"Pleasures of the Damned" Trailer

[MrLyhue]

time to step up and make a real throwback film. This is unwatchable by the looks of it.

[kateydavenport]

Looks nothing like a film from 1979. FRAUD!

[13animus13]

Fans may not realize this clip actually features outtakes not in the official release...one throat slicing, and an original death of Hermes where he melts into a pudding type substance rather than the final incineration death.

[Razorbacco]

ROBERTO GIALLO FUCK OFF IN YOUR HASS!!! If Tarantino see this fake trailer trown his stomac and make a new film with the italian producer Pino Grisanti and his insane fan Firmin Sorrentino!!! HOLY SOCKS!!!

[dapoetmaster]

Rob Zombie's home movies..

[liveup5]

Looks better than Glitter!

[maninwhitedress]

I love the beginning the trailer, You know it's not true OR IS IT.

[12dave9]

This film looks awful!..like a bad home movie!.

[fotochick49]

this movie is hilaaarious! can't wait to enjoy this fine overdubbed masterpiece while getting tanked at Monkey Town tomorrow night! ha!

[u5bullet]

Holy Jesus. That has to be the most retarde piece of pie... >=(

[seanstonemember]

It's all real--I played Jack Steele, and I'm real too! :) And there were some real reviews too, just that DireWit (those releasing the film), are busy working on the release of Giallo's second film and don't have time (or money :))to push for marketing the first Giallo classic!

[Sati1979]

Just one last post to let you know I am done with you. You haven't made the effort (or maybe you're just a dumbass?) to understand my posts, no matter how many fucking times I try to explain it to you. I simply cannot be bothered to waste any more time arguing with a fool like yourself.

Good bye.

[DireWitFilms]

All reviews for the film, good or bad, are indeed real.

[Sati1979]

And seriously, those so-called 'reviews' are about as authentic as Michael Jackson's nose. Give it up already...it's all bullshit...

Bloody Fuckwit.

[Sati1979]

Er...guys - this is a spoof. LOL!

The director doesn't exist (I would've thought his surname 'Giallo' would have been a huge clue as it is the term that is often used to describe some Italian horror) and neither does the film.

The only Italian director to have been brought up on charges was Ruggero Deodato for his film 'Cannibal Holocaust'.

[retrovertigo]

This film in fact DOES exist, it is available through the website. Check you facts before flapping your lips next time.

[Sati1979]

I did. Do you not understand the concept of satire? The whole film is a satire - spoof of the 'Mondo' Italian cannibal films (Cannibal Holocaust, Cannibal Ferox, etc). The website is a joke and so are the reviews for this film - it wasn't fucking made in 1979 and the director does not exist! Are you seriously *that* stupid??

Maybe you should check your facts before you open your arsehole to respond to a comment you aren't able to comprehend. Dickhead.

[retrovertigo]

jesus h.... Let me go slowly here so you can absorb what Im saying.

Yes, I understand the concept of satire.Yes this film is a satire of the Italian Giallo films. Considering the fact that I WORKED on this film would clue me in to that. It would also give me the authority to confirm that the film EXISTS, and the reviews are quite real...go to Screem magazine if you think Im lying.

Retard.

[Sati1979]

Okay, I'll try and be more articulate so that you might try and understand...I am not disputing that this pile of shit you label a 'film' exists. I am disputing the fact that it was allegedly 'banned' and that it was made in 1979. And that a director named 'Antonello Giallo' exists....seriously, with a name as 'stereotypical' as that - I'm surprised he's not called 'Antonionionio Spaghetti-O'.

[retrovertigo]

Yeah, keep trying to backpedal.First you said the film doesn't exist, now you say you dont dispute that it does. That was the original argument, stupid, dont try to spin it into something else. As far as your opinion, calling it a pile of shit probably nailed it right on the head. This movie was never meant to be taken seriously...as evidenced in the reviews you say are fake.The obviousness of it all was done on PURPOSE.

[retrovertigo]

Since you seem so knowledgeable about the genre, I would have thought you would have caught on by now....but like I said before, you are apparently a little on the slow side.

[Sati1979]

Maybe you should try to engage your brain before responding to comments left here. You still haven't understood my posts. I feel for your mother - I really do.

[Sati1979]

Okay. Let me state what my point was, because you really didn't get it did you? I accept that this film (which is a blatant parody) may be genuine (I did check the website) but the supposed 'fact' about it having been 'banned' is a load of BS. Do you understand me now? We have moved on. You accuse me of 'backpedaling' but you have missed the point of my argument. Can you confirm that this film was banned? Can you confirm the director is really named Antonello Giallo or whatever the name was??

[retrovertigo]

Jesus H Christ.

Your orignal statements were that the film, the director, and the reviews did not exist. I never even argued with you over the authenticity of Antonello Giallo, or whether the film was "banned" or not. Why would I, when myself and anyone who has actually seen this film could see that is quite fucking OBVIOUS to the contrary?Read all of the former posts and my opinions should be quite clear. Can you read? Is that why you took 3 months to respond was was obviously a moot point?

[retrovertigo]

Regardless, the whole movie is in good fun.Maybe part of the fun for viewers is thinking it is real at first, then having that "wait a minute..." moment.Its not made for that douchebag who just doesnt get the irony, and feels the need to ruin it for everybody else by spitting out their "expertise" for everyone who doesnt care; i.e. people like YOU.

[Sati1979]

Try and make the effort to understand my previous posts and in particular the words 'engage' & 'brain'. And no, the film's satire is blatantly obvious from the trailer, so there is no 'wait a minute' moment. Also, the irony here, is that you are attacking the ONLY user on here who gets the joke.

[Sati1979]

I admit that I was WRONG when I first commented that the film wasn't 'real' because, after having seen the trailer I assumed that everything about it was a complete joke.

I then decided to point this out to the OTHER USERS on here, who were under the impression that this film had really been banned.

[Sati1979]

YOU then decided to take it upon yourself to come on here and give a (rather rude) response to my first comment. I don't know if you have been able to make the effort to READ this yourself, but I did actually STATE in a previous comment that I was no longer DISPUTING the film's authenticity with you. I thought we had resolved that issue.

Oh, and the the reason why I took 3 months to respond is because I have a life.

[retrovertigo]

You apparently are a walking contradiction.If the satire was so obvious, why did you feel the need to point it out to the other users on here, or claim that you were the ONLY user who got the joke?Like I stated before, you are "that guy", the douche who ruins it for everybody.

Nevertheless, admitting you are wrong is the first step.You conceded to my argument,thats good enough for me.

[bigjohnstone]

lol

[bigjohnstone]

lol

[monte68x]

I can see why it was banned. It looks completely retarded.