery which takes millions of years to charge. Gasoline energy density is ~50 - 100 X that of the current best batteries. But gasoline combustion at best gives us 20% efficiency.
H2O > H2 + O reversibility provides high energy density as a battery, If someone can reduce the conversion waste.
Regen breaking wastes 60% of kinetic energy.
Success of elec car hinges on success in reducing energy conversion waste in high density H2O reversible energy storage.
HHmm.. Ever heard of the Parametric Resonance Effect--> Breaking the covalent bond without the archaic methods I'm sure you're defending..
Imagine Bunsen that a hundred years have passed and mankind is capable of traversing simple physical boundaries.
The Covalent Bond (Electromagnetic Force) is feebly bide and requires not the "Archaic" e- Bombardment Method- ie.the use of Amperage.. more, the exploitation of the EM Force, which is not the consumption of ENERGY.. but does work....mmmmm
Water injection has been around for a long time. It does a lot of things, but producing cleaner emissions is not one of them. That much water would cool the combustion chamber enough to create more NOx in a day than most modern cars make in their lifetimes.
Good day to all of my fellow Christians, firstly my apology for being out of topic. I came here to remind you people that the judgment day has started already. Please depart from cursing, smoking, violent entertainment, fornication, occultism, and for watching pornography etc. lest you be found not worthy to enter the kingdom of God in the Day of Execution. Thank you for your kind consideration.
looks like what they are talking about is water injection. or steam power.
you burn normal gasoline vapor, yet you squirt in water as it combusts, the water evaporates and expands, generating force to move the piston.
problem is, it generates less power than a normal gasoline explosion in the chamber.
if you really want to save fuel, buy an economic car and not an suv. use public transportation and a bike, instead of driving those 2km to a friends house.
Ever heard of the first law of thermodynamics? When water is broken up into hydrogen and oxygen, it takes a certain amount of energy. When hydrogen is burned (i.e. reacted with oxygen) it produces the exact same amount of energy and turns back into water. No net energy is produced. You would need something to produce the energy to break the water up in the first place *cough* oil/gasoline *cough*
HHmm.. Ever heard of the Parametric Resonance Effect--> Breaking the covalent bond without the archaic methods I'm sure you're defending..
Imagine 77 that a hundred years have passed and mankind is capable of traversing simple physical boundaries.
The Covalent Bond (Electromagnetic Force) is feebly bide and requires not the "Archaic" e- Bombardment Method- ie.the use of Amperage.. more, the exploitation of the EM Force, which is not the consumption of ENERGY.. but does work....mmmmm
Well, actually no, I've never heard of that in my life. Care to explain it? Or are you too busy being self-satisfied? Do you have a source website that can explain it?
@JustSomeGuy77 well then theres several ways to use water in combustion engines, the most blabberd about is to use hydrogen gas to then use for extra power etc etc, there is however anbother far more used in big industrial and ship engines, allthough theyre diesel not gas and opperates on slightly different ways, the water is injected to control the humidety of the air, since it prevents uncontrollable temprerature peaks that is to high to be used and smoothes out the combustion, hope it helps
NO Brains here please, if this were right the universe would have been limited and Aliens would have come on bullock carts, Please Get out of your shells and your crammy shells!
Lets just say there's no such things as 'free' energy! Unless you're prepared to pedal the car yourself, stick a house sized solar panel to your car roof or strap a massive wind power generator to the front of it or all three.
how do you know that? dont tell my the law of thermodynamics, i already know it.
what, in YOUR experience has made you conclude that this is not possible? NOT your opinion based on what you have read, your EXPERIENCE/EXPERIMENTS etc??
why do people automatically assume that when people look for alternative energies that they are trying to break the laws of thermodynamics?
all people are trying to do is get energy from places other than coal and oil. solar works, wind works, why dont you guys rag on them? do you think those are the only two possible alternatives in the entire universe?
chopping wood to heat your home is FREE ENERGY, this is the same thing that people are looking for here.
chopping wood isnt free energy? do you live in a communist country or something? last time i checked it was free to chop down a tree on your property and burn it.
OOOO, you think that when we say "free energy" you ASSume that we mean magically create energy out of thin air....
i wish you guys would understand what is trying to be accomplished here. open your eyes. FREE means something we dont have to pay the electric company for, not break some law of physics.
what is not possible? splitting water through electrolysis and recombining it again through fire? ive done it myself, it is possible. it isnt over-unity, but it is possible.
so we agree, then why did we even have this conversation?
sometimes, i have found, that there are energy inputs into a device that are not necessarily known by the inventor. this is were APPARENT over-unity comes from. this is how equations can be confused. they only add A+B inputs and get ABC output, and assume that C is over-unity. they simply failed to find C on the input.
No, it isn't *LOL* - The sun delivers the energy via the sunlight which is then bound chemically in the wood ( it has the potential for burning and releasing this stored energy as heat).
The only free thing about it is, that you don't have to spend other fossils fuels to produce it - unlike the "free" hydrogen in this case !. So essentially the sun does the work for us.
And there is btw. only a limited amount of wood as well.
wonder about this?... electrons in a ciruit are lighter than heavy protons, so they start moving when a switch is turned on.
but if you turn the switch off before the protons start moving, they have no place to go, so they stay where they were and the electrons are trapped in the load side the charge retains itself.
This is the idea behind a pulsed circuit.
And what does it mean for the laws of thermodynamics when they are broken all the time in quantuum physics?
but if you plant 20 seeds per tree you cut down, it is unlimited.
linear thinking hasnt gotten us anywhere, we need more dynamic thought processes and plans. many of those trees can mature within 20 years or less, very easy to self sustain FREE energy.
if i own my own oil well and use it, it is FREE energy.
Because of the crazy postulates they make about "free energy" and "water powered cars" etc., which is total nonsense.
As for wood, coal, oil and gas it's a whole different game, since it's essentially stored energy from the sun via biological processes and later heat + very hig pressure from the Earth. So the Sun (and the Earth) has done the work for us in those cases !
The same principle goes for uranium, but in that case the energy (bound in an unstable mass of atomic core particles ) comes from the universe (Supernovae) - or indirectly via other radioactive elements ( in the case of plutonium ).
Why use water when it's more needed for life than gas veg or other powers? or is saltwater useable? I'm sorry, I've not listened to this or read far enough down the comment sheet to see if I'm immediately proved wrong; but look at OZ and Africa for the importance of drinkable water as the true oil of our world... ...man...
