911-TOTAL PROOF that bombs were planted

[mtlindale]

Just like the federal building in Oklahoma, demolition it wasn't a truck filled with explosive.

[Audascity1]

They Lied to Us!! Demolition at it's Finest!!

[willkill08]

How is any of this evidence?? It's just clips from news stations, just coz they're saying it doesn't make it true...

[getovsvk]

9/11 was again proved as a controlled demolition, danish scientists found a nanothermite in the dust of wtc

/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o

[mdiem]

what?

[mdiem]

sorry, still don't see any evidence of bombs there.

care to try again?

[mdiem]

So... when does the proof start?

[wilsonpwt]

After researching both sides of the issue and seeing the deception behind "weapons of mass destruction", finding out that false flag attacks are more common than not, financing both sides of a war really does happen, and all the legislation which has been passed in order to "protect" us against terror, it really doesn't seem to be too much of a stretch to doubt the validity of the 9/11 Commision Report.

[19arc7O]

There is too much evidence: USAF standing down, insider trading, Bush not being whisked away by secret service, illogical changing of hands of the buildings leases for the first time in their existence--just in time for this staged false flag op., to believe the unbelievable fable of 19 Allah-chanting flunkie-pilots.

Follow the money trail". Silverstein, for one, has sued for a total of almost 20 billion dollars to date. Look at Chaney's co. Look at the cost of this lie/war

AE911TRUTH org

[dfelts2323]

Damn. So the terrorist planted bombs inside the buildings as well.. And this video is the proof... Thanks for this video.

[APReserruction]

SORRY !!

SHAME on you USA

[APReserruction]

Only 2 building and this is what they have done !

what about MILLION of people and hundred of hundred of PALESTINIAN house !!

Share on you USA !

[rhbweitwerjew]

veloce just got done smoking an ounce of crack most likely.

[FigthForFreedom]

anyone is a nut jop to think it was a coverup get out of your room get a woman or a man and do somethin.

stop thinking the goverment is after you!

[dilbertgeg]

FigthForFreedom - stop thinking the goverment is after you!

---

I do not think govt is after me personally. Top foreign policy leaders STATED IN WRITING that it was NECESSARY for their VITAL plans for US hegemony that America be hit with a "lucky" and "catastrophic and catalyzing event" like "Pearl Harbor". 200 or so ppl were in think tanks, Pentagon advisors, Nat Security experts WANTED a bloodbath on US soil to convince Americans to back wars.

No one mentions that 9-11 was POLICY!

[FigthForFreedom]

no but your all still bakas saying it was are goveremnt with no proofs only rumors and conspiercys while the real colperates were caugth with hard ass evidence you still a loser spreading bullshit becues you cant except the truth their has to be all terniative to.

[amandirect]

US government/CIA/Mossad/FBI/The international news all played their part in 9-11.. its a fact.. we can prove it n we have the evidence.

and you my friend, you need to go back to school and retake your spelling lessons..

[FigthForFreedom]

And my friend you need to accpet reality and i dont double check my spelling and ROLF im still in school and no more then you bakas 30 year olds who dont no their head form their ass

[amandirect]

you sucked at spelling.. dude~ you shud sack your english teacher quick..

[dilbertgeg]

I don't usually comment on spelling, but most 2nd grade kids can spell better than you, so you not are smart enough to comprehend "rumors and conspiercys" from facts. Did you know one MOST COMMON prosecutions in USA is for "conspiracy"?

It is an ABSOLUTE FACT -- not unsubstantiated rumor -- that top Pentagon & Intell officials OPENLY PUBLISHED statements about a VITAL NEED for America to be hit hard with a terror operation, like "Pearl Harbor", in 1999 - 01. It's in Congressnal Record too.

