A new law of gravity was discovered on 9-11. Fire in a high rise building can cause a free fall collapse. Not only that, the fire can be distributed unevenly and still result in a symmetrical collapse. Please watch clips of the WTC-7 collapse, the third high rise tower that fell at free fall speed on 9-11, despite no plane impact. I think I deserve a Nobel Prize for discovering this.
@toofreshraulc why the fuck would that matter? a baby could watch it, just because you're watching it doesn't make you smart...if you could pass a test in this class you could impress people with your age
@ls600h1 what happens to an isolated systems Center of Gravity over time? im not a wiz on this (
only 13) but if i had to guess it would be propose a definition of center of mass for asymptotically flat manifolds satisfying Regge-Teitelboim condition at infinity. This has natural propertites though aswell.
@plutoend99 Yeah, I don't mean to be aggressive, but firm. Sorry for any defensive reaction.
is600h1 is correct, too. But in HEP and any other astrophysical field, you have to make sure you don't confuse the small tricks that helped in high school chemistry with this.
@rugbyanden North American public education is garbage, relative to Europe. I studied Advanced Physics in the UK and we only covered up to Einstein's E=MC^2 ( this was in 1992-1994 ). If the UK triples university costs, the UK will end up like North America.
lol professor of stanford university got confused at the question of "-' sign along with vector Rij ! hahah.. thats so funny :) ... I NEVER EXPECTED SUCH CONFUSION ! LOL............ 39:37
This guy doesnt see that mass objects r something opposite to sources of energy, not just conteiners of energy, like abyss so strong that can bend time-space continium. This means that every mass object inhales energy from other object even when stands still, like a loop whole in time and space, there so every object with mass creates the abyss in time and space.
@maxxxa77 This leeds to a conclusion that mass, as feature of an object, inverts timespace continium into 5th dimension of space, inserted within mass object, so gravity is simply a approximation of banding magnitude of space-time continium. Since objects with lower mass inverts space and time less, magnitude of 5th dimension of space within object is smaller, infect so small that it cant be detected. For larger mass objects banding is so strong that space in 5th dimension bigger
@maxxxa77 and damn i thought its simple to explain this but for much more complex explaination this needs much more word capacity then here given and needs showing a model or picture how gravity works. For exaple use Einsteins aproximation that explained the universe endless and limmited nature
@maxxxa77 For example, picture universe as a surface of sphere, and picturise 3D objects as 2D objects on that surface. If u make a hole in that suface and create a limmited space around that hole (that goes in every direction around it) u will see that energy can be sucked through that hole into a space behinde the hole, like into abyss.
If it is known that these mathematical theories do not lead to a unified theory and thus are fundamentally false then why are they taught as fact? An answer would be appreciated, thanks.
@lazychimp123 That's because without understanding what's wrong, you cannot really fix it. In other words, to solve a problem, you need to know what the problem is! I hope I made sense! :)
@lazychimp123 our understanding of the universe is grounded in mathematical models of physical phenomena. In order to have a "fundamentally true" model, it would have to be as complex as the universe itself. However, with imperfect (but perhaps elegant) models, we can still accomplish much under limited parameters. With Newtonian physics, we put a man on the moon, and with Einsteinian physics, we invented GPS. Approximations too can offer insight on how the universe might function for real.
@lazychimp123 These theories give good results if u use them to solve problems with low rate of accurucy. So theres ur answer. If u seek much accurate models to solve gravity problems use Einsteins theory of relativity.
Of course he knows what Newton's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Laws are. He's lying that he doesn't know which is which in order to sound unique and more personable.
Yes an interesting lecture. For a simple pictorial introduction to relativity you could also try the book “General Relativity: A concise guide for beginners” available from Lulu.com
@BryanAKAGoofy2 Me niether, i love space and everything about it, i take notes on what he says, and i love all of it, ill keep watching it untill i get fully what he says.
I've never been very intelligent and always struggled with the sciences (always worried about asking questions in class didn't help me), but these online lectures allow me to pause and look up the answers to any questions I have (which incidentally leads to me pausing every other minute).
Always been very interested in science and now I feel I can learn at least some things despite being dumb :D
to whomever claims Newton was an idiot: you're an idiot, imagine living in the seventeenth century and figuring this out, with no-one doing your prework.
@mrnafstad Who can call Newton an idiot? He was one of the greatest intellectual minds of his time, I don't think anybody can be so ignorant as to call him an idiot.
@mrnafstad Yeah, and besides, Newton actually got it right (he didn't say F=ma) so whoever claims he was wrong doesn't know the first thing about mechanics
@ors112233 Lol, in Serbia that equsion is learn as vector equasion in elementary school. Btw, that is not correct presentation of Newtons 2nd law. Its more like F=d(m*v)/dt and k=m*v. Cuz in some accasion mass changes over time (like rockets), so even when theres no acceleration u will get force. Cool, a? :D
This stuff actually makes me want to learn more about it. Thank you so much for sharing. it's very kind of this university to share it's lectures. Thank you once again for doing so.
