Kill and Eat The Rich: a Precautionary Tale

[McMuffin752]

revolution is coming

[xXTedKnowsXx]

Eating the rich would be like eating swill fed hogs. It's garbage meat, and tastes like shit.

[shenmueso]

hoyl fuck, what a prediction!

[dml2211]

stay peaceful and real change can occur

[TheShagron]

Even from the grave capitalism would bite you in the ass(hee hee) there is a serious suply and demand issue here, there just wouldn't be enough rich guy parts to go around, unless you can get Jesus on board(another good example of a communist), he could just sub in dead rich guy into that bread and fishes thing he does, maybe even throw in some spiderman, now that's a fairy tale I could sign on to!

[JUSTTHETRUTHTV]

GET RID OF THE GOVERNMENT!

[Rand0mManic]

I guess the only people that need to worry about this video are the Rich, I ate a rich person and shat a rich smelling turd, there were no hard feeling, it's just business, you know.

[killerbandit]

Really great allegory. I look forward to you telling it again. You can polish it up, you know what I mean?

[bweazel]

Has anyone ever told you how much you sound like a Nazi... ecomonically? They hated capitalism too, they abolished all income not derived from work, they were socialists to the core. They hated wealthy people (in their case, Jews), you generalize that to all wealthy people though. You seem like a nationalist.....lots of similarities... if the shoe fits... ;)

[TheShagron]

@bweazel You do realize that the Nazis weren't communists right? You can't get much more right wing than Hitler, he loved capitalism, in fact he was so prized by the major business interests of the time that he was declared Time magazine's "Man of the year" in 1938. If you are going to work in hyperbole at least try get your "isms" right. Here just to help out with examples, Lenin(Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) and Trotsky(Lev Davidovich Bronshtein)maybe even Castro are good examples of Communists

[bweazel]

@TheShagron You have no idea what you're talking about.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel I know reading might be against your code or something, but look it up if you don't don't believe me. Political systems not withstanding(Democracy, Monarchy, Dictatorship etc. are political systems and are unrelated to the economic systems), I will give you the economics,the extreme right-wing is known as Fascism(Hitler, Mussolini, Franco) the extreme left-wing is known as socialism(Lenin,Castro, Chavez, Moa), Communism the stateless socialism evisioned by Howard Marx (see Commune)

[bweazel]

@TheShagron The people were socialists, their political system was socialist, ruled by one party, the national socialist (Nazi) party of Germany. Their economy was centrally controlled and you had vestige of property rights so long as you did exactly what the government wanted. The Nazi party was not a big supporter of religion. They supported abortion of any non-Arians, where exactly do these right-wing, conservative values come in to play? Socially or economically? Hmm?

[bweazel]

@TheShagron Maybe it would just be easier to ask you in what way you would like to define the national socialist party as capitalists or right-wing extremists. In what ways were they right wing?

[TheShagron]

@bweazel The Nazi platform which brought them to power was one of job creation, deregulation, and expansionism along with the abandonment of the treaty of versailles. An Anti-Communist movement, "national socialist" was added to The German Worker's Party(The Nazis) in 1920 in an attempt to draw support away from the strengthening Communist Party. When Hitler abandoned violent take over for political means his campaign and administration was entirely funded by business interests

[bweazel]

@TheShagron And how is any of that right wing to you? No, The German Worker's Party is not the Nazi party, bro. Like I've already said the word Nazi comes from National Socialist. The were the National Socialist Worker's Party. Stop leaving that very important part out. Still, I asked you how anything they did could be considered right wing, you managed to not answer that at all. Try again.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel I'm just trying to help you not look like an idiot (although you're making it hard), private enterprise flourished under the NAZI party, which is why the racist totalitarian aspects were tolerated. IBM, Coca-Cola and many other American (and international) companies continued to operate in Germany even after the war broke out. Please just look it up, I even sent you a link to the history channel's report on the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany, if you refuse to learn, I can't help

[bweazel]

@TheShagron I think calling what the Nazi's had private enterprise is laughable. I've asked you about three times now. This is the last time I will ask: How do you define right wing? And how were the Nazi's more right wing than they were left?

