Anyone who can watch this and other similar videos without concluding the Nazi's were the among the best propagandists in history, is incapable of recognizing overwhelming evidence. .
hitler made a mistake in atacking london and not continuing in bombng aeroprts.and he hoped for a peace whith england strategic peace,in the vest.
he was afraid for uss and urss and england join forces.not their power,their more resources,i am a great strateg i admire rommel,and the german wermarcht blitzkrieg.
@micutzusef Goering tried everything in the Battle of the Britain and failed, And Hitler turned to bombing British Cities out of revenge and to smash there morale into surrender that also failed, They tried to starve Britain and that also failed! Also Rommel was the desert fox, And when Monty the British Hound became Leader of the 8th Army they hunted Rommel down like the common fox he was. Hitler made the mistake to fight on many fronts and against the worlds superpowers!
@Myieek Rommel was the Desert Fox, That was his nickname and Monty was the British Hound sent to defeat the Fox. Sure Rommel was a great Leader and he done great, However alot of the best Generals,Leaders in history have found themselfs running away from the British, Napolean the Greatest Leader in history humiliated by a outnumbered British Forces to thousands of years ago the Great Ceasar defeated by the Britain Celts,etc
This has all been educational. The comments, I mean, not the propaganda . I dare to think how different the world would be if Hitler had not invaded the Ukraine and let the USSR be for a longer time. Perhaps they may have conquered Europe before we had the opportunity to intervene. They may have massed even larger armies as would the USSR in a cold war much like that which we had. Perhaps we would be asked to choose sides between communist Russia and Nazi Germany. Thoughts?
That's why the Americans stayed out of the war for a long time. Harry S.Truman (who only was vice president at the time) told that he didn't mind the nazis and communists fighing each other and that the USA should support whatever side was losing. Although he admitted he'd rather see the nazis lose.
Hitler knew that 1941 was the last chance he had to invade the USSR,because he was aware they were rapidly increasing their weapons production.By 1942 the USSR would be better prepared
Hitler knew that if he didn't invade the USSR in 1941, Stalin might attack him in 1942. Also at the time the German army was incredibly dependant on the oil from Romanian oil fields and if the USSR took those, then the initiative would be lost for the Germans. Hitler knew very well it was a gamble invading the USSR and that if they didn't get a quick victory then they'd be in deep shit, but he saw no other options, even if his generals were against it.
Uh, Germany DID conquear all Europe save for Great Britain before you interveined. The only countries that weren't conquered were other axis countries and "neutral" fascist countries like Spain and Portugal, as well as those neutral countries which provided Germany with money and steel (Switzerland and Sweden).
80 percent of all German casaulties were on the Eastern Front so you not intervening would lead to a longer war but Nazi Germany would still lose eventually. Resources.
i´m not sure, but i suppose the germans had to smile on the videos . the people should think that they win the war. if the soldiers didn´t smile, they were killed by execution
Western Aliied casualties amounted to less than 1-million troops KIA on all fronts. Stalin & Beria purged the USSR's military of 30,000+ good officers before WWII, and that was one of the main reasons if not the main reason the USSR suffered so many causalties in the frist 2-years of the war.
The reason the western casualties amounted to less is because the MAJORITY of Germans were fighting on the Eastern Front, and it was the MAIN front as far as Hitler and his generals were concerned and were the war would be won or lost. Here's a fact for you which you can verify in any good history book about WW2. 80% of all German casaulties in WW2 were on the eastern front, and since they fought 3 bloody years there before you landed in France it makes perfect sense.
On D-day there were some 60 German divisions in France, compared to over 240 German divisions spread out on the HUGE Eastern Front trying to hold the Red Army back. The Battle of Kursk was the largest tank battle in all WW2 and the theatre which took the most human lives on both sides was the Eastern front.
Also axis countries like Hungary (300,000dead), Romania(350,000dead), Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia and many others fought on the Eastern Front and died there.
Western allies never faced the amount of German panzer forces, heavy guns, men and equipment they had on the Eastern Front.
American live under the illusion they defeated Germany when they invaded France in 1944, when millions of Germans already had died in the war and they were already retreating on the Eastern Front.
And before you mention the lend-lease I can tell you that didn't come in larger numbers until 1943, it was paid with gold and blood. A good deal for the yanks.
@McLarenMercedes, I know much more of hsitory than you, & the USA entered the war in the West in Nov. 1942 in N. Africa so go get bent. I also know much more than you about the East Front. You are deluded in thinking you are the only one that knows anything, & that makes you a silly fool.
MYTH. Total BULL that 20 more Soviets soldiers that died than Germans. Since 80 percent of all German casualties were on the Eastern Front, and around 4 million Germans died there (not counting the hundreds of thousands of Romanians, Italians, Hungarians and other Axis countries fighting there).
Now if what you say is true that 20 times more Soviet soldiers died then that would be 80 million Soviet soldiers dead. The whole war killed 60 million which was both soldiers AND civilians.
How are you counting anyway? If you say the Allies lost 15 million and the Axis only 6,5 million (which is total bull, because that was just the total number of Germans dead, and you fail to mention the 3 million dead Japanese and other axis countries)
Anyway 15 million isn't 20 times more than 6,5 million in ANY case so you're contradicting yourself quite clearly.
Anybody who doesn't know 80 percent of all German casaulties were on the Eastern front and counts a 20 to 1 ratio has
...has no business telling others their numbers are WRONG.
