yeaaaaaaah? bigest fake? but ....but no .....coment please)))))) I think you just eneducated asshole, you know about russians nothing, урод грузинский.....
and by the way, the russian empire of many years later was built on the backs of the east slavic cities. modern russia was launched by muscovy, who only got its power from the monghols as a deal to collect taxes and tribute from the other slavic principalites for the khan.
so muscovy gets rich off of its neighbours doing the scab work for the mongol khans in return for a token overlordship of the other slavs.
not such a proud heroic way to found a nation really. and has been the USSR model
Russia was not found after the end of the Mongol dynasty, and Muscovy launched attacks led by Dimitri Donskoi against Mongol Hordes on Don River, whilst being at the same level of pressure as other Eastern principalities.
Hmm... You've taken one aspect of the situation, hardly a unique thing about Moscow actually, and magnified it to encompass everything, which you then turn into a narrative of Russian expansion and political oppression. You're already more than halfway to writing a popular history that will sell millions in America!
You might want to try to be more analytical, though, if you want to pass high school history class.
@Euroslav I guess Canada was built on the backs of Canadian cities )) Tributes were payed by all principalities, including Moscow, which became dominant at that time. The great princess were appointed by the khan himself, nobody made deals like will rob our neighbours for you just dont touch us. If you want to express your russophobic attitude so much, try using some logic next time
so in reality, kievan rus is a medieval eastslavic state composed of ancient ukrainians, belarussians, and far eastern slavs (whos anscestors today have been greatly diluted by finns, magyars, tartars, mongols, turks, huns.... you name it,)
so lets not pretend that "mother russia" today has really anything to do with kievan rus, other than copying its culture and having its slavic language due to kievan rus's dominance in eastern europe.
I can smell your heavy scent of russophobia, but Kievan Rus was a compliation of the Rus' people...Russians, Ukrainains and Belorussians. You have yet to learn history Canadian scum!
Aha! What?! Rus WAS a people consisting of ural-Finnish, Norse and Varangian background, each having set their principalities in Eastern Europe!Kievan Rus', even as the name suggests, had the majority of Russian and Ukrainian ethenticity.
The term Rus actually comes from the name of a group of Varangians, whose leader was invited to become prince of the Novgorod republic to protect it. His prestige was great enough that his sons were invited to become princes in many other Russian cities, to the point where most of Russia was ruled by the Rurikovich family, and though they assimilated into slavs within a few generations, their name "Rus" stuck. Kiev was simply the most glorious and powerful of the Russian states, the hegemon.
I personally buy the traditional theory, that they were Vikings, because that's where their names come from.
It's not that important. At that time, much of the Baltic Sea coast was covered by little tribes which spoke unique dialects and had a unique culture, most of which didn't stay in place for more than a few generations. Rurik and his Rus are probably not even closely linked with any modern nation, whatever the Swedes say. They were totally slavicized after a few generations anyway.
At the time of the Kiev's ascendancy, there was no difference between East Slavs. They all called themselves Russians, and lived in small, often electoral principalities, similar to the Greek city states before Alexander. They were united by culture and religion, where they all had a single metropolitan bishop. They were only pulled apart when Poland and Lithuania conquered many of the western states, and even then there was no formally recognized ethnic/language division until the XIX century.
>lets not pretend that "mother russia" today has really anything to do with kievan rus
What a nonsense... Guess Finns and Mongols have built Novgorod,Moscow and Saint Petersburg and copied Slavic language,orthodox religion and culture in our heads just because of Kievan Rus dominance?!What is the reason Chenghiz Khan isnt our national hero and Tatar language isnt our official?!
And what about Slavs of ancient Novgorod,Rostov,Ryazan,Murom,Yaroslavl,Suzdal? Did they all disappeared?
and if any of you want to argue this, you dont stand a chance. just look up R1a1 the most common strand of DNA in slavs all around the world. very common in czech, slovak, poland, croatio, slovenia, ukraine, serbia, belarus.......... even hungary and east germany are full of this strand, the russians only have this common slavic DNA in the west (smolensk, vitebsk, orel, vyazma....) and areas around pskov-moscow- petersburg- and further east have been proven to have closer blood to finns &estonia
There is no genetically pure country in any famous part of Eurasia. That is all that genetic research can, at this point, tell us, and is something we also know from common sense.