Funny, but a total hoax. Water is not a fuel, every monkey knows that.
Also, manmade global warming is a hoax. If the story of manmade global warming was convincing enough on its own, why would they lie about so many things? South pole: growing. Polar bears: population growing. Connection between global temperatures and CO2: not proven, just claimed. Also, global temperatures have varied for all eternity, so why shouldn't they now?
Dude. "WATER"! It's in the god damn title! Not hydrogen and oxygen, but WATER! You can burn hydrogen, but you first need to produce it. You can't produce hydrogen, then burn it, and hope to get a positive outcome. It literally defies the laws of physics, which has never been done, and will never be done.
You, sir, are an utter and complete moron. I've done research on hydrogen fuel cells, and you? I know what I'm talking about. You, obviously, don't.
Well.. now that I have your attention, they are not claiming to defy the laws... they are utilizing the alternator to serve as a catalyst for ignition, bringing about a more wholesome efficient system...
hydrogen fuel cells are a wasted research endeavor because its so much harder to store compressed hydrogen and just as heavy.
So, Store it in water and hey you even get an oxy boost.
or just say fuckit and legalize the Hemp industry and get our gas that way... I agree thou GW = Hoax
They are claiming to be able to run them on water. "Steve's process modifies tap water into a powerful fuel" AKA hydrogen, which cannot be produced, then consumed with a positive outcome.
Also, I'm not sure how you're going to use tap water as a catalyst for a combustion. Water doesn't burn.
Hydrogen can also be stored in metalhydrides, which create bonds with the hydrogen. Don't know everything about them, but some of them actually store hydrogen denser than in its liquid form.
Storing hydrogen in water would result in an acid. Breaking this bond would require additional energy. Also, you can't remove the oxygen in water. It'd be the same as hydrogen production, which costs energy.
Legalising the hemp industry would also be good, I guess. I don't know if the world can produce enough fuel from farm land alone, though. Especially since farm land is also used for the production of food.
hemp is easily grown.. we produce a large amount of food ... most is grown to feed farm animals. Algae can also produce hydrocarbons. hey try this for higher MPG: Ice infront of the air intake.
I've got the notion that a hybrid utilizes more than 2 sources of energy. hydrogen is stored as a covalent bond with oxygen. -- electrolysis of water can be perfected and the resulting hydrogen AND OXyGEN will allow a more complete burn in a piston.
The law of the conservation of energy directly contradicts that. What you're trying to do is convert water to hydrogen and oxygen, then back to water, and you hope to gain energy with that. It is, quite literally, impossible.
plus have you ever combusted something in 100% oxygen? it is a much more energetic reaction... how do you think a regular car would perform in 100% oxygen atmosphere?
Don't you uderstand the importance of oxygen in an explosion?
Oxygen is a necessity for combustion. It just seems inefficient to produce it, if you can get it from the air.
I guess fuel would burn well in a 100% oxygen environment, but I still don't know if the boost gained from the added oxygen is enough to make up for the energy used in the production.
so there is an element of unknown with what they are pursuing...
I can infer that an increase of MPG would be evidence of the engine making up for the energy used in production of HHO. I've got some stainless-steel wire ... I'm going to try it. -- I'll have some videos posted.. check up on my progress.
I might try cooling the air infront of my air intake.. I heard that does exceptionally well.
Also, the process of electrolysis may very well come near perfection (but since nothing man makes is perfect, energy will still be lost), but the reaction in a hydrogen fuel cell can't. The maximum theoretical energy efficiency (theoretical, so the actual efficiency will be lower) is 80%. The rest will be converted into heat.
A car that runs on water is impossible, also according to the law of the conservation of energy.
Okay, that might be possible. Sorry, I was confused by the title (which seems to be wrong). Water alone will not power a car though, and I'm glad we agree on that.
These people are disgusting scammers, preying on the poor, no less. $600 would be peanuts if you could reduce fuel consumption by 70%, so clearly they are trying to make a quick buck off the poor.
You cannot extract energy in this way.
THINK, people. Wouldn't the oil companies have bought all this up and started selling hydrogen? Most people here have the intelligence of a monkey (though at least monkies don't get scammed)
Guys it is never going to happen, no one cares, all we want is money, everyone needs money, you know like what Optimus Prime said in Transformers, i think he said they are a earlier speacies or something like that lol, tha is what we all are, all of us are stupid. LOL!! We need this technology now, not later, what is aliens take over the world
It's not about that - it simply just doesn't work ;-) At least not in the sense they claim here and elsewhere - only if you use it as a way of making use of otherwise wasted energy -storing (some of)it as hydrogren - in the very ineff. ICE's - esp. the large US ones.
( type 3 l,V8 etc. A complete waste)
You could easily achive 50-100 % more if you didn't insist on those vastly over powered engines that sits in many US cars, which are often unnesc. big and heavy as well btw.
This set of plans is free on the net. google "hytronics". Don't buy them like I did. The only reason to buy plans is tech support and there is none through these guys. Questions disappear into the void never to be seen again.
ok and for the record hydrogen kits dont work for them to work you have to have the kit triple sized and thats bigger than most trunks and so much for having a pickup mr.t at uti
28 MPG!! fuck that terrable!!! what do you guy in the US drive tanks?!
sasop117 1 month ago
The only reason its not on the market is because the GOVERNMENT CANT HAVE CONTROL OF IT AND THEY SURE CANT MAKE NO MONEY ON IT !! Thats why our GOVERNMENT SUCKS !!!!!!!!!
johnh887 5 months ago
Very cool
To see more innovative videos like this or want to share your own ideas visit ThinkStageDOTcom
ThinkStage 5 months ago
"....and most of it is used for transportation."
Could not be more WRONG! - MOST of it is used to generate electricity in China, India, the Middle East, Europe (recall Germany is shutting down ALL nuclear reactors?) North and South America. And let's look at Africa, Aswan Dam is a good hyro power plant but how many others compared to fossil fuel?
DrMotorDude 7 months ago
Agreed, good discussion!!
Like Japan is doing, I hope other countries follow suit: They are implementing (in the building code), that all future structures be built with solar power and/or other re-newable energy sources.
Solar, wind and geo-thermal energy are our future.
james3244 8 months ago
****worm holes... fuijkrngjksgndfkms haha
james3244 8 months ago
This is a scam, 100% and the guy is just trying to make money off you clicking on his link. See the "clickbank" in the link? Do not click on it, do not buy this garbage.
proaudiohd 8 months ago
I dont get it. If someone knows how to build these cars that run on water why does he not build 1 or 2 every month and sell them on ebay?
