@tnahurley Can you please explain what you mean to me, a moderately musical ignoramus? Are you referring to the sections that start with the diminished arpeggio at 1:28, which seem to ebb and flow? Is "detachment" the technical term for this? I certainly like the rhythmic emphasis on the beat during the first section.
@14Dundalk88: like your brain............. When can we see and hear your performance? Bach didn't give info about tempo, those things where added later like the Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis somewhere around 1950.
This is excellent music. Please do not dampen the experience by posting comments that don't praise the music--your comments aren't really going to change anyone's opinions about it.
Fantastic. Meeting of two geniuses in music. This interpretation is fresh and innovative, that I was really stuck. There is nobody like Gould, there is nobody like Bach.
@chengyanslc Mine too. And because this is the first version I heard, I can't listen to the more legato/heavier interpretations now without groaning inwardly a little, haha. I've always thought the staccato made the piece sound like falling raindrops.
Gould's detached way of playing this piece is outstanding. Sometimes stacatto and sometimes sustained melodic notes on the first and third beat was a genius idea. Slowing down at 0:58 confuse us about what's next, and the tension lasts wonderfully until 1:29. Here, the first four accentuated notes at the beginning of each bar was also genius. The part at 1:41 is finally what we waited for, the climax. The line at 1:56 is perfectly conducted. As usual, good job for your creativity Mr Gould!
otra joya musical que puede que a muy poca gente le interese, pero parense dos minutos a escuchar este preludio de bach interpretado por el gran glenn gould mediante un piano steinway.
I love this practice - this is how I practice this piece but I do it hands separately first at this tempo then at the intended speed. First staccato, as here, then legato.
@janmorez Composers regularly move to a different key, or add a seemingly out-of-place root note in the music; regardless, the majority of the piece is in C minor, thus the song is labeled with C minor.
@MrMaebell6 No I meant in bar 18 left hand 9th note, I play a Bb there instead of a C but I just checked it and it's a C. It's because I play this piece by heart that I unknowingly changed a note. I love the sound of the Bb there though, it really is a nice build-up to the Fm (not stating that Bach didn't do a good job or something lol)
@janmorez Ahh I see! Sorry for the misunderstanding. There are many interpretations of Bach's music and that is what i find amazing. Bach would probably cringe when he heard people playing his music. Lol
@idaspe Las composiciones de Bach son esplendidas, variables, generan muchos sentimientos en una sola composicion, la apreciasion de la musica no esta en escuchar, sino en saber oir, no puedes dar una opinion tal, como si fuese algo objetivo, por ejemplo para mi como cientos de miles mas, esta obra es fantastica, admirable, y mas que agradable al oido, lo unico que te pido es que al menos hagas la aclaracion que es una opinion subjetiva y personal, y no lo menciones como algo cierto. Saludos.
@TheM3etalWolf Ante todo, valoro MUCHÍSIMO la educación que tenés, porque es lo que menos abunda por estos parajes. Por supuesto que la obra de Bach es inmensamente rica, y este preludio es de lo más exquisito. Me parece horrible la interpretación-y claro que es mi opinión, y como tal, subjetiva- , porque considero que está escrito para tocarse, como mínimo, al doble de velocidad.
@TheM3etalWolf Por repetir todo y por ser armónicamente "estático" si se tarda en ejecutar. Una elección de tiempo "agitado" describiría, además, la pasión irrefrenable típica de do menor. Pasión a la que -creo- Bach alude con este tipo de ejecución. Saludos
@idaspe La verdad, el sentimiento es reciproco, ya me esperaba una respuesta con alguna vulgaridad (no es por nada personal, sino que es ya tan regular en sitios de opinion publica como lo es Youtube.), por lo menos aun queda gente con modales y buen gusto, lamento no haber interpretado bien tu comentario, crei que te referias a la obra en si y no la interpretacion, la verdad es que en eso estoy si muy de acuerdo, bueno, la verdad un gusto, hasta pronto.
@TheM3etalWolf Perfecto ejemplo de cómo dos personas inicialmente en desacuerdo pueden aclarar sus pareceres mediante el diálogo y sin ofenderse..., y de hecho terminar viendo que piensan igual. La versión al clave de este preludio de Ton Koopman es impecable, te la recomiendo. Saludos :o)
"There is so much talk about music, and so little is really said. I do not think words are at all adequate for the subject, and if I found they were, I should end by writing no more music."
