Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (121)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Both thermite and thermate leave aluminum oxide as one of there main biproducts. What was not found I the dust? You guessed it- aluminum oxide!

  • @PostalCode74

    Did not even watch the video? The aluminum oxides disperses in the air. It doesn't clump to gether with initially liquid residues.

  • @citizenfor911truth1 That's a pretty wild claim that ALL of the aluminum oxide (AKA corundum) would blow away. There would still be a considerable amount left. But NONE was found!

  • Dr Jones.. didn't he write a paper saying Jesus Christ visited America?

  • @gooconnection

    You ask quite a lot of "why ifs" and "what about thats." Why not address the actual science in this discussion?

  • Iron sphreres debunked at the bottom of this link. Nice try though. Keep looking.

    debunking911(dotcom)/jones(dot­)htm

  • @MrBoredatwork

    I've already seen that link. I address several of those points in my video.

  • Also, your 5.87% estimation is what is expected in a normal office, the extra percentage more than likely came from the crushe concrete. we know from the paper that there were several different samples with different chemical breakdowns. It also makes one think, if it was a "militarized" weapon you'd think it would be uniform, but what can you expect from Jones and his cronies

  • One point I'd like to make is that these were "iron-rich", and even though they might contain Fe Al O etc...There's a big difference in how they are chemically brought together. I think we can all agree that there's a big difference in OH- and H20, but using Harrit's and Jones' research and methods they would say these two things were the same. The method used by Harrit et al was complete crap. Plus, you're forgetting one thing. Iron-rich spheres were expected, and should be abundant.

  • is this some kind of joke? your still going off what steven jones says even though he's been disproven over and over? he has know background to even comment on "spheres" or whatever else he says...hell his own department and colleges dont even agree with him

  • @Zero2Legend

    Sorry, how has he been disproven? Does he not have three papers in peer-reviewed journals regarding his theories? What exactly is wrong in my video?

  • @citizenfor911truth1 can you provide a link to where his papers were peer reviewed?

  • @Zero2Legend

    Absolutely. I'll send them to you directly.

  • @citizenfor911truth1 no im not referring to the one by that author but by orionsyndicate

  • @Zero2Legend

    Could you please send that video to me?

  • @citizenfor911truth1  /watch?v=g31fCSYTtuc&feature=r­elated

  • @citizenfor911truth1 ok i saw your links, and one thing that bothers me is the bentham peer reviewed paper. thunderfoot and his friend dprjones submitted there own paper titled C.R.A.P. which was actually a lot of meaningless dribble and didnt make any sense...just a mockery of a paper and bentham accepted the paper saying that it was peer reviewed and accepted and that they should send them money as soon as possible so it can be published. they withdrew it because there point was made...

  • @Zero2Legend

    I can tell you have a lot of problems with Steven Jones work. I see this a lot. However, every problem you have has already been addressed. Again, for the sake of thoroughness I'll send you links that address every one of these problems: The peer review, the "CRAP" paper, thermate components in the debris, and how they could have planted explosives in the buildings.

  • @Zero2Legend Steven jones has been shown to comment that thermate debris was found in the ground zero area. the chips he found had substances that could be found in thermate sure, but alsoi could be found in the world trade center itself such as iron. the fact that he says thermate material was found....is odd to me because thats really the only thing he could find with that would fit with the materials he found there...aqnd there is no proof that explosives were used or is there any proof that

  • @Zero2Legend explosives were put in the building in the first place. yes there was a power outage, but to put that much explosive material in the building in the first place would take more than a day and a half...atleast the VERY least longer than that. i contend that thermate can weaken steel, no one is saying that it cant, but how was it put in there in the first place? thats my problem

  • @citizenfor911truth1 also, a video has already debunked yours. i suggest you look it up and see for yourself where you went wrong

  • @Zero2Legend

    If you are refering to the video by RKOwens4, this video was made in response to debunk it. If it is some other video, please direct me to it.

