the Mein Kampf of the 21st century, Get it, The Pentagon purpose is not to protect our sovereignty but to spread globalism with bloodshed, the conquering of those economies that arent swallowed in the Globalist debt trap Libya, Iran is next, those primitive misguided fools adhear to an outdated concept the Usury is bad, so we shall murder them into submission, Thank Obama and Hitlery
so , all what this guy is speaking about is democracy . And as we know democracy is atheism brought to it's peak. democracy is when you are allowed to get married with a dog, and that's why some people want democracy so much. very democratic american democracy, when america does what it wants to do , and other nations are due to listen to what america has to say about their actions and if they are not assumed to be currect then do what america wants
LOL! He said, If we can sneak Obama in this year (2008) "life will get much better"... He messed-up big time on that prediction. Obama took all the bad stuff of Bush and turbo charged it!
Just my personal observation, don't take me too seriously ... Think for yourselves, fair enough? :)
@Ganderco Examples? I would say the Obama administration's handling for foreign affairs is much better than the Bush Administration's. His handling of Libya so far seems to have been exactly how this guy seems to advocate. The continuation of the PATRIOT Act, the continuation of Guantanamo, and stuff like that is not what this guy suggests though.
In the words of the presenter he is very confident in view of the world and the trends he sees. As he notes no one will listen to a wishy washy grand strategist.
Whether you think globilization is positive or not, think on this. The UK,France,Germany, Russia are all prosperous and peaceful. China, Japan, South Korea, and India are all growing in economic power and yet no war between these powers.
Globilization has gone from a supply push to a demand pull by emerging economic countries.
This is the first time Ive seen it admiited that the British Empire used intelligence methods and financial corruption to "co-opt" the United States and "punch above its weight.". What was WW II and the cold war all about anyway, did it have anything to do with the health and safety of the American people, did Iraq GBU have anything either to do wiht UD oil interests, or r we the cannon fodder of BP-Shell?
* "Regions, countries, and groups feeling left behind will face deepening economic stagnation, political instability, and cultural alienation. They will foster political, ethnic, ideological, and religious extremism, along with the violence that often accompanies it".
"Most countries that embrace global free trade are single party state systems".....the financial ideology of dictatorship......"the Balkan intervention was highly successful , how long will it be till we see Iraqi peacekeepers"....all mass violence of the system pccurs in the states outside the core.....intervention by the core against ehe no core.
"In contrast to the Industrial Revolution, the process of globalization is more compressed. Its evolution will be rocky, marked by chronic financial volatility and a widening economic divide".
He's just saying the US enslaves people in the Third World. The policy has been to keep the Third World in poverty for the benefit of US multinational corporations.
Any threat to US corporate and power interests in the Third World is crushed by terror, tyranny, and economic strangulation.
We're supposed to believe countries like Nicaragua are a threat to the super power becouse they're economy isnt being exploited by US multinational corporations.
That's what he's promoting. He's not going to come out and say..
"The major threat to US interests is the trend in Latin America toward nationalistic regimes that respond to popular demand for immediate improvement in the low living standards of the masses and for production geared to domestic needs".
"The US is committed to encouraging a climate conducive to private investment, and must encuraoge the Latin American countries to base their economies on a system of private enterprise, and, as essential thereto, to create a political and economic climate conducive to private investment of both domestic and foreign capital, including guarantees for the opportunity to earn and in the case of foreign capital to repatriate a reasonable return."
No, he didn't. Horhey summarised it beautifully. You can refer to a US military report on unconventional warfare that flat out supports the use of terrorism as a useful political tool, just as the PNAC report said that race-specific bioweapons should be legitimized as a political tool.
Don't let Positroniks speed and authority confuse you. Read carefully what he says and question his words. Ask yourself why he makes assertions without any evidence to back them up and why he offers his opinion up as though it were fact.
He uses plenty of evidence, especially in the question answer section. He can only offer up so much in an hour. This is really the cliff notes of what he says in his books. You could read his books that are full of evidence. Also his blog has data and sources.
You don't like his ideas, so you come up with a straw man argument: "he doesn't offer evidence." You don't have to agree with him, but if you were actually paying attention you'd notice loads of examples, precedents, and data.
