Added: 1 year ago
From: ObamaComma
Views: 272
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Any actual communism in China is far underground. Murdoch's only allegiance is to capitalism. Just like Deng, the 'capitalist roader.' And just like liberal phonies who pretend Obama is not attempting to encircle China, risking "totaler krieg" in defense of our declining empire.

  • @whizbang47

    Well, yes; however the existing centralized control apparatus will make it easier for judeo-marxism and the "corporate-communistic" establishment to plant its roots in China. Giant corps and media moguls generally don't favor true free markets; they instead seek markets with effective control levers. This is most obviously true for oligarchs/entities which are described as "left," but also for ones who people consider to be on the "right."

  • Excellent vid I'm going to check this things out! For myself! I suggest everyone on here do the same!

  • Hysterical - you people are just so damn funny and pathetic. You can't argue the facts so you make up this garbage? I did the research on this, I saw the ENTIRE Beck show you have twisted, I researched this propaganda U are spreading and ur just a pathetic ALINSKY liar. It's too bad for u and your "progressive" ilk that the American people have woken up to the point that the only way you can hope to maintain power is to grant AMNESTY to a bunch of criminals. I'll be laughing harder in Nov.

  • @g1namak - Good for you. You saw the ENTIRE Beck show, and have nothing you can say but to call people the typical Republican "Texas tea-party" insults. Since you saw the ENTIRE show, why don't you use logic to demonstrate how Beck's point is really accurate and the criticism was invalid? Oh that's right, you can't. Despite watching the entire show of spin-doctoring on Republican nazi history.  As far as November goes, America is desperately trying to recover from what Republicans did 8 years

  • @ObamaComma - (cont) under the last round. When Republicans go back in, they will finish the job, and you can kiss it good bye. They will finish destroying the economy, cut all security assistance to the people, fight more wars for oil, and continue to nullify the Bill of Rights and the Constitution with their 1930s fascist model of Government.

  • @g1namak

    Nah, it's partly true; however it might not be presented most accurately. The NeoCons' lineage does indeed stem from the far left. The Washington Post has a nice chart which you can easily find on the Web, titled: "Neocons: An illustrated Progression". Or you can watch the video of this interesting Congressional speech:

    "Ron Paul Exposes the Neoconservatives"

  • You progressives are really grasping at straws. Of all the things Glenn talks about, this is all you can come up with? So many clips being produced to make him look bad is proof that you are scared to death that people are waking up to what is going on.

  • @Timm2767 - if you really believe that you are dumber than the people on those Tea-party videos thinking they are fighting their own extermination in FEMA death camps. People "woke up" to what was going on when they voted George H. out of office (and haven't elected a Republican president since). You are being deceived, and you refuse to see the truth about it. (even when you see it with your own eyes) NIXON went to CHINA dumbass. NIXON was the protege of A NAZI. That NAZI BUSH!

  • @ObamaComma Before the war, Prescott Bush was involved with an American co doing business with a German company ( Thyssen). Thyssen supported Hitler, until 1941. If China were to end up our enemy, and we go to war against China, does that make Obama a war criminal for the Chi-Coms? After all, he saved GM, which is making profit building cars in China.

  • @Timm2767 - PS Glenn Beck is not there to tell you the truth about what happened in history. He's there to lie about it for Roger Ailes, former right-wing Nixon political operative during Watergate. Remember Nixon, Prescott Bush's protege? And the Bush family, who now feed you all this crap on your TV called FOX News. Glenn Beck is the biggest liar in America. His lies are so off the chart professional historians laugh. They laugh! Not because of some "conspiracy" but because he's SO WRONG

  • @ObamaComma Another person defaming Beck, claiming lies, without any reference.

  • @Timm2767 no historians take Glenn Beck's view of history seriously. The man has no credentials to be teaching history, Especially so distorted. His lies are everywhere. Yes sometimes the left over exaggerate Glenn's errors, but in the end, they are right!

  • @L33terPan Suppose I have no credentials to teach math, but am actually able to do basic arithmetic. Does that make make my statements about arithmetic invalid? Is one plus one not two, even if I lack a "credential"? You need to debunk Beck`s facts, not that he lacks a "govt" credential.

  • Very interesting upload this. We want more!

  • 1:46: He said opposed to F.(D.)R. and the New Deal and the Communists. He's the first conservative I've ever heard admit that Nazis opposed the Communists. Seriously, most conservatives claim the Nazis WERE Communists.

    It's also funny because The Communist are Beck's go to liberal villain, and here he is grouping them with F.(D.)R. and the New Deal!

  • @Retact

    Yeah, the "Nazis" did in fact fight the genocidal Commies. Americans are finally starting to understand it, after decades of disinfo by Zionist authors who posed as "historians." Moreover, FDR not only sided with the Commies, but also worked on behalf of the pro-Marxist banking cabal which is said to have financed the Commies. Hence, FDR was very overtly a Communist-sympathizer. Here's a nice video:

    "Adolf and Controversy"

  • @LibertaerUeberAlles

    The genocidal Nazis opposed and fought against the Communists (who also killed Jews for being Jewish, but not nearly on the scale the Nazis did). If FDR was such a communist-sympathizer why did he voice regret in allying with The USSR against the Axis, saying that he would not have if they hadn't had a common enemy? "pro-Marxist banking" Marx hated the banking system. It is the one thing in the Communist Manifesto I agree with.

