Hey may sound like a quack to some but he honestly has a valid point... look at quantum mechanics and some "new age" philosophy. It makes a difference.
hahaha, you have a very original point of view on things Mister! So you are taking a few elements from m-theory, some things out of quantum mechanics, some things out of spirituality, haha.
I always thought this was a quite interesting point of view.
what did you study and have you seen 'What the bleep do we know '( a film)
This same person was giving a lesson on super-power memory just minutes ago in person. He taught me how to cube and how to cube-root huge numbers. I don't think he is dumb. Well i havent seen this video yet . This comment was posted before i watched this video.
How is it that war, in the year 2011, is not illegal? How is it not illegal to run around murdering people? Murdering people is illegal, you will get locked up for it.
What these people are missing is a moral code.
That is the part where God gets involved and says, "I am the gate keeper to hell, my friend Satan agrees with me on a couple of points.
Read a damn bible. Jesus never rejected Satan. Satan got rejected by everyone else..
Satan and Jesus are in this together. I'm in on this to.
Everything is made out of an assembly of component parts. All of the component parts that make everything are made out of component parts.
There is no base building block of the universe. Logically there can't be. Every time science declares they have found the base building block, it will turn out that building block is made from an assembly of component parts.
This fact will stand true no matter how far down the rabbit hole we get,
Man will never fully understand the infinite possibilities of the universe, it will always only be a theory, which once reached will present another set of infinite possibilities, but this is a step in the correct direction, this man is trying to find the source, the supreme intelligence,this is not about religion,but a quest for the truth and that is, there can be only pure love.
Love you Bro! That was awesome! I'm a engineering major who was looking for some bomb vids to watch. First thing that God lead me to was this. I was in awe totally unexpected and totally appreciated. God bless you Sir. All Glory to God!
I accept that the Universe has infinite possibilities, and we as individuals can decide what we want to do. For instance when you paint a picture you have the ability to express yourself and show what you see. If someone tells you that you don't see something when in fact you do or you are not allowed to see it and you yield to them, then you are at a loss. Further more you will only find truth on your own and not with some dude telling you what he thinks or some lady- whatever.
The most amazing assumption made by "physicists" is that there is a smallest particle. Sure your imagination would insist that, when the pattern goes on until infinity you assume an end? really dumb
How quintessentially religious. A theologian (and I use that term loosely) gets information from one source and assumes he understands all of its implications, even going so far as to portray his speculative and unproven theories as facts. You don't understand quantum mechanics and you certainly don't understand string theory. Your using string theory as a metaphor for your religious beliefs when your understanding of topic in the first place is flawed and incorrect.
@quakemath I agree. He made a lot of assumptions, first being there is "a string theory". There are many and they vary. He never explained the assumptions, b/c he's not scientific and they weren't his thoughts/knowledge. Then he came to an erroneous conclusion about god, which he was trying to be clever to prove. He did seem to be trying. I absolutely believe that Science and God are different views of the same truth, but this is a mockery at worse, and a mistake at best. Cheers
Almost with ya then you got to intellectual beings, What is an intellectual being give me one example that makes us intellectual beings and I show an animal in nature that does the same thing. Why the he'll do we think we are so special.
i really enjoy that however there is no such thing as freewill apart from frequancy, the frequancy is freewill. "i have made man in the image of myself"
You are an uneducated bullshit artist i know physics and quantum dynamics and you are misleading and misinforming people with this video preying on those with out the ability to obtain a higher level of understanding to promote your own agenda you are wrong for that and people who have a higher level of understanding will see this but you dont prey on those you prey on those of weaker knowledge and understanding you are a dick for that
Hi @wbPROTIME , you started with the premise that a loop need a force to be created form a string, but nothing prove that assumption for all cases possible; especially at the range of tiny dimensions. Because apparent lows for microcosm are not always similar to microcosm. That's why it has been so hard and long to find a "theory of everything" that unify Quantum & Relativity. Which remains a theory, which has only the value of its capability to explain and predict more about physical universe.
This made no sense, even if you explain it as "he pulled it from his ass" I would say no sir, I don't believe one could reach far enough up their own ass to pull THIS out.