Will you please tell us all where you found those numbers??
Not even 2 Soviet soldiers died for each German. Not even if you count all the Soviet civilians who were shot by the Germans.
I guess you're either a Finn or from one of those Baltic countries, they like to exaggerate a lie a lot. Finns for instance wants us to believe they killed 1 million Soviet troops for 90,000 lost of their own. Haha.
The USSR had thousands of hundreds of tanks, aircraft and small-arms left after the war, if there was no lend-lease, trucks would have been VERY easily produced! The Lend-lease no where near made 80% of USSR's truck forces, maximum estimate would be 50%.
8,67 Soviet soldiers were killed, to 7 million Axis soldiers. The ratio was roughly 1:3. In the end of the war, Germans were killed 2 times more often on average than Soviets.
the germans could win if there wasnt that little man adolf but maby it is better that he was on top or we would all speak german by now. only i h8 that he didnt die earlier because than would those 60 million people that got killed had a peacefull live.
Well, the Third Reich lost 80% of it's troops on the Eastern Front. I'm pretty sure the USSR would've had em eventually.
If forced to commit to the war alone, America probably would've eventually won. They could completely out-produce Germany. Transporting troops would be a problem though.
And Britain did eventually win in NA. Even if Germany had won the BoB, the Royal Navy would probably have made an invasion all but impossible. Not a win, but a bad draw for Britain.
1. The USSR would have been SCREWED without land lease -aside from 15 000 planes and 7000 tanks they got MILLIONS of TONS of ammunition, food, explosives, some 10 000 tractors and locomotives and some 350 000 Truks!!!!!!!!
2. Germany had 300 divisions the USA only 90 of which some 30 were fighting in the pacifi- HOW would the us have beaten germany if they were outnumbered by man and u neede like 5 us taks to destroy 1 german tank??
1. The Americans exaggerated the lend-lease programs and accounted the millions of tons that were lost at sea specifically via routes through the Atlantic to Murmansk, as legit aid to the Soviet Union. Not to mention, significant amounts of supplies were only coming in at early 1943, when Russians were already unstoppable! If you think Willis jeeps and leather boots beat the Germans in the East Front, then good luck with life!
In 1945, foreign truck numbers amounted to one third of the Soviet truck arsenal, not to mention the Soviets adapted their income of these vehicles and limited their own production. The Russians had millions of small-arms, tanks and thousands of aircraft after the war, of which could have been made into trucks anyhow if needed! No Westerner has ever 'saved' Russia, as the saying goes:
At the end of WW2 trucks from the west made over 80% of the whole USSR truck force- oh and HOW would the USSR have produced the thousands of planes and tanks if it had to produce trucks instead??
By the Way- losses on the eastern front:
by 1943:
Soviet: 10 MILLION dead/captured soldiers 60 000 destroyed tanks and more than 55 000 destroyed palnes
German: more than 1 Million dead/captured soldiers around 10 000 destroyed tanks and around 9000 planes.
The Soviets might have suffered 8 million military casualties, but half of those were incurred at the first year of the war.
Read a serious historian, like Keegan, or Glantz, and they would tell you that from 1943-1945 the Red Army was every inch the fighting machine the Wehrmacht ever was, and more.
The Germans were fighting from the defensive since 1943.
@sashiburidanaryuk hey assfag .what part of the world besides the United States,UK, after 1941' was fighting the Axis Powers assfag. The USSR was Germany BFF thru the Molotov Ribbentropp Pact and invaded Poland together in Sept 1939' yeah when you count germanys cockblock of Finland and invasion of USSR in 22 June 1941! That would explain your wehrmacht penis envy.
@fluffy1931 So what is this a history lesson? and then who should envy? Shut up and goes to reread my first comment and reply when trying to be a bit 'less arrogant understand? assfag Your Mother shitty idiot
@fluffy1931 as i thought you're an ignorant hick. you can only offend other people and leave no-sense and spam comment.I'll not reply to you anymore go play tetris
Here are the axis countries. Germany, Italy, Japan AND Croatia, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Finland, Estonia, Latvia AND several hundreds of thousands of VOLUNTEERS from occupied countries who fought on the German side in the war. There was a Dutch SS, A Belgian SS, A French SS (Charlemagne), A Russian SS (Rona), An Ukrainian SS, A Bosnian Muslim SS (Handschar), An Albanian SS. AND millions of slave workers(not just jews) who worked in German weapons factories 'til they died
@sashiburidanaryuk what a stupid comment. This is the sort of shit that makes people believe Germany 'deserved' to win. Most powerful army, my ass! What is a powerful army? Yes, it's disciplined, had good weapons, is well organized - OK so what, they had that, but. You saying the US army isn't, or the Soviets or the small army of Finland? It was strategy, nothing to do with the army, that Germany into a formidable position and then got them totally decimated.
@mistersmith6000 well im pretty sure it was mostly just the amount of supplies countries like Russia and usa could dish out so fast while Germany took a long time in producing its hardware the Russian's basicaly threw their tanks at Germany with no ammunition or a real plan they just made them ram the German tanks and no tank is worth jack if its main gun is disabled like that.
@sashiburidanaryuk hmm well It was bascily his army agaisnt the BEF and a small ammount of French forces at the start. When He had to fight vrs All three nations, as in after D-day it was bascily game over.
