1:43 obama looks fucking dumb cuz he's not in front of that fucking teleprompter like he always is. Bush used it also, but Obama can't seem to operate without one.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The rascist, swift boaters that call themselves patriots want to hang this nonsense around Obama's neck cause they can't use the noose that they used to!
Pump the brakes, Efishant. Just because someone criticizes Obama, does not mean they are KKK. Try to stay within the bounds of logic and tell us why raising taxes on a huge block of middle-class Americans is a good idea. (74% of Americans earning less than $100K/yr pay capital gains tax.)
Try to understand arguments with which you disagree; only then can you truly understand your own. Those that oppose tax-&-spend liberals are not necessarily out at night lynching black people. Get a grip!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The Republicans under Bush have created the largets deficit in the history of the nation and they still have the nerve to call Dems the big tax and spenders! Hilarious!
What do Americans think that national debt is? Do they think it's a credit card that never has to be payed off? Yep, Republicans want you to think that you can have all the crap they promise and never have to pay for it! Nobody spends it like Bush did! This guy makes any Democrat look fiscally conservative!
How is that? Because Obama will tax the rich and the companies who emply the "ordinary Americans"? Then companies and businesses won't be able to pay "ordinary Americans" as much. How in the world would that be giving them a break?
I only have a couple of slices left. The government gave the rest of it away with the "New Deal" and the "Great Society" programs we are already saddled with. I wonder what Obamanomic surprise lies in wait to take the rest.
Government growth is something that should be resisted. Unfortunately, it does happen under ALL presidents, almost naturally. So at the very least, let's not elect someone who who actually promises to grow government... expanding it down avenues it has no business going.
If drilling was opened up there'd be competition and they'd all turn on each other to sell it cheaper than the other. That's what happens when a monopoly is crushed by the free market. Allow more drilling and competition will drive down oil cost. I don't mean to offend, but that's basic economics.
the oil companies refuse to drill on the leases they already own.
They own leases on SIXTY EIGHT MILLION ACRES that they could drill on tomorrow. but they don't want to bring prices down, that would eat into their profits. This "drill now" is a land grab for their future profits.
And oil that is drilled domestically goes to the world oil market to sell to the highest bidder which could be China or Russia. You're being scammed--again.
People are so ignorant! The land they are leasing requires EXPLORATION which costs many millions in personel and time and might not produce a drop of oil! Certain places on the coasts and other places they want to drill is a SURE THING. It's already been explored and they know there's oil there. Would you like to spend millions exploring land where there might not be a drop of oil? You'd be out millions. You especially wouldn't want to if there were sure things elsewhere!
yes, some people are so ignorant, how else would you explain this present administration? if the oil is too hard to get, why don't they give up some of the leases they are sitting on in order to gain more? that would at least make it seem like they were trying. and again any and all oil drilled domestically goes directly to the world oil market--while it may decrease prices slightly, no guarantee it will be used here in the US.
They can't gain additional land because the land they're leasing is the only land the Government will let them drill on. The governmentis not letting oil companies drill where there is oil.
Nope, you can't be more wrong. They close refineries because there are so many government regulations on oil and the way they refine it. Getting the product to the refinery became too expensive for them to justify it. There is a direct correlation between the government regulating and restricting oil refinery and production and the amount the oil companies put out. The refineries in the U.S. are old and not as efficient because the government won't allow new ones to be built.
I agree, we need to have other energy sources. But until we get those do you want to continue to pay $4.00 per gallon or would you like it to be less? Or at the very least put as much supply as we can into it so that we pay as little as possible? Obama stubbornly says no drilling. But again, logic says that we should drill while developing other energy sources so that the prive of gas stays as low as possible until we can tell OPEC to kiss out butts.
Yes doofus, it is traded on the world market. And we are part of the world. Study the basic economic law of supply and demand and you'll learn that when the supply goes up the price goes down. Us contributing to the world supply would make it GO DOWN. This is really not that hard. I can't help you anymore. You need to get an education.
Thank you for proving my point. Over taxation is the problem. The more the corporations are taxed, the less they can pay you and the more you are taxed the less you get. My point exactly. Thank you.
