Added: 3 years ago
From: DodgeSRTKiller
Views: 85,654
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (301)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i like how ppl buy things for their OWN car and somebody else tells them they waste money or shouldnt do it. how fucking fun would it be if the whole world had the same car dickheads...... i rather have a rustang over any other. way i see it is when my check goes direct deposit fuck what nebody say i buy what i want

  • I'll donate $20.00 for a new camera that doesn't skip have the footage!

    X)

  • too bad the camaro and the mustang don't even count as muscle cars anymore... they're american wanna be tuners. the loads of bullshit the spew out of a camaro owner is beyond this world...

  • I think calling yourself an SRT8killer is funny considering you have a twin screw S3. There are SRT8 Grand Cherokees with similar mods to your mustang running 11 seconds flat and thats an SUV. We all know how crappy stock Rustang GT's are so I guess I can't blame you for putting all that money into it, but its like shining a turd imo.

  • @lacrymist1976 I didn't know it was possible for someone to be so dumb. Holy shit. Learn something new every day!

  • @TroutButter Yawn.. that’s the best you can do? Guess I shouldn’t expect much from a Ford lover.

  • Comment removed

  • Challenger is one beast, but mopars arent like what they used to be. Only because these new muscle cars are called gas guzzlers and shit like that. STUPID PEOPLE ON DRUGS SAYING GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL OR BEING GREEN BULLSHIT. I know because my uncle was taxed the hell out of when he had his plymouth road runner liscensed to drive on the road and his emissions test was rated a 1 for realeasing "SMOG" (wtf?) and i guess if some people have their way we'll all be driving those P.O.S. hybrids. =P

  • Stupid video

    The shittang had a head start..

  • @D1am0nd77 no he didnt, your just upset that he won

  • @D1am0nd77 Yet another butt hurt mopar sore loser. Or...just loser. Yeah, that's more accurate.

  • @TroutButter Who's mad? 

  • Dont you people have anything better to do than get on here and argue back and forth on who is better Ford, Dodge, Chevy, Pontiac...It don't matter who you say is better..What really matters is what you can do with it on the track and if the driver knows what in the hell they are doing and can actually drive the car.

  • i like how the mustang had a fukin twin screw intercooled KB WITH stage III auto and only ran an 11.85. my friends t/a runs an 11.90 with nothing but a cam and pully kit. why cant people understand bang for your buck doesnt apply to mustangs???

  • nowhere near a fair race adding a KB vs minor NA bolt ons

  • Dude I have a magnum RT and I have NEVER ever lost to a dustang oh I am lying I lost to my 88 5.0 paxtonsupercharger bored .30 over 302 stroker but it's not an everyday driver my magnum has borla exhaust predator chip slp longtube headers 2600 toruqe converter volant c.a.i 435whp 490wft next i am putting on the stroker kit and sts kit you can't see my rt

  • @MrHookups09

    i wish i could give you multiple thumbs up.

  • that was the worst video ever

  • is that so..

  • this is true i have a Ws6 stock and have never lost to a gt stock or modded mustangs suck

  • Its funny because he says a stronger engine for the challenger rt when it has a 5.7 hemi with 375 horsepower when the gt has a 4.6 with 315

  • LOL yeah right! You forgot to mention that this wasnt a stock on stock race. The GT would never ever outrun a challenger stock. LOL....

  • @bigjay23834

    the GT wouldn't beat an SRT8 stock, no

    but an R/T, easily.

  • @Trollensteinowitz It's funny how people act like a truck or a car is human. LOL.........Anybody can mod a vehicle to go faster than it does stock. Some people seem to not have the common sense to know that. I'm not taking sides or anything but if the GT had a bunch of work done to it I'm sure it could beat a challenger. Vice versa....Hell my 04' Lightning is about 460 hp with 550 torque. I smoke alot of people on the road but I know my truck is not the fastest.

