@Chammy92243 Underlying geology is my guess. Rocks transmit the movement better that sand, so it would make sense that the granite makeup of the Sierras would transmit that movement better than the softer soils of the bay. Same would be saying water conducts electricity better than wood. Again, that's just my guess
@Armistice023 Actually, bedrock muffles the movement. Sand will amplify it. Being on a rock or boulder would be the safest place in an EQ, you will still feel it, but it wouldn't knock you over. Being on sand or even worse, landfill, it'll shake you harder and anything built on it will fall to pieces.
@Chammy92243 Because the fault is "unzipping" from north to south. If the EQ starts at the south of the fault, the shockwaves will go west. That's the the USGS guy told me when I asked the same question...
because it is. all the displacements are exaggerated or multiplied by 1000 - otherwise you wouldn't see ANYTHING happening. the video tries to show you the geographic distortions that would happen under those conditions.
Look This video shows that if the Hayward Fault goes off soon we might end up with the same problems as the People of Haiti had to face last week and the People of Eureka had to face the week before.
Note the exaggeration is 1000x. As to buildings, there are tens of thousands of building with either soft first stories, or are unreinvorced brick. Then the loss of power, communications, transportation due to road/bridge failures, landslides, traffic lights outages, plus the unknowns. Maybe a dam failure, airport runway damage. Will retrofits survive? It will be the worst American disaster in history.
7.0, though powerful, probably wouldn't do much to buidlings these days. Your grandma might yell at you for breaking her favourite tea set for years afterwards, but with modern earthquake area building regulations, the worse damage, in my opinion, would be cracked windows, tiles shaken off roofing and minor damage to roads...
Actually, the conservative estimates put a 7.0 quake on the Hayward fault as having major damage to the East Bay since the fault hasn't let go for a very long time. Most of the buildings here are not entirely retrofitted, since they were here before a lot of current regulations were in place. Trust me, I live less than a mile from the center of Downtown Oakland and we feel it when there's two or a three.
c'mon! there's no way that a 7.0 on the Hayward fault would look like this. Compare this simulation with that of the 1989 loma prieta simulation. That one was a 6.9 and it looked nothing like this.
89 Loma Prieta quake's depth of fault was over 10 miles deep I believe that lessen the strength of motion shaking. Hayward fault's simulation may look pretty severe because the fault would rapture right on surface rather than over 10 miles deep like Loma Prieta's quake.
I think if a 7.0 quake were to happen on the Hayward Fault or the New Madrid Fault in the Eastern Half of the USA. Then we all would have problems bigger than the victims of the 2010 Haiti Quake.
It has not happened yet. I believe that it could happen soon, but I hope that the ones who are at risk hang in there. I may not have any family members residing in California, but I care for them as well as the rest of the world.
And for the person with the profile "yeahduckies" I'm gonna tell ya. Yes, houses are sometimes completely destroyed and stuff like that in earthquakes.
im so terrified by earthquakes. but lots of people are. but if this hit lets say a random city...los angeles, would they be hit really badly that houses could collapse or stuff like that? i live in new york but i have family out in los angeles thats why im wondering
question. will san jose feel the massive 7.0 quake in a serious sense? or will it be reduced to like a 5.0 because of how far we our from the vaunt line in oakland?
Actually, since a good deal of the south bay is built on mud and sand, it is entirely possible that San Jose will be super hard-hit, regardless of shaking quotient.
where there is smoke there is fire. Weather modifying machines are real. Look up haarp. the reason for your preparation is because fema and the powers that be have already set it up to take place, you're just being desensitized. Wake up people, our lives are hanging in the balance. They know what's going to happen before it happens because they cause it. It's called genocide!
You guys realize that a 7.0 is 10x greater then a 6.0 and not doubled? So if it's a 7.5 it will be about 6 times greater then the loma prieta in strenth but since the loma prieta was 70 miles away from Oakland the quake will really be about 20x greater then 1989. What i don't get is why Oakland will suffer worst then Alameda. Alameda is like 30% landfill and marsh.
where did you get the impression i'm not calm dork? if a person post a video like this it should be in the video description. obviously not everyone is going to look at the fine print while watching the video.
back in 1989 i was standing in a large field (in vacaville, ca) about 60 miles east of the epicenter, you could see what looked like waves rolling across the field.
Kind of useless without a legible key.. I'm assuming that the red zone is basically obliterated? Honestly only idiots would build in this area after 1906..
Im moving out of Cali in 2 weeks. Hopfully it can wait that long before having a huge quake!