You can't tax a country into prosperity. Bush didn't have anything to do with the economy. It's the market! You people need to learn basic economics. And the way that we get out of debt is by NOT SPENDING AS MUCH! Not by taking money out of the economy. Cut out all those wasteful programs like McCain is proposing instead of dreaming up new ways to tax the people's hard earned income.
LOL. You can't even spell "lose" correctly. McCain did NOT say it would take 10 years. That was a liberal talking point until even Obama said recently it could happen in under 2 years. But he's not even saying that anymore because the oil companies have shown without doubt that they could have it to the pumps in less than 1 year. The only place it would take 10 years is AMWR in Alaska because they'd need another pipeline. Coastal drilling would put it at the pump in less than 1 year.
The market runs the economy, not the government! We aren't a communist nation. We are a free market society. The reason the market went down is the high price of oil because it affects everything because everything has to be shipped. So it costs companies more to do business. If Obama was in office he would have taxed the companies and made it even worse. The reason gas went so high is because Democrats blocked drilling for more oil to increase the supply. Basic college economics teaches that.
You've fallen for Obama's game. He plays word games with the different kinds of taxes the government burdens us with (Income tax, payroll tax, capital gains tax). The bottom line is that if you make 41000 or above you're taxes will go up in one of those areas. I don't know about you, but I don't care which pocket it comes out of--it's still the wasteful government taking my hard-earned money. Obama is a semi-communist who thinks the government should control the economy. Yuck.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
hey, how's that deregulation working out for you this week? keep up that republican agenda and we won't have to worry about paying taxes---we'll have nothing to tax! yay for Republican Fascism!
This jerk wants to take my money in the interest of "fairness" and for his social welfare programs. Fuck him. If this moron gets elected and raises capital gains it will drive people away from the market. What's the point of investing if you have to hand over almost 30% of what you make to the government?
The answer is for the government to SHRINK in size and stop coming up with new ways to spend money. The answer is not to take it out of our hide. Our government is far too overgrown and overfed. It needs to downsize. Obama wants it to grow in record amounts and we will have to pay for that out of our income. There's another word for that....communism.
Every Republican president since and including Herbert Hoover has increased the federal government's size, scope, or power--and usually all three. Over the last one hundred years, of the five presidents who presided over the largest domestic spending increases, four were Republicans. Include regulations and foreign policy, as well as budgets approved by a Republican Congress, and a picture begins to emerge of the Republican Party as a reliable engine of government growth.
You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are NOT entitled to your own facts: The number of workers on the federal payroll rose by 61,000 under Reagan. (By comparison, under Clinton, the number fell by 373,000.)
UNLESS you make MORE the $250,000 Obama will not raise your taxes. UNDER $100,000 and you'll actually get a tax break. Repubs are for the wealthiest, they've tricked you into believing they are on YOUR side, then they laugh all the way to the bank.....
Why should anyone have their taxes raised based on what they earn? Why punish success? What if the government would just SPEND LESS and stop inventing new ways to spend money? No government has any business taking nearly 40 percent of someone's income and then taking sales tax, property tax, capital gains taxes (on 401 K, etc.). How can you be happy with the government taking half of your income only to waste it?
it should be fair/equal amount for all. CEOs shouldn't be allowed to make millions, get tax break and fail to pay their employees enough to afford health insurance--I end up paying for their insurance with my taxes and the CEOs make a bundle. I pay about 25% in taxes, which not a TON of money, but millionaires pay less than 1%?? Why should I be "punished" for lack of success?
How can you be happy with the "stimulus" check that was borrowed partially from China?
John McAnus wants to continue the tax cuts for millionaires. When he starts a war with Iran, who do you think is going to pay for it? McAnus is the real disaster.
Why should someone pay a higher percentage of their income just because they make more? If I work two jobs and you only work one should I have to pay 40 percent of my income while you pay 20? That's not fair. You've drunk the liberal kool aid that envies those who are successful and wants to punish them. Liberals want to insure that you will never get there because they will tax it out of you.
