@abuttner I don't care what mythbusters failed to do, they also failed at the Bedini motor! Scientist John Fiala, a client of mine from 8-years ago, got the beamship to fly in hard vacuum. As did NASA, as did the inventor of this system, over 50-years ago, as did Takaaki Musha, Purdue University, and the US ARMY in 2000. It is proven mathematically the force of ion wind is insufficient by over 3 oeders of magnitude to cause levitaiton of even a 5-gram model, and this model is 28 grams.
@slushomatic Yes there is string holding it down so it does not go out of control. So What??? Do you even know who American Scientist Thomas Townsend Brown is? How about Nikola Tesla? Do you know what the Biefeld-Brown Effect is? We really need to update our textbooks!
@Beamshipcaptain I think its great that there are people out there taking this seriously, I recently started reading about Subquantum Kinetics and Antigravity propulsion and I am very very happy to be learning about it. I believe it should definitely be part of the textbooks in high school.
The day humans build a real space travel ship (call it a flying saucer then), there will be a new vehicle TAX in the world. Crazy governments would be rubbing their hands together with TAX glee! That is if we have the technology on OUR planet to do the science stuff?!! Ships you read about may have common rocks on their planets that makes anti-gravity childsplay. I doubt if aliens even know we exist on this planet Earth!
Believe me, they know we exist. For millenia. You can see UFOs and saucers painted on caves, adn old religiou-s paintings in Europe. This technology has been in the hands of th German military for 68-years, and America, canada, great Britain since the early 1950s.
I can't believe you even though I do believe in 'them'. We have telescopes and all sorts of technology that scans millions of years of time, yet we cannot see anything waving at us. Nobody really knows if, or where these other beings are situated as there are billions of galaxy systems out there. We don't have a clue where they would be and likewise, I strongly suspect 'they' have the same limitations. Things seen over our skies I believe are just military craft that we should not be seeing.
There are NO limitations to a sufficiently advanced technology. 40-miles above the Earth, you're not even yet in outer space, yet you can see no sign of life. 100-years ago, we barely had domestic electricity, no air-travel (except by balloon), and no lasers or computers. Yet in the lifetime of a man, we on Earth went from the musket to the H-bomb, from skyrockets, to the Lunar Excursion Module. From BIRTH OF A NATION, to 2001: a space Odyssey. Extrapolate. What will the next 60- years bring?
The next 60 years will bring a lot of eye-opening technological advances, yet mankind will not break the habit of destroying its creations or using them to harm others, or threaten to. I just wish I was born in another thousand years time where technology is the solidifaction of the dream.
Yes, in a few centuries time, Earth Humans will definitely be "hurrying through the universe" in faster than light starships,exploring colonising, making new friends and allies. But I think I was born at exactly the right time,1961, the dawn of manned space, so I can help to pioneer and make this happen, thorough all the influences and all my knowledge and study, and published works. Plus, your soul or conscioussness is energy, that is never created or destroyed, so we all live again;no death.
I read on the internet that these things create ozone, which can be harmful. Also, is it possible to run something like this without an expensive power supply?
Ozone is NOT harmful. It freshens the air, just like after a thunderstorm, and cleans the air of pathogens and pollutants. Ozone therapy by filtering blood thru a machine has cured AIDS and Hepatitis patients. Many commercial-aircleaners operate similarly. AH Bahnson Labs, where work that led to patents was done in the late 1950s, made similar air-conditioners for submarines and nuclear-reactors. I am running this model on a $99, 124-gram piezoelectric power-supply,12-Volt input power.
And Chlorine to pool-water. Chlorine is a deadly caustic-gas. Ozone traps pollutants, which ARE deadly. Ozone filtering of blood has CURED AIDS and hepatitis patients.
You can get a great battery powered piezoelectric power-supply for less than $100, from Applied Electrogravitics.You can fly a 5-foot diameter VTOL model with it.
Google: Applied Electrogravitics. This is a science-fair winning design (Detroit Metro Science-fair, 2003, grand prize in Physics), that has not enough ion-wind to deflect a feather, yet the thrust is tremendous, and model is silent. NO NOISE. No pollution. No fuel. A propulsion system befitting an advanced culture in space, such as our own.
On Friday, NASA published the first ever photos of planets orbiting other stars. We have entered the interstellar age. With electrogravitics methodologies, Earth-Humans will visit some of these planets orbiting other stars this century.
Is this running on DC power? Presumably your primary power supply is 110V AC, transformed up to many kiloVolts (20-30kV?) So is it then rectified to DC?
The lifter seems to be generating thrust at right angles to its horizontal plane. Am I right?
I'm guessing that a lot of ozone is generated by these devices; I hope anyone who experiments with them is careful to do so in a very well ventilated space - ozone is distinctly toxic.
Yes of COURSE it is DC, variacs turned up all the way on Voltage and Current, 40,000 Volts DC, current limited to 1.5 MilliAmperes. Multiply Current x milliAmps, and you get 60-Watts, or a dim-lightbulb's worth of electrical energy per hour.
Well, of COURSE it's DC, and an anti-gravity field is generated between the anode and the cathode so the cathode falls up to the anode, right? So if you wanted reverse thrust, just switch the polarity, right? Cute.
Click on Information then Documents. There is a great wealth of the Professor's writings there. He's not only a brilliant physicist, he is also an expert in the medical field and a deep philosopher.
We are manned flight divisin, Swallowcommand. My tasks are to finish building the all polystyrene IGV, and support Professor Searl in all lectures and presentations.
We have been studying the SEG and IGV since summer, 1986. I moved the magnet mock-up SEG with my own hands in 2006, at COFE II in Washington DC. Yes, professor Searl is the smartest and most skilled and insightful inventor since Nikola Tesla. I have Professor Searl's lectures form Tesla Symposium in Colorado Springs, CO since 1994.
