Added: 3 years ago
From: v1lle3
Views: 21,057
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (131)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1:11 probably deaf by shooting inside there.. :P

  • @Speluncus

    Haha, yes.

  • what is AF and AA? i only know of this game thru the company that made it. action forms and i only know them thru the carnivores saga

  • @darkmyth2

    AA = Anti-aliasing (Making more smooth edges)

    AF = Anisotropic Filtering (Sharper textures, I think)

  • @v1lle3

    AF combats the textures becoming distorted and fuzzy when viewed at an extreme angle.

  • @xalener

    Aha, thanks for clearing it out!

  • What this game needed was real-time lighting.

  • isnt this game hard as fuck to run? cuse its badly made

  • I feel you man, i get shit frames on this too, well with physx on, its not too bad off but the america demo is to damn buggy

  • what makes me not to buy the game are the horrible hand models.

  • @thevladdo

    Lol. Are you serious? :P

  • @v1lle3 well yeah, i mean the hands look like they're carved out of cardboard ._. , despite that the rest of the game looks very good graphically.

  • 1. That's retarded.

    2. Get a job.

    3. Fair enough.

  • @Gixbit

    :P

  • I'll be the first to say that this guy obviously has got the first aim but he has the 2nd worst aim I've seen in a variety of situations where he could have chosen a headshot. Unless headshots don't count ever?

  • @Gixbit

    1. Actually, headshots does not count in this game.

    2. Bad frame rate.

    3. My aim might suck a bit anyway.

  • @v1lle3 ya im right with ur framerate and ur aim i got the russian version but i put a patch to change tittle and subtittles and it works very good on my computer

    but thats no reason to say this game "oh this game its not funny" or "this game sucks" no this game is good and 4 the beginners :) understand that

  • you omitted one of the best scenes, the first time the guy/monster whatever using 2 machineguns appears, accompanied by siren sounds

  • @bjohnblazkowicz

    Yea, that scene is amazing. Love those things!

  • I get playable framerates (that doesn't mean it's always smooth). i7 960 with a GTX 470. To be honest, it really doesn't matter how powerful your rig is. This game is just poorly optimized for the latest processors. Hell, you might be better off has a processor that's a generation or two old.

  • i heard there is a way to make my dual core pc run with only one? does anyone know how to do this exactly. i am iiiitcching to play this game but its sooooo poorly optimized on multi core pcs i cant = / anyone help please???

  • the feel of this game is awesome, but the game jumps up and down too much, i have to switch it off, any idea how i can fix that

  • this game is like metro 2033 accept you are on a frozen boat and by yourself with zombies.. i really like it one of the best games

  • wish u didnt need such a fast pc just to play this game.

  • You probably don´t need a killer PC to play on low, but then you also miss a big part of the game, since the atmosphere lies much in the graphics.

  • i hate crysis 1&2

    my friend loves it but i think it sucks beacuse everything but the graphics are mediocre to bad and graphics are not everything in a game. the story the gameplay and the multiplayer are way more important (my opinion)

    v1lle3, what do u think bout crysis?

  • I think Crysis is one of the worst games I´ve played. It can be a bit fun with some mod (want to try the DeLorean mod).

    I prefer old graphics, because they look better (not more realistic) than for example Crysis graphics.

  • :D.

  • @gabiarepere do u play lost planet? cause the game lost plaet 2 runs 4 my computer in minimum settings. i think im a lucky person to play this :)

  • great game.finished it yesterday and i was more than impressed by the story.russians should keep it up with this kind of games.

  • Hey i looked in the options menu and i was wondering how can you turn on physx? There is somethg called hardware physics but it isn't giving those nice effects.

  • Options>Video> Advanced PhysX Effects ON/OFF.

  • Hm, i found out i needed to patch the game. But i can't turn it on. :(

  • You need to have a Nvidia card and it needs to be 8-series or newer.

  • Fixed it, shaders needed to be set at 4.0. Thanks for the help.

  • Aha, ok, didn´t know that :P Nice that you figured it out :D

  • is the rifle a mosin nagant?

  • Yes :D

  • hey i had never head abou this game so what is this games idea. like wtf are those human things and what ur doing there?

