You guys arent remembering the fact that every review written was with the e92 6 speed not the DCT which is 7 speed.. The DCT alone took the 0-60 from 4.5- 4.7 to 3.9- 4.3 on stock. The trans is everything. The Merc has more power and tq but so does a lot of trucks
im not buying this result one single bit. the amount of torque and power the C63 has OVER the M3... even if the M3 is modded, the C63 would have the clear advantage. Every single review clearly indicates the C63 has the grunt advantage on the road. The C63 should have walked the M3.
@DLSJ5 Keep kidding yourself. From your description you are saying the modded M3 has +40whp over stock, and the 'modded C63 with powerchip tune, +59whp'. The C63 is faster and more powerful as a stock car, its gained more horsepower, and it then loses to a less powerful car? Again I say, keep kidding yourself.
@IDaedalus lol, you are kidding yourself if you think real world results can always be 100% predicted by dyno results. There is no doubt that the C63 has more mod potential and is normally the faster car. I also lost to a stock C63 with a P31 package. Regardless in side by side comparo's between these two particular modded cars, on that day, this is what the result was.
To the ppl that didn't see the c63 is in sport mode, that means he's not starting in the right gear , or using manual shift mode, and to the people who said the amg's transmission is bad or worse than the m3's Go look again, dct has nothing on mct.
Hahaha, the bmw has 5 tune ups, and has 40 whp more.
The Merc, has 1, and has almost 60......... Difference anybody?
But, i must say, the bmw has alot better powertrain than the Merc, that is the transmission, because you can clearly see that although the Merc has more whp, it cant RUN from the more effective bmw.
The C63 should have pulled hard on the M3. I don't get it... Has the M3 gone through stage 3 weight reduction? stock for stock we know the C63 is much faster than the M3 in the straight line racing like shown in this video. In other video the modded c63 just "trumps" the modded M3.
this is funny a c63 with just an ecu reflash and bam hella modded m3 loses.. ill give u one thing tho ur m3 sounds wicked. i love bmw i have my self a 3er actually i just have a soft spot for the c63 thats all
true. however, it is not impressive since the C63 has an engine that is 2.3L higher in displacement. I love the C63AMG, great car, but I had more fun with the M3 around the track. The car is much more planted and fun to drive (on the track). Now, subjectively speaking, I also think the M3 has a little bit of better cosmetics with the side line aerodynamics, front end and mirrors. The C63 will always be the best at the drag...but I see the C63 vs the M3 like the C63 (M3) vs CTS-V (C63).
The CTS-V can have more torque and can be quicker in the drag strip, but it still a cadillac and it lacks in refinement and styling...so I would much rather have the C63. Well, it's very similar when the C63 is against the M3....
I think my main issue with the C63 is the lack of styling (couldve done a little bit more cosmetic-wise), the tranny (It quick but cant match the DCT...plus it doesn't stand racing threshold...Had problems with the SL63's MCT and the 2010 E63's at the track, which are technically more advance, yet still cant compare to the DCT), muscle car engine its not made for track, its hard to explain but you have to race it to know what I am talking about...sort of chokes after a few laps...
I see AMG engineers just look for the easy way out...they dont put as much effort and engineering in their cars...its all about corporate sales convenience...do you think BMW benefits from 6mt tranny (sales wise)? they mostly do it for their enthusiasts. MB doesnt even wanna put them on the cars b/c it makes no difference to them in sales...that's a big "screw you" to their [enthusiast] customers base...just shows they are just there for the money.
Very nice vids. I own a C63 and planning on doing a tune. BTW, I visited the AMG factory in Affalterbach and was face to face with builders and engineers. The C63's M156 is capable of 700HP, N/A.... what can the M3 do N/A? LOL. j/k. ;-P
well with the 3.2 liter e46 it made 343 hp [euro version] N/A. mercedez ever make a 3 liter engine in the history of m-benz do anything like that? Benz's do make the most incredible straight line speed. But once there's an "L" turn, it's advised you follow the speed limit.
just to answer your question no fued or anything no hard feelings not trying to insult but in the early 80s the M3 was even able to acheive more then the c63 @700hp and 6.3 liters that equals 111 hp per liter and and the first m3 was easily capable of 320hp from a 2.3 liter thats being moddest that equals 139hp per liter and this is in the 80s remember not trying to talk shit or anything just answering your question :) doesnt matter to me AMG and M are both beautiful together they could dominate
@HeelnToad Im a Mercedes anthusiast, but i have realized that although the "effective" and, more important for us, COMFORTABLE, transmissions of Mercedes and AMG, they are NOT good against rivals in terms of performance. So, if i were you, i would do some research in maybe converting "my" C63 into a manual, OR send it in to AMG so they can modify the transmission so it gets more horsepower down to the road. Because this sight is normal, m3's can actually beat a C63 because if this. :( Sad....
interesting video, seems both cars are almost equal. I am really surprised you didnt pull a little more after I raced a tune, intake and no cat C63........