Wow... i am impressed by the comments here, most of them are correct ^^
I wonder what would have happend if UK and USA did not attack the Western Front and Hilter was able to move his 60 western devisions to support the war in the East. Could the Russians have still won? my guess is yes :P
@sashiburidanaryuk Mostly, they had the element of surprise and had a massive head start at mobilization. As later soviet commanders would prove, their blitz strategy was sort of a one hit wonder :/ It all depended on the enemy being unprepared to handle a breakthrough.
Once everyone got used to tanks and mechanized infantry and had gotten their industry into full gear, German attacks got less effective and their tech advantage slipped. By the end, only their tanks were the best.
@kalinkasixtyfour yeah the tiger tank was a gigantic tank but nothing could stand a russian T 34 ramming them teh russian's would throw their tanks and men away like that just because they could produce so many.
I have heard that when allies entered Germany, the people looked at them like the were evil. Propaganda films like this that said Germany was still well and not on the brink of defeat probably had something to do with that.
Allies? They appeared at the end of the war. Nazi just couldn't handle war on two fronts, thats why they succeeded. Everybody knows that Russians won the war. Just who captured Berlin in 45? The very heart of the nazi
It wasnt that Hitler underestimated everyone. It is a popular belief that Hitler was suffering from Parkinson's disease and maybe even Syphilis. He knew his time was limited and so he opened a two front war. Had his time not been limited, we would probably all be speaking German.
OH bull shit! I guess that's Napoleon's excuse for meeting his waterloo then too? Some claim he had Syphilis also! I find that kind of funny! No. I find that to be funny as hell actually! All these insane dictators running around with syphilis because no real woman will screw them! They have to do whores! I'm LMMFAO!
Yeah don't contribute it to the insanity and lust for world domination, that ultimately spells their doom!
All you people who are saying that Russia wan the war and not America. Think of this, America had the Jappanese to deal with, they were considered the priority. America didn't even declare war on Germany, Germany declared war on America. All teh Allies won, Russia, America, The United Kingdom, Canada, and all the european resistance fighters. My hat goes off especialy to those partisans and resistance fighters.
The Allies never "truly" won, its because hitler's actions of underestimating his enemies, and his war actions were his downfall. America wouldn't have done anything if Hitler stopped attacking Brittan, and if it was taken out, we all would be doomed.
Quite possibly the best LOSING Army in history, but obvously not the best overall. I do concede that all things being equal with men and equipment, the Wermacht would have crushed the Red Army and were well on their way to doing just that before Roosevelt armed them to the teeth with the lend-lease agreement.
Everything is relative, the fewer soldiers you have the more you train and arm them. Russia used human wave tactics b/c it had the man power to do it. So to be the best army, you have to be able to overcome the otehr army, given its functions and purpose. So in WWII red army > germany b/c soviet won.
Hitler underestimated everyone. He never traveled outside of Germany/Austria and only spoke German (and not very well at that). He considered Churchill to be a lazy drunk and Roosevelt to be a hopeless cripple and mistook FDR's restrained tone for weakness and believe Roosevelt would never act when pushed.
so think of thise if 20 per cent of the army and with no air support and hugely outnumbered was able to hold out for a year then think what if the whole german army was fighting USA..r if USA was in europe it wouldve been blitzkrieged in weeks u dumb yank...
so stop bullshiting with we won the war...u just help the russians who where bearing the war..u just bombed citys ad killed civ and massed a huge number of troops i order to be the superb german forces...and when the norm assaults began othig of the wall was intackt really thats BS american propaganda americans assualting a intact wall omg lol
lol u dumbass it wasnt the americans who won the war...lol in 1944 the russians where owning the germans and only 20 per cent of the german army was fighting the allied..and dot forgot they last 1 year in france altho having no air supremacy being hugely outnumbered...ad wtf u had many failures even in the cristmas of 1944 when u fucked market garden and on the assaults on siefrig line with huge number of troops
Germany had the best army in WW2,no doubt about it!The SS really kicked those American,English and Russian asses!Well in the end the Germans were outnumbered and the defeat was inevedable.But they concoured almost the whole Europe and Africa alone and then withstanded the attacks from the allies in the end very,very long until....yeah too bad that Germans didn´t win the war,would have loved the world without russians.Oh i hate those cocroach Russians so much!
The German Wehrmacht was the best army in history!More than 50 countries supported the allies,including russia.Germany was extremly outnumbered and out industrialized.But we held the stand for 6 years! great video!
I'm not sure it would...most Germans knew that the Oder river was closer to Berlin than, say, Leningrad or Stalingrad. Those Germans who hated Hitler might have taken some comfort unless they were in the concentration camps, whose inmates were being force-marched toward the Fatherland.
what is an american soldier? them are nothing!! german and russian soldiers are the best! we fight the hole war. the american come a few month before the war was over. the did nothing! why they didn't fight from the beginning? because their where afraid that germans kicked their asses. at the end, the americans fight against old people and children, thats not honer!
A man will go to war for two things,his pride in his home land, or you are ordered to th front. At this time in the war they just defend there homeland
i must say that the typical wwii german soldier was very brave and courageuos in addition the had the best training there was, so, to that point they were good
Not true. Read more about the German army and meet some of those still living. They fought willingly and ferociously for their country, not Hitler, to the end. To smile and march proud in the face of defeat is typically German... it's in their blood.
Boring
CuteSkateBrainPanda 4 months ago
Anyone who can watch this and other similar videos without concluding the Nazi's were the among the best propagandists in history, is incapable of recognizing overwhelming evidence. .
