Sure, witness heard a shot from the grassy knoll. But, their brain is telling them not to look at the sewer area for a gunman because no ones their. Their brain then looks for the next viable option, behind the fence. The rifle report would also reverberate off the fencing, making it seem that the spot. There is a photo of smoke lingering in the air in this vicinity. Obviously the wind could carry the smoke several yards before the shot is taken.
these videos that state they are PROOF in the title,make me just dismiss them quicker,pretty much like saying IM RIGHT YOUR WRONG even before youve watched it,damn shame people like this are so arrogant they cant provide you with evidence and let you make your own mind up,this kinda narrow minded reasoning is whats been holding there theories back for years,damn shame they will never realise this.
i could find some truth in this ihave herd of people reporting that they herd a shot along the street and i have also read about people reporting a man with a rifle exiting the trinity river, also people smelling gun powder smoke
Q, it's funny when you look at how many person's duck or move away due to shot's fired, or if a surpressor was used, then the acustic's would not have recorded the sound's at least 4 shot's no matter how far the bike was, in the Z film including Zapurder, they just stand there, yet a shot comes from his Right and about 20 / 30 yards to his right, the Z film has been changed full stop.
What babble. Not a shred of science or hard evidence in the whole video. What is hard to accept, it seems, is that a pathetic white dude with identity problems and a lust for power shot Kennedy. I know it is not romantic and perhaps disappointing to deal with the bland truth. But, it is those seeking aggrandizement that kill or try to kill our Presidents. Nothing else to see here folks, you can move on now.
@sanfrancisco89 The black and white pre-autopsy photo of Kennedy on his back clearly shows a bullet hole high on his forehead. An entrance wound which blew out the back of his head. It had to be more frontal than to the right to not blow out the left back of the head. In the Z film one can clearly see pieces of his head fly upward which would fit a sewer shot. He seems to be lifted upwards.
@nihploduoykuf I read somewhere that some witnesses reported that the last shot,(headshot) echoed as if fired from a sewer and some in the motorcade reported smelling gunpowder.
It's hard to know which researcher is correct. Some have said it came from the Grassy Knoll, some have said it came from the Triple Underpass, and this man says it came from the sewer. Obviously we know it didn't come from the Book Depository by Oswald, but it may be some years before we have the technology to get a consensus on this. Of course, shots may have come from multiple locations like many witnesses and others have said in the past.
Who shot Kennedy? The big question, debates about whether it was Oswald, Johnson or the Federal Reserve, who knows, honestly!! In my opinion I think he was shot so he'd remain quiet and not progress with plans he had in store for us back in the 60's.. As far government goes, because I see this topic a lot in the comments, the government does what it is told to do, plain and simple, not their fault we pay taxes and go to war.. I say this because WAR brings revenue although we spend plenty oursel
I'd like for someone who isn't just another common, everyday smart ass to give their opinion on the "Stickman" that we see also, when we are supposed to be th
Okay, BlueWolfe38, anyone who disagrees with you is in need of psychological help. Why would they subject themselves to the rude crude type of criticism that isn't even constructive that you dish out? I am so glad I have never been married to you. How many brownie points do you think you've won today with your government. You mistakingly think they care. They don't. They confiscated everybody's camera because we weren't like Russia?!
This poor old fool was simply another idiot exploited by Conspiracy Theorists. He quite obviously was in need of psychological help. In over 48 years not one arrest of an individual trigger, not one eyewitness, not one spent shell, not one bullet or bullet fragment entered into evidence using ballistic science. All medical evidence, autopsy evidence, photographic and film evidence supporting and affirming the finding of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated John F. Kennedy.
JFK was shot twice, so here's a theory: Oswald was in the School Book Depository, and the other man was in the storm drain, after Oswald shot JFK in the neck, the other man shot JFK in the head, and they were working together? what about that?
GOD! This is NOT a freaking conspiracy! Oswald killed him! Only because his parents and brothers never payed attention to him. He went to the army. His shooting card Thingy was, ASSAULT: 98/100, SNIPER: 97/100. He then went to Russia to serve as a Soviet. He went back to America to see if he had any media there, but nope. Unfortunately, he didn't like JFK and his campaign promises. So therefore Oswald sniped him. Later on, HE then he was shot by a strip club owner named ' Jack Ruby ' END OF STO
It is simple to prove the conspiracy.Between the second and third shots, LHO had to reload the weapon, find the head of JFK and shoot again, the time marked on the video zapruther between the second and third shots are 4 seconds in the video is a tangible proof. This maneuver like hitting the lottery. It is impossible for a boy of 24 years can do it. He missed the first shot to 20 feet without having to maneuver.
It is simple to prove the conspiracy.Between the second and third shots, LHO had to reload the weapon, find the head of JFK and shoot again, the time marked on the video zapruther between the second and third shots are 4 seconds in the video is a tangible proof. This maneuver like hitting the lottery. It is impossible for a boy of 24 years can do it. He missed the first shot to 20 feet without having to maneuver. Moving target changes everything. for the caseof JFK this video above is notvalid.
this might explain why the umbrella man pointed his umbrella up high the guy in the drain would probably see and at the ready and the last shots heard did sound different,who knows?
There was a shooter in the car. It's the only thing that adds up. It's how Kennedy and Connolly were shot and it's ow the shooter changed his angle and shot Kennedy in the head.
No NO NO. everyone knows when a bullet enters its a small hole, when it leaves ITS A BIG HOLE. JFK was shot by LHO, he was a trained assassin, he was trained by the U.S. Marines special forces. END OF STORY.
Definitely, I don't know where the idea that Oswald was a bad shooter came from. He was good shot, not an expert but a good shot , his record proves it. And the JFK shooting did not require to be an expert at all. This case is really simple , Oswald did it .
I have solved the Kennedy assassination. I told an FBI agent I concluded he was shot from the trunk.. He said a Mossad agent was in the trunk. Many people knew he was going to be shot, but not many knew there was a shooter in the trunk. The fact Kennedy and Connolly was shot at the same time and the fact that the head shot on frame 313 of the clear videos the bullet exits going towards front of car at ten degrees. No other angle fits the bullet exit. Other shooters were to frame Oswald.
damn i i did a project on this in school and i had photos and try to computerise everything even the sewer but i never thought it would be from the sewer thats very good like i said i only did projects and computerised it but never went there to see HOW and WHERE....JFK just wanted to protect everyone thats all just he forgot to protect himself
I've been viewing the films, the documentaries, the theories. The only thing I know for sure is the extremely erie feeling I get just before JFK gets shot in the head. I realize this does'nt mean alot in terms of determining the truth - is it my own paranoia I feel about my own life that I'm projecting into the JFK shooting?
What the fuck is that video? The has the best technology??? are you kidding me? The pixels of his computers are so big! And by the way you don't need those ridiculously low tech camera he has to see the zapruder film: The right part of the president head blows up. That mean it's an axit wound. THE is NO exit wound at the back of the head , you clearly see it on the zapruder film and the muchmore film or nix film. Therefore he was hit from the back. No wonder this guy was dismissed by the medias
@captainkavern his head was indeed turned to to the left and downwards so in relation to where Oswald supposedly fired from it would have exited his right orbital eye socket or there abouts..instead the wound explodes in the right frontal region and his head goes back and left, as if he was shot from the right from the front, part of his brain and bone matter flew past and in front of people who saw it happen on the cars left and bullets trajectory, the direction just doesn't fit a rear shot
A shot from the grassy knoll would have blown the right side of his head. A shot from the front is the most unlikely (2 men seating in front of him) . A precise look a tthe zapruder film shows that his head moves foreward and then he goes back and to the left (a muscular reflex due to the shot in the brain). plus, the brain debris go clearly forward. All of this is not obvious but . A shot from the book depository is the most likely...
@captainkavern glad you are in agreement with the bullet hitting his right side of his head,i didn't say straight in front of him,however at an angle from the right front is more likely,if you look at the shots that were fired in all it shows that there must have been more gunman involved,remember Oswald supposedly missed the first shot which means with the two remaining bullets it is impossible for him to have nicked the guy under the triple bypass,hit kennedy three times , + connally +car
Oops!! I made a mistake I have trouble with my right and my left! No a shot from the grassy knoll would have blown the left part of his head! All the early reports of the shooting mention 3 shots. As far as I know (regarding the credible testimonies and the zapruder film) kennedy is hit at the same time as connally, by the same bullet. And then kennedy is hit in the head, fragment of that shot created the crack in the winshield, (not a bullet hole). And the first shot missed
I call "credible" every testimony wich can be verify with hard evidence. wether it is the favor of a conspiracy or not. The problem is no credible testimony (only speculations) has been made in favor of the conspiration...