You shouldn't be "really" surprised, lol, I had my full interior, and the C63 I ran made 401WHP on a DD's, and didn't have the extra weight of a passenger filming! :P
Not sure when we are rerunning, he blew some steering wheel pump or something like that this past week, or it failed not really sure......but within the next few weeks we are probably going to run something but I am gonna be in vegas this next week so not really sure when.
Honestly I think I will do better since getting the stett charge pipe and fixing the boost leak/limp modes i had during the runs.
You guys arent remembering the fact that every review written was with the e92 6 speed not the DCT which is 7 speed.. The DCT alone took the 0-60 from 4.5- 4.7 to 3.9- 4.3 on stock. The trans is everything. The Merc has more power and tq but so does a lot of trucks
falcon4272 2 months ago
u guys in america need G-POWER TUNING!
apriliafan 7 months ago
@apriliafan The car now has an ESS Supercharger on it. :)
DLSJ5 7 months ago
m3 shocked me
LBB988 7 months ago
wow what an even race. exactly what racing should be :)
guitaristwagner 8 months ago
im not buying this result one single bit. the amount of torque and power the C63 has OVER the M3... even if the M3 is modded, the C63 would have the clear advantage. Every single review clearly indicates the C63 has the grunt advantage on the road. The C63 should have walked the M3.
robbyjai 8 months ago
These are the videos I really enjoy. This is your classic case of 'neck and neck' and is about as close as you can get.
SirtubalotTX 10 months ago
Tuned M3 vs Stock C63
IDaedalus 10 months ago
@IDaedalus No it's a tuned C63. :)
DLSJ5 10 months ago
@DLSJ5 Keep kidding yourself. From your description you are saying the modded M3 has +40whp over stock, and the 'modded C63 with powerchip tune, +59whp'. The C63 is faster and more powerful as a stock car, its gained more horsepower, and it then loses to a less powerful car? Again I say, keep kidding yourself.
IDaedalus 9 months ago
@IDaedalus lol, you are kidding yourself if you think real world results can always be 100% predicted by dyno results. There is no doubt that the C63 has more mod potential and is normally the faster car. I also lost to a stock C63 with a P31 package. Regardless in side by side comparo's between these two particular modded cars, on that day, this is what the result was.
DLSJ5 9 months ago
these cars are so boring
spokismONE 10 months ago
I give it to the M3
Stig140 1 year ago
To the ppl that didn't see the c63 is in sport mode, that means he's not starting in the right gear , or using manual shift mode, and to the people who said the amg's transmission is bad or worse than the m3's Go look again, dct has nothing on mct.
AMGkompressor20 1 year ago
nice i love m3 fucking fast cars there is no need to comare this two cars cause BMW is fastest one on track stock vs stock
enesoft 1 year ago
Race 2 - torque (real life street racing) wins races!!
keithjackson302 1 year ago
Hahaha, the bmw has 5 tune ups, and has 40 whp more.
The Merc, has 1, and has almost 60......... Difference anybody?
But, i must say, the bmw has alot better powertrain than the Merc, that is the transmission, because you can clearly see that although the Merc has more whp, it cant RUN from the more effective bmw.
2URBO2 1 year ago
That Gtronic Tranny in the AMG sucks. if it Had the MCT one it woyld kill the M3 any day
luimarco 1 year ago
@luimarco well thats not the case here,the M3 smoked the benz! lol!
kay19833 1 year ago
WOW i did not know that the e92 can hang with the c63 like that its faster. You did an excellent job tuning your engine good job
bimmerM3003 1 year ago
Axle hop!
oneofakindtrini 1 year ago
The C63 should have pulled hard on the M3. I don't get it... Has the M3 gone through stage 3 weight reduction? stock for stock we know the C63 is much faster than the M3 in the straight line racing like shown in this video. In other video the modded c63 just "trumps" the modded M3.
IS350King 1 year ago
I would hope with over 500hp he would pull the M3. The C63 is good in a straight line but thats it. We all know where the M3 shines.
InsaneBimmer 1 year ago
Damn.... what a race. Close and fun to watch.
Rastamut 2 years ago 2
m power
Lavdr1m 2 years ago
EARGASM!!!! -- Both sweet cars.....I'd like to see what the C63 would do with long tube headers and a retune......
mdunn604 2 years ago 6
With those additional mods, he would pull!
DLSJ5 2 years ago 3
this is funny a c63 with just an ecu reflash and bam hella modded m3 loses.. ill give u one thing tho ur m3 sounds wicked. i love bmw i have my self a 3er actually i just have a soft spot for the c63 thats all
AMGkompressor20 2 years ago
true. however, it is not impressive since the C63 has an engine that is 2.3L higher in displacement. I love the C63AMG, great car, but I had more fun with the M3 around the track. The car is much more planted and fun to drive (on the track). Now, subjectively speaking, I also think the M3 has a little bit of better cosmetics with the side line aerodynamics, front end and mirrors. The C63 will always be the best at the drag...but I see the C63 vs the M3 like the C63 (M3) vs CTS-V (C63).
karmahunden 2 years ago
The CTS-V can have more torque and can be quicker in the drag strip, but it still a cadillac and it lacks in refinement and styling...so I would much rather have the C63. Well, it's very similar when the C63 is against the M3....