P1B1U1H1 1 year ago
@P1B1U1H1
It's propaganda...It is supposed to be "boring". But on the other hand, it is interesting...
wehrmachtoberst 4 months ago
Ehre sei den weiblinger Helden, Sieg dem Korradin!
vitoparisi3 1 year ago
hitler made a mistake in atacking london and not continuing in bombng aeroprts.and he hoped for a peace whith england strategic peace,in the vest.
he was afraid for uss and urss and england join forces.not their power,their more resources,i am a great strateg i admire rommel,and the german wermarcht blitzkrieg.
micutzusef 2 years ago 10
@micutzusef right england won this war alone , you know the stuff . Epic youtube experts
Stranskii 9 months ago
@micutzusef Goering tried everything in the Battle of the Britain and failed, And Hitler turned to bombing British Cities out of revenge and to smash there morale into surrender that also failed, They tried to starve Britain and that also failed! Also Rommel was the desert fox, And when Monty the British Hound became Leader of the 8th Army they hunted Rommel down like the common fox he was. Hitler made the mistake to fight on many fronts and against the worlds superpowers!
martynrobin121 8 months ago
@martynrobin121 i think it would be a gross understatement to call Rommel a common fox :/
Myieek 7 months ago
@Myieek Rommel was the Desert Fox, That was his nickname and Monty was the British Hound sent to defeat the Fox. Sure Rommel was a great Leader and he done great, However alot of the best Generals,Leaders in history have found themselfs running away from the British, Napolean the Greatest Leader in history humiliated by a outnumbered British Forces to thousands of years ago the Great Ceasar defeated by the Britain Celts,etc
martynrobin121 7 months ago
bulsheviks can suck mien dick
deathsquad89capo 2 years ago
god created some evil mothers
BigBishop1 2 years ago
This has all been educational. The comments, I mean, not the propaganda . I dare to think how different the world would be if Hitler had not invaded the Ukraine and let the USSR be for a longer time. Perhaps they may have conquered Europe before we had the opportunity to intervene. They may have massed even larger armies as would the USSR in a cold war much like that which we had. Perhaps we would be asked to choose sides between communist Russia and Nazi Germany. Thoughts?
GenoPeppino 2 years ago 2
@GenoPeppino
That's why the Americans stayed out of the war for a long time. Harry S.Truman (who only was vice president at the time) told that he didn't mind the nazis and communists fighing each other and that the USA should support whatever side was losing. Although he admitted he'd rather see the nazis lose.
Hitler knew that 1941 was the last chance he had to invade the USSR,because he was aware they were rapidly increasing their weapons production.By 1942 the USSR would be better prepared
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@GenoPeppino
Hitler knew that if he didn't invade the USSR in 1941, Stalin might attack him in 1942. Also at the time the German army was incredibly dependant on the oil from Romanian oil fields and if the USSR took those, then the initiative would be lost for the Germans. Hitler knew very well it was a gamble invading the USSR and that if they didn't get a quick victory then they'd be in deep shit, but he saw no other options, even if his generals were against it.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@GenoPeppino
Uh, Germany DID conquear all Europe save for Great Britain before you interveined. The only countries that weren't conquered were other axis countries and "neutral" fascist countries like Spain and Portugal, as well as those neutral countries which provided Germany with money and steel (Switzerland and Sweden).
80 percent of all German casaulties were on the Eastern Front so you not intervening would lead to a longer war but Nazi Germany would still lose eventually. Resources.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
i´m not sure, but i suppose the germans had to smile on the videos . the people should think that they win the war. if the soldiers didn´t smile, they were killed by execution
Deidara2712 2 years ago
What's that first song called?
UserDirk580 2 years ago
The Soviet red army only had 4 to 5million soldiers in it.
JBBlitz 2 years ago
ALL your numbers are WRONG:
Alone in 1941 3 Million Soviet soldiers were captured and 3 Million killed.
20 Soviet soldier died for 1 germany!!!!
From 1942-1945 another 5 Million were killed and another 5 Million captured.
Soviet soldiers died in Germany captivity were 3,4 Mio- germans in Soviet around 1 Million- of the 110 000 captured at Stalingrad only 5000 returned.
Axis casultees were 6,5 Mio dead- Allied were around 15..
And since 1943 the USSR got an adwantage of 1:4 in tanks +planes
Denorius 2 years ago
Western Aliied casualties amounted to less than 1-million troops KIA on all fronts. Stalin & Beria purged the USSR's military of 30,000+ good officers before WWII, and that was one of the main reasons if not the main reason the USSR suffered so many causalties in the frist 2-years of the war.
christof139 2 years ago
@christof139
The reason the western casualties amounted to less is because the MAJORITY of Germans were fighting on the Eastern Front, and it was the MAIN front as far as Hitler and his generals were concerned and were the war would be won or lost. Here's a fact for you which you can verify in any good history book about WW2. 80% of all German casaulties in WW2 were on the eastern front, and since they fought 3 bloody years there before you landed in France it makes perfect sense.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@christof139
On D-day there were some 60 German divisions in France, compared to over 240 German divisions spread out on the HUGE Eastern Front trying to hold the Red Army back. The Battle of Kursk was the largest tank battle in all WW2 and the theatre which took the most human lives on both sides was the Eastern front.