[TheShagron]

@bweazel Now I realize that denial is more than a river in Africa, but this is re-GodDamn-diculous.What precisely do you think right-wing means?Because that might help me explain it in a way you might understand. The businesses which operated under the Nazis were not publicly owned, but owned privately for profit. If you don't believe me, ask your local high-school history teacher, or any political science student. Or continue to look like a pitiably ignorant wretch I really don't care

[bweazel]

@TheShagron Bro, stop tugging on your own dick and just answer the very simple question. I've asked you about five times how you're defining it, and now you're asking me how I define it, again, just answer the very simple question. God damn... so now for the sixth time, you have completely ignored the question on how you (not a local high school teacher) would define the Nazi's as right wing. Answer the fucking question, what is right wing to you, and how do you consider Nazi's right wing?

[bweazel]

@TheShagron Ok, so they had an illusion of private property, so long as you did exactly what the government wanted, that's private to you? That's right-wing to you? Please, explain how. Having a real hard time seeing how this is any different from communism (aka. socialism), aside from the German nationalism. "Private" individuals affiliated with the party also gained benefits from being the person the State selected to run a nationalised entity, in the USSR. Doesn't make it private though.

[bweazel]

What I'm trying to show you, is that facsism and communism are practically one in the same. Your problem though, is you try to put facism on the right side of the spectrum, when it's not. It is right of communism, yes, but as most liberals do, they try to scoot it completely to the other side of the spectrum, without really explaining why they choose to do that. Fascism has much more to do with left-wing politics and economics than it does with right-wing.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel They call the extreme right-wing Fascist (and it's true Russia was closer to being fascist) because that's what the word means. What you are calling "left-wing" is just not, you are making terms synonymous that just aren't. Political groups behind both the leftist(most good for greatest number of people) and right-wing(Individualist free enterprise) can go horribly wrong. Not everything bad is left (or right for that matter), neither do the tactics of one government define it

[bweazel]

@TheShagron Russia was closer to being fascist? Now I've heard it all... I've They are both very far on the left side of the spectrum. Just because national socialism is a more conservative form of socialism, does not make it a right wing ideology, or even close to it.

And to you, fascism does not support the greatest good for the greatest number of people? That's exactly what it was, so long as you were German, hence, NATIONAL socialism.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel It basically just comes down to a simple choice, do you want to FEEL like you're RIGHT, or do you want to BE CORRECT. Socialism does not mean Dictatorship, any more than Capitalism means Democracy. One is a political system, the other an economic system. The British empire for example was a Capitalist Monarchy. Before CIA intervention, Chile was a Socialist Democracy. They're like bread and cheese, you might like both, but that doesn't make them synonymous

[bweazel]

@TheShagron It basically comes down to you answering the question I've asked six times now. Or are you going to keep avoiding it? How is Nazism more right wing than left? I never said it meant dictatorship. I said it means State control of the means of production, which it does and which the Nazi's had. Regardless if they were owned by "private" businessmen or not,

Ok, for the sixth time now, how... is... fascism... more... right... wing... than... left...

Seriously, explain yourself.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel The Nazis didn't control the means of production any more than the US government does, probably less. If they had been operating a bolshevik style communism, as you seem to be implying, the businesses(i.e.means of production) would not have been privately owned for ppersonal profit, they would have been state owned for (in theory) public benefit. They operated on the profit incentive, supply and demand economic model. They were passionately anti-communist, those are just the facts

[bweazel]

@TheShagron So long as you're doing what they wanted, no, they didn't interfere. Not really sure how you can't call that control. Probably less?! Oh holy shit.... and you call me in denial? And how exactly do you consider. They abolished all incomes not derived from work, and you want to play like the US is involved in its economy more than the Nazi's were? Get real. It had nothing to do with profit incentive, yes, profits existed, so long as what you did benefitted the State.

