"Its magazine contained only 20 rounds, meaning that it had to be constantly reloaded"
WTF kind of small arm, automatic or not, doesn't need constant reloading? Seriously... they should have said something like it had to be reloaded more frequently, therefore could cost the soldier his life while he reloaded in the face of enemy fire.
if you want a argument why 7.62x39 or 7.62x51 as opposed to 5.56 or 5.45, what the STG44s 7.92x33 bullet does to the wood cover and the poor man behind itis pretty impresive and scary. Call me traditional, but it believe that a military grade weapon should have the power to punch through cover and kill the enemy on the other side.
Greetings everyone! My name is Tim and I am a military historian. I have just publishe a book all aboutt the Battle of the Bulge. The title is: THE ARDENNES ON FIRE: VOLUME ONE. In it, I provide extensive detail on the massive German military buildup prior to the launching of this massive assault. Then, I describe the first 24 hours of the German attack in precise detail. The book has 101 photos and many fine maps. You can purchase it through Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble. You'll love it!
The Sturmgewehr 44 is simply the best,all assault rifles of today are made after the Stg 44!All German technology is always the best no question about it!
The B A R was not notorios for jamming. It was a reasonably reliable weapon.Yes it was large and cumbersome bu tnever the less a very good weapon! Clyde Barrow thought so!!!!!
You could never compare The allies soldiers with the Germans.The Germans occupieded all of Europe For 2 months,They had everything skilled,,Brave ,experienc,s,militancy ect.
In the WW2 Germany had 400 000 Dead
The allies Had 600 000O - counting only British and Americans Dead In only less then one year .FUNNY
In Russia Germany had 5 000 000 milion dead
Numbers here say Everything Without The russsians America and England would easy lose the war they had much luck.
@Silnius I gotta admit, I'm more of a karate girl, an actress, studying the Resistance: working on the first groups of young resistants, mostly Communists, in Paris,; but damn would I want to fire one of those Sturmgewehr 44 !!
the reason the stg 44 or mp 44 was in short supple was cuz hitler didnt like them and ordered product to stop until later in the war but it was to late to save germany
well to be more realistic, it was expensive to manufacture and time consuming, even with Stamp metal technology, like the MG-42 it was ahead of its time
@weiliiiiiii The Germans are ahead economically but technologically, the US army is still the Most advanced in the world. The Germans own the best tank, but we helped them, and we own the Second best, The M1A1 Abrams. We also have the best navy and some even say airforce. We have UCAV's, The Comanche, Apache, AC-130, and most of all, the A-10 Warthog, the best air- to ground aircraft in the world. I dont know if you were talking about Modern or WWII, but they were in WWII.
the bulet stuck in the ejector is not a jam but a "Stovepipe" : - "A firearm malfunction in shooting in which the empty cartridge case jams vertically in the ejection port of the gun instead of being thrown clear, a condition usually caused by not holding the firearm correctly, or "limp-wristing".
Aw hell, they didn't just say that about the BAR did they? Morons.
Sure it's heavy, but it's a monster and it's light enough for one man to carry. Tremendous penetration through wood and thin metal with the AP ammo, easily controlled and accurate, tough as hell, etc...
the BAR was an odd weapon. Not an assualt weapon or a true light machine gun. However it's 7.62x63mm is very impressive. To think this was desgined in WW1 is amazing!
yeah totally, i think the bar was only effective when used on a bi-pod, but where the americans lacked i nthe machine gun department, they more than made up for it with the M1 rifles vs the germans rifle,
@Creedo77 no, i dont think so. the bar was kind of the squad machine gun. the germans squad machine gun was first the mg34, then teh mg42. that beast of a gun fired 1200 to 1500 rounds a minute...
@1993heavenshallburn you see i see it the other way around ,, because the thompson was designed in 1919 and the mp 40 in 1938 ,,, so to me the thompson was first
@lesterclaypool1 i just meant that the thompson was the equivalent of the german mp40. and hey, that wasnt the first submachine gun ever. that was the german mp18.