Beyond that, genetic research is useless and unreliable, researchers are always contradicting each other because there is a huge amount of raw information, with no order so we can not, with current technology and understanding, figure out how to process it properly. Many researchers have a political agenda, anyway..
wow, the russians have impressed me. not only has this director falsely assumed that kievan rus was russia, but he fails to acknowledge that the lands of kievan rus were east slavic and filled with predecossors of the ukrainians and belarussians (they are independant states now, deal with it ivan.) the anscestors of modern "slavic" russians lived there too but most were on the eastern ouskirts and mixed with ural-finns. so infact, modern russia has far less claim to kievan rus than ukrain&belars
They're all relevant to your post, but you don't seem to understand them. You'd probably feel pretty offended if parts of your country suddenly declared independence, and I came in and used similar words about your country.
Русские, украинцы и белорусы очень близкие по крови народы.. Наверное никакой разницы в генотипе нет вообще.. Просто Украина и Белоруссия некоторое время прожив под Речью Посполитой переняли некоторые ее особенности..
Не забывай что всю историю мы сражались, то против Польши, то против России и у нас небыло возможности построить централизованную власть. Хотя судя по сему опыту, нам нужно твёрдая рука - монархия. В России есть не формальная монархия.
В России нет на данный момент никакой монархии... Есть "централизованная демократия"
Что-то не помню как много Украина воевала с Россией... Помнится только сомнительная битва при Конотопе.. Если честно вообще украинцы как отдельный народ мне лично не очень представляются
Чтото я не припоминаю когда и по какому поводу мы предали Киев??? До развала СССР была и УССР (тоисть Украина) и РСФСР (Россия) и другие социалистические республики которых Ленин обьединил против империализма и признал Россию теми же правами что и других республик.
Вообще-то Киев - наш город,который вы,предатели, захапали после развала СССР.Украина - это всё наши земли.Чем вы,малоросы,можете гордиться,кроме как тем,что Киев - часть вашей страны?Вы не Русь,а нерусь.
Тем более галицкий князь начал битву без приказа. В той битве было три князя (Черниговский,Галицкий и Киевски). Как видишь, никем из вашей теперешней России и не пахло...
Конници у нас было мало восновном пешие а Монголы-лучшие лучники-наездники того времени. Даже если и Мстислав Романович Киевский пошел выручать Мстислава Удалого он бы мог загибнуть и тем самым оставить Киевское правление без князя...
Киевский князь не решился ударить во фланг чтобы спасти Галицького князя, было такое. потому что строй русичев стоял неправильно. Ты вообще представляешь какая там битва была??? 30 тис.монголо-татар и 80 тис. Русичев с половцями.
Ваш князь Юрий Долгорукий и ваше Владимиро-Суздальское княжество, которое отказало в помощи против Монголо-татар настоящей Руси-УКРАИНЕ! А то что ты говоришь что вокруг России все територии назывались "окраина" то это детский лепит...
твой возраст не отвечает твоему уму... только самый необразованый люббен будет такое отвечать....Тебе просто завидно что украинские територии всегда будут славнее в истории нежели Россия.
вот правильное выражение "украинские территории". потому что государства украина не было и не будет. то что есть сейчас - временное недоразумение. но собственно скоро это недоразумение наши политики сами и исправят
kakie naxuj korni? tebe tozhe mozgi promyli? ukraincy pojavilis' v period Pervoj Mirovoj s podachi nemeckoj i avstrijskoj razvedki, poskolku schitavshie sebja russkimi zhiteli Galitchiny oxotno pomogali russkim vojskam. Pravda za eto avstricy v konclagerjax ubili 150 tys galitchan, no komu oni nuzhny, nepravil'nye kakie-to ukraincy byli
@vinniepuh Ya soglasen s toboi, tol'ko govorit' o ykraincah kak o ne rysskih schitayu ne pravel'no. Ykraincu (malorosu), rossiyane (velikorosu) i belorusu (belorosu) eto 1 etnos - rysskie. Slava Rusi!!!