@captainkavern i disagree ,if eye witness testimony (the people who were there) describe shots and seeing things that put a second gunman into the frame including Craigs account along with a mauser rifle and many other things that break the law in terms of Oswalds defence legal matters excluding a lawyer present when questioned does need scrutiny just like why the WC suppressed much data that was significant including a hit on jfk in chigago which was very important to the dallas scenario
the single bullet theory is quite simple in fact. one bullet fired by a rifle from a distance of around 70 yards goes through the bodies of two men sitting one in front of the other. in a straight line. Nothing magical with that! It is logical. the conspiracy theory misplace connaly at the time the bullet strikes he is turned to is right and is sitting lower than JFK and more in the center of the car. It's clearly visible on the zapruderfilm.
@captainkavern in fact Kennedy was struck in the throat from the front but was hit in the back also in my opinion,his body movement would indicate the hits and directions,also how do you explain the pristine bullet that went through the dense bone matter doing near impossible twists and turns,the zapruda film was edited and altered once the FBI and investigation on it was done,the frames in question are shortened therefore this explains the WC version of events,two bullets couldn't do all that
If he was struck in the throat from the front , where is that bullet? And why that bullet did not came out of the other side of the throat? At the time he was hit in the throat he was not visible from the grassy knoll. The bullet that hit connaly did not zig zag and turn!!! connaly was turned to his right when the single bullet hit that 's why the angle of entry is not the same as the one as kennedy. ! You are repeating one of the many mistakes in the movie JFK.
@captainkavern the bullet just kind of disapeared i reckon maybe like the mysterious wound on the presidents back and stranger still the tiny hole in his throat before and gaping wound (20 times larger) after ? pristine bullet or near pristine bullet it seems strange to me,connally changed this version in several interviews,you can clearly see him react after kennedy was struck by about 2 seconds the film shows clearly a delay,the zappruda film was edited by the investigators now owned by gov
the wound in the back of the president did not disapear, it is easily vivible on tne autopsy photos, and the jacket and shirt photos. The wound in the neck has been made larger by the tracheotomy . it is a very known fact and even the conspiracy buffs don't discuss that fact. The "single" bullet was not pristine. It was flatenned but not highky dammaged because it encountered only one bone (Connaly's wrist)
@captainkavern the tracheotomy was rejected as the cause of the open wound simply because the tube was the same as the bullet entrance wound it was seen by the docotors and surgeons who tried to revive the president and they clearly stated it was never opened up more than the hole they saw,when seen later by observation they stated it was opened up not by them,altered,these are the guys who were there and saw the wounds why not believe that,earl warren wasn't present in the surgery right?
That point irrelevent. We all know there was a small wound first . Even the Warren Comission agrees. What happened to that wound after doesn't matter. The doctors in parkland couldn't say if it was an entry or an exit wound (they were not perfoming an autopsy, they were trying to save his life). Kennedy Laid on his back and was never turned in parkland. (Have you read the testimonies of the doctors? I guess the answer is no)
@captainkavern "we all know there was a small wound first"
what? so you and the warren commission agree that the wound in the front was a tiny bullet hole enough for a pinky ? yes? that would indicate an entrance wound right! yup they tried to save his life alright not sure what the difference in observation makes tho?
The alterations on the zapruderfim are complete (science) fiction!!!! NOBODY ever proved it. Because it is real! and by the way Zapruder himself answer an interview before his film was processed, and he describes exactely what is on the film
@captainkavern the u.s goverment payed over 16 million dollars for this film to zapruder family which is the most highest payout fro a historic event ever but more interestingly why so much and why do they want it so much? the film is definitely altered in frames at the vital shots just like other footage from other films from other users most were confiscated and never saw the light of day again? but the original was duplicated so it can be compared to the edited piece
@gentle7ways7 THis is completely false. Zapruder made 3 copy of the film he gave 2 to the secret service .
And he sold the rights of the film (50 000 dollars) to time life. He gave 25 000 to Tippit's wife. Why did the government want the film so much? Well , guess what, someone had filmed the murder , maybe they're interested!!!! That film is not altered. You just heard stories that it was . But is was not. And any serious and sane person would agree with me...
The single bullet was not pristine. (even Oliver Stone doesn't say that!) It was not very damaged yes but not pristine. the reason is that bullet hit almost no bones when passing through Kennedy and Connaly. One connaly's rib was hit and his wrist but at that time the bullet had slowed down.
@captainkavern most bullets are and including the italian rifle it supposedly came from bust up from impact and is very rarely retrieved if found even,so this would be remarkably rare,just like oswalds remarkable two shots,like i said before the bullet was most likely from another stretcher in the hospital or planted,and just by coincidence jack ruby was seen at the hospital also?hanging around..doesn't sound impulsive behaviour to me
All the bullet or the fragment retrieved were linked to Oswald carchano. oswald was a sharp shooter better than the average Marine shooting at 200 yards. Kennedy was at 88 yards with an angle almost not changing . Piece of cake!!! Ruby was arranging an add for his club at the dallas morning news at the time of the shooting. He was seen by many peoples. His presence in parkland is completely fictional.
@captainkavern if the shot was so easy to make with a bolt action the time frames he made , why didn't FBI sharp shooters pull off the shots Oswald supposedly made in the same way,they didn't get close to oswalds shots? they are above him in ranking
If the zapruder film is a fake or altered. You have to explain why did Garrison and oliver stone said that film was hidden from the public because it revealed JFK was shot from the front! Why did the government just destroyed it? No they altered it with a technology that still doesn't exist...Impressive. The conspiracy buff are funny when an evidence prove them wrong, they say it's a fake (oswald's backyard photos , the autopsy photo's) com'on!!!
Because if the bullet which hit JFK is not the one which hit connaly you have to explain where does the bullet the hit connally in the back comes from... were are those bullets? they should be somwhere in the limousine or should have hit other passenger. And please don't mention the crack in the windshield which is not a bullet hole ! But probably made by a fragment. Those bullet s where are they? Gone? those bullets are magic! not the single bullet.
@captainkavern i think there were three teams in plaza that day, two buildings in the rear and a team at the front,i think Oswald was a fall guy but was involved IMO
If you were a good investigator, you would know that was is important is not what you think, it his what you have, the evidence. there is no evidence of three shooting team on dealey plaza. Only speculation made by Oliver stone in his very inacurate movie JFK....
So if I get you, when you have 80% of the witnesses in dealey plaza who said they heard 2 or 3 shots, you are gonna ignore them totally and just listen to the rest who said they heard more. Some people saw Oswald withdraw his gun. at the time of the shooting. NO ONE saw anyone fire from the grassy knoll in 1963. (jean hill, lee bowers etc...) people started to claim they saw something in 1978 only...is that credible? com'on!!!
@captainkavern idk about who or what percentages saw or heard 2 or 3 shots but i would guess that the majority said it came from the TBSD because at least 1 shot came from there and plus there were more people around that building than the grassy knoll spot,one witness saw a pipe or gun barrel from the TSBD however nobody saw Oswald holding a gun,well craig was there in 1963 he saw things that would go against the WC he is credible more so than other eyewitness
@captainkavern but WC knew this and created there own version to coincide with LBJ requests most likely, and we have frames of the zapruda film edited down and the one bullet hitting kennedy and connally they suppress info pertaining the damage on the car rear and window plus the damage caused by the drain where buddy walters tried to investigate but coincidences he got his head blown off?
@cruisersism but WC knew this and created there own version to coincide with LBJ requests most likely, and we have frames of the zapruda film edited down and the one bullet hitting kennedy and connally they suppress info pertaining the damage on the car rear and window plus the damage caused by the drain where buddy walters tried to investigate but coincidences he got his head blown off?
I hope the sick bastards that did this suffer the same horrific fate. JFK did not deserve this. Very few people deserve something like this. There are so many explanations and they all seem feasible, but I don't have any clear opinion. Horrible.
@Stan021 You are one of the only people other than myself that mentions that ex order most people don't realize JFK stripped the power from big banks with this order and it is still a valid order to this day. There was no national debt in 1963. When they killed JFK it was the beginning of our end. Very good point maybe one day people will wake the fuck up!!!
I thought this before I watched this ffs!!! Obviously not all the tech stuff (that's not what I do),but the fact that his wife wasn't also killed,meant the shot had to have come from the front,not behind,& either at the Presidents level,or below...That is just plain common sense! If it had come from behind and/or above,or the side for that matter,the bullet would have went through his head & also hit her...
NEVER TRUST ANY GOVERNMENT!
