For me both were great and fair players. They had my sympathy. In this match I was for Edberg, because I thought Courier would dominate the men singles tour for a decade. Silly, if you see, how things went on, but in a short period from 1991-1993 Courier were unstoppable.
courier is too good,and serious,it is good too,because when we are serious we can move forward and win!!! yet edberg,beker,bjorn,sampras...are good too!!!
Edberg's strongest weapon was his weakest in that match and Courier used his chances. I like Edberg a lot
vladinikolov01 1 year ago
@vladinikolov01
For me both were great and fair players. They had my sympathy. In this match I was for Edberg, because I thought Courier would dominate the men singles tour for a decade. Silly, if you see, how things went on, but in a short period from 1991-1993 Courier were unstoppable.
Stier19812002 1 year ago
edberg was better on faster hard courts like the US open where he beat courier in 92
robertk2007 2 years ago
courier is too good,and serious,it is good too,because when we are serious we can move forward and win!!! yet edberg,beker,bjorn,sampras...are good too!!!
poweroflove45 2 years ago
Edberg is still the better player, I love the serve and volley.
Courier is to serius
SchlagerOskar 3 years ago 2