already mad the only last solution is to go to war because in fact the united states is not going to pay the debt to their enemies. if in fact that happends china is gonna suffer big time with no combat expierience wat so ever not only that but its biblical prohacy he who goes against israel god will in fact destroy those countries. so we have the united states ,england ,israel vs iran ,china the big red, and russians guess wat go read the book of ezekiel its there ww3
china lets our fleet to visit the big red why number one here goes, china does not have the brains to design military weapons on there own so guess wat they make knock offf lolzolzol. two go into history for ww2 .why do u think ww2 was fought to help chinnnaaaaaaa lolzolzozl.so china do ur self a fucken favor go fuck ur self because in the long run the big u.s can de value the chinesse curency and thats why china is mad. now china has there currency de valued already done. what now there
@kryptonian55 I've seen so many of your Americans keep saying "nuke China nuke China" all the time, fortunately again we build many more nuclear weapons so you have no chance to nuke us. China isn't the country looking for fight, look back history only Western powers crossing the oceans to attack China, by building more of these aircraft carriers you can continue to rule the world and to continue to contain China but we Chinese won't accept that we'll build more missiles for your carriers.
@kryptonian55 Who bully you LOL? Only you send your aircraft carriers crossing the oceans to bother China, you support Taiwan's indepedence and you support Chinese rival Japan to contain China. I just don't understand why Chinese gov't allow your carriers keep visiting Hong Kong. Do we send our fleet to threaten your country all the time like what you're doing to us each day? Fortunately we develop our new missiles to counter your carriers or we have no security at home at all.
@fastkillmmm I assume you are Chinese and I was in the US Navy not long ago. From what I know the US isn't trying to threaten or bother China. The US Navy has had a policy of forward deployment ( keeping the Navy spread around the world ) ever since Japan bombed us in WWII. The US defends them to prevent another Japan Empire. I know China suffered. Taiwan is something I still need to know more about but I understand they have a claim that they are the real China. England could claim America.
@Techead78 Fact is with all the conflict in the world... who wants to start anything? Sure its nice to have a nice military to feel secure but it is very expensive to use. It has reshaped and some way weakened the US economy a good deal. I have found it easier for populations to threaten each other with military strikes so long as it isn't them doing the real fighting. There are people in the world that want us both dead just for living, being able to read, or other reasons.
@fastkillmmm Can Red Chinas little navy survive a massive retaliation from the U.S. if Red China were to dare start a naval war with the United States? I dont think so? You're acting like ther DF-21 will destroy american response lol.
@kryptonian55 LMAO if you think your aircraft carriers are cities then don't bring them out to fight. What massive retaliation? Without carriers, you have no legs and arms, but you have to do is retreat. Oh maybe nukes? Haha hey your American military experts just estimate China has 3,000 nuclear warheads, check this article on Google to find out -----> The "Underground Great Wall:" An Alternative Explanation. If you nuke us we'll nuke you back, simple of that.
@fastkillmmm Who the hell said anything about America nuking china first??!?!! The same goes for you. if China nukes U.S. first, China would get nuked right back. As you said "simple of that" America has more nukes then red china. Not that it matters anyway, as nuke armed countries have more then enough to end world civilization. And as for "retreating" ahaha keep deluding yourself with that. So tough, guy why hasnt red china attacked us yet? ::poof::: Chinese civilization would ome to an end!
@kryptonian55 I've seen so many of your Americans keep saying "nuke China nuke China" all the time, fortunately again we build many more nuclear weapons so you have no chance to nuke us. China isn't the country looking for fight, look back history only your Western powers crossing the oceans to attack China, by building more of these aircraft carriers you can continue to rule the world and to continue to contain China but we Chinese won't accept that we'll build more missiles for your carriers.
@fastkillmmm I reached the youtube word limit so I couldnt post more. Wanted to say that you also have "no arms and no legs"as you put it. Truth be told, I have nothing against Chinese people in general. I just cant stand bullies like you that seem to find your way to any youtube videos involving US air carriers. The Chinese govt obviously didnt have a problem with the fleet visiting Hong Kong, which is what this video is about. You can brag about nukes all you want, we have them too. So what?