QUESTION EVERYTHING & DON'T BELIEVE WHAT YOU ARE TOLD TO!
@curtisjones400 YOU guys know shit about covert ops the sewer is Exactly where you would want to be....close proximity....concealment from the public......route of escape.......after this day all sewers were sealed for a motorcade...i wonder why....daaaaaaaaaaa the guy speaking in the video is exactly right.
it makes sense because the angle of wich his head is hit from the side, it's almost in an upward push if you will, like head was doing a barrel roll towards his wife beside him.. if te shot had been at ground level or higher, he would would have spun his head, or the bullet wo gone through and hit his wife.
The placement of kennedys head at the time of the fatal shot is leaning forward and looking down. This makes it clear why the autopsy couldnt show the dislodged skull at the back of his head. It would imply a shot from below and up through the skull. If Oswald was the patsy the wound had to confirm a shot from above not below. Looking at the zapruder film you only have to trust your eyes. The fact that mainstream media consistently pushes the shot from behind speaks volumes!
Interesting, but I have a DVD documentary inwhich the curator of the JFK museum in the book depository poh-poohs this very theory and demonstrates that the angles jus cannot work. Insidentally, he also claims that the big white X in the road is in the wrong position
I'm not convinced on the sewer theory - it's not a good angle, and you would literally have one chance to get the shot right assuming you could even see him behind Connolly.
@SuspiciousPatriot Good point, and one that deserves more discussion. Why are the views of the mainstream media so out of whack with those of the public? Since the media reflects society and is composed of people, it normally has views that are proportionate to those of the public. Is it because the media is smarter & more knowledgable on this issue? No. Many of them weren't even there and no very little about it. They are being told they must support the government line.
I bet the guy driving kennedy´s car was hired...hired to reach the "X",the point where he would be aimed and a guy shot from the drain the second shot
Maybe the guy to shoot was the first,from the first shot,but he was far,nervous,it was a bad shot,so they used their B Plan,the drain guy...they would not shot from several places to give reason for conspiracies investigations,it was a mistake from the firt CIA shooter
lol someone should have told this guy not to waste his time. satan worshipers ahoy, freemasons, jesuit order, nights of malta. All the satan worshiping loony toons covered their tracks well
Well, Mr. Wilson, bring your evidence to me. I'll put you and it on TV, Comcast cable in Santa Barbara County and on my YT channel. I have known since I read the faked up WARREN Report, that the Media covered up the truth, and spun it.
The video really prooves why the driver did not see the shot, but even though reacted at the same time the bullet hited JFK.. That also prooves why i did make so much wound in the temporal area (if the shot came from a long distance, it would not be possible to see the would in the entrance bulllet area...just a as it happened with the first shot..anyone saw a big would in the back of president )
@dressblues7 Clearly you've never shot a high powered rifle before. the 6.5 mm round fired from the rifle would have almost no resistance entering the back of the head. but when the round exits the head, brain matter that is traveling BEHIND the bullet would force the head backwards.
the theory is compelling... but there is so much evidence just plainly destroyed that its hard to prove it without scientific evidence... and science has to take into account to prove the assassination. I used always wonder how is that someone from grossy knol would have made the fatal shot when the pictures show the head is swinging backwards rather than side ways towards mrs. kennedy???? the exit wound also shows the shot was from front! buts hard to believe nobody saw the man getting away!!!!
Ok, the limo driver shooting JFK has to be one of the top three most stupid assassination theories of all time. This is the kind of total crap where a reasonable person just shakes his head. Come on people, what's next ? Aliens on the grassy knoll !!
if u watch the assasination video doesnt it look like the driver shoots him he turns around after the first shot and you can kind of see his right arm lift up like he has a gun then when he turns around you see something shiny its just a theory though idk
@vretenartyler123 That shiny bit you see is the hair of the guy next to him. Its been ruled out and rather a ridiculous theory also, with everyone in the limo (incl. Jackie) and the crowd looking at the limo. Too many witnesses dont you agree......?
@RaymondL026 makes sense i guess but i dont think nobody will know soon i know some people know about it cause its top secret or something like that we were just learning about this in history then i saw armageddon and they asked about the assasination so i got curious
@vretenartyler123 I agree that we'll probably never know the thruth. I also believe there are people who know more about it. It's one big cover-up, if you ask me. You should be searching for the political agenda of JFK. Right before he was assassinated, on that agenda you can see who would benefit from his death.
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
How could the bullet have come from the ground when the tissue from Kennedy's head flies outward and upward. The only logical explanation is a shooter at a higher elevation than JFK. That rules out the sewer shooter and Greer. The two other theorized shooters are not discounted though.
maybe oswald was assigned to assassinate the president when he failed to do so, greer quickly finished the job in the panic. oswald was then murdered to cover it up
CONT... Oswald uncle was a bookie here for Carlos for years! Carlos has long been dead his nephew also named Carlos is a dear friend and a legit business man. I know what many do not you can be sure. Please don't believe your government they helped kill JFK! That's my proof and I assure you I'm not a nut! I'm a business owner and important man in my state contact me I will prove it!
So you are saying you believe the Warren Commission? I don't know exactly what happened but I do know what exactly didn't happen! The Warren commission version that what didn't happen my proof is physics and common sense! If I punch you in the face will your head snap back or go forward? No insults to you or bad language do I speak but give me a break. PS I live in New Orleans and I'm a family friend of the Marcellos. The assassins were flown in from France. Jack Ruby worked for Carlos F
@Nakor420ish Im with you brother.Im 53 now and it happened when I was 6 ..Ive been studying this like all my life and Im so angry now that my hands shake as I type this.I have never trusted my own gov..tell it like it is
I would just like to say that all 911, jfk, 2012, or any other conspiricy is retarded ip the ass. And anyone that tries to defend it is just as retarded as said conspiricys
@UnfoldedBread The fact you included "2012" with Kennedy and 9/11 shows that there is more chance that it is you that is retarded as opposed to people who believe in conspiracy theories.
As for the sewer shots, there is a basic problem here - a shot from that low would not get a clear shot of JFK, as he was slumped towards the centre of the rear seat. The side of the limo would be blocking the shot, IOW.
Finally, the notion of a rear head snap indicating a front shot ignores basic physics. A bullet weighing 1/3 of an ounce would push back JFK's head by all of two inches at most. There is a inch lurch forward at 313 and the head debris moves FORWARD, not backwards.
@1239jer Excellent points. I love how most CTers just ignore the facts that don't support their argument. Just like finding grassy knoll shooters in the Moorman photo. It's pure fantasy. If JFK was killed as the result of a massive conspiracy, the various theories would start to converge. So far, everyone seems to havt their own and no two are alike.
@399er If you think Oswald did it alone, you ALWAYS have the luxury of the facts working in your favor. CTers always have the facts working against them, and must use omissions, misinformation, and outright lies to explain their outlandish conclusions.
@MercyfulFate10 Well said !! I find it funny when you challenge a CTer in a debate to back up their claim and the usual tactic is to change the subject, or throw out a few insults.
AN interesting video, but with some rather gaping holes. First, relying on very grainy blow-ups of the Moorman photos isn't a route to find out the true nature of the head wounds - the actual autopsy photos and x-rays are the way to go. Unfortunately for this theory, those images are definitive - rear entry, right side blow-out. Even pro-conspiracy pathologist Cyril Wecht agrees.
@dressblues7 The driver shot him. I saw a video and you can see it clearly. I think that video it's part of the William Cooper's about his life and death.
He was shot from the back, you can see the blood and brain matter move forward as it should with a shot from the back of the head (there is no POSSIBLE way for it to do that with a frontal entry)... Then after JFK has been already shot and the physics of motion related to the shot have played out and stopped, he then moves himself to the back as his final conscious and or automatic movement in his life. The entire thing is horrible, but not a conspiracy at all.
@adm7007 Have you ever been to Dealey Plaza ? I have, and I've shot more rounds of ammo from various types of weapons than I can count. It's an easy shot from the 6th foor window. Not even a hundred yards.Plenty of people have bettered Oswalds time in various tests. This point of view that he couldn't do the shooting from there is just laughable, especially if you've been there.
@399er headshot came from the front and that trajectory is the most inline with the back right rear of the head blown out like Parkland doctors describe.
Keep believing your US government fairytale idiot, after all they told you the 100% truth and didn't lie right?
@adm7007 Where do you CTers get this Z-Film altered crap ? Have you ever seen a frame of 8mm film ? It is imposible to alter it in any way that is not blatently detectable. Particularly in the 1960s. For years conspiracy advocates used the Zapruder film as proof of a conspiracy, now the film itself is the conspiracy. What a load of rubish !!!
