Lawrence O'Donnell Unloads (No Pun) On The NRA For Heartless Comments

[theblackkknight1]

"killed by a gun" This dickbag really dosent get it.

[BUDx2]

NRA all the way pussies O'Donnell doesnt know anything about guns

[thegreatkurt2013]

fuck yourself it amazes me after seeing everything only today how stupid and believing people are simply because they are told to believe it gun control lost ok u admitted that the right to bear arms is an individual right but you will simply not accept defeat most of you have never even held a gun much grown up around them because if u had u probably wouldnt want to ban them u want to do what u can against them simply because u are told to think they are evil u only notice the gun not the human

[thegreatkurt2013]

to start you off fuck bloomberg he spends his states money trying to force other states to take on gun laws lets see thats out of his jurisdiction and if you new yorkers realized this u would be pissed at least i hope ur that smart and ok you can say fuck the nra but when or if the government takes away guns then stops you from publishing anything against them takes away the freedom of speech and of the press then whos going to fight for your rights? not me cause u took my gun away so you can go

[rwcbanzai]

Ponder... besides disease, machines kill people if operated negligently.

We are required by responsibility to take an vehicle operator's written & demonstrative test to operate a killing machine called an automobile to prove our competency for public safety. Need I say more about demonstrating whether someone can operate an automatic machinePistol responsibly. A soldier or police officer must take a yearly test for a license to kill, likewise no one should be above the law.

[grizzzlyjoe]

Jesus Almighty Christ ... Guns are not the problem ... wackos kill other people with cars, knives, axes, poison, Baseball bats, THEIR BARE HANDS everyday .. the problem is CRAZY people.

[KlipKultur4]

Bloomberg for President!

[RealTime88]

@KlipKultur4 I would vote for Mayor Bloomberg. He can run the greatest city in the world well for the most powerful job in the world as President, I'll vote for him if he runs.

[EscpdFrmPsykward]

@bubbiesdad Fuck no. I don't hunt. I just want to be able to collect guns of all sorts. Some historical, mostly modern: handguns, rifles, shotguns, carbines, etc. And the last thing I want is for some douche bag to come along and fuck with my collection because he thinks "high capacity" magazines are inherently evil. Fuck that shit. Run a background check on me, make me take a safety course, I have nothing to hide. The NRA doesn't want anything sensible like that. And that is where they lose me.

[MaryJesusJoseph]

The NRA doesn't worry about silly things like facts.

[Anoners]

I get the feeling Lawrence is trying to mimic, to some success, Keith's Special Comment. Either that or he's channeling that vibe.

[MaryJesusJoseph]

@Anoners Maybe, but it's a totally different vibe. Keith was more outraged--O'Donnell is more calm resolution.

[nastrobamas]

Make sure all these people get rid of their guns. I can keep mines and rule.

[eatmorenachos]

The NRA acts like it speaks for all gun owners, when in reality it speaks for all gun MAKERS, certainly not all gun owners.

[EscpdFrmPsykward]

@eatmorenachos Agreed. I am a 2nd Amendment supporter, and although I don't agree with O'Donnell's take on gun laws (cost of ammo and availability of "high" capacity magazines are NOT the problem), I agree with what he said at the beginning with Bloomberg asking congress to tighten existing gun laws and background checks. The NRA does not represent me as a gun owner. I think they are full of shit and they would fight for a child's "right" to carry an Uzi to school if they thought they could win.

[sabba03]

@eatmorenachos Nope... not all gun owners, just 4 million of them.

[eatmorenachos]

@sabba03 ,

Not even close. I have friends and relatives who hunt and are NRA members, but only one of them follows its leaders on everything. The others differ from the organization to varying degrees, supporting differing levels of restrictions.

[sabba03]

@eatmorenachos

They speak for them if they are indeed NRA members, rather or not they agree 100% with everything, which is seldom the case with anything. Nonetheless, you said they do not speak for gun owners, but 4 million gun owners are NRA members... thats a fact. They do not speak for all gun owners, but 4 million, yes. Therefore, you cannot say they are only a voice for a makers, or else noone would join the NRA. If your family does not like the NRA, why are they members?

[eatmorenachos]

@sabba03 , the NRA doesn't speak for them on ALL ISSUES.

The NRA's official positions are 100 percent in lockstep with the gun makers----but not the NRA's membership.

[sabba03]

@eatmorenachos

Haha ok buddy. I still hold that if they were THAT far off, people would not join. Lucky for me.. we are getting our way.. you are not.

[seamoremonster]

Good on you Lawerence.  These bastards who scream loudest about their guns are the very lunatics who shouldn't have them. NRMA stoking the fires of paranoia.

[Hybrid5784]

Just you wait, the "responsible" gun-nuts over at the NRA will call for O'Donnell's head. What else do you expect cowards like them to do, be rational?

[dizzymasekela]

Way to go Lawrence. Even Olbermann never reamed the NRA. Fuck the NRA.

[FixedNewsChannel]

@dizzymasekela - Sure Keith Olbermann did. Just a couple I could find with a quick search.

here - watch?v=c53-cGnuk84

here - watch?v=TNjUSc6rAKM

[gggreggg]

@dizzymasekela hi

i think that Olbermann has done truth-telling vis-a-vis NRA, but i would have to check the archives to know for sure.