  • ONE OF TWO THINGS ARE HAPPENING - EITHER THERE ARE LOTS OF PAID DEBUNKER'S ON YOUTUBE OR THE MASS OF THE US PUBLIC ARE NOT EDUCATED ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THIS LEVEL OF SCIENCE! TO THE REST OF US,,, ITS QUITE BASIC! THIS IS WHY 911 IS KNOWN AS A HOAX THROUGH OUT THE REST OF THE WORLD AND WHY THE USA IS NOW VIEWED AND SPOKEN ABOUT DIFFERENTLY THESEDAYS! ITS SO SAD!!

  • debunker nuts are enemies of the people of the USA. Who let them in? They weren't supposed to get in. 9/11 was an inside job. Debunker nuts should be put in jail for supporting domestic terrorism and hating america the way it was intended. Feels like the movie 'Mr. Smith goes to Washington.'

  • #lol #fail

  • Very good Un-debunk.

  • Thermite and Thermate are just the most ignorant thing

    proposed by the internet wierdos going by 9/11 Truthers.

    Iron Microspheres are common anywhere there is an

    ancient or modern volcano, a mountain range, or a river.

    New York City has all three.

    The entire WTC complex was built in a BENTONITE clay

    "bathtub" to keep out the river. What's bentonite clay?

    Iron and aluminum and granite particles in nano and micron

    sized particles. Manhattan had a pottery industry based on it.

  • @Merlin5x5

    Your explanation might work, except for the fact that I pointed out in my video that the spheres were found in dust away from the site and there was a disproportionate amount of spheres in the dust.

  • @citizenfor911truth1

    My explanation works, because I pointed out that the whole

    region has these iron microspheres. ANYWHERE near the

    hudson river, which flows from New Yorks IRON mountains.

    (Adirondacks)

    Manhattan Island was a source for exactly this kind of clay,

    and it was the reason New Amsterdam was settled there.

    Microspheres are formed when lava is blown out into the air,

    as they were at the start of the Ad-iron-dacks.

  • @Merlin5x5

    No, because both RJ Lee and USGS stated that the spheres specifically came from the WTC buildings. The spheres Dr. Jones found specifically came from dust samples that were from the WTC. Also, the chips of unreacted thermite discovered, when ignited, produce the exact same types of spheres. There is no evidence they came from anywhere else but the WTC.

  • @citizenfor911truth1

    That's an outright LIE, there is NOTHING in the USGS report that

    says the microsphere's were from the WTC, but there IS a

    mention that they could come from the WTC environment.

    The spheres Steven Jones found, when ignited, snapped and

    could not be found, that's on page 22. I called the phone number

    on the report, and spoke to the man himself.

  • @citizenfor911truth1

    Have you ever actually read the USGS and RJ LEE report?

    They both claim over 10,000 TONS of FE enriched

    microsphere samples are on the WTC site, about 100

    TIMES the weight and volume of the 100 TONS Neils Harrit

    claims are needed for WTC demolition.

  • @citizenfor911truth1 No, actually, they didn't.

    They said the WTC dust profile came from

    the WTC. The USGS estimated 10,000 TONS

    of fe rich micron sized particles on the WTC site.

    How does 100 TONS of thermite become 10,000

    tons? because it was always there at 4%, and

    the WTC concrete dust added another 3%.

    No super thermites, or nibiru aliens needed

  • @citizenfor911truth1

    That's not true, as confirmed by every demolition expert in the United States and NIST.

  • @AlexanderTheGood89

    Care to explain? You're quite vague in your appeals to authority, which is the worst kind of appeal to authority.

  • @citizenfor911truth1

    "Care to explain?" Care to explain your explanation of exactly what happened on 9.11? You can't because your theory is disjointed in logic and you clearly have a crippled epistemology. All you do is make baseless and blanket statements like: "Ask questions," "That's been refuted," [By NON-PEER REVIEWED JUNK SCIENCE] or "You're just appealing to authority..."

    It's good to ask questions, but you can't ignore the answers when their provided.

    BTW, I work for the government.

