Given that the world is over-populated and resources are running low, it might be best for humanity to either wipe them all out (ie. do what is necessary for peaceful co-existence among logical ppl) or completely seal off (ie. no trade,communication,no nothing) those populations that cannot accept other's culture,beliefs and ways of life.
1) the world is not over populated. 2) what resources are running low? resources that are mismanaged because of government backed retards managing them (think corporatism)?
3)there is nothing logical about mass genocide. that is what a severely unbalanced individual would support. do you think that this conflict in the middle east is one sided, that a bunch of crazies came out of no where and for no reason wants to wreak havoc on the "free" world? bull shit, go read up on "blow back" and
those populations ARE NOT OBLIGATED to accept your beliefs or your cultures. they are not obligated accept anyone's, even their owns. they should be able to practice self determination. thing is though, they can't when you have foreign intervention in the form of imperialism and foreign aid (aka bribing corrupt dictators and keeping puppet statists in power).
These populations HAVE a right to keep believing their Bronze age bullshit, it dosen't bother me. The only time it affects me is when it affects my peace, security and access to resources. I could care less what happens to them or what they do - they can all go to their respective hells, just dont involve others in it.
I agree that they have been f**ked around with by foreign intervention, but then why did it occur in the first place? Why was the culture and society so weak and cheap?
Maybe it's because the people were stupid? No need to talk about being educated or not, because even an illiterate villagers know damn well when outsiders are trying to steal their water source and cattle. These populations practiced self-determination, but they were too stupid to do anything progressive with it and now are just a dirty battle field. Look at China, the west tried to f**k around with them, and now they are f**king every1 nicely. Why is that? It's because they didnt have some
stupid Bronze Age superstitions preventing them from progressing and doing what was logical to move ahead.
BOTTOM LINE, stupids deserve to suffer or do whatever they want to do. It dosen't bother me until it affects my lifestyle and enjoyment of my own logical existence.
1) +6 billion people, the rapid decline in the natural habitat, extinction of so many species, loss of forest cover in the amazon.
2) Again you got no proof so its ur word vs mind. Given the current rate of over consumption resource ARE running low, why do you think the push for green sources of energy? Obviously with a more conservative approach, there could be enough for all, but the reality and most likely scenario is that things are going to run out and run out fast. ex: Arabs & Feraris.
1)loss of habitat is due to government subsidized farmers. the government of brazil pays farmers to farm. what the hell do you think the farmers are going to do? farm for shit! burn down trees!
2)do you realize how much oil is in north america alone, yet our politicians don't let us drill? there are billions of oil in untapped resources, in our mid west, alaska and even Russia's newly claimed north atlantic.
-also, government restricts sensible alternatives including diesel and hemp
3) There is nothing logical about it, but the truth is the logical ppl are dealing with barbarians that are NOT logical. Do you think a logical man will just sit by and get attacked by some thieves and bullies? NO, the logical man will fight back. High moral,etc aside, in the end it's kill or be killed, and guess what, the crazies in the middle East should all be wiped out. Im not differentiating between crays Israelis and the Arabs. If the 2 kinds of crazies cant get along and threaten the rest
3) green source of energy = more taxes and subsidies for lobbyists. there is a push for green mostly because of the "manmade" global warming scandal. look up "climategate". there is nothing wrong with green, but there is a difference between retarded alternatives like inefficient windmills and h cell cars.
dude. do you even understand the nature of the whole conflict? who do you think funded the madrassas that radicalized the afghanis? our fucking politicians to fight the ussr.
why do you think obl initiated the wtf attacks in the early 90s and the attacks in saudi arabia in the late 90s? why do you think al queda attacked the twin towers on 9/11? ill tell you why, and it is the reason the perpretrators gave - foreign powers are meddling in the affairs of the middle east, they are sanctioning and killing millions of kids, and funding the apartheid state of israel. dont believe me? it's fact, look it up. and study some history while you are at it, geesh.
Wipe them all out says I. Wipe out the Taliban and all the crazies, we don't need them. People from the Middle East tend to be crazies. Judaism, Islam or Christianity, all 3 are different flavors of the same troublesome,illogical and intolerable religion. All 3 have always caused problem in the world. Perhaps, it's because ppl are inherently violent, and these provide the practitioners with ready-made enemies(each other and other faiths) that the crazies are drawn to these religions.
we can fight the taleban(which usa helped prop up), but we cannot with our current strategy. if you want to fight a geurilla warfare, you send out mercenaries to fight fire with fire. there is too much red tape with sending limited troops between strategists and politicians, and a full on war would cause mass humanitarian strife and sink the usa into deeper dept. look up: letters of marque and reprisal.
those religions have not caused a problem. do you know who causes the problems? - politicians
Taaaaaa Liiiii Baaaaaan
Ta Ta Ta Taaaaaaa Liiiiiii Baaaaaaan
LOL .. US is a toothless bitch all said and done .. what you need is Chinese army, they'd wipe out the Taliban hard core.
oyePhoker 2 years ago
if you try to wipe out the taleban, you will have to commit a mass genocide to do that.
feeknocks 2 years ago
Given that the world is over-populated and resources are running low, it might be best for humanity to either wipe them all out (ie. do what is necessary for peaceful co-existence among logical ppl) or completely seal off (ie. no trade,communication,no nothing) those populations that cannot accept other's culture,beliefs and ways of life.
oyePhoker 2 years ago
1) the world is not over populated. 2) what resources are running low? resources that are mismanaged because of government backed retards managing them (think corporatism)?