Start from the grass root up....! Hit me up... im into IM (internet marketing)
CheapestGasEl 8 months ago
@CheapestGasEl Because water is not a fuel, simple as that.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck Shut up you! What do you know about what can be used for fuel and what cant. Dmm red neck.
lslinger 8 months ago
@lslinger Quite a lot actually, what do you know?
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck I know E=MC2, which means that Energy is the same as mass. Just because 1 type of energy is not out does not mean it can not be done. People controlling the oil racket that dont want other energy to come out. Come on boy, go read on Nikola Tesla, and you can find out why smaller investors are kept down while the people with money keep their wasteful, inefficient products on top. Why do you think you need a new laptop or phone every 2 year? Think about it....
lslinger 8 months ago
@lslinger e=mc^2? are you kidding me? you're bring relativity into an argument about fuel sources? What is the fuel gonna do, move at the speed of light relative to the car? Obviously you have the scientific knowledge of a 15 year old. An uninformed view is not one worth speaking.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck Hey red neck, e=mc2 means speed of light to people with lack of knowledge as your self so I will school your lil punk ass. E=MC2 also MEAN..... ENERGY = MASS..... Meaning energy is the same as mass, meaning you will find ENERGY in ANYTHING that has MASS!
School'd and Check mated. Now king me!
lslinger 8 months ago
@lslinger What did you do? go and read a wikipedia page? I already told you what it was, you didn't have to go and read it for yourself. So anyways how does energy having relativistic mass have anything even slightly relevant to the topic? I'm beginning to think you are a troll by the way, for your sake i hope you are.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck The point is, water or anything with mass is energy. JUST people have not found a way to convert water to be used as fuel does not mean it cant be done. Your so stupid, go read your books your government feed your sheeple little mind.
lslinger 8 months ago
@lslinger So i am done with this conversation.. You probably claim the government is hiding free energy from us to lol. It's so sad, you obviously have no credentials in physics or chemistry. Nor any other science, so stop talking like you are informed on the topic because you've read a few Wikipedia pages.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck I have credentials in physics and plenty of research under my belt... They are with-holding "free energy" from us ever since the early 1900s... NIKOLA TESLA...do a little research and you'll see what is being suppressed.
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 From what you have said and by looking at your profile, it looks as if you have a very limited knowledge of physics or chemistry. You seem to have a solid grasp on made up conspiracy theories though, good job.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck Indeed that would be typical of a person with such an intellect. Perhaps you'd care to watch one of the videos and then make your decision; however, i'm sure you don't care.
Well I have my BA in architecture.. I'm not a physicist, nor do I endorse the claims of this video, but I sure as hell can separate truth from lies....and guess what... our world is based on lies.
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 So let me get this right? You attack me for giving correct information, now only to say that you don't oppose what i said anymore? You also claimed that you were a physicist at first. Pretty sure you've lost any form of high ground here. You can't simply believe a conspiracy because you read something on the internet, Dr Tesla never claimed he could create free energy to say otherwise is an insult. Anyways if a secret is so important to be kept, maybe it is for the better.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck haha um no. I NEVER claimed I was a physicist: "I have credentials in physics"..I do. I calculate loads every day.
I don't oppose what you say? what did you say? They ARE conspiracies!! That doesn't make them untrue!!!
Look up the definition of conspiracy.
Well, Tesla did in fact make that claim. He made it to his friends, the rockefellers, rothschilds, and the morgans...Once he told them we could substitute oil, they called him a lunatic, cut of funding and burnt down his office.
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 Just because you do some classical physic calculations in no way gives you "credentials". You obviously have no deep knowledge of physical chemistry or physics, so you don't have much of a say on the matter of free energy. You simply have to trust the word of science or go spend years learning for yourself and make up your own mind. I don't completely deny conspiracies in the world, that would be ignorant. It is also ignorant to believe half of the conspiracy theories you can find ---
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck 99.99999999% doesn't know what Tesla, Einstein and Hawking know/knew.. EVEYONE will have to take their word for it. And yes, I actually study both physics and chemistry in my spare time. (some would call it sad, but i love to learn). I have have more than fundamental knowledge in physics, ESPECIALLY on the quantum level. It's AMAZING!!! Did you know we have teleported information through photons?? just incredible.
Watch the FAA video, it may open your eyes..
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 If you actually go back and read my comments to which you are posting against you will see. How naive to consider only three people, you do realise there are many many other physicists right? Just because they are not famous, you think they are inferior? You think Hawking worked alone in the work that made him famous? I actually saw an article on quantum computing on google news,giving people information they can not comprehend is not a good idea in my opinion,only leads to conspiracy
mattymuck 8 months ago
@james3244 --- on the internet. Theres just simply too many of them out there written by lunatics and trolls alike. If it is impossible to prove a conspiracy, then thats all it can ever be... a conspiracy.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck I agree with that, but what you don't know is that I do extensive research.. I didn't spend 4 years of school studying and researching new materials and methods for nothing. I know how to research.
Some consp. are just absurd, such as the new "Roswell explanation".. wow, what a joke that is.. even more of a conspiracy than aliens!!! haha
I understand where you are coming from considering how many idiots are on youtube.
You, however, have ran in to someone with intelligence.
james3244 8 months ago
@mattymuck Giving correct information? You have given NO information except that my videos are all "conspiracies"...
If the 6th man to walk on the moon were to say, "we are not alone", you would just say, "NOPE, NOT TRUE"..
Well there's plenty more where that came from... Dr. Edgar MItchell isn't the only one.
How about an FAA Chief who has Visual, Plane, and Ground RADAR PROOF OF A SPACECRAFT NOT MADE BY MAN.
watch?v=t_w1OPgoR5M
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 Also out of curiosity, if you think you have such an "intellect". Why become an architect? Doesn't seem all that suitable for a logical mind to me. Do you mean you spent 4 years in high school studying chemistry and physics?
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck Architecture doesn't seem suitable for a logical mind?? Am I dealing with a 7-year-old?
I love to design and create. I am also an accomplished musician and I'd love to share my work with you or anyone.
Thanks for trying to insult me though.
4 years in high-school and then 4 years at the University of Western Ontario...muck.