Felix Mendelssohn
If you don't like the interpretation, move on to another version but please; don't add more text pollution. In other words, stfu and listen. I know. It's scary. You might actually have to feel something instead of spouting off your personal philosophy, but I promise it's worth it.
@clevernickname70 I agree, but stfu yourself. If anything, youtube is a meeting ground precisely for one's "personal philosophy", which is what makes it such a appalling place where the luxury of anonymity changes the "personal philosophy" to cascades of primitive, insulting, judging, and unfiltered thoughts. Though that works both ways; one can also play the role of authority, telling others what to do. What's more flattering?
You're arguing semantics. My point was that his talent and genius were not "God-given". Saying such a ridiculous thing is a selfish insult to any performer who is seen as a "genius". Also, typing your words in all caps does not help your argument.
Undoubtedly he is thumbing his nose at all of us... and that's what makes it beautiful... Not that he is in itself... but that his little game of getting people who take themselves or this too seriously get all indignant about it...
The older I get, the more Glenn Gould's affected, "LOOK AT ME, WORLD, AIN'T I JUST THE MOST AMAZING THING YOU EVER HEARD?" approach to musical interpretation strikes me as unworthy of the immense talent God gave him.
He is mentally thumbing his nose at you when he pulls stuff like this, believe me.
Believe you? Why, because you're older? I don't care if gave the audience the middle finger every time he was done performing. He was an amazing pianist and one was of the greatest Bach interpreters of the 20th century. Blah on you, Sir. :D
He was like the girl with the curl right in the middle of her forehead.
When he was good, he was very very good
But when he was bad, he was horrid.
He was, of course, a great genius, but possessed by the Imp of the Perverse much of the time.
After he became famous, he amused himself by "testing" the critics (and his audiences) to see just how much it would take before someone would cry out, "But he has nothing on!" as the little child did in the famous fairy tale about the duped emperor.
@Pischnaholic He made his own talent by working incredibly hard his entire life. "God" (Christian God I assume) did not give him talent. As far as his interpretation is concerned, the sound that he achieved is much more akin to that of a harpsichord than of a piano which would be far more historically accurate anyway.
No one MAKES talent. One can DEVELOP talent if it is given, but one cannot CREATE a talent not already there. Talent is INNATE. Either you have it or you don't.
Gould possessed a very high degree of God-given genius. He performed the Beethoven 4th concerto at age 13. The entire keyboard literature was child's play to him from a very early age.
That he often made decidedly PERVERSE use of his God-given abilities shows a marked defect in his character -- not as a "talent" but as a human being.
@gacktooo "God-given," i.e., he was born with a certain something that others do not possess and could not possess no matter how much they worked at it. Call it genetic if you prefer.
You atheists/agnostics are as dumb as shit, but unfortunately you can't use the excuse that you were born that way--you are ignorant in understanding metaphors and symbolism due to intellectual laziness, conceit, closed-mindedness, and a self-imposed inability to see beyond the surface layer.
La plupart des gens ne comprennent pas Bach mais Glenn Gould lui l'a compris car il est née pour jouer Bach. Clarté, Touché imparable et magnifique, on entend tout et cela élève l'esprit
theres something bothering me about not seeing the guy, like this to me takes out the more human aspect of piano playing in the first place, just seeing the piano move itself, is very well done, idk if its hidden modern abstract thinking in the works but consider whoever got this recoding to be visual genius
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yes. A pointedly bizarre interpretation. I'd love it if only it weren't so ugly. It's a put-on like so many things he recorded after he became justifiably famous for his early work.
This is my favorite version by far. Tempo and articulation are very unique. Most play it faster and legato, whereas Glenn slows it down and executes a perfect portamento. Brilliant.
Whether or not I like Gould is irrelevant to this comment; you can't tell someone to have a positive opinion of someone else just because you think they're important.