@1993heavenshallburn oh no i know it was nt first ,,and i do say it was a good as the mp 40 ,, i was just stating it was used and i believe it was a very useful gun ,, more expensive than the m3 but a good gun ,,, and the mp18 was not the first machine gun [1718 j puckle ] and again[ 1861 richard gatling ] i believe these were the first
@1993heavenshallburn ha ? whats that about ? ,,, did i miss some thing ? i dont even know what the point of this discussion was but thats fine have a good day .
It was a light machine gun, not a rifle, and in its class (machine gun) it was a very weak weapon, especially compared to the MG42. Only 20 rounds so pretty much suppressing fire was not an option.
@chinesecommunist it is very much a good weapon, but believe me, any weapons expert would tell you that the Stg 44 or MP 44 was the best small arms of the war, maybe not as significant coz not many were made and it was only produced in 1944 but nonetheless, the best light weapon of WW2
@chinesecommunist yeah right, there are alot of people tellin you the german weapons were way ahead of the time. but in my opinion the us infantry weaponary was well balanced and fuckin sexy....
The Hertzer was everything the maus tank was not. At that point of the war it just want the german army needed and all it could afford to build in decent numbers. Yhe jadpanther was the optimal AFV for germany at that time. what could the maus tank do? Use it like the Elephant? A single strong-point, easly by-passed or hit in the air or by arty that the allies possessed in mass
the maus land battleship could have worked well at the battle of berlin and the during the battles of east prussia if well supplied with ammo, fuel and if well supported by soldiers.
the muas tank was one of the german tanks that i wish the german had more time to produce. they only made two, one was destroyed, and the other maus was captured by the russians. this tank was twice the size of the king tiger
Being able to anticipate weather, (thanks to offshore U boats), makes me all the more curious why Hitler chose to move the wounded battleship Tirpitz during a time of cloudless skies
"Its magazine contained only 20 rounds, meaning that it had to be constantly reloaded"
WTF kind of small arm, automatic or not, doesn't need constant reloading? Seriously... they should have said something like it had to be reloaded more frequently, therefore could cost the soldier his life while he reloaded in the face of enemy fire.
ricojes 1 month ago in playlist Battle of the Bulge
Isn't the MP-44 the STG-44 in World at War? Also known as the first assault rifle?
chrisjin11 6 months ago
if you want a argument why 7.62x39 or 7.62x51 as opposed to 5.56 or 5.45, what the STG44s 7.92x33 bullet does to the wood cover and the poor man behind itis pretty impresive and scary. Call me traditional, but it believe that a military grade weapon should have the power to punch through cover and kill the enemy on the other side.
MatoVuc 1 year ago
Greetings everyone! My name is Tim and I am a military historian. I have just publishe a book all aboutt the Battle of the Bulge. The title is: THE ARDENNES ON FIRE: VOLUME ONE. In it, I provide extensive detail on the massive German military buildup prior to the launching of this massive assault. Then, I describe the first 24 hours of the German attack in precise detail. The book has 101 photos and many fine maps. You can purchase it through Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble. You'll love it!
SWALE1984 1 year ago
the ak-47 was like a copy of stg-44
jomardomingo77 1 year ago
in concept only. the true copy of the STG44 is the CETME and G3 family. The AK is completly different internally.
MatoVuc 1 year ago
Did you notice they didn't let him reload it? How ridiculous.
thoumaturgica 1 year ago
The Sturmgewehr 44 is simply the best,all assault rifles of today are made after the Stg 44!All German technology is always the best no question about it!
Estmann111 1 year ago
StG44 influenced almost every aussault rifle. Nice weapon, looks great =)
greetz
mbtfp 2 years ago
The B A R was not notorios for jamming. It was a reasonably reliable weapon.Yes it was large and cumbersome bu tnever the less a very good weapon! Clyde Barrow thought so!!!!!
GV889 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You could never compare The allies soldiers with the Germans.The Germans occupieded all of Europe For 2 months,They had everything skilled,,Brave ,experienc,s,militancy ect.
In the WW2 Germany had 400 000 Dead
The allies Had 600 000O - counting only British and Americans Dead In only less then one year .FUNNY
In Russia Germany had 5 000 000 milion dead
Numbers here say Everything Without The russsians America and England would easy lose the war they had much luck.
amirturist25 2 years ago
if germany won over russia the war would have gone on for another year..................unless us used there atom bomb on germany
bearhaulin120 2 years ago
I'm sure he's firing blanks, I've fired that weapon before and its recoil is just like hell.