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 Wasn't insulting you, when I say logical mind I refer to one that would excel in theoretical physics. Not going to get into an argument over how smart you think you are, I think you and I both realise how pointless that would be. Showering someone in conspiracy talk is not a smart way to start a conversation anyways... As I originally stated you don't have the right the claim free energy is being kept hidden.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@james3244 I'd sooner believe the governments are hiding spacecraft technology in order to fake an invasion, than an advanced alien race being among us. And you can't cite youtube as a source in any way...
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck To be honest, I never was interested in theoretical physics until Uni.. My source isn't youtube, it's John Callahan of the FAA(now retired).
And perhaps they are government vehicles!!! But that would mean they had discovered a technology that defies gravity and won't affect a person when 50 gs are applied.
The UFO phenomenon is real.. The question is, "who is behind it?"...and what technology can possible pull these impossible manoeuvres that conventional aircraft couldn't dream of?
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 Well even without going into this UFO matter, I still doubt it but i'm not denying it. It doesn't bother me to be honest, maybe things should be kept secret for a greater good lol. In any case I think there is a greater chance of my keyboard leaping of the desk than aliens on earth, how amazing it would be though haha.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck Indeed it would be amazing and more and more evidence is pointing to... they have been here a while.
We are alien to some other civilization. When there is billions and billions of stars in our galaxy alone, each one with the chance of planets with life orbiting around them.
When you add the fact that there are millions and millions of galaxies THAT WE KNOW OF, the chance of life somewhere else just increased exponentially.
Never-mind we have only been around 10 000+ years..
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 I have no doubt that there is life elsewhere, but complex life seems more unlikely and advance civilisations even more so. Put that together with traveling between galaxies which could be viewed as almost impossible. But yes maybe who knows. Ever thought about relativity in the case of aliens being able to travel at near light speed? lol our time would be insignificant.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck I'm saying our time is insignificant because we haven't been around for long at all..
Think about civilizations that have been around for 1 000 000 years!!!
They would be able to essentially cut corners in space time using accepted theoretical physics, such as black holes.
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 hence making our time even more insignificant lol. Although civilisations could destroy themselves or be destroyed naturally before becoming so advanced. Personally I find the idea of a civilisation destroying itself entirely hard to believe.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck It would definitely be hard to completely wipe out a civiliZation all by themselves. You are correct in the fact that if we were able to travel the speed of light, the person inside the craft would essentially be ageless.
I am more worried about natural disasters causing nuclear meltdowns than being destroyed by Iran, Russia, or China..
However, China's gonna want their money someday ;)
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 hehe what a variety of topics. Nuclear power is statistically quite safe. on the view of a civilisation though, I assume there would always be some survivors of a nuclear war. You would need to destroy the Earth somehow lol and by the time destroying planets was possible you would think other planets would have been colonised.
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck Nuclear power statistically IS quite safe.. but look at Chernobyl and Fukushima. Japan plans for these things and are actually one of the best protected against natural disasters..But that doesn't stop a 9.0 earthquake and a tsunami travelling at 500MPH.. We are seeing the radiation effects all the way over here in North America.. People still can't go back to Chernobyl!!
If the "New Madrid" fault were to go, there would be a few nuclear stations that would be affected.
james3244 8 months ago
@james3244 Meh, I don't see it as being catastrophic in a long term view. Any form of energy production can have its dangers. Apparently Hydro power was one that has the most common dangers if I remember right. I think Australia will end up building some nuclear plants, unless they decide to use more and more coal I don't see that going down well. I look forward to seeing what happens in the next 20 years or so lol. I am off, Good talk :) discussing our disagreements is the only way we learn ^^
mattymuck 8 months ago
@mattymuck and by 10 000 years, I mean "civilization", not bible talk.
james3244 8 months ago
@mattymuck sorry, I just read through the 2nd last post.. my grammar was just awful haha
james3244 8 months ago
@mattymuck BTW, I'd love to see you try and disprove the FAA senior officer and the radar proofs he has.
james3244 8 months ago
@mattymuck and before you get at me with same lame grammatical error, I speak and write 4 other languages so small mistakes are prone to happen. Just because your government or the MAINSTREAM science society does not want you to believe something does not make it impossible.
Now get a life, im done with this conversation. If you want to check out other sources (than your mainstream source) then your welcome to.
Otherwise have a good day and life.
lslinger 8 months ago
@lslinger for starters I said relativistic mass, obviously you have no knowledge of the theory of relativity. E=mc^2 generally refers to the change in mass depending on the relative frame of motion. Furthermore the original point was on fuels. Yes all matter is energy, so? Water is in its most stable state it can not be oxidised further, hence it is not a FUEL. You can't get ny additional energy from it. You are talking about annihilating matter, so you gonna go make up some anti matter are you?
mattymuck 8 months ago
This video's title contradicts itself. HHO/gas hybreds use both HHO and gas. "NO GAS" implies it runs exclusively on HHO, without any gasoline whatsoever!
stopdemockery 9 months ago
Why not develop it in another country? You know that your country is corrupt, owned by the oil companys, you wont get it through here, so why not go to Europe, sell your engine there, they are not as bought by the oil companys as in USA, like in my country sweden, they have never heard of this waterdriven engine, but they would take it on with open arms if you just told them about it, fuck who gets credit, aslong as we rid the world of gasoline driven cars!
banheden 9 months ago
Idea of a system, working with almost nothing goes back to 15th century.
After spending lots and lots of money, time and energy, none have worked
successfully until 16th century which academy of science in France
stated "we are no longer interested and considering perpetual machines."
You see it is much before discovering and using oil or nuclear energy.
these guys are charlatans and they don't know that same rules they are
using to make their system works, are opposing with it
vartatoosh 11 months ago
can this system use urine instead of water if yes then it is possible to urinate
in this car and then drive it.
Correct me if I'm wrong
vartatoosh 11 months ago
IF HUMANITY DOES NOT SHAPE UP , WHEN THE OIL IS FINISHED THET WILL START CHARGING YOU FOR WATER WICH WILL COME HAS A GLOBAL WARMING TAX OR MORE , TRUST ME, WATER CARS ARE POSSIBLE BUT THEY WILL KILL YOU .NOT UNTILL THEY FINISH THE OIL ,THEY ALREADY STARTED THE CARBON TAX FOR THIS REASON ,TO REPARE YOU FOR THE WATER TAX,
jamessawy 1 year ago
@jamessawy Uhm.. we already have water taxes.
seanotube85 1 year ago
@jamessawy Oil will last at least for another 600 years. It is true that consumption increases
but also it is true that new sources are discovering and extracting oil.
vartatoosh 11 months ago
@vartatoosh lol 600 years at this rate of use? no way. You'd be pushing it by far to say 200.
mattymuck 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
graywackeknifebdr 1 year ago
You can use a bycycle to power a car, you can use water to power a car, same with steam, same with metan, solar power... and so on. Of course, we don't do it because the private companies lose money and the government supports them. I am guessing that without that leash we would be in the space era now.