karmahunden 2 years ago
I think my main issue with the C63 is the lack of styling (couldve done a little bit more cosmetic-wise), the tranny (It quick but cant match the DCT...plus it doesn't stand racing threshold...Had problems with the SL63's MCT and the 2010 E63's at the track, which are technically more advance, yet still cant compare to the DCT), muscle car engine its not made for track, its hard to explain but you have to race it to know what I am talking about...sort of chokes after a few laps...
karmahunden 2 years ago
I see AMG engineers just look for the easy way out...they dont put as much effort and engineering in their cars...its all about corporate sales convenience...do you think BMW benefits from 6mt tranny (sales wise)? they mostly do it for their enthusiasts. MB doesnt even wanna put them on the cars b/c it makes no difference to them in sales...that's a big "screw you" to their [enthusiast] customers base...just shows they are just there for the money.
karmahunden 2 years ago 2
Very nice vids. I own a C63 and planning on doing a tune. BTW, I visited the AMG factory in Affalterbach and was face to face with builders and engineers. The C63's M156 is capable of 700HP, N/A.... what can the M3 do N/A? LOL. j/k. ;-P
HeelnToad 2 years ago
Thanks man, no doubt that motor has HUGE potential!! With one more mod on this C63, he would have pulled in every run.
DLSJ5 2 years ago
well with the 3.2 liter e46 it made 343 hp [euro version] N/A. mercedez ever make a 3 liter engine in the history of m-benz do anything like that? Benz's do make the most incredible straight line speed. But once there's an "L" turn, it's advised you follow the speed limit.
jyhighsky 2 years ago
ell said
v8beater 2 years ago
just to answer your question no fued or anything no hard feelings not trying to insult but in the early 80s the M3 was even able to acheive more then the c63 @700hp and 6.3 liters that equals 111 hp per liter and and the first m3 was easily capable of 320hp from a 2.3 liter thats being moddest that equals 139hp per liter and this is in the 80s remember not trying to talk shit or anything just answering your question :) doesnt matter to me AMG and M are both beautiful together they could dominate
burritomaker69 2 years ago 4
all 4cylinder engines were capable of 300hp 2.0 2.3 and 2.5 only nm were different
dartasweideris 2 years ago
@HeelnToad Im a Mercedes anthusiast, but i have realized that although the "effective" and, more important for us, COMFORTABLE, transmissions of Mercedes and AMG, they are NOT good against rivals in terms of performance. So, if i were you, i would do some research in maybe converting "my" C63 into a manual, OR send it in to AMG so they can modify the transmission so it gets more horsepower down to the road. Because this sight is normal, m3's can actually beat a C63 because if this. :( Sad....
2URBO2 1 year ago
@HeelnToad I highly doubt that you own a mercedes you sound so dumb and and retarted so stupid and immature i bet you can't even get girls
Stig140 1 year ago
@HeelnToad that is true is urs an amg?
iluvchoas 11 months ago
why c63 stopped?
PEROlozhach 2 years ago
No more road left, ;)
DLSJ5 2 years ago
1:41 look at driver.. 'oh no....oh...' no offence. both are great cars. :-)
hunkintown 2 years ago
Really nice video man,but you couldn't pull it with a huge difference.
i myself somked a C63 in my E46 M3,it was doing 50 and i passed it with 60 :D
SinaPouya90 2 years ago
What mods do you have on your E46?
kushnugz 2 years ago
Not much,Carbon fiber intake,bigger valves and a whole new eisenmann exhaust ;D
SinaPouya90 2 years ago
interesting video, seems both cars are almost equal. I am really surprised you didnt pull a little more after I raced a tune, intake and no cat C63........
golfer1659 2 years ago
You shouldn't be "really" surprised, lol, I had my full interior, and the C63 I ran made 401WHP on a DD's, and didn't have the extra weight of a passenger filming! :P
When you re-running that C63?
DLSJ5 2 years ago
Not sure when we are rerunning, he blew some steering wheel pump or something like that this past week, or it failed not really sure......but within the next few weeks we are probably going to run something but I am gonna be in vegas this next week so not really sure when.
Honestly I think I will do better since getting the stett charge pipe and fixing the boost leak/limp modes i had during the runs.
golfer1659 2 years ago
you had a passenger?
03basesedan 2 years ago
last run was the best
e46competitionM3 2 years ago
those were some great runs, all of them were so close
rdones1 2 years ago
That tune sure helped him alot.
JonMartin84 2 years ago
Bigtime!
DLSJ5 2 years ago
damnn that tune helped alot
itsjayweezy 2 years ago
AWESOME! can't wait to put some dinan mods on my M3. you should look into the throttle boddies and an intake.
socratesRAM 2 years ago
amazing...and you manage the camara as well...wow..bmw all the way!!!!
twinsonboard 2 years ago 2
BMW ALL THE WAY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
apriliafan 2 years ago
Great showing, Drew! I wanna play, too.
RonDeKiller 2 years ago