Zeronieo 10 months ago
why doesnt it go north ? the effect olny goes south....
maximme 10 months ago
Put on your hard hat and jump in your helicopter, quick!
Bugstomper2 11 months ago
Why are the waves heading South South East instead of upwards and West?
Chammy92243 1 year ago
@Chammy92243 Underlying geology is my guess. Rocks transmit the movement better that sand, so it would make sense that the granite makeup of the Sierras would transmit that movement better than the softer soils of the bay. Same would be saying water conducts electricity better than wood. Again, that's just my guess
Armistice023 1 year ago
@Armistice023 Actually, bedrock muffles the movement. Sand will amplify it. Being on a rock or boulder would be the safest place in an EQ, you will still feel it, but it wouldn't knock you over. Being on sand or even worse, landfill, it'll shake you harder and anything built on it will fall to pieces.
zapthycat 1 year ago
@Chammy92243 Because the fault is "unzipping" from north to south. If the EQ starts at the south of the fault, the shockwaves will go west. That's the the USGS guy told me when I asked the same question...
zapthycat 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola mexicali cuidado hay muchas replicas de la faya de san andres
chuchoabraham 1 year ago
But why does it say 1000x exaggeration?
ModestDanny 1 year ago
because it is. all the displacements are exaggerated or multiplied by 1000 - otherwise you wouldn't see ANYTHING happening. the video tries to show you the geographic distortions that would happen under those conditions.
antigen4 1 year ago
does anyone know which simulating programme was used for making this video?
cnselif 1 year ago
darn! i live in Newark CA and the violent is running right where I live!
Legomania81 1 year ago
Look This video shows that if the Hayward Fault goes off soon we might end up with the same problems as the People of Haiti had to face last week and the People of Eureka had to face the week before.
recto89 2 years ago
i live in richmond ca
Msshanibo808 2 years ago
watch this video is gonna get so commented on soon when the hayward fault does rupture. Hopefully we'll all still be alive to look back on it...
writofmandamus 2 years ago
Note the exaggeration is 1000x. As to buildings, there are tens of thousands of building with either soft first stories, or are unreinvorced brick. Then the loss of power, communications, transportation due to road/bridge failures, landslides, traffic lights outages, plus the unknowns. Maybe a dam failure, airport runway damage. Will retrofits survive? It will be the worst American disaster in history.
mmikemoore 2 years ago
i live on the hayward fault
jorniker 2 years ago
FUCK i live like right on da fucking fault
lmaoarandy 2 years ago
7.0, though powerful, probably wouldn't do much to buidlings these days. Your grandma might yell at you for breaking her favourite tea set for years afterwards, but with modern earthquake area building regulations, the worse damage, in my opinion, would be cracked windows, tiles shaken off roofing and minor damage to roads...
tectonaguy 2 years ago
Actually, the conservative estimates put a 7.0 quake on the Hayward fault as having major damage to the East Bay since the fault hasn't let go for a very long time. Most of the buildings here are not entirely retrofitted, since they were here before a lot of current regulations were in place. Trust me, I live less than a mile from the center of Downtown Oakland and we feel it when there's two or a three.
mayaantares 2 years ago
at least im not in the red area but fuck that shits guna suck ass wen it happens
ivegotamnesia 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We're going to fucking die.
MarioTheDawg 2 years ago
c'mon! there's no way that a 7.0 on the Hayward fault would look like this. Compare this simulation with that of the 1989 loma prieta simulation. That one was a 6.9 and it looked nothing like this.
neilutubename 2 years ago
simulations are known to change after 20 years of tech advancements
redisk 2 years ago
89 Loma Prieta quake's depth of fault was over 10 miles deep I believe that lessen the strength of motion shaking. Hayward fault's simulation may look pretty severe because the fault would rapture right on surface rather than over 10 miles deep like Loma Prieta's quake.
mrtokitime 2 years ago
I think if a 7.0 quake were to happen on the Hayward Fault or the New Madrid Fault in the Eastern Half of the USA. Then we all would have problems bigger than the victims of the 2010 Haiti Quake.
recto89 2 years ago
I'm waiting for it.
SnowVixen89 2 years ago
WHEN iS THiS SUPPOSE TO HAPPEN..i LiVE iN RiVERSiDE CA...DO yOU KNOW..??
green8o5 2 years ago
tommorrw
YouSmellProductions 2 years ago 2
It has not happened yet. I believe that it could happen soon, but I hope that the ones who are at risk hang in there. I may not have any family members residing in California, but I care for them as well as the rest of the world.