Also axis countries like Hungary (300,000dead), Romania(350,000dead), Bulgaria, Finland, Croatia and many others fought on the Eastern Front and died there.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@christof139
Western allies never faced the amount of German panzer forces, heavy guns, men and equipment they had on the Eastern Front.
American live under the illusion they defeated Germany when they invaded France in 1944, when millions of Germans already had died in the war and they were already retreating on the Eastern Front.
And before you mention the lend-lease I can tell you that didn't come in larger numbers until 1943, it was paid with gold and blood. A good deal for the yanks.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@McLarenMercedes, I know much more of hsitory than you, & the USA entered the war in the West in Nov. 1942 in N. Africa so go get bent. I also know much more than you about the East Front. You are deluded in thinking you are the only one that knows anything, & that makes you a silly fool.
christof139 1 year ago
@christof139 North africa only 0000001% of the german army was in North africa you clown.
Stranskii 9 months ago
@McLarenMercedes I have actualy talked to a lot of american's who still think they won Viet Nam
Myieek 7 months ago
@Denorius
MYTH. Total BULL that 20 more Soviets soldiers that died than Germans. Since 80 percent of all German casualties were on the Eastern Front, and around 4 million Germans died there (not counting the hundreds of thousands of Romanians, Italians, Hungarians and other Axis countries fighting there).
Now if what you say is true that 20 times more Soviet soldiers died then that would be 80 million Soviet soldiers dead. The whole war killed 60 million which was both soldiers AND civilians.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@Denorius
How are you counting anyway? If you say the Allies lost 15 million and the Axis only 6,5 million (which is total bull, because that was just the total number of Germans dead, and you fail to mention the 3 million dead Japanese and other axis countries)
Anyway 15 million isn't 20 times more than 6,5 million in ANY case so you're contradicting yourself quite clearly.
Anybody who doesn't know 80 percent of all German casaulties were on the Eastern front and counts a 20 to 1 ratio has
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@Denorius
...has no business telling others their numbers are WRONG.
Will you please tell us all where you found those numbers??
Not even 2 Soviet soldiers died for each German. Not even if you count all the Soviet civilians who were shot by the Germans.
I guess you're either a Finn or from one of those Baltic countries, they like to exaggerate a lie a lot. Finns for instance wants us to believe they killed 1 million Soviet troops for 90,000 lost of their own. Haha.
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
Soviets died in german captivity - 3,000,000.
Germans died in soviet captivity - 300,000
Now what if Soviets have killed as many German prisoners as Germans?
Who would have more casualties?
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
The USSR had thousands of hundreds of tanks, aircraft and small-arms left after the war, if there was no lend-lease, trucks would have been VERY easily produced! The Lend-lease no where near made 80% of USSR's truck forces, maximum estimate would be 50%.
8,67 Soviet soldiers were killed, to 7 million Axis soldiers. The ratio was roughly 1:3. In the end of the war, Germans were killed 2 times more often on average than Soviets.
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
the germans could win if there wasnt that little man adolf but maby it is better that he was on top or we would all speak german by now. only i h8 that he didnt die earlier because than would those 60 million people that got killed had a peacefull live.
Kopschot94 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heil hitler
jinkazamadark 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hail hitler
udepo 2 years ago
hail
MusicVampirer 2 years ago
Did you spell it intentional wrong?
If not: It is spelled "Heil".
And if your post was not meant as a joke: Shame on you!
VitoPossilipo 2 years ago
if only ONE of the big three would have been missing germany would have won the war.
US troops needed like 6 Months to conquer NA and a YEAR to conquere italy-allthougt outnumbering the germans 3:1 or more.
The british army was constantly beaten by Rommel in NA allthough outnumbering him 3:1 or more.
and as for the ussr-they got some 15 000 planes and 7000 tanks through land lease and food, truck,amunition etc.
oh and did i mention-the red army marched with us boots they got 13 mil pairs!!!
Denorius 2 years ago 4
Well, the Third Reich lost 80% of it's troops on the Eastern Front. I'm pretty sure the USSR would've had em eventually.
If forced to commit to the war alone, America probably would've eventually won. They could completely out-produce Germany. Transporting troops would be a problem though.
And Britain did eventually win in NA. Even if Germany had won the BoB, the Royal Navy would probably have made an invasion all but impossible. Not a win, but a bad draw for Britain.
vulnerabledonkey 2 years ago
All your claims are COMPLETELY ridiculous!!
1. The USSR would have been SCREWED without land lease -aside from 15 000 planes and 7000 tanks they got MILLIONS of TONS of ammunition, food, explosives, some 10 000 tractors and locomotives and some 350 000 Truks!!!!!!!!
2. Germany had 300 divisions the USA only 90 of which some 30 were fighting in the pacifi- HOW would the us have beaten germany if they were outnumbered by man and u neede like 5 us taks to destroy 1 german tank??
Denorius 2 years ago 2
Bombers, my boy, Bombers.
beserker5 2 years ago
1. The Americans exaggerated the lend-lease programs and accounted the millions of tons that were lost at sea specifically via routes through the Atlantic to Murmansk, as legit aid to the Soviet Union. Not to mention, significant amounts of supplies were only coming in at early 1943, when Russians were already unstoppable! If you think Willis jeeps and leather boots beat the Germans in the East Front, then good luck with life!
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
Yes Willi jeeps and leather boots did do a LOT to help the USSR tro win against germany!!!