  • @AlexanderTheGood89 oh you work for the gov? i have colonels in my family, and it is not the gov write large that did 911. it is a select few, clearly with key players in the highest levels. i suggest you stick to the facts, and sincerely investigate the HARD EVIDENCE and amazingly numerous questions which INDICATE a false-flag operation. the biggest over-step was demo of WTC7 (likely a command center). of course, these are key power players, and each had different ends/profits from the event.

  • @AlexanderTheGood89 BTW i am a biomedical engineer, with a masters, and familiar with all the basics of the nano-thermite paper; more studies would be confirmatory. you say you work for the gov... what is your job there? it seems you would be shaken to the core were 9/11 to have been an inside job. have you ever admitted to yourself it is possible? or are you just on a mentally self-protective rampage to try to shoot down evidence, often disingenuously? or is it part of your job to do this?

  • @citizenfor911truth1Oh, yes, Dr. Jones. Jones is convinced that Jesus was wandering through ancient Mexico around AD 600, paying calls on various Mayan villagers. He has published "evidence" that the Mayans were well aware of the "resurrected Lord" centuries before the Spanish priests crossed the Atlantic. And, for the past 10 years, Professor Jones has also been trying to sell Third World countries a solar funnel cooker based on the highly disputed scientific theory of cold fusion.

  • @AlexanderTheGood89

    Again, your attacking his religious beliefs in an attempt to discredit his scientific expertise. Now you are committing the fallacy of poisoning the well. "By NON-PEER REVIEWED JUNK SCIENCE" So apparently the JEM didn't publish three papers from members of the movement? You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.

  • @Merlin5x5 Great facts being presented all around. I've got questions across the board myself and it is purely fact based debates such as these that will help everyone arrive at the truth. Point, counterpoint, counter-counterpoint, etc. The rabbit hole goes quite deep!

  • @Somedude069 The thing that skepticism is supposed to produce is investigation. What's amazing is how little the 9/11 Truth Movement investigates, how little they are blowing up into a giant conspiracy. LOL Why would a giant conspiracy be needed to create an Arab Jihadist attack on the US when it's been happening for 40 years, since the US backed Israel in the 1968 war? When they attacked the Olympics? When they assassinated Robert Kennedy? It's NOT a new thing, is it?
  • @Merlin5x5 you are are a total dunce.

    Do you honestly believe thermite could be mistaken for clay by a scientist?

    and then peer reviewed and they all make the same mistake?

    Carry on in your dream world but you are getting totally outnumbered as more and more evidence is released through the freedom of information act.

    A lot of the suppressed evidence is finally coming out and it totally contradicts the official theory.

  • @zenoist2

    Actually, I think thermite IS a metalic clay, dumbass.

    Which peer review has the TRUTHER LAB report been through?

    The Open BENTHAM peer review process of cashing the check?

    Why do you think Steven Jones, Neils Harrit, et al, found the EGYPTIAN

    office of Open Bentham to accept it? And TWO EGYPTIAN science

    editors for Open Bentham RESIGNED over it?

    From the desire to be Peer Reviewed?

    OR the desire to hide from Peer Review?

  • @zenoist2 Here is the "Research" I did on the 9/11 Thermite report. Let's see if you match it. 1. I downloaded the report from Open Bentham. 2. I read the report. 3. I read the FRONT COVER, where the LAB (S&J Scientific) it's address, and phone number are recorded. 4. I called up PROVO, UTAH 411. NO S&J Scientific. 5. I called up PROVO, UTAH CITY BUSINESS LICENSE. A business license was bought, not recorded, no DBA filing. 6. I looked up the BOX number, it's a UPS MAILBOX. FLAKEY
  • @zenoist2

    SO FAR, STEVEN JONES as spent $25 on a license, and bought a $20 UPS Mailbox for his LABORATORY. I am thinking, "Total flim flam, as usual."