This interpretation allows us to be pulled in by the piece in an emotional turmoil and reverence. Playing it faster would replace the somber feeling with an excitable and weaker one. Any slower, and we would not feel the opposing tension that it creates within that makes this version so unforgettable.
to play as fast as you can is not all in music. in my opinion its a very good interpretation. I think Bach didnt wrote this to play it in hyperspeed..
wrong. his interpretation is brilliant, he just keeps us focused on emotions and you can listen into great bach's harmony. i'm sad that there are a lot of people with opinion "fast equal good".
totally agree with shark attacks, don't feed the troll people. Emperor MIKI is just, as he said, a joker, so why bother replying? And for goodness' sake, why post such random, mindless, idiotic and irrelevant comments on this beautiful baroque piece??
Umm.. what the hell is homosexual agenda, muslims, crypto-satanists, satanists, atheists and I haven't read the bible yet so please stop posting discussion about .. homosexual agenda.. in Glenn Gould plays Prelude in C minor, please don't.
Your comments on this video are the dumbest I've ever seen, and what's even dumber is the fact that I'm actually responding to it. Why did you start this crazy redneck nazi debate in this place anyways? Why aren't you talking about how Glenn Gould is the man and how awesome this piece is?
I love the tempo! It's perfect, if you have a look at the fact that at Bach's time the harpsichord was the usual keyboard instrument. If you play it too fast - as the most people of the youtube-community do - on that instrument it's just unpleasant noise. And also think of the first Praeludium! All the compositions in WK stand in context to eachother. Just imagine Praeludium I played so fast as the most of us do it with Praeludium II. Horrible!
the CD 318....just finished katie hafner's book <3
bigcalamaro 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my version of Bach's Prelude in C for piano.
Comments and subscriptions welcome.
Just click my link to hear my channel.
markymark251 2 weeks ago
Can't believe he's playing the sixteenths detached. Absolutely wonderful
tnahurley 3 weeks ago
@tnahurley Can you please explain what you mean to me, a moderately musical ignoramus? Are you referring to the sections that start with the diminished arpeggio at 1:28, which seem to ebb and flow? Is "detachment" the technical term for this? I certainly like the rhythmic emphasis on the beat during the first section.
mahajohn 1 week ago
@ancelotcastor Yes! Do you mean Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2? That is a wonderful song, I first heard it in one of the Marx Brother's movies :)
gemskii42 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fucking retarded low brain who can't play faster......
shanyusama 4 months ago
i like the fast version but this interpretation is really cool too
thenamesfrancisco 4 months ago
His staccato (sp?) is so perfect, and since he plays it this way, you can really tell how pefectly synced his hands are all throughout. Perfect. :)
18mattdamon 4 months ago in playlist Piano Lessons, and Fun
This just reminds me of that old Tom and Jerry episode called cat concerto or something. Love it.
zdeminador 5 months ago
@zdeminador search for Liszt's rhapsody Nª2
ancelotcastor 5 months ago
This is a great video! And he's playing slowly for once!
Greywingg 5 months ago
worth his weight in gould!
robertrobin10 5 months ago 3
@robertrobin10
I'm sorry. As much as I approve your taste in music, your taste in puns is just AWFUL.
MrShadyface 2 months ago
why is too slow?
HeeCat00 6 months ago
too slow tempo
aghaanantyab 6 months ago
Awesomely played, awesomely edited. I bow to this superior piece.
Phacias 6 months ago
Weird...
IBRAHIMpianist 6 months ago
Am I the only one bobbing my head when I listen to more than 10 seconds of this prelude ?
TheIncredibleGodzy 7 months ago 16
@TheIncredibleGodzy no way.... your not alone...
Hamporkcheese 3 months ago
I have to play some Caves of Thor when I hear this
BagOfMagicFood 4 weeks ago
too slow
14Dundalk88 7 months ago
@14Dundalk88: like your brain............. When can we see and hear your performance? Bach didn't give info about tempo, those things where added later like the Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis somewhere around 1950.
lekkerbekje 7 months ago
Just one word: GREAT... and thanks for posting. Wowwww...!!!
Nibelungenfrau 8 months ago
fantastico Glenn Gould riesce a rappresentare bach in tutta la sua essenza
stebarbieri 8 months ago
This is excellent music. Please do not dampen the experience by posting comments that don't praise the music--your comments aren't really going to change anyone's opinions about it.
baroque500 9 months ago
@baroque500 no-one's making you read. some of us do more than make approving noises
CheekyVimto08 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
never once see him
thenotoriousadin 9 months ago
@thenotoriousadin that's because he died
mistasandrews 5 months ago
More word pollution!