Thank the inventor of this: US Pat 2,949,550 ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS, from american Genius physicist Thomas Townsend Brown, who worked on the PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT (PROJECT RAINBOW) by his own admission, because of his expertise with such force-field work. God Bless TT Brown. And Professor John Searl,who is my Boss,and Teammate at Swallowcommand.The Future of Flight.We are winning,to put mankind on the path of clean-cheap energy and star-travel,in our lifetime.The Searl IGV is my project!
The larger you build them the more efficient they are. I am constructing a 3-meter IGV as per Professor John Searl's specifications. Feel free to take this work to the next level. Be careful.
Wow - is this a new invention? I never heard of anything like this before. Gee - star travel in my lifetime? For real? This is gonna go faster than light, like warp speed?
Beamship, I was at a local USA university here in USA a few years ago, LSU, and a professor showed me a government funded research device being developed for national defense. It was some type of space satelite scanning device which could identify the molecular structure of anything in it's eye. It could find weapons, and quite frankly it could find and ID anything in it's database.
I'm sure that's just the tip of the iceberg,sirmikey, quite frankly. Most folks would be shocked to learn that ANYTHING you see in science-fiction has been done, and is being done. There is NO limit to the mind...
So - - will these things go faster-than-light or through wormholes or how will they achieve Star-Travel by Earth-Humans within my lifetime? Can't wait ! :-)
Erm - most scientists are not physicists - I guess you're a physicist, Mr Beamship? A PhD, professor or what?
Just a published researcher, with degrees in computer programming and music. Since they have no inertia, FTL is a real possibility. Just raise the amplitude of the electrogravitic-wave. Read- "Electric Spacecraft Propulsion by Specially-Conditioned EM Fields", H.David Froning and T.Barrett,ELECTRIC SPACECRAFT JOURNAL,issue 24,Oct.Nov.Dec.1996.
No inertia? That's remarkable. How does something with mass have no inertia? They DO have mass, right? Of course, we could reject all physics that associates mass and inertia, but then, would we be scientists, or physicists, computer programmers or ukele teachers?
Inertial-mass is canceled, but gravitational-mass stays the same. Every atom of ship and payload respond in uniform fashion to the applied field. Device is like a surfboard on an electrogravitic-wave. TT Brown had proved by 1938 with model-boats with charged rim-segments that animals and plant passengers feel no G-forces or stress, no hatter how sharp a turn, or instant starts and stops at any speed. John Searl's IGV model craft similarly lack inertia when energised.
So you could be going the speed of light in one direction, and in one second turn around, stop and go the speed of light in the opposite direction and feel little to no G-Forces on our body, That is extremely incredible!
That is typical UFO and flying-saucer behavior, as noticed by witnesses, and caught on film and videotape since the 1940s. Inertial-shielding. The ONLY way to fly. Or fly in outer space.
Yeah, not sure if i ma 100% on this, Beam correct me if i am wrong, but these things set up there on gravitational force around them, this gives in to inertia inside, just as the planet is going through space and we don't feel it so it would be inside one of these units, also even more interesting is because it affects gravity it also affects time, Beam have you put a watch in one yet to check for this?
If you were inside a TT Brown saucer, as I built, starting nearly 20-years ago, you would feel no G-forces, no matter the maneuver, or velocity. You would have no sense of movement from within, and yes, your watch would run slower, depending on powerlevel (field-strenght). Onboard the Searl Inverse G Vehicle t flight Voltage, there is a constant 1/2 G, and no sense of motion from within, no G-forces or inertia either. But watches run faster inside the IGV, because it is only at 1/2 G.
Sweet thats what I thought Beam, one day extreme ionisation should take us into interdimensional travel as well, even go through solid objects. Just getting past the dangers will be the hurtles.
Matter is 99.9% empty-space. But obviously, space is not empty. 80% of all space is Dark Energy (ether, or Quantum Foam). Which contains more potential energy than our wildest dreams. Nature routinely taps this inexhaustible Dirac Sea of energy.
Having no inertia, as in other force-field propulsion methodologies (like Toroidal coils), mass-dilation is non-existent. No mass build-up. THe speed of light should be no barrier to a craft propelled by force-field effect methodologies. ROckets may have gotten us to the moon in 3-days, but we will never go far in space as a species if we depend on rocketry. For millions of years, other advance cultures have been showing us a better way to move from point A to B. And, its CLEAN.
There are 3-strings tethring it down to keep it at a certain height and from going out of control in a dangerous manner, one positive.003" stainless steel wire going to the top anode(+), and a .003" stainless steel wire on left which is negative or chassis ground (-), and this is attatched to the foil-cathode. The result is acceleration, in any medium: air, sea, space. The Future is NOW. Try the experiment at home, with care, remember this is high-Voltage at low-Amperage.
Try the experiment yourself. Read ETHER TECHNOLOGY: A RATIONAL APPROACH TO GRAVITY-CONTROL, b Rho Sigma. This is the famous Biefeld Brown Effect, discovered in 1927 by Thomas Townsend Brown.
Try this experiment yourself. You will see you get silent-flight,inertialess flight, a lot of force for not a lot of power-input, and little no no wind-thrust in conventional-sense. BE CAREFUL, these de-gravitate with great force!
This is the Biefeld-Brown Effect, USpat.#2,949,550 ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS(1960), and uses less than 60-Watts to degravitate with far more force and far-less reqired input electrical-energy than ion-powered craft. These craft are inertia-free,and zip around at amazing-speed, despite the size of 2-meters and weight of 48-grams. Slow and grace-ful-movements, or jerky, and very quick. What does that remind you of? The wonder of Science, thanks to TT Brown.
Whoops, I accidently hit delete instead of reply! Yes, thrust is much higher when pulsed as TT Brown did, and our micro-piezo power-supply is pulsed. Yes, excellent ideas, all. Control is electrodynamic. Feel free to do some building and flying yourself. BE CAREFUL. They levitate with great force, despite the great size and weight.