    SO,

    7. I call the PHONE NUMBER on the cover of the report. 801-735-5885

    It's a cell phone kept by a semi-retired CHEM professor at BYU, who only answers in the evening. I speak to the man. He is a nice guy, and borrows chem equipment from BYU on an "honor" basis. HIS PICTURE is on page 22, working in his garage.

    THIS is "S&J Scientific".

  • @Merlin5x5 ive given up replying to idiots who have their head up their ass and who swear blind black is white if the government tells them to.

    From now on you will not be answered and will be ignored.

    Ill merely keep posting unassailable facts that totally contradict the officiial theory bullshit.

    Much like other people I guess

    Through freedom of information act a lot of suppressed evidence is finally coming to light.

  • @zenoist2

    LMAO, Want the PHONE NUMBER to the Imaginary

    STEVEN JONES LABORATORY?

    7. I called the PHONE NUMBER on the cover of the report. 801-735-5885.

    CALL THEM YOURSELF, KOOKTARD.

  • @zenoist2

    What's amazing is how simple and cheap it was to fool you.

    $25 for a business license, $20 for a UPS Mailbox.

    Steven Jones and Neils Harrit have made THOUSANDS

    of CD sales and Profitted handsomely from a $50 investment.

  • @Merlin5x5 SO FAR, YOU have trolled for 1000s of hours.

    Merlin5x5 - tracked 4226 posts on 126 videos | 24 hours: 29 | 48 hours: 59 | 72 hours: 94 | 1 week: 174

    Need I say more?

  • @TrutherD1

    I have been a member since 2007. 29 posts in 24 hours equals about ONE hour per day, (2 minutes a post)

    SO, tell us how your THOUSANDS of hours gets pulled out of your ass?

  • @Merlin5x5 That's for you to determine.  Good luck, noob-agent

  • @TrutherD1

    Hmmmm, can't defend your claims?

    Yup, you are a Truther, all right.

  • @zenoist2 Now, could you please explain how I LIVE in a DREAM WORLD. When I challenged the most basic facts, and you did not? Now, HERE IS THE KICKER. NOBODY has been able to get the same dust, show the same gray/red paint chips, or present ANY analysis of ANY DUST from the WTC (There are 3 Dust Repositories NYU, FEMA, NIMH) that shows thermite residue of ANY kind, including 3 FRENCH TRUTHER attempts. Here is my conclusion. The Paper is a FRAUD. Plenty of evidence for it.
  • @Merlin5x5 I love how debunkers IGNORE IGNORE IGNORE AND DENY DENY DENY THAT

    IN TACT NANO THERMITE UNDETONATED was found. Screw the iron sphere argument, tell me how Thermite appears naturally ? Now if you don't believe there was thermite or Harrit/Jones aren't credible, that's another story and respectable opinion, but don't debunk something and IGNORE THE MAJOR PART of what you're debunking.

  • @psynema

    NOT Hardly. RED / GRAY chips were ONLY found in steven jones handled samples.

    There are THREE PUBLIC repositories of WTC dust.

    NO ONE has ever found Red / Gray chips in a PUBLIC source.

    The conclusion is obvious, Steven Jones has made a fool of you.

    Doubt me?

    PICK UP your phone, dial 411, and ask for "S&J Scientific", in Provo, Utah.

    That's the LAB on the cover of the Truther thermite report.

    IT DOESN'T EXIST.

    The address is a UPS store Mailbox, Dumbshit.

  • @psynema

    OK, Let's review.

    1. Nobody can find the undetonated NT in PUBLIC WTC DUST.

    2. Nobody can duplicate the truther lab results. (see #1)

    3. The thermite LAB doesn't exist in Provo.

    (It's a semi retired BYU professor in SLC, his PIC is on page 22)

    4. FE rich microspheres existed on Manhattan since New Amsterdam days.

    It's called Bentonite clay, and the WTC was built with it.

    5. Lightweight concrete uses fly ash, and fly ash, has iron microspheres.

    Anything else?