Fire the BAR like he does and I think it will be more of an anti-aircraft gun.
SchwarzeProminence 2 years ago
So u didn't see the splash of the rounds hitting behind the targets?
dblancer 2 years ago
STG 44 is gorgeous. just a awsome looking infantry assault rifle
Silnius 2 years ago
@Silnius I gotta admit, I'm more of a karate girl, an actress, studying the Resistance: working on the first groups of young resistants, mostly Communists, in Paris,; but damn would I want to fire one of those Sturmgewehr 44 !!
KalikaInLeather 11 months ago
the reason the stg 44 or mp 44 was in short supple was cuz hitler didnt like them and ordered product to stop until later in the war but it was to late to save germany
dock534 2 years ago
well to be more realistic, it was expensive to manufacture and time consuming, even with Stamp metal technology, like the MG-42 it was ahead of its time
Silnius 2 years ago
The MP44 aka the Sturmgewehr 44, the Godfather of all Assualt Rifles.
EvilFingers 2 years ago
Comment removed
mihaelmartinovic 2 years ago
Did he say 69 ton tank!!!
Holy shit I had no idea they were that large, were those the tiger tanks?
weiliiiiiii 2 years ago 4
I think the 69 ton tank was a king tiger
TOMROX75 2 years ago 4
Konigstiger-KingTiger
Silnius 2 years ago
The King Tiger was a good Heavy Tank for Large Open Country, but used in the confines of a city, the Tank was useless.
EvilFingers 2 years ago
The German army is incredible, always leading the way with technology.
No wonder we got our hands on Wernher von braun to help with our space program.
weiliiiiiii 2 years ago 20
@weiliiiiiii The Germans are ahead economically but technologically, the US army is still the Most advanced in the world. The Germans own the best tank, but we helped them, and we own the Second best, The M1A1 Abrams. We also have the best navy and some even say airforce. We have UCAV's, The Comanche, Apache, AC-130, and most of all, the A-10 Warthog, the best air- to ground aircraft in the world. I dont know if you were talking about Modern or WWII, but they were in WWII.
TheDARIEN54321 6 months ago
6:39 looks like Norway :p
Norguy77 2 years ago
the bulet stuck in the ejector is not a jam but a "Stovepipe" : - "A firearm malfunction in shooting in which the empty cartridge case jams vertically in the ejection port of the gun instead of being thrown clear, a condition usually caused by not holding the firearm correctly, or "limp-wristing".
anteracmacash 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
5.41 wtf piper was a war criminal. bloody SS. that old dude still would probably fight for the SS
msduicp 2 years ago
yea all SS oficers were evil almost all!
mihaelmartinovic 2 years ago
You gotta love the evil music when the guy picks up the MP-44. It says "uh oh we're in deep sh*t now" lol.
kapelmuur 2 years ago
Aw hell, they didn't just say that about the BAR did they? Morons.
Sure it's heavy, but it's a monster and it's light enough for one man to carry. Tremendous penetration through wood and thin metal with the AP ammo, easily controlled and accurate, tough as hell, etc...
A fine rifle in every way.
chinesecommunist 3 years ago 14
the BAR was an odd weapon. Not an assualt weapon or a true light machine gun. However it's 7.62x63mm is very impressive. To think this was desgined in WW1 is amazing!
kingtiger88 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
mihaelmartinovic 2 years ago
@kingtiger88 Though it was amazing.. If troops doesn't value it. It was meaningless after all.
Anubayan7 1 year ago
@kingtiger88
yeah totally, i think the bar was only effective when used on a bi-pod, but where the americans lacked i nthe machine gun department, they more than made up for it with the M1 rifles vs the germans rifle,
Creedo77 1 year ago
@Creedo77 no, i dont think so. the bar was kind of the squad machine gun. the germans squad machine gun was first the mg34, then teh mg42. that beast of a gun fired 1200 to 1500 rounds a minute...
1993heavenshallburn 1 year ago
@1993heavenshallburn didnt the americans have the thompson ?