I liked this video. He put his point across. It makes one think. We are still allowed to think? We have free will, but! The law's that our ancestors wrote down should guide us in our everyday living. Upshot is we have wasted too much , so lot's of people will die because there is too many to help or feed. People always die, but not so many at one time. This will be heard , like the biggest moan. LOVE.
Hhahaha I call bullshit on this. Cycles of food, war and population but not free will? Sorry buddy but they all come as a result of free will which aparently isn't a cycle according to you so therefore they cannot be part of a cycle
That was a huge jump to conclusion, you did not explain why it takes a God to set boundaries on the universe and certainly did not in any way prove why that God would have anything to do with Christianity or any other religion on earth.
Why even bother trying to make it look like science if you dont have facts? Its just dishonest.
"String hypothesis" not "string theory." A genuine theory can be falsified or disproven. The string hypothesis cannot yet be tested and therefore falsified, so it's still a hypothesis.
what you have here is a speculative hypothesis, not a theory. it has to go under peer review before it becomes a theory. I'm afraid if you sent this to Nature, Science or Physics today, It wouldn't get anywhere. Real physicists actually get annoyed at kooky "theories". I'm studying physics, it isn't as simple as that. if you think you understand it, you need to go away and read the books again.
The power of the vibrations of the intelligent word of our Maker resound throughout all of His Creation.
Only our Maker Himself is able to revitalize our lives by His eternal Spirit speaking truth to us making it possible to translate us into His eternal kingdom.
@wbPROTIME, First of all, how in the fuck do you fit shapes and matter into the Planks Constant according to the modern M-theory? This is a theory to waste good graph paper, markers and our god damn time. It's just an incompetent way of trying to prove your god by means of scribbles without mathematical evidence, any reference thesis or anything what so ever. So all you could have summed it up in 15 words, "I don't know shit about Theoretical Physics and am trying to sell religion to you. "
The real string theory consist of tiny 1-dimensional strands of energy called the string. This string has a size of about the Planck length. The vibration mode of this string is quantize and will not take form of a human just like u said.
@valeo626 JIM JONES wore a shirt and tie you trust what any fucktard says just cause hes older and wears a tie get yourself educated and know the truth dont trust an ass hole just cause he wears a fucking tie and is older than you are, damn thats just stupid
One can focus on the string as matter/energy of the world of "creation" and subject it to scientific scrutiny to learn more about the universe, and this is good.
Then, on the flip side, one can ponder the source of the string (matter/energy) and whether called the Big Bang or God, it becomes the same thing.
As to the proposition that man created God, one must then ask who created the man who created God, giving him the idea of Himself?
Many men do create many ideas or notions of God, of course.
I liked the diagramatic explanation. Could you please explain Oneness of spiritulity/eternal reality and parallel universe with string theory if possible? How the string vibrate within and beyond the existance which propagate energy through the mesh (2D) or volume/ocean 3D) of space-time. Can I have some reference on this.
How can a string be infinitely long? How can an area fluctuate between being infinitely large and infinitely small, especially if the string is infinitely long? How can a force vary from infinitely weak to infinitely strong? Where is the evidence for this? How does this explain anything? And the pseudoscience award goes to...!
@ReligionlessFAITH The strings are vibrating entities of energy. In other words, they're composed of pure energy. Also this maybe the "boson" that many conventional physicists are trying to find that makes up matter in its smallest discrete form. In other words, the Higgs boson might actually be the strings and membranes which are the constituents of the universe in its smallest and largest bits.
@FallofDarkness55 exactly ... energy can not be created or destrotyed.. sooo ...strings can't just pop out of nowhere... something has to cause them to exist ... when you figure out where they come from, lemme know, lol
@ReligionlessFAITH Apparently you are illiterate and can't put two and two together! The strings are composed of pure energy that vibrates within the heart of matter!