  • @Trollensteinowitz weeeeell thats debateable... dodge specs the rt at slower times than many people have reported it

  • @jgto17

    um so?

    I'm not talking about bench racing faggot numbers I'm talking about real life.

  • @Trollensteinowitz

    dude i have charger R/T and its stock

    and my other frend have a mustang GT with borla ... and guess what

    i fuck hes ass all the time

    so dude !!! ford sucks :D

    i only respect ford when they say SUPERCHARGE

    otherwise Ford sucks dude

  • @mejawmeyaw

    That's nice. we all know your car can't beat his lol

    He might suck at driving, but your car sucks at moving, flat out.

    R/T's are slow, and remain slow until someone changes the shitty engine in there to something stronger.

  • R/Ts are slow.... have you ever seen a mustang try move? unless it is a cobra or has a supercharger with more mods it is slow

  • hahaha but the new 5.0 ran a 127 @ 112 mph no stock camaro or challenger ever ran them numbers

  • Actually the new camaro SS has gotten those numbers, stock@Dmbnigga4life

  • @mejawmeyaw ew you fuck your friends ass all the time? gross dude. and don't try to brag about your charger when it'll only do 60 in 5.9 sec and weighs 4400 pounds. doesn't sound like a very "high performance" sedan to me.

  • just try to buy v8 man !!! HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAH

  • @bigjay23834 I agree.....I own a Lightning and I smke GT's all fuckin day! I test drove a SRT8 with the vortech supercharger on it last Saturday and that car was FAST!!!!!! It was like 550 hp. It was black on black with black rims. It was a beast! The torque was bad.....I would go like 40 mph and hit the gas and it would fishtail. That was my only issue. He said he would give me 16K for my 04' Lightning. The challenger was 37K. I am thinking about it!

  • :O um quick question was this in calgary,alberta?

  • lame, the challenger driver sucks

  • is pontiac still in production or did they drop those... relized it was a waste of time and money... about time the government made a good decision.. LOL

  • they did

  • thanks for pretty much proving my point... my car is the joke when its 50 horse less horse and 1.4 litre's smaller and still beating gtos with your classic intake and exhaust mod.. no shit im gonna have to mod it, its another 100 horse less. it is SAD when yout government made peice of shit runs low to high 13's.. that car is was just a bunch of scrap thrown together.. and a 390 horse cobra runs high twelves... tell me why your 400 horse car can to that.falling on its face right from the burnout

  • what you said made no sense

  • LOL. GTO's are a joke. i have beatin many with my 08 gt. about 350-360 horse at the crank with stock gears.(3.55)

  • I believe your car is a joke when you have to mod it to beat a stock GTO

    mod for mod and stock for stock the GTO would rape a GT mustang no problem.

  • @prowler10393 yeah GT mustangs are slow ass fuck a nismo 370Z is even faster then a GT

  • @707umair

    dude that car would beat a lot of cars... haha.

  • @626Charlie I know the 370z is sick!... but it's N/A V6 and the mustang is a N/A V8 i mean the mustang should be faster just shows how slow the mustang is

  • stangs gt are shit...dodge and pontiac rip ford's ass specially pontiac g8 and challenger

  • welll the gto has a 400 hp ls2 beezy. mustang has 300 IF that year. lmao. and i think a termi cobra can run high 12s just fine thanks. STOCK

  • go look for a 2010 on slicks run a 12.9

  • you know its pretty sad when a 6.1 can only run a 13.2 stock when a 4.6 can run 13.5 stock...it you put it as power per liter the mustang is a better built engine

  • actually GTO do 0-60 in 4.6 and quater in 13 flat or in a 4spd auto high 12...iv never seen a stock GT come close to those numers.

  • I have, 2010 Mustang GTs are hitting high 12 second 1/4 times with the factory 3.73s ;)

  • ...not trying to start anything...but im gonna say that u r wrong...and im not being an ass...mustangs (New ones) are bad ass...315HP at the crank...i can respect that....but i go to the track at atco almost every tuesday and fri. night...and i have seen a fair amount of 2010 GTs...but i have never...ever seen a stock come close to 12s....the best i think iv ever seen in a stock is 13.3...and this dude knew how to drive like a champ

  • with the optional 3.73s?