  • Check description ;)

  • this game has high demand in terms of graphic cards, i play this on my 9600gt and still have shitty frames. E8500 oc to 3.8ghz ,.

  • Yea, 9600GT doesn´t have too much to say, when it comes to this game I´m afraid.

  • You still could lower your resolution to 1600x1200, and it won't kill your fps as bad if your using a simple monitor like a 22-30 inch. If your using a HDTV then well.. Leave your resolution the same. But change it if its a monitor you are using. Will save a TON of fps.

  • 4:3 ratio looks like shit on a 16:10 screen, so no I wont.

  • Then do a SMALLER 16:10 resolution then. There are custom resolutions in your ATI or NVidia control panels.

  • If I can run this game in a window, then I will definitely lower, but to run low res in fullscreen mode is not nice.

    I havent found any option in the menu to change to "windowed mode".

    Maybe I can change it in some config file, haven´t checked yet :P

  • dude no wonder you got shitty fps. turn down the AA and resolution! no point in having 1920x1200 lol.

  • I prefer resolution/graphics/AA in front of fps :P Always highest ;).

  • so you would rather have 20 fps with all setting on max when you could keep settings on max and just lower the AA and resolution to something like 4x and 1280×720 and get smooth 30-35 fps

  • Yup.

    20 vs 30-35 is not much in a game with motion blur, 20 vs 60 is more nice, but I still prefer highest ;)

  • well maybe you even get 60 fps if you do that :)

  • Yea, but I still don´t care ;P I just have to buy a new gfx ;D

  • This is actually really good for recording.... REALLY good. If he wasnt recording this would be smoother than the video.

  • Whats the diff in FPS between recording and not recording.

  • About nothing, the game already has so low fps, fraps don´t take much at all.

    The fps I´ve written in description is without fraps, with it I get maybe 2-3 fps lower.

    In the places I get 30-40 without, I maybe get 5-10 lower.

  • if u like jumping around like a monkey like in crysis and super battle you will say its crap but if you don't then this game fits good!

  • This is better than Crysis in all aspects (imo) except graphics, but it´s still looking very good.

  • i've heard lots of bad and good things about this game. i've heared its fun while others have told me its not even worth playing because its so badly optimized. i'm assuming it'l run just fine on my rig

    core i7 920 @3.3 ghz

    gtx 275

    6 gigs of ram

    anyhoo just wonderin if the game is worth tryin out

    peace out homeez! =P

  • I think it´s the best game ever, so it´s worth the try if you ask me.

    I think you should clock your CPU higher to get good performance, like 4GHz. This game only uses one CPU core.

    Your graphics card is probably enough, about the same performance as mine, but you may need an extra card for the PhysX, a 8800/9800GT or somehing.

  • Don't tell him to overclock his CPU to 4 GHz, that would destroy his computer!

    Overclocking can actually be very dangerous, and as his CPU is amazing (it's actually better than what you have) he doesn't want to ruin it.

    His card is a little better than yours so he should be fine there. Using another card for PhysX is not worth it as it doesn't really affect performance very much with the more powerful nVidia cards.

  • Yea, I know his CPU is way better, but I think he still need to overclock it to get the game run well.

    His grapchics card cant be better, or? Isn´t the GTX280 better than the GTX275?

  • That's what I don't like about the nVidia naming scheme.

    The GTX275 is a little better than the 280 or comparable to it. It's pretty much 2 GTX250's put together.

  • yes the gtx 280 is a bit better than the gtx 275 but performance wise i really haven't noticed too much of a difference.

    and i heard about the whole only uses 1 core thing.

    i checked up on the cryostasis forums and they said that it was confirmed that they would release a patch fixing this! WHOOOO HOOO!!

  • Nice! That´s good news :)

  • dude wtf? turn down the resolution. and it will run smoothly

  • Wtf? Maybe I want it to look good :P

  • hmm, maybe you should lower your resolution..

  • Haha, no, I don´t want to, since there is no option to play in windowed mode, it looks like shit in lower resolution ;)

  • lol, cuz with that low fps it's not even worth playing... my opinion.