The USSR produced 150 000 trucks during ww2 and it got 375 000 from the west.
The Germans destroyed around 150 000 soviet trucks
HOW EXACTLY would the red army have transported the war material and remained mobile if they would have kept the truck numer constantly at 20 000 or
30 000?
Western land-lease saved the USSR and did contribute A LOT to the defeat of germany!
U cant simply ignore the facts
Denorius 2 years ago
In 1945, foreign truck numbers amounted to one third of the Soviet truck arsenal, not to mention the Soviets adapted their income of these vehicles and limited their own production. The Russians had millions of small-arms, tanks and thousands of aircraft after the war, of which could have been made into trucks anyhow if needed! No Westerner has ever 'saved' Russia, as the saying goes:
Only the Russians can conquer Russia!
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
One Third?? Ur dreaming!!
At the end of WW2 trucks from the west made over 80% of the whole USSR truck force- oh and HOW would the USSR have produced the thousands of planes and tanks if it had to produce trucks instead??
By the Way- losses on the eastern front:
by 1943:
Soviet: 10 MILLION dead/captured soldiers 60 000 destroyed tanks and more than 55 000 destroyed palnes
German: more than 1 Million dead/captured soldiers around 10 000 destroyed tanks and around 9000 planes.
Hm. 1:6
Denorius 2 years ago
The Soviets might have suffered 8 million military casualties, but half of those were incurred at the first year of the war.
Read a serious historian, like Keegan, or Glantz, and they would tell you that from 1943-1945 the Red Army was every inch the fighting machine the Wehrmacht ever was, and more.
The Germans were fighting from the defensive since 1943.
MoskvaPeterburg 2 years ago
there's only one thing to say: wehrmacht was the most powerful army seen on the earth....3 countries against the world....6 years of war, incredible!
sashiburidanaryuk 2 years ago 20
@sashiburidanaryuk put the penis sandwich back in your mouth dude. your officially gay.
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 and you are definitively a moron
sashiburidanaryuk 1 year ago
@sashiburidanaryuk hey assfag .what part of the world besides the United States,UK, after 1941' was fighting the Axis Powers assfag. The USSR was Germany BFF thru the Molotov Ribbentropp Pact and invaded Poland together in Sept 1939' yeah when you count germanys cockblock of Finland and invasion of USSR in 22 June 1941! That would explain your wehrmacht penis envy.
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 So what is this a history lesson? and then who should envy? Shut up and goes to reread my first comment and reply when trying to be a bit 'less arrogant understand? assfag Your Mother shitty idiot
sashiburidanaryuk 1 year ago
@sashiburidanaryuk go fuck yourself sideways and learn english assfag.
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@fluffy1931 as i thought you're an ignorant hick. you can only offend other people and leave no-sense and spam comment.I'll not reply to you anymore go play tetris
sashiburidanaryuk 1 year ago
@sashiburidanaryuk SPARTA!!!
fluffy1931 1 year ago
@sashiburidanaryuk thumbs up for tetris!
Myieek 7 months ago
@Myieek thumbs up for smart comments
sashiburidanaryuk 7 months ago
@sashiburidanaryuk
Here are the axis countries. Germany, Italy, Japan AND Croatia, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Finland, Estonia, Latvia AND several hundreds of thousands of VOLUNTEERS from occupied countries who fought on the German side in the war. There was a Dutch SS, A Belgian SS, A French SS (Charlemagne), A Russian SS (Rona), An Ukrainian SS, A Bosnian Muslim SS (Handschar), An Albanian SS. AND millions of slave workers(not just jews) who worked in German weapons factories 'til they died
McLarenMercedes 1 year ago
@McLarenMercedes forgot Polish SS
Myieek 7 months ago
@sashiburidanaryuk what a stupid comment. This is the sort of shit that makes people believe Germany 'deserved' to win. Most powerful army, my ass! What is a powerful army? Yes, it's disciplined, had good weapons, is well organized - OK so what, they had that, but. You saying the US army isn't, or the Soviets or the small army of Finland? It was strategy, nothing to do with the army, that Germany into a formidable position and then got them totally decimated.
mistersmith6000 1 year ago
@mistersmith6000 well im pretty sure it was mostly just the amount of supplies countries like Russia and usa could dish out so fast while Germany took a long time in producing its hardware the Russian's basicaly threw their tanks at Germany with no ammunition or a real plan they just made them ram the German tanks and no tank is worth jack if its main gun is disabled like that.
Myieek 7 months ago
@sashiburidanaryuk hmm well It was bascily his army agaisnt the BEF and a small ammount of French forces at the start. When He had to fight vrs All three nations, as in after D-day it was bascily game over.
fecto3210 1 year ago
Wow... i am impressed by the comments here, most of them are correct ^^
I wonder what would have happend if UK and USA did not attack the Western Front and Hilter was able to move his 60 western devisions to support the war in the East. Could the Russians have still won? my guess is yes :P
fecto3210 1 year ago
@fecto3210 what u think, if germany not attack ussr , what happend to uk and usa
msn4n 1 year ago
@msn4n I think he would have taken our little island :(. I'm not sure about U.S.A though
fecto3210 1 year ago
@sashiburidanaryuk Mostly, they had the element of surprise and had a massive head start at mobilization. As later soviet commanders would prove, their blitz strategy was sort of a one hit wonder :/ It all depended on the enemy being unprepared to handle a breakthrough.