SnowVixen89 3 years ago
And for the person with the profile "yeahduckies" I'm gonna tell ya. Yes, houses are sometimes completely destroyed and stuff like that in earthquakes.
AdventureStudying 3 years ago
It is going to be so DANG sad!
AdventureStudying 3 years ago
One of these days, POW!! Right in the old kisser!
AdventureStudying 3 years ago
im so terrified by earthquakes. but lots of people are. but if this hit lets say a random city...los angeles, would they be hit really badly that houses could collapse or stuff like that? i live in new york but i have family out in los angeles thats why im wondering
yeahduckies 3 years ago
so that's the south bay . i live on the eastside of san jose. will that make much of a difference?
GeneralHospitalmob 3 years ago
question. will san jose feel the massive 7.0 quake in a serious sense? or will it be reduced to like a 5.0 because of how far we our from the vaunt line in oakland?
GeneralHospitalmob 3 years ago
Actually, since a good deal of the south bay is built on mud and sand, it is entirely possible that San Jose will be super hard-hit, regardless of shaking quotient.
septentrionale 3 years ago
where there is smoke there is fire. Weather modifying machines are real. Look up haarp. the reason for your preparation is because fema and the powers that be have already set it up to take place, you're just being desensitized. Wake up people, our lives are hanging in the balance. They know what's going to happen before it happens because they cause it. It's called genocide!
notdafn1 3 years ago
california is due for an massive earthquake
dietzchris 3 years ago 2
I know. That is what I've been trying to tell other youtubers who were making light of this. This is serious, dude!
SnowVixen89 3 years ago
So If I stay in Union City which is between Hayward and Fremont, would that put me in the "red" area or the danger zone?
Jodatoa 3 years ago
You guys realize that a 7.0 is 10x greater then a 6.0 and not doubled? So if it's a 7.5 it will be about 6 times greater then the loma prieta in strenth but since the loma prieta was 70 miles away from Oakland the quake will really be about 20x greater then 1989. What i don't get is why Oakland will suffer worst then Alameda. Alameda is like 30% landfill and marsh.
TheBohemianOwls 3 years ago
thats it im out....ima live in the middle of assia
hyphymex510 3 years ago
calm down, it says 1000x exxageration on the top of the screen, below M7.0 Earthquake Simulation
ig0tsh0t 3 years ago
where did you get the impression i'm not calm dork? if a person post a video like this it should be in the video description. obviously not everyone is going to look at the fine print while watching the video.
x11115 3 years ago
hahahahaha!!
nikidizzi2 3 years ago
not accurate. a small building might shake that much but not the entire land mass. if that happened everything would be leveled beyond comprehension.
x11115 3 years ago
Some of those USGS guys need some serious visualization assistance.
ImpliedBodyMan 3 years ago
I wish this won't happen again :)
penpen125 3 years ago
glad we don't have those in texas panhandle
psychodelicdragon 3 years ago
Glad we don't have tornadoes every year.
mmuskratt 3 years ago 2
wait wait ... wats the point of this vid... were ganna hav another, bigger earthquake soon?
vizarx 3 years ago
:20 so long Oakland
BeondaPale 3 years ago
Who ordered the burrito??
novan3 3 years ago
Does the earth actually ripple like that during a real earthquake? I gotta see a video of that.
theblackwidower 3 years ago
im no expert but i believe it does from vids i have seen
hurdl3thed34d 3 years ago
The article that this video is from says this:
"The ground motion is exaggerated by 1,000 to help with the visualization."
inthefade 3 years ago
.
back in 1989 i was standing in a large field (in vacaville, ca) about 60 miles east of the epicenter, you could see what looked like waves rolling across the field.
audiotactix 3 years ago 2
Kind of useless without a legible key.. I'm assuming that the red zone is basically obliterated? Honestly only idiots would build in this area after 1906..
neotoy 3 years ago
Yeah this video is pretty unclear, mainly because it goes along with this article:
blog(dot)wired(dot)com/wiredscience/2008/10/video-earthquak(dot)html
You'd think that Wired would know enough to include the link to the article in the video description...
inthefade 3 years ago
OMG its a sign .... Science Help us
bobbyyFc 3 years ago
wow nice effect it's as if it's bleading
987wolf987 3 years ago
wow.. we were doing about this just today :D
smnk3 3 years ago
cool
MiniMaxis468 3 years ago
1 uno
victorcelmare 3 years ago