@ReligionlessFAITH Apparently, you don't know how to debate properly without making insults. The strings are composed of energy! Enough said. Are you purposefully trying to be ignorant? Energy cannot be created or destroyed and since the strings are composed of pure energy, the strings are eternal entities. The strings, in other words, always existed. God, on the other hand, is an absurd notion invented by humans as comfort. Religion is a fairy tale and makes people feel better about death
@FallofDarkness55 you're the one that's ignorant, because there is nothing in existence that spawns from nowhere, so if strings cause you to exist, something causes strings to exist and you evade the question by insulting my intelligence but in reality your own intelligence is questionable if you wish to suggest that strings just pop into existence spontaneously Religions should be illegal ... it has nothing to do with the question of how strings come to exist.
@ReligionlessFAITH God damn, do your research on Quantum Mechanics and get back to me! You could say the same thing about the random mutation in biological evolution. Why aren't you asking me where the odd ball creature came from within a species before undergoing the natural selection process?
@FallofDarkness55 quantum mechanics does not delve into matters eternal, because no one can be sure what physical laws work where there is no time or infinite time. Once you transcend our reality which is a time-based reality, all theories are speculation due to lack of observable data.
@ReligionlessFAITH At the singularity of the big bang, the quantum mechanical properties erupted into existence via the quantum mechanical energy within hyperspace which can form parallel universes. In fact, we can observe these properties by observing the diffraction of light and electrons. If electrons has these properties, then surely all matter and anti-matter particles will have this effect. Taking the singularity of the big bang into account you inevitably get parallel universes.
@ReligionlessFAITH If you knew anything about quantum mechanics, you would not be asking me that absurd question! If you don't believe in god, then why the hell are you trying to be a menace? Do some research and maybe you'll understand how something can always exist!
@FallofDarkness55 God is a creation of human minds... however... we can prove there is an intelligent indefinable Creator of our universe. No matter how far science goes with the experimental scientific method, the carnal human mind is finite, limited in existence, intellect, knowledge, and vocabulary due to our temporal condition. Defining the Creator of our universe requires an eternal existence, mind, vocabulary. I will message you a link. so this does not get flagged as spam
@FallofDarkness55 its not an absurd question.. it's what science is all about. Creating a universe is simple: first, it needs a container, so you use dark energy to create an empty expandable space-time continuum. then you inject it with a jolt of electromagnetic plazma and stand back :P
@ReligionlessFAITH LOL. To me it seems like you're an agnostic the way you speak about "an intelligent indefinable Creator of our universe." I don't believe any form of intelligence was involved in the "creation" of our universe. I believe mass and energy are two interchangeable inherent properties of our physical universe. Period! Also take a look at fractals! They are an infinite sequence of complex patterns. I believe our universe operates under the same principles of fractals.
@FallofDarkness55 their is nothing proven to exist, which does not have it's creator... you create ideas when you think, sound when you speak etc... you were created by your parents. add up all the creator/creation associations just among humans and you approach infinite numbers. this relationship exists among all things...the creator/creation relationship is the trademark left on everything by the creator of this universe, and it can be traced back beyond the origin of this universe.
@FallofDarkness55 all human logic systems are built on axioms. the axiom of infinity, numbers, zero, time, etc...it can be demonstrated that all things are created...EVEN axioms are created to our knowledge base by their creators, the human mind. There is one axiom that has been overlooked. The axiom of creation: anything that acts on itself, something else, or its environment is a creator. Anything changed by itself, something else, or its environment is a creation. it's the PRIME AXIOM
@ReligionlessFAITH The deep laws of the cosmos are not trivial and nor can they be comprehensible to the human mind. You need to start thinking outside the domain of human logic i.e. fractal nature of reality as I already proposed!
@FallofDarkness55 chaos theory is a prime example of how human intellect can't perceive eternal intelligence. Chaos is an observation, they call it chaos because we observe interactions and expect probable results but our ablilty to perceive, calculate or intuit all things is not possible, we are finite intellect. Eternal intellect is perfect beyond our understanding of perfection, because it operates where time = 0 and time = +-infinity simultaneously. We can't compete with that.
@FallofDarkness55 heh I didn't know there was a field of study using the illogical unless you mean religion...heh, I know all about how religions have fractured truth. Fractals are not illogical, similar patterns repeated to varying scales kindof reflects my personal intuition that exsistence is a sequence of concentric spheres of reality.