Are you seeking truth? Search for "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then click on "The Present" to open it. What it says will blow your mind.
Susskind should have taken a free falling elevator as an example. You can’t see what’s outside, so you can’t tell the difference between a snapped cable and the elevator falling because of that or the elevator just floating through empty space. It feels the same in both cases.
@albedoshader Lemme see... U made a poor example there dude. If u wanna compare acceleration with gravity u should look it like this. U could never be shore, if u r in rocket, wheter u been affected with some gravity from some massive object or simply rocket accelerated, cuz by their nature they r both same...
I know it's kind of silly, but I've done some research in wikipedia about doctoral advisors (from the most recent student to the oldest doctoral advisor):
Leonard Susskind <- Peter A. Carruthers <- Hans Bethe <- Arnold Sommerfeld <- Ferdinand von Lindemann <- Felix Klein <- Julius Plücker <- Christian Ludwig Gerling <- Carl Friedrich Gauss.
so it needs to be amplified? na actual sunlight. just wondering if we can theoretically capture light in its normal form other than capturing it and converting it into heat- electricity ect.. think ive watched to many movies lol... sorry if i sound like a dumbass. loooool
@1overlordi: If you had two perfect mirrors you could capture photons between them, bouncing to and fro all the time. Like the basic clocks you hear about in high school physics dealing with special relativity. Lasers use this principle, for example. But for practical real world purposes you need to convert the form of energy for storage.
@albedoshader: There are also such photon storage loops for optical computers, you need to store photons—even if it’s just for a few nanoseconds—for other optical data to arrive, for example. Or to adjust the wave packets to phase shifts in relation to other packets etc.
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
can some1 help with this. feedback at a rock concert. sound in mic out of speaker and back untill the setup blows. now put that concept to light wtf do u get and what would happen.??? plz explain lol
@1overlordi are you asking if it would loop forever? because you can try this with two cellphones put earpiece to receiver.. the sound has a diminishing return on its volume from the speakers or if you want to think of it as energy.. your vocal vibrations are converted into electrical signals losing some of its momentum and when they are converted and expanded through the speakers they are even weaker.. etc etc..
@AlvaroMadness That's cause this is serious business... not some lame physics lesson in mid school... this actually explains the whole creation. The only thing that goes unexplained is gravity... why? Because it's just there! It's nothing like a magnetic force because unlike magnets it doesn't attract electrons, but rather attract the nuclei towards something... without stripping their bonds with other nuclei [obviously we don't break apart cause of gravity pool]. It's worth learning believe me
@NyuSoftWorks Well, gravity is not just there dude, its not allpresent, its 1 of feature of objects which contain mass. If there was no mass in universe gravity would not exist. And it can be explained but not in a manner of Newtonian physics. Einstein gave nice explaination of it, but still never explained why its a feature of mass objects.
the example he gave at 18:00 was simple ,,,he meant to say that the particles fall without any deformation because the gravity pulls them with equal force.... and that idiot student was askin abt mechanical detection , optical detection .....
im used to it ,,, there are a lot of "wanna sound smart " students in my class...
this man is a genius and one of the leading physicists .... he doesnt need to explain each and every bit ... What is accln ? what is velocity ? or a vector ? ,,, lol
"This Stanford Continuing Studies course is the fourth of a six-quarter sequence of classes exploring the essential theoretical foundations of modern physics. The topics covered in this course focus on classical mechanics. Leonard Susskind is the Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University."
"The topics covered in this course focus on classical mechanics."
This is a continuing education program, more of a general survey of physics. Not so much an in depth study for physics majors.
@supermuloo dont worry man, we've all been there. ;) the key to understanding physics is perseverance and patience. Its NOT going to happen overnight lol.
This guy is a terrible teacher. He has no clue how to answer the questions that are presented to him and he creates a learning environment for his students such that it intimidates them to question what he is saying. When somebody wants to ask a question, he gets a look on his face that says, "Oh BROTHER!!!". Seriously? This guy is terrible. I haven't seen anything that is relativistic yet and I'm 50 minutes in. Is this a waste of my time?
Somebody who is capable and has genuine interest in physics would watch the whole thing. Why would it be a troll, these people are studying physics, of course its going to take longer than 5 mins.
@michaelcarr09 No, this video is absurdly long. At the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, this entire video would be condensed to a 50 minute lecture at most. All the information would be the same except it would be taught at twice the speed. This guy just repeats everything he says at least three times. It's infuriating to anybody with half a brain. The title is also patently false but fortunately the teacher makes that disclaimer in the first few seconds of the video.