Once everyone got used to tanks and mechanized infantry and had gotten their industry into full gear, German attacks got less effective and their tech advantage slipped. By the end, only their tanks were the best.
kalinkasixtyfour 1 year ago
@kalinkasixtyfour yeah the tiger tank was a gigantic tank but nothing could stand a russian T 34 ramming them teh russian's would throw their tanks and men away like that just because they could produce so many.
Myieek 7 months ago
@sashiburidanaryuk Yeah they should really be proud at what they accomplished -.-
lilkid88 8 months ago
@sashiburidanaryuk actually it was seven (Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Croatia)
Iruth27 8 months ago
An American named Prescot Bush was busy dealing business as usual with the Nazis in 1940. The "allies" were busy fighting a war.
DrumzzCool 3 years ago
Centuries before Christ, the greek Plato told:"Only the deads saw the end of war".
daltonagre 3 years ago
correct
metalrod23 3 years ago
as long as there are humans there will be war
metalrod23 3 years ago
I have heard that when allies entered Germany, the people looked at them like the were evil. Propaganda films like this that said Germany was still well and not on the brink of defeat probably had something to do with that.
yuyuyu25 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The war is over and the allies won end of story. Now everyone stop posting all these comments and just be happy your alive.
3Dinvent 3 years ago
hohohohohoho
allies come to europe about 1943
but the communist's work was hardest...
I'm pretty sure the allies can't keep
the attack of the germans troops like the
russian troops have been resist.
NaXxOw 3 years ago
Allies? They appeared at the end of the war. Nazi just couldn't handle war on two fronts, thats why they succeeded. Everybody knows that Russians won the war. Just who captured Berlin in 45? The very heart of the nazi
okti512 3 years ago
Comment removed
bushgam 3 years ago 8
everyone just shut and enjoy the film ..Christ...everyone always thinks they know it all.
skot66 3 years ago
Ok i admit...I..have..no..brain! :(
AndreasL22 3 years ago
It wasnt that Hitler underestimated everyone. It is a popular belief that Hitler was suffering from Parkinson's disease and maybe even Syphilis. He knew his time was limited and so he opened a two front war. Had his time not been limited, we would probably all be speaking German.
kralpage 3 years ago
Oh really? I always thought he was just being cocky to the point of stupidity.
almightysmiley 3 years ago
OH bull shit! I guess that's Napoleon's excuse for meeting his waterloo then too? Some claim he had Syphilis also! I find that kind of funny! No. I find that to be funny as hell actually! All these insane dictators running around with syphilis because no real woman will screw them! They have to do whores! I'm LMMFAO!
Yeah don't contribute it to the insanity and lust for world domination, that ultimately spells their doom!
MaXG65 3 years ago
...and they hung happily ever after
easycheezy 4 years ago
All you people who are saying that Russia wan the war and not America. Think of this, America had the Jappanese to deal with, they were considered the priority. America didn't even declare war on Germany, Germany declared war on America. All teh Allies won, Russia, America, The United Kingdom, Canada, and all the european resistance fighters. My hat goes off especialy to those partisans and resistance fighters.
ddingbatt 4 years ago
Actually, Roosevelt and Churchill made it a priorityto defeat Germany first, then Japan. That's a matter of historical record
kmillard 4 years ago
The Allies never "truly" won, its because hitler's actions of underestimating his enemies, and his war actions were his downfall. America wouldn't have done anything if Hitler stopped attacking Brittan, and if it was taken out, we all would be doomed.
voltage1324 4 years ago
This Film makes me want to take a gun
an shoot some bolsheviks
unbehagen1000 4 years ago
GERMAN ARMY - BEST ARMY IN HISTORY!
GERMANY76 4 years ago 4
*cough* who lost two world wars
johngrong6859 4 years ago 3
Quite possibly the best LOSING Army in history, but obvously not the best overall. I do concede that all things being equal with men and equipment, the Wermacht would have crushed the Red Army and were well on their way to doing just that before Roosevelt armed them to the teeth with the lend-lease agreement.
kmillard 4 years ago
Everything is relative, the fewer soldiers you have the more you train and arm them. Russia used human wave tactics b/c it had the man power to do it. So to be the best army, you have to be able to overcome the otehr army, given its functions and purpose. So in WWII red army > germany b/c soviet won.
Ayeere 3 years ago
So what you are saying, is that the ratio German-Russian forces where 1-1. Thats just bullshit, get a grip!
ZL4D 4 years ago
heil
redcoat92 4 years ago
the Germans under estimated the Russians,the Russians alone lost 20 million of its population to the war.
inagod 4 years ago
Hitler underestimated everyone. He never traveled outside of Germany/Austria and only spoke German (and not very well at that). He considered Churchill to be a lazy drunk and Roosevelt to be a hopeless cripple and mistook FDR's restrained tone for weakness and believe Roosevelt would never act when pushed.
kmillard 4 years ago
wahnsinn wie ein 80-millionen-menschen-volk beinahe die ganze welt besiegt hat oder???