I would say that looking at the design it looks more like an ion-pump that gives air molecules an electrostatic charge at the top and the ionized air is then attracted to the bottom doe to the charge differences providing some trust.
Basically it looks like a light weight ion engine rather than an anti-gravity device.
When adjusted as an ion-engine, fails to get off the ground. When gap-adjusted for the least ion-wind, thrust goes up dramatically, and ion-wind is so diffuse, it wont delect a feather, but the thrust goes thru the roof, and power-consumption is less than any such device. The 4-foot square DeSeversky's ionocraft uses 30KV @ 3mA (90-Watts), and Beamship Var. 6-foot diameter, and stays airborne on less than 55-Watts. jlnlabs dot org has NASA-Vacuum-footage, and TT Brown Vacuum footage from 1957.
Looking at their website they seem to attribute the effect to the Biefeld-Brown effect creates trust using electrical rather than chemical energy which is basically how ion pumps and ion engines work, it's all fairly interesting but it's as close to flight trough gravity nullification as a helicopter.
Please read: POSSIBILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, by Takaaki Musha, and ZUR EINHEITLICHTEN FELD THERIE, by A. Einstien (1927).Download the NASA vacuum-chamber footage on jlnlabs dot com. This is a true WARP DRIVE, NOT an impulse drive.
POSSIBILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha (Yokohama, Japan) AIAA 2007, ZUR EINHEITLICHTEN FELD THERIE, the Unified Field Theory for Gravitation and electricity (1927) A. Einstein, ON THE EQUIVALENCE OF ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Michael Faraday.
Takaaki Musha's research found that ion engines could provides some degree of trust, Einstein postulated that there could be a link between electromagnetism and gravity but was never able to link the two and Faraday lived in the 1800s and worked on electricity long before Einstein postulated that the two can be connected.
As for your articles, at least two of them doesn't seem to exist and the only results I found with about 5 separate search engines points to the post above.
Read- OUTSIDE THE BOX- SPACE AND TERRESTRIAL TRANSPORTATION AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, Theodore C. Loder (AIAA-2002-1131, 40th AIAA, Jan. 2002), T. Musha, "Theoretical Explanation of the Biefeld Brown Effect", ELECTRIC SPACECRAFT JOURNAL, 31,29.
Sometimes I have to question weather you have actuaily read those papers yourself, why don't you give an explanation that doesn't involve trust or electrostatic interaction with a fixed object by yourself?
EHD thrusters like the one you built don't seem to have very good power/weight ratio nor energy efficiency when compared to a conventional rotor powered by a combustion engine and so would be impractical to implement, attach a scale to it and see how much lifting power it actuaily has.
The Power-to-Weight ratio in Beamship Variation III (6-foot diameter) and Beamship Varition V is approximately .87 Watts/gram of craft and payload, accounting for losses from thin wiring and sharp-edges of electrogravitics platform.
So how high have you been able to get it off the ground?
If it was nullifying gravity rather than lifting itself with thrust weight would be fairly irrelevant in your calculation as it is determined by the force of which gravity acting on it which would be in this case zero and the device would be able in theory reach an infinite height.
Because it would take too long and too much space here in thes small paragraphs they make you write in YouTube, and my keyboard cannot type many mathematical-symbols, so I have to be genral and brief in my elucidations. To make better platforms, you have to really understand what is going on with your vectors and tensors.
You could write it using alternative symbols as F=Id/K and then explain it as F being the amount of trust generated by the lifter, I as the current trough the current that flows in the system, d is the air gap in the lifter which is measured in meters and K as the ion mobility coefficient of air in m2/Volt sec.
I can give you a formula for determining how much trust is provided in the space given by youtube.
It simply obeys the god old F = ma (in a nutshell).
where F = force (in Newtons), m = mass (in grams), and of course, a = acceleration ( a ratio per-second of unit T, time, but that is a separate little equation.
I will try to post the additional equations, but the force obeys the inverse-square law, so it is an aspect of electromagnetism, gnerated by electromagnetism, so what Einstein was saying was the equations show that gravity is a by-product of the neutral center-force of electromagnetism (as in Bloch-Wall) and is as easily-generated by our primitive-technology as any other force-field in Nature.
keep trying different search-engines; this is the internet. You are connected to every library on Earth... Einstein certainly found the link between the two, if you would just read (but its in high-German, the math is the universal-language in there) ZUR EINHEITLICTEN FELD THERIE, or the Unified Field Theory for Gravitation and Electricity, von A. Einstein (1925-27, Prussian Science-Journals).
The one from Einstein wasn't the one I was unable to find.
I had a look at that as well as subsequent works based on his research and so far they have managed to tie electromagnetism, weak and strong nuclear force together using quantum physics but even Einstein by his own admission in that paper has not been able to tie gravity in with the other 3 fundamental forces of nature, and that is why I question if you actuaily read the papers you tell others to read.
Are you sure that he wasn't unifying electricity and magnetism?
And besides what does that have to do with how your craft works?
From what I understand according to the Biefeld--Brown effect the fairly sharp electrode on the top ionizes the air around it while the fairly blunt bottom electrode attracts the ionised air from the top downward which creates downward thrust.
Electricity and magnetism are already unified as ElectroMagnetism. Einstein just unified electricity and gravitation, henc the name ZUR EINHEITLICHTEN FELD THEORY, or the Unified Field Theory for Gravitation and Electricity, released in 1929 to the NY TIMES.
Which is why we have satelites. YouTube search topic Major De Seversky's Ion-Propelled Aircraft, Google search topic Jean-Loius Naudin, Jean-Loius Naudin Lifter, Jean-Loius Naudin le projet Lifter
Please read ETHER TECHNOLOGY, by Rho Sigma, and ANTIGRAVITY: THE DREAM MADE REALITY, by John Thomas, and ELECTROGRAVITICS II, By Dr. Thomas Valone. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER, THAT NOONE CAN EVER TAKE AWAY FROM YOU. Read and BE EMPOWERED!!! Fight against ignorance in society!
