So the lines of these geometrical structures are capable of passing through one another as if they are almost non existent or have an ethereal like nature? Otherwise I don't quite understand how this video demonstrates these shapes. The lines are clearly intersecting one another where no vertices exist and are moving through one another like ghosts. Is that just some odd 4th dimensional law where non-localization is making this possible or something?
@Qu35t10n3v3ryth1n9 watch?v=UnURElCzGc0 . Notice that the projection (shadow) of the 3D cube consists of lines of different lengths which can intersect in the 2D world as Carl rotates the cube. In 3D, the cube has equal length edges that do not intersect. So what we see in this video is a 3D projection of a 4D object that is being rotated. In the 4D reality, all the edges of the shape are the same length and none will intersect
@KeepGoing11235 ahhh ok ok, makes much more sense now. Thanks for clearing that up. Completely spaced that we can really only perceive the 3rd dimension and below at this point :P haha
I don't understand, can you explain how the sides of complex structures such as the 600 cell's links between the vertices never intersect each other? What is the universal rule or pattern all these shapes follow in their natural 4th dimension?
@TexasHouseofCarnage Please see my comment to Qu35t... The rule of all of these shapes is that in each respective dimension, the shapes have edges of all the same length that only intersect at vertices.
I wish I could comprehend this to it's degree of importance concerning universal geometry and dimensional-space travel. We all just need more elaborate teachings over this subject. It's quite interesting.
so i was wondering, if u tried to put it on the x y z axis, would it be just another x u z axis on the z axis?
UltraGameAchiever 4 days ago
So the lines of these geometrical structures are capable of passing through one another as if they are almost non existent or have an ethereal like nature? Otherwise I don't quite understand how this video demonstrates these shapes. The lines are clearly intersecting one another where no vertices exist and are moving through one another like ghosts. Is that just some odd 4th dimensional law where non-localization is making this possible or something?
Qu35t10n3v3ryth1n9 2 weeks ago
@Qu35t10n3v3ryth1n9 watch?v=UnURElCzGc0 . Notice that the projection (shadow) of the 3D cube consists of lines of different lengths which can intersect in the 2D world as Carl rotates the cube. In 3D, the cube has equal length edges that do not intersect. So what we see in this video is a 3D projection of a 4D object that is being rotated. In the 4D reality, all the edges of the shape are the same length and none will intersect
KeepGoing11235 2 weeks ago
@KeepGoing11235 ahhh ok ok, makes much more sense now. Thanks for clearing that up. Completely spaced that we can really only perceive the 3rd dimension and below at this point :P haha
Qu35t10n3v3ryth1n9 2 weeks ago
I wonder if 4D objects exist in nature or if they only exist in abstract math.
matreyia 1 month ago
I don't understand, can you explain how the sides of complex structures such as the 600 cell's links between the vertices never intersect each other? What is the universal rule or pattern all these shapes follow in their natural 4th dimension?
TexasHouseofCarnage 6 months ago
@TexasHouseofCarnage Please see my comment to Qu35t... The rule of all of these shapes is that in each respective dimension, the shapes have edges of all the same length that only intersect at vertices.
KeepGoing11235 2 weeks ago
I wish I could comprehend this to it's degree of importance concerning universal geometry and dimensional-space travel. We all just need more elaborate teachings over this subject. It's quite interesting.
TexasHouseofCarnage 6 months ago
Comment removed
TexasHouseofCarnage 6 months ago
Not a bad video. I would recommend trying to make it more interesting for more views. :P
MEMercuryEnigma 1 year ago