  • dont know....but i honestly dont think it would make too much of a difference....again rlly not trying to start something...thats just what iv seen

  • I know, I'm just having a friendly debate, and yes 3.73s make a HUGE difference :)

  • hmmm...well maybe they do...hmmmm well if i ever see a stock mustang run in the 12s ill ask him on his way back wat ratio hes got

  • #1 a gto weights more then anything..lol and it dont do 4.6.. more like 4.9.

    #2 high 12's.. LMFAO. you and i both no your not doin that stock.. lol ive heard low to mid 13's depending on driver and a 4.6 3v does a 13.4 13.5... lets see what other stupid cars gm can make.. just like gto only lasted a few years... so will g8

  • hmmmm these new cars like the challenger SRT8 and charger SRT8 and that new Taures all have one thing in common...they all r fricken boats...they weigh too much...the mustangs honestly have a good power vs. weight balance going...but my fav. is the LS2 GTOs...i own one ...check the vids. i have 100more horsepower than them and when i do race a mustang GT its usually kinda close...for 300hp theyll beat one the challenger R/T and charger R/T s

  • i drive an 05 mustang GT, but the GTO should smoke a stock GT, i bought it for the looks and sound and enough power for any 23 year old kid

  • yeah, they do look pretty badass, my only problem is that you seem them everywhere...i like originality, and yeah the GTs exhaust does have a healthy rumble

  • yes, GTO is a a good car, only issue is, looks, no offense but that car have no style. I've driven them, they are fun and fast, but they also feel heavy.

  • yeah, but what they do lack in looks they certainly make up in performance

  • no doubt there

  • The Mustang weighs about 1000+ pounds less than the Challenger. Give the Challenger about a 150 shot of gas on top of what it already has and it MIGHT beat the Mustang....lol

  • like always ford wins dont cry it's real like always.............

  • seriously? lol mustangs would be my last pick for american car.. would deff. pick vette 1st then a challenger

  • The only way a challenger Rt will beat a mustang Gt is if the stang owner has three fat girls in his ride. lol

  • dude the mustang had a freakin twin screw super charger and the challenger only had like exhaust and crap!!! plus i think it was an r/t model.

  • dude..the challenger got a frickin 6.1 hemi versus a 4.6 modular...what do u expect..and that was a srt8..just face it MUSTANGS are the BEST!!

  • a FORCED INDUCTION 4.6 modular.... put a twin screw on that 6.1 and try again. that mustang run a high 13 to a 14 sec quarter before the supercharger....Challenger/Cha­rger's run 13.2 stock

  • At least the Challenger is still sexier looking than that ugly ass mustang. Ive seen the new camaro ss and they're just as ugly as the mustang. Challenger ROCKS!!

  • @onefionechico im sure the mustang driver thought so too when he looked in his rear view mirror at it hahahahaha

  • @onefionechico Ugly? No not quite. You're just a butt hurt douche bag fan boy grabbing for cheap shots that aren't even valid in the first place. Get used to seeing the tails of the Mustang. That's all you'll be seeing for a loooong time.

  • @TroutButter lol you must be a new mustang fanboy. Go cry to your mommy that bought you your Pisstang. Have a nice day :)

  • I had the Mustang out at the track last night. It was running really hard but the track was slippery, so i couldnt get good traction. It still ran an 11.57 on street tires and rims hot lapping it.

    There were two Dodges there. One was a purple Challenger R/T. he ran 14.6 and thena black Charger SRT ran an 14.6 also. I was not impressed with those cars but I think both were stock.