Beamship. Liters are tiny, Watt-wasting, low-thrust TOYS. You need at leas three-legs to make a stool, and three-points to determine a plane. The plane is the Earth Surface. You want to be parallel to the Earth's surface to maintain a hover, and like a helicopter, you tilt down in direction you want to go! TT Brown dot com. The befeld Brown-Effec, USP#2,949,550.
Hey nice lifter. Is lifter the official name? I'd like to know more about how they work. Is there any particular reason why they are always triangular? Is it just because its the most stable shape or would a square work? And what exactly is going on that makes it lift? If you have any links please point me in the right direction. Thanks.
appliedelectrogravitics dot com Anything in aerospace can be scaled up. This is a simple, but very effective propulsion methodology, as TT Brown and I and others proved. We are getting power/weight ration of .87-Watts/Gram. The devices are more powerful and efficient the larger we build them Calculate your own weight, weight of powerplant, and device, using the fuigure as a base for calibration, and how much electrical-energy you have to supply to the plates. Peace.
Read Dr. Patrick Bailey's (INE) paper on the many metodologies of achieving ANTIGRAVIY. It's featured on the DVDs that come FREE with all applied electrogravitivs Beamship kits. Also, a whole educational-section on DVD on "100-Years of Antigravity". A primoer on the many myriad methods of DYNAMIC COUNTERBARY, or GRAVITY-CONTROL. Rocket-Scientis Hermann Oberth stated in 50's that UFOs were REAL, EXTRATERRESTRIAL, and flew by GRAVITY-CONTROL. Its all on the DVDs.
Thanks for your kind words. I would almost would not have believed something this big and heavy could degravitate with such astounding force, without any detectable ion-thrust; it is simply AMAZING. "There is more in Heaven and Earth Horatio, than is dreamt of in your philosophy".-Shakespeare
You are partially right. Theis is the joining of two smaller videos. One is the Take-Off, One is the landing. That is the only edit, the joining of two segments. But the device does indeed degravitate with astounding force, on less than 60-Watts DC (40kV @ 1.5mA). Try it yourself, I'm here to help!
Beamship (tm) series Variation III, in a full-power lift off to the ceiling, and then a controlled descent by slowly lowering Variac on commercial pwer supply from GAMMA HIGH-VOLTAGE RESEARCH. 40kV, with current-limiting to 1.5 mA. Full metering and adjustablity of Voltage, and current, for accurate results. That, a digital scale, and dogged-determination makes such results possible! From Applied Electrogravitics, USA!
No moving parts are needed in Biefeld-Brown Effect craft. Instead, we electrically isolate the 3-cathodes, and simply reduce the neg-potentials to the side-plates to get pitch and roll, and like a helicopter, the craft flies off RAPIDLY in direction of tilt-angle. Control is all electrodynamic in these and similar craft, no airflow needed.
Mythbusters busted this design by putting it in a vacuum: turns out the wire generates ion down-draft - nothing more than a high-tech hovercraft.
abuttner 1 year ago
@abuttner I don't care what mythbusters failed to do, they also failed at the Bedini motor! Scientist John Fiala, a client of mine from 8-years ago, got the beamship to fly in hard vacuum. As did NASA, as did the inventor of this system, over 50-years ago, as did Takaaki Musha, Purdue University, and the US ARMY in 2000. It is proven mathematically the force of ion wind is insufficient by over 3 oeders of magnitude to cause levitaiton of even a 5-gram model, and this model is 28 grams.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
@Beamshipcaptain Actually, this model is some 45-grams in weight.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
srry bro I can see your fishing line in the vid
slushomatic 1 year ago
@slushomatic Yes there is string holding it down so it does not go out of control. So What??? Do you even know who American Scientist Thomas Townsend Brown is? How about Nikola Tesla? Do you know what the Biefeld-Brown Effect is? We really need to update our textbooks!
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
@Beamshipcaptain I think its great that there are people out there taking this seriously, I recently started reading about Subquantum Kinetics and Antigravity propulsion and I am very very happy to be learning about it. I believe it should definitely be part of the textbooks in high school.
Idkfawin32 1 year ago
@Idkfawin32 Exatly right, and thanks very much, sir.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
how it flyes? RC
pampers9772 1 year ago
High-Voltage, Low-Amperage DC, feed and return to flying capacitor with .003" stainless Steel wire.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
The day humans build a real space travel ship (call it a flying saucer then), there will be a new vehicle TAX in the world. Crazy governments would be rubbing their hands together with TAX glee! That is if we have the technology on OUR planet to do the science stuff?!! Ships you read about may have common rocks on their planets that makes anti-gravity childsplay. I doubt if aliens even know we exist on this planet Earth!
digitalbroadcaster 2 years ago
Believe me, they know we exist. For millenia. You can see UFOs and saucers painted on caves, adn old religiou-s paintings in Europe. This technology has been in the hands of th German military for 68-years, and America, canada, great Britain since the early 1950s.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
I can't believe you even though I do believe in 'them'. We have telescopes and all sorts of technology that scans millions of years of time, yet we cannot see anything waving at us. Nobody really knows if, or where these other beings are situated as there are billions of galaxy systems out there. We don't have a clue where they would be and likewise, I strongly suspect 'they' have the same limitations. Things seen over our skies I believe are just military craft that we should not be seeing.
digitalbroadcaster 2 years ago
There are NO limitations to a sufficiently advanced technology. 40-miles above the Earth, you're not even yet in outer space, yet you can see no sign of life. 100-years ago, we barely had domestic electricity, no air-travel (except by balloon), and no lasers or computers. Yet in the lifetime of a man, we on Earth went from the musket to the H-bomb, from skyrockets, to the Lunar Excursion Module. From BIRTH OF A NATION, to 2001: a space Odyssey. Extrapolate. What will the next 60- years bring?