@chklitttle Duh, what does that prove in regards to the head shot ? Where is the evidence that JFK was shot from the front. He grabs his throat because his wind pipe is punctured, that does not prove he was hit from the front. I have 3 official investigations on my side as proof. What do you have ? I'd love to hear REAL evidence of another shooter, not just speculation.
@chklitttle One more thing, there are plenty of clear copies of the Zapruder film without the breaks. They are easy to find. I love to know whats so different about them. 3 or 4 frames missing is less than 1/2 of a second. I dought it shows anyone jumping out from behind the road sign and blasting the President !
If you watch closely he was shot in the throat from the front first. he grabs his collar then head goes forward ,jackie turns to him, then second shot hits him in the front of the head and his head flys backwards
@dressblues7 Bullets do NOT transfer their momentum to bodies. They pass through bodies. If the shot came from the front the head wound would be on the left side of JFKs head and Jackie would have been hit also. Simple physics.
@399er No this is not an absolute truth - bullets certainly CAN transfer the momentem they posses to a larger body. It is the resistance the bullet first encounters that determines whether the object struck will move as one or whether there is little resistance and the bullet just penetrates. A human skull is extremely hard - the hardest organic substance known - given the motion in the z-film the shot originated from the front and the bullet appears to have been a hollow point round.
@PabloPena108 The human skull is far from one of the hardest organic sustances known. Bullets do NOT transfer momentum. This is not Dirty Harry or Die Hard. If you've ever been in combat you'd know this. This is a very old and week argument. JFKs head goes forward first, then back. It's in the Zapruder film. And please don't tell me the Z-Film is a fake. Talk about a crazy theory.
@ScottishNonBeliever grassy knoll shot would leave an exit wound on the left side of the head and not the back right rear like Parkland hospital doctors and nurses observed and what this video shows.
A comedian, (still alive), with last name's initial "S", said many years ago on either the Mike Douglas or the show of the guy who later owned Resorts International, (forget his name at the moment...but he also had an afternoon TV talk-show), said, on the air -- that Congress wanted JFK killed....and that he Mafia did it.
He seems so sure about his theory, but how come JFK's head jerks forward at the moment of impact? That would mean that the very first premise, that the shot was fired from the front, is already questionable. Secondly, it was a limousine. For a rising shot, you'd have to clear the hood and pick a very low target that is the head of JFK. Even if it was from the side, that is still a very difficult shot. I'd like to see some more in depth analysis before I accept this even as a feasible proposal.
im callin bullshit on this dude
LiftAngry 3 days ago
imagine listening to this guys story high
LiftAngry 3 days ago
It makes perfect sense. "Hide in plain sight".
Sure, witness heard a shot from the grassy knoll. But, their brain is telling them not to look at the sewer area for a gunman because no ones their. Their brain then looks for the next viable option, behind the fence. The rifle report would also reverberate off the fencing, making it seem that the spot. There is a photo of smoke lingering in the air in this vicinity. Obviously the wind could carry the smoke several yards before the shot is taken.
kanukster 4 days ago
00:49 What's up with him crying? Seems like someone not too stable.
ADAMSIXTIES 1 week ago
@ADAMSIXTIES It seems like he just recently figured it out. We've known about the conspiracy since 1975 when Geraldo showed the Z film.
tregoj1 3 days ago
these videos that state they are PROOF in the title,make me just dismiss them quicker,pretty much like saying IM RIGHT YOUR WRONG even before youve watched it,damn shame people like this are so arrogant they cant provide you with evidence and let you make your own mind up,this kinda narrow minded reasoning is whats been holding there theories back for years,damn shame they will never realise this.
stellastey 1 week ago
i could find some truth in this ihave herd of people reporting that they herd a shot along the street and i have also read about people reporting a man with a rifle exiting the trinity river, also people smelling gun powder smoke
ColAvsfan04 1 week ago
I always get scared when I watch conspiracy videos that men in black suits are going to sneak up behind me and kill me...am I just paranoid?
SCATbus66 1 week ago
To the skeptics, Let's not throw out any of the options. Be a little open minded, some of this does make sense.
Acard89 1 week ago
Q, it's funny when you look at how many person's duck or move away due to shot's fired, or if a surpressor was used, then the acustic's would not have recorded the sound's at least 4 shot's no matter how far the bike was, in the Z film including Zapurder, they just stand there, yet a shot comes from his Right and about 20 / 30 yards to his right, the Z film has been changed full stop.
7071t6 1 week ago
What babble. Not a shred of science or hard evidence in the whole video. What is hard to accept, it seems, is that a pathetic white dude with identity problems and a lust for power shot Kennedy. I know it is not romantic and perhaps disappointing to deal with the bland truth. But, it is those seeking aggrandizement that kill or try to kill our Presidents. Nothing else to see here folks, you can move on now.
sanfrancisco89 1 week ago
@sanfrancisco89 The black and white pre-autopsy photo of Kennedy on his back clearly shows a bullet hole high on his forehead. An entrance wound which blew out the back of his head. It had to be more frontal than to the right to not blow out the left back of the head. In the Z film one can clearly see pieces of his head fly upward which would fit a sewer shot. He seems to be lifted upwards.
tregoj1 3 days ago
@sanfrancisco89 that pretty much sums it up
LiftAngry 3 days ago
Isn't it rumored that someone heard a bang along the streets?
nihploduoykuf 2 weeks ago
@nihploduoykuf I read somewhere that some witnesses reported that the last shot,(headshot) echoed as if fired from a sewer and some in the motorcade reported smelling gunpowder.
adm7007 2 weeks ago
It's hard to know which researcher is correct. Some have said it came from the Grassy Knoll, some have said it came from the Triple Underpass, and this man says it came from the sewer. Obviously we know it didn't come from the Book Depository by Oswald, but it may be some years before we have the technology to get a consensus on this. Of course, shots may have come from multiple locations like many witnesses and others have said in the past.
TheLensSolution 3 weeks ago
Who shot Kennedy? The big question, debates about whether it was Oswald, Johnson or the Federal Reserve, who knows, honestly!! In my opinion I think he was shot so he'd remain quiet and not progress with plans he had in store for us back in the 60's.. As far government goes, because I see this topic a lot in the comments, the government does what it is told to do, plain and simple, not their fault we pay taxes and go to war.. I say this because WAR brings revenue although we spend plenty oursel
dneeeze23 3 weeks ago
@dneeeze23 The fatal head shot that killed JFK came from the storm drain, the shooter was Johnny Roselli a mob hitman in cahoots with the C.I.A.
irishhellsangel 3 weeks ago
I'd like for someone who isn't just another common, everyday smart ass to give their opinion on the "Stickman" that we see also, when we are supposed to be th
MissingForida 1 month ago
Okay, BlueWolfe38, anyone who disagrees with you is in need of psychological help. Why would they subject themselves to the rude crude type of criticism that isn't even constructive that you dish out? I am so glad I have never been married to you. How many brownie points do you think you've won today with your government. You mistakingly think they care. They don't. They confiscated everybody's camera because we weren't like Russia?!
MissingForida 1 month ago
@MissingForida whhhhahahahahaaaat?!?
soniclyartistic 1 month ago
This poor old fool was simply another idiot exploited by Conspiracy Theorists. He quite obviously was in need of psychological help. In over 48 years not one arrest of an individual trigger, not one eyewitness, not one spent shell, not one bullet or bullet fragment entered into evidence using ballistic science. All medical evidence, autopsy evidence, photographic and film evidence supporting and affirming the finding of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated John F. Kennedy.
BlueWolfe38 1 month ago
@BlueWolfe38 Why would his head and body lurch in different directions from the shots? How did one man do something that experts say is impossible?