  • Both the R/T and SRT8 run faster then that. Stock the SRT8 Charger should run low 12's high 11's in the quarter and the Challenger R/T should run 12.5 or so depending on transmissions. (5 spd auto or 6 spd tremec). The GT Mustang does weigh significantly less and stock is a little quicker but 14's are rediculious on an R/T and especially an SRT8. Take it from a Dodge salesman who know what these cars can do!!!

  • no sir the r/t runs a mid 13 with the new mustang gt and the srt runs a low 13

  • never trust a cars salesman!!!!!! the srt runs 13.8 quarter at 103 flat. the charger is more like a yacht looks good but not very fast.

  • Wow never trust a car salesman? Never trust a FUCKEN idiot on the computer with an opinion either. The SRT 8 Challenger STOCK is rated at 13.3/.25 mile without burning out the tires. A true proffesional can get high 12's out of a stock SRT8. So yes I was a little off in my assessment. The Charger is a 4 door sports/muscle car. Something Ford doesn't have yet but will wilth the SHO Taurus that will get it's ass handed to it by the Charger. When it does come out.

  • the taurus rival its the g37 not charger but okay yes it would kick its ass. and google challenger srt8 quarter mile and notheing below 13.6 will pop up. and the g8 witch sadly isnt around anymore can kick the chargers ass.

  • The SHO Taurus will be a 368 HP 4 dr. sedan. With all due respect people who shop that car will shop it with a Charger R/T and vice versa. If your only point of reference is what you read on the internet then you also need to quit sending me these messages and commenting because you are a FUCKTARD. So go Google dipshit and see how often your pic shows up. Oh yes nice profile page with a queer bate Lotus.

  • ur on crack no stock srt8 charger is gonna run a low 12s or high 11s sounds like ur living a dream!

  • agreed. From the factory it's a 13sec car at best due to weight issues. Now throw in a supercharger or turbo kit and you'll hit 11's with proper tuning. Port the heads and throw in a good cam and you'll have more.

  • damn a older mustang can out runn them wtf if challengers didnt weigh so much then it would be a bad machine

  • @DodgeSRTKiller Type in "SRT8 jeep 9.65 Pass by L.P.M" into search and let me know if that impresses you.

  • @lacrymist1976 ther is always a car faster then mine, his, yours, they all impress me. the challengers are a nice looking car but need some help to go a bit faster, the guys mustang needed help to go faster, my mustang needed alot of help to go faster. and im sure they spent a small fortune to make the jeep go that fast. not impressed by a neon srt or cobalt ss junk whit ric . do you hate people who have a ford?i just hate people who hate,dont be a auto raciest. it could be a hate crime one day

  • @sinister99gt No, just dont like people who post a video of a basic canned tune srt8 with headers getting beat by a twin screw mustang and then calling themselves SRTKiller.

  • That Challenger ran like CRAP! Who ever was driving it doesnt deserve that car. 13 flat for a modded SRT Challenger? I've seen a STOCK Challenger R/T run 12.7-12.8 What a moron this guy driving the Challenger is, not saying it would have won with the Mustang running 11.8s but it still should have been closer.

  • its cuz the challenger is automatic

  • ok put a stock challenger r/t against a mustang gt please. Fucked Over Rebuilt Dodge.

  • horrible camera work

  • yeah mustang got lucky now i just saw a challenger and corveet and dodge one mustang sucks

  • For the price difference between the challenger and the mustang the challenger sucks nutts.

  • i like all the dodge fags bitching because there 6.1 got beat by a 4.6. YEAH its boosted... but its just putting itself at the same or close to the Hp the challenger has. AND WHO WON? MUSTANG!!!

  • boost makes a big difference dipshit. 2 cars of equal hp yea probably, but if one has forced induction and the other is naturally aspirated who the fuck do you think is gonna win?

  • my TT SRT8 sittin in the garage will walk all over any RUSTANG u put in front of it...

    ITS TRUE, U JUST CANT 1-UP A DODGE!!

