Added: 3 years ago
From: noelogaraa
Views: 3,949
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So where is this Billy Tracy now, if he exists?

  • @SuzLa1 God only knows. If you went to your local police now and told them the real ripper was seen down the road they would laugh at you. They just dont want to know because they know that people are fitted up all the time so that they close an outstanding case, especially if it is high profile.

    If you and I were the real Birmingham bombers and went into the Bham police to confess, guess what they would say to us? F... off We know who done it.

  • Just to refresh my memory Noel, which victims do you believe were Sutcliffes?

  • if you check out my website yorkshireripper with dotcom after it, you will see the evidence that proves beyond any doubt the killings that Sutcliffe did. He also was responsible for all the assaults most of which were later put in as Ripper assaults but prior to his arrest they were outside the ripper frame. As Ron Warren confirms police knew there was a nutter out there trying to copy the Ripper. That nutter turned out to be Sutcliffe.thats why there are so many unanswered questions about him.

  • yes of course noel

  • weird coincidence o'gara that you think sutcliffe only murdered 4 but comitted all the assaults- pack it in you tool, you've been at this game too long.

  • The evidence is clear. Most of the women assaulted by Sutcliffe with a stone in a sock described him and recognised him after his arrest.

    Prior to his arrest most of his assaults were NOT in the Ripper frame but they brought them in at that stage. The Ripper left no survivor. Three hammer blows to penetrate the skull while Sutcliffe had 13 blows.

    The copycat killer couldnt match the ferocity of the Ripper. You need to study the case before making an ass of yourself. It wasnt a count game.

  • you said it benskiboy

  • This is common knowledge. The Preston victim was murdered by a man who was a B-secreter (less than 6% of the male population). Sutcliffe, although he had nothing to lose, denied he was the killer in that case. The problem was that the Sunderland letters were also written by a B-secreter, which led the police to chase a complete red herring for years.

  • It was freely admitted amongst police officers during 1980 that there was a copycat killer involved. It started with the murder of Yvonne Pearson in Bradford and they stated then that it was a copycat killer. That copycat killer was Sutcliffe and he eventually comitted three more murders and all the assaults and was eliminated 12 times by blood analysis and his teeth pattern. However he confessed to the lot and that made him the ripper for a defeated police force.

  • You complete idiot.

    These people have families and children.

    You're almost as sick as him.

  • @prankmasterjph You're a retard. He was a sick pervert who went for any easy prey and wore a cut off jumper on his legs so he could kneel while he masturbated. It was just that he was so ugly that he could only get prostitutes in his car, but he attacked many more types by hitting them from behind.

  • If there has been a cover up, why has neither Sutcliffe or Humble, been convicted of the unsolved Preston murder, for Closure?

  • johncopey,no cover up here.sutcliffe is the yorkshire ripper, no doubt about it.humble read about the preston murder in the papers,thats it,simple.

  • simple for you because you are so gullible. Perhaps thats why the police just wrap up the high profile crimes with stitch ups.

    So how did Ron Warren know that there were two killers involved in the Ripper frame then?

  • ron warren god rest him,could say whatever he wants,without facts,evidence,it means nothing. you could write and probably sell a book called"lady diana was an alien"people will read it,some might even believe it,but like youre book,its pure fantasy.

  • Mr Warren was an elected county councillor and was deputy chairman of the West Yorkshire Police authority during the hunt for the Ripper. He and the other members were told many times by the top brass police that there were two different killers involved. Sutcliffe was already eliminated as the Ripper then because they wanted to get the main man who was blood group B and had a large gap in his teeth. Nobody wanted a copycat killer, a nutter but thats what they got in the end.

  • Very true

    David Icke sells books and DVD's saying the royals are some sort of alien lizard race!!!!!

  • Because there wasn't a coverup obviously!

  • Why some people stamp their ignorance in poorly constructed comments is beyond me. We all complain about the police force's competency when dealing with crime but accept it as truth whenever a crime is wrapped up.

    Added to this, it's impossible that anyone in this day & age would ever confess to a crime with which they did not commit right???

  • Sutcliffe was not the Ripper. He was a copycat killer who had committed 4 of the murders and all the assaults. He confessed to all the murders because they offered him no trial and ten years in the mental home.

  • Okay I'll bite. How many more murders did this other person commit after Sutcliffe was caught?

  • you're biting nothing my friend because you havent got the brains to bite anything.

    the Ripper murders were well documented and the evidence was well exposed to the public. Sutcliffe was eliminated how many times?

    before they got a confession out of him. The Real Ripper is not a fool and he knew that the cops would eventually do that to the lunatic who was copying his murders.Thats why he was writing to them. He took credit for Sutcliffe's murders and they knew the letters came from the ripper

  • Absolute bollocks. You're nothing but another conspiracy nutcase who wouldn't accept when he's wrong because you've invested too much time in this crap. Would you like a new tinfoil hat for xmas?

  • It's Keith Hellawell's dad....

  • unfortunately Ron Warren died last year.

  • LMAO! About right horselaverda!

  • That man was one of the few brave men who was not afraid to stick his neck out and admit that there were two killers in the Ripper frame.

    His comments were broadcast on Yorkshire TV look North on 30 September 2006, the anniversary of the first Ripper murder.

  • There were not two killers.

  • are you trying to rewrite history? The police stated there were two killers many times before Sutcliffe's arrest.

    Obviously one was the Ripper and the other a copycat killer. That turned out to be Sutcliffe and the police offered him a deal to confess to the lot.

  • give that owl fella a few whiskeys,and he would say anything

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more