The matter that the tape is to low quality, is resolved with the publication in high quality, already attached... here the strangeness is noticed of as it is not identifiable when void nul disappears: Thankssss
It's not really the resolution that I'm taking objection to, more the lack of stability, continuous zooming, loss of focus etc. With all this going on it's not possible to examine the movement of the object, which I still maintain is mundane in nature.
The bright object was very distant, for this the use of the zoom, and dark worsens the situation, from a tape in YouTube there is not a lot to examine, since in original it was of 200 Mb and here only 25 (in H.Q.)... almost 10 times less, can tell you that is not really spherical, but crushed, elittico, change of color and of intensity, perhaps I perhaps say has a light rotation!
if it were possible to identify this, the whole mystery would be resolved, since it is everything connected, you don't have to aim at a single tape, who has viewed my fpotage ... has been surprised, inclusive ivi Richard M. Dolan that it is not the first arrival
if it were possible to identify this, the whole mystery would be resolved, since it is everything connected, you don't have to aim at a single tape, who has viewed my fpotage ... has been surprised, inclusive ivi Richard M. Dolan that it is not the first arrival
omg attack of the canadians:)
MasakoHQ 4 years ago
Comparing your indistiguiashable blob with other similarly vague objects isn't in any way proof of their validity.
Progress1928 4 years ago
The comparison is valid, simply because they are objects filmed by me, of the same nature, it belongs to my experience
Amydele 4 years ago
The matter that the tape is to low quality, is resolved with the publication in high quality, already attached... here the strangeness is noticed of as it is not identifiable when void nul disappears: Thankssss
Amydele 4 years ago
It's not really the resolution that I'm taking objection to, more the lack of stability, continuous zooming, loss of focus etc. With all this going on it's not possible to examine the movement of the object, which I still maintain is mundane in nature.
Progress1928 4 years ago
The bright object was very distant, for this the use of the zoom, and dark worsens the situation, from a tape in YouTube there is not a lot to examine, since in original it was of 200 Mb and here only 25 (in H.Q.)... almost 10 times less, can tell you that is not really spherical, but crushed, elittico, change of color and of intensity, perhaps I perhaps say has a light rotation!
Amydele 4 years ago
My point is that this footage in no way backs up your claims, and makes identification impossible.
Progress1928 4 years ago
if it were possible to identify this, the whole mystery would be resolved, since it is everything connected, you don't have to aim at a single tape, who has viewed my fpotage ... has been surprised, inclusive ivi Richard M. Dolan that it is not the first arrival
Amydele 4 years ago
if it were possible to identify this, the whole mystery would be resolved, since it is everything connected, you don't have to aim at a single tape, who has viewed my fpotage ... has been surprised, inclusive ivi Richard M. Dolan that it is not the first arrival
Amydele 4 years ago