Yeah, you are right in the sense that his teaching is questionable, I however felt that "nastybird" was commenting on what was being taught, not who was teaching it. I took his comment as meaning "who on earth would watch a 1 hour 30min lecture on mechanics" then the "gay as fuck" part only fortified my view that he was a moron.
One might think that Einstiens quest within definng anything within QM, is more related to defining any underlying physics within defining anything in regards to any world view' how much do we as children truly know about anything universall' like why does anything within anything economic exist in the first place? Intrinsic Anthropology? Evolution? Technological Ancestry? Innovations' Obsolesence? Perpetual Change? Anything Fundamentally Physical? Its all relative isnt it?
What is the theory of relativity trully all about? One should always see everything as a question' any question becomes any preceptual operativeness while attempting to make sense within any physical connotation, which demands any broad use within any word affiliation' speaking plain english is the ultimate sophystication as Davinci notes' this is all a part within defining anything within anything Quantum Mechanical' Galileo' Monte Concipio' I conceive through the mind first'
Whats difficult within any lecture is within maintaining any context within any sense for any part in construal' within arriving at any grasp within any subject for any eurdition. One can educate but one cannot teach anyone anything, the only reason gravity exists is because of barametric pressure' its not mathematical is it? No? Newtons theories are not conclusive within any metaphysical sense which fruition any construal, the physics within any language use is the most pertinent aspect
Whats difficult within any lecture is within maintaining any context within any sense for any part in construal' within arriving at any grasp within any subject of eurdition' one can educate but one cannot teach anyone anything, the only reason gravity exists is because of barametric pressure' its not mathematical is it? No? Newtons theories are not conclusive within any metaphysical sense which is fruitions any construal, the physical within any language use are the most pertinent part.
I am an artist and when I create a work of art it takes energy and is a process over a period of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π. There is always uncertainty ∆×∆p×≥h/4π of how the art work will turn out in three dimensional (4π spherical) space the position of the lines and curves π on the canvas. Every movement I make will have to start at the quantum level and will have an uncertainty of momentum and position therefore is Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle the same uncertainty we have with any future event?
Relatively speaking Relativity is not so relative isn't that special as neutrinos travel faster than light. the constant has changed...oopps uncle albert,We're so sorry, uncle albert,We're so sorry if we caused you any pain.We're so sorry, uncle albert,But there's no one left at home And i believe i'm gonna rain.
This has been flagged as spam show
great clip keep it up =)
fivequotes 5 days ago
ZZZZZzzzzzz boring!!!!!
DELUXX420 6 days ago
Comment removed
TheGreatDeciever55 6 days ago
lecture starts at 00.15. so 15 mins saved... thumbs up please.
shayanakbar 1 week ago 3
A new law of gravity was discovered on 9-11. Fire in a high rise building can cause a free fall collapse. Not only that, the fire can be distributed unevenly and still result in a symmetrical collapse. Please watch clips of the WTC-7 collapse, the third high rise tower that fell at free fall speed on 9-11, despite no plane impact. I think I deserve a Nobel Prize for discovering this.
390bullitt1968 1 week ago
This guy is a good teacher.
MrKal215 1 week ago
In addition to this lecture watch?v=H9ypy4SjR28
Devoradoptio 1 week ago
if everyone in africa shouts wud hear it in britain
traiE15 2 weeks ago
am i the only 15 year old watching this?
toofreshraulc 2 weeks ago
@toofreshraulc no ;)
WhiteDream1925 2 weeks ago
@toofreshraulc 15 here=)
Team nerd!
Siagos 2 weeks ago
@toofreshraulc why the fuck would that matter? a baby could watch it, just because you're watching it doesn't make you smart...if you could pass a test in this class you could impress people with your age
starhawks1 1 week ago 3
@toofreshraulc simply put, nope
BenjyKyleAtkinson 1 week ago
See what real physics is
milenica0208 2 weeks ago
Yeah, I'm on the school, tomorrow I have a physics exam and I'm here watching physics that are not absolutely related with my exam...
veduchahe 2 weeks ago
@veduchahe - LOL hmmmm, A-Levels ?
IFlatlineStudios 2 weeks ago
@veduchahe Same here =)
FartinDucks 2 weeks ago
what happens to an isolated systems Center of Gravity over time?
Does it remain the same? (No external forces)
ls600h1 2 weeks ago in playlist Course | Modern Physics: Einstein's Theory
@ls600h1 The gravitational axis of stability will not change without a change to the system, so no
shamanis1227 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ls600h1 what happens to an isolated systems Center of Gravity over time? im not a wiz on this (
only 13) but if i had to guess it would be propose a definition of center of mass for asymptotically flat manifolds satisfying Regge-Teitelboim condition at infinity. This has natural propertites though aswell.
qman3k 2 weeks ago
Every particle has a mass? wrong. electrons have no mass..
plutoend99 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
@plutoend99 Oh yeah, so a bunch of scientist pulled .511 MeV out of their asses?