@kryptonian55 Who bully you LOL? Only you send your aircraft carriers crossing the oceans to bother China, you support Taiwan's indepedence and you support Chinese rival Japan to contain China. I just don't understand why Chinese gov't allow your carriers keep visiting Hong Kong. Do we send our fleet to threaten your country all the time like what you're doing to us each day? Fortunately we develop our new missiles to counter your carriers or we have no security at home at all.
WAKE UP ! Carriers now is 4 small war power projection, 4 a big war its a sitting duck, Chinese TF-21D is unstoppable, cz the manuval capability, 2rd, its coming by a wave attack, Beside Chinese stealth 7 round missil attack group boat, & EMP missil, (that shot down all electronic of z cruise ship in CA coast) other Aegis SM-3 destroyer won't help much(cz 10 meter, cz only a 45 second once detect to target
Future war is space, cyber, economic war, both Chinese and american r ready for it.
@fastkillmmm The F22 can be in an airbase in the U.S then fly aaaaall the way over towards china (via aerial refueling) We also have unmanned drones and 11 super carriers. The aircraft carrier is where the firepower is at.
@tehatemachine No, not the fighter pilots, too exhausted for F22 pilots fly their planes crossing the Pacific then face hundreds of Chinese fighters and powerful Chinese air defend system. Yes for B2 bomber pilots, more rooms and pilots so they can cross the ocean and drop bombs, but US only has 20 of them, without the protection from F-22 they can be in serious danger. UAVs are attackers not fighters they're very weak. US has 11 carriers but China has thousands of missiles. What is your point?
n then humanity ends as we know it just cause of few crazy cunts who run the show n its FA the ppl can do about it ppl do Not want war they fight it n die in wars the ppl who start wars Never have to fight n die they send others to fight n die for them so they are always Brave same shit through history n we still haven't learn
there will be no war. i though there would be in 2010 after all that happened. but it would appear nothing will happen. besides sanctions are doing more damage then a war would. if war does break out i would love to see america hang that fat fuck kim jong il plus if n. korea falls communism takes another hit.
Idk why people keep thinking Russia and the US are going to fight, its not gunna happen, plus Russia hates Korea even more and TOLD the US, if the US engages in war with North Korea that the Russians would be by their side.
With what? Have you seen the Russian navy lately? They are crumbling with rust as they have been tied to the same pier for 10 years straight. I watched a report on this last week. over 60% of their submarine fleet and 48% of their surface fleet are not sea worthy right now, and that number is only going to get worse. The only way a Russian ship will sink a US ship is if we accidentally run into it while it's sitting on the ocean floor.
@smacman68 HAHAHA Good one! We should send a million spray cans of Rustolium to Russia just to help them out a little bit. Isn´t boring now that we´re the only SUPERPOWER left in the world?
Yeah, kinda sad. Back in '86 when I was an Aviation Ordinance Tech, I was a magazine rat on the USS Roosevelt CVN-71. We would have Russian Bears do fly-overs and we always had a Tomcat right on his ass the whole time. That was when the Soviet Union was the Rompin' Stompin' Russian Red Ass. A true adversary. I think that's about when it began to unravel for them. I still respect the Russians as brave and strong warriors, just with no cash to operate a blue water navy.
@smacman68 And the only way a US ship will ever sink a russian ship is if you are stupid and pig headed enough to bring about the end of human civilisation as we know it. You and all your redneck hillbilly inbred motherfucking family will be obliterated in a split second when the russian bombs start falling. Why do you fucking 12 year olds post such fucking bullshit comments here. What do you know about the Russian Navy apart from your "report" that you watch on TV? People like you cause wars.
First of all, 12 years old? If you read my reply a couple spots above this one, I was in the Navy back in '86. I am a modern military history academic from Ball State University, with a minor in International Relations. I not only studied them while I was in the service, but did my thesis on the collapse of communism. What do I know? Well, when it comes to you scathing reply, I am not sure. Why the hostility? I don't condem war. I respect and admire the Russian people. I know my facts, that all.
@ClTIZEN your the real danger to this world, the uneducated folks only worrying about a countries military, and spreading shit.... you remind me of two girls one cup, eating it and throwing it up like a pussy...