  • tt challenger? lmao if u could afford that surely you could afford a camera to make a vid for us to laugh at, but i dont see any vids on ur page so im highly doubting the tt srt8. fucking noob

  • Mustangs Rule the Muscle Car series! The new Camaro is next! Bring it on Cheby fans!

  • for the faggots that dont no shit the challenger has 425 hp stock with the mods that they list in the video its gaining a minimum of 50 hp so that puts it at 475 hp now the stock stang has 300 hp with the addtional kb superchager which will put it around the same as the challenger so for all u rejects saying its not fair cause of the kb suck a dick and a perfect example is the challenger srt8 competing with the ford mustang bullitt 425 hp vs 315 add 110 hp to the stang and see who will win

  • Another ford fucking goof off comparison Supercharger 2 no supercharger fucking compare a supercharged Challenger to ur pony car rustang and see what comes threw your vents Faggel MOPAR OR NO CAR!

  • well put! mopar or no car!!! i wish i could get my parts at walmart like these gm and ford bitches!

  • wOow eL challengeR es wOooW!!!

    nada le gana le pese a quien le pese

  • 13.0 for a Challanger SRT? Sounds stock or a really bad driver.

    And as for the mustang, its supercharged. I could beat anyone to if i had a supercharger on my gocart.

    Put that same huffer on thet SRT it would kick that mustangs butt.

  • Dammit mother fucker in the Challenger!!!!! You shamed us mopar people. I shall cast you into the lake of fire!!

    I will get my 1968 Dodge Charger R/T out there and i will blow that ford out of the water >:O

  • he has a supercharger!! HE DID GOOD FOR THAT CHEAPASS KENNE BELL FAGGET

  • The driver of the Challenger obviously doesnt know squat about drag racing.

  • yea Mustang 4 life :) lol

  • cabron latino vete a hablar mal a otro lado q lo traduzca tu madre..

  • Miren bola de putos todos hablan del nuevo camaro k va a chingar al mustang, primero esperense a k salga a la venta y luego veremos, ya k para toda esa bola de cabrones k son chevymaniacos, FORD les tiene una gran sorpresa con el mustang 2010... Y si no entienden traduscanlo...

  • Who cares, you can't even buy the Mustang and there are millions of them on the rode, why worry about the new Camaro then?

    May be Chevy should bring back the El Camino, that will spring up the demand for chevy,,,Not!

  • camaro is only going to be limited sold they stopped prodution at about 30k cars

  • you dont know shit...the comaro is going to be released in october!!(says chevys website!!)...and a fully equiped comaro SS will cost you around 40 grand, just like the last gens...sorry bud....go play some halo.

  • dude the ceo of ford said that dodge was better than them i herd it all on tv so ford is not better than dodge so shove it

  • The mustang is better than the challenger.

    The F-150 is better than the Ram. The Focus is better than the Neon.

    The SRT8 can beat the 6cyl Mustang though. Watch that race. Its here on U-tube.

  • the camaro is better and faster then mustang

    the silverado is stronger and get's better MPG then F-150

    the malibu has better MPG and looks better then focus

    the new 2010 v6 camaro has the same HP number as the mustang Gt, sadly.

  • the Silvarado? that isnt what motortrend said mutha fucka!!!

    f150 GETS 21 MPG...silvarado gets 21

    F150 gets 320hp and 360 ft lbs

    Silverado gets 315hp and 332 ft/lbs.

    that info is from ford and chevys website...the 5.4 to the 5.3

    the camaro also costs 10 grand more...with the 10 grand i saved i could drop either a crazy forced induction package...or a crate motor...and stomp your camaro.

    The mustang stomps the shit out of the impalla(chevys only comparable vehicle)

  • the camaro cost just 30g for a camaro ss 2010, lol, and mustang cost 28g for the mustang gt, so its not really "10 grand" more, lmao..and mustang barely can beat a impala, like seriously, but yea the camaro will be coming in dealers like in a few days now and yes it will be faster then mustangs AGAIN, even the 2002 camaro z28 is faster then the current 2009 mustang gt, sadly..