Я не понимаю, зачем росияне забирают у нас, украинцев, нашу историю??? Это всё ложь! Потому что к Росие относится лиш Московия. А Новгород принадлежал Киеву!!!
Америкосы субтитры требуют переведи им, или не пиши названия на английском.
redneck10ivan 5 months ago
i demand subtitles!
Superchickenman159 11 months ago
@Superchickenman159
they are being translated.
very soon they will be posted.
vinniepuh 11 months ago
@vinniepuh yay! thx!
Superchickenman159 11 months ago
@vinniepuh Can you translate this already?! 1 month since you last said you would translate this and you still havent...
AvramIancu1848 9 months ago
@AvramIancu1848 I made a translation of the first episode, will post it soon. then maybe will translate more )
urka666 8 months ago
@vinniepuh 8 months later.... WHEREIISTHEYS!
Smael64 2 months ago
@Superchickenman159 tried to translate the first episode. its uploaded. will try to translate more when free time will appear.
urka666 8 months ago
А где же все фильмы этой серии ?
alexstariikon 1 year ago
Russia=Europe dogface with pathetic history.
Thanks Poland for 1920 war.
xsaav 1 year ago
@xsaav How could anyone ever consider Russian history pathetic? It's all amazing, really.
TheLadyReye 1 year ago
@xsaav no problemo. If not Poland ,then who ? All countreis were affraid..Poland first to fight,
trelemoreleization 11 months ago
I LOVE IT, pero no entiendo ruso, I can't understand Russian. Sub in Spanish or English please
TheDarkLadySally 1 year ago
значи Русия е сравнително нова държава от помияри
vaskobs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
English
fuck you with your english
Uchi Russki ubludok
vetaln 1 year ago
you should make subtitles, if a lot a people whana know what it says ))
urka666 2 years ago
English
RobloxFreak122 2 years ago
Dam it... I can't understand Russian :(
vdub350 2 years ago
its your problem
EmeraldJester 2 years ago
It is...
vdub350 2 years ago
yay... medieval total war II...
Tounushi 2 years ago
Cool, do you have else video?
13131313Paulo 2 years ago
thanks for being in english bro,.....
craveplanetcaravan 2 years ago
2lashachantladze
yeaaaaaaah? bigest fake? but ....but no .....coment please)))))) I think you just eneducated asshole, you know about russians nothing, урод грузинский.....
RusDigger 2 years ago
and by the way, the russian empire of many years later was built on the backs of the east slavic cities. modern russia was launched by muscovy, who only got its power from the monghols as a deal to collect taxes and tribute from the other slavic principalites for the khan.
so muscovy gets rich off of its neighbours doing the scab work for the mongol khans in return for a token overlordship of the other slavs.
not such a proud heroic way to found a nation really. and has been the USSR model
Euroslav 2 years ago
i would like to see where u got that from. your sources?
Uragan 2 years ago
Russia was not found after the end of the Mongol dynasty, and Muscovy launched attacks led by Dimitri Donskoi against Mongol Hordes on Don River, whilst being at the same level of pressure as other Eastern principalities.
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
Hmm... You've taken one aspect of the situation, hardly a unique thing about Moscow actually, and magnified it to encompass everything, which you then turn into a narrative of Russian expansion and political oppression. You're already more than halfway to writing a popular history that will sell millions in America!
You might want to try to be more analytical, though, if you want to pass high school history class.