@Blahblahblah14898 -- >Pot calling Kettle >Schwarze, eh? Loyal TrueBlue Americano flagwaving hater, spit and insult is as close as you get to Military Shoeshine dignity & respect, you blame everybody & everything for what is 'wrong' with the nation you've betrayed w/ your own pretend-allegiance & delusional 'honor'. You're the kind of Patriotic Follower that embraces the cleverness of doublethink hypocrisy because its easier & simpler than sticking to principles. Klepto-Corporatism suits you.
@ClTIZEN oh yeah there are many factors to war, and such and such j=how can a dumbass start one, he going to arm himself and stop all food supplies to a country in need? no, is he going to be elected as a leader to a country? no is he going to make his own country and make a lot of money and build up a military NO! and the russian navy has had so many major budget cuts, alot of there sailors arent getting new supplies and uniforms. instead the goverment is spending money on skyscrapers and r.tod
@smacman68 it be a tu 160 or t22 to sink a carrier. Not their navy most likely till their carrier gets loaded with pak-fa. They do have newer subs though. Overall china is trying to be the only challenge in the sea.
@smacman68 that was true while the us backed russian mafia was pillaging the russian economy while puppet yeltsin the "demograd" was in power things are very different now in an all out war aircraft carriers will be top priority targets from nuke currying ICBMs only ICBMs Subs air defences n air power will matter carriers are good against Gaddafi n saddamor u think Russia will send their vastly outnumbered navy to take on the us navy? ICBMs will blow both navies n each other's sattelites first
@smacman68 There is actually no chance that US navy will ever fight with the Russian navy, without the nuclear weapons being used first and making any further battle completely unnecessary. The smaller-scale weapons are now purely a way to suppress small countries, and it has nothing to do with the national security. But the next time you complain about the economy crisis, think that this animal sense of pride and superiority is exactly its cause (military expenses are 25% of the budget!).
@smacman68 they dont need to compete with all that, just keep their nukes and strategic assets current, a few fast attack squadrons and they dont even need to get back home. think sum of all fears, swarm a aircraft carrier, launch muitiple nuke armed missiles, let at least one hit, maybe sacrifice themselves in the process. simultaneously take out command centres like pentagon, and then follow up with the big icbm torrent. the world will be swept clean to build the new one in a few hours.
already mad the only last solution is to go to war because in fact the united states is not going to pay the debt to their enemies. if in fact that happends china is gonna suffer big time with no combat expierience wat so ever not only that but its biblical prohacy he who goes against israel god will in fact destroy those countries. so we have the united states ,england ,israel vs iran ,china the big red, and russians guess wat go read the book of ezekiel its there ww3
LILCISCO1604 3 months ago
@LILCISCO1604 Yes China has everything to prove, none of their weapons have been throughoutly combat tested.
82ndairborne100 3 weeks ago
china lets our fleet to visit the big red why number one here goes, china does not have the brains to design military weapons on there own so guess wat they make knock offf lolzolzol. two go into history for ww2 .why do u think ww2 was fought to help chinnnaaaaaaa lolzolzozl.so china do ur self a fucken favor go fuck ur self because in the long run the big u.s can de value the chinesse curency and thats why china is mad. now china has there currency de valued already done. what now there
LILCISCO1604 3 months ago
@LILCISCO1604 All China can do is steal.
82ndairborne100 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kryptonian55 I've seen so many of your Americans keep saying "nuke China nuke China" all the time, fortunately again we build many more nuclear weapons so you have no chance to nuke us. China isn't the country looking for fight, look back history only Western powers crossing the oceans to attack China, by building more of these aircraft carriers you can continue to rule the world and to continue to contain China but we Chinese won't accept that we'll build more missiles for your carriers.
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@kryptonian55 Who bully you LOL? Only you send your aircraft carriers crossing the oceans to bother China, you support Taiwan's indepedence and you support Chinese rival Japan to contain China. I just don't understand why Chinese gov't allow your carriers keep visiting Hong Kong. Do we send our fleet to threaten your country all the time like what you're doing to us each day? Fortunately we develop our new missiles to counter your carriers or we have no security at home at all.