DrunkWerewolf 2 weeks ago
Oswald did not shoot kennedy. He was shot one time by a mafia hitman for creating the u.s. note and trying to abolish the federal reserve.
sparkyscooter 1 month ago
JFK was shot twice, so here's a theory: Oswald was in the School Book Depository, and the other man was in the storm drain, after Oswald shot JFK in the neck, the other man shot JFK in the head, and they were working together? what about that?
musicfreak2112 1 month ago
*END OF STORY!*
maldonado16839 1 month ago
GOD! This is NOT a freaking conspiracy! Oswald killed him! Only because his parents and brothers never payed attention to him. He went to the army. His shooting card Thingy was, ASSAULT: 98/100, SNIPER: 97/100. He then went to Russia to serve as a Soviet. He went back to America to see if he had any media there, but nope. Unfortunately, he didn't like JFK and his campaign promises. So therefore Oswald sniped him. Later on, HE then he was shot by a strip club owner named ' Jack Ruby ' END OF STO
maldonado16839 1 month ago
Youve all got it wrong.It was Colonel Mustard in the Study with an iron bar
idiotbaiter 1 month ago
This is a bunch of crap. Anyone who buys this knows nothing about ballistics. If you buy this, I got a bridge for you too.
splitbacks 1 month ago
@splitbacks and you know what about ballistics with your shiny new Google Ballistic license?
jaroncreed 1 month ago
"entered rt. temple." - reporter Seth Kantor's notes
jfkcia 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is simple to prove the conspiracy.Between the second and third shots, LHO had to reload the weapon, find the head of JFK and shoot again, the time marked on the video zapruther between the second and third shots are 4 seconds in the video is a tangible proof. This maneuver like hitting the lottery. It is impossible for a boy of 24 years can do it. He missed the first shot to 20 feet without having to maneuver.
joaoisobr 2 months ago
It is simple to prove the conspiracy.Between the second and third shots, LHO had to reload the weapon, find the head of JFK and shoot again, the time marked on the video zapruther between the second and third shots are 4 seconds in the video is a tangible proof. This maneuver like hitting the lottery. It is impossible for a boy of 24 years can do it. He missed the first shot to 20 feet without having to maneuver. Moving target changes everything. for the caseof JFK this video above is notvalid.
joaoisobr 2 months ago
Even James Files deliberately pointed at the drain and said that another shoot team was in there.
TheShadowFX 2 months ago
He took a blurry movie and fucked it up beyond belief.
MrGuitartramp 2 months ago 2
This video solves a mystery that begins when one observes the action of JFK's head as he is struck!!!
EthanA1122 2 months ago
Google search,
"zapruder film hoax" and read it.
You cannot rely on the Zapruder film as being 100% accurate.
No way!
adm7007 2 months ago
Ironically, Gaddafi was found in a sewer drain.
mpjgbx 2 months ago
this might explain why the umbrella man pointed his umbrella up high the guy in the drain would probably see and at the ready and the last shots heard did sound different,who knows?
gentle7ways7 3 months ago
sounds totally feasible. :)
e77toe77 3 months ago
There was a shooter in the car. It's the only thing that adds up. It's how Kennedy and Connolly were shot and it's ow the shooter changed his angle and shot Kennedy in the head.
amerikaiscommunist 3 months ago
No NO NO. everyone knows when a bullet enters its a small hole, when it leaves ITS A BIG HOLE. JFK was shot by LHO, he was a trained assassin, he was trained by the U.S. Marines special forces. END OF STORY.
redcormorant 3 months ago
@redcormorant
Definitely, I don't know where the idea that Oswald was a bad shooter came from. He was good shot, not an expert but a good shot , his record proves it. And the JFK shooting did not require to be an expert at all. This case is really simple , Oswald did it .
captainkavern 3 months ago
@redcormorant Oswald was only part of it,END OF STORY
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
I have solved the Kennedy assassination. I told an FBI agent I concluded he was shot from the trunk.. He said a Mossad agent was in the trunk. Many people knew he was going to be shot, but not many knew there was a shooter in the trunk. The fact Kennedy and Connolly was shot at the same time and the fact that the head shot on frame 313 of the clear videos the bullet exits going towards front of car at ten degrees. No other angle fits the bullet exit. Other shooters were to frame Oswald.
amerikaiscommunist 3 months ago
damn i i did a project on this in school and i had photos and try to computerise everything even the sewer but i never thought it would be from the sewer thats very good like i said i only did projects and computerised it but never went there to see HOW and WHERE....JFK just wanted to protect everyone thats all just he forgot to protect himself
al3xxiong202 4 months ago
I've been viewing the films, the documentaries, the theories. The only thing I know for sure is the extremely erie feeling I get just before JFK gets shot in the head. I realize this does'nt mean alot in terms of determining the truth - is it my own paranoia I feel about my own life that I'm projecting into the JFK shooting?
bellavia5 4 months ago
What the fuck is that video? The has the best technology??? are you kidding me? The pixels of his computers are so big! And by the way you don't need those ridiculously low tech camera he has to see the zapruder film: The right part of the president head blows up. That mean it's an axit wound. THE is NO exit wound at the back of the head , you clearly see it on the zapruder film and the muchmore film or nix film. Therefore he was hit from the back. No wonder this guy was dismissed by the medias
captainkavern 4 months ago
@captainkavern if oswald shot the president from the rear of his head it would have taken half his face off but it didn't
gentle7ways7 3 months ago
@gentle7ways7
This would have been true if JFK was facing straight in front of him but
At the time of the head shot; JFK had his head turned to his left (45 degres) toward Jackie.
So it is completely logical that a bullet from the rear exit the right of his head.
captainkavern 3 months ago
@captainkavern his head was indeed turned to to the left and downwards so in relation to where Oswald supposedly fired from it would have exited his right orbital eye socket or there abouts..instead the wound explodes in the right frontal region and his head goes back and left, as if he was shot from the right from the front, part of his brain and bone matter flew past and in front of people who saw it happen on the cars left and bullets trajectory, the direction just doesn't fit a rear shot
gentle7ways7 3 months ago
@gentle7ways7
A shot from the grassy knoll would have blown the right side of his head. A shot from the front is the most unlikely (2 men seating in front of him) . A precise look a tthe zapruder film shows that his head moves foreward and then he goes back and to the left (a muscular reflex due to the shot in the brain). plus, the brain debris go clearly forward. All of this is not obvious but . A shot from the book depository is the most likely...
captainkavern 3 months ago
@captainkavern glad you are in agreement with the bullet hitting his right side of his head,i didn't say straight in front of him,however at an angle from the right front is more likely,if you look at the shots that were fired in all it shows that there must have been more gunman involved,remember Oswald supposedly missed the first shot which means with the two remaining bullets it is impossible for him to have nicked the guy under the triple bypass,hit kennedy three times , + connally +car
gentle7ways7 3 months ago
@gentle7ways7
Oops!! I made a mistake I have trouble with my right and my left! No a shot from the grassy knoll would have blown the left part of his head! All the early reports of the shooting mention 3 shots. As far as I know (regarding the credible testimonies and the zapruder film) kennedy is hit at the same time as connally, by the same bullet. And then kennedy is hit in the head, fragment of that shot created the crack in the winshield, (not a bullet hole). And the first shot missed
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern it seems the credible testimonies were ignored, those two bullets did alot of damage don't you think?
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
I call "credible" every testimony wich can be verify with hard evidence. wether it is the favor of a conspiracy or not. The problem is no credible testimony (only speculations) has been made in favor of the conspiration...
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern i disagree ,if eye witness testimony (the people who were there) describe shots and seeing things that put a second gunman into the frame including Craigs account along with a mauser rifle and many other things that break the law in terms of Oswalds defence legal matters excluding a lawyer present when questioned does need scrutiny just like why the WC suppressed much data that was significant including a hit on jfk in chigago which was very important to the dallas scenario
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
Répondre à cette vidéo...
the single bullet theory is quite simple in fact. one bullet fired by a rifle from a distance of around 70 yards goes through the bodies of two men sitting one in front of the other. in a straight line. Nothing magical with that! It is logical. the conspiracy theory misplace connaly at the time the bullet strikes he is turned to is right and is sitting lower than JFK and more in the center of the car. It's clearly visible on the zapruderfilm.
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern in fact Kennedy was struck in the throat from the front but was hit in the back also in my opinion,his body movement would indicate the hits and directions,also how do you explain the pristine bullet that went through the dense bone matter doing near impossible twists and turns,the zapruda film was edited and altered once the FBI and investigation on it was done,the frames in question are shortened therefore this explains the WC version of events,two bullets couldn't do all that
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
If he was struck in the throat from the front , where is that bullet? And why that bullet did not came out of the other side of the throat? At the time he was hit in the throat he was not visible from the grassy knoll. The bullet that hit connaly did not zig zag and turn!!! connaly was turned to his right when the single bullet hit that 's why the angle of entry is not the same as the one as kennedy. ! You are repeating one of the many mistakes in the movie JFK.
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern the bullet just kind of disapeared i reckon maybe like the mysterious wound on the presidents back and stranger still the tiny hole in his throat before and gaping wound (20 times larger) after ? pristine bullet or near pristine bullet it seems strange to me,connally changed this version in several interviews,you can clearly see him react after kennedy was struck by about 2 seconds the film shows clearly a delay,the zappruda film was edited by the investigators now owned by gov
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
the wound in the back of the president did not disapear, it is easily vivible on tne autopsy photos, and the jacket and shirt photos. The wound in the neck has been made larger by the tracheotomy . it is a very known fact and even the conspiracy buffs don't discuss that fact. The "single" bullet was not pristine. It was flatenned but not highky dammaged because it encountered only one bone (Connaly's wrist)
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern the tracheotomy was rejected as the cause of the open wound simply because the tube was the same as the bullet entrance wound it was seen by the docotors and surgeons who tried to revive the president and they clearly stated it was never opened up more than the hole they saw,when seen later by observation they stated it was opened up not by them,altered,these are the guys who were there and saw the wounds why not believe that,earl warren wasn't present in the surgery right?