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
@lesterclaypool1 yes, they had, and the m3 grease gun. but those are submachineguns, the american version of the german mp40.
1993heavenshallburn 1 year ago
@lesterclaypool1 yes, they had, and the m3 grease gun. but those are submachineguns, the american version of the german mp40.
1993heavenshallburn 1 year ago
@1993heavenshallburn you see i see it the other way around ,, because the thompson was designed in 1919 and the mp 40 in 1938 ,,, so to me the thompson was first
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
@lesterclaypool1 i just meant that the thompson was the equivalent of the german mp40. and hey, that wasnt the first submachine gun ever. that was the german mp18.
1993heavenshallburn 1 year ago
@1993heavenshallburn oh no i know it was nt first ,,and i do say it was a good as the mp 40 ,, i was just stating it was used and i believe it was a very useful gun ,, more expensive than the m3 but a good gun ,,, and the mp18 was not the first machine gun [1718 j puckle ] and again[ 1861 richard gatling ] i believe these were the first
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
@lesterclaypool1 i was talking about submachinguns that can be controlled by one man, not a full sized machinegun.
1993heavenshallburn 1 year ago
@1993heavenshallburn i was taking about machine guns
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
@lesterclaypool1 well, i was talking about submachineguns. ha! xD
1993heavenshallburn 1 year ago
@1993heavenshallburn ha ? whats that about ? ,,, did i miss some thing ? i dont even know what the point of this discussion was but thats fine have a good day .
lesterclaypool1 1 year ago
Only drawback is the 20 round magazine, the BAR could of been adapted to take a drum, would of worked alot better in the squad support role.
Erhabenheiten 2 years ago
@chinesecommunist
It was a light machine gun, not a rifle, and in its class (machine gun) it was a very weak weapon, especially compared to the MG42. Only 20 rounds so pretty much suppressing fire was not an option.
serialkiller1990 1 year ago
@chinesecommunist it is very much a good weapon, but believe me, any weapons expert would tell you that the Stg 44 or MP 44 was the best small arms of the war, maybe not as significant coz not many were made and it was only produced in 1944 but nonetheless, the best light weapon of WW2
panzerelite195 10 months ago
@chinesecommunist yeah right, there are alot of people tellin you the german weapons were way ahead of the time. but in my opinion the us infantry weaponary was well balanced and fuckin sexy....
satanic666sonic 10 months ago
@chinesecommunist snow...a BAR in deep snow. what's your comment about it?
IMNODOCTOR 5 months ago
looking at the person shooting, it doesn't mater if he uses a bar or mp44... he still cant hit the target LOL!
Swampdog36 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Elite - There is an interesting correlation between Hitler and Lil' Bush:
Both refused to listen to their experts; and rather listened to their instincts, (thereby subjecting the world to their delusions of grandeur)
sugarpuddin88 3 years ago
yea :D
ELITEnoOBno2 3 years ago
the muas tank was much too big, slow, expensive to build, and underpowered to be an effective AFV.
procopro 3 years ago
No, no and no.
ELITEnoOBno2 3 years ago
The Hertzer was everything the maus tank was not. At that point of the war it just want the german army needed and all it could afford to build in decent numbers. Yhe jadpanther was the optimal AFV for germany at that time. what could the maus tank do? Use it like the Elephant? A single strong-point, easly by-passed or hit in the air or by arty that the allies possessed in mass
procopro 3 years ago
Yes, I know, I know.
It was a rolling bunker, to slow to advance, and to slow to retreat ;) It had at the front 20 and 24cm thick armor!!
ELITEnoOBno2 3 years ago
the maus land battleship could have worked well at the battle of berlin and the during the battles of east prussia if well supplied with ammo, fuel and if well supported by soldiers.
procopro 3 years ago
the muas tank was one of the german tanks that i wish the german had more time to produce. they only made two, one was destroyed, and the other maus was captured by the russians. this tank was twice the size of the king tiger
ryaguy84 4 years ago
Being able to anticipate weather, (thanks to offshore U boats), makes me all the more curious why Hitler chose to move the wounded battleship Tirpitz during a time of cloudless skies
sugarpuddin88 4 years ago
I want more!!!! Thank you!!!
oahu223 4 years ago