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@fastkillmmm I assume you are Chinese and I was in the US Navy not long ago. From what I know the US isn't trying to threaten or bother China. The US Navy has had a policy of forward deployment ( keeping the Navy spread around the world ) ever since Japan bombed us in WWII. The US defends them to prevent another Japan Empire. I know China suffered. Taiwan is something I still need to know more about but I understand they have a claim that they are the real China. England could claim America.
Techead78 3 days ago
@Techead78 Fact is with all the conflict in the world... who wants to start anything? Sure its nice to have a nice military to feel secure but it is very expensive to use. It has reshaped and some way weakened the US economy a good deal. I have found it easier for populations to threaten each other with military strikes so long as it isn't them doing the real fighting. There are people in the world that want us both dead just for living, being able to read, or other reasons.
Techead78 3 days ago
Can it survive from one strike of Chinese DF-21D missile?
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@fastkillmmm Can Red Chinas little navy survive a massive retaliation from the U.S. if Red China were to dare start a naval war with the United States? I dont think so? You're acting like ther DF-21 will destroy american response lol.
kryptonian55 3 months ago
@kryptonian55 LMAO if you think your aircraft carriers are cities then don't bring them out to fight. What massive retaliation? Without carriers, you have no legs and arms, but you have to do is retreat. Oh maybe nukes? Haha hey your American military experts just estimate China has 3,000 nuclear warheads, check this article on Google to find out -----> The "Underground Great Wall:" An Alternative Explanation. If you nuke us we'll nuke you back, simple of that.
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@fastkillmmm Who the hell said anything about America nuking china first??!?!! The same goes for you. if China nukes U.S. first, China would get nuked right back. As you said "simple of that" America has more nukes then red china. Not that it matters anyway, as nuke armed countries have more then enough to end world civilization. And as for "retreating" ahaha keep deluding yourself with that. So tough, guy why hasnt red china attacked us yet? ::poof::: Chinese civilization would ome to an end!
kryptonian55 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kryptonian55 I've seen so many of your Americans keep saying "nuke China nuke China" all the time, fortunately again we build many more nuclear weapons so you have no chance to nuke us. China isn't the country looking for fight, look back history only your Western powers crossing the oceans to attack China, by building more of these aircraft carriers you can continue to rule the world and to continue to contain China but we Chinese won't accept that we'll build more missiles for your carriers.
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@fastkillmmm I reached the youtube word limit so I couldnt post more. Wanted to say that you also have "no arms and no legs"as you put it. Truth be told, I have nothing against Chinese people in general. I just cant stand bullies like you that seem to find your way to any youtube videos involving US air carriers. The Chinese govt obviously didnt have a problem with the fleet visiting Hong Kong, which is what this video is about. You can brag about nukes all you want, we have them too. So what?
kryptonian55 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kryptonian55 Who bully you LOL? Only you send your aircraft carriers crossing the oceans to bother China, you support Taiwan's indepedence and you support Chinese rival Japan to contain China. I just don't understand why Chinese gov't allow your carriers keep visiting Hong Kong. Do we send our fleet to threaten your country all the time like what you're doing to us each day? Fortunately we develop our new missiles to counter your carriers or we have no security at home at all.
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
got that top gun feelin from the start!
mikefan09 3 months ago
WAKE UP ! Carriers now is 4 small war power projection, 4 a big war its a sitting duck, Chinese TF-21D is unstoppable, cz the manuval capability, 2rd, its coming by a wave attack, Beside Chinese stealth 7 round missil attack group boat, & EMP missil, (that shot down all electronic of z cruise ship in CA coast) other Aegis SM-3 destroyer won't help much(cz 10 meter, cz only a 45 second once detect to target
Future war is space, cyber, economic war, both Chinese and american r ready for it.
energyalt56 5 months ago 9
@energyalt56 SEND OUT THE F22's!
tehatemachine 4 months ago
@tehatemachine Chinese DF-21 missiles can destroy airbases on land too. No airbases, no take off and landing for F-22s.