Bidmartinlo 1 year ago 22
@Bidmartinlo Couldn't have put it better myself
SMMsideproject 1 year ago
@SMMsideproject Thats only a % of the truth! We can do a lot more than we are doing now. Trust me!
Bidmartinlo 1 year ago
@Bidmartinlo Most certainly
SMMsideproject 1 year ago
@Bidmartinlo shut the fuck up, dude. what have you done? if it's possible then why dont YOU DO IT! it's not like you don't have the power to do it! but you sit on your fucking ass blaming "the man"
get a life.
elijahlucian 10 months ago
@elijahlucian It's been done, but theres more profit in oil and gass. I'm just suggesting that it's simple to get free energy. And technology is my life. ;(
Bidmartinlo 10 months ago
The Oil companies are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity.
Look for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in youtube video search. Join the Revolution!!
fittingciobb 1 year ago
Hey, I appreciated your video. I will subscribe so I can keep updated.
expertreviewsdotcom 1 year ago
Did the reporter call him Steve?
jab0805 1 year ago
@jab0805 Yes he did!
XTCMatrix 1 year ago
PUT OIL COMPANIES OUT OF BUSINESS!
EVERYBODY'S OUT OF A JOB ANYWAY TAKE THEM DOWN WITH US
myztainzydeout 1 year ago
Phisics have prooved this theory bullshit for over 50 years through the simple rule energy in = energy out, electrical energy in is grater than or equal to the energy contained in the hydrogen and oxygen. then minus the cell's efficiency of 60% and the alternators efficiency of 50% and there you go;.simply a scam
snowman3514 1 year ago
@snowman3514 realy....beliv it or not they made ...blah blah blah JUST...think about todays existing fuel cell chevy's equinox & honda's FCX clarity that just shows somthing
CEFD11777 1 year ago
@CEFD11777
they combine hydrogen/oxygen in a cell to create electricity. the complete opposite process that is been descrbed throughout this video. they are creating the hydrogen, oxygen through other means such as solar ect.. not running down your battery and recharging it through the alternator (as described in this video) i really cant be bothered explaining the phisics to you, plenty of sites/books explaining it. look yourself
snowman3514 1 year ago
@snowman3514
Energy in > energy out.
Yup, you're right.
But, don't forget that power in could be more than power out.
Takes camera's xenon flash as example.
afdhalatifftan92 1 year ago
And of coarse the oil companies are gonna go kill that guy like they did in the past with other inventors....When will people wake up? We need to change our cavemen attitudes towards oil. We have to do this for our planet, our health and our wallets, and we have to do this FAST!
xparfum 1 year ago
@xparfum todays existing fuel cell chevy's equinox & honda's FCX clarity that just shows somthing
CEFD11777 1 year ago
@xparfum
YES! very good attiude! but this unfortunatly is not the solution. solar/wind/geothermal/tidal are the future not a bogus system like this designed purely for fraud.
snowman3514 1 year ago
all we need to do is find a flamible fluid that wont be bad for the enviorment after burned
ryan129994 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have 4 e-books that show how to convert your car to run on HHO and how to make the set-up. You can download them free at
mediafire. com/file/zz2zillim3j/Run your car on water Ebooks.zip
Casper3417 1 year ago
Oh Ya sure lets all use the only source of human survival (water) just so we can go, joy riding,, I rather put my cash on Free energy.! Rather then end up like mars did.
BloodReaperz911 1 year ago
fuck you! You spammer
khoham 1 year ago
Yay, he converted an engine into steam power and "discovered" a new fuel source, good for him.
The bad thing is, you all argue like its something new.
turkeyninja 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CAN U FIND ANY VIDS WITH PROVEN RESULTS? NO
Because there are non, i fell for this hoax like other thousands, after two weeks of reaserch and having installed a 3ltr per min hho reactor i have no improvement in mileage or performance.
Im only thkfull because i didnt buy any instruction from fraudulent sites...
Now,i have learned over 15 reasons why it will not work. I will only mention 2 for lack of space.
if u want to know more let me know...
forfunmx 1 year ago
1) 4cil 2ltr engine uses 2,000 ltrs of air per minuteat 2000rpm
2ltrs x 2000rpms / 2 = 2000ltrs of air per min
3 or 6 ltrs per min of hho wont do s...
2) hho alone inside an engine contracts (implodes) into h2o (water) doesnt explode like gas therefore 4 stroke engines will not work on hho alone
SPREAD THE WORD!!
if you want to know more just let me know
forfunmx 1 year ago
BOOOO DECEPTIVE MARKETING PRACTICES!!!!
THat ant right man. The sweat solution indeed! WTF!? man...W-T-F!
For yall reading this. I am talking about his CLICKBANK link on the side. Click it to stop sweating now...
ATSucks1 1 year ago
Well... his site has been shut down...just like all the others that show promise...and his UT profile shows no activity for 3 months. KInda worrying.
grimbleahoy 2 years ago
has he had a accident yet?
Nevawake 2 years ago
i think they will kill him like they do with stanley meyer
hamza98888 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
CHRISTIANS OF THE WORLD DELIVERANCE IS COMING!
Seal yourself with holy spirit! Be holy, Root out your eyes for causing you to watch violence and pornography, cut away your sexual organs that lead you to adultery, sodomy, fornication, masturbation etc. Drink muriatic acid for smoking, abusing alcohol and drugs. Slit your throat for bowing to idols such as flag and crucifix. Do not attend church meetings, end Christendoom, restore Christian unity [Christianity], no church, no division!
.
conceil8 2 years ago
i just piss in my tank (afte a night out) and then the car runns for free .....:)
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
I will believe this crap when I see people posting videos of their cars driving on this stuff.