REALCHRISTIANSINGLES come on are you serious. For your statement to bee true you would have to be making about a million dollars a year at both of your jobs. Please quit one and put in a good word for me at the other and while your at it maybe you could learn something about our tax system before you open your fucking mouth. That said vote Bob Barr the only true republican running. If your going to vote mccain watch these vids "mccain vs mccain" and "vietnam vet against mccain"
You don't know what you're talking about. If someone makes over 41,000 per year Obama said he would raise their taxes. And he'll raise it on anyone who has any investments. In fact, he'll double that tax rate. It doesn't matter what pocket it comes out of--he wants to take money away. I like Bob Barr too but he has no chance. But you really should have some grasp on the facts before saying I don't. My father is an accountant and we've talked extensively on taxes.
McLame cheated on his wife and kids and had sex with another woman. ONCE A CHEATER ALWAYS A CHEATER. Do we want a cheater for president, what a disgrace that would be for USA to have a man with NO morals as a leader. Whats that saying to the world. If he would cheat on his OWN FAMILY what would he do to strangers like us? cant trust a cheater, once you cheat thats a BIG deal breaker right there. Cant vote for him, he no good to his OWN family, you think he's gonna care about yours?
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you President Obama for cutting my taxes! I got the biggest refund EVER!!!
blazak 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you President Obama for cutting my taxes! I got the biggest refund EVER!!!
blazak 1 year ago
1:43 obama looks fucking dumb cuz he's not in front of that fucking teleprompter like he always is. Bush used it also, but Obama can't seem to operate without one.
WuTangShogun36 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The rascist, swift boaters that call themselves patriots want to hang this nonsense around Obama's neck cause they can't use the noose that they used to!
EFISHANT 3 years ago
Pump the brakes, Efishant. Just because someone criticizes Obama, does not mean they are KKK. Try to stay within the bounds of logic and tell us why raising taxes on a huge block of middle-class Americans is a good idea. (74% of Americans earning less than $100K/yr pay capital gains tax.)
Try to understand arguments with which you disagree; only then can you truly understand your own. Those that oppose tax-&-spend liberals are not necessarily out at night lynching black people. Get a grip!
patriotfront 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Republicans under Bush have created the largets deficit in the history of the nation and they still have the nerve to call Dems the big tax and spenders! Hilarious!
What do Americans think that national debt is? Do they think it's a credit card that never has to be payed off? Yep, Republicans want you to think that you can have all the crap they promise and never have to pay for it! Nobody spends it like Bush did! This guy makes any Democrat look fiscally conservative!
EFISHANT 3 years ago
janesbusby = expressing yourself in written form might not be the right hobby for you.
patriotfront 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bush Snr = Broken Economy
Bush Jnr = More Broken Economy
McCain openly says "I don't understand economics".
Palin took her small town of 9,000 people from surplus into debt.
McCain = ?
VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN !
VOTE FOR FINANCIAL RUIN !
janebusby 3 years ago
How is that? Because Obama will tax the rich and the companies who emply the "ordinary Americans"? Then companies and businesses won't be able to pay "ordinary Americans" as much. How in the world would that be giving them a break?
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
AWESOME video - thanks patriotfront
cecefranki 3 years ago
Obama / Obiden 08' Kiss your pie goodbye
NiemandBinich 3 years ago 2
hey, you STILL have pie? most of us have lost it already.
razberryberet 3 years ago
I only have a couple of slices left. The government gave the rest of it away with the "New Deal" and the "Great Society" programs we are already saddled with. I wonder what Obamanomic surprise lies in wait to take the rest.
NiemandBinich 3 years ago 3
Government growth is something that should be resisted. Unfortunately, it does happen under ALL presidents, almost naturally. So at the very least, let's not elect someone who who actually promises to grow government... expanding it down avenues it has no business going.
patriotfront 3 years ago
If drilling was opened up there'd be competition and they'd all turn on each other to sell it cheaper than the other. That's what happens when a monopoly is crushed by the free market. Allow more drilling and competition will drive down oil cost. I don't mean to offend, but that's basic economics.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
the oil companies refuse to drill on the leases they already own.
They own leases on SIXTY EIGHT MILLION ACRES that they could drill on tomorrow. but they don't want to bring prices down, that would eat into their profits. This "drill now" is a land grab for their future profits.