Otterist 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh my god!
The man killed COMPLETELY the music of Bach.
I didn't believe it could be done!
lykigos 10 months ago
At last ! Creativity !
Withergarde 1 year ago
The hammers going up and down are cute! :)
DreamsontheWater 1 year ago 2
@DreamsontheWater like they were dancing, right?
Jackpotur 11 months ago
@Jackpotur Yeah, or, I don't know, they are just calmly bobbing up and down!
DreamsontheWater 11 months ago
Come on, who puts a thumb down to Bach?
PhysicalsimForever 1 year ago
@PhysicalsimForever right? who ARE these people (in seinfeld voice)
sleazebee 11 months ago
@PhysicalsimForever I'm afraid just to think of it
Jackpotur 11 months ago
@PhysicalsimForever It might not necessarily be to Bach, but to Gould's lackluster interpretation.
TheIcedRealm 11 months ago
Fantastic. Meeting of two geniuses in music. This interpretation is fresh and innovative, that I was really stuck. There is nobody like Gould, there is nobody like Bach.
dreemer777 1 year ago
I played this blind folded in my school talent show. lovely piece by such an amazing pianist.
albinominotaur 1 year ago
The record is Gould, but not the video.
Starwalker6978 1 year ago
In my opinion it's THE BEST interpretation of that piece made on piano!
Generally speaking, as regards playing Bach on piano, in my opinion Glenn Gould was the best.
chiz161190 1 year ago
This is my favorite piece in WTC.
I want to describe this as "explosive"
chengyanslc 1 year ago
@chengyanslc Mine too. And because this is the first version I heard, I can't listen to the more legato/heavier interpretations now without groaning inwardly a little, haha. I've always thought the staccato made the piece sound like falling raindrops.
thequantumcollapse 1 year ago
Meraviglioso!!!!!!!
galaxian06 1 year ago
Where are all the grunts and groans?? ^_^
tubez4321 1 year ago
I LOVE THIS TEMPO
jazzpsalti 1 year ago
I'm learning this on guitar as a duet it's sooooo nice but soooooooooooooooo difficult lol
talalesam 1 year ago
Gould's interpretation raises our attention to a lot of things that are happening on the score, it's like having simultaneously a lecture about it.
nihil1 1 year ago
@nihil1
Interesting. Say more.
cwhig 1 year ago
@nihil1 Yes indeed. Gould didn't play music, he explained music. But the laguage he used for his explanations was music instead of words.
So many people are confused about that issue. :O))
I loved your point of vue and couldn't stop from pushing it a little bit further.
rouelibre1 1 year ago
Lovely. Just lovely.
parus55 1 year ago 33
Gould's detached way of playing this piece is outstanding. Sometimes stacatto and sometimes sustained melodic notes on the first and third beat was a genius idea. Slowing down at 0:58 confuse us about what's next, and the tension lasts wonderfully until 1:29. Here, the first four accentuated notes at the beginning of each bar was also genius. The part at 1:41 is finally what we waited for, the climax. The line at 1:56 is perfectly conducted. As usual, good job for your creativity Mr Gould!
Edou467 1 year ago 5
Is piano not afterall, a strings instrument?
dametalbasser 1 year ago
@dametalbasser no, its percussion.
ITSWTFBOOMTIME 1 year ago
@ITSWTFBOOMTIME No, it's both
dredeye 1 year ago
@ITSWTFBOOMTIME What makes Iogo evil? some people ask. I never ask.
mrwarhol 1 year ago
otra joya musical que puede que a muy poca gente le interese, pero parense dos minutos a escuchar este preludio de bach interpretado por el gran glenn gould mediante un piano steinway.
MrQuequestring 1 year ago
Best Version!
henrymbida 1 year ago
C minor is such a beautifully stormy key.