  • Haha, well, in my opinion it is :P Because of motion blur.

  • true, it's a real fps eater i've heard :D

  • I mean, motion blur makes it playable :P

    But I´ve heard that too.

  • This game was fun...I thoroughly enjoyed it. It had some really interesting aspects I haven't seen before!

    BTW...I never planned on getting this game...I got it free with my graphics card!!!!! I'm glad I didn't miss this game!!!

  • Cool :D

  • You are shit.

  • fuck , my computer sounds like a train wreck when i play this game. not saying i cant handle it.

  • Haha, I guess it´s pretty hard for it at least :P

  • a really good game... but i never have balls to play a horror games... i mean i am to scared...

  • You better get some balls then, because you can´t skip this awesome genre!

  • i am playing a dark sektor write now and when the dead people coming to me from graveyard... fucking to scary! sorry for my english... i am from montenegro :))

  • No problem, it´s pretty scary, but that´s so nice with this game :D

  • this game is sooo poorly optimized. It uses 1 core, no multithreading. that absolutely destroys fps.

  • Yea, but lower your resolution, then you get good fps, but I prefer resolution in front of fps.

  • i heard that

  • its funny this game has a great story but its way to slow paced for me, i got to the first SMG and then just never played it at all

  • I think it was nice, not too fast :P

  • at 2:43 BOOM HEADSHOT! cwutididthar?

  • such a weird game

  • Yea, but it´s fantastic :D

  • i like it, but its just so unoptimized and glitchy. my gtx 285 lags awfully with high settings. it also has 0 multithreading, but the story seemed good. i only did the demo and there isnt much plot development at all

  • Lower the resolution, then you get way better fps. I got a 30 fps boost by lowering from 1920x1200 to 1280x800, but it doesn´t look so good then, if you only could choose "run in a window" :(

  • no you dont set physx ingame, you set it in the nvidia control panel if you have a physx driver installed (all latest drivers should have it)

  • Ok :D

  • Awesome computer man!

  • Thx, but it´s starting to get old now :P

  • there seems to be nothing new this game brings in...im not even sure ill be bothered downloading it for free

  • I think it brings much things, or at least changes things from standard fps games.

  • we have the same video card what fps i whould get at 1280x1024 over 100?

  • No, definitely not, here I get 15-20, but I tested with 1280x800 earlier and got 50-60, which was very surprising.

  • wow then heavy game m8 ty for answer me

  • how much performance do you get back with aa and af at a lower amount?. i play crysis at the same resolution with 8x aa and get a constant 30-45 fps but i hear that this game has a few performance issues. at least until the patch comes out so the game supports multi cpu functionality.

  • Ok... what specs? I run Crysis without AA and get 15-30 :(

    I don´t think the performance will change much in Cryostasis, at least not by lowering AF, AA may give a little bit fps-boost.

  • right i down loaded the tech demo. first thing that struck me was how damn fast the demo ran! this was at a lowish resolution (1360x768) with 8 af on and the rest maxed. i averaged about 50 frams there. so i cranked it up to 1920x1200 damn the detail was amazing but the loss in fps was huge like 20 or 30 ish average so i knocked the AF off and it helped a little but i think ill have to settle to a lower resolution like 1360 x 768. i like a smooth ride then a detailed slide show.

  • Where did you get the demo at?

  • im stuck on it :(

    on level TIES there r 2 guys one gets shot and then u get shot trying save guys soul u get something off floor too send down ladder so i go up and i keep dieing u kno wot to do any help would help lol, ty

  • There is a second ladder, take it down, not the first ;)

  • omg I got the game today and all i can say is WOW!

    i'm upto the level SWAMP

    graphics are amazing and i don't lag 1 bit yet on high settings, amazing!

    gameplay is fun and i'm lovin it! :D

  • Nice :D Great that you like it :D

  • Very nice video v1lle3

    I can't wait to get this game, I bought this and Necrovision from GAME both cost £25

    thats £12.50 each :D

    Cya

  • Nice mate, you wont get dissapointed ;)

  • i think the optimization of this game is good, so many people say its bad but were in next gen now! shitty old pc's just dont cut it anymore, you need to have a next gen pc, its not bad optimization if it doesnt work on a crap pc.

