Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
Because of the concept that science is the search for truth and science has unfailingly lead us to atheism. He doesn't care if you personally want to believe in whatever religion you want, but when your religious beliefs effect politics, science, education, and society you have to have some sort of proof that it is truth and not opinion.
Atheist, are hypocrites. Because they have made a stand of faith, there is no evidence to prove "no God" so if they stood true to what they believe, they can have no opinion about God, because it can't be proven either way.
Atheism is the default position. I'm an atheist untill you can prove there's a god. I'm not going to say that pink unicorns MAY exist simple because I can't disprove them. You do reach a point where an absence of evidence IS evidence of absence.
The greatest mind on earth (scientists) must think beyond facts. They generate a hypothesis; one must push the boundaries of facts into an area beyond known facts to a place of the expanded mind. This is a regular practice among the intellect. To bad you are unable or unwilling to do this. Einstein was able to push decades beyond the known facts; he was ahead of his time. Just like those that know there is a God. It is thru inductive reasoning that some of us come to this conclusion.
I'm a little confused, are you in agreement or are you being sarcastic? It seems as if you are having a hard time with this concept. A hypothesis is a movement beyond fact that needs to be proven. That's what scientific testing is attempting to establish, it tries to prove what was once an untested thought. Without this action there would be no intellectual advancement.
You're correct to say it cannot be proven either way. But why is the burden of proof on the atheists? I'm sure you've heard of Russell's teapot. Is it not as likely as an all-seeing, all-knowing, all-powerful deity who nonetheless allows horrible things to happen to the undeserving yet still asks our love? It is one thing to philosophically contend that God exists, but it is exasperating to atheists that this religion is ingrained in children who are too young to ponder such things on their own.
We can't prove X is not true, therefor we can have no opinion on X.
X could be God, Yahwey, Thor, Jesus, Zues, Fairies, the Flying Spagetti Monster.
But, do we REALLY need PROOF to have and opinion? I don't have proof, but I think the Red WIngs are a good hockey teem. I DO have some EVIDENCE that they are. So I hold that OPINION.
Likewise, there is good evidence that the likelyhood of there being a god is quiet low. So, I hold that OPION.
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
I love Dawkins, but what's with these questions? They could do better than this.
ZachRose88 5 months ago
these are awful presenters its a wierd interview
walliebazoom 1 year ago
the girl radio host's voice gave me an erection
thefutureboom 2 years ago 9
She must be really, really, ridiculously good looking.
lanceawatt 2 years ago
In fact that's why Richard forgets what he's talking about at 2:40, he blushing lol!
lanceawatt 2 years ago
@thefutureboom LMAO so true
AxiomSpagMonster 1 year ago
i cant tell yet why he wants people to convert to atheism,
by the end of the book to be atheists, err why?
tobiosnmakky 2 years ago
@tobiosnmakky
Because of the concept that science is the search for truth and science has unfailingly lead us to atheism. He doesn't care if you personally want to believe in whatever religion you want, but when your religious beliefs effect politics, science, education, and society you have to have some sort of proof that it is truth and not opinion.
hobodoctor 2 years ago 3
I wish Dawkins was my grandad
ExtremeBogom 2 years ago 4
You have Dawkins, I'll have Hitchens as my dad, then we can be friends!
hendigon 2 years ago
Hehehe
ExtremeBogom 2 years ago
A giant Aardvark named Ronald created the Universe.
...Can you disprove him Creationists? No? Therefore he exists. I win.
Pray to Ronald.
TAz69x 2 years ago 4
Who is that woman on the radio station jointly conducting the interview? It sounds terribly like Ann Druyan, don't you think?
jtbovis 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Atheist, are hypocrites. Because they have made a stand of faith, there is no evidence to prove "no God" so if they stood true to what they believe, they can have no opinion about God, because it can't be proven either way.
questioneverything2 4 years ago
Atheism is the default position. I'm an atheist untill you can prove there's a god. I'm not going to say that pink unicorns MAY exist simple because I can't disprove them. You do reach a point where an absence of evidence IS evidence of absence.
Scrapheap71 4 years ago 19
The greatest mind on earth (scientists) must think beyond facts. They generate a hypothesis; one must push the boundaries of facts into an area beyond known facts to a place of the expanded mind. This is a regular practice among the intellect. To bad you are unable or unwilling to do this. Einstein was able to push decades beyond the known facts; he was ahead of his time. Just like those that know there is a God. It is thru inductive reasoning that some of us come to this conclusion.
questioneverything2 4 years ago
"The greatest mind on earth (scientists) must think beyond facts" LOL that cheered me up, thanks!
lonelyboy8800 3 years ago
I'm a little confused, are you in agreement or are you being sarcastic? It seems as if you are having a hard time with this concept. A hypothesis is a movement beyond fact that needs to be proven. That's what scientific testing is attempting to establish, it tries to prove what was once an untested thought. Without this action there would be no intellectual advancement.
questioneverything2 3 years ago
You're correct to say it cannot be proven either way. But why is the burden of proof on the atheists? I'm sure you've heard of Russell's teapot. Is it not as likely as an all-seeing, all-knowing, all-powerful deity who nonetheless allows horrible things to happen to the undeserving yet still asks our love? It is one thing to philosophically contend that God exists, but it is exasperating to atheists that this religion is ingrained in children who are too young to ponder such things on their own.
srb1369 3 years ago
That's good, now thing that thru a bit:
We can't prove X is not true, therefor we can have no opinion on X.
X could be God, Yahwey, Thor, Jesus, Zues, Fairies, the Flying Spagetti Monster.
But, do we REALLY need PROOF to have and opinion? I don't have proof, but I think the Red WIngs are a good hockey teem. I DO have some EVIDENCE that they are. So I hold that OPINION.
Likewise, there is good evidence that the likelyhood of there being a god is quiet low. So, I hold that OPION.
stevekap8 2 years ago
Neat! Haven't heard this one yet. And it's cool that it comes from before the God Delusion was published in the US.
AbbeyNormal 4 years ago