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
That point irrelevent. We all know there was a small wound first . Even the Warren Comission agrees. What happened to that wound after doesn't matter. The doctors in parkland couldn't say if it was an entry or an exit wound (they were not perfoming an autopsy, they were trying to save his life). Kennedy Laid on his back and was never turned in parkland. (Have you read the testimonies of the doctors? I guess the answer is no)
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern "we all know there was a small wound first"
what? so you and the warren commission agree that the wound in the front was a tiny bullet hole enough for a pinky ? yes? that would indicate an entrance wound right! yup they tried to save his life alright not sure what the difference in observation makes tho?
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
Répondre à cette vidéo...
The alterations on the zapruderfim are complete (science) fiction!!!! NOBODY ever proved it. Because it is real! and by the way Zapruder himself answer an interview before his film was processed, and he describes exactely what is on the film
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern the u.s goverment payed over 16 million dollars for this film to zapruder family which is the most highest payout fro a historic event ever but more interestingly why so much and why do they want it so much? the film is definitely altered in frames at the vital shots just like other footage from other films from other users most were confiscated and never saw the light of day again? but the original was duplicated so it can be compared to the edited piece
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7 THis is completely false. Zapruder made 3 copy of the film he gave 2 to the secret service .
And he sold the rights of the film (50 000 dollars) to time life. He gave 25 000 to Tippit's wife. Why did the government want the film so much? Well , guess what, someone had filmed the murder , maybe they're interested!!!! That film is not altered. You just heard stories that it was . But is was not. And any serious and sane person would agree with me...
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern yes he did but the goverment paid out 16 million dollars later
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
Répondre à cette vidéo...
The single bullet was not pristine. (even Oliver Stone doesn't say that!) It was not very damaged yes but not pristine. the reason is that bullet hit almost no bones when passing through Kennedy and Connaly. One connaly's rib was hit and his wrist but at that time the bullet had slowed down.
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern most bullets are and including the italian rifle it supposedly came from bust up from impact and is very rarely retrieved if found even,so this would be remarkably rare,just like oswalds remarkable two shots,like i said before the bullet was most likely from another stretcher in the hospital or planted,and just by coincidence jack ruby was seen at the hospital also?hanging around..doesn't sound impulsive behaviour to me
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
All the bullet or the fragment retrieved were linked to Oswald carchano. oswald was a sharp shooter better than the average Marine shooting at 200 yards. Kennedy was at 88 yards with an angle almost not changing . Piece of cake!!! Ruby was arranging an add for his club at the dallas morning news at the time of the shooting. He was seen by many peoples. His presence in parkland is completely fictional.
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern if the shot was so easy to make with a bolt action the time frames he made , why didn't FBI sharp shooters pull off the shots Oswald supposedly made in the same way,they didn't get close to oswalds shots? they are above him in ranking
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
If the zapruder film is a fake or altered. You have to explain why did Garrison and oliver stone said that film was hidden from the public because it revealed JFK was shot from the front! Why did the government just destroyed it? No they altered it with a technology that still doesn't exist...Impressive. The conspiracy buff are funny when an evidence prove them wrong, they say it's a fake (oswald's backyard photos , the autopsy photo's) com'on!!!
captainkavern 2 months ago
Répondre à cette vidéo...
Because if the bullet which hit JFK is not the one which hit connaly you have to explain where does the bullet the hit connally in the back comes from... were are those bullets? they should be somwhere in the limousine or should have hit other passenger. And please don't mention the crack in the windshield which is not a bullet hole ! But probably made by a fragment. Those bullet s where are they? Gone? those bullets are magic! not the single bullet.
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern i think there were three teams in plaza that day, two buildings in the rear and a team at the front,i think Oswald was a fall guy but was involved IMO
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
If you were a good investigator, you would know that was is important is not what you think, it his what you have, the evidence. there is no evidence of three shooting team on dealey plaza. Only speculation made by Oliver stone in his very inacurate movie JFK....
captainkavern 2 months ago
@gentle7ways7
So if I get you, when you have 80% of the witnesses in dealey plaza who said they heard 2 or 3 shots, you are gonna ignore them totally and just listen to the rest who said they heard more. Some people saw Oswald withdraw his gun. at the time of the shooting. NO ONE saw anyone fire from the grassy knoll in 1963. (jean hill, lee bowers etc...) people started to claim they saw something in 1978 only...is that credible? com'on!!!
captainkavern 2 months ago
@captainkavern idk about who or what percentages saw or heard 2 or 3 shots but i would guess that the majority said it came from the TBSD because at least 1 shot came from there and plus there were more people around that building than the grassy knoll spot,one witness saw a pipe or gun barrel from the TSBD however nobody saw Oswald holding a gun,well craig was there in 1963 he saw things that would go against the WC he is credible more so than other eyewitness
gentle7ways7 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@captainkavern but WC knew this and created there own version to coincide with LBJ requests most likely, and we have frames of the zapruda film edited down and the one bullet hitting kennedy and connally they suppress info pertaining the damage on the car rear and window plus the damage caused by the drain where buddy walters tried to investigate but coincidences he got his head blown off?
gentle7ways7 3 months ago
This Evil LBJ statement WE believe refers to the murder of JFK
"It is the Melancholy law of human societies to be compeled sometimes to chose a great evil in order to ward off a greater evil"
YOU want to see a guilty MAN? check this out , = LBJ coments on JFK assasination 1969.wmv
LBJ Evil joke about JFK
"I told? him that morning at breakfast...Son, I'm afraid this just ant' your day. Your going to the morgue and I'm going back to the White House"
cruisersism 4 months ago
@cruisersism but WC knew this and created there own version to coincide with LBJ requests most likely, and we have frames of the zapruda film edited down and the one bullet hitting kennedy and connally they suppress info pertaining the damage on the car rear and window plus the damage caused by the drain where buddy walters tried to investigate but coincidences he got his head blown off?
gentle7ways7 3 months ago
This Evil LBJ statement WE believe refers to the murder of JFK
"It is the Melancholy law of human societies to be compeled sometimes to chose a great evil in order to ward off a greater evil"
YOU want to see a guilty MAN? check this out , = LBJ coments on JFK assasination 1969.wmv
LBJ Evil joke about JFK
"I told? him that morning at breakfast...Son, I'm afraid this just ant' your day. Your going to the morgue and I'm going back to the White House"
cruisersism 4 months ago
Wake up America, Youre getting it in the ass everyday, Unite and Take over
smith077906 4 months ago
This is actually really credible.
LadyHarrington2k 4 months ago
I hope the sick bastards that did this suffer the same horrific fate. JFK did not deserve this. Very few people deserve something like this. There are so many explanations and they all seem feasible, but I don't have any clear opinion. Horrible.
anthonygareth 4 months ago
@Stan021 You are one of the only people other than myself that mentions that ex order most people don't realize JFK stripped the power from big banks with this order and it is still a valid order to this day. There was no national debt in 1963. When they killed JFK it was the beginning of our end. Very good point maybe one day people will wake the fuck up!!!
pearlofprice 4 months ago
I thought this before I watched this ffs!!! Obviously not all the tech stuff (that's not what I do),but the fact that his wife wasn't also killed,meant the shot had to have come from the front,not behind,& either at the Presidents level,or below...That is just plain common sense! If it had come from behind and/or above,or the side for that matter,the bullet would have went through his head & also hit her...
NEVER TRUST ANY GOVERNMENT!
QUESTION EVERYTHING & DON'T BELIEVE WHAT YOU ARE TOLD TO!
deadgirl82 5 months ago
HELP, Anyone know what documentary this came from? Thanks.
48alfaone 5 months ago
@48alfaone It came from a documentary called " I made all this shit up for some easy money".
superchitownhustler 5 months ago
@superchitownhustler Hahaha, good point!