Thunk00 2 years ago
@Euroslav I guess Canada was built on the backs of Canadian cities )) Tributes were payed by all principalities, including Moscow, which became dominant at that time. The great princess were appointed by the khan himself, nobody made deals like will rob our neighbours for you just dont touch us. If you want to express your russophobic attitude so much, try using some logic next time
urka666 1 year ago
so in reality, kievan rus is a medieval eastslavic state composed of ancient ukrainians, belarussians, and far eastern slavs (whos anscestors today have been greatly diluted by finns, magyars, tartars, mongols, turks, huns.... you name it,)
so lets not pretend that "mother russia" today has really anything to do with kievan rus, other than copying its culture and having its slavic language due to kievan rus's dominance in eastern europe.
russia=melting pot, not an insult, just the truth
Euroslav 2 years ago
I can smell your heavy scent of russophobia, but Kievan Rus was a compliation of the Rus' people...Russians, Ukrainains and Belorussians. You have yet to learn history Canadian scum!
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
Aha! What?! Rus WAS a people consisting of ural-Finnish, Norse and Varangian background, each having set their principalities in Eastern Europe!Kievan Rus', even as the name suggests, had the majority of Russian and Ukrainian ethenticity.
Ukrainian = Belorussian = Russian
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
The term Rus actually comes from the name of a group of Varangians, whose leader was invited to become prince of the Novgorod republic to protect it. His prestige was great enough that his sons were invited to become princes in many other Russian cities, to the point where most of Russia was ruled by the Rurikovich family, and though they assimilated into slavs within a few generations, their name "Rus" stuck. Kiev was simply the most glorious and powerful of the Russian states, the hegemon.
Thunk00 2 years ago
There is a theory that those 'Varangians' were Baltic Western Slavs actually came from lands of veneds that belong to Germany in present time.
sspiritus999 2 years ago
I personally buy the traditional theory, that they were Vikings, because that's where their names come from.
It's not that important. At that time, much of the Baltic Sea coast was covered by little tribes which spoke unique dialects and had a unique culture, most of which didn't stay in place for more than a few generations. Rurik and his Rus are probably not even closely linked with any modern nation, whatever the Swedes say. They were totally slavicized after a few generations anyway.
Thunk00 2 years ago
At the time of the Kiev's ascendancy, there was no difference between East Slavs. They all called themselves Russians, and lived in small, often electoral principalities, similar to the Greek city states before Alexander. They were united by culture and religion, where they all had a single metropolitan bishop. They were only pulled apart when Poland and Lithuania conquered many of the western states, and even then there was no formally recognized ethnic/language division until the XIX century.
Thunk00 2 years ago
>lets not pretend that "mother russia" today has really anything to do with kievan rus
What a nonsense... Guess Finns and Mongols have built Novgorod,Moscow and Saint Petersburg and copied Slavic language,orthodox religion and culture in our heads just because of Kievan Rus dominance?!What is the reason Chenghiz Khan isnt our national hero and Tatar language isnt our official?!
And what about Slavs of ancient Novgorod,Rostov,Ryazan,Murom,Yaroslavl,Suzdal? Did they all disappeared?
sspiritus999 2 years ago
@Euroslav yeah ))) thank you so much for telling us who we are ))) I guess its so obvious from the other side of the globe
urka666 1 year ago
and if any of you want to argue this, you dont stand a chance. just look up R1a1 the most common strand of DNA in slavs all around the world. very common in czech, slovak, poland, croatio, slovenia, ukraine, serbia, belarus.......... even hungary and east germany are full of this strand, the russians only have this common slavic DNA in the west (smolensk, vitebsk, orel, vyazma....) and areas around pskov-moscow- petersburg- and further east have been proven to have closer blood to finns &estonia
Euroslav 2 years ago
There is no genetically pure country in any famous part of Eurasia. That is all that genetic research can, at this point, tell us, and is something we also know from common sense.
Beyond that, genetic research is useless and unreliable, researchers are always contradicting each other because there is a huge amount of raw information, with no order so we can not, with current technology and understanding, figure out how to process it properly. Many researchers have a political agenda, anyway..
