Added: 2 months ago
From: trailers
Views: 203,904
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (742)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wow. meryl streep. she. is. the. best . actress . in. the. world. !!!

  • God Damned! I Just watched it In Full HD Version at Movies90.got.to

  • Kind of leaves out what a ruthless evil bitch she was.

  • Party when Thatcher dies!

  • Oh god, another youtube video where the comments are filled with two people who are to stuborn to give it a rest>_>

  • zzzzzzzzzz boring

  • Best Collection of Movies at Movie401.way.to

  • Please someoneeee the name of the melody at the beginning of the video??

  • @jongonzale . not that i want to .. -,-

  • the iron shit!

  • music? 

  • you can watch the movie in my channel

  • iron man's wife ?

    

  • @BenZen920729 God bless you! I laughed so much!! hahahahahaaa!!

  • What song plays in the video?

  • is it just me or the last scene where she says "gentlmen shall we join the ladies" was not in the movie i saw??????????

  • @riptor01 It was in the one I saw, but I can't recall the context...

  • long live the Iron Lady

  • Epic death stare at 1:45.

  • this is truly an amazing movie about an amazing woman

  • @AGpixar2000 She wasn't amazing

  • @SuperCameronRobin thats ur opinion

  • Maggie! Maggie, you cunt! Maggie! Maggie, you cunt! Maggie, Maggie, Maggie, Maggie, you fucking cunt!' - the Exploited. lol. I will not see this movie. I love Meryl Streep but I love labor unions more, and I can't bear to see anyone humanize that wretched pig Thatcher.

  • @DemilichFan Margaret Thatcher believed in the basis of labour unions - to secure safe and healthy work environments. She did not believe in the abusive power wielded by Britain's union in the 70s/80s. The country was backward and noncompetitive and she never did anything so well as to end tyranny. Read "There is No Alternative" by Claire Berlinski and you might learn why Thatcher did what needed to be done.

  • Comment removed

  • @negvar GB prior to Thatcher had some of the highest labor costs per unit of outcome in the world. Under Thatcher, that did a 180. Costs usually fall as production rises, that much is true. So, it all depends on the government's motives. Shall we make sure that workers are compensated fairly and working families do well, or shall we increase productivity and make things cozy for business? Your Berlinski likely supports the latter course, that's why she thinks Thatcher did what needed...

  • @DemilichFan ...to be done. As for me, I oppose financialization. Thatcher was no revolutionary. Financialization and speculation aren't the agents of progress, championed by forward-looking deep thinkers. No, they're just the tools of moneyed interests, used to consolidate wealth and undermine workers. Neither Thatcher nor Reagan could ever convince me that financialization is a better model for growth than sustaining domestic industry and decent living and working standards.

  • @DemilichFan Just because she won doesn't mean she was right.

  • @DemilichFan Unions and labor run a muck caused the crash of General Motors, not free market speculation on the price of their stock. Sustaining domestic industry is a two edged sword there must be balance in Labor and Capital. Just think of all the unions who have brought hard times on themselves. Shooting their own foot in spite.

  • @bonkeydonkable I disagree completely. UAW was certain that GM would declare Chapter 11, and yet the workers still voted for huge concessions, fearing Chapter 13 liquidation. They were promised job security, but instead GM closed 14 plants in clear breach of contract. They declared Chapter 11 and ran away with the bailout money. The workers took the junk stock, GM broke their VEBA agreement, and workers were forced to accept half of their promised benefits.

  • @DemilichFan I agree the UAW was certain GM would declare Chapter 11 or 13. The reason they were certain is they had driven GM to become uncompetitive with the other auto makers. Years of bad contracts with the UAW had taken GM to this point, plain and simple.

  • @bonkeydonkable By bad contracts you mean they should be more like the workers in Alabama, who attract foreign car manufacturers because there are no unions and they get paid close to third world wages? That would have made GM very competitive, I'm sure. You're right, they should have been more like the Toyota workers, who had no pension and no healthcare. Hell, after the 2007 agreement, starting salaries were $15/hr, which is LESS than many nonunion automakers in the south were being paid.

  • @bonkeydonkable The contracts were only bad for working people, then they got worse, then they lost their jobs. And that's what happens with unions in this country. They get squeezed until they pop. Then we wonder why it's low wages for everyone, long hours, no pensions, no benefits, no overtime, no vacation time, more injuries, more illegal firings, more temporary workers, etc etc etc. It's because unions are weak.

  • @DemilichFan I agree there is an ugly trade off that often takes place. I have to agree with the privatisation efforts of Thatcher, though. For me it is illogical to support unprofitable businesses (like coal, steel, B Leyland in Britain of the 80s) just because they give people jobs. And British unions of the 70s/80s absolutely crippled the country and made it less efficient than Germany, the US and even France. Something had to be done and Thatcher made the tough choices.

  • @negvar But it seems to me you're ignoring the full scope of benefits that nationalized industry can offer. For example, as Chomsky and others posit, a nationalized steel company may purposefully operate at a loss, because by doing so they can cheaply provide private businesses with essential products, which can in turn provide a net benefit to society at large. That option is nonexistent when you privatize everything.