OriginalBasaliskos 1 year ago 2
@OriginalBasaliskos
und drang-y
MousikeTechne 1 year ago
it's really annoying i don't have perfect pitch it would be really useful to play this piece
aluini 1 year ago
I love this prelude i played it for my school`s Anniversary :)
MetalAge19 1 year ago
I love this practice - this is how I practice this piece but I do it hands separately first at this tempo then at the intended speed. First staccato, as here, then legato.
stockcar5472 1 year ago
you should see the Manuel Huerga film "Les Variacions Gould".
mandril1970 1 year ago
toooo slow.....................
abracadabra324 1 year ago
Isn't it a Bb instead of a C at 1:09 ?
janmorez 1 year ago
@janmorez Composers regularly move to a different key, or add a seemingly out-of-place root note in the music; regardless, the majority of the piece is in C minor, thus the song is labeled with C minor.
MrMaebell6 1 year ago
@MrMaebell6 No I meant in bar 18 left hand 9th note, I play a Bb there instead of a C but I just checked it and it's a C. It's because I play this piece by heart that I unknowingly changed a note. I love the sound of the Bb there though, it really is a nice build-up to the Fm (not stating that Bach didn't do a good job or something lol)
janmorez 1 year ago
@janmorez Ahh I see! Sorry for the misunderstanding. There are many interpretations of Bach's music and that is what i find amazing. Bach would probably cringe when he heard people playing his music. Lol
MrMaebell6 1 year ago
check this outttttttttttttttt
watch?v=Y8DMxKAe-aM
freddiehangoler 1 year ago
Great Cinematography!
ke7hbi 1 year ago
very cool
ragtimest 1 year ago
One word to describe this clip: "Cinema". . . Perfect marriage between image and sound. Thanks for sharing it.
brunofelix20 1 year ago
Nice :)
lisa850331 1 year ago
Horrible...
idaspe 1 year ago
@idaspe Las composiciones de Bach son esplendidas, variables, generan muchos sentimientos en una sola composicion, la apreciasion de la musica no esta en escuchar, sino en saber oir, no puedes dar una opinion tal, como si fuese algo objetivo, por ejemplo para mi como cientos de miles mas, esta obra es fantastica, admirable, y mas que agradable al oido, lo unico que te pido es que al menos hagas la aclaracion que es una opinion subjetiva y personal, y no lo menciones como algo cierto. Saludos.
TheM3etalWolf 1 year ago
@TheM3etalWolf Ante todo, valoro MUCHÍSIMO la educación que tenés, porque es lo que menos abunda por estos parajes. Por supuesto que la obra de Bach es inmensamente rica, y este preludio es de lo más exquisito. Me parece horrible la interpretación-y claro que es mi opinión, y como tal, subjetiva- , porque considero que está escrito para tocarse, como mínimo, al doble de velocidad.
idaspe 1 year ago
@TheM3etalWolf Por repetir todo y por ser armónicamente "estático" si se tarda en ejecutar. Una elección de tiempo "agitado" describiría, además, la pasión irrefrenable típica de do menor. Pasión a la que -creo- Bach alude con este tipo de ejecución. Saludos
idaspe 1 year ago
@idaspe La verdad, el sentimiento es reciproco, ya me esperaba una respuesta con alguna vulgaridad (no es por nada personal, sino que es ya tan regular en sitios de opinion publica como lo es Youtube.), por lo menos aun queda gente con modales y buen gusto, lamento no haber interpretado bien tu comentario, crei que te referias a la obra en si y no la interpretacion, la verdad es que en eso estoy si muy de acuerdo, bueno, la verdad un gusto, hasta pronto.
TheM3etalWolf 1 year ago
Comment removed
idaspe 1 year ago
@TheM3etalWolf Perfecto ejemplo de cómo dos personas inicialmente en desacuerdo pueden aclarar sus pareceres mediante el diálogo y sin ofenderse..., y de hecho terminar viendo que piensan igual. La versión al clave de este preludio de Ton Koopman es impecable, te la recomiendo. Saludos :o)
idaspe 1 year ago
damn, he played the hardest part super fast
ShipsAreBurned 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
divvy1400yam600: I'm interested in seeing your video demonstrating your superior interpretation. Show us.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
divvy1400yam600: I would be interested in seeing your video, demonstrating your superior interpretation.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
divvy1400yam600: I would be interested in seeing your video demonstrating your superior interpretation.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
"There is so much talk about music, and so little is really said. I do not think words are at all adequate for the subject, and if I found they were, I should end by writing no more music."