  • Comment removed

  • Chevy is broke, Bye Bye chevy bye bye.

  • atleast camaro's still beat mustangs, lol.

  • why would you even compare a malibu and a focus?

    at least when comparing automakers compare cars with the same platform.

    Compare the malibu and the Fusion or the Taurus. The Fusion gets 41 mpg and looks just as nice or better than the malibu.

  • wow, you are going to post the whole staging and everything then crop the actual drag? what a tool.

  • I own both cars a 97 intrepid and a 07 mustang v6. intrepid has no chance in hell againts a mustant.

  • So what type of Mustang are you going against? Lx's (4.0) Because I don't think you'd have a chance in hell beating a GT with your intrepid. And if you did the driver didn't know wtf they were doing so you can't take much glory from that kind of win.

  • trentonrucle ur fucking stupid

    ur shitty ass 97 dodge beat a mustang in youre dreams ass hole... mustangs are badd ass wtf u talking about

  • The racer on the challenger didnt bring it to its potential. A mustang Bullitt cant beat an SRT8, i fail to see how a GT could. The only way the GT would win, is if it was HEAVILLY modified, and there wasnt anything special posted.

  • Did you read the mods on either car or is reading English beyond? Seriously pay more attention. SRT8 Challengers are mid 13 second cars which are about on par with a 5-speed Mustang GT.

  • no, actually the challenger srt 8 runs a 13.2 stock, and a mustang gt runs maybe a 13.8

  • The Mustang had a Kenne Bell supercharger. Easily bringing it's horsepower up to the 450 rwhp range depending on tuning. With the GT at about 3,450 lbs, and the Challenger at 4,100 pounds, the GT had a MUCH greater advantage over the Challenger.

  • Challengers seem to lose every race posted on youtube. They start slow every time. Doesn't matter though, I'm still gonna find a way to get one. They're pretty sweet, and I'm not a racer, I'm a pacer.

  • the srt8 isnt going to sell at all....the mustang gt isnt even a specialty car like the srt8 is and it got beat....i cant even imagine if a gt500kr went up against that thing. gotta hand it to ford because my gt is a champ

  • this isnt a srt hemi

  • lol yeah it is look at the numbers usaul stock gt may run high 13teens this is modified and a convertable

  • Actually it is an SRT8. Please check your brain for malfunction. Did you look at the car or are you basing this statement on your own little fantasy?

  • and ,,even flow'' in the background by Pearl Jam! marvelous

  • I think challenger is better

  • IS a stock chally faster than a stock mustang??

  • yes.

  • Well honestly the best part of this race was the guy who owned the Challenger had a real attitude. My Mustang looks pretty sleeper and he thought he was going to spank the little Mustang GT.

    As you see the results were not what he expected!

  • Performance wise the new Camaro is supposed to run mid-low 13's depending on motor. We'll have to see on looks but the Challenger looks the best. Sorry, but the majority of Mustang sales are WOMEN buying the base six.  Look it up. Ford isn't afraid to admit it.

  • Yup, the Challenger had over $2,500 in mods and still ran that bad?? Who did the work??

    Long tube headers/exhaust, torque converter, tune, etc?!?! Plus the dealer mark up puts the price in the mid-forties. A "turd" stock $30,000 LS2 GTO runs mid-low 13's stock. Even the "heavier" G8 runs 13.60's -70's.

  • wait wait a pontiac g8 runs in the 13!! says who????

  • Yup, on a SEA LEVEL track. A hundred degree day and if the driver doesn't know what he is doing and power brakes too hard and spins the tires it won't. A good tuner(there's plenty of bad ones) will be able to knock 4 tenths just by re-curving the torque management and upping the shift points so it doesn't shift into 4th gear too soon and kill the time. Average times should be 13:70's-80's bone stock. Most of the mags show this(the real ones) and check out last years "GMHIGHTECHPERFORMANCE".