[Veloce3]

In order 2 fully understand the mechanics of this atrocity,you need 2 understand the mechanics of Power & Governance.Its the only way U can apply a fair,balanced & accurate view of what happened.Clearly,this was extremely well planned,but it had a reliance on the deep ignorance of the underline situation in our political system.When consideration is given to all of the evidence,not just the manipulated movie of events on that day,the motivation,means & opportunity leads directly 2 the Gov/Elite

[Veloce3]

Where R the Eng's(Tit Steel-Rsrch it's ability 2 endure)in all of the collisions,there is NO legitimate trace.Why are some of the HJ's still alive.How can a passport survive the inferno/devastation and conveniently introduce itself.Why was molten steel present.Why were the planes not intercepted.Why were important witness's omitted from reports.Why these targets and not more devastating ones.Why NO legitimate plane from Pent strike & on & on .Its your prerogative to B deceived.Many will oblige

[mastainventa]

look at this vid. 9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center's Collapse Explained

[drunknbaztard]

I was there during the collapse and there were minor explosions on lower levels of the bldg also my father helped build those towers the buildings imploded those towers were made to with stand severe weather even a tornado f5 level those planes would not have made the towers implode perfectly like that. but whocares nothing will ever be done about it just like all us history...sandcreek massacre of native americans kennedy martin luther king malcom x .....you cant stop the money machine.

[djbiggyb]

i know you're probably gonna dismiss this, but the U.S goverment planned and attacked the towers. then they could declare war on iran. all so that the U.S. economy can destroy itself. thats why they say that "america will be taken over without a single shot." you decide.

[Godpleaser77]

I was told that little witches were in there and that they had little bombs straped to there back. Ounce given the ok from the President. They started the timers on the bombs and flew from the building on there brooms.

I am sorry but foolishness begets foolishness.

How can you people buy into this garbage?

Don't hate me because I am right!

[alastairblakepeters]

if you investigate, and want the truth, I think you will come closer to finding it. compare America's actions to previous nations, even huge nations mentioned in the Bible like Babylon.

[MCH1984]

If America wanted a war badly, attacking it's own trade centre would definitely not have been the most sane option. Economically it's like shooting yourself in the foot.

If they wanted to spur Americans into violence and want a war, surely the Statue of Liberty would have been a much better target.

[alastairblakepeters]

I think the cost of lives helps heighten the concern. Attacking anything that makes a nation's people feel threatened can be an effective way of rallying support. Feeling targeted as a nation is a good way to create patriotism, nationalism, anxiety and a desire to defend/fight back.

[MCH1984]

Precisely; although it doesn't prove that 9/11 was an inside job. Frankly with the state of the US economy I wouldn't peg Bush as being capable of stealing candy from a baby, much less plot terrorism.

[alastairblakepeters]

alright. I just wanted to argue that WTC bombings could be seen as an effective way of rallying a nation. I am not saying "hey they did it" but done or not, I do believe it gave results that were desirable for anything wanting patriotism and so on.

[MCH1984]

That is true. I do think that if it was masterminded by the US that Bush can't have been involved, though. That backwards dirtfarmer couldn't tie his shoes without help ;)

[alastairblakepeters]

haha! he sure seems to be clueless.

[larsdeheer]

Inside job thats al i can say .

[salemcripple]

LOL! This doesn't proove shit! Are any of you people bomb experts, are any of the film makers for that matter? NO! Have any of you ever heard a 50 ton girder falling to the ground. Well i have, and even from just a few feet off the ground it souds jus like that "BANG"! So from 30 storys up, it's gotta make one hell of a racket.

[legggomyego]

Youre a bomb expert? If you arent any more qualified than us to say whether there were bombs involved how can you say there werent?

If youre going to credit the media and our govt, I'd suggest you look into the USS Maine, Gulf of Tonkin etc

Did you know our government got the People of the United States to go to war over PIRATES? Pirates.. weapons of mass destruction..

There were no pirates, there werent wmds. They never had proof and that's because they WERENT THERE.

Think about it.

