I believe you are somewhere to the right of the normal distribution graph, probably somewhere near 6.9 billion, if we were to make such a graph for "helpful people".
I doubt i am the first person to comment on this but your comment on all of the atoms arranging themselves so that you can fall through your chair is actually not unlikely its impossible because of the electromagnetic forces between the electrons repelling one another. Not being a stickler im just bored haha
@brandex24 according to quantum mechanics there is a small chance that it can happen. very very very very very small. but still a probability nonetheless
Is the Cumulative Distribution Function a Logistic Function with carrying capacity 100% or does it just look like one? I am not sure, because it seems to copy the typical shape, but I can conjure up no substantiation as for why it should be that way.
I have a question that i need help with. The question goes...."The scores on a statistics examination are normally distributed with a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 10. Calculate the following probabilities:
A. The lielihood that scores will be less than 50.
My question is for the z- score ...would it be (z--1) thus P(z<1) + .3413, or would I have to subtract that from .5?
1:35-2:00: In a probability distribution of a continous variable, shown by the normal distribution curve, is it impossible, not correct, or simply not the job of the normal distribution curve to approximate the probability of obtaining a discrete integer value (i.e., a number on the x-axis)?
Thank you so much for uploading this video! I'm in a high school Algebra 3/Statistics class right now, and my teacher didn't explain the normal distribution concept very clearly. I'm definitely using your video to help prepare myself for the final exam! :D
I am a political science major. I should not go deeper on this stuff. I can argue all my life about why me not taking Statistics class but I need it to graduate. So thank you! I am very very thankful you made this.
Call me stupid but why do you have to use the cumulative distribution function to work out the area under the curve? Why not just evaluate it on the normal distribution as it is?
It is helping me to grasp the basics. I wonder if you have any plans to explain this in SPSS format. Universities have this nasty habit to stuff stats down your throat even if you do not want to become a statistician nor a researcher. Your KISS approach is appreciated.
Hey Sal, great series so far on statistics. Hope to see more videos in this series soon! I'd especially like to see you continue with normal distributions with some examples of when it's appropriate to assume a normal distribution and when it isn't. I think that will be a big help for people that want to apply the normal distribution to some particular phenomena they are studying, or scrutinize someone else's application of it. Thanks!!!
I find these videos very helpful. Even though, I am a PhD student, it is a nice refreshment of Statistics. Does anybody know if there are more of the videos on Statistics from Khan Academy. Khan mentions in these video another lecture on the Z-score, but I do not see any on youtube and neither his website. Thanks in advance. Dobromir
@dobromir2102 hello Dobromir, it is 2 years since you have seen this video, but i hope you still have your positive attitude for Statistics! anyways, to find the video you are looking for press Ctrl and f, and type in the keyword you wish to search for. In your case, i used standard deviation as my key words, and it brought me to the statistics section. In the section there is an intro to normal distribution. under that, you have z-score. Hope i helped! reply if you have any questions.
Sal... super video by thw way... Dont mean to get involved but maybe this guy should do some research into the example you said about your atoms falling through a chair if he wants an extreme example... What I am interested in is you continuing this idea into the central limit theorem and also some of the financial examples you said you may do.... I am starting to see how this could be used to value options or the intrisic value of an financial instrument....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Human height is a normal distribution? So, the probability of a human having a height less than or equal to zero is actually a defined real positive value? And yet is impossible at the same time. It makes the normal distribution confusing and meaningless, essentially.
the normal distribution is a class of distributions that have the same basic shape but different means and std deviations. Human height is probably close to a normal distribution with the mean around 5'6 (somewhere in between men and women average).
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I dont think you get what I was saying. Your response might be a valid response, but it neither constitutes an answer nor is it even relevant to what I said.
It's an approximation to the probability, and it's usually a very good one. The probability you speak of is obviously 0, and using the normal curve on a height range so far from the average (like 22 SDs) would give an unbelievably small probability. What's the problem with that?
If you want the exact probability for a height range, you're welcome to go measure every person on Earth. Most people would be satisfied with using the normal curve.
@CogitoErgoCogitoSum what is referred to as the "standard normal distribution" has a mean = 0 not the normal distribution model of height. We use this standard model because it is a premade probability model which so we don't have to calculate the probabilities of height.
If you did statistics in high school, this might come up.
Don't worry though, if you spend more than half an hour on it, or work backwards in the maths you need to understand (try an elementary stats textbook from your local library) this will quickly come under your power to manipulate.
Most students in high school (or at least mine and my cousin's) don't take statistics since it is mainly a college course. They offer the AP statistics exam for high school students who want to get ahead.
Great Introduction. :)
strawberryswift 2 weeks ago
this is still super difficult and its the most important important one.
