Added: 5 years ago
From: mercy1313
Views: 6,521
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Whitexyz

    very good point, but how can you explain - regardless of time - that she says the building has collapsed and yet the building is right behind her still standing? use some common sense

  • Of course we shot down the PA plane. How else do you get an engine to be found miles away from the crash site?

    It's called a heat-seeker blowing an engine off the wing.

  • Listen to me this was put out at 6:00pm EST, i know because i worked there!!!!! It wasnt at 500pm EST, it was 600pm EST

  • Please explain how this proves anything? There is NO PROOF WHATSOEVER that this was broadcast at 5:00 P.M. This would be laughed out of any courtroom.

  • Folks, this video has been around for over a year and is not a conspiracy at all. It is actually well after 6:00pm EST not 5:00pm like they want you to believe.

    The reporter is simply standing in front of a blue screen that is playing a previously recorded video on it. On the left side of the video you will clearly see a vertical white line which is the edge of the viewing screen. To the left of that line you will see an actual live shot of NY with a gloomy building standing there.

  • nice work mate

  • So, shawnalovis you where on the planes and you yourself saw a bunch of Arabs fly the planes into the buildings? Or are you just working off info you saw reported on T.V.? You are just as guilty as the rest of us for talking about something that we can never ever prove or disprove.

  • this is the most retarded video ever. i was there... u want 911 truth- a bunch of arabs flew planes into buildings. thats real.

  • This video is simply proof that they were aware the building was going to collapse. So they reported the story early! So what? It's amazing the news media got as much correct on that day that they did.

  • MGR1900, Very interesting! There seems to be Silver Bullett terms which make you stop cold and back down quickly. You change direction immediately when you see them. Hmmmm? You need to reread the shill handbook! Remember you need to prove yourself to move up from Wannabe Debunker status!

  • The main thing is the USA got its arse kicked.... As sad as it is... We can all learn a lesson from that. Show me the WMD and I'll show you an honest USA... LOL.

  • i once reported to everyone in my car that it was out of gas. They could clearly see the trees whizzing by so my statement was ludicrous. Then when the car stopped rolling and it wouldn't restart they accused me of being part of a vast conspiracy and I jumped the gun on a "script" I said, naaa the car was sputtering. They still think it was proof of evilness. RETARDS!

  • Common sense guys. When they talked about pulling the building, they meant pulling the firemen from the building because they knew they couldn't control the fire. Helllooo! Wake up and quit misinterpreting words to fit your theory.

  • Are you people blind ? The BBC reported that the tower fell, not was going to fall. CNN did too, but then said sorry fro their mistake. The BBC obviously didn't know what twoer 7 looked like ! This news was part of the 'script' given that day, and the BBc cocked up, or deliberately leaked the news to mess the conspirator's plot up so in the future as now, people would find out. Ask Larry, he had it demolished, but takes 3 weeks to prepare a building for demolision....figure it out.

  • Prove the BBC clips were broadcast at the times you claim. Also, show me the buildings still standing behind the lady, even though she's blocking the view.

  • Gladly.

    1 - The BBC has already admitted they announced it 20 minutes early, you can go to their website and verify this.

    2 - Look for this time-code video on youtube: "WTC7- BBC Time-Code Shows 4:54 N.Y. Time"

    3 - At 2:12 she steps out of the way, and you can CLEARLY see WTC7 standing there (the arrows point at it) and when she steps back into view, you can see it over her shoulder for the rest of her air-time.

  • @drpepper0911

    regardless of what time she said it, she clearly said "the building collapsed" and when she stepped out the way it was still there. i think people who don't admit that this was very suspicious are blind to the realities of control being thrust upon us

  • this is just like the whispering-game (you whisper something and whens it´s passed to several people the message gets distorted -nothing strange about that). The BBC was told is was going to collapse but missunderstood.

    /Sorry about my english

  • The fact of the matter is the engineers knew hours ahead of time building #7 was in danger of collapsing. So the BBC reporters got the some erroneous info. Who cares? Considering the events that day, it was amazing they got right what they did. For all you conspiracy theorists who are chasing shadows implying that the BBC must have been in on some conspiracy, get a life!

  • MGR0000 your are getting too easy to find! Slime Ball wannbe debunker! one just needs to pick up a the right rock and there you are! Look it's a Shill!

  • i'm tellin you, its the time zones fault. europe knew the building fell 5 hours before anyone in nyc did. hawaii didnt find out till dinner time. i'm sure tokyo reported the collapse monday morning, but who listens to them anyway?

  • You're just repeating what I pointed out was the weakness to your argument. Try again!

  • ver, telling me to f myself is no way to win an argument. In fact, it shows weakness. Why don't you just start crying like a little baby and throw a tantrum? This is your way of proving your point? Name calling is the first tell tale sign you feel you're losing a discussion. I don't have to you to go f yourself? Why? Because my point is made. You're proving your point to be erronious. Insults are all you have left.

  • According to debunking911, they already knew hours earlier that the building was going to collapse. It wouldn't be a big deal, considering the events of the day, that someone misreported it. The reporter also didn't know which building it was otherwise she would have mentioned it. So whatever conclusion you're trying to reach, you have failed.

  • The media also reported, in the early minutes, that a small plane ran into the WTC for the longest time. Geez, I guess you're going to stick with that story also. Go to debunking911 and its' all explained for you. As far as you being a snobby Eurowimp, you're on your own with that one.