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
The next 60 years will bring a lot of eye-opening technological advances, yet mankind will not break the habit of destroying its creations or using them to harm others, or threaten to. I just wish I was born in another thousand years time where technology is the solidifaction of the dream.
digitalbroadcaster 2 years ago
Yes, in a few centuries time, Earth Humans will definitely be "hurrying through the universe" in faster than light starships,exploring colonising, making new friends and allies. But I think I was born at exactly the right time,1961, the dawn of manned space, so I can help to pioneer and make this happen, thorough all the influences and all my knowledge and study, and published works. Plus, your soul or conscioussness is energy, that is never created or destroyed, so we all live again;no death.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
@digitalbroadcaster You SHALL be born again, in a thousand years time, or less. There is no death.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
Keep researching this technology. All claims are verifiable, if you have the willingness to dig, and work hard, as some folks have done.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
I read on the internet that these things create ozone, which can be harmful. Also, is it possible to run something like this without an expensive power supply?
jlac47 3 years ago
Ozone is NOT harmful. It freshens the air, just like after a thunderstorm, and cleans the air of pathogens and pollutants. Ozone therapy by filtering blood thru a machine has cured AIDS and Hepatitis patients. Many commercial-aircleaners operate similarly. AH Bahnson Labs, where work that led to patents was done in the late 1950s, made similar air-conditioners for submarines and nuclear-reactors. I am running this model on a $99, 124-gram piezoelectric power-supply,12-Volt input power.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
they also add ozone to bottled water.
timsperts 2 years ago
And Chlorine to pool-water. Chlorine is a deadly caustic-gas. Ozone traps pollutants, which ARE deadly. Ozone filtering of blood has CURED AIDS and hepatitis patients.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
You can get a great battery powered piezoelectric power-supply for less than $100, from Applied Electrogravitics.You can fly a 5-foot diameter VTOL model with it.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Are there any plans for this on the net?
Davaris666 3 years ago
Google: Applied Electrogravitics. This is a science-fair winning design (Detroit Metro Science-fair, 2003, grand prize in Physics), that has not enough ion-wind to deflect a feather, yet the thrust is tremendous, and model is silent. NO NOISE. No pollution. No fuel. A propulsion system befitting an advanced culture in space, such as our own.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
On Friday, NASA published the first ever photos of planets orbiting other stars. We have entered the interstellar age. With electrogravitics methodologies, Earth-Humans will visit some of these planets orbiting other stars this century.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
A couple of questions:
Is this running on DC power? Presumably your primary power supply is 110V AC, transformed up to many kiloVolts (20-30kV?) So is it then rectified to DC?
The lifter seems to be generating thrust at right angles to its horizontal plane. Am I right?
I'm guessing that a lot of ozone is generated by these devices; I hope anyone who experiments with them is careful to do so in a very well ventilated space - ozone is distinctly toxic.
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
Yes of COURSE it is DC, variacs turned up all the way on Voltage and Current, 40,000 Volts DC, current limited to 1.5 MilliAmperes. Multiply Current x milliAmps, and you get 60-Watts, or a dim-lightbulb's worth of electrical energy per hour.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Well, of COURSE it's DC, and an anti-gravity field is generated between the anode and the cathode so the cathode falls up to the anode, right? So if you wanted reverse thrust, just switch the polarity, right? Cute.
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago 2
Do take a look at the SwallowCommannddotcom site.
Click on Information then Documents. There is a great wealth of the Professor's writings there. He's not only a brilliant physicist, he is also an expert in the medical field and a deep philosopher.
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
We are manned flight divisin, Swallowcommand. My tasks are to finish building the all polystyrene IGV, and support Professor Searl in all lectures and presentations.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
All polystryrene - wow.
What's the thrust per kW?
Looks like it tends to be all or nothing on power. Is the thrust controllable?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
YES.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
We have been studying the SEG and IGV since summer, 1986. I moved the magnet mock-up SEG with my own hands in 2006, at COFE II in Washington DC. Yes, professor Searl is the smartest and most skilled and insightful inventor since Nikola Tesla. I have Professor Searl's lectures form Tesla Symposium in Colorado Springs, CO since 1994.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
What a wonderful device. This is so exciting.
I see this is from 11 months ago. I guess you've bult one that will carry a person by now? Can you go to the shops in it?
LifesVoyager 3 years ago
Thank the inventor of this: US Pat 2,949,550 ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS, from american Genius physicist Thomas Townsend Brown, who worked on the PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT (PROJECT RAINBOW) by his own admission, because of his expertise with such force-field work. God Bless TT Brown. And Professor John Searl,who is my Boss,and Teammate at Swallowcommand.The Future of Flight.We are winning,to put mankind on the path of clean-cheap energy and star-travel,in our lifetime.The Searl IGV is my project!
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
And a sensible sized version that does something useful?
LifesVoyager 3 years ago
The larger you build them the more efficient they are. I am constructing a 3-meter IGV as per Professor John Searl's specifications. Feel free to take this work to the next level. Be careful.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Wow - is this a new invention? I never heard of anything like this before. Gee - star travel in my lifetime? For real? This is gonna go faster than light, like warp speed?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
American Physicist *Thomas Townsend Brown* discoverd the ELECTROGRAVITY effect in 1927.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Yes sir, Star-Travel by Earth-Humans within our lifetime.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
I just hope we find extra-terretrial life. Theirs some here on our planet but many scientists for some reason don't want to believe that.
mechaghostman2 3 years ago
That is because most scientists are not physicists.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Beamship, I was at a local USA university here in USA a few years ago, LSU, and a professor showed me a government funded research device being developed for national defense. It was some type of space satelite scanning device which could identify the molecular structure of anything in it's eye. It could find weapons, and quite frankly it could find and ID anything in it's database.
sirmikeydotcom 3 years ago 2
I'm sure that's just the tip of the iceberg,sirmikey, quite frankly. Most folks would be shocked to learn that ANYTHING you see in science-fiction has been done, and is being done. There is NO limit to the mind...