3)there is nothing logical about mass genocide. that is what a severely unbalanced individual would support. do you think that this conflict in the middle east is one sided, that a bunch of crazies came out of no where and for no reason wants to wreak havoc on the "free" world? bull shit, go read up on "blow back" and
feeknocks 2 years ago
world history in general.
those populations ARE NOT OBLIGATED to accept your beliefs or your cultures. they are not obligated accept anyone's, even their owns. they should be able to practice self determination. thing is though, they can't when you have foreign intervention in the form of imperialism and foreign aid (aka bribing corrupt dictators and keeping puppet statists in power).
feeknocks 2 years ago
there is only one necessary requirement for there to be peaceful coexistance, that politicians and corporatists need to be neutered.
the war is about power, opiate, money, and oil. nothing more, nothing less.
feeknocks 2 years ago
These populations HAVE a right to keep believing their Bronze age bullshit, it dosen't bother me. The only time it affects me is when it affects my peace, security and access to resources. I could care less what happens to them or what they do - they can all go to their respective hells, just dont involve others in it.
I agree that they have been f**ked around with by foreign intervention, but then why did it occur in the first place? Why was the culture and society so weak and cheap?
oyePhoker 2 years ago
Maybe it's because the people were stupid? No need to talk about being educated or not, because even an illiterate villagers know damn well when outsiders are trying to steal their water source and cattle. These populations practiced self-determination, but they were too stupid to do anything progressive with it and now are just a dirty battle field. Look at China, the west tried to f**k around with them, and now they are f**king every1 nicely. Why is that? It's because they didnt have some
oyePhoker 2 years ago
stupid Bronze Age superstitions preventing them from progressing and doing what was logical to move ahead.
BOTTOM LINE, stupids deserve to suffer or do whatever they want to do. It dosen't bother me until it affects my lifestyle and enjoyment of my own logical existence.
oyePhoker 2 years ago
1) +6 billion people, the rapid decline in the natural habitat, extinction of so many species, loss of forest cover in the amazon.
2) Again you got no proof so its ur word vs mind. Given the current rate of over consumption resource ARE running low, why do you think the push for green sources of energy? Obviously with a more conservative approach, there could be enough for all, but the reality and most likely scenario is that things are going to run out and run out fast. ex: Arabs & Feraris.
oyePhoker 2 years ago
1)loss of habitat is due to government subsidized farmers. the government of brazil pays farmers to farm. what the hell do you think the farmers are going to do? farm for shit! burn down trees!
2)do you realize how much oil is in north america alone, yet our politicians don't let us drill? there are billions of oil in untapped resources, in our mid west, alaska and even Russia's newly claimed north atlantic.
-also, government restricts sensible alternatives including diesel and hemp
feeknocks 2 years ago
3) There is nothing logical about it, but the truth is the logical ppl are dealing with barbarians that are NOT logical. Do you think a logical man will just sit by and get attacked by some thieves and bullies? NO, the logical man will fight back. High moral,etc aside, in the end it's kill or be killed, and guess what, the crazies in the middle East should all be wiped out. Im not differentiating between crays Israelis and the Arabs. If the 2 kinds of crazies cant get along and threaten the rest
oyePhoker 2 years ago
3) green source of energy = more taxes and subsidies for lobbyists. there is a push for green mostly because of the "manmade" global warming scandal. look up "climategate". there is nothing wrong with green, but there is a difference between retarded alternatives like inefficient windmills and h cell cars.
dude. do you even understand the nature of the whole conflict? who do you think funded the madrassas that radicalized the afghanis? our fucking politicians to fight the ussr.
feeknocks 2 years ago
why do you think obl initiated the wtf attacks in the early 90s and the attacks in saudi arabia in the late 90s? why do you think al queda attacked the twin towers on 9/11? ill tell you why, and it is the reason the perpretrators gave - foreign powers are meddling in the affairs of the middle east, they are sanctioning and killing millions of kids, and funding the apartheid state of israel. dont believe me? it's fact, look it up. and study some history while you are at it, geesh.
feeknocks 2 years ago
Wipe them all out says I. Wipe out the Taliban and all the crazies, we don't need them. People from the Middle East tend to be crazies. Judaism, Islam or Christianity, all 3 are different flavors of the same troublesome,illogical and intolerable religion. All 3 have always caused problem in the world. Perhaps, it's because ppl are inherently violent, and these provide the practitioners with ready-made enemies(each other and other faiths) that the crazies are drawn to these religions.
oyePhoker 2 years ago
we can fight the taleban(which usa helped prop up), but we cannot with our current strategy. if you want to fight a geurilla warfare, you send out mercenaries to fight fire with fire. there is too much red tape with sending limited troops between strategists and politicians, and a full on war would cause mass humanitarian strife and sink the usa into deeper dept. look up: letters of marque and reprisal.
those religions have not caused a problem. do you know who causes the problems? - politicians
feeknocks 2 years ago
Fookin' prawns mate! Don't point your fookin' tentacles at me!! Where's the fookin' catfood eh you sneaky fookin' prawns??
spotandedgar 2 years ago
this is why they disable comments because of people like you ... thanks for ruining it for everyone
jax1492 2 years ago 5