[salemcripple]

Because i do know what a bomb sounds like, and i know what a building falling apart sounds like. And to those that don't know what the fuck their talking about they would sound similar. There are literally THOUSANDS of things in a building that is falling apart that can make a bang, and just because it does make a big bang, does not make it an "explosion". Further more, any explosions used to bring down the WTC would have been VERY evident, not just these little "puffs" they show here.

[salemcripple]

AND I know for a fact that in order for a building to be demoed from explosives, the entire inside of the building needs to be gutted. That's floors, walls, and ceilings. Nothing left to hamper the demo process. It will not fall properly otherwise.

[legggomyego]

Well I can't really arg those pops weren't bombs because I think most of them weren't. But I think some type of explosive had to be used at one point or another to bring these buildings down. Recently, China's tallest building caught on fire for somewhere around 9 hours and didn't fall. In 1945, the Empire State Building (102 stories) was hit by a B-25 . The world trade centers were 110 stories.

This another video I thought was really interesting. watch?v=epIv0IxpuCE

[salemcripple]

Well the Empire state's construction is the complete opposite from that of the WTC. Plus it was hit with a much smaller plane. Seriously a b25 liberator is like 1/10 the size of the the 777. And it wasn't just the fire, it was a combined effect. The impact took out most the structural columns, While the fire continued to weaken it, until it fell. Had it been just the fire, or just the impact, they would have more than likely stayed standing.

[legggomyego]

So then how did jet fuel continue to burn for that long?

Because as far as I know concrete and metal doesn't really set fire.

[salemcripple]

Ever poor gasoline on a fire? It burns for a surprising amount of time. And no, concrete and metal doesn't burn, but plastic, wood, fabric, drywall, insulation, ect does! It's like a car fire, it's not the car itself that's burning, but what's inside the car. And things like plastic have a VERY high flash point. That is once they get burning, they burn very hot, for a long time. Ever throw something plastic in a camp fire?

[legggomyego]

Well gasoline is different in chemical makeup compared to aircraft fuel. I couldn't tell you what those differences would be though.

And I don't think I could believe that a plane crashed into it, the fuel got everywhere in ONE part of the building, spread through the drywall and computer desks, and then caused the building to fall.

[legggomyego]

I mean you can pour gasoline on a campfire and it'll burn black smoke for about 10 seconds or so.. I just did it the other day in my backyard the other day actually lol

The wood burns for a long time but the gas burns up because it's so combustible. Jet fuel would do the same.

[AlNouveau]

Guess again. Aluminum aircraft don't "take out" steel columns. There were explosions visible on floors below the collapse. There were no chunk's of concrete debris ejected from the collapse. Everything was pulverized as it would by in a controlled demolition situation. Debris was ejected up and out as it like from a CD. And lastly, how do you explain WTC 7 dropping when I was hit by nothing. Lots of buildings caught debris from the collapse. Just look at the pictures of the event. Wake up.

[salemcripple]

I'm done trying to explain simple physics to you morons.

[AlNouveau]

Hate to tell you, in the real world, steel framed buildings don't collapse from fire, only from controlled demolatition. It may be too difficult for some to face this reality but that don't mean it didn't happen. WTC7 was not struck by an aircraft but collapsed, pulverized, into it's own footprint. Just look at the films, textbook CD. You don't want to believe it fine, lots of flat earthers out there. You've still got lot's of company but you lose a fewer every day. The truth has that effect.

[salemcripple]

Hate to tell you, but you're barking up the wrong tree. If you understood even the most basic high school level physics, and building design, you would understand that the amount of stresses a building would endure during a large plane collision could in fact take it down. But like i said, i'm done trying to explain this shit you morons. First of all you have to have an IQ of above 70, so....

[AlNouveau]

You keep talking about basic physics but don't actually say or prove anything except you like calling people names. You don't even try to address WTC7 collapse which wasn't hit by an aircraft. Let me clue you in. It's ok to disagree with people but when all you do is call them names it's just makes you look at best, immature. The cnly steel framed building ever to collapse in this manner that were not CD were WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7. If you think that's not suspect I guess we're finished.