Please, Sir; don't be absurd.
sudoLinux666 3 weeks ago
@sudoLinux666 That's not a mass.
plutoend99 3 weeks ago
@plutoend99 .511 MeV is the rest mass of an electron.
sudoLinux666 3 weeks ago
@sudoLinux666 ah, hmm alright..
plutoend99 3 weeks ago
@plutoend99 Yeah, I don't mean to be aggressive, but firm. Sorry for any defensive reaction.
is600h1 is correct, too. But in HEP and any other astrophysical field, you have to make sure you don't confuse the small tricks that helped in high school chemistry with this.
It's ~9.109x10^-31kg
Or ~.5109 MeV/c^2
The rest-mass is still ~.5109 MeV.
sudoLinux666 2 weeks ago
@sudoLinux666 Yeah that's right; there was a slight bit of confusion on my part.
plutoend99 2 weeks ago
@plutoend99
No, electrons have a negligible mass, and that is usually neglected.
It is present. Electrons do have rest mass... It is on the order of 10^-33 kgs
ls600h1 2 weeks ago in playlist Course | Modern Physics: Einstein's Theory
@ls600h1 thanks
plutoend99 2 weeks ago
@plutoend99 You're wrong, electrons have mass which is 9.10938188 × 10-31 kilograms
veduchahe 2 weeks ago
@BigRick420 Use Wikipedia and look up a "Torsion balance".
MrAgmoore 3 weeks ago
@rugbyanden North American public education is garbage, relative to Europe. I studied Advanced Physics in the UK and we only covered up to Einstein's E=MC^2 ( this was in 1992-1994 ). If the UK triples university costs, the UK will end up like North America.
MrAgmoore 3 weeks ago
wat
insideoutface 3 weeks ago
lol professor of stanford university got confused at the question of "-' sign along with vector Rij ! hahah.. thats so funny :) ... I NEVER EXPECTED SUCH CONFUSION ! LOL............ 39:37
AmmarAhmedSiddiqui 4 weeks ago
holy shit it's leonard susskind!!!
weedguy10000 1 month ago
@weedguy10000
I know right!!!
ls600h1 2 weeks ago
I used this to get to sleep
HondaSushi 1 month ago
@HondaSushi me 2 lol, but he is a great lecturer
WarringGod 1 month ago
Is this guy any good? he keeps saying that he doesn't know things.
av733 1 month ago
@av733 You jking? hahah
Singetally 3 weeks ago
@av733
He is probably the leading scientist in String Theories. Would be present among the greatest minds alive today in the field of physics
ls600h1 2 weeks ago
@ls600h1 Cool
av733 2 weeks ago
These students are asking ridiculous questions; they don't seem so bright to me.
theurbansurvivalist1 1 month ago 7
I agree, I just want him to get on with it.
av733 1 month ago
@theurbansurvivalist1
There´s no ridiculous questions.
B4db0YY123 1 week ago 15
@theurbansurvivalist1 continuing studies course bro
MadMusicJunkie420 5 days ago
This guy doesnt see that mass objects r something opposite to sources of energy, not just conteiners of energy, like abyss so strong that can bend time-space continium. This means that every mass object inhales energy from other object even when stands still, like a loop whole in time and space, there so every object with mass creates the abyss in time and space.
maxxxa77 1 month ago
@maxxxa77 This leeds to a conclusion that mass, as feature of an object, inverts timespace continium into 5th dimension of space, inserted within mass object, so gravity is simply a approximation of banding magnitude of space-time continium. Since objects with lower mass inverts space and time less, magnitude of 5th dimension of space within object is smaller, infect so small that it cant be detected. For larger mass objects banding is so strong that space in 5th dimension bigger
maxxxa77 1 month ago
@maxxxa77 and damn i thought its simple to explain this but for much more complex explaination this needs much more word capacity then here given and needs showing a model or picture how gravity works. For exaple use Einsteins aproximation that explained the universe endless and limmited nature
maxxxa77 1 month ago
@maxxxa77 For example, picture universe as a surface of sphere, and picturise 3D objects as 2D objects on that surface. If u make a hole in that suface and create a limmited space around that hole (that goes in every direction around it) u will see that energy can be sucked through that hole into a space behinde the hole, like into abyss.
maxxxa77 1 month ago
@maxxxa77
I don't understand what you're saying, but it seems interesting.
Could you point me towards the theory that encapsulates this concept?