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
So - - will these things go faster-than-light or through wormholes or how will they achieve Star-Travel by Earth-Humans within my lifetime? Can't wait ! :-)
Erm - most scientists are not physicists - I guess you're a physicist, Mr Beamship? A PhD, professor or what?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
Just a published researcher, with degrees in computer programming and music. Since they have no inertia, FTL is a real possibility. Just raise the amplitude of the electrogravitic-wave. Read- "Electric Spacecraft Propulsion by Specially-Conditioned EM Fields", H.David Froning and T.Barrett,ELECTRIC SPACECRAFT JOURNAL,issue 24,Oct.Nov.Dec.1996.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
No inertia? That's remarkable. How does something with mass have no inertia? They DO have mass, right? Of course, we could reject all physics that associates mass and inertia, but then, would we be scientists, or physicists, computer programmers or ukele teachers?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
Inertial-mass is canceled, but gravitational-mass stays the same. Every atom of ship and payload respond in uniform fashion to the applied field. Device is like a surfboard on an electrogravitic-wave. TT Brown had proved by 1938 with model-boats with charged rim-segments that animals and plant passengers feel no G-forces or stress, no hatter how sharp a turn, or instant starts and stops at any speed. John Searl's IGV model craft similarly lack inertia when energised.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
So you could be going the speed of light in one direction, and in one second turn around, stop and go the speed of light in the opposite direction and feel little to no G-Forces on our body, That is extremely incredible!
mechaghostman2 2 years ago 4
That is typical UFO and flying-saucer behavior, as noticed by witnesses, and caught on film and videotape since the 1940s. Inertial-shielding. The ONLY way to fly. Or fly in outer space.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Yeah, not sure if i ma 100% on this, Beam correct me if i am wrong, but these things set up there on gravitational force around them, this gives in to inertia inside, just as the planet is going through space and we don't feel it so it would be inside one of these units, also even more interesting is because it affects gravity it also affects time, Beam have you put a watch in one yet to check for this?
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago 2
If you were inside a TT Brown saucer, as I built, starting nearly 20-years ago, you would feel no G-forces, no matter the maneuver, or velocity. You would have no sense of movement from within, and yes, your watch would run slower, depending on powerlevel (field-strenght). Onboard the Searl Inverse G Vehicle t flight Voltage, there is a constant 1/2 G, and no sense of motion from within, no G-forces or inertia either. But watches run faster inside the IGV, because it is only at 1/2 G.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Sweet thats what I thought Beam, one day extreme ionisation should take us into interdimensional travel as well, even go through solid objects. Just getting past the dangers will be the hurtles.
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
Matter is 99.9% empty-space. But obviously, space is not empty. 80% of all space is Dark Energy (ether, or Quantum Foam). Which contains more potential energy than our wildest dreams. Nature routinely taps this inexhaustible Dirac Sea of energy.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Cool, well you take care Beam, keep up the great work.
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
Thanks, you do the same. Star Travel in Your Lifetime (STYL). For EVERYONE, the common man in the street, not just the military-elite.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Having no inertia, as in other force-field propulsion methodologies (like Toroidal coils), mass-dilation is non-existent. No mass build-up. THe speed of light should be no barrier to a craft propelled by force-field effect methodologies. ROckets may have gotten us to the moon in 3-days, but we will never go far in space as a species if we depend on rocketry. For millions of years, other advance cultures have been showing us a better way to move from point A to B. And, its CLEAN.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Try the experiment, and by doing so, come away forever changed.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
i see a string on the right! but you almost got me!
scott1423678 3 years ago
There are 3-strings tethring it down to keep it at a certain height and from going out of control in a dangerous manner, one positive.003" stainless steel wire going to the top anode(+), and a .003" stainless steel wire on left which is negative or chassis ground (-), and this is attatched to the foil-cathode. The result is acceleration, in any medium: air, sea, space. The Future is NOW. Try the experiment at home, with care, remember this is high-Voltage at low-Amperage.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
tethering it up ...
scott1423678 3 years ago
Try the experiment yourself. Read ETHER TECHNOLOGY: A RATIONAL APPROACH TO GRAVITY-CONTROL, b Rho Sigma. This is the famous Biefeld Brown Effect, discovered in 1927 by Thomas Townsend Brown.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Try the experiment at home. Be CAREFUL. Consult a science-teacher or lab tech.
F = Vm1m2/r^2
will calculate your force in Newtons, or Dynes. Welcome to the new age of Warp Drive.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
What is V, m1, m2, and r? Have you done a unit analysis on this as it does not yield newtons.
goobergel 3 years ago
V is Voltage. m1 and m2 are the anode and the cathode.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Try this experiment yourself. You will see you get silent-flight,inertialess flight, a lot of force for not a lot of power-input, and little no no wind-thrust in conventional-sense. BE CAREFUL, these de-gravitate with great force!
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
This is absolutely stunning.
How did you possibly make an electromagnetic engine?
It's painfully obvious there are no strings attached.
Qiwolf 3 years ago
This is the Biefeld-Brown Effect, USpat.#2,949,550 ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS(1960), and uses less than 60-Watts to degravitate with far more force and far-less reqired input electrical-energy than ion-powered craft. These craft are inertia-free,and zip around at amazing-speed, despite the size of 2-meters and weight of 48-grams. Slow and grace-ful-movements, or jerky, and very quick. What does that remind you of? The wonder of Science, thanks to TT Brown.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Whoops, I accidently hit delete instead of reply! Yes, thrust is much higher when pulsed as TT Brown did, and our micro-piezo power-supply is pulsed. Yes, excellent ideas, all. Control is electrodynamic. Feel free to do some building and flying yourself. BE CAREFUL. They levitate with great force, despite the great size and weight.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
I won't dispute that it does fly.
