@SuzLa1 God only knows. If you went to your local police now and told them the real ripper was seen down the road they would laugh at you. They just dont want to know because they know that people are fitted up all the time so that they close an outstanding case, especially if it is high profile.
If you and I were the real Birmingham bombers and went into the Bham police to confess, guess what they would say to us? F... off We know who done it.
Just bought a couple of great dvds on the matter from
w w w . y o r k s h i r e r i p p e r .n e t
One is six hours long and the other about five.Loads of different documentaries Has tape recordings of Sutcliffe on there.Strange how such a man has such a softly spoken voice
.All the confessions from the hoaxer John Humble at the police station too.Very informative dvds.
if you check out my website yorkshireripper with dotcom after it, you will see the evidence that proves beyond any doubt the killings that Sutcliffe did. He also was responsible for all the assaults most of which were later put in as Ripper assaults but prior to his arrest they were outside the ripper frame. As Ron Warren confirms police knew there was a nutter out there trying to copy the Ripper. That nutter turned out to be Sutcliffe.thats why there are so many unanswered questions about him.
weird coincidence o'gara that you think sutcliffe only murdered 4 but comitted all the assaults- pack it in you tool, you've been at this game too long.
The evidence is clear. Most of the women assaulted by Sutcliffe with a stone in a sock described him and recognised him after his arrest.
Prior to his arrest most of his assaults were NOT in the Ripper frame but they brought them in at that stage. The Ripper left no survivor. Three hammer blows to penetrate the skull while Sutcliffe had 13 blows.
The copycat killer couldnt match the ferocity of the Ripper. You need to study the case before making an ass of yourself. It wasnt a count game.
This is common knowledge. The Preston victim was murdered by a man who was a B-secreter (less than 6% of the male population). Sutcliffe, although he had nothing to lose, denied he was the killer in that case. The problem was that the Sunderland letters were also written by a B-secreter, which led the police to chase a complete red herring for years.
It was freely admitted amongst police officers during 1980 that there was a copycat killer involved. It started with the murder of Yvonne Pearson in Bradford and they stated then that it was a copycat killer. That copycat killer was Sutcliffe and he eventually comitted three more murders and all the assaults and was eliminated 12 times by blood analysis and his teeth pattern. However he confessed to the lot and that made him the ripper for a defeated police force.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sutcliffe is a hero he didnt kill human beings he only killed prostitutes. Release the man and give him a knighthood for getting the pros off the street Sir Peter Sutcliffe
@prankmasterjph You're a retard. He was a sick pervert who went for any easy prey and wore a cut off jumper on his legs so he could kneel while he masturbated. It was just that he was so ugly that he could only get prostitutes in his car, but he attacked many more types by hitting them from behind.
ron warren god rest him,could say whatever he wants,without facts,evidence,it means nothing. you could write and probably sell a book called"lady diana was an alien"people will read it,some might even believe it,but like youre book,its pure fantasy.
Mr Warren was an elected county councillor and was deputy chairman of the West Yorkshire Police authority during the hunt for the Ripper. He and the other members were told many times by the top brass police that there were two different killers involved. Sutcliffe was already eliminated as the Ripper then because they wanted to get the main man who was blood group B and had a large gap in his teeth. Nobody wanted a copycat killer, a nutter but thats what they got in the end.
Why some people stamp their ignorance in poorly constructed comments is beyond me. We all complain about the police force's competency when dealing with crime but accept it as truth whenever a crime is wrapped up.
Added to this, it's impossible that anyone in this day & age would ever confess to a crime with which they did not commit right???
Sutcliffe was not the Ripper. He was a copycat killer who had committed 4 of the murders and all the assaults. He confessed to all the murders because they offered him no trial and ten years in the mental home.
you're biting nothing my friend because you havent got the brains to bite anything.
the Ripper murders were well documented and the evidence was well exposed to the public. Sutcliffe was eliminated how many times?
before they got a confession out of him. The Real Ripper is not a fool and he knew that the cops would eventually do that to the lunatic who was copying his murders.Thats why he was writing to them. He took credit for Sutcliffe's murders and they knew the letters came from the ripper
Absolute bollocks. You're nothing but another conspiracy nutcase who wouldn't accept when he's wrong because you've invested too much time in this crap. Would you like a new tinfoil hat for xmas?
So where is this Billy Tracy now, if he exists?
SuzLa1 1 year ago
@SuzLa1 God only knows. If you went to your local police now and told them the real ripper was seen down the road they would laugh at you. They just dont want to know because they know that people are fitted up all the time so that they close an outstanding case, especially if it is high profile.
If you and I were the real Birmingham bombers and went into the Bham police to confess, guess what they would say to us? F... off We know who done it.
noelogaraa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just bought a couple of great dvds on the matter from
w w w . y o r k s h i r e r i p p e r .n e t
One is six hours long and the other about five.Loads of different documentaries Has tape recordings of Sutcliffe on there.Strange how such a man has such a softly spoken voice
.All the confessions from the hoaxer John Humble at the police station too.Very informative dvds.
SuperHatemail 1 year ago
Just to refresh my memory Noel, which victims do you believe were Sutcliffes?
densthedaddy1 2 years ago
if you check out my website yorkshireripper with dotcom after it, you will see the evidence that proves beyond any doubt the killings that Sutcliffe did. He also was responsible for all the assaults most of which were later put in as Ripper assaults but prior to his arrest they were outside the ripper frame. As Ron Warren confirms police knew there was a nutter out there trying to copy the Ripper. That nutter turned out to be Sutcliffe.thats why there are so many unanswered questions about him.
noelogaraa 2 years ago
yes of course noel
benskiboy 2 years ago
weird coincidence o'gara that you think sutcliffe only murdered 4 but comitted all the assaults- pack it in you tool, you've been at this game too long.
benskiboy 2 years ago 3
The evidence is clear. Most of the women assaulted by Sutcliffe with a stone in a sock described him and recognised him after his arrest.