Felix Mendelssohn
If you don't like the interpretation, move on to another version but please; don't add more text pollution. In other words, stfu and listen. I know. It's scary. You might actually have to feel something instead of spouting off your personal philosophy, but I promise it's worth it.
clevernickname70 1 year ago 103
@clevernickname70 +9999... (infinite)
ultrabot90 1 year ago
@clevernickname70 I agree, but stfu yourself. If anything, youtube is a meeting ground precisely for one's "personal philosophy", which is what makes it such a appalling place where the luxury of anonymity changes the "personal philosophy" to cascades of primitive, insulting, judging, and unfiltered thoughts. Though that works both ways; one can also play the role of authority, telling others what to do. What's more flattering?
Revan2021 1 year ago
@clevernickname70 bravo,
Jackpotur 11 months ago
@clevernickname70 some people can do both.
EMPERORMIKI 11 months ago
@clevernickname70 you talk too much !
jsilence418 9 months ago
@clevernickname70 no-one's making you scroll down and read
CheekyVimto08 6 months ago
@clevernickname70 take your own advice.
EMPERORMIKI 6 months ago
@clevernickname70 You are genius. You literally just changed my outlook on music.
MadCoSnareLine 4 months ago
I think this is a deliberately idiosyncratic interpretation.
Surely it should be less plodding and tending towards staccato,
I would prefer to hear smoother and faster... as it becomes towards the end..
divvy1400yam600 1 year ago
You're arguing semantics. My point was that his talent and genius were not "God-given". Saying such a ridiculous thing is a selfish insult to any performer who is seen as a "genius". Also, typing your words in all caps does not help your argument.
evifnoskcaj 1 year ago
Undoubtedly he is thumbing his nose at all of us... and that's what makes it beautiful... Not that he is in itself... but that his little game of getting people who take themselves or this too seriously get all indignant about it...
n00bies1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The older I get, the more Glenn Gould's affected, "LOOK AT ME, WORLD, AIN'T I JUST THE MOST AMAZING THING YOU EVER HEARD?" approach to musical interpretation strikes me as unworthy of the immense talent God gave him.
He is mentally thumbing his nose at you when he pulls stuff like this, believe me.
Pischnaholic 1 year ago
Believe you? Why, because you're older? I don't care if gave the audience the middle finger every time he was done performing. He was an amazing pianist and one was of the greatest Bach interpreters of the 20th century. Blah on you, Sir. :D
rewt5 1 year ago
He was like the girl with the curl right in the middle of her forehead.
When he was good, he was very very good
But when he was bad, he was horrid.
He was, of course, a great genius, but possessed by the Imp of the Perverse much of the time.
After he became famous, he amused himself by "testing" the critics (and his audiences) to see just how much it would take before someone would cry out, "But he has nothing on!" as the little child did in the famous fairy tale about the duped emperor.
Pischnaholic 1 year ago
Well you clearly were the fatass girl no one gave a shit about.
And this is very very good--I find it to be anyway.
God forbid anyone test the critics or the audience--things are fine the way they are.
EMPERORMIKI 1 year ago
@Pischnaholic He made his own talent by working incredibly hard his entire life. "God" (Christian God I assume) did not give him talent. As far as his interpretation is concerned, the sound that he achieved is much more akin to that of a harpsichord than of a piano which would be far more historically accurate anyway.
evifnoskcaj 1 year ago
No one MAKES talent. One can DEVELOP talent if it is given, but one cannot CREATE a talent not already there. Talent is INNATE. Either you have it or you don't.
Gould possessed a very high degree of God-given genius. He performed the Beethoven 4th concerto at age 13. The entire keyboard literature was child's play to him from a very early age.
That he often made decidedly PERVERSE use of his God-given abilities shows a marked defect in his character -- not as a "talent" but as a human being.
Pischnaholic 1 year ago
@Pischnaholic there is no 'god'
He and his hands played this piece of incredible music. Give him the credit.
gacktooo 1 year ago
@gacktooo "God-given," i.e., he was born with a certain something that others do not possess and could not possess no matter how much they worked at it. Call it genetic if you prefer.
