ALF is a terrorist organization that has burned houses and research builings. they have beat people with ball bats putting many in the hospital and killing a few. i guess alf supporters also supported osama bin laden.
Why is it that when celebrities are hounded by paparazi, the celebrities take swings at those holding the camera, and the celebrities are the ones that go to jail. However similarly in this case, it is the activists that are in trouble? What was the threat? It was the 'Husband' in this case that imposed the violence and the (peaceful) activists left. They didn't have weapons they only embarassed and angered someone in a residence. big deal! such a hostile world for nonsenese.
what a waste of fcuking time, took 10mins to load this video because fbidiots are suppressing my broadband, your all big girls and need your nappies changing cos your all full of IT
What's next? 10 years in prison for girl scouts because they disturb the peace by trying to inflict their cause of multiple sclerosis victims because they threaten the ignore suffering and gorge yourself to sleep way of life?
How about 20 years for anyone that knocks on a door and gets chased out by an angry person who knows that what they do for money represents a huge immoral lobby group?
Guilt causes people to act violently. And when the state is behind them, watch out.
Are you serious people? What the hell were they doing at these peoples homes? Un-educated youths - go protest the government to change the laws, not private citizens who are not breaking any laws.
Yea, propaganda is rife. Your only a terrorist, if your country disagrees with your views and stance. I suppose theres nothing we can do though, to escape the clutches of society and hierarchy.
The law is what they say it is. I dont know if thy're free to change, add or remove laws at will, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Our Goverments will only try to bring about change, if it suits there needs. Fuck the working class citizen, fuck the negative impacts these changes might have on us.
It is not a matter of disagreeing with someone's stance. What makes this group, and those like them, terroristic, is violence. Just because you want something one way, does not give you the right to force it onto others.
Violence? The animal rights movement is the least violent movement in history. Animal rights activists have not been violent. Using your terrorism definition, cops and government are the terrorists- they have forced their views on us. So- again- using your definition- forcing animals to undergo torture and be killing is terrorism because it is one person forcing their views on others. The AETA 4 were using freedom of speech- they didn't hurt or force anything on anyone.
It is pretty clear that the word "terrorism" was only included to smear the accused, so that the public will only hear that key word, and refuse to look at the facts. As soon as that word is dropped people loose all rational thought. I'm going to feature this video- I hope others feature to. It is so important that people get the facts so they can realize how unconstitutional (and immoral) AETA is. Citizens are not legally obliged to follow acts, statutes or laws that are unconstitutional.
LOL...whoever told you that citizens are not legally obliged to follow acts, statutes and laws that you deem unconsititutional, is setting you up for failure. Doing as you wish, regardless of the law, is called anarchism. I see by your profile that you are advocate of that. Your belief in one ideal does not nullify the existence and legitimacy of the other.
Actually- in the USA citizens legally DO NOT have to follow unconstitutional regulations. In my district, our codes say that citizens can "break" unconstitutional laws intentionally in order to bring the constitutionality into court. I may be an anarchist, but I still know the law better than you.
ALF is a terrorist organization that has burned houses and research builings. they have beat people with ball bats putting many in the hospital and killing a few. i guess alf supporters also supported osama bin laden.
beavthetrapper 5 months ago
what is the AETA 4? I know what the AETA is and I strongly do not support this act for it takes the freedom away from us Americans.
HolyBio 1 year ago
Why is it that when celebrities are hounded by paparazi, the celebrities take swings at those holding the camera, and the celebrities are the ones that go to jail. However similarly in this case, it is the activists that are in trouble? What was the threat? It was the 'Husband' in this case that imposed the violence and the (peaceful) activists left. They didn't have weapons they only embarassed and angered someone in a residence. big deal! such a hostile world for nonsenese.
DanielManahan 1 year ago
FBI = fucking bunch of Idiots (the of is silent)
Scythyable 1 year ago
what a waste of fcuking time, took 10mins to load this video because fbidiots are suppressing my broadband, your all big girls and need your nappies changing cos your all full of IT
Scythyable 1 year ago
Comment removed
Scythyable 1 year ago
What's next? 10 years in prison for girl scouts because they disturb the peace by trying to inflict their cause of multiple sclerosis victims because they threaten the ignore suffering and gorge yourself to sleep way of life?
How about 20 years for anyone that knocks on a door and gets chased out by an angry person who knows that what they do for money represents a huge immoral lobby group?
Guilt causes people to act violently. And when the state is behind them, watch out.
NolramNrets 1 year ago
Are you serious people? What the hell were they doing at these peoples homes? Un-educated youths - go protest the government to change the laws, not private citizens who are not breaking any laws.
markchattyful 2 years ago
Comment removed
markchattyful 2 years ago
great postings, MFAL for the exposing of the corruption in our gov't
attila1997 2 years ago
Yea, propaganda is rife. Your only a terrorist, if your country disagrees with your views and stance. I suppose theres nothing we can do though, to escape the clutches of society and hierarchy.
The law is what they say it is. I dont know if thy're free to change, add or remove laws at will, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Our Goverments will only try to bring about change, if it suits there needs. Fuck the working class citizen, fuck the negative impacts these changes might have on us.
trapped
ncshuriken 2 years ago 2
It is not a matter of disagreeing with someone's stance. What makes this group, and those like them, terroristic, is violence. Just because you want something one way, does not give you the right to force it onto others.
faolbushcraft 2 years ago
Violence? The animal rights movement is the least violent movement in history. Animal rights activists have not been violent. Using your terrorism definition, cops and government are the terrorists- they have forced their views on us. So- again- using your definition- forcing animals to undergo torture and be killing is terrorism because it is one person forcing their views on others. The AETA 4 were using freedom of speech- they didn't hurt or force anything on anyone.
baxterandcotton 2 years ago
It is pretty clear that the word "terrorism" was only included to smear the accused, so that the public will only hear that key word, and refuse to look at the facts. As soon as that word is dropped people loose all rational thought. I'm going to feature this video- I hope others feature to. It is so important that people get the facts so they can realize how unconstitutional (and immoral) AETA is. Citizens are not legally obliged to follow acts, statutes or laws that are unconstitutional.
baxterandcotton 2 years ago 11
LOL...whoever told you that citizens are not legally obliged to follow acts, statutes and laws that you deem unconsititutional, is setting you up for failure. Doing as you wish, regardless of the law, is called anarchism. I see by your profile that you are advocate of that. Your belief in one ideal does not nullify the existence and legitimacy of the other.
faolbushcraft 2 years ago
Actually- in the USA citizens legally DO NOT have to follow unconstitutional regulations. In my district, our codes say that citizens can "break" unconstitutional laws intentionally in order to bring the constitutionality into court. I may be an anarchist, but I still know the law better than you.
baxterandcotton 2 years ago
SUPPORT!
detestt 2 years ago 12