[bweazel]

@TheShagron Stop trying to play like the people and businesses were free to do what they wanted, they weren't. If they were free to do what they wanted, they could have gone against the governments wishes, seeing as they were not free to do what they wanted, not really sure how you could call them capitalists or even close to capitalists. The State, not capital and individual choice, set the goals for the economy. You are playing on words here to try to support your argument.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel Every government in existance for all of human history directed the economic systems under which they operated toward their perticular political goals, that is what an economic system is, a tool to manage a country's resources. And the US has an incredibly litigious interventionist government (especially historically), they just tend to intervene on the side of big business. just because a government prevents sedition does not make them leftist

[bweazel]

@TheShagron To behave as though the Nazi's were more capitalist than us and interfered less in their economy that we did, is just ridiculous and shows how desperate you are to prove your failed point. What does sedition have to do with this? I can't believe you are trying to argue that the Nazi's were more capitalist than the US at that time. Again, like I said the first time, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

[bweazel]

"that is what an economic system is, a tool to manage a country's resources" This right here shows you have no understanding what capitalism is. It's no wonder you're having such a hard time understanding what the Nazi's really were. Economies are just that, a group of people. Control is not necessarily a part of an economy. But, being the lefist liberal you are, I see how you'd have a tough time understanding what capitalism is if you believe all economies are managed economies.

[TheShagron]

extreme left=no one has two coats until everyone has one, extreme right=every man for themselves. Neither of these things has ever existed in their truest sense. Stalinist Russia was what's known as State-Capitalism, basically the people on top owned everything and everyone worked for them(If you are playing monopoly that's the end of the game), a true Socialism would mean that everyone owned everything equally, which would force it to operate on either in an anarchy or a democracy.

[bweazel]

@TheShagron In reality, that's always what it is, a small group of people own things (sometimes they are also the government, sometimes they aren't). It's a question of how much the government gets involved in the peoples lives. No, that's not what socialism means. I know that's what you bleeding hearts want it to mean, but that's not what it means. It means State control of the means of production, period. Stop trying to bring your utopia into this. This is about reality. Not your fantasies.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel I think you might be confusing Capitalism with Anarchy, the government can intervene in your daily life without intervening in the means of production, for example Censorship and laws governing what is considered lewd behavior, how is not being aloud to swear on television or walk around naked have to do with the means of production? And I'm a rational moderate thank you very much, what strategy you use for a given issue should be determined on a case by case basis.

[bweazel]

@TheShagron I have nothing else to say to you, since you obviously cannot stay on topic. You have set up so many straw men it's getting a bit crowded in here, if you'd like to take them all down though, I'd be glad to continue. Let me help: How are the Nazi's more right-wing than they were left-wing? If you do not answer this directly, this is the last thing I have to say to you. Peace.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel they just weren't leftists, Hitler actually had the small leftist contingent of the Nazi party killed. You are simply confusing economic systems with social and political systems. And I was giving you the idealised fairy tale version of socialism, which, much like the fairy-tale version of capitalism, requires people to be self-governing. But clearly you are not going to learn the history or the semantics, so please continue on your ignorant way

[TheShagron]

@bweazel That is some pretty impressive hypocracy, coming from the guy who calls anyone who disagrees with them nazis, (maybe the most cliched straw man ever)

[bweazel]

@TheShagron *face palm* You make my head hurt, man. I can't believe I just saw the words anarchy and socialism used in the same sentence. Hah. I've known, by the way you've been talking, that you have no idea what capitalism is, but now it's getting pretty clear you don't even have any idea what socialism is. How the hell do you expect to have State control of the means of production.... without a State? That entire philosophy is a sham.

[bweazel]

@TheShagron Anyways, we've gone way off topic, and seeing as you still haven't answered the simple question of how the Nazi's were more right wing that left, I'll take my leave of you. Peace.