  • And not one reporter for any newspaper or tv network has come forward with this little timing problem. Oh, but some conspiracy theorist on the internet has come forward. God, I'm glad the truth has come out!

  • Explain.

  • This video is a hodge podge of misinformation.

  • MGR0000 you are a hodge podge of disinformation!

    Wannabe debunker!

  • Mental problems, buddy!

  • MGR1900 your not making a very impressive shill!

  • Actually checkdaspin, I have accurate information. I deal in facts while you deal in fantasy. And you are an internet stalker to boot! You apparently have no life whatsoever.

  • trying to explain what is wrong with this video isn't worth my time...

  • Where's the time stamp on the video? Not the one the video producer put on there. I'm talking about the real one. Until I see that, this video doesn't impress me.

  • MGR0000 What a schmuck you are! Wannabe! Tell everyone about the debunker site you are logged into!

    Tell everyone how they think you are a reverse shill!

  • checkdagate, dude. You are seriously wacked. You're an internet stalker. Get help. You are following me around Youtube like a pervert stalker. Dude, get a life!

  • checkdagate, you have mental problems.

  • MGR0000 to quote you: "coming from someone like you I'll take that as a compliment". OK! now run to the next post to spread the trash you love to post! Worm!

  • people are blamin it on times, cant blame it on that, jus cus there is a time difference doesnt meant they are living in the past. I think this is a great video. really gets you thinking.

  • yeah, lets try and blame it on daylight savings time.. so, just ignore the fact that shes saying the building has collapsed, even though its still standing right behind her.. so, the building actually has collapsed, but, you cant see that it has collapsed, because the time is EDT instead of EST.. it all makes sense now!

  • Fuck off wha huh-wat r u who whats goin on yer really ticked arent u-but we do know its comin from, well, U. so update me on the situation so i may have success in bringing u further from grace-if yer atheist-& one day happens-dontugochangin stay strong understand the rebellion-ill be yer fool-im thinkin bout u-its up to u-will i be back-luv sum h8 u gotta know what i want-u may....?leave it alone?

  • why r u still alive? BOO!-just kiddin man just stay where u r n itll b alright ? not. sleepytown, USA

  • what?

  • huh?

  • what the fuck that video just turned me into a government fearing hippie that is like the craziest shit ever

  • interesting...but the clips they showed after the BBC one seemed to be reaching. If I heard "there had been such a loss of life, we decided to pull", that would tell me it was time to pull any firemen that were in the building out of it as a precaution.

    The explosions sounding like gunfire doesn't add up either. I have no doubt that the hugest building in the world falling down floor by floor would sound just like explosions...HUGE ones. That doesn't mean there were explosives used.

  • i'm an engineer and trust me there were no explosions or conspiracies. this video is manipulating the truth...for peets sake people watch the video of bin laden bragging about doing this and how he planned for the buildings to collapse. this building was over a 1000 feet tall just use common sense and dont buy into all this crap.how come they never found any explosive residue in all that wreckage ya smuck. next your gonna say bin laden and usa are working together

  • two things to say to that:

    1- the FBI has stated that Osama "is not Wanted for 9/11" because there is "no hard evidence linking him to the attacks" so, apparently the FBI doesn't believe the confession tape to be real.

    2- the Bin Laden family is in oil business with the Bush family, and has been for decades, you fool.

  • will u loudly call me a fool once a day pleez. not joking, takes no tym & itll feel good, the more even. it still is comin from sleepytown or, U. dont seek 4 deeper knowledge, just be manipulated in all the convenient new found knowledge-& ill be yer fool, ohh GOD-DOUBLE-DAMED,-gimme some h8-luv ya-stay in the circle yer givin-yes ur a self thinker, now get back n line & react.

  • stay asleeeeepp-zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • Let me guess. The BBC is in on the conspiracy also. This is stupid.

  • We are not slaves of the state, God or society. We are self-owning sovereign-human-beings. Our rights are derived from the axiom of self-ownership. The non-aggression axiom follows from this!

    An axiom is a premise that can not be denied. It is self-evidently true. In order to try to deny it explicitly, it is necessary to assume it implicitly.

    Study the "self-ownership axiom" and teach your friends the same. All together now. We are self-owning sovereign-human-beings. We own our own lives!

  • Nice video. Love the quirky techno music.

  • obviously??? someone with power is obviously leaking early prompters of psychological pre-conditioning... who issued the memo? Everyone wake up to how a few can play around with the truth in the minds of many... it isnt paranoia, i have learnt that this life has many wars occuring on different spheres. Questioning is better than believing. Isnt this journalism unscrupulously brain conditioning then?

  • they screwed up big time obviously.

  • I agree, it's obvious a misocmmunication is possible, when I think of a plane hitting something I believe it will fall. Furthermore, as predicting that the WTC would fall vertically an impossibility unless organized is going under the assumption that something compeltely similar would happen before.

  • They screwed up only in the sense that they reported the news that was already known was going to happen. It was known for hours the building was going to fall. Considering the crazyness of that day and the minute by minute changing news stories, it isn't that unbelievable that they prematurely reported a story. Did they screw up? Yes. Did they screw up big time? No. That's a little too sensational. The implication here is that they knew something therefore proving a conspiracy! WRONG!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more