@jfleminator can energy/matter be created or destroyed in this temporal space/time reality? no. could this space time reality have been created, from another reality, then injected with energy from that alternate reality .. yes... can we perceive into a trans-temporal reality? no. can we deduce this temporal reality to have been created from a pre-space-time reality? yes
@jfleminator you think.. you create ideas, you walk you create locomotion, you fart, you create stink...everything you do is a creation of some sort...you were created by the mingling of the genes of your parents. you are a creator and a creation. the creator./creation associations in this reality can be counted. Everything that exists as known to us is either a creator, a creation or both.. count them all up. overwhelming self-evidence of creator/creation associations leads to the prime axiom
@ReligionlessFAITH you think, ideas occur, you walk locomotion occurs, you fart, stink occurs... everything you do is an occurrance of some sort...you occurred through the mingling of the genes of your parents. you are an entity that is part of nature. the fact that 1+1 "creates" 2 means that there are infinitely many creator/creation associations in "this reality" and thus they cannot be counted. Has this never occurred to you? Words are meaningless in nature.
@lnYourJeans read your dictionary dude a creation is when something is caused to exist where it did not exist... an idea or thought is caused to exist where it did not previously exists, therefore its a creation. your foolish to try to detract from the truth of creations and creators in nature. nothing begets nothing, and every occurance has its creator. all things that exist are created to exist or they could not exist. read your dictionary :/
@ReligionlessFAITH The laws of physics do not make reference to any lexicon. Give up on your quest for understanding along the path you have chosen - it will only be riddled with confusion. What I did in my earlier post was show that by using different words we can change the meaning of nature but still have it make sense. This is not how science works. Again, words are meaningless in nature.
@lnYourJeans a creator/creation association can be demonstrated for EVERYTHING that exists in our universe, and this self-evidence proves an axiom of creation. Without the axiom of creation, no other knowledge would be known, lexicon or not. because the knowledge or logic could not spawn out of nothing, it MUST first be created as an idea or thought. Words are required to describe nature, without them we'd have to resort to flinging poo. Your misuse of words cannot affect truth.
@lnYourJeans To use a word which does not fully describe an event is not nature's fault. Words are very important when trying to understand nature, and just because words which can make sense - but imply a different meaning - can be used, does not change the truth which appropriate words imply. Reality is a constant. Perceptions change, and words are created to more closely describe nature based on observations uncovered by our ever-evolving ability to more accurately perceive truth.
@ReligionlessFAITH I've just re-read some of your earlier discussions with Fall. You state that beyond our reality, "all theories are speculation due to lack of OBSERVABLE DATA". Yet you then say that the Universe was "created" using dark energy and injecting it with an electromagnetic plazma. If I am not mistaken, there is no "OBSERVABLE DATA" that tells us that your idea is factually correct. By your own definition you must therefore be speculating. I trust you were already aware of this.
@lnYourJeans I never said a creator of this universe was observable, nor did I indicate proff of the existence of Dark energy. I said that an axiom of creation is self-evident and applies to everything that exists in our reality. Since our universe, and space-time exist as observable things in our reality, the axiom of creation can be used to accept - not prove - the existence of a creator of spacetime and of this universe, like we accept the concept of infinity as a truth.
@ReligionlessFAITH Re: your last post. When we try to describe events in nature, relaying those details to other people is usually done using language. Maths/physics uses precise language which rarely includes the idea of a creator of the Universe. Yes, common sense implies that things have creators, but the world of the very small defies common sense. You would be wise to learn more and preach less. If you think you understand nature, you don't understand nature. You're just trying to be clever
@lnYourJeans Most scientists do not know about the axiom of creation and its importance. No scientific or mathematical knowledge would be known if not by application of the axiom of creation: it's obvious self-evidence is easily ignored. There are in fact fields of science that attempt to link our temporal reality to a trans-temporal reality.. the discipline of metaphysical science is gaining more acceptance day by day. I don't go there because i dont believe we can transcend time yet.
@lnYourJeans I don't preach anything. I use the traditional science knowledge I learned in university to produce nourishment in the form of fruit for millions of people. You may have eaten some of the fruit I produce using traditionally accepted scientific knowledge. I have created some specialized scientific knowledge specific to the various soil-types, elevations, and other environmentally unique conditions in my own