  • @Retact

    Re: Marx: Yes, he hated it; however, Trotsky didn't. Watch: "International Jewish Communism"

    Re: FDR: He's said to have had low intelligence, so perhaps anything is possible. Then again, maybe his advisers were leery of Stalin, who didn't fit the normal Judeo-Marxist mold (although his "Willing Executioners" most certainly did). Watch: "Cheka and NKVD"

    Re: "Nazis": How do you explain that SS founder, Emil Maurice, is ethnically Jewish? Google: "Jewish Support for Adolf Hitler"

  • Some interesting and telling information here about Murdoch's business activities, but the political terms used throughout are wildly inaccurate.

    China practices state capitalism. Referring to them as "Communist" is no less a mischaracterization than seen in a Glenn Beck history lesson. China is to communism as the US is to democracy - popular sentiments used by leaders to gain political support from the people.

    Nazi Communist Republicans??

    What you're really calling attention to is Despotism.

  • @Mars2O84 - The phrase at the end was tongue in cheek Glenn Beck speak. And yes, China today is not the China of the 1950s. They have entrepreneurs, Walmart, McDonalds and KFC, just no "perestroika". Under Bush Republicsans, we didn't either, and probably won't as soon as they go back into power, God help us.

  • @ObamaComma

    I can see that as tongue-in-cheek.

    Yes, Bush/Cheney PNAC neocons were terrible, but Democrats always either feign opposition or outright continue many Bush-era policies in the "war on terror," and in some cases take them to the next level. Why do you insist on singling out the GOP when really both parties are corrupt and only interested in keeping their own power? (I mean in general, not just this vid specifically)

  • @Mars2O84 - Corruption extends wherever there are humans and exists there despite vows, laws, ideals and regulations to the contrary. When the corruption itself becomes rationalized and made the vow, law, ideal and regulation, there is systemic destruction. The former are wher ethe Democrats are, the latter are where the Republicans are, and there is a difference. The people responsible for the worst presidency in history are still running the GOP and will until they die of old age.

  • @OC

    You claim that Democrats are morally superior, but they operate within the same institutionalized corruption as Republicans. The most obvious form is the legalized bribery known as campaign contributions.

    I understand your point about corruption being part of human nature. That may be so, but another important factor to consider is the very structure that society at large has taken. The institutions that guide society rely on corruption, manipulation, and violence to achieve their goals.

  • @Mars2O84 - I probably have even stronger veiws on reform than you do, because I have been involved with it, and know what is happening. And you are correct that money is the issue. But it starts with a legal system that sells justice and political services to the highest bidder, the same way that the medical system does. But you are not going to see anything change by throwing your hands up in the air and calling it all "corrupt". (cont)

  • @ObamaComma - If you are a teacher, and you are teaching first graders, do you call them all stupid and walk away because they do not know anything? Or do you spend the time teaching them, realizing all along, some will get it and some will not, in the end? But eventually most will learn? Change is slow but it does happen, and sometimes it takes centuries of societies discussing a truth before it finally dawns on the people who run things, they need to update a policy or practice.

  • @OC

    I agree. change takes time. But where societies past may have spent a century discussing ideas, it's not an equal comparison since the dissemination of information is much faster today.

    Money is the issue, but I don't think the problem STARTS with legislative or judicial favors. I believe it stems from the greed and lust for profit of private industry.

    In either case, both parties play the game. That's not throwing my hands up and calling it all corrupt, that's just discussing a truth.

  • @Mars2O84 - That is true. both do "play the game", and that is my point. A game involves 2 sides which oppose each other over something. One side wins, the other loses. Corporate interests are not monolithic. What is good for one corporation, is bad for another. So which corporations are in the best interests of the country? Exxon or Solar Energy LTD? Cato Institute or Center for American Progress? American Spectator or National Rvw? All corporations, but vastly different. There is a choice

  • @OC

    Clever, turning that phrase around, but "to play a game" also implies something fun and inconsequential. The richest corporations in the world, backed by the wealthiest individuals, along with their political friends, often benefit when the vast majority of American people lose - weak financial oversight, lax safety regulations, unenforced environmental standards, war.

    You make it sound like lobbyist competition will lead to a brighter tomorrow.

    If it is a game, it's for high rollers only.

  • @ObamaComma

    Well, I'd say the Walmart, KFC, and McD's could best be described as "corporate communism" -- not really entrepreneurism, per se. However, there are some other, legitimate entrepreneurial efforts in China.

  • Excellent stuff Obama Comma. More. More. More!

  • @seamoremonster WOW! Glen Beck is so dumb... He loves Nazis, he's always talking about Hitler, socialism, communism, and keeps on talking out of his ass...

  • @Pellegrino80 But he's just marginally smarter than the rubes and the hicks who listen to his bullshit.

  • Glen Beck has read Mein Kampf and adheres to the propaganda of Hitler...

    "The great masses of the people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one." Adolph Hitler, "Mein Kampf".

  • @seamoremonster

    Yeah, except that your "quote" doesn't actually appear in Mein Kampf, or anywhere else in Hitler's writing or speeches. You should read MK, sometime. Easily found on the Web.

    The MK Second Book is even better, since it is more recent.

  • @LibertaerUeberAlles Thanks. Is it Goebbels? I'll give it a look. It was one of those quotes attributed to Hitler...I certainly didn't get it from the source. I stand corrected.

  • @seamoremonster

    You're very welcome. But, no, it wasn't Goebbels, either. Hitler mentions the "Big Lie" in MK, but in reference to the Jewish media masters, who deceivingly blamed Field Marshal Ludendorf for Germany's defeat in the First World War. Most military veterans blamed it on the Jewish Marxists & profiteers.

    That's why, when Goebbels later speaks of such matters, he is not lying, but rather echoing a widely shared view. You can google the article:

    "Joseph Goebbels Place in History"

  • Not surprising in the least..

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more