And oil that is drilled domestically goes to the world oil market to sell to the highest bidder which could be China or Russia. You're being scammed--again.
razberryberet 3 years ago
People are so ignorant! The land they are leasing requires EXPLORATION which costs many millions in personel and time and might not produce a drop of oil! Certain places on the coasts and other places they want to drill is a SURE THING. It's already been explored and they know there's oil there. Would you like to spend millions exploring land where there might not be a drop of oil? You'd be out millions. You especially wouldn't want to if there were sure things elsewhere!
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
yes, some people are so ignorant, how else would you explain this present administration? if the oil is too hard to get, why don't they give up some of the leases they are sitting on in order to gain more? that would at least make it seem like they were trying. and again any and all oil drilled domestically goes directly to the world oil market--while it may decrease prices slightly, no guarantee it will be used here in the US.
razberryberet 3 years ago
They can't gain additional land because the land they're leasing is the only land the Government will let them drill on. The governmentis not letting oil companies drill where there is oil.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
Nope, you can't be more wrong. They close refineries because there are so many government regulations on oil and the way they refine it. Getting the product to the refinery became too expensive for them to justify it. There is a direct correlation between the government regulating and restricting oil refinery and production and the amount the oil companies put out. The refineries in the U.S. are old and not as efficient because the government won't allow new ones to be built.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
I agree, we need to have other energy sources. But until we get those do you want to continue to pay $4.00 per gallon or would you like it to be less? Or at the very least put as much supply as we can into it so that we pay as little as possible? Obama stubbornly says no drilling. But again, logic says that we should drill while developing other energy sources so that the prive of gas stays as low as possible until we can tell OPEC to kiss out butts.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
Yes doofus, it is traded on the world market. And we are part of the world. Study the basic economic law of supply and demand and you'll learn that when the supply goes up the price goes down. Us contributing to the world supply would make it GO DOWN. This is really not that hard. I can't help you anymore. You need to get an education.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
Thank you for proving my point. Over taxation is the problem. The more the corporations are taxed, the less they can pay you and the more you are taxed the less you get. My point exactly. Thank you.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
You can't tax a country into prosperity. Bush didn't have anything to do with the economy. It's the market! You people need to learn basic economics. And the way that we get out of debt is by NOT SPENDING AS MUCH! Not by taking money out of the economy. Cut out all those wasteful programs like McCain is proposing instead of dreaming up new ways to tax the people's hard earned income.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
LOL. You can't even spell "lose" correctly. McCain did NOT say it would take 10 years. That was a liberal talking point until even Obama said recently it could happen in under 2 years. But he's not even saying that anymore because the oil companies have shown without doubt that they could have it to the pumps in less than 1 year. The only place it would take 10 years is AMWR in Alaska because they'd need another pipeline. Coastal drilling would put it at the pump in less than 1 year.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
The market runs the economy, not the government! We aren't a communist nation. We are a free market society. The reason the market went down is the high price of oil because it affects everything because everything has to be shipped. So it costs companies more to do business. If Obama was in office he would have taxed the companies and made it even worse. The reason gas went so high is because Democrats blocked drilling for more oil to increase the supply. Basic college economics teaches that.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
Pacific,
You've fallen for Obama's game. He plays word games with the different kinds of taxes the government burdens us with (Income tax, payroll tax, capital gains tax). The bottom line is that if you make 41000 or above you're taxes will go up in one of those areas. I don't know about you, but I don't care which pocket it comes out of--it's still the wasteful government taking my hard-earned money. Obama is a semi-communist who thinks the government should control the economy. Yuck.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
The Taxman Cometh
We must stop Obamanation
schooltrashers 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hey, how's that deregulation working out for you this week? keep up that republican agenda and we won't have to worry about paying taxes---we'll have nothing to tax! yay for Republican Fascism!
razberryberet 3 years ago
This jerk wants to take my money in the interest of "fairness" and for his social welfare programs. Fuck him. If this moron gets elected and raises capital gains it will drive people away from the market. What's the point of investing if you have to hand over almost 30% of what you make to the government?
gransasso22 3 years ago
The answer is for the government to SHRINK in size and stop coming up with new ways to spend money. The answer is not to take it out of our hide. Our government is far too overgrown and overfed. It needs to downsize. Obama wants it to grow in record amounts and we will have to pay for that out of our income. There's another word for that....communism.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
Every Republican president since and including Herbert Hoover has increased the federal government's size, scope, or power--and usually all three. Over the last one hundred years, of the five presidents who presided over the largest domestic spending increases, four were Republicans. Include regulations and foreign policy, as well as budgets approved by a Republican Congress, and a picture begins to emerge of the Republican Party as a reliable engine of government growth.