ScubaSteveM45 2 years ago
see also free global energy on YouTube...it has numerous details of people that have made magnetic engines that never need energy to run and about the inventor that built a buggy that ran on water only as a fuel source
bigrboy7 2 years ago
oil companies won't allow it cause if car manufacturers happened to make cars that ran on water/fuel then the oil companies would lose money...oil lobbyists are constantly pushing for this REAL technology not to become common...numerous people have been murdered because they have invented oil free running engines...google water powered buggy or look it up on YouTube and you'll begin to understand what I mean
bigrboy7 2 years ago
@bigrboy7 shit u r really an idiot. some nations depend on oil. and water powered car is a great idea if mixed with gasoline but alone NO. where would the energy needed to split the molecules of water come from? and pls dont say the alternator, that just puts a drag on the car.
dzgfdg 1 year ago
fuel companies would not allow this
zeebranut 2 years ago
Instead of using inefficient high pressure storage of H, we could develop nano matrices to contain the H+ and H- ionic plasma, like computer memory cells.
Even though H is very abundant, free H is rare on this planet because H is always captive, bounded to other elements. The nano-matrices that allows efficient energy level transition would be the replacement means of captivity of H ions.
miamidot 2 years ago
Because someones going to look at youtube comments for scientific advise...
hiroshika13 2 years ago
goodluck
Hsoj48 2 years ago
In a way, gasoline is a form of battery which takes millions of years to charge. Gasoline energy density is ~50 - 100 X that of the current best batteries. But gasoline combustion at best gives us 20% efficiency.
H2O > H2 + O reversibility provides high energy density as a battery, If someone can reduce the conversion waste.
Regen breaking wastes 60% of kinetic energy.
Success of elec car hinges on success in reducing energy conversion waste in high density H2O reversible energy storage.
miamidot 2 years ago
I converted my Pontiac Sunfire to water using this method and noticed about a 40% increase in mileage. I used the plans at:
squidoo(DOT)com/use-water-for-gas
taraff1 2 years ago
If this worked the car companies would be doing it...Simple isn't it.
waderiver 2 years ago
wrong, try again
otakukj 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HHmm.. Ever heard of the Parametric Resonance Effect--> Breaking the covalent bond without the archaic methods I'm sure you're defending..
Imagine Bunsen that a hundred years have passed and mankind is capable of traversing simple physical boundaries.
The Covalent Bond (Electromagnetic Force) is feebly bide and requires not the "Archaic" e- Bombardment Method- ie.the use of Amperage.. more, the exploitation of the EM Force, which is not the consumption of ENERGY.. but does work....mmmmm
(*Xy'
MajorUtah 2 years ago
Hmm.... a genius, eh? Stopped a nuclear reactor from melting down you say? I see.
So, how has he managed to get around the first law of thermodynamics and make water a viable source for fuel?
JustSomeGuy77 2 years ago
Water injection has been around for a long time. It does a lot of things, but producing cleaner emissions is not one of them. That much water would cool the combustion chamber enough to create more NOx in a day than most modern cars make in their lifetimes.
Theriomalstrom 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
Good day to all of my fellow Christians, firstly my apology for being out of topic. I came here to remind you people that the judgment day has started already. Please depart from cursing, smoking, violent entertainment, fornication, occultism, and for watching pornography etc. lest you be found not worthy to enter the kingdom of God in the Day of Execution. Thank you for your kind consideration.
.
conceil8 2 years ago
waterpowerconversion*com
jaym5k 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mega Joules per liter.
Gasoline 34.2
Gaseous Hydrogen at room temperature 0.01079
HHO, two parts H one part O so divide 0.01079 by 3 x 2 = energy density 0.00719 Mega Joules per liter at room temp.
Raise temp to typical HHO cell temp 185 F (60 amps input) gas expands 21.76 percent.
0.00719 divided by 121.76 x 100 energy density now 0.00590 Mega Joules per liter.
34.2 Mega Joules divided by 0.00590, ratio of 5,796.6 to one. One gallon of gasoline = 5,796.6 gallons of HHO.
EnergySupply2008 2 years ago
if you really want to run your car on water go to: thegas4free.blogspot,com
jedwhelchel 3 years ago
*cough* scam *cough*
JustSomeGuy77 2 years ago
rofl,
looks like what they are talking about is water injection. or steam power.
you burn normal gasoline vapor, yet you squirt in water as it combusts, the water evaporates and expands, generating force to move the piston.
problem is, it generates less power than a normal gasoline explosion in the chamber.
if you really want to save fuel, buy an economic car and not an suv. use public transportation and a bike, instead of driving those 2km to a friends house.
thinkppl 3 years ago
The tv station and reporters should be sued for promoting a scam.
What ever happened to checking out the facts first.
Nothing but a bunch of two bit scam artists.
robertyt2 3 years ago
its not a scam you ignorant cunt
stormfox1 2 years ago
this show you got a peanut size brain......Ever heard of Hydrogen burn better than gas....
guitarpikz 2 years ago
Ever heard of the first law of thermodynamics? When water is broken up into hydrogen and oxygen, it takes a certain amount of energy. When hydrogen is burned (i.e. reacted with oxygen) it produces the exact same amount of energy and turns back into water. No net energy is produced. You would need something to produce the energy to break the water up in the first place *cough* oil/gasoline *cough*
JustSomeGuy77 2 years ago
HHmm.. Ever heard of the Parametric Resonance Effect--> Breaking the covalent bond without the archaic methods I'm sure you're defending..
Imagine 77 that a hundred years have passed and mankind is capable of traversing simple physical boundaries.
The Covalent Bond (Electromagnetic Force) is feebly bide and requires not the "Archaic" e- Bombardment Method- ie.the use of Amperage.. more, the exploitation of the EM Force, which is not the consumption of ENERGY.. but does work....mmmmm
(*Xy'
MajorUtah 2 years ago
Well, actually no, I've never heard of that in my life. Care to explain it? Or are you too busy being self-satisfied? Do you have a source website that can explain it?
JustSomeGuy77 2 years ago
@JustSomeGuy77 well then theres several ways to use water in combustion engines, the most blabberd about is to use hydrogen gas to then use for extra power etc etc, there is however anbother far more used in big industrial and ship engines, allthough theyre diesel not gas and opperates on slightly different ways, the water is injected to control the humidety of the air, since it prevents uncontrollable temprerature peaks that is to high to be used and smoothes out the combustion, hope it helps
seekerofvision678 1 year ago
NO Brains here please, if this were right the universe would have been limited and Aliens would have come on bullock carts, Please Get out of your shells and your crammy shells!
radhe1234u 2 years ago
hydrogen is THE god of ALL Fuels!
radhe1234u 2 years ago
PEOPLE SAY FREE BECAUSE WATER YOU CAN GET FOR FRE ANYWHERE THEY MEAN FREE IN TERMS OF MARKETING NOT IN TERMS OF phisics
soton000 3 years ago 7
this video is horrible
kaduisaui 3 years ago
Lets just say there's no such things as 'free' energy! Unless you're prepared to pedal the car yourself, stick a house sized solar panel to your car roof or strap a massive wind power generator to the front of it or all three.
mattnemski 3 years ago
ironic that his name is Steve Meyers.