  • @Merlin5x5

    1. The government has refused to test their own samples of dust.

    2. 911debunkers(dot)blogspot(dot)­com(slash)2010(slash)03(slash)­sounds-of-loud-and-clear(dot)h­tml

    3. They've still tested the material. Why does it matter where they test it?

    4. Bentonite was only used in the construction of the bathtub, not the actual buildings.

    5. The iron constituents in fly ash are oxides rather than elemental iron.

  • @citizenfor911truth1 1. The government doesn't have the WTC dust samples. Two colleges (NYU and Cambridge) and the CDC (center for disease control), which is an independent agency. 2. LMAO, you are using a conspiracy site to prove a conspiracy? 3. It matters that they LIED to fabricate a LABoratory. 4. Then Bentonite was used to create the ground soil at the WTC. the original soil was deposited at Battery Park. 5. The iron in concrete would be sintered and spalled. Fires, remember?
  • @Merlin5x5

    1. The government does have its own samples. And did these other agencies look for these red/gray chips?

    2. Didn't hear any refutation there.

    3. A lab can be anywhere you conduct science experiments.

    4. Still wasn't used in the actual buildings.

    5. Yes, possibly in the 6 or 8 floors on fire. But that's out of 110 floors.

  • @citizenfor911truth1 1. OF COURSE the government has their own samples, but they are NOT the public samples of WTC Dust. 2. Because you can't usea conspiracy to prove a conspiracy. 3. No, actually, it can't. The whole point of a LAB is a controlled environment. 4. The WTC building went SIX floors underground. 5. SIX or eight floors would create TONS of fine, nano particles. More than enough. WE are talking about nano particles, and a change of 0.4%, remember?
  • @psynema These debunkernuts are ENEMIES. Many are either paid as debunkers, or else they are ex-military loyalists of some sort. They mistakenly place the "machine" of gov't above the will of the people. Therein lies their corruption. 9/11 was an inside job.

  • keep up the great work!

  • So it seems random, unsupported assertions are enough to convince people that debunkers are wrong. Cool story, bro.

  • @themoplainslife

    That's great. Now how about some actual refutation instead of petty insults.

  • @themoplainslife

    That's great. Now how about some actual refutation instead of petty insults.

  • .Why the comparison of dust samples found in the dust to paint chips soaked in paint thinner burning.What remains from the chip would be steel..It would have been better to ignite it in vacumn,if it was thermite it would burn because it would free up the oxygen needed to burn.if it was paint it would never burn..

  • Thank you for getting this out there for people (debunkers) who are still confused in regards to thermite/thermate and of course nano-thermite.

  • gr8 job once again!!!

  • It's great to see the improvement. Thumbs up

  • every LAME "debunking attempt" casually DEBUNKED...that's the problem 9-11 debunkernuts....debunking THE TRUTH..must be bloody hard-work...and in the end...it ALWAYS gets revealed...making you "debunkernuts" look fu*king S T U P I D.

    if you'd like to finally like to enjoy some measure of debunking success...feel free to JOIN US, in the REAL TRUTH movement...and start debunking Alien EnTITy1 and RKOwens vids...

    ..it's actually VERY easy.

  • @homerbear46 that Alienentity fella blocked me twice lol

  • @mooners40 ....lol...I hear that from a LOT of people these days.....

    there must be a "bug" going around!

    :-)

  • @mooners40 hey moontard... seems like you get blocked alot. Something to do with the fact that you're a retarded twat perhaps?

  • @terrymanning1 TROLL

  • @terrymanning1 he blocked me because he couldn't handle me making him look a twat - and you? I called you out several times and you tell me you're a 6' 4" judo guy - lol - you're a sad fat bald liar on the dole in your adopted parents sitting room and you're a pussy - I'd never tire of bitch slapping you - lmao - you idiot - you have a blocking fetish - maybe it's coz all pussies you've encountered have blocked you on account of your fucked up face and smell - reminding you of yer ma

  • @mooners40 mooners you're a retarded prick. Drop dead.... no-one would find you for weeks though. Not until the stink emanating from your bedsit hovel began to piss the scumbag fellow lowlifes in your block off.