[salemcripple]

Like i said, "I'm none trying to explain". No matter how hard i try, no matter how many times i try, you people keep throwing the same shit back at me. And i call you morons because only a moron who has no idea what they are talking about, would believe some of this shit. So good by.

[AlNouveau]

Maybe it would help for you to look at the all the events of 9/11, not just the WTC collapse. All of the inconsistancies, lack of aircraft wreckage, missing military response, all the things that should exist or should have happened but didn't. Then maybe you'll question and look at the evidence differently, or not. Either way Be well.

[MCH1984]

Just how much wreckage do you expect there to be left after a plane hits a strengthened building and explodes?

[AlNouveau]

All of it. Maybe steel vaporizes on your planet but that never happens here on earth. And you didn't address any of my comments. There was more to 9/11 than the planes hitting the towers. Look at the entire event and the lack of any investigation until all the scene evidence was removed from each site. No NTSB examination of black box recordings. NORAD scrambles jets all the time except they don't during four simultaneous hijackings on 9/11/2001. If this was a movie plot nobody would buy it.

[MCH1984]

Precisely; but the most amazing things happen in reality, not in Hollywood.

Steel 'never vapourises'? I never insinuated that it did; but only a moron would assume it to be indestructible.

[AlNouveau]

I understand it's hard to accept but in the real world building don't implode like WT1, WT2 and WT7, unless controllled demolishion (CD)is employeed. If it has happened, prove it. Post a link to the story. How about another instance where the NTSB does not investigate the crash of an aircraft. Go ahead, post an example. You won't cause you can't. You'll just talk shit and call people morons. It don't prove your point or make you look very bright but for you it's better than facing the truth.

[MCH1984]

Actually it's upto the 'truthers' to prove it WAS a controlled demolition; not the other way around.

So far the only 'evidence' you have is either circumstantial, speculative or just plain bullshit. You pretend to understand physics and construction, yet in reality go only by the sheer crap posted on conspiracist websites.

Show me evidence, or shut up. One or the other.

[MCH1984]

A lack of investigation? Ever thought you might just be looking in the wrong places?

[MCH1984]

Steel behaves differently during abnormal conditions; in extreme heat it loses most of it's strength, warps twists and can even break. In high-speed impacts it can behave almost like a liquid, shifting in all manner of directions purely because of the huge forces imposed on it.

Steel is not as strong as people think it is; those who compare the impact of a plane to that of a 'strong wind' are obviously clinically insane.

[rsolgtp]

that is not done to stop the demo process being "hampered" You remove as much of the buildings windows/doors/light fitting. the walls/floors/ceilings are what you want to demo.. if you removed them there wouldn't be a building. at most they weaken load bearing walls but only if its safe and if it will equalize the fall.

[Jakobez]

Actually we sold them WMD's in like the 90's or so

[legggomyego]

What WMD's? I thought we were talking about 9/11, not the reasons for the 'conflict' in Iraq. It's definitely a war but for some reason they're calling it the 'Conflict in Iraq' and 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' (did the same thing with the Korean War and Vietnam).

But yea, I have no clue what you're talking about lol

[Jakobez]

I think I meant to comment on someone else, I have no idea how that happened, haha

[legggomyego]

Hah ok. Np

[rsolgtp]

just the yellowcake. they just brought it back the other day:) they never even refined it.

[Houston4444]

Lol you've used the music of Command and Conquer Generals

[threehotdogs3]

shut up

its pessimists like you that are ruining our country :p

[BloodTar]

Americans don't care about this. We want to believe cave dwellers accomplished this and that Bush has it all under control. We want to hear about Britney, Hilton, Lohan and the rest of the important news stories. And wer'e waiting for the superbowl to see if our team wins and we hope we get the new hip gift for christmas because that's what's really important.....Right?

[elppen]

SO im a dildo :( aww right after i say this i read your comment.

[vudumojo]

You watch, some dildo will say that was a floor falling....

Prett obvious it was as they all call it who were there, "an explosion"!