Is Bush a commie?
razberryberet 3 years ago
Not Reagan!
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are NOT entitled to your own facts: The number of workers on the federal payroll rose by 61,000 under Reagan. (By comparison, under Clinton, the number fell by 373,000.)
razberryberet 3 years ago
Active-duty US troops give Obama SIX TIMES as much money as McCain.
McCain smells like George W Bush.
Smells BAD...
shadywilder 3 years ago
Google McCain's first wife.
Mojojothanjo 3 years ago
Tell us oh Wise One, what is capital gains tax? Me no understand.
patriotfront 3 years ago
Way to prey on the ignorance of the American people. Do you even know what the "Capital Gains" tax is? Or who it would actually affect? Look into it.
joliara 3 years ago
UNLESS you make MORE the $250,000 Obama will not raise your taxes. UNDER $100,000 and you'll actually get a tax break. Repubs are for the wealthiest, they've tricked you into believing they are on YOUR side, then they laugh all the way to the bank.....
razberryberet 3 years ago
Why should anyone have their taxes raised based on what they earn? Why punish success? What if the government would just SPEND LESS and stop inventing new ways to spend money? No government has any business taking nearly 40 percent of someone's income and then taking sales tax, property tax, capital gains taxes (on 401 K, etc.). How can you be happy with the government taking half of your income only to waste it?
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
it should be fair/equal amount for all. CEOs shouldn't be allowed to make millions, get tax break and fail to pay their employees enough to afford health insurance--I end up paying for their insurance with my taxes and the CEOs make a bundle. I pay about 25% in taxes, which not a TON of money, but millionaires pay less than 1%?? Why should I be "punished" for lack of success?
How can you be happy with the "stimulus" check that was borrowed partially from China?
razberryberet 3 years ago
John McAnus wants to continue the tax cuts for millionaires. When he starts a war with Iran, who do you think is going to pay for it? McAnus is the real disaster.
VanadiusRex 3 years ago
Why should someone pay a higher percentage of their income just because they make more? If I work two jobs and you only work one should I have to pay 40 percent of my income while you pay 20? That's not fair. You've drunk the liberal kool aid that envies those who are successful and wants to punish them. Liberals want to insure that you will never get there because they will tax it out of you.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
REALCHRISTIANSINGLES come on are you serious. For your statement to bee true you would have to be making about a million dollars a year at both of your jobs. Please quit one and put in a good word for me at the other and while your at it maybe you could learn something about our tax system before you open your fucking mouth. That said vote Bob Barr the only true republican running. If your going to vote mccain watch these vids "mccain vs mccain" and "vietnam vet against mccain"
newcovertedchristian 3 years ago
Newconvert,
You don't know what you're talking about. If someone makes over 41,000 per year Obama said he would raise their taxes. And he'll raise it on anyone who has any investments. In fact, he'll double that tax rate. It doesn't matter what pocket it comes out of--he wants to take money away. I like Bob Barr too but he has no chance. But you really should have some grasp on the facts before saying I don't. My father is an accountant and we've talked extensively on taxes.
RealChristianSingles 3 years ago
McLame cheated on his wife and kids and had sex with another woman. ONCE A CHEATER ALWAYS A CHEATER. Do we want a cheater for president, what a disgrace that would be for USA to have a man with NO morals as a leader. Whats that saying to the world. If he would cheat on his OWN FAMILY what would he do to strangers like us? cant trust a cheater, once you cheat thats a BIG deal breaker right there. Cant vote for him, he no good to his OWN family, you think he's gonna care about yours?
shaggyjam 3 years ago
Google 'The Obama File'
cyberella 3 years ago
We've got McCain, you've got BO
cloudshe 3 years ago