  • @terrymanning1 you're so retarded you've no idea how retarded you are - you think that Oswald shot JFK and that wtc7 was an inferno and that wtc7 fell in 18 seconds - that's all proof for anyone with a brain - rofl - you fuckin twat

  • @mooners40 Retardation is a speciality of trooftard scum like you.

    Anyone with eyes can see the truth when the evidence is presented without deceit, which is something trooftard morons like you never do.

    All you have moontard os a bunch of debunked crap that no-one believes... except fellow fuckwits like you.

  • @terrymanning1 i notice you have debunked zero of the points in this series of vids - good job fuckwit lol- maybe that should tell you something

  • @mooners40 fuck off and die slowly moontard

  • @homerbear46

    Yeah, it is very easy to make up a conspiracy and post it on the internet without peer review or even a simple two-sided approach. Do you have an article that has been peer reviewed by a major university on 9/11 being an Inside Job? No.

    Here, I'll show you your own style of argument and line of reasoning: 9/11 was an inside job not by the American government, but by the Canadian government to draw the U.S. into Iraq and incease the value of the loonie.

    ..That was easy!

  • @AlexanderTheGood89

    The Truth Movement currently has six papers in peer-reviewed journals, with three of them being in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

  • @AlexanderTheGood89 ..nah...it was just "lame"

    :)

  • @homerbear46

    "Do you have an article that has been peer reviewed by a major university on 9/11 being an Inside Job? No."

    In other words, do you have any credible evidence to actually "debunk the debunkers" (which is a double negative, anyway)? No.

    Your unconstructive comment, which lacks any seriousness and hence any validity, merely contributes to proving my point.

  • @AlexanderTheGrub still lame the old "where's your peer review?" bullshit (yawn) LMFAO WTF is this 2007? R U one of the "noobie" shills? :) ITs difficult to get a conspiracy perpetrated BY a system proven THROUGH that system we might NOT have a "peer-reviewed paper" but what we do have is 1400 architects & Engineers supporting us. How many do u have? Shylam Shunder the babbling bumbler? LMFAO if u'd like me to spend the next 4weeks destroying ur pathetic disinfo tactics I'll be quite happy :)
  • @homerbear46

    You're a joke. That list of 1400 architects & engineers is a joke, it only contains a few structural engineers and mostly students who haven't even earned their degrees yet. You are probably not on the list, because I assume from your style of argument that you are not in engineering school. You're movement has produced no credible support and no evidence whatsoever over the last ten years. Your theories have been defeated over and over and here you keep going. Sad and funny.

  • @AlexanderTheGrub...OH so they're ALL students now?.....LOL, "it's a joke" (and still will be when it's 2000 I guess?)...I love how shills do this...spit out the retort of a BEATEN CHILD, then start bitching about how the other person's "style" is un-intellectual and unworthy of their response, make some vague suggestions that U R obviously NOT an engineer or "expert" (again INSINUATING they R)

    Then make some sweeping statement about how our theories have all been "debunked"

    Sad & funny.

  • @homerbear46

    Whatever. Your ignorance, and the ignorant assumptions of all other truthers, is the longest running joke in international politics. You obviously maintain no understanding of political institutions, the scientific method, or the English language. Your evidence is circumstantial, and you rely on testimony taken out of context, or from traumatized victims of terrorist attacks. Then when called out on your absurd lies, you laugh. This is not entertainment. You're sick minded.

  • @homerbear46

    Oh, by the way, if the peer review process is a part of the "system," let me summarize who's apart of the "conspiracy" (starting from the top): Dick Cheney, G. Bush, J. Bush, M. Bush, the Bin Ladens, Congress, NORAD, the TSA, the FDNY, Larry Silverstein, Chief Daniel Nigro, the FDPD, NIST, MIT, Harvard, Oxford, and every other University Dept in the entire world, save the University of Lethbridge's Philosophy Dept. and a few retired religion teachers.

    U heard of Lewinsky before?