48alfaone 5 months ago
nope, this theory has been debunked a long time ago.
enanobx 5 months ago
If someone wanted to kill the presient of the United States they would pick a better spot then a sewer i agree with GlennWisonMusic
curtisjones400 5 months ago
@curtisjones400 YOU guys know shit about covert ops the sewer is Exactly where you would want to be....close proximity....concealment from the public......route of escape.......after this day all sewers were sealed for a motorcade...i wonder why....daaaaaaaaaaa the guy speaking in the video is exactly right.
renduke 5 months ago 7
@curtisjones400 Of all the dum things I've read on youtube this has to be the best, I'm guessing you don't get out very often
davmeva 5 months ago
@davmeva "This theory was debunked a long time ago
curtisjones400 5 months ago
This guy knows nothing about forensics or ballistics. Bullshit crackpot theory.
sirkowski 5 months ago
this man is absolutely right. The man with a rifle killed president of USA Mr Kennedy. Mr Kennedy had to die because of his Ex Order 11110......
stan021 5 months ago
it makes sense because the angle of wich his head is hit from the side, it's almost in an upward push if you will, like head was doing a barrel roll towards his wife beside him.. if te shot had been at ground level or higher, he would would have spun his head, or the bullet wo gone through and hit his wife.
06livefast 5 months ago 2
The placement of kennedys head at the time of the fatal shot is leaning forward and looking down. This makes it clear why the autopsy couldnt show the dislodged skull at the back of his head. It would imply a shot from below and up through the skull. If Oswald was the patsy the wound had to confirm a shot from above not below. Looking at the zapruder film you only have to trust your eyes. The fact that mainstream media consistently pushes the shot from behind speaks volumes!
outofslumber 5 months ago
It makes sense, I once said it looked as if the shot was coming upward.
We will never really know.
Snowman374th 5 months ago
At 6:15 you can see the bullet as it came out, Look to the left of JFK.
That was a good camera.
Snowman374th 5 months ago
Interesting, but I have a DVD documentary inwhich the curator of the JFK museum in the book depository poh-poohs this very theory and demonstrates that the angles jus cannot work. Insidentally, he also claims that the big white X in the road is in the wrong position
EVITANDY 6 months ago
I'm not convinced on the sewer theory - it's not a good angle, and you would literally have one chance to get the shot right assuming you could even see him behind Connolly.
GlennWilsonMusic 6 months ago
CBS - ran a poll in 1998 asking Americans if they believed the official story of JFK's assassination; 90% did not.
On a related note - 100% of the media believes the official story.
Some of Kennedy's murderers, before and after the fact are still alive.
Two people that should be questioned about this - G. H. W. Bush & Arlene Specter.
Bush was 39 that day and can't remember where he was; FBI memos suggest otherwise.
Specter - father of the magic bullet "theory".
SuspiciousPatriot 6 months ago
@SuspiciousPatriot Good point, and one that deserves more discussion. Why are the views of the mainstream media so out of whack with those of the public? Since the media reflects society and is composed of people, it normally has views that are proportionate to those of the public. Is it because the media is smarter & more knowledgable on this issue? No. Many of them weren't even there and no very little about it. They are being told they must support the government line.
TheLensSolution 3 weeks ago
I bet the guy driving kennedy´s car was hired...hired to reach the "X",the point where he would be aimed and a guy shot from the drain the second shot
Maybe the guy to shoot was the first,from the first shot,but he was far,nervous,it was a bad shot,so they used their B Plan,the drain guy...they would not shot from several places to give reason for conspiracies investigations,it was a mistake from the firt CIA shooter
GabrielDhalaman2 6 months ago
lol someone should have told this guy not to waste his time. satan worshipers ahoy, freemasons, jesuit order, nights of malta. All the satan worshiping loony toons covered their tracks well
21Bouncer 6 months ago
Well, Mr. Wilson, bring your evidence to me. I'll put you and it on TV, Comcast cable in Santa Barbara County and on my YT channel. I have known since I read the faked up WARREN Report, that the Media covered up the truth, and spun it.
williamwagener 6 months ago 10
seems legit
CountBeany 6 months ago
The video really prooves why the driver did not see the shot, but even though reacted at the same time the bullet hited JFK.. That also prooves why i did make so much wound in the temporal area (if the shot came from a long distance, it would not be possible to see the would in the entrance bulllet area...just a as it happened with the first shot..anyone saw a big would in the back of president )
Embraer091 6 months ago
@dressblues7 Clearly you've never shot a high powered rifle before. the 6.5 mm round fired from the rifle would have almost no resistance entering the back of the head. but when the round exits the head, brain matter that is traveling BEHIND the bullet would force the head backwards.
drcanderson18 6 months ago
the theory is compelling... but there is so much evidence just plainly destroyed that its hard to prove it without scientific evidence... and science has to take into account to prove the assassination. I used always wonder how is that someone from grossy knol would have made the fatal shot when the pictures show the head is swinging backwards rather than side ways towards mrs. kennedy???? the exit wound also shows the shot was from front! buts hard to believe nobody saw the man getting away!!!!
tigersoup 6 months ago
@tigersoup
In fact the CIA used stealth technology. The CIA agent who shot the bullet had the magic hat !
Noone could have seen him. He just went away. he was invincible.
Steveelito 5 months ago
Ok, the limo driver shooting JFK has to be one of the top three most stupid assassination theories of all time. This is the kind of total crap where a reasonable person just shakes his head. Come on people, what's next ? Aliens on the grassy knoll !!
399er 6 months ago
Comment removed
399er 6 months ago
if u watch the assasination video doesnt it look like the driver shoots him he turns around after the first shot and you can kind of see his right arm lift up like he has a gun then when he turns around you see something shiny its just a theory though idk
vretenartyler123 6 months ago
@vretenartyler123 That shiny bit you see is the hair of the guy next to him. Its been ruled out and rather a ridiculous theory also, with everyone in the limo (incl. Jackie) and the crowd looking at the limo. Too many witnesses dont you agree......?
RaymondL026 4 months ago
@RaymondL026 makes sense i guess but i dont think nobody will know soon i know some people know about it cause its top secret or something like that we were just learning about this in history then i saw armageddon and they asked about the assasination so i got curious
vretenartyler123 4 months ago
@vretenartyler123 I agree that we'll probably never know the thruth. I also believe there are people who know more about it. It's one big cover-up, if you ask me. You should be searching for the political agenda of JFK. Right before he was assassinated, on that agenda you can see who would benefit from his death.
RaymondL026 4 months ago
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
How could the bullet have come from the ground when the tissue from Kennedy's head flies outward and upward. The only logical explanation is a shooter at a higher elevation than JFK. That rules out the sewer shooter and Greer. The two other theorized shooters are not discounted though.
XxSPM3xX 6 months ago
maybe oswald was assigned to assassinate the president when he failed to do so, greer quickly finished the job in the panic. oswald was then murdered to cover it up
harropizza 6 months ago
@dressblues7 what does that mean?
CodMaster601 6 months ago
The Driver William Greer Killed Kennedy At point blank range stop the lying.
dukeof1999 6 months ago
@dressblues7 they seem to choose that when confronted with the truth they have all been duped no-one likes to here that!
geovs20 6 months ago
@399er
CONT... Oswald uncle was a bookie here for Carlos for years! Carlos has long been dead his nephew also named Carlos is a dear friend and a legit business man. I know what many do not you can be sure. Please don't believe your government they helped kill JFK! That's my proof and I assure you I'm not a nut! I'm a business owner and important man in my state contact me I will prove it!
pearlofprice 6 months ago
@pearlofprice If you are refering to Charles "Dutz" Moret, I'm familiar with his story.
399er 6 months ago
@399er
So you are saying you believe the Warren Commission? I don't know exactly what happened but I do know what exactly didn't happen! The Warren commission version that what didn't happen my proof is physics and common sense! If I punch you in the face will your head snap back or go forward? No insults to you or bad language do I speak but give me a break. PS I live in New Orleans and I'm a family friend of the Marcellos. The assassins were flown in from France. Jack Ruby worked for Carlos F
pearlofprice 6 months ago
God dammit, it makes me so mad!
Nakor420ish 7 months ago
@Nakor420ish Im with you brother.Im 53 now and it happened when I was 6 ..Ive been studying this like all my life and Im so angry now that my hands shake as I type this.I have never trusted my own gov..tell it like it is
jimmyofaden 6 months ago
This makes more sense than the Warren Commission!
adm7007 7 months ago 19
This has been flagged as spam show
@adm7007 The Warren Commission Report is pure fiction!
bwild61 6 months ago
I would just like to say that all 911, jfk, 2012, or any other conspiricy is retarded ip the ass. And anyone that tries to defend it is just as retarded as said conspiricys
UnfoldedBread 7 months ago
@UnfoldedBread The fact you included "2012" with Kennedy and 9/11 shows that there is more chance that it is you that is retarded as opposed to people who believe in conspiracy theories.