Thanks
ls600h1 2 weeks ago
Great Lecture. You need to understand pure mathematics inorder to understand theoretical physics.
WorldEngineersOnline 1 month ago
I watch this video infront of my friends and pretend to understand everything this guy says. They think I'm a genius =[)
buhoman3 1 month ago
240p we meet again
mzaner 1 month ago in playlist einsteins theory of relativity
I wonder what fraction of those 607,720 viewers understood and saw through the whole video.
boarding5401 1 month ago
If it is known that these mathematical theories do not lead to a unified theory and thus are fundamentally false then why are they taught as fact? An answer would be appreciated, thanks.
lazychimp123 1 month ago
@lazychimp123 That's because without understanding what's wrong, you cannot really fix it. In other words, to solve a problem, you need to know what the problem is! I hope I made sense! :)
proxymindfly 1 month ago
@lazychimp123 our understanding of the universe is grounded in mathematical models of physical phenomena. In order to have a "fundamentally true" model, it would have to be as complex as the universe itself. However, with imperfect (but perhaps elegant) models, we can still accomplish much under limited parameters. With Newtonian physics, we put a man on the moon, and with Einsteinian physics, we invented GPS. Approximations too can offer insight on how the universe might function for real.
ezhao15 1 month ago
@lazychimp123 These theories give good results if u use them to solve problems with low rate of accurucy. So theres ur answer. If u seek much accurate models to solve gravity problems use Einsteins theory of relativity.
maxxxa77 1 month ago
Of course he knows what Newton's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Laws are. He's lying that he doesn't know which is which in order to sound unique and more personable.
IndigentiaSumEgo 1 month ago
Yes an interesting lecture. For a simple pictorial introduction to relativity you could also try the book “General Relativity: A concise guide for beginners” available from Lulu.com
pgb2323 1 month ago
Thank you very much for posting this series of videos.
jgrant142142 1 month ago
i am 12 and i like p. but i'm not able to understand this video 'cause it is very boring... When I'll grow up then I'll see it,,
palakissweet 1 month ago
@palakissweet Well, this lecture was basically on laws of motion and gravity .. you will study this topic in your high school and college
amanvds 1 month ago in playlist einstein part 1
i love physics but im only 14 and i dont get a huge chunk of what he is saying..physics...Y U NO MORE SIMPLE!?
BryanAKAGoofy2 1 month ago
@BryanAKAGoofy2 Me niether, i love space and everything about it, i take notes on what he says, and i love all of it, ill keep watching it untill i get fully what he says.
HeroclixManner 1 month ago
Thank you very much for posting these lectures.
I've never been very intelligent and always struggled with the sciences (always worried about asking questions in class didn't help me), but these online lectures allow me to pause and look up the answers to any questions I have (which incidentally leads to me pausing every other minute).
Always been very interested in science and now I feel I can learn at least some things despite being dumb :D
weefeatures 1 month ago 2
im 15 and watch this
HeroclixManner 1 month ago
@HeroclixManner I'm 11
EducationLover 1 month ago
@HeroclixManner nobody gives a shit
DaLastBoss 1 month ago
@HeroclixManner me to :)
MrAwesomesize 1 month ago
anyone got this bloke's number?
gentlemenpreferbush 1 month ago
Neutrinos
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
TenTonHorse 1 month ago
LOVE this stuff.
1xXxBENxXx1 1 month ago
to whomever claims Newton was an idiot: you're an idiot, imagine living in the seventeenth century and figuring this out, with no-one doing your prework.
mrnafstad 1 month ago 27
@mrnafstad Who can call Newton an idiot? He was one of the greatest intellectual minds of his time, I don't think anybody can be so ignorant as to call him an idiot.
extremoknight44 1 month ago 5
@extremoknight44 Welcome to YouTube, my friend.
discoapocalypse 1 month ago
@mrnafstad Yeah, and besides, Newton actually got it right (he didn't say F=ma) so whoever claims he was wrong doesn't know the first thing about mechanics
TheDaftySage 2 weeks ago
this guy is awesome!
4kx 1 month ago
oh my god, Leonard has got to be the best Professor. I got everything the first time and I never finished high school. I love this guy.
wickedhead88 1 month ago
I' m italian and I don't understand the joke from 49 to 49 . 10 .
starnutente1 1 month ago
@starnutente1 He means that when he went to Italy he ate a lot and got fatter (his weight went more horizontal (wider))
shield543 1 month ago
@shield543 OK, thanks :-)
starnutente1 1 month ago
didnt know that F=ma was a vector equation
ors112233 1 month ago
@ors112233
All forces are vectors... I don't think he mentioned that it was a net force though
dudejohnny 1 month ago
@ors112233 Lol, in Serbia that equsion is learn as vector equasion in elementary school. Btw, that is not correct presentation of Newtons 2nd law. Its more like F=d(m*v)/dt and k=m*v. Cuz in some accasion mass changes over time (like rockets), so even when theres no acceleration u will get force. Cool, a? :D
maxxxa77 1 month ago
0:11:24 this looks like a miligram...
mm13501 2 months ago
Comment removed
mm13501 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Could he not just answer the question? The theory of relativity is...
zziRedzz 2 months ago
Three body problem at 23:05 haha!
pratikdeoghare 2 months ago
Is this lecture really mostly about the inverse square law, or did I miss something?
doug65536 2 months ago
Amazing! That guy knows his stuff!