I would say that looking at the design it looks more like an ion-pump that gives air molecules an electrostatic charge at the top and the ionized air is then attracted to the bottom doe to the charge differences providing some trust.
Basically it looks like a light weight ion engine rather than an anti-gravity device.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
When adjusted as an ion-engine, fails to get off the ground. When gap-adjusted for the least ion-wind, thrust goes up dramatically, and ion-wind is so diffuse, it wont delect a feather, but the thrust goes thru the roof, and power-consumption is less than any such device. The 4-foot square DeSeversky's ionocraft uses 30KV @ 3mA (90-Watts), and Beamship Var. 6-foot diameter, and stays airborne on less than 55-Watts. jlnlabs dot org has NASA-Vacuum-footage, and TT Brown Vacuum footage from 1957.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Looking at their website they seem to attribute the effect to the Biefeld-Brown effect creates trust using electrical rather than chemical energy which is basically how ion pumps and ion engines work, it's all fairly interesting but it's as close to flight trough gravity nullification as a helicopter.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
Please read: POSSIBILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, by Takaaki Musha, and ZUR EINHEITLICHTEN FELD THERIE, by A. Einstien (1927).Download the NASA vacuum-chamber footage on jlnlabs dot com. This is a true WARP DRIVE, NOT an impulse drive.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
please read:
POSSIBILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha (Yokohama, Japan) AIAA 2007, ZUR EINHEITLICHTEN FELD THERIE, the Unified Field Theory for Gravitation and electricity (1927) A. Einstein, ON THE EQUIVALENCE OF ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Michael Faraday.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Takaaki Musha's research found that ion engines could provides some degree of trust, Einstein postulated that there could be a link between electromagnetism and gravity but was never able to link the two and Faraday lived in the 1800s and worked on electricity long before Einstein postulated that the two can be connected.
As for your articles, at least two of them doesn't seem to exist and the only results I found with about 5 separate search engines points to the post above.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
Read- OUTSIDE THE BOX- SPACE AND TERRESTRIAL TRANSPORTATION AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, Theodore C. Loder (AIAA-2002-1131, 40th AIAA, Jan. 2002), T. Musha, "Theoretical Explanation of the Biefeld Brown Effect", ELECTRIC SPACECRAFT JOURNAL, 31,29.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Sometimes I have to question weather you have actuaily read those papers yourself, why don't you give an explanation that doesn't involve trust or electrostatic interaction with a fixed object by yourself?
PlayerXT 4 years ago
EHD thrusters like the one you built don't seem to have very good power/weight ratio nor energy efficiency when compared to a conventional rotor powered by a combustion engine and so would be impractical to implement, attach a scale to it and see how much lifting power it actuaily has.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
The Power-to-Weight ratio in Beamship Variation III (6-foot diameter) and Beamship Varition V is approximately .87 Watts/gram of craft and payload, accounting for losses from thin wiring and sharp-edges of electrogravitics platform.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
So how high have you been able to get it off the ground?
If it was nullifying gravity rather than lifting itself with thrust weight would be fairly irrelevant in your calculation as it is determined by the force of which gravity acting on it which would be in this case zero and the device would be able in theory reach an infinite height.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
About 12-feet outdoors, a a school in Delaware in December,2002, and that footage is available, I should post it.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Because it would take too long and too much space here in thes small paragraphs they make you write in YouTube, and my keyboard cannot type many mathematical-symbols, so I have to be genral and brief in my elucidations. To make better platforms, you have to really understand what is going on with your vectors and tensors.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
You could write it using alternative symbols as F=Id/K and then explain it as F being the amount of trust generated by the lifter, I as the current trough the current that flows in the system, d is the air gap in the lifter which is measured in meters and K as the ion mobility coefficient of air in m2/Volt sec.
I can give you a formula for determining how much trust is provided in the space given by youtube.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
I'll post the equations in T. Musha's paper and Einstein's.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
I'll write alternatice symbols, like the whole word EPSILON, etc.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
It simply obeys the god old F = ma (in a nutshell).
where F = force (in Newtons), m = mass (in grams), and of course, a = acceleration ( a ratio per-second of unit T, time, but that is a separate little equation.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
In a nutshell, its just the same old F = ma.
I will try to post the additional equations, but the force obeys the inverse-square law, so it is an aspect of electromagnetism, gnerated by electromagnetism, so what Einstein was saying was the equations show that gravity is a by-product of the neutral center-force of electromagnetism (as in Bloch-Wall) and is as easily-generated by our primitive-technology as any other force-field in Nature.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
keep trying different search-engines; this is the internet. You are connected to every library on Earth... Einstein certainly found the link between the two, if you would just read (but its in high-German, the math is the universal-language in there) ZUR EINHEITLICTEN FELD THERIE, or the Unified Field Theory for Gravitation and Electricity, von A. Einstein (1925-27, Prussian Science-Journals).
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
The one from Einstein wasn't the one I was unable to find.
I had a look at that as well as subsequent works based on his research and so far they have managed to tie electromagnetism, weak and strong nuclear force together using quantum physics but even Einstein by his own admission in that paper has not been able to tie gravity in with the other 3 fundamental forces of nature, and that is why I question if you actuaily read the papers you tell others to read.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
Have a look at the final equations at the bottom of his paper. I't apparent the unifying field is the E-field.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Are you sure that he wasn't unifying electricity and magnetism?
And besides what does that have to do with how your craft works?