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@fastkillmmm The F22 can be in an airbase in the U.S then fly aaaaall the way over towards china (via aerial refueling) We also have unmanned drones and 11 super carriers. The aircraft carrier is where the firepower is at.
tehatemachine 3 months ago
@tehatemachine No, not the fighter pilots, too exhausted for F22 pilots fly their planes crossing the Pacific then face hundreds of Chinese fighters and powerful Chinese air defend system. Yes for B2 bomber pilots, more rooms and pilots so they can cross the ocean and drop bombs, but US only has 20 of them, without the protection from F-22 they can be in serious danger. UAVs are attackers not fighters they're very weak. US has 11 carriers but China has thousands of missiles. What is your point?
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@tehatemachine Do you know DF-21D is CARRIER KILLER? Your US military experts call it the GAME CHANGER.
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
@fastkillmmm I dare China to try and sink a carrier. That basically equals attacking a U.S. city. See what happens in response.
kryptonian55 3 months ago
@energyalt56 Very good comment!!!
fastkillmmm 3 months ago
n then humanity ends as we know it just cause of few crazy cunts who run the show n its FA the ppl can do about it ppl do Not want war they fight it n die in wars the ppl who start wars Never have to fight n die they send others to fight n die for them so they are always Brave same shit through history n we still haven't learn
polygamous1 5 months ago
So what's it doing in Hong Kong?
RedFileProductions 5 months ago
Magnificent ship!!!
1LonePuma 6 months ago
russian federation is over.
its similar to many states now
student135 9 months ago
@student135 like divided states of america
NosferatuAaacaado 7 months ago
Serbians will give everything to destroy one of this,i sow on YTUBE CHANNEL THEY TALKING ABOUT!!bastards !!
dylanfloyd777 10 months ago
i wish i had one of those
JLai1969 10 months ago
lol at guy 1:56
chrisbest1000 11 months ago
there will be no war. i though there would be in 2010 after all that happened. but it would appear nothing will happen. besides sanctions are doing more damage then a war would. if war does break out i would love to see america hang that fat fuck kim jong il plus if n. korea falls communism takes another hit.
TheWatts29 1 year ago
Idk why people keep thinking Russia and the US are going to fight, its not gunna happen, plus Russia hates Korea even more and TOLD the US, if the US engages in war with North Korea that the Russians would be by their side.
314isabeast 1 year ago
Russia will sink it one day ;)
spilot101 1 year ago
With what? Have you seen the Russian navy lately? They are crumbling with rust as they have been tied to the same pier for 10 years straight. I watched a report on this last week. over 60% of their submarine fleet and 48% of their surface fleet are not sea worthy right now, and that number is only going to get worse. The only way a Russian ship will sink a US ship is if we accidentally run into it while it's sitting on the ocean floor.
smacman68 1 year ago 36
@smacman68 HAHAHA Good one! We should send a million spray cans of Rustolium to Russia just to help them out a little bit. Isn´t boring now that we´re the only SUPERPOWER left in the world?
SuperNorthAmerica 1 year ago
Yeah, kinda sad. Back in '86 when I was an Aviation Ordinance Tech, I was a magazine rat on the USS Roosevelt CVN-71. We would have Russian Bears do fly-overs and we always had a Tomcat right on his ass the whole time. That was when the Soviet Union was the Rompin' Stompin' Russian Red Ass. A true adversary. I think that's about when it began to unravel for them. I still respect the Russians as brave and strong warriors, just with no cash to operate a blue water navy.
smacman68 1 year ago
@SuperNorthAmerica saddly we're not in an actual war right now :<
hellagunner1 1 year ago
@smacman68
Happend before... ( the accidentally run into them.... )
Machil77 1 year ago
@smacman68 And the only way a US ship will ever sink a russian ship is if you are stupid and pig headed enough to bring about the end of human civilisation as we know it. You and all your redneck hillbilly inbred motherfucking family will be obliterated in a split second when the russian bombs start falling. Why do you fucking 12 year olds post such fucking bullshit comments here. What do you know about the Russian Navy apart from your "report" that you watch on TV? People like you cause wars.
ClTIZEN 1 year ago
First of all, 12 years old? If you read my reply a couple spots above this one, I was in the Navy back in '86. I am a modern military history academic from Ball State University, with a minor in International Relations. I not only studied them while I was in the service, but did my thesis on the collapse of communism. What do I know? Well, when it comes to you scathing reply, I am not sure. Why the hostility? I don't condem war. I respect and admire the Russian people. I know my facts, that all.