SteRDLK 6 months ago
As for the sewer shots, there is a basic problem here - a shot from that low would not get a clear shot of JFK, as he was slumped towards the centre of the rear seat. The side of the limo would be blocking the shot, IOW.
Finally, the notion of a rear head snap indicating a front shot ignores basic physics. A bullet weighing 1/3 of an ounce would push back JFK's head by all of two inches at most. There is a inch lurch forward at 313 and the head debris moves FORWARD, not backwards.
1239jer 7 months ago
@1239jer Excellent points. I love how most CTers just ignore the facts that don't support their argument. Just like finding grassy knoll shooters in the Moorman photo. It's pure fantasy. If JFK was killed as the result of a massive conspiracy, the various theories would start to converge. So far, everyone seems to havt their own and no two are alike.
399er 7 months ago
@399er If you think Oswald did it alone, you ALWAYS have the luxury of the facts working in your favor. CTers always have the facts working against them, and must use omissions, misinformation, and outright lies to explain their outlandish conclusions.
MercyfulFate10 7 months ago
@MercyfulFate10 Well said !! I find it funny when you challenge a CTer in a debate to back up their claim and the usual tactic is to change the subject, or throw out a few insults.
399er 7 months ago
AN interesting video, but with some rather gaping holes. First, relying on very grainy blow-ups of the Moorman photos isn't a route to find out the true nature of the head wounds - the actual autopsy photos and x-rays are the way to go. Unfortunately for this theory, those images are definitive - rear entry, right side blow-out. Even pro-conspiracy pathologist Cyril Wecht agrees.
1239jer 7 months ago
@dressblues7 The driver shot him. I saw a video and you can see it clearly. I think that video it's part of the William Cooper's about his life and death.
katrinadomi 7 months ago
@dressblues7
yea but thats just how he fell, the bullet wound was in the back of the head
9/11 was definatly an inside job, im not too sure about jfk tho
yimnerr 7 months ago
What happened here in my opinion:
He was shot from the back, you can see the blood and brain matter move forward as it should with a shot from the back of the head (there is no POSSIBLE way for it to do that with a frontal entry)... Then after JFK has been already shot and the physics of motion related to the shot have played out and stopped, he then moves himself to the back as his final conscious and or automatic movement in his life. The entire thing is horrible, but not a conspiracy at all.
CactusWolf 7 months ago
@CactusWolf that Z film is altered to show a big frontal mess of a head wound yet none of the Parkland Dr,s,nurses report seeing such a thing.
They all say the back right rear of the head was blown out and they saw him first before the coverup came about.
I have no faith in the Zapruder film as being 100% accurate.
adm7007 7 months ago
@adm7007
And why do you suppose there is a cover up? If there is some secret government cover up, what would be the reason?
CactusWolf 7 months ago
@CactusWolf to hide government involvement in the assassination,namely CIA.
No way one gunman firing from the rear with a pos rifle pulled this off.
adm7007 7 months ago
@adm7007 Have you ever been to Dealey Plaza ? I have, and I've shot more rounds of ammo from various types of weapons than I can count. It's an easy shot from the 6th foor window. Not even a hundred yards.Plenty of people have bettered Oswalds time in various tests. This point of view that he couldn't do the shooting from there is just laughable, especially if you've been there.
399er 7 months ago
@399er do you believe the single bullet theory to be 100% true,lol.
adm7007 7 months ago
@adm7007 Do you actualy believe JFK was shot from the storm drain ? LOL !
399er 7 months ago
@399er headshot came from the front and that trajectory is the most inline with the back right rear of the head blown out like Parkland doctors describe.
Keep believing your US government fairytale idiot, after all they told you the 100% truth and didn't lie right?
adm7007 7 months ago
@adm7007 Keep beleiving your your science fiction sewer drain pablum. The entertainment factor is a laugh a minute. LOL, LOL, LOL !!
399er 7 months ago
@adm7007 Where do you CTers get this Z-Film altered crap ? Have you ever seen a frame of 8mm film ? It is imposible to alter it in any way that is not blatently detectable. Particularly in the 1960s. For years conspiracy advocates used the Zapruder film as proof of a conspiracy, now the film itself is the conspiracy. What a load of rubish !!!
399er 7 months ago
Back and to the left.
tig3rnamja 7 months ago
the zapruder film was cut and chopped open your eyes wake up
chklitttle 7 months ago
@chklitttle Duh, what does that prove in regards to the head shot ? Where is the evidence that JFK was shot from the front. He grabs his throat because his wind pipe is punctured, that does not prove he was hit from the front. I have 3 official investigations on my side as proof. What do you have ? I'd love to hear REAL evidence of another shooter, not just speculation.
399er 7 months ago
@chklitttle One more thing, there are plenty of clear copies of the Zapruder film without the breaks. They are easy to find. I love to know whats so different about them. 3 or 4 frames missing is less than 1/2 of a second. I dought it shows anyone jumping out from behind the road sign and blasting the President !
399er 7 months ago
If you watch closely he was shot in the throat from the front first. he grabs his collar then head goes forward ,jackie turns to him, then second shot hits him in the front of the head and his head flys backwards
chklitttle 7 months ago
@dressblues7 Bullets do NOT transfer their momentum to bodies. They pass through bodies. If the shot came from the front the head wound would be on the left side of JFKs head and Jackie would have been hit also. Simple physics.
399er 7 months ago
@399er No this is not an absolute truth - bullets certainly CAN transfer the momentem they posses to a larger body. It is the resistance the bullet first encounters that determines whether the object struck will move as one or whether there is little resistance and the bullet just penetrates. A human skull is extremely hard - the hardest organic substance known - given the motion in the z-film the shot originated from the front and the bullet appears to have been a hollow point round.
PabloPena108 7 months ago
@PabloPena108 The human skull is far from one of the hardest organic sustances known. Bullets do NOT transfer momentum. This is not Dirty Harry or Die Hard. If you've ever been in combat you'd know this. This is a very old and week argument. JFKs head goes forward first, then back. It's in the Zapruder film. And please don't tell me the Z-Film is a fake. Talk about a crazy theory.
399er 7 months ago
This guy needs to hire someone to explain his concepts, cause he sure can't!
MrMaypole14 7 months ago
@ScottishNonBeliever grassy knoll shot would leave an exit wound on the left side of the head and not the back right rear like Parkland hospital doctors and nurses observed and what this video shows.
adm7007 7 months ago
A comedian, (still alive), with last name's initial "S", said many years ago on either the Mike Douglas or the show of the guy who later owned Resorts International, (forget his name at the moment...but he also had an afternoon TV talk-show), said, on the air -- that Congress wanted JFK killed....and that he Mafia did it.
UTAOUB 7 months ago
@just0passing0thru most shows except this one you see on TV is going to say a sewer shot was impossible.
Mobster Johnny Roselli claimed to be the storm drain shooter who blew off JFK's head.
Now why would someone make such a claim and pick that particular location for a shot?
Really makes me wonder and there is a sewer there.
After this assassination all sewers were covered over in future motorcades.
adm7007 7 months ago
@just0passing0thru
There was no exit wound on the left side of the head.
All the Parkland Dr's,nurses,people at the autopsy say the back right rear of the head was blown out.
These people saw JFK first,before the US government covered it up with a bullshit story.
This is most in line with a shot from that sewer.
You have probably seen/heard too many grassy knoll theories.A knoll shot would exit on the left side of the head and not the back right rear.
adm7007 7 months ago
@just0passing0thru When?
Today or in Nov 1963 when the opening was larger?
Early researchers like Penn Jones and John Judge who actually entered that sewer back then said the opening was more than ample for the headshot.
adm7007 7 months ago
SNIFF ...SNIFF...SNIFF FUCKING IMBECILE USE A INFERRED METER HE IS NOT HUMAN.
inspectorcritic 7 months ago
Rarely do I see comments about how the driver was looking back and had dramatically slowed the car just prior to the spot JFK was shot.
dink65 7 months ago
He seems so sure about his theory, but how come JFK's head jerks forward at the moment of impact? That would mean that the very first premise, that the shot was fired from the front, is already questionable. Secondly, it was a limousine. For a rising shot, you'd have to clear the hood and pick a very low target that is the head of JFK. Even if it was from the side, that is still a very difficult shot. I'd like to see some more in depth analysis before I accept this even as a feasible proposal.
12OclockLow 7 months ago
The last REAL President this country ever had!!!
geminiwalker 7 months ago 3
@geminiwalker tru dat
yimnerr 7 months ago
I think I am going to open a Popeyes chicken in Kenya.
spm1021 7 months ago