  • @DemilichFan Well Chomsky is a linguist/philosopher not so much an economist. There is a place for state control in crisis periods (ie post WWII) but usually the greatest efficiency is achieved when gov't does not control means of production, and only provides legal/regulatory framework. Things like aviation are heavily subsidized but net benefit is huge. Heavy industry like steel, however, is a waste. Moving to higher value added production/service is what keeps Western economies evolving

  • @negvar Thatcher's blustering about 'doing what is necessary' was complete 'bollocks', as the Brits might say! Those policies were a total contrivance, not of hers, but of certain sectors of private power, who were, unsurprisingly, the sole beneficiaries of the policies she put in place. To talk of 'economic benefit' is claptrap when the overwhelming majority DO NOT benefit, and have not benefitted.

  • @negvar Economists understand when economies benefit, but they aren't paid to assess societal benefit at large. 'Economies' fluctuate, and economists are paid to understand (truly, to PROGNOSTICATE, for profit purposes) these fluctuations, but they fail to note when 'economies' benefit and people DON'T (eg 'economic miracle' in Mexico, the stupendous Clinton years, etc).

  • @negvar The smartest critics predicted years ago that gas prices would enter a rugged patch, which would last for a while, comprised of intermittent surges and declines in price. It was predicted (and has come to pass) that prices would surge during periods economic growth, and then decline when the economy declined. Here is the US, we're actually going on 3 straight years of 'economic growth'. Does that matter for the people? No. They're being murdered at the pump. I give you economics.

  • @DemilichFan I am interested to know where you got your degree in the Political Economy of the West. You are right that there is a fundamental disjoint between extreme growth and benefit to the masses, but there certainly are benefits. You have to remember that the masses are generally uneducated, not dynamic, and are not high-value adding. If you give too much then they have no incentive to better themselves (like here in France). My orig point was Thatcher was good is stopping the excess

  • @negvar First of all, I don't know what you mean by 'high-value adding'. It seems to me that, for better or worse, democracies are supposed to cater to the masses. In the states, the masses are overwhelmingly social democratic (they believe in social over military spending and want universal healthcare), yet both parties are well to the right of the public. All I know about the French I know from France 24, but I take it you think it's some socialist nightmare!

  • @DemilichFan You want to see motivation to achieve, do you? You should come here. Income inequality is much greater than your country. The war on the middle class is raging, and those who really struggle get no help at all. Social spending is towards the bottom of the developed world. Some states even have 'right to work' laws, which were devised to lower wages. If I were you, I'd book my flight right away. No country in the developed world has uneducated masses quite as motivated as ours!

  • LAS ISLAS MALVINAS SON ARGENTINAS!

  • MAGGIE MAGGIE MAGGIE!! OUT OUT OUT!!

  • fuckin junk

  • Name of the first song people. Any ideas, not the second song, the very first one that starts it off.

  • can you tell me wath is the name of the firts song?

  • The video has a pause at the beginning ...

  • What's the beat at the beginning and end of the trialer? It's beautiful

  • I loved this film!!

    God bless Thatcher, what a lady!!

  • meryl streep you are an amazing actress ..greetings from argentina 

  • @BsAs8Ros8Coa up the Malvinas

  • Englands fuckers. no ofense pirates.

  • Does anybody know the title of the first song? Please. :)

  • please someone tell me the name of the music that begins at 1:30

  • @ChristendomUL City of Hope by Audiomachine. Type it into youtube. :)

  • Probably no mention breaking the backs of the working man in this movie, or selling arms to right wing dictators, or putting huge sums of money into wine swilling corporate fatcats, probably tried to show her as a person and not the soul less beast she was!

  • @jmcfintona999

    Sometimes I think people in Western Europe need communism.

    After 50 years under communistic regime you will be right wing hawk.

  • @widmo05 sorry but i remember my family suffering under thatchers regime maybe u and her can go and take tea with pinochet youll be right at home with those hawks

  • @jmcfintona999

    I think you can't imagine what really means word "suffer". Rich society without any real problem.

    Thatcher support this bloody regime because it was cold war and Soviet Union try conquer hole world. Soviet Union support revolutionary movement and leaders like Che Guevara, Castro, Alliende and West support anticommunist leader like Pinochet.

  • @widmo05 A rich society which went from 50 000 homeless to 127 000, thousands unemployed while promoting corporate greed in the 'city',people struggling to make ends meat after the minimum wage was dropped miners getting their heads cracked for defending their jobs, innocent people locked up by corrupt policemen, judges and politicians, innocent people executed in the streets by the british army and paramilitary police force RUC. Not to mention support for South Africa, Kymer Rouge or Pinochet

  • That guys the dad from the borrowers :) ya

  • this film is about a terrible woman but annoyingly they choose a brilliant actress :/

  • Hmm English people all with American accents!?!??!

  • Meryl Streep always plays her roles the tee and beyond, and from what I can see she does an amazing job here.  She plays former united kingdom prime minister Margaret thatcher and her life and works and struggles as a woman trying to change a country!

    I will definitely be going to see this one !

  • Very well done! You chose the perfect music for the movie on daving.info and the editing was done very well. Bravo! Absolutely fantastic editing work. Also lots of credit for your creativity, putting these two pieces together. You captured the whole movie in 4:23 minutes!

  • @soniagregory18 its the official trailer of the movie, the youtube channel didn't actually put it together