  • Also go to the track and see who can drive. The G8 GXP runs 13:00's - 13:30's and this is from one of the slower mags like "Road and Track".

    They're ATI Procharged ones too with nothing else done but the system running 11 flat at almost 130MPH. Tens might be possible with more boost but the trans might not.

    They tested the same system and boost level on the SRT8 and it only ran a high eleven.

    this was done by ATI so there is no bias.

  • FlatoutDodge, again, you failed to see the modifications on the Chally listed. REMEMBER..the FAT SRT8 starts OUT with 425, the Mustangs mods just even that out then factor in the MODS the CHALLY had and presto, not a horribly weighted race. And BTW, the Chally looks better than the new Camaro, but the Mustang looks better than both, just check the sales numbers.

  • ya but you cant compare a mustang gt to an srt8 you compare it to the R/T a gt500 would smoke the srt-8 there slow for having a 6.1L hemi but they do look badass

  • yeah..the challenger has exhaust and intake..the mustang is supercharged..if they were both stock..challenger wins..if they both had the same mods..challenger wins..looks..challenger wins..space and comfort..challenger.. =]

  • who gives a fuck if the mustang was modded. it was the top of the line challenger vs a gt. what do you think would have happened if they had the gt500 vs the challenger srt8?? well lets just say it wouldn't be pretty for the challenger

  • Plain and simple, the challenger has so much more style that i'd go for it over the mustang any day. I don't plan on racing to the grocery store anyway....

  • well the challenger was basicly stock runnin a 13. now i'v never heard of any stock GT pullin 11s haha. so if they both had the same mods, the challenger would've raped. so its got the looks and the speed=)

  • Surprising eh?

  • yeah is the true the challenger is the real muscle car i love mopar!

  • I swear..the Challenger is garbage

  • volvoguy says"The only REAL mans car is a Volvo!"

  • lmao

  • wow. honestly I thought the Challenger was faster. and im a Mustang guy, thats dissapointing after watching 4 videos of the challenger getting its ass kicked by a mustang i've come to realize..the mustang is better. im really suprised

  • The challenger is faster, the video says the mustang is moded, supercharger and all. based on the time the challerger is bone stock, cheers

  • i didnt notice that thans, but i still seen a bunch of videos where the mustang still beat the Challenger and the mustang was stock

  • Rath, I guess you missed the cold air intake, the tune and the exhaust on the Chally. HP wise, these cars are probably close. Chally is a big fat pig and lost.

  • HP wise they are not close, stock GT is 300hp, stock challenger is 425. you toss a kenne bell on a gt and your well over 400hp in a much lighter car. even if the challenger had headers and a tune and a intake it wouldnt matter, but again based on the time its bone stock.

  • The mods are listed on the video. Are you trying to say it wasnt modded? The Mustang GT put 512 RWHP down on a 3800 pound car. The Chally with mods maybe has 400 RWHP (guestimate) and weighs 500 pounds more. The Challenegr could not run this 13.0 without mods.

  • Yes over 2 weeks ago i said this challenger was stock and ill stick by that, im sure not taking your word for it considering you cut off the end of the video. if you say the dodge ran 13 seconds then i say its stock and anyone who goes to a strip will tell ya the same thing, srt8s of any kind are 13s cars all day long

  • 'dodgesrtkiller' even ur name is pathetic, let me guess u r a frustrated ford owner who claims to own all the srts on the earth with ur shitstangs. b4 opening ur ass plz think a bit, chally has 425hp STOCK, so as EMxeros said, the stang was realy tuned up.

  • im sure he is a SRTkiller cuz i never see thoes heavy challenger beat mustangs

  • Mustangs are nice, and if you are going to compare a mustang to a challenger srt8 compare the mustang gt500 because it is around the same price actually less with more hp and less weight. The gt500 beats the srt8 just so you know.

  • but wat about the people who dont want a car that every one else has?

  • Not too many people have mustang gt's let alone gt500s. At least here in minnesota.