  • @homerbear46

    You've missed your chance. I've moved on. I don't respond to people who make baseless claims and clearly have no comprehension of the English language, let alone the scientific method.

  • @homerbear46

    wow, more spam from the truther movement. Don't you feel guilty about appropriating a tragedy like this? The fourteen people that followed you to this video should be fucking ashamed of themselves. Quit lying to people and find a job.

  • @AlexanderTheGrub.....Ah the CLASSIC Shills's bullshit about how the "twoofer" lies to people...(while randomly lying about said "twoofer" apparently "spamming")..then the feigned "outrage" and "mortal-responsibility" while they PLEAD U to stop showing your fellow man REALITY.

    SO old...SO 07..LMFAO what a "noob"

    PS...thanks for ur advice, but I've got a job, I've been at it tonight, while u've been here, bitching about me taking too long to reply to your shit....

    what's your "job" then?

    :)

  • @homerbear46

    From YouTube:

    Spam is content and/or correspondence which causes a negative user experience by making it difficult to find more relevant and substantive material. It can sometimes be used to indiscriminately send unsolicited bulk messages to users.

    ...You've copy and pasted the same message on several of these videos and then liked them over and over. That constitutes spam. You accusing me of lying about it constitutes lying on your part.

    LMFAO what a "noob!" retard anus.

  • (sigh) I'm aware what "spam" is, & also that u're desperately changing the subject from the FACT 1400 A&E support US,while a few obvious shills that have made "no comment" over the last 6yrs , R ALL that support u.

    SO u bitched about me not being an engineer, then said "get a job", then bitched about me not replying immediately, (while I'm at my job) then bitched about "spam".

    SO WHICH vids exactly ? cos it looks like ur just tryin 2 peddle ur pussy-ass away from ME asking what ur JOB is :)

  • AlexTheGimp...let me guess...R u also a Proffessor of Explosives like Merlin5x5?

    He promised to make me a video 6 months ago PROVING his credentials, but he vanished and has been avoiding me ever since

    And still no video of those certificates...eh Merlie?

    :)

  • @homerbear46

    I work for the govt. AE911 is a joke a by the way. lol.

  • @AlexanderTheGood89 So R the Government :)

  • @homerbear46

    Sometimes.

  • @homerbear46

    ...But that just makes it all the more likely that they are incapable of pulling of 9/11.

  • @homerbear46

    I've seen this before. Copied and pasted, over and over.

    Spam = The Truther's Key Evidence and Recruitment Tool.

  • @AlexanderTheGood89 LOL no you haven't... it's totally original..which is why it's the FAVOURITE comment here and solicited your puny attempts at trolling..all MY posts are original, like my thoughts :) (I'm sure "original thoughts" will be a very difficult concept for u to comprehend)

    Lying- the standard response of a recruited TOOL :)

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

    How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

    If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?

  • @CrappyPasteCole

    Just a guess, but DrJones, maybe doesn't trust "her".

    What "PRP" did NIST go through exactly?

    LOL better than ur other version of this question, u know? where u LIE that MarvBush at Securacom "never happened"?

    Still the same weak straw-man that pretends u NEED HIM, sneaking around at nights with a drill though..hahaha silly Cole

    3 1st it's debatable there even WERE "plane impacts", 2nd, the main body of the charges would be in "the core structure" well away from ANY impact.

  • @homerbear46

    1) You have no clue how peer review works. Why hire a chief editor if you're not going to use her. Sure Jones didn't trust a scientist to agree with MAGIC!

    2) Marvin didn't even work there on 911. Securecom was NEVER in charge of WTC security. The Port Authority has ALWAYS been in charge of WTC security.

    3) Then where are the passengers? And according to the Purdue University modelling study the core WAS damaged heavily by the impact.

    homerbear46 DEBUNKED!