Don't let the speed and authority of this man's speech confuse you. Listen carefully to what he says and question his words. Ask yourself why he makes assertions without any evidence to back them up and why he offers his opinion up as though it were fact. He speaks of freemarkets as if any actually exist free of government regulation. He is a warmonger and economic hitman and he and his ilk will be the ruin of liberty and human civilization as we know them.
He likes government regulation in markets. He talks about rule-sets for trade and markets extensively. I guess you missed the part about the food trade and regulations. You missed the part about the 1400 banking principals. You missed the part about the interoperability of ports trough standards. You missed the part about business helping developing countries come up with a legal system.
Unlike you he realizes that economic connectivity, jobs, opportunity, rules, etc., lead to liberty.
It's extremely difficult to disagree with this guy. Frankly, I hate soft leftists like Sean Penn who can't seem to see the connection between free markets and their success. On the other hand, there are "conservatives" (old time isolationalists) who can't see the connection between religious flourishing and freedom of religion, for example. This guy shuts the bastards up quite nicely....hence some youtube comments asking for "evidence."
oh cool the newHITLER please somone can kill these son of a bitch
mrinkognit 4 days ago
This piece of filth is just a messenger boy, he obvious is somebody little soldier, this military expert has never seen a shot fired in anger.
DetroiterInAustralia 3 months ago
the Mein Kampf of the 21st century, Get it, The Pentagon purpose is not to protect our sovereignty but to spread globalism with bloodshed, the conquering of those economies that arent swallowed in the Globalist debt trap Libya, Iran is next, those primitive misguided fools adhear to an outdated concept the Usury is bad, so we shall murder them into submission, Thank Obama and Hitlery
DetroiterInAustralia 3 months ago
White man's Arrogance Par Excellence
interesting to see how it has failed and China will take it over.
bonnie8731 7 months ago
so , all what this guy is speaking about is democracy . And as we know democracy is atheism brought to it's peak. democracy is when you are allowed to get married with a dog, and that's why some people want democracy so much. very democratic american democracy, when america does what it wants to do , and other nations are due to listen to what america has to say about their actions and if they are not assumed to be currect then do what america wants
abrekize 7 months ago
@abrekize
Democracy is too much sophisticated for your atrophiated brain
MirceaBv 7 months ago
its great to see the Evil Psychopaths tell it as it is
small minds can do great harm
adarti999 8 months ago
LOL! He said, If we can sneak Obama in this year (2008) "life will get much better"... He messed-up big time on that prediction. Obama took all the bad stuff of Bush and turbo charged it!
Just my personal observation, don't take me too seriously ... Think for yourselves, fair enough? :)
Ganderco 8 months ago
@Ganderco Examples? I would say the Obama administration's handling for foreign affairs is much better than the Bush Administration's. His handling of Libya so far seems to have been exactly how this guy seems to advocate. The continuation of the PATRIOT Act, the continuation of Guantanamo, and stuff like that is not what this guy suggests though.
ektrules 8 months ago
Wow i see we have self-proclaim "experts" in here, just makes me laugh. The idiots are trying to sound smart.
Jmerino7 9 months ago
You guys are all insane. Stop calling him 'retarded' or that a dictator ship is going to erupt, that won't happen for decades, nor hundreds of years.
Lockonmodernjesus 1 year ago
I didn't think it was possible for me to come across a video that goes up to 1 hour. Whoa.
Legojack261 1 year ago
Funny thing, the Word of God warns of fourth Babylon, One world order, and here it is being wished for, and developed, quickly, the pace is set.
JAHFREE777 1 year ago
this guy is a complete retard
420greenmarine 2 years ago
Rich people want it all.
offsprings1337 2 years ago
In the words of the presenter he is very confident in view of the world and the trends he sees. As he notes no one will listen to a wishy washy grand strategist.
Whether you think globilization is positive or not, think on this. The UK,France,Germany, Russia are all prosperous and peaceful. China, Japan, South Korea, and India are all growing in economic power and yet no war between these powers.
Globilization has gone from a supply push to a demand pull by emerging economic countries.
drooddogg 2 years ago
This is the first time Ive seen it admiited that the British Empire used intelligence methods and financial corruption to "co-opt" the United States and "punch above its weight.". What was WW II and the cold war all about anyway, did it have anything to do with the health and safety of the American people, did Iraq GBU have anything either to do wiht UD oil interests, or r we the cannon fodder of BP-Shell?