THE16THPHANTOM 1 month ago
LOL. this is too much for me. Maybe i should switch to the videos of Normal Distribution problems because I know nothing about Calculus YET!
Saronaist 1 month ago in playlist Learn
thanks a ton for all the teachers and staff team at Khan Academy!
pradeepknal 2 months ago
I believe you are somewhere to the right of the normal distribution graph, probably somewhere near 6.9 billion, if we were to make such a graph for "helpful people".
DivinityFaith 3 months ago
I doubt i am the first person to comment on this but your comment on all of the atoms arranging themselves so that you can fall through your chair is actually not unlikely its impossible because of the electromagnetic forces between the electrons repelling one another. Not being a stickler im just bored haha
brandex24 5 months ago
@brandex24 according to quantum mechanics there is a small chance that it can happen. very very very very very small. but still a probability nonetheless
pleasepardonyourself 4 months ago
at 16:12 I think it's e^(x+5/200)² instead of e^(x+5/100)² :)
dealerbuttons 5 months ago
When i watched this video and finally understood the normal distribution, my atoms re-arranged themselves and i fell through my seat....
Br3nD0g 6 months ago
Is the Cumulative Distribution Function a Logistic Function with carrying capacity 100% or does it just look like one? I am not sure, because it seems to copy the typical shape, but I can conjure up no substantiation as for why it should be that way.
BeGunNer 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get a good friendship with good girls naneedj.info
you are the only solution for bbw naneedj.info
krish8253 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Worth watching..!!! Thanks...!!!
shibubera 10 months ago
I have a question that i need help with. The question goes...."The scores on a statistics examination are normally distributed with a mean of 60 and a standard deviation of 10. Calculate the following probabilities:
A. The lielihood that scores will be less than 50.
My question is for the z- score ...would it be (z--1) thus P(z<1) + .3413, or would I have to subtract that from .5?
MrAgoose 10 months ago
Sal, you are so awesome to open up this world of knowledge to anyone interested in learning. Thank you!
OddsDiva 10 months ago
1:35-2:00: In a probability distribution of a continous variable, shown by the normal distribution curve, is it impossible, not correct, or simply not the job of the normal distribution curve to approximate the probability of obtaining a discrete integer value (i.e., a number on the x-axis)?
MasterThief1324 11 months ago
Also I find it very helpful thanks khanacademy.
where can I fnd more videos?
NaserNazary 1 year ago
Wonderful video. Loved it, thaks a lot!
mattstiehl 1 year ago
Help! Can't download the xls files!
V2PRC 1 year ago
Thank you so much for uploading this video! I'm in a high school Algebra 3/Statistics class right now, and my teacher didn't explain the normal distribution concept very clearly. I'm definitely using your video to help prepare myself for the final exam! :D
hardtrancelover92 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Most excellent Asian lady **busizz4me.info**
intakhabsohail 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
do you need hot and fast date get it now bbw naneedj.info
amalsee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
naneedj.info I am looking for a man with good values
MrSabeetha 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Naughty women in the lane benaughtyman.info
yasanthiponseeka 1 year ago
are you the guy from ancient aliens?
Pmarz15 1 year ago
wow, that part of linking normal distri to 'nothing is impossible, but the probability matters' is awesome.. deep...
sasamuraki 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Online women for dating gettop5.info
KeeneBarajas 1 year ago
thanks so much for this.
muzic29 1 year ago
I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS ª!!!!! KEEP DOING MORE PLEASE :)
xtruder02 1 year ago
I am a political science major. I should not go deeper on this stuff. I can argue all my life about why me not taking Statistics class but I need it to graduate. So thank you! I am very very thankful you made this.
kukujos 1 year ago
trappezzoid? naah your gud
aer9998 1 year ago
Call me stupid but why do you have to use the cumulative distribution function to work out the area under the curve? Why not just evaluate it on the normal distribution as it is?
MrPlender 1 year ago
@MrPlender BECAUSE you do not have an area x>0 , you will not get nothing... if you just evaluate the function, that means nothing...
xtruder02 1 year ago
Thank you very much Mr Khan.
The best tutorial ever.
sajn0001 1 year ago
OMG! I am so blessed to have the Graphic Calculator (GC) ! I just need to press and i can get the answer. I am using TI-84 silver edition GC
haloapa 1 year ago
AH! I found this video! great!
haloapa 1 year ago
You are Jesus.
captainbeatle 1 year ago
But mistake at 15:52, it's not sigma^2, just sigma, since the exponent's already outside the parentheses.
captainbeatle 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
terrible demonstration
NCAD 1 year ago
Thanks Sal... Can u make some videos on Birth and Death Processes and markov chain and series. thanks...
sumitece87 2 years ago
Thanks. Well explained!
Dermiitti 2 years ago 3
Hi there.