You atheists/agnostics are as dumb as shit, but unfortunately you can't use the excuse that you were born that way--you are ignorant in understanding metaphors and symbolism due to intellectual laziness, conceit, closed-mindedness, and a self-imposed inability to see beyond the surface layer.
MaestroTJS 1 year ago
@MaestroTJS Nice overgeneralization bro.
raiden098 1 year ago
Comment removed
MaestroTJS 1 year ago
@raiden098 When I come across enough with a different mentality, I'll change my stereotype and get back to you.
Thanks, bro.
I will say, though, that literalist believers are not much better.
MaestroTJS 1 year ago
La plupart des gens ne comprennent pas Bach mais Glenn Gould lui l'a compris car il est née pour jouer Bach. Clarté, Touché imparable et magnifique, on entend tout et cela élève l'esprit
Lethearfuck 1 year ago 4
it could be any one really could be stevie wonder playing bach
alilapointe1 1 year ago
theres something bothering me about not seeing the guy, like this to me takes out the more human aspect of piano playing in the first place, just seeing the piano move itself, is very well done, idk if its hidden modern abstract thinking in the works but consider whoever got this recoding to be visual genius
64wulf 2 years ago
this is good one.
nocturn9999 2 years ago
OMG, jush show us beeping Glenn!!
alexbyehi 2 years ago
trop lent !!!
pierrefranconi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes. A pointedly bizarre interpretation. I'd love it if only it weren't so ugly. It's a put-on like so many things he recorded after he became justifiably famous for his early work.
Pischnaholic 1 year ago
Comment removed
pierrefranconi 2 years ago
normalement ça va beaucop plus vite mais il fait ce qu'il veut^^
Pianishh 2 years ago
@Pianishh toutefois, je voudrais savoir les raisons pour lesquelles il joue ce prelude comme ca. Je suis sûr qu'il a des bonnes raisons...
datatransfers667 2 years ago
This is one of my favorite songs to play.
tiffiness 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this clip sucks
Liptonater 2 years ago
Enchanting! So much music! We're truly blessed . . .
jimenezsnyder 2 years ago
this is a player piano right? this doesnt sound like gould's touch
onxtcz 2 years ago
This is my favorite version by far. Tempo and articulation are very unique. Most play it faster and legato, whereas Glenn slows it down and executes a perfect portamento. Brilliant.
sunburstflame 2 years ago
portamento? wtf you talkin' bout?
UncleC1025 2 years ago
lol
onxtcz 2 years ago
I'd like to hear portamento on piano :D
MaJJ007 2 years ago
portato, my bad.
sunburstflame 2 years ago
Such a great performance by Glenn! And the wonder is he, unlike many pianists, plays the sixteenth notes staccato.
colfranz1278 2 years ago
Beautifully executed! Many thanks.
psandbergnz 2 years ago
yeah its gould... I have this recording.. I'm guessing they mastered the sound, and the sound is generally different when uploaded onto youtube.
Ravel87 2 years ago
not sure if this is really Gould....hes been dead for more than 26 years...this vid sounds really new..
j8kn9 2 years ago
playing is him, vid probably isnt. like most of the 32 short films,
gr0mithtimon 2 years ago 2
Oh, How nice !
I love this plyaing.
grennflog 2 years ago
gould was a genius, a bit weird though.
it sounds good slower! ;-)
OliNelson1819 2 years ago 2
Great, but definately prefer it faster.. and on a harpsichord :)
TheFowlyetti 2 years ago
You listen to it however Glenn Gould wants to play it and you'll like it goddammit. It's fucking Glenn Gould.
ohlordbabyjesus 2 years ago
Whether or not I like Gould is irrelevant to this comment; you can't tell someone to have a positive opinion of someone else just because you think they're important.
davidgray2 2 years ago
@davidgray2
okay. but when the ghost of glenn gould comes to torment you for the rest of your waking days, don't say I didn't try to warn you.
ohlordbabyjesus 2 years ago
Yes well I think he'd be laughing with me because I was only trying to piss off his devout disciples. Seems I succeeded!
davidgray2 2 years ago
I think Jesus is laughing harder.
EMPERORMIKI 2 years ago 2
Hear, hear!