From what I understand according to the Biefeld--Brown effect the fairly sharp electrode on the top ionizes the air around it while the fairly blunt bottom electrode attracts the ionised air from the top downward which creates downward thrust.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
Electricity and magnetism are already unified as ElectroMagnetism. Einstein just unified electricity and gravitation, henc the name ZUR EINHEITLICHTEN FELD THEORY, or the Unified Field Theory for Gravitation and Electricity, released in 1929 to the NY TIMES.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
NY-TIMES, Jan. 12, 1929
EINSTEIN EXTENDS RELATIVITY THEORY
New Work Seeks to "Unite Laws of Field of Gravitation and Electro-Magnetism."
Sitzung der physikalisch-mathematischen Klasse vom 10. Januar 1929,
Zur Einheitlichen Feldtheorie, Von A. Einstein.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
may I find a paper published on how it works?
rrichar911 4 years ago
BEAMSHIP TECHNOLOGY: A RE-WORKING OF EARLY 20th CENTURY DISCOVERIES, Russell Anderson
Jurnsl of New Energy, Vol.7, No.1, same paper is in NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES MAGAZINE, July/Aug.,2002.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Read: POSSIBILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, by Takaaki Musha, 3-11-7-601 Namiki, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0005 Japan
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Which is why we have satelites. YouTube search topic Major De Seversky's Ion-Propelled Aircraft, Google search topic Jean-Loius Naudin, Jean-Loius Naudin Lifter, Jean-Loius Naudin le projet Lifter
KnightChatX 4 years ago
Please read ETHER TECHNOLOGY, by Rho Sigma, and ANTIGRAVITY: THE DREAM MADE REALITY, by John Thomas, and ELECTROGRAVITICS II, By Dr. Thomas Valone. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER, THAT NOONE CAN EVER TAKE AWAY FROM YOU. Read and BE EMPOWERED!!! Fight against ignorance in society!
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Nice lifter experiment.
KnightChatX 4 years ago
BEAMSHIP. BEAMSHIP!! Lifters are small, inefficient, low-thrust TOYS. Vivie la differance!
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Beamship. Liters are tiny, Watt-wasting, low-thrust TOYS. You need at leas three-legs to make a stool, and three-points to determine a plane. The plane is the Earth Surface. You want to be parallel to the Earth's surface to maintain a hover, and like a helicopter, you tilt down in direction you want to go! TT Brown dot com. The befeld Brown-Effec, USP#2,949,550.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Hey nice lifter. Is lifter the official name? I'd like to know more about how they work. Is there any particular reason why they are always triangular? Is it just because its the most stable shape or would a square work? And what exactly is going on that makes it lift? If you have any links please point me in the right direction. Thanks.
TYSOHN 4 years ago
appliedelectrogravitics dot com Anything in aerospace can be scaled up. This is a simple, but very effective propulsion methodology, as TT Brown and I and others proved. We are getting power/weight ration of .87-Watts/Gram. The devices are more powerful and efficient the larger we build them Calculate your own weight, weight of powerplant, and device, using the fuigure as a base for calibration, and how much electrical-energy you have to supply to the plates. Peace.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
It's crazy how people fuss and fight over these devices. Maybe it's not "anti-gravity," per se. It's still really neat.
The big question is: how do I construct one in and around a vehicle. I want to sit on one and zoom around.
trueedge2097 4 years ago
Read Dr. Patrick Bailey's (INE) paper on the many metodologies of achieving ANTIGRAVIY. It's featured on the DVDs that come FREE with all applied electrogravitivs Beamship kits. Also, a whole educational-section on DVD on "100-Years of Antigravity". A primoer on the many myriad methods of DYNAMIC COUNTERBARY, or GRAVITY-CONTROL. Rocket-Scientis Hermann Oberth stated in 50's that UFOs were REAL, EXTRATERRESTRIAL, and flew by GRAVITY-CONTROL. Its all on the DVDs.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Cool. Cool. Can you send me a YouTube message with the URL. I know they're picky about posting URL's on these responses. I would love to read more.
trueedge2097 4 years ago
great, i love it.
1gregmichael 4 years ago
Thanks for your kind words. I would almost would not have believed something this big and heavy could degravitate with such astounding force, without any detectable ion-thrust; it is simply AMAZING. "There is more in Heaven and Earth Horatio, than is dreamt of in your philosophy".-Shakespeare
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Truth is, this doesn't 'degravitate' at all, in fact, I truly doubt if this is an unedited video.
cadabraa 4 years ago
You are partially right. Theis is the joining of two smaller videos. One is the Take-Off, One is the landing. That is the only edit, the joining of two segments. But the device does indeed degravitate with astounding force, on less than 60-Watts DC (40kV @ 1.5mA). Try it yourself, I'm here to help!
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Beamship (tm) series Variation III, in a full-power lift off to the ceiling, and then a controlled descent by slowly lowering Variac on commercial pwer supply from GAMMA HIGH-VOLTAGE RESEARCH. 40kV, with current-limiting to 1.5 mA. Full metering and adjustablity of Voltage, and current, for accurate results. That, a digital scale, and dogged-determination makes such results possible! From Applied Electrogravitics, USA!
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Can you install a small fan to propel it at one direction?
HAL11000 4 years ago
No moving parts are needed in Biefeld-Brown Effect craft. Instead, we electrically isolate the 3-cathodes, and simply reduce the neg-potentials to the side-plates to get pitch and roll, and like a helicopter, the craft flies off RAPIDLY in direction of tilt-angle. Control is all electrodynamic in these and similar craft, no airflow needed.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Awsome, let me know when it is implemented!
HAL11000 4 years ago
Stay tuned to the Beamship Channel; thee's a lot of excitement coming your way, and in full-colour!
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
YAY! FOR FULL COLOUR!
HAL11000 4 years ago
I am glad I could make your day! We aim to please, here at Applied Electrogravitics, since 1999.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago