SU-30 MKI
4:30
Added: 3 years ago
From: waranalyst4u
Views: 7,611
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I have never seen these photos.Where did you find Them?

  • Re most of the photos from Airforce base Pune?

  • there is nothing much agaist pakistan b/c pak is best see it ur self on defence.pk

  • Como se llama la cancion?.... Waht name music is?

  • Why do u want us to hate Himesh?

  • Caray no sabia que podria cargar 12 misiles aire-aire "impresionante" ..

  • su 30

    big plane

    big area of radar crossection

    big area of detection. useless plane....

    WORDS NOT BY ME BY UR AMERICAN FRIENDS AT NELLIS...

    SWEEET CAKE FOr BVR MISSILES OF JF17 THUNDER OR F16s...................

  • @sarmad9072 This plane isn't bigger than F-14 or F-15, still they are considered as the best of air superiority fighters.

    Plane's radar crossection is not depended only by it's size.

    Bottom line, your comment is stupid. Oh, not... it is not your comment, but your stupid american friends from Nellis.

    Bottom line

  • @BitnikGr truth hurts my friend.AMERICANS ARE PROFESSIONAL IN THESE THINGS INSTEAD OF FIGHTING WITH ME INDIANS MUST FOCUS ON THESE DRAWBACKS.

  • @sarmad9072 which truth? I gave you facts that SU-30 is smaller than F-14 and F-15. And if SU-30 is a "sweet cake" then what Tomcat and Eagle are?

    Especially if we take in mind that 30years later composite materials and wave absorbtion paints are much wider used in SU-30 than in F-14 and F-15.

    Do you know the exact value of "sigma" of those planes? If you don't know exact numbers, then stick to your "friends" words. But it cannot be called truth, but just rumors.

  • @sarmad9072 "Americans are professionals" - no doubt. But rest of the world are amateurs? French? European? Russian? They are banch of amateurs of course... SU-30, SU-37, MiG-35, Rafale, Mirage 2000-5, EF-2000 are not work of thousands of professionals in many fields... right?

  • @BitnikGr ALL THOSE YOU HAVE MENTIONED HAVE MADE ANY THING LIKE F22 RAPTOR,F35 LIGHTNING OR SOME THING LIKE B-2 SPIRIT.THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE IN THE PROFESSIONAL APPROACH BETWEEN AMERICAN ENGINEERS AND REST OF THE WORLD.

  • @sarmad9072 The big difference is not in professional approach... they all are top professionals in their fields! The big difference really is in budget. Bigger budgets allow more resources, more scientific research, more tests, more scientific personel, which of course leads to technological advantage. But underestimating scientists of other countries calling them amateurs (non professionals) is totally wrong, my friend.

  • @BitnikGr The F-22 and F-35 are fifth generation stealth fighters, the only ones on the world. It is not useful to compare "professionalism" to new technology. The Japanese Zeros were professionally made, but were obsolete by the end of WWII. The SU-30 and Mirage 2000, etc. are simply unable compete with them.

  • @scottadler With you I can agree. Technological advantage and professionalism of engineers are totally different thing. Engineers, designers and other scientific staff is on the same professional level in most leading countries. But budget and technological advance is not equally the same. That's why some go ahead, some other stay behind.

    All WW II fighters became obsolete to the end of war, since the jet era began.

  • @scottadler The last sentence is arguable.

    "They are unable to compete with them" why? In order to compete with one mean you have to develop an object with better same mean, or to develop an object with sufficient counter-mean! In our case. In order to compete with stealth fighter one have to create fighter with even better stealth OR to create good enough anti-stealth technologies.

    F.e. figtherA has a RCS of 0.1 and radar which can see object with RCS 0.9 at 100km. FighterB has RCS 0.9, but ...

  • @scottadler ... it has radar which can see objects with RCS 0.1 at 100km. As, you see, they will see each other about at the same distance and at the same time.

    There is already a program for APG-77 upgrade, because Lockheed Martin saw that till 2015 its abilities will be surpassed by European and Russian AESA radars.

    With that upgrade F-22 will still have an upper hand. But I am very doubtful about how succesfull F-35 will be...

  • @sarmad9072 If you can do it then do it. Dont talk only. For your information 20 of them are enough for you. You ass hole bastard.

  • @aamit24 then why didn't u attacked after26/11 with those 20,it requires a brave heart a lion heart , not cow piss drinkers like u people,You ass hole bastard.

  • @sarmad9072 because u already have a war within ur country and if india attacked at same time u would have been wiped by now. but u should say thanks to ur ally US who was holding us back to lash at u.

  • the video is good but not the song u could hav given vande matram

  • this is a slide show, not a video, put it on a photo hosting website not u tube!!!!

  • One of the Best Directed Videos on SU MKI -30. Some credit to Himesh for Noisy Music like SU Engine.

  • QUICK JOKE. HIMESH SHUD BE MADE TO TAKE A RIDE inside a su-30mki. then probably he will start to sing with his mouth then nose. gr8 video. himesh cracks me up. he rocks though.

  • GUD JOB

  • Is it the next FGFA that India is developping with Russia?

  • Impressive video! I like Su-30

  • dope

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more