LordHaveMercy1212 2 months ago 5
@awesomenesscaleb
You are the idiot
arielhematsiraky 2 months ago
He lost me at divergence. I don't understand divergence and what Gauss's theorem.
takakyoma 2 months ago
xagonogax retarded
leoo13 2 months ago
Really good video :) I'd like to see more of these. Thanks for sharing.
Rockhoppable 2 months ago
This stuff actually makes me want to learn more about it. Thank you so much for sharing. it's very kind of this university to share it's lectures. Thank you once again for doing so.
healthconcious 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE SOMEONE HELP
is it possible: non zero force but zero work?
A)can you do that at curved trajectory?
please help i am desprate i need help now...
Elzelgator 2 months ago
1:01:00
deano1r 2 months ago in playlist More videos from StanfordUniversity
The overlords are coming.
mf3141592 2 months ago
the ugghhh.. ummm the ehhhh.... yes....ughhh
cloudforgiven 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you seeking truth? Search for "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then click on "The Present" to open it. What it says will blow your mind.
jchijan 2 months ago
Newton thought gravity was a constant? What an idiot!
awsomenesscaleb 2 months ago
Susskind should have taken a free falling elevator as an example. You can’t see what’s outside, so you can’t tell the difference between a snapped cable and the elevator falling because of that or the elevator just floating through empty space. It feels the same in both cases.
albedoshader 2 months ago
@albedoshader Lemme see... U made a poor example there dude. If u wanna compare acceleration with gravity u should look it like this. U could never be shore, if u r in rocket, wheter u been affected with some gravity from some massive object or simply rocket accelerated, cuz by their nature they r both same...
maxxxa77 1 month ago
@maxxxa77: Poor example? The falling elevator example was good enough for Einstein himself, you pigdin speaking dude!
albedoshader 1 month ago
ONE M0:00RE TIME!!!
WeShallNeverStop 2 months ago 23
@WeShallNeverStop
lmao
doubleja 2 months ago
@WeShallNeverStop hahaha ur awesome
emptybookreader 2 months ago
I know it's kind of silly, but I've done some research in wikipedia about doctoral advisors (from the most recent student to the oldest doctoral advisor):
Leonard Susskind <- Peter A. Carruthers <- Hans Bethe <- Arnold Sommerfeld <- Ferdinand von Lindemann <- Felix Klein <- Julius Plücker <- Christian Ludwig Gerling <- Carl Friedrich Gauss.
Ha!
Gytax0 2 months ago 2
Ive never took any sort of Physics class in my life. I feel smart understanding all of this.
xD
weisersa 2 months ago
MIT lecturers banned me from commenting on their videos. lol.
BeepimajeepBeep 2 months ago
so it needs to be amplified? na actual sunlight. just wondering if we can theoretically capture light in its normal form other than capturing it and converting it into heat- electricity ect.. think ive watched to many movies lol... sorry if i sound like a dumbass. loooool
1overlordi 3 months ago
@1overlordi: If you had two perfect mirrors you could capture photons between them, bouncing to and fro all the time. Like the basic clocks you hear about in high school physics dealing with special relativity. Lasers use this principle, for example. But for practical real world purposes you need to convert the form of energy for storage.
albedoshader 2 months ago
@albedoshader: There are also such photon storage loops for optical computers, you need to store photons—even if it’s just for a few nanoseconds—for other optical data to arrive, for example. Or to adjust the wave packets to phase shifts in relation to other packets etc.
albedoshader 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 3 months ago
can some1 help with this. feedback at a rock concert. sound in mic out of speaker and back untill the setup blows. now put that concept to light wtf do u get and what would happen.??? plz explain lol
1overlordi 3 months ago
@1overlordi are you asking if it would loop forever? because you can try this with two cellphones put earpiece to receiver.. the sound has a diminishing return on its volume from the speakers or if you want to think of it as energy.. your vocal vibrations are converted into electrical signals losing some of its momentum and when they are converted and expanded through the speakers they are even weaker.. etc etc..