  • Yea, of course it´s next-gen, but it´s bad that the game uses only one CPU-core, it would probably run better on my PC then, because I don´t have so high GHz.

  • i have a core 2 duo E8400 3.2ghz

    4gb ram

    9800gx2

    vista sp1 and this game runs perfectly fine...

  • You have a bit better clock on CPU, but what resolution? It seems like it makes a pretty big difference, I usually play in 1920x1200, but yesterday I tried in 1280x800 and at least in the beginning of the game, I have 50-60 fps compared to max 30 in normal resolution.

  • yeh true, i usaly use 1280x720 or 1280x1024 because my monitor is not good with res.... but if your using that high of a res then you dont need AA, so that will save you like 5fps tho, rite?

  • Well, yea, maybe :P But it´s playable enough :)

  • lol, thats the main thing.

  • Yesss, I want better graphics more than better fps :P

  • our pc's are identical yayyy.

  • Nice :D Do you enjoy maxing games on it? :P

  • Hey, how did that go? :)

  • Sorry that it took so long, didn´t have it installed.

    I tested some minutes ago, but you couldn´t choose if you wanted PhysX on or off :/

    But I´m using the russian version, buying the european soon ;) Maybe you can change it in that.

  • Hey can you do me a favoure v1lle3. I've been wondering about physx for a while now. Can you try this game with physx mode enabled and disabled and see if there's a difference in performance? This is one of the few new games that supports it :/

  • It should be a difference, but if you disable it you get normal physics which also takes a bit of the performance.

    I´ll test tomorrow ;)

  • fail game

  • Nottt :P

    It´s just about taste ;)

  • When is this coming out in the US? I can't wait...

  • April 20th, you can order now from Gamestop/EB Games ;)

  • Thanks =-)

  • Strange, it should be on 100% on that core :/

  • DOGS!!!! i hate dogs!! remembered me of silent hill, thosebloody dogs

  • Dogs are scary :O

  • Yea, but the game only uses ONE CPU core, that´s why you get low fps, the CPU probably has to be on 4GHz to get good performance.

  • Yeah condemned is awesome too!!! that game rules really

  • That 's because it is CPU bound, heavy physics on the CPU. The only chance for somebody to play this game in a playable manner with a single core CPU is to offload the physics from the CPU and assign them to PhysX (either a single nVidia VGA or SLI tandem or descrete second nVidia VGA exclusive for Physics).If you have single core CPU and ATI card, even 4870X2 X2 in Crossfire, this game is a no go. Of course this (single core CPU and 4870X2 quadCF) is an overkill, but I give an idea...

  • It doesn´t matter if you have a single CPU or a quad core, this game uses only ONE CPU core, that sucks :( The reason I get so bad performance.

  • Did you tryed CPU-Controll mate?! Try this programm please, let's see if it's work!

  • Thanx for the tip mate :D

  • Opty paired with ATI 4850 and 1.5 GB ram gives 15 fps avg (and frequent 0fps stuttering because of lack of ram and 7-8 fps slowdowns because of lack of VGA powah) @ 1920x1200 AA on, 16xAF, all maxed out, but shaders 3.0.

    Lowering details even at lowest possible settings (800x600, all low, shaders 2.0, no AA/AF) would give a very small boost like 22-23 fps avg (compared to 15 fps all maxed out).

  • For those who like Cryostasis, you should try Condemned: Criminal Origins. It is as good, if not even better.

    I have finished chapter 13, 14-18 remain. So far so good, but my once upon a timemighty single core Opty @ 2.8 GHz is struggling.

  • Condemned is awesome, I want Condemned 2 to come for PC :(((

  • That would be so AWESOME!!! I love condemned 1 and I played demo of 2 at friends xnox and it was awesome too :((

  • this game is awesome! I didn´t know anything about this game and to be honest, at the beginnig of this it looked like a pretty shitty game, but playing it 30 min., i`ve become addictec to it!!

    To: v1lle3....... -Can you play it with shder 4.0?? my resolution changes to 4:3 when i set to shadermodelling 4.0..