[TheShagron]

@bweazel "Leftists... claim that human development flourishes when individuals engage in cooperative, mutually respectful relations that can thrive only when excessive differences in status, power, and wealth are eliminated."-Barry Clark. I might be crazy but that doesn't sound like nazis to me. I think you maybe just don't know what left-wing means, so until you feel like learning, please continue with the Mccarthyist drivel

[TheShagron]

@bweazel Those who don't learn from the mistakes of history are doomed to repeat them (history.co.uk/encyclopedia/na­zi-party)here this might help

[TheShagron]

@bweazel Trust me, books are your friend, throw caution to the wind and try reading a few (WARNING!: READING MAY LEAD TO CRITICAL THINKING AND ACCURATE INFORMATION, SOME EXTREME CASES HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO LEAD TO CHANGE OF OPINION AND/OR DISILLUSIONMENT)

[bweazel]

@TheShagron Then please, if you've read so much on the topic, answer my simple question. In what ways were the national socialists of Germany, right wing?

[bweazel]

What's this whole deal with "our" jobs? I hear you say that a bunch. I'm curious how you claim something that you did not create. That's my whole problem with the leftist philosophy. Entitlement. It appears that most leftists I've talked to believe they are entitled to lifetime job security, and that the owners of the business are somehow bound to them regardless of what the workforce produces or demands. It's a very one sided philosophy that degrades anyone with any wealth or ability to invest

[JUSTTHETRUTHTV]

@bweazel PEOPLE WITH JOBS AND A FAIR WAGE DON'T NEED ENTITLEMENTS.

[bweazel]

@JUSTTHETRUTHTV So... what're you saying? Get rid of the entitlements?

[JUSTTHETRUTHTV]

WITH OUT REAL CHANGE WE KEEP ON GOING DOWN THE SAME ROAD WE ARE STILL GOING DOWN!!!

[satinbarbi]

@bweazel Let's see what you say when your job is gone and you are hungry and homeless.

[grungeface87]

Want me one of those t-shirts.

[MashCarl]

Dude, normalize your audio. Please. Shoot me a message if you have any other questions.

[mistuhDavecash]

Cool story bro.

But technically, it's called cannibalism.

[schafbo]

YEAH BRO DOWN WITH ADOBE AND COMPAQ

[marniespeaks]

this story needs animation and a little more salt

[55ella2007k]

What Obama is doing is a f*cking travesty. Nonetheless, the rich will be long gone before the AMERICAN peasants wake up. They 'll be living on their private islands in GREECE, complete with their private navy and other mercenaries...

[austin99203]

That's a fucking sick shirt! I will be ordering one.

[RickyMcGinnis]

Your mustache makes you look like a Civil War general, which is very badass.

[CredoVeritas]

The U.S. Inc. has been "just business" since 1871 - the business of folding all under the wing of government. Most see red republican elephants and blue democrat donkeys but for those who take time to think for themselves and avoid MSM regurgitation, it's quite clear that ALL are no longer "of the people" but now well "above the people". Your business is managed almost exclusively by a parasitic, wealthy, executive elite who conjure benefits for the debt and indenture of you, the rabble.

[ridewave444]

Great video. Well said.

[zigzigerblat]

That would be nice but unfortunately the universe doesn't work that way. In the end the poor killed and ate each other while the rich escaped in helicopters behind tall high voltage walls with machine gun turrets and private security forces a la Haliburton, KBR and Black Water. Why do you think they got in that business in the first place? Control the oil, control the wars, control the people when they turn on you.

[ThePunkPatriot]

@zigzigerblat Stalinist Russia's occupation of Ukraine proves your version to be true. However, I wanted to offer an alternative ending that was a little more empowering.

[zigzigerblat]

@ThePunkPatriot There is only one hope and only one issue. Raise Taxes on the rich. The conservatives have a spearhead, that is lowering taxes and calling class warfare. The left needs to embrace class warfare and openly, proudly call for tax increases. There should be no other issue discussed. Do not deny it, go for the throat and relate every debate back to raising taxes. Shut it down and have one programed talking point. Out Republican the Republicans. That is how we eat the rich.