Thunk00 2 years ago
wow, the russians have impressed me. not only has this director falsely assumed that kievan rus was russia, but he fails to acknowledge that the lands of kievan rus were east slavic and filled with predecossors of the ukrainians and belarussians (they are independant states now, deal with it ivan.) the anscestors of modern "slavic" russians lived there too but most were on the eastern ouskirts and mixed with ural-finns. so infact, modern russia has far less claim to kievan rus than ukrain&belars
Euroslav 2 years ago
You might want to look up these terms:
Common history
Shared culture
Outdated racial theories
They're all relevant to your post, but you don't seem to understand them. You'd probably feel pretty offended if parts of your country suddenly declared independence, and I came in and used similar words about your country.
Thunk00 2 years ago
Russian history is the biggest fake. They lied always, and they lie today. They make themselves heros, but....no comment
lashachantladze 2 years ago
Обьясни в чём ложь?
MacMexaN 2 years ago
fuck you monkey. youd better suck - its your favourit style as always
Yoshka777 2 years ago
Comment removed
dancecosmic 2 years ago
dancecosmic----- Россия ето не плодовитая земля
2009stalker 2 years ago
В каком смысле ??
dancecosmic 2 years ago
well i d say
travelwarren 2 years ago
Украинцы это те Русские которых ебли и поляки и немцы и литовцы и они теберь называют себя великой хохлонацией)))))))))))))))
DoktoP1000 2 years ago
интересно а как по твоему должны выглядеть угро-финны (финны и венгры например)
да и какое ваше отношение к славянам? вы же почти все под турками были
Pyco0I0uJI 2 years ago
This looks nice, but I can't understand!!! Could you put some subs please....
ibrahim213 3 years ago
english please.
youxmejohn 3 years ago
man you can learn russian as weel,this will be good for you
travelwarren 2 years ago
you could have put subs since the title is in english!
unurautare2 3 years ago
nvm i posted on wrong video
gazzzo0 3 years ago
this is just a suggestion, is not supported by facts
gazzzo0 3 years ago
Ja voobshe ne ponimaiu v chem problema. Nado ubrat' orangevih i vse budet samechatelno.
Neujeli ne ponjatno chto amerika vsegda vsech kidaet pod konez. Ukrainzi, Grusia, Belorusia, Latvia, Polsha...da vsja Evropa Amerike pohuiu!!!
ConOrder 3 years ago
tak vot pochemu rasia takaia bliadskaia strana ! teper iasna vash pervii car bil po prosto ubliudkom sluniavim!!!
zgarblomi 3 years ago
Koraboros111
На счёт "неруси" ты не прав! Познай историю и станешь человеком любивым к народам русских.
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
Русские, украинцы и белорусы очень близкие по крови народы.. Наверное никакой разницы в генотипе нет вообще.. Просто Украина и Белоруссия некоторое время прожив под Речью Посполитой переняли некоторые ее особенности..
Nimaxpa 3 years ago
goody1984rambler
Не забывай что всю историю мы сражались, то против Польши, то против России и у нас небыло возможности построить централизованную власть. Хотя судя по сему опыту, нам нужно твёрдая рука - монархия. В России есть не формальная монархия.
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
В России нет на данный момент никакой монархии... Есть "централизованная демократия"
Что-то не помню как много Украина воевала с Россией... Помнится только сомнительная битва при Конотопе.. Если честно вообще украинцы как отдельный народ мне лично не очень представляются
Nimaxpa 3 years ago
Тоисть ГЛАВНОЙ БЫЛА НЕ РОССИЯ!!! и в итоге все пункты Украины были как раз украинскими!!!
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
скажи ты дрочишь на украинский учебник истории??
Pyco0I0uJI 2 years ago
Koraboros111
Чтото я не припоминаю когда и по какому поводу мы предали Киев??? До развала СССР была и УССР (тоисть Украина) и РСФСР (Россия) и другие социалистические республики которых Ленин обьединил против империализма и признал Россию теми же правами что и других республик.