HEADBANGBALLER 1 year ago
@ClTIZEN your the real danger to this world, the uneducated folks only worrying about a countries military, and spreading shit.... you remind me of two girls one cup, eating it and throwing it up like a pussy...
Blahblahblah14898 7 months ago
@Blahblahblah14898 -- >Pot calling Kettle >Schwarze, eh? Loyal TrueBlue Americano flagwaving hater, spit and insult is as close as you get to Military Shoeshine dignity & respect, you blame everybody & everything for what is 'wrong' with the nation you've betrayed w/ your own pretend-allegiance & delusional 'honor'. You're the kind of Patriotic Follower that embraces the cleverness of doublethink hypocrisy because its easier & simpler than sticking to principles. Klepto-Corporatism suits you.
starmanskye 6 months ago
@ClTIZEN oh yeah there are many factors to war, and such and such j=how can a dumbass start one, he going to arm himself and stop all food supplies to a country in need? no, is he going to be elected as a leader to a country? no is he going to make his own country and make a lot of money and build up a military NO! and the russian navy has had so many major budget cuts, alot of there sailors arent getting new supplies and uniforms. instead the goverment is spending money on skyscrapers and r.tod
Blahblahblah14898 7 months ago
@smacman68 it be a tu 160 or t22 to sink a carrier. Not their navy most likely till their carrier gets loaded with pak-fa. They do have newer subs though. Overall china is trying to be the only challenge in the sea.
starknight97 1 year ago
@smacman68 that was true while the us backed russian mafia was pillaging the russian economy while puppet yeltsin the "demograd" was in power things are very different now in an all out war aircraft carriers will be top priority targets from nuke currying ICBMs only ICBMs Subs air defences n air power will matter carriers are good against Gaddafi n saddamor u think Russia will send their vastly outnumbered navy to take on the us navy? ICBMs will blow both navies n each other's sattelites first
polygamous1 5 months ago
@polygamous1 I have no idea what you are getting at, or the purpose of your comment as it relates to my comment.
smacman68 5 months ago
@smacman68 There is actually no chance that US navy will ever fight with the Russian navy, without the nuclear weapons being used first and making any further battle completely unnecessary. The smaller-scale weapons are now purely a way to suppress small countries, and it has nothing to do with the national security. But the next time you complain about the economy crisis, think that this animal sense of pride and superiority is exactly its cause (military expenses are 25% of the budget!).
antlast 3 months ago
@antlast sigh....ok, whatever you say.
smacman68 3 months ago
@smacman68 they dont need to compete with all that, just keep their nukes and strategic assets current, a few fast attack squadrons and they dont even need to get back home. think sum of all fears, swarm a aircraft carrier, launch muitiple nuke armed missiles, let at least one hit, maybe sacrifice themselves in the process. simultaneously take out command centres like pentagon, and then follow up with the big icbm torrent. the world will be swept clean to build the new one in a few hours.
mikefan09 3 months ago
@spilot101 and ill sink you :)
BRANDON85L 1 year ago
It's bigger than the ocean! What's north korea going to do now! hahaha
phads77 1 year ago
And carry a big stick...
skeds61 1 year ago 2
this beast is on its way to korea as i type this comment
primem13 1 year ago
Lived on that thing for almost 4 years.. lotta memories there. S-13 Hazmat days circa 2002-2006
OnPoint773 1 year ago
@OnPoint773 how many people live in there? Thousands?
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican 5000
iColorado303 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican on 99% of the time at least 600 people are onbord.
Thetrutv 1 year ago
90,000 tons of diplomacy. Love it!!!
jmp5255 1 year ago
@jmp5255 lol
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
Miss the Good days on the GW...
CoolAid22 2 years ago
welcome to Hong Kong =]
731densha 2 years ago
cool
cyklonb1989 2 years ago
Welcome to Hong Kong! God Bless America!
wayne1314 2 years ago
yoyo hong kong
y4944060 2 years ago 2
Yo MTV Raps!
Jamesinhongkong 2 years ago