Erwinrecords 4 years ago
so think of thise if 20 per cent of the army and with no air support and hugely outnumbered was able to hold out for a year then think what if the whole german army was fighting USA..r if USA was in europe it wouldve been blitzkrieged in weeks u dumb yank...
pawnp4 4 years ago
so stop bullshiting with we won the war...u just help the russians who where bearing the war..u just bombed citys ad killed civ and massed a huge number of troops i order to be the superb german forces...and when the norm assaults began othig of the wall was intackt really thats BS american propaganda americans assualting a intact wall omg lol
pawnp4 4 years ago 2
lol u dumbass it wasnt the americans who won the war...lol in 1944 the russians where owning the germans and only 20 per cent of the german army was fighting the allied..and dot forgot they last 1 year in france altho having no air supremacy being hugely outnumbered...ad wtf u had many failures even in the cristmas of 1944 when u fucked market garden and on the assaults on siefrig line with huge number of troops
pawnp4 4 years ago
This propaganda vid was complied after Goebbles visited Schoner's front. The troops in this vid are among the last decent troops left in Germany.
The other elite formations had already been sent down south into the mountains. That's why the last SS units surrendered to Patton.
Extremely shortly after this was broadcast the battle of Berlin began.
It is now known that the Russians ... under Stalin's instructions ... smashed each other as well as the Nazis: 600,000 dead Russians as a result.
staydput 4 years ago
you know a lot of people blame the crippling of germany aftet ww1 to the rise of the Nazi, so it was everyones fault, not just germanys
sebranka 5 years ago
I blame it on the Communists that murdered over 100 million people! Stalin should've been hanged!
crud3w4re 4 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Germany had the best army in WW2,no doubt about it!The SS really kicked those American,English and Russian asses!Well in the end the Germans were outnumbered and the defeat was inevedable.But they concoured almost the whole Europe and Africa alone and then withstanded the attacks from the allies in the end very,very long until....yeah too bad that Germans didn´t win the war,would have loved the world without russians.Oh i hate those cocroach Russians so much!
Ferschumi 5 years ago
The German Wehrmacht was the best army in history!More than 50 countries supported the allies,including russia.Germany was extremly outnumbered and out industrialized.But we held the stand for 6 years! great video!
GERMANY76 5 years ago
I'm not sure it would...most Germans knew that the Oder river was closer to Berlin than, say, Leningrad or Stalingrad. Those Germans who hated Hitler might have taken some comfort unless they were in the concentration camps, whose inmates were being force-marched toward the Fatherland.
Yamanoneko 5 years ago
most germans reguardless were terrified of the russians because they knew the Russian soldier would not be forgiving, and would not discriminate.
MilitaryHistory 5 years ago
my comment to debonondeniel not true acctually, hitlar planned to take over and be in command. He never promised anyone wealth or luxerly.
lilcases09 5 years ago
But they lost it bravely!!!
And the "heroes" that have survived were simply to fucking frightened to fight to the end of war, dying for fatherland!
If the Russian side had such bravery soldiers, the soviets would have lost the war.
alpha125rbf 5 years ago
what are you talking about?
what is an american soldier? them are nothing!! german and russian soldiers are the best! we fight the hole war. the american come a few month before the war was over. the did nothing! why they didn't fight from the beginning? because their where afraid that germans kicked their asses. at the end, the americans fight against old people and children, thats not honer!
nurichverdammt 5 years ago
Am besten wäre es, wenn man euch dreckiges Nazipack in eure eigenen KZs sperrt und vergast!
Bombsquad85 5 years ago
Nieder mit dem Kommunismus und Bolschewiggen!!!
Gruß!
Amalanoman 5 years ago
the propoganda was like all propoganda bull shit. But it made the Germans back home sleep a bit easier for those remaining months.
rexthebarker 5 years ago
If Hitler won the war us europeans would be living in a better way of life
debonodaniel 5 years ago
It is tragicomic how the Nazis tried to cast themselves as the saviours and protectors of Europe.
gabrielg01 5 years ago
noone can deny that the german wehrmacht had the best trained, brave and ferociously soldiers that could be found in the world war ii.
KarlArsch2223 5 years ago
Rote flut!!! Deutschland!!! Vorwertz!!!
stuckh 5 years ago
german soldiers rulezzz!!!
Seppl88 5 years ago
the propaganda inspears hope in the soldiers that is why they made it
SSVITMAN 5 years ago
WWII soldiers where much harder then the average modern day soldier.
Rl831 5 years ago
A man will go to war for two things,his pride in his home land, or you are ordered to th front. At this time in the war they just defend there homeland
panzertank3945 5 years ago
patton was right.if found between the red & german armies,he would have killed everyone in all directions.papa jo killed his people same as hitler.
chopin77 5 years ago
Wehrmacht fight vs Red Bastards
reichskanzlei 5 years ago
It was the Germans who attacked those 'bastards'. Germany commited incredible crimes on occupied territories.
yarovitek 5 years ago 2
But first they were allies. And that "bastards" also commited incredible crimes on occupied territories. Both are worth themselves.
Devales 5 years ago
i must say that the typical wwii german soldier was very brave and courageuos in addition the had the best training there was, so, to that point they were good
trilomann 5 years ago
Not true. Read more about the German army and meet some of those still living. They fought willingly and ferociously for their country, not Hitler, to the end. To smile and march proud in the face of defeat is typically German... it's in their blood.
guygatois 5 years ago
its typical because they lose so much
johngrong6859 4 years ago
HAHA those soldiers smiling were doing so, probably at gun point
economistBR 5 years ago
lol
evildudeteh 5 years ago
they were the masters of propaganda
FlakeyWaffle 5 years ago
There was not much that held Germany together in the time of the nazi reign. But Goebbels propaganda machinerie certainly was the biggest part.
therealnemini 5 years ago