TheWingman43 3 months ago
NERD
JGoff54321 3 months ago
@13stevensonc what evidence do or anyone you have of that? Im not trying to be a dick, i just want to know my stuff^^
bouncingpogostick 3 months ago
wonderful!
lanceblack888 3 months ago
coming from a 16 year old kid who has tried to understand this kind of stuff, this guy makes it EXTREMELY easy for me to comprehend.
ModulatedTesticle 3 months ago in playlist Course | Modern Physics: Einstein's Theory
hahahahaaa,
Lecture 1 570825 views
Lecture 2 122186 views
1/5e gived up..
AlvaroMadness 3 months ago
@AlvaroMadness That's cause this is serious business... not some lame physics lesson in mid school... this actually explains the whole creation. The only thing that goes unexplained is gravity... why? Because it's just there! It's nothing like a magnetic force because unlike magnets it doesn't attract electrons, but rather attract the nuclei towards something... without stripping their bonds with other nuclei [obviously we don't break apart cause of gravity pool]. It's worth learning believe me
NyuSoftWorks 2 months ago
@NyuSoftWorks Well, gravity is not just there dude, its not allpresent, its 1 of feature of objects which contain mass. If there was no mass in universe gravity would not exist. And it can be explained but not in a manner of Newtonian physics. Einstein gave nice explaination of it, but still never explained why its a feature of mass objects.
maxxxa77 1 month ago
it all started to become confusing after 1:01:30 ...
sabah2177 3 months ago
@sabah2177 Funnly it's the exact same time i became confused
NAEIRNBRUFORU 2 months ago
the example he gave at 18:00 was simple ,,,he meant to say that the particles fall without any deformation because the gravity pulls them with equal force.... and that idiot student was askin abt mechanical detection , optical detection .....
im used to it ,,, there are a lot of "wanna sound smart " students in my class...
BlueMonstter 3 months ago
this man is a genius and one of the leading physicists .... he doesnt need to explain each and every bit ... What is accln ? what is velocity ? or a vector ? ,,, lol
but still he does it ,,,,, amazing teacher ..,,,
BlueMonstter 3 months ago
what fascinates me though, is how many wanna-sound-intelligent students are at stanford
Psenas 3 months ago
"This Stanford Continuing Studies course is the fourth of a six-quarter sequence of classes exploring the essential theoretical foundations of modern physics. The topics covered in this course focus on classical mechanics. Leonard Susskind is the Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University."
"The topics covered in this course focus on classical mechanics."
This is a continuing education program, more of a general survey of physics. Not so much an in depth study for physics majors.
skam741 3 months ago
good video thanks
eatingtacos000 3 months ago
i have no high school diploma and i understood his teaching.
283inc 3 months ago
Comment removed
skipitraplayful 3 months ago
I'm 12. I lost it at 4:30.
supermuloo 3 months ago
@supermuloo dont worry man, we've all been there. ;) the key to understanding physics is perseverance and patience. Its NOT going to happen overnight lol.
Noblyuntruthful 3 months ago
This guy is a terrible teacher. He has no clue how to answer the questions that are presented to him and he creates a learning environment for his students such that it intimidates them to question what he is saying. When somebody wants to ask a question, he gets a look on his face that says, "Oh BROTHER!!!". Seriously? This guy is terrible. I haven't seen anything that is relativistic yet and I'm 50 minutes in. Is this a waste of my time?
ThoseWhoStayUofM 3 months ago
@ThoseWhoStayUofM have you researched who this guy actually is??
MrJohnnyd1982 3 months ago
yeah now i can say i took physics classes at stanford
fejic 3 months ago
Comment removed
michaelcarr09 3 months ago
Basic physics....Still waiting for the relativity theory after 40 minutes =P
Jusefu 3 months ago
@Jusefu hahahahaha me to u_u
FisicaCiencia 3 months ago
He lost me at "gravity"...
XagonogaX 3 months ago 47
@XagonogaX jackass
gigijbijbj 2 months ago
@XagonogaX I was just kidding at the time, I really do respect this man.
XagonogaX 2 months ago
@XagonogaX he had me at hello...
anasosa01 2 months ago 11
This isnt a troll video? wtf whos going to watch this whole thing? Gay as fuck
NastyBrid 3 months ago
@NastyBrid
Somebody who is capable and has genuine interest in physics would watch the whole thing. Why would it be a troll, these people are studying physics, of course its going to take longer than 5 mins.
michaelcarr09 3 months ago
@michaelcarr09 No, this video is absurdly long. At the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, this entire video would be condensed to a 50 minute lecture at most. All the information would be the same except it would be taught at twice the speed. This guy just repeats everything he says at least three times. It's infuriating to anybody with half a brain. The title is also patently false but fortunately the teacher makes that disclaimer in the first few seconds of the video.