Stan Meyers was the guy that got killed for making a 100% water car.
bccritters 3 years ago 2
He didnt make it at all.
Its not possible to run a car on 100% water!
C32347K17732 3 years ago
how do you know that? dont tell my the law of thermodynamics, i already know it.
what, in YOUR experience has made you conclude that this is not possible? NOT your opinion based on what you have read, your EXPERIENCE/EXPERIMENTS etc??
bccritters 3 years ago
I think you dont know.
They are talking about make energy out of water. That is not possible!
At some point they say they make a powerful mix out of the water. Ok possible(H2) but you still need(!) energy to make that mix.
You still need fossil fuels to electrolyse water!
C32347K17732 3 years ago
why do people automatically assume that when people look for alternative energies that they are trying to break the laws of thermodynamics?
all people are trying to do is get energy from places other than coal and oil. solar works, wind works, why dont you guys rag on them? do you think those are the only two possible alternatives in the entire universe?
chopping wood to heat your home is FREE ENERGY, this is the same thing that people are looking for here.
bccritters 3 years ago
chopping wood isnt free energy.
2H2O + energy -> 2H2 + O2
2H2 + O2 - > 2H2O + energy
both energys are the same... so where does meyer gets his energy from?
explain it dont just say it possible!
C32347K17732 3 years ago
chopping wood isnt free energy? do you live in a communist country or something? last time i checked it was free to chop down a tree on your property and burn it.
OOOO, you think that when we say "free energy" you ASSume that we mean magically create energy out of thin air....
i wish you guys would understand what is trying to be accomplished here. open your eyes. FREE means something we dont have to pay the electric company for, not break some law of physics.
bccritters 3 years ago
Still this is not possible!
Come on think!
C32347K17732 3 years ago
what is not possible? splitting water through electrolysis and recombining it again through fire? ive done it myself, it is possible. it isnt over-unity, but it is possible.
bccritters 3 years ago
What is not possible?:
Get more energy out of it then you put into it.
Possible:
splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen.
C32347K17732 3 years ago
so we agree, then why did we even have this conversation?
sometimes, i have found, that there are energy inputs into a device that are not necessarily known by the inventor. this is were APPARENT over-unity comes from. this is how equations can be confused. they only add A+B inputs and get ABC output, and assume that C is over-unity. they simply failed to find C on the input.
bccritters 3 years ago
No, it isn't *LOL* - The sun delivers the energy via the sunlight which is then bound chemically in the wood ( it has the potential for burning and releasing this stored energy as heat).
The only free thing about it is, that you don't have to spend other fossils fuels to produce it - unlike the "free" hydrogen in this case !. So essentially the sun does the work for us.
And there is btw. only a limited amount of wood as well.
ElvenDane 3 years ago
algae works too...
wonder about this?... electrons in a ciruit are lighter than heavy protons, so they start moving when a switch is turned on.
but if you turn the switch off before the protons start moving, they have no place to go, so they stay where they were and the electrons are trapped in the load side the charge retains itself.
This is the idea behind a pulsed circuit.
And what does it mean for the laws of thermodynamics when they are broken all the time in quantuum physics?
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
but if you plant 20 seeds per tree you cut down, it is unlimited.
linear thinking hasnt gotten us anywhere, we need more dynamic thought processes and plans. many of those trees can mature within 20 years or less, very easy to self sustain FREE energy.
if i own my own oil well and use it, it is FREE energy.
bccritters 3 years ago
Yes, and don't forget the energy that is lost in both processes as surplus heat !
It's an ernergy deficit - can only be used as
an energy store ( where you will lose a lot of the energy, mind you - maybe about half of it even in the best possible case ! ( NB. just my guess ).
ElvenDane 3 years ago
Because of the crazy postulates they make about "free energy" and "water powered cars" etc., which is total nonsense.
As for wood, coal, oil and gas it's a whole different game, since it's essentially stored energy from the sun via biological processes and later heat + very hig pressure from the Earth. So the Sun (and the Earth) has done the work for us in those cases !
ElvenDane 3 years ago
The same principle goes for uranium, but in that case the energy (bound in an unstable mass of atomic core particles ) comes from the universe (Supernovae) - or indirectly via other radioactive elements ( in the case of plutonium ).
ElvenDane 3 years ago
but if you chop your own wood, isnt it free?
bccritters 3 years ago
Which will take far more energy than they get back as in the other end.
It's incredible what people are willing to believe. Only if the use "breaking energy" or
surplus heat will this scheme ever work.
It would be far wiser making more efficient ICE's - it can be done. You could even have
them work fewer cylinders - say 6 or even 4 instead of 8, when they are not needed ( which is most of the time ).
Now, that would really save a LOT !
ElvenDane 3 years ago
Well, obviously you didn't read them and do not understand, what they say :-)
ElvenDane 3 years ago
Im pleased to see that most people on the same page, this what is needed to change this world for the better.
tifosiman68 3 years ago
Why use water when it's more needed for life than gas veg or other powers? or is saltwater useable? I'm sorry, I've not listened to this or read far enough down the comment sheet to see if I'm immediately proved wrong; but look at OZ and Africa for the importance of drinkable water as the true oil of our world... ...man...
r8media 3 years ago
come on cunt just tell us how to do it
BigDaddyGdog 3 years ago
Off topic: I think this is the worst lag I've ever seen in my life. The audio and video are off by at least a minute.
KBImonstar 3 years ago
Funny, but a total hoax. Water is not a fuel, every monkey knows that.
Also, manmade global warming is a hoax. If the story of manmade global warming was convincing enough on its own, why would they lie about so many things? South pole: growing. Polar bears: population growing. Connection between global temperatures and CO2: not proven, just claimed. Also, global temperatures have varied for all eternity, so why shouldn't they now?
Manmade global warming is an utter HOAX!
alex2143 3 years ago
dumbshi.. it isn't burning water you putz, but Hydrodgen and Oxygen.
plus this tech isn't about producing CO2, but elite control over energy consumption... oil is centralized, water isn't. fucking wanker!
god damn I'm pissed off!! but its better than getting pissed on..