[pr0t0typeB0Y]

@ThePunkPatriot I do prefer the empowering ending, but the question remains, when we decide to fight, how can we prevent their flight. Great vid!

Peace.

[battousaiashe]

Yeah...now it's a moral imperative that I buy one of your eat the rich t-shirts once the fall semester starts. Can you get tall sizes?

[lamaddussa]

figuring out how to create a functioning democracy, or some kind of revolution, & then distributing the wealth of the rich to the population & condemning the rich to a grim life of hard labor would be better. as it is, the government is far too well armed, & its mandate is far too focused on protecting the interests of the wealthy for this fable to bear any relation to reality. knowing how the human beast functions, the poor are much more likely to kill & eat one another.

[doctordude]

Words of wisdom you fuckin' punk. Words of wisdom.

[junior00bacon00chee]

the divide isn't rich vs. poor it's the extorted vs. the state. the revolving door between government and wall street requires that kind of analysis to really understand the causes of our problems, IMO.

i give you a lot of shit, at least kudos for not blocking me, i'll give you that. and you have a sweet mustache of which i am jealous cause i can't grow one. i think if you want to help the poor you have to understand the causes of poverty, which requires an understanding of economic science.

[ThePunkPatriot]

@junior00bacon00chee I have no issue with people disagreeing. The only people I have ever blocked were making threats towards other YouTubers, or spamming the comments with insults. If you have ideas that I disagree with, and you'd like to articulate them, that's fine, more power to you.

[TheRocketMartin]

I want a shirt man...! can i?

[ThePunkPatriot]

@TheRocketMartin You can.  Go to the website listed at the end.

[TheRocketMartin]

@ThePunkPatriot  thank you

[balaalalaslk]

That should be a comic book

[TreachMarkets]

Do you distinguish between people who get rich by inventing something useful and valuable to others and people who get rich through corporatism, war profiteering, our rigged banking system, and other state-backed scams?

[ThePunkPatriot]

@TreachMarkets No. That would be nuance. This is a precautionary fable, which requires broad strokes of a fictional brush. I also don't distinguish between the various types of poor people.

[TreachMarkets]

@ThePunkPatriot Okay..... Personally I wouldn't lump Haliburton executives in with the guy who invented ShamWow, As far as the poor, I also wouldn't lump struggling hardworking people in with flat broke meth addict convenience store robbers. But whatever slogan that would result in wouldn't be as catchy as 'Kill The Rich'.

[serendipitous123321]

i just bought the PP logo shirt! :D

[ThePunkPatriot]

@serendipitous123321 I just filled out your order form!

[serendipitous123321]

@serendipitous123321 woah! you should make stickers so i can slap them all over tha place while i skate and at school.

[Iker888]

yummy

[AmsterdamHeavy]

you need 2x shirts....

[ThePunkPatriot]

@AmsterdamHeavy Just created a 2XL listing.

[AmsterdamHeavy]

@ThePunkPatriot thank you sir, I ordered 2

[primoknoxville]

So you are a business man.

[ThePunkPatriot]

@primoknoxville If businessman you mean, "person who works all the time and still barely supports themselves" then yes.

[skeletonmom]

Punk, instead of t-shirts, have you thought of putting that on aprons?

[ThePunkPatriot]

@skeletonmom OH my dear goodness. That is BRILLIANT.

[ThePunkPatriot]

@skeletonmom I just ordered blank canvass aprons to print on.  Thank you for the idea!

[Airphel]

@ThePunkPatriot Humm... If I work a few extra hours behind my forklift I should be able to afford one of those babies... I joke, but sadly its true, I want one but I'm broke :( Willing to make a trade of some sort?

[skeletonmom]

@ThePunkPatriot - Most certainly welcome! Let me know when they go on sale. :D

[PropheciesofWar]

Awesome



[teamhunley]

Great, for us who like the really baggy look, please make an XXL!

[ThePunkPatriot]

@teamhunley Okay okay!

[rataMacue22]

Almost time for din-din!