It is helping me to grasp the basics. I wonder if you have any plans to explain this in SPSS format. Universities have this nasty habit to stuff stats down your throat even if you do not want to become a statistician nor a researcher. Your KISS approach is appreciated.
mishkail01 2 years ago
You are fabulous. By the way, at which college or university do you teach. Thank you.
mujimax007 2 years ago
great work! thank you.
mohit01985 2 years ago
This tutorial reduced my fears to zero, feel a lot better now!
TajikThunderstorm 2 years ago
Excellent tutorial. Simple and clear.
Just as feedback : It's gonna be perfect if you speak a bit slowly, specially for non-english viewers.
masoodghasemzadeh 2 years ago
I wish i had youtube when I was in school...wud have learned a lot of things better.
talentokie 2 years ago
Can you post video in Probability about Moment & Correlation please
salemali83 2 years ago
Hey Sal, great series so far on statistics. Hope to see more videos in this series soon! I'd especially like to see you continue with normal distributions with some examples of when it's appropriate to assume a normal distribution and when it isn't. I think that will be a big help for people that want to apply the normal distribution to some particular phenomena they are studying, or scrutinize someone else's application of it. Thanks!!!
DanMan7997 2 years ago 3
If I wanted to know how much worse my eye sight is getting.
vkgoku2012 2 years ago
Hi guys,
I find these videos very helpful. Even though, I am a PhD student, it is a nice refreshment of Statistics. Does anybody know if there are more of the videos on Statistics from Khan Academy. Khan mentions in these video another lecture on the Z-score, but I do not see any on youtube and neither his website. Thanks in advance. Dobromir
dobromir2102 2 years ago 22
@dobromir2102 hello Dobromir, it is 2 years since you have seen this video, but i hope you still have your positive attitude for Statistics! anyways, to find the video you are looking for press Ctrl and f, and type in the keyword you wish to search for. In your case, i used standard deviation as my key words, and it brought me to the statistics section. In the section there is an intro to normal distribution. under that, you have z-score. Hope i helped! reply if you have any questions.
-Wasfi
MrAwesomeAsian22 3 months ago
Sal... super video by thw way... Dont mean to get involved but maybe this guy should do some research into the example you said about your atoms falling through a chair if he wants an extreme example... What I am interested in is you continuing this idea into the central limit theorem and also some of the financial examples you said you may do.... I am starting to see how this could be used to value options or the intrisic value of an financial instrument....
Jakers2009 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Human height is a normal distribution? So, the probability of a human having a height less than or equal to zero is actually a defined real positive value? And yet is impossible at the same time. It makes the normal distribution confusing and meaningless, essentially.
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 2 years ago
the normal distribution is a class of distributions that have the same basic shape but different means and std deviations. Human height is probably close to a normal distribution with the mean around 5'6 (somewhere in between men and women average).
khanacademy 2 years ago 12
Comment removed
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dont think you get what I was saying. Your response might be a valid response, but it neither constitutes an answer nor is it even relevant to what I said.
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I was criticizing the normal distribution for providing probability values for impossibilities.
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 2 years ago
It's an approximation to the probability, and it's usually a very good one. The probability you speak of is obviously 0, and using the normal curve on a height range so far from the average (like 22 SDs) would give an unbelievably small probability. What's the problem with that?
If you want the exact probability for a height range, you're welcome to go measure every person on Earth. Most people would be satisfied with using the normal curve.
honeybbqgrundle 2 years ago 2
@khanacademy Your response in no way reflects my original post or its concerns.
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 1 year ago
Comment removed
aludood 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CogitoErgoCogitoSum what is referred to as the "standard normal distribution" has a mean = 0 not the normal distribution model of height. We use this standard model because it is a premade probability model which so we don't have to calculate the probabilities of height.
aludood 2 months ago
Thank you very much Khan,
Wishing U & ur Family
Best of Health & Happiness
tenshady 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
this video sucks, this one watch?v=_Q2Upi9EIdU is way better!
dsgI0p 2 years ago
Comment removed
chaigeorge101 2 years ago
That's very interesting
Person514cs 2 years ago 3
Great video, it is helping me prepare for the AP.
wwwdotLPdotorg 2 years ago
what level is this lesson??? please don't say high school!!!
AlbiCollier 2 years ago
If you did statistics in high school, this might come up.
Don't worry though, if you spend more than half an hour on it, or work backwards in the maths you need to understand (try an elementary stats textbook from your local library) this will quickly come under your power to manipulate.
Watch some more videos!
Tehcarp 2 years ago
AlbiCollier
Most students in high school (or at least mine and my cousin's) don't take statistics since it is mainly a college course. They offer the AP statistics exam for high school students who want to get ahead.
wwwdotLPdotorg 2 years ago
best channel ever.
djkadirtube 2 years ago
You have the gift.
norwayte 2 years ago