it was only a conceptual view of how the software worked back then, 4 years in IT is a long time, we had a solution to productify the whole store with true planograms, it would have been 2d views though.
Considering the technology used in this film is getting close to 5 years now, I would agree the frame rate is poor. However the video was to help management visualize what most store planners know and understand when designing stores in 2D. When this was created a business opted for 3D still shots costing close to $11000 for 3 images rendered, investing in the software would have given the business continued returns as they worked out there concept before going to market. Hope that helps.
it was only a conceptual view of how the software worked back then, 4 years in IT is a long time, we had a solution to productify the whole store with true planograms, it would have been 2d views though.
ppasten 3 weeks ago
and then the famous question arrises shouldnt we productify all the empty shelfs?
there goes framerate to a crippling halt;)
but nice overall view.
TheJustinfernandez 7 months ago
Considering the technology used in this film is getting close to 5 years now, I would agree the frame rate is poor. However the video was to help management visualize what most store planners know and understand when designing stores in 2D. When this was created a business opted for 3D still shots costing close to $11000 for 3 images rendered, investing in the software would have given the business continued returns as they worked out there concept before going to market. Hope that helps.
ppasten 1 year ago
I wasn't sold because of the low frame rate. While the modeling is good, FR can kill.
ddrmaxman 1 year ago
wich software do you use?
XtremePeople 3 years ago
This was mocked on Autodesk Revit
ppasten 3 years ago