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Dude. "WATER"! It's in the god damn title! Not hydrogen and oxygen, but WATER! You can burn hydrogen, but you first need to produce it. You can't produce hydrogen, then burn it, and hope to get a positive outcome. It literally defies the laws of physics, which has never been done, and will never be done.
You, sir, are an utter and complete moron. I've done research on hydrogen fuel cells, and you? I know what I'm talking about. You, obviously, don't.
alex2143 3 years ago 2
Well.. now that I have your attention, they are not claiming to defy the laws... they are utilizing the alternator to serve as a catalyst for ignition, bringing about a more wholesome efficient system...
hydrogen fuel cells are a wasted research endeavor because its so much harder to store compressed hydrogen and just as heavy.
So, Store it in water and hey you even get an oxy boost.
or just say fuckit and legalize the Hemp industry and get our gas that way... I agree thou GW = Hoax
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
They are claiming to be able to run them on water. "Steve's process modifies tap water into a powerful fuel" AKA hydrogen, which cannot be produced, then consumed with a positive outcome.
Also, I'm not sure how you're going to use tap water as a catalyst for a combustion. Water doesn't burn.
Hydrogen can also be stored in metalhydrides, which create bonds with the hydrogen. Don't know everything about them, but some of them actually store hydrogen denser than in its liquid form.
alex2143 3 years ago
Storing hydrogen in water would result in an acid. Breaking this bond would require additional energy. Also, you can't remove the oxygen in water. It'd be the same as hydrogen production, which costs energy.
Legalising the hemp industry would also be good, I guess. I don't know if the world can produce enough fuel from farm land alone, though. Especially since farm land is also used for the production of food.
alex2143 3 years ago
hemp is easily grown.. we produce a large amount of food ... most is grown to feed farm animals. Algae can also produce hydrocarbons. hey try this for higher MPG: Ice infront of the air intake.
I've got the notion that a hybrid utilizes more than 2 sources of energy. hydrogen is stored as a covalent bond with oxygen. -- electrolysis of water can be perfected and the resulting hydrogen AND OXyGEN will allow a more complete burn in a piston.
the NWO is comming so we might need this tech
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
The law of the conservation of energy directly contradicts that. What you're trying to do is convert water to hydrogen and oxygen, then back to water, and you hope to gain energy with that. It is, quite literally, impossible.
alex2143 3 years ago
plus have you ever combusted something in 100% oxygen? it is a much more energetic reaction... how do you think a regular car would perform in 100% oxygen atmosphere?
Don't you uderstand the importance of oxygen in an explosion?
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Oxygen is a necessity for combustion. It just seems inefficient to produce it, if you can get it from the air.
I guess fuel would burn well in a 100% oxygen environment, but I still don't know if the boost gained from the added oxygen is enough to make up for the energy used in the production.
alex2143 3 years ago
so there is an element of unknown with what they are pursuing...
I can infer that an increase of MPG would be evidence of the engine making up for the energy used in production of HHO. I've got some stainless-steel wire ... I'm going to try it. -- I'll have some videos posted.. check up on my progress.
I might try cooling the air infront of my air intake.. I heard that does exceptionally well.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Good luck. You might need a strong heat pump for the air intake, since a cold body would heat up of its own.
alex2143 3 years ago
It would probably ruin the engine very quickly :-)
Actually you can have too much ogygen -
and the fumes would be very likely to ignite spontaneously and unctrolled.
ElvenDane 3 years ago
Exactly - like a perpetuum mobile.
At least that seems to be what SOME of these people are saying.
ElvenDane 3 years ago
Also, the process of electrolysis may very well come near perfection (but since nothing man makes is perfect, energy will still be lost), but the reaction in a hydrogen fuel cell can't. The maximum theoretical energy efficiency (theoretical, so the actual efficiency will be lower) is 80%. The rest will be converted into heat.
A car that runs on water is impossible, also according to the law of the conservation of energy.
alex2143 3 years ago
you are not understanding my point... what about a gas/water hybrid? more efficient?
I also saw something where a scientist was pursuing something bu, ended up lighting saltwater on fire with radiowaves... look that one up.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Okay, that might be possible. Sorry, I was confused by the title (which seems to be wrong). Water alone will not power a car though, and I'm glad we agree on that.
Thanks, I'll look it up. Sounds interesting.
alex2143 3 years ago
Finally - great to see someone who understands the basics :-)
ElvenDane 3 years ago
HHO Mythbusters Explained
99minerkc 3 years ago
HHO Mythbusters Explained
99minerkc 3 years ago
Google gaswaterhybridcars
lickal0tapuss 3 years ago
These people are disgusting scammers, preying on the poor, no less. $600 would be peanuts if you could reduce fuel consumption by 70%, so clearly they are trying to make a quick buck off the poor.
You cannot extract energy in this way.
THINK, people. Wouldn't the oil companies have bought all this up and started selling hydrogen? Most people here have the intelligence of a monkey (though at least monkies don't get scammed)
ARM02 3 years ago 2
Guys it is never going to happen, no one cares, all we want is money, everyone needs money, you know like what Optimus Prime said in Transformers, i think he said they are a earlier speacies or something like that lol, tha is what we all are, all of us are stupid. LOL!! We need this technology now, not later, what is aliens take over the world
areyoulosers 3 years ago
It's not about that - it simply just doesn't work ;-) At least not in the sense they claim here and elsewhere - only if you use it as a way of making use of otherwise wasted energy -storing (some of)it as hydrogren - in the very ineff. ICE's - esp. the large US ones.
( type 3 l,V8 etc. A complete waste)
You could easily achive 50-100 % more if you didn't insist on those vastly over powered engines that sits in many US cars, which are often unnesc. big and heavy as well btw.
ElvenDane 3 years ago
This set of plans is free on the net. google "hytronics". Don't buy them like I did. The only reason to buy plans is tech support and there is none through these guys. Questions disappear into the void never to be seen again.
HaywireHaywood 3 years ago
ROFLMAO
Thanks for the warning :-)
Guess you should have seen it coming.
Lots of hoaxes and scams in this bizz.
ElvenDane 3 years ago
ok and for the record hydrogen kits dont work for them to work you have to have the kit triple sized and thats bigger than most trunks and so much for having a pickup mr.t at uti
thatwasdumb 3 years ago
Hey ! , be careful , you are not the original , we have it already way back in the 60's . Fucking claim .
ARYtable 3 years ago