Friendulum 2 years ago
i love it
CarryFlag8 2 years ago
Why don't they show Glenn Gould in this clip?
HerrWarja 2 years ago 2
I love this! Makes me want to learn it!
thinkgreenlovepurple 2 years ago
This sounds awesome on the organ.
jobw87 2 years ago
This interpretation allows us to be pulled in by the piece in an emotional turmoil and reverence. Playing it faster would replace the somber feeling with an excitable and weaker one. Any slower, and we would not feel the opposing tension that it creates within that makes this version so unforgettable.
VelusDarkbind 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very slow in my opinion.
If you play it slow you lose the touch of this piece...Imo you should play it fast or not play at all.
shapiraavi 2 years ago
to play as fast as you can is not all in music. in my opinion its a very good interpretation. I think Bach didnt wrote this to play it in hyperspeed..
explosionmonty 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
kcostell 2 years ago
wrong. his interpretation is brilliant, he just keeps us focused on emotions and you can listen into great bach's harmony. i'm sad that there are a lot of people with opinion "fast equal good".
Jacu91 2 years ago
Yes well the better pianist you are the faster you can play. That's because your muscles are trained better.
davidgray2 2 years ago
my god. i cannot get this out of my head.
clevernickname70 2 years ago 22
PRECIOSO!!! nadie podria hacerlo mejor.
ALGER685 2 years ago
Someone will be able better ?...
Gusakov 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Too slow
saulboyjt 2 years ago
Lol-interesting, I wanted to see his fingerings, but whatever
DangerDucking 2 years ago
Schinken.
steve0ms 2 years ago
Beautiful performance of a beautiful peice! Really cool how they showed the mechanics of the piano as he played. =]
TraeBudde 2 years ago 2
totally agree with shark attacks, don't feed the troll people. Emperor MIKI is just, as he said, a joker, so why bother replying? And for goodness' sake, why post such random, mindless, idiotic and irrelevant comments on this beautiful baroque piece??
enzobg00d 2 years ago
its incomplete, !
KamaMaggot 2 years ago
Really cool video!
TwelfthRoot2 2 years ago
Guys don't feed the troll..
btw I love this song.
Sh4rk4ttacks 2 years ago 3
Umm.. what the hell is homosexual agenda, muslims, crypto-satanists, satanists, atheists and I haven't read the bible yet so please stop posting discussion about .. homosexual agenda.. in Glenn Gould plays Prelude in C minor, please don't.
kknots 2 years ago 2
Your comments on this video are the dumbest I've ever seen, and what's even dumber is the fact that I'm actually responding to it. Why did you start this crazy redneck nazi debate in this place anyways? Why aren't you talking about how Glenn Gould is the man and how awesome this piece is?
danielramjattan 2 years ago
lol
winnyokly 2 years ago
Glenn Gould a legend it is the best Pianist of the world and the Prelude -is Perfect.
niyattu 2 years ago
From "32 Short FILMS About Glenn Gould," from the same people who did "The Red Violin."
bradleighstockwell 2 years ago
I love the tempo! It's perfect, if you have a look at the fact that at Bach's time the harpsichord was the usual keyboard instrument. If you play it too fast - as the most people of the youtube-community do - on that instrument it's just unpleasant noise. And also think of the first Praeludium! All the compositions in WK stand in context to eachother. Just imagine Praeludium I played so fast as the most of us do it with Praeludium II. Horrible!
Yag0o 2 years ago
brilliant!
darequi 2 years ago 4
what is the machine in the film?
ubbddu 2 years ago
Well, it's a very rare and unknown apparate called... a piano! ^^
These are the small hammers hitting the strings and producing the sound.
Vlaanderson 2 years ago 31
oh my...
so its not a gigantic loom after all,
there - a theory gone.
thanks you civilized one! lol.
ubbddu 2 years ago
xD! Well I must admit, it could be a loom!
But if you watch 1:30 you can see "Steinway" written on the mounting! :D
Vlaanderson 2 years ago 13
Comment removed
laportetroite 2 years ago
aaaaaaaaahaaa
IAmLostWithoutYou 2 years ago 2
I think it's a fridge.
105Na1260 2 years ago
Super performance... I really love the video
SparkleSong84 2 years ago