What a difference to the string quartet version! I remains an experiment. That's why it sounds so brisk and marchy. Strings can sustain the notes, piano cannot (except great pianists, who semm to sustain..., you know what I mean, if you are professional). Just diligent, but (for me) in vain.
If you can somehow share the sheet music for your arrangement it would be very appreciated. It also pains me not to be able to play music like this. please, i beg you
First impression, at the beginning, is it's too brisk, too marchy. Not weighty enough. Also, something of the mystery is lost, but that's largely because so much of it is created by the timbre of the strings interacting.
Nice! You might want to pay a bit more attention to voicing & phrasing so that the long sections sound less like successive chords and more like 4 individual voices (it's a 4-voice hymn, after all). I like how you executed that part beginning at 2:20. Maybe quicken the tempo here, for contrast. Try to vary the dynamics in that long trill to make it more interesting. Again, a little more attention to phrasing and voices. This is a really good transcription! I like it a lot.
Additionally, beware the trap of accelerating just because there is a crescendo (implied or written). The "feeling new strength section" needs to have more life and be faster. Try listening to the Borodin Quartet or the Alban Berg Quartet's version.
WD-40 that squeaky ass chair. Otherwise awesome.
Zachfive87 6 months ago
lovely :)
BooteeDesigns 1 year ago
Its really wonderful, thank you for this gift. Consider traveling and giving recitals with your transcription. Bravo!!
kmatson07 1 year ago
lo mejor el encuadre!
asemtu 2 years ago
It's so beautiful! But don't be afraid of sustaining all the tempo of the large chords!
leomulder 2 years ago
What a difference to the string quartet version! I remains an experiment. That's why it sounds so brisk and marchy. Strings can sustain the notes, piano cannot (except great pianists, who semm to sustain..., you know what I mean, if you are professional). Just diligent, but (for me) in vain.
eckarteckart 3 years ago
If you can somehow share the sheet music for your arrangement it would be very appreciated. It also pains me not to be able to play music like this. please, i beg you
skagnfka 3 years ago
First impression, at the beginning, is it's too brisk, too marchy. Not weighty enough. Also, something of the mystery is lost, but that's largely because so much of it is created by the timbre of the strings interacting.
Thanks so much for playing for us!
Bravo!
weepingforbrunnhilde 4 years ago 2
Nice! You might want to pay a bit more attention to voicing & phrasing so that the long sections sound less like successive chords and more like 4 individual voices (it's a 4-voice hymn, after all). I like how you executed that part beginning at 2:20. Maybe quicken the tempo here, for contrast. Try to vary the dynamics in that long trill to make it more interesting. Again, a little more attention to phrasing and voices. This is a really good transcription! I like it a lot.
norcalrobbie2 4 years ago
Yes! Varying the dynamics in the trill! Excellent suggestion.
weepingforbrunnhilde 4 years ago
Additionally, beware the trap of accelerating just because there is a crescendo (implied or written). The "feeling new strength section" needs to have more life and be faster. Try listening to the Borodin Quartet or the Alban Berg Quartet's version.
pianist1972 4 years ago
Not bad...a little too fast on the chordal section and rushes as it goes.
pianist1972 4 years ago