  • @CPcole 1, LOL..How do U think "peer review" works Cole.? (this'll be funny) AGAIN what "peer review" did NIST go thru? 2,According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the WTC "up to the day the buildings fell down." =D oh dear Cole. 3, the Vicsims.? LULZ PS did Purdouche University get in there & study it, before that "collapse"? THINK COLE 4, Where's that vid of u at ur engineering Job? (STILL NO REPLY) CPCole DEBUNKED as a MAN =D
  • QUESTIONS C/PCole IS AFRAID of.

    1,Why Are your "questions" filled with LIES, transparent "disinfo tactics" & have a loaded-nature that makes it obvious to any grown-up reading,that you CLEARLY don't want them to be answered?

    2, WHY, when these questions DO get answered,do u FAIL to respond to those answers, & have NO memory of them?

    3 Why DO YOU believe people have to answer YOU, when u're a COWARDLY bullshitter that can NEVER remember answers nor respond when he gets CAUGHT bullshitting?

  • QUESTIONS C/PCole IS AFRAID of.

    1 Why do u have a Texas "don't tread on me"rattlesnake as ur profile-pic, when u're a sniveling whore that spreads LIES, to support the "powers that be" attempting to"tread on" freedom, through the PNAC-inspired FFatrocity that was 9-11, & the subsequent "patriot act"?

    2 Why after ALL this time on YT, do u only have around 100 active subs, that are ALL"debunkers" that have a history of displaying similar cowardly tactics?

    3 What does RKOwens cock taste like?

  • @homerbear46

    It has nothing to do with Texas.  You have no clue about History. The Patriot Act doesn't effect me at all. I'm not a paranoid conspiracy theorist.

    Because I like debunkers and I love debunking 911 twoof.

    I don't know, I'm not gay.

    Are all 911 twoofers homophobic nazis?

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • @copypastecretin77 .

    //You have no clue about history

    I like it when you try to sound "learned"..it's funny as fuck.

    I know it's a Colonial-Flag and popular with Texans,I'm not a massive lover of red-neck culture so I wont bother googling it, then PRETENDING I know it...UNLIKE you, I don't need to do shit like that, I already own you easy enough (as THIS thread proves)..........

  • ....but....

    as for History...I remember YESTERDAY when you said you was "an engineer" and I asked you to make a vid to prove it, and you RUN AWAY, & returned today on numerous different videos changing the subject like a coward).

    ..I KNOW YOUR fucking history, don't I cole?

    Why NO video-proof of your engineer status Cole? asked for the TENTH TIME now on the three different threads this COWARD is "hitting and running" between..LMFAO@her

  • @crappypastecunt

    //Because I like debunkers and I love debunking 911 twoof.

    LMFAO at thisdelusio9nal bitch

    Ok then (stifles laughter at this,stale as fuck, Loose-change first edition troll)

    let's pretend again that you've EVER debunked shit

    why ONLY 100?..LOW isn't it?

    Kinda FUCKING LAME...for such a great debunker?

    AWWWW..THAT's GOTTA hurt =D

  • //II don't know, I'm not gay

    sure, and neither are the men who's cocks you suck.

    //Are all 911 twoofers homophobic nazis?

    ..LOL

    Like EdgemanLL2 that "homophobic nazi" who's cock ur ALWAYS sucking on?

    Quick, make an excuse why its fine when he does it, or he'll ban you from sucking his cock =D

    TOO EASY today Colon...take a break...the SOOOOO butthurt IS showing =D

  • "The university is aware that Dr. Steven Jones's hypotheses and interpretations of evidence regarding the collapse of WTC buildings are being questioned by a number of scholars and practitioners, including many of BYU's own faculty members. Professor Jones's department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."

    Woodruff Miller, Dept Chair, BYU Engineering

  • @ctcole77 3 week "breaks" = "TAPOUT" Cole =D

  • @ctcole77 "You have no clue about History". . .

    Anyone that claims to know anything about history, and yet defends The Patriot Act, and has no respect for The US Constitution. Well, what can be said of such a person? Someone mentioned that your 'avatar is the 'don't tread on me' flag. Is that supposed to be ironic or . . . ?

    Very wealthy, or very ignorant!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more