  • Yea, I play with Shader Model 4.0 and widescreen.

    Amazing atmosphere in the game, isn´t it?

  • I´ve just tryed it again and now its working!

    Of course,! finally a game where i get scary of it. again...... after the disapointment with fear 2 i found a game with a amazing atmosphere!!

    You get the best sound with an 5.1 sound system and a highend Computer!!

  • Yup, I have the computer, but not 5.1 sound, still amazing though.

  • Fear 2 had a pretty damn good atmosphere.

  • no, bud389.....have you ever played FEAR 1??

    if not you won´t understand me.... because comparing FEAR 1 with FEAR 2 you would know that that the atmosphere has going much down in FEAR 2...

    Play Fear 1!! YOu´ll recognize that graühics even aren´t as bad as you will think although this game is 4 years older than his follower....

  • I'v played fear 1 plus one of it's expansions, and i can say that FEAR 2 is both more destructable and atmospheric. Fear 1 was just full of predictable and static little scares where as in FEAR 2 it has full on AI that's built to freak the shit out of you (ghosts, abominations, revenants) and with a larger array of colors in FEAR 2, and having fear 2 take place in more areas then just an office building, its very much more atmospheric. Little girls aren't scary, zombie looking psychic girls, are

  • I think F.E.A.R. 1 has the best atmosphere but F.E.A.R. 2 has great too.

    Anyway F.E.A.R. 2 was awesome, but too short, still worth 10/10

  • no blood, no gore???? ahh c'mon now

  • on my 8600gt works all medium fine :). This game is truly amaizing with his story and graphics.

  • i cant wait for this game to come out i pre-ordered it and they moved the release date to earlier so im gonna get it april 24!!!!!! i cant fucking wait!!!!!

  • It should be released now (in europe at least).

  • aww ur lucky :P

  • Whats up with all those dudes banging their cups on the ground?

    And why does an enemy jump out from the door, after you "touch" the guy?

  • Well, does everything have to make sense?

    That´s a cool thing in the game.

  • No, but...

    I dunno, my download has just finished, installing and VERY looking forward to this :)

  • Hope you have a good PC ;)

  • hey v1lle3 umm i have 2 questions...is the tech demo only for vista(cuz i have xp)? and is the game gonna be for xp/vista not jus vista? thnx.

  • The Tech demo is only for Vista, but the whole game works on XP ;)

  • ok cool im so glad it's for xp also cuz this game is gonna be so good!!!!!

  • omg dude i cant wait to play this game this is the best looking game i've seen in a while...thnx so much for psoting the gameplay!!!!!!!!

  • There should be a demo out, at least there is a tech demo, but you don´t play it, just watching how good it runs on your computer.

  • ok cool thnx so much i cant wait to play this game its gonna be awesome!!!!!!!

  • Still this is not a HD vid, it's only high quality vid :)

  • It is a HD video, but it´s not in youtube :( maybe because I have 16:10 aspect ratio instead of 16:9.

  • Yeah mabye

  • This game IS SCARY!!!!!!!!

    The same as FEAR or Doom 3

  • You never know what´s behind the next door...

    That´s the best thing with this game :))))

  • Whaoh, scaryyy. I must buy it. Thanks.

  • :DDD

  • this game isnt scary

  • wow a game that doesn't need blood to be scary- TAKE THAT FEAR 2!

  • :P This had some blood earlier (bloodpuffs when shooting someone) but of some reason they removed it, doesn´t matter though, this is fantastic anyway.

  • does somebody know how to pass the firs level,where is the dream scene with the dogs...txs

  • Yea, you have to jump on a cliff, to the dog, when you are by the ship. Hard to explain really.

  • WoW, nice. i've seen this before, just forgot to comment..

    So you got a better graphics card i see.. Nice!

    Handle FEAR on Max?

  • Have had the card since october, I get bad fps in FEAR actually, but that´s because the game is not optimised for high/widescreen resolutions.

    In FEAR 2 i get 80-100 fps mostly, on max with full aa and af in 1920x1200.

  • I've heard this is decent, but the combat looks terrible.