Prior to his arrest most of his assaults were NOT in the Ripper frame but they brought them in at that stage. The Ripper left no survivor. Three hammer blows to penetrate the skull while Sutcliffe had 13 blows.
The copycat killer couldnt match the ferocity of the Ripper. You need to study the case before making an ass of yourself. It wasnt a count game.
noelogaraa 2 years ago
you said it benskiboy
horselaverda 2 years ago
This is common knowledge. The Preston victim was murdered by a man who was a B-secreter (less than 6% of the male population). Sutcliffe, although he had nothing to lose, denied he was the killer in that case. The problem was that the Sunderland letters were also written by a B-secreter, which led the police to chase a complete red herring for years.
mookie2637 3 years ago
It was freely admitted amongst police officers during 1980 that there was a copycat killer involved. It started with the murder of Yvonne Pearson in Bradford and they stated then that it was a copycat killer. That copycat killer was Sutcliffe and he eventually comitted three more murders and all the assaults and was eliminated 12 times by blood analysis and his teeth pattern. However he confessed to the lot and that made him the ripper for a defeated police force.
noelogaraa 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sutcliffe is a hero he didnt kill human beings he only killed prostitutes. Release the man and give him a knighthood for getting the pros off the street Sir Peter Sutcliffe
prankmasterjph 3 years ago
You complete idiot.
These people have families and children.
You're almost as sick as him.
tabooteasing 3 years ago 4
@prankmasterjph You're a retard. He was a sick pervert who went for any easy prey and wore a cut off jumper on his legs so he could kneel while he masturbated. It was just that he was so ugly that he could only get prostitutes in his car, but he attacked many more types by hitting them from behind.
SuzLa1 1 year ago
If there has been a cover up, why has neither Sutcliffe or Humble, been convicted of the unsolved Preston murder, for Closure?
johncopey 3 years ago
johncopey,no cover up here.sutcliffe is the yorkshire ripper, no doubt about it.humble read about the preston murder in the papers,thats it,simple.
horselaverda 3 years ago 2
simple for you because you are so gullible. Perhaps thats why the police just wrap up the high profile crimes with stitch ups.
So how did Ron Warren know that there were two killers involved in the Ripper frame then?
noelogaraa 3 years ago
ron warren god rest him,could say whatever he wants,without facts,evidence,it means nothing. you could write and probably sell a book called"lady diana was an alien"people will read it,some might even believe it,but like youre book,its pure fantasy.
horselaverda 3 years ago 2
Mr Warren was an elected county councillor and was deputy chairman of the West Yorkshire Police authority during the hunt for the Ripper. He and the other members were told many times by the top brass police that there were two different killers involved. Sutcliffe was already eliminated as the Ripper then because they wanted to get the main man who was blood group B and had a large gap in his teeth. Nobody wanted a copycat killer, a nutter but thats what they got in the end.
noelogaraa 3 years ago
Very true
David Icke sells books and DVD's saying the royals are some sort of alien lizard race!!!!!
DB2647 3 years ago 4
Because there wasn't a coverup obviously!
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago
Why some people stamp their ignorance in poorly constructed comments is beyond me. We all complain about the police force's competency when dealing with crime but accept it as truth whenever a crime is wrapped up.
Added to this, it's impossible that anyone in this day & age would ever confess to a crime with which they did not commit right???
scenic456 3 years ago
Sutcliffe was not the Ripper. He was a copycat killer who had committed 4 of the murders and all the assaults. He confessed to all the murders because they offered him no trial and ten years in the mental home.
noelogaraa 3 years ago
Okay I'll bite. How many more murders did this other person commit after Sutcliffe was caught?
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago
you're biting nothing my friend because you havent got the brains to bite anything.
the Ripper murders were well documented and the evidence was well exposed to the public. Sutcliffe was eliminated how many times?
before they got a confession out of him. The Real Ripper is not a fool and he knew that the cops would eventually do that to the lunatic who was copying his murders.Thats why he was writing to them. He took credit for Sutcliffe's murders and they knew the letters came from the ripper
noelogaraa 3 years ago
Absolute bollocks. You're nothing but another conspiracy nutcase who wouldn't accept when he's wrong because you've invested too much time in this crap. Would you like a new tinfoil hat for xmas?
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago 2
It's Keith Hellawell's dad....
bluebus270 3 years ago
unfortunately Ron Warren died last year.
noelogaraa 3 years ago
LMAO! About right horselaverda!
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago 6
That man was one of the few brave men who was not afraid to stick his neck out and admit that there were two killers in the Ripper frame.
His comments were broadcast on Yorkshire TV look North on 30 September 2006, the anniversary of the first Ripper murder.
noelogaraa 3 years ago
There were not two killers.
EvilPaperclip 3 years ago 2
are you trying to rewrite history? The police stated there were two killers many times before Sutcliffe's arrest.
Obviously one was the Ripper and the other a copycat killer. That turned out to be Sutcliffe and the police offered him a deal to confess to the lot.
noelogaraa 3 years ago
give that owl fella a few whiskeys,and he would say anything
horselaverda 3 years ago