ThoseWhoStayUofM 3 months ago
@ThoseWhoStayUofM
Yeah, you are right in the sense that his teaching is questionable, I however felt that "nastybird" was commenting on what was being taught, not who was teaching it. I took his comment as meaning "who on earth would watch a 1 hour 30min lecture on mechanics" then the "gay as fuck" part only fortified my view that he was a moron.
Yes the title is misleading.
michaelcarr09 3 months ago
Cheren brought me here
Comatoseqt 3 months ago
At 1.32.20 the subtitles say 'shaped like a a spear' not 'sphere'. Plus a few other mistakes in there - just to let you know.
williamusher 3 months ago
I mean a chimp.
williamusher 3 months ago
I lift weights/work out to this.
nagasako7 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
type in 'denise milani queen' into youtube search and select first video. trust me, you will NOT be disappointed
ManUntdforlife 3 months ago
doing this everyday would fucking suck... He probably gets mad pussy though, smart pussy...
OutFlowProductions 3 months ago
He looks like a monkey.
williamusher 3 months ago
Another good introduction is "Special Relativity: A concise guide for beginners" and "General Relativity: A concise guide for beginners"
pgb2323 3 months ago
One might think that Einstiens quest within definng anything within QM, is more related to defining any underlying physics within defining anything in regards to any world view' how much do we as children truly know about anything universall' like why does anything within anything economic exist in the first place? Intrinsic Anthropology? Evolution? Technological Ancestry? Innovations' Obsolesence? Perpetual Change? Anything Fundamentally Physical? Its all relative isnt it?
DrFruedienslip 3 months ago
What is the theory of relativity trully all about? One should always see everything as a question' any question becomes any preceptual operativeness while attempting to make sense within any physical connotation, which demands any broad use within any word affiliation' speaking plain english is the ultimate sophystication as Davinci notes' this is all a part within defining anything within anything Quantum Mechanical' Galileo' Monte Concipio' I conceive through the mind first'
DrFruedienslip 3 months ago
Whats difficult within any lecture is within maintaining any context within any sense for any part in construal' within arriving at any grasp within any subject for any eurdition. One can educate but one cannot teach anyone anything, the only reason gravity exists is because of barametric pressure' its not mathematical is it? No? Newtons theories are not conclusive within any metaphysical sense which fruition any construal, the physics within any language use is the most pertinent aspect
DrFruedienslip 3 months ago
Whats difficult within any lecture is within maintaining any context within any sense for any part in construal' within arriving at any grasp within any subject of eurdition' one can educate but one cannot teach anyone anything, the only reason gravity exists is because of barametric pressure' its not mathematical is it? No? Newtons theories are not conclusive within any metaphysical sense which is fruitions any construal, the physical within any language use are the most pertinent part.
DrFruedienslip 3 months ago
close your eyes and learn physics from Christopher Walken
giraffefrenzy 3 months ago
el pizarron Rules¡¡
mreolitozero 3 months ago in playlist Course | Modern Physics: Einstein's Theory
i think this guy is not really too good at teaching...
ghir0 3 months ago
I am an artist and when I create a work of art it takes energy and is a process over a period of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π. There is always uncertainty ∆×∆p×≥h/4π of how the art work will turn out in three dimensional (4π spherical) space the position of the lines and curves π on the canvas. Every movement I make will have to start at the quantum level and will have an uncertainty of momentum and position therefore is Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle the same uncertainty we have with any future event?
nickharvey7 3 months ago
you understand everything
mitchrocks1 3 months ago
Really intresting how he explained the general theory of relativity
aap1295 3 months ago
Science and education in general are mankinds greatest inventions by far. Thank goodness for youtube!
ZachRose88 3 months ago
Relatively speaking Relativity is not so relative isn't that special as neutrinos travel faster than light. the constant has changed...oopps uncle albert,We're so sorry, uncle albert,We're so sorry if we caused you any pain.We're so sorry, uncle albert,But there's no one left at home And i believe i'm gonna rain.
starview1 3 months ago in playlist Course | Modern Physics: Einstein's Theory
Christopher Walken as a Stanford professor...
fightinirish273 3 months ago
lol, whacking off
devil1887 3 months ago
HAZARDCINEMA brought me here :)
SlayerKillsGuides 3 months ago
I like how the person or program that annotated this hasn't heard of the term "Scalar" and just types "Scale of" xD
khianidude 3 months ago
@khianidude Ahahah xD
darkendless89 3 months ago in playlist Einstein's General Theory of Relativity-Lectures
It must be so handy to know if you do miss a lecture, it'll be on youtube.
ASlave2Gravity 3 months ago
Comment removed
SlayerKillsGuides 3 months ago
@SlayerKillsGuides spelling fail nuff said
JoeDeeeezy 3 months ago