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
Вообще-то Киев - наш город,который вы,предатели, захапали после развала СССР.Украина - это всё наши земли.Чем вы,малоросы,можете гордиться,кроме как тем,что Киев - часть вашей страны?Вы не Русь,а нерусь.
Koraboros111 3 years ago
Тем более галицкий князь начал битву без приказа. В той битве было три князя (Черниговский,Галицкий и Киевски). Как видишь, никем из вашей теперешней России и не пахло...
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
Конници у нас было мало восновном пешие а Монголы-лучшие лучники-наездники того времени. Даже если и Мстислав Романович Киевский пошел выручать Мстислава Удалого он бы мог загибнуть и тем самым оставить Киевское правление без князя...
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
Киевский князь не решился ударить во фланг чтобы спасти Галицького князя, было такое. потому что строй русичев стоял неправильно. Ты вообще представляешь какая там битва была??? 30 тис.монголо-татар и 80 тис. Русичев с половцями.
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
Ваш князь Юрий Долгорукий и ваше Владимиро-Суздальское княжество, которое отказало в помощи против Монголо-татар настоящей Руси-УКРАИНЕ! А то что ты говоришь что вокруг России все територии назывались "окраина" то это детский лепит...
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
Что ты несешь? В битве на Калке Киевский князь предал всех, так и не пустив в бой свои войска.
foman17 3 years ago
natoli4
твой возраст не отвечает твоему уму... только самый необразованый люббен будет такое отвечать....Тебе просто завидно что украинские територии всегда будут славнее в истории нежели Россия.
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
вот правильное выражение "украинские территории". потому что государства украина не было и не будет. то что есть сейчас - временное недоразумение. но собственно скоро это недоразумение наши политики сами и исправят
goody1984rambler 3 years ago
etat vizia bel ochin inziresnem
Phantome0007 3 years ago
Ruskie i ukrainci imeiut obshie slavianskie korni. I eti korni uhodiat v istoriu toje.
Poetomu hvatit vozmushiatsia.
vinniepuh 3 years ago
ya loblo rasio xD
Phantome0007 3 years ago
kakie naxuj korni? tebe tozhe mozgi promyli? ukraincy pojavilis' v period Pervoj Mirovoj s podachi nemeckoj i avstrijskoj razvedki, poskolku schitavshie sebja russkimi zhiteli Galitchiny oxotno pomogali russkim vojskam. Pravda za eto avstricy v konclagerjax ubili 150 tys galitchan, no komu oni nuzhny, nepravil'nye kakie-to ukraincy byli
natoli4 3 years ago
@vinniepuh Ya soglasen s toboi, tol'ko govorit' o ykraincah kak o ne rysskih schitayu ne pravel'no. Ykraincu (malorosu), rossiyane (velikorosu) i belorusu (belorosu) eto 1 etnos - rysskie. Slava Rusi!!!
NymphomanicWoman 10 months ago
Я не понимаю, зачем росияне забирают у нас, украинцев, нашу историю??? Это всё ложь! Потому что к Росие относится лиш Московия. А Новгород принадлежал Киеву!!!
FantazistaUK10 3 years ago
ty tupaja bljadina ukazhi mne xot' odno pis'mennoe dokazatelstvo suschestvovanija "ukraincev" ranee 16 veka!!! Pri Groznom terminom "ukraina" nazyvalas' ljubaja pogranichnaja territorija. V svoe vremja Ukrainoj byli zemli Orla i Tuly, poskolku granichili s volzhskimi xanstvami. Pozhe Vostochnoj Ukrainoj nazyvali (vnimanie!) Sibir'. Ili drevnie ukry esche i Sibir' obzhili v rannem paleolite?
natoli4 3 years ago
this is not russian history its Ukranian history
iBox87 3 years ago
а пишиш ты это тогда зачем по англиски?? и если там в летописях постоянно говорят руссы, стоит ли считать что все украинцы русские??
ILYAMURMANSK 3 years ago
SUBTITLES PLEASE !!!
arlsan 3 years ago
it's veri difekal, vera mani infomation
ILYAMURMANSK 3 years ago