Ecothearcy 3 years ago
* "Regions, countries, and groups feeling left behind will face deepening economic stagnation, political instability, and cultural alienation. They will foster political, ethnic, ideological, and religious extremism, along with the violence that often accompanies it".
Horhey0420 3 years ago
"Most countries that embrace global free trade are single party state systems".....the financial ideology of dictatorship......"the Balkan intervention was highly successful , how long will it be till we see Iraqi peacekeepers"....all mass violence of the system pccurs in the states outside the core.....intervention by the core against ehe no core.
Ecothearcy 3 years ago
National Intelligence Council
GLOBAL TRENDS 2015:
"In contrast to the Industrial Revolution, the process of globalization is more compressed. Its evolution will be rocky, marked by chronic financial volatility and a widening economic divide".
Horhey0420 3 years ago
interesting
11pavocavalry 3 years ago
interesting
11pavocavalry 3 years ago
He's just saying the US enslaves people in the Third World. The policy has been to keep the Third World in poverty for the benefit of US multinational corporations.
Any threat to US corporate and power interests in the Third World is crushed by terror, tyranny, and economic strangulation.
We're supposed to believe countries like Nicaragua are a threat to the super power becouse they're economy isnt being exploited by US multinational corporations.
Horhey0420 3 years ago
Boy did you miss the point.
masterhalco 3 years ago
That's what he's promoting. He's not going to come out and say..
"The major threat to US interests is the trend in Latin America toward nationalistic regimes that respond to popular demand for immediate improvement in the low living standards of the masses and for production geared to domestic needs".
Horhey0420 3 years ago
"The US is committed to encouraging a climate conducive to private investment, and must encuraoge the Latin American countries to base their economies on a system of private enterprise, and, as essential thereto, to create a political and economic climate conducive to private investment of both domestic and foreign capital, including guarantees for the opportunity to earn and in the case of foreign capital to repatriate a reasonable return."
Horhey0420 3 years ago
No, he didn't. Horhey summarised it beautifully. You can refer to a US military report on unconventional warfare that flat out supports the use of terrorism as a useful political tool, just as the PNAC report said that race-specific bioweapons should be legitimized as a political tool.
kolnidre666 2 years ago
AWESOME!
One of the most inspirational YouTubes ever!
SkagitIMS 3 years ago
Don't let Positroniks speed and authority confuse you. Read carefully what he says and question his words. Ask yourself why he makes assertions without any evidence to back them up and why he offers his opinion up as though it were fact.
jench78 3 years ago
He uses plenty of evidence, especially in the question answer section. He can only offer up so much in an hour. This is really the cliff notes of what he says in his books. You could read his books that are full of evidence. Also his blog has data and sources.
You don't like his ideas, so you come up with a straw man argument: "he doesn't offer evidence." You don't have to agree with him, but if you were actually paying attention you'd notice loads of examples, precedents, and data.
masterhalco 3 years ago
"you" refers to positronics.
masterhalco 3 years ago
Don't let the speed and authority of this man's speech confuse you. Listen carefully to what he says and question his words. Ask yourself why he makes assertions without any evidence to back them up and why he offers his opinion up as though it were fact. He speaks of freemarkets as if any actually exist free of government regulation. He is a warmonger and economic hitman and he and his ilk will be the ruin of liberty and human civilization as we know them.
positroniks 3 years ago
He likes government regulation in markets. He talks about rule-sets for trade and markets extensively. I guess you missed the part about the food trade and regulations. You missed the part about the 1400 banking principals. You missed the part about the interoperability of ports trough standards. You missed the part about business helping developing countries come up with a legal system.
Unlike you he realizes that economic connectivity, jobs, opportunity, rules, etc., lead to liberty.
masterhalco 3 years ago
Insightful. I like his politics. He also has a lot of energy.
Wizjkahna 3 years ago 5
This is really good
zaber789 3 years ago 3
Whether you agree or disagree, this guy is one of the most interesting speakers of youtube.
thankyouira 3 years ago 11
It's extremely difficult to disagree with this guy. Frankly, I hate soft leftists like Sean Penn who can't seem to see the connection between free markets and their success. On the other hand, there are "conservatives" (old time isolationalists) who can't see the connection between religious flourishing and freedom of religion, for example. This guy shuts the bastards up quite nicely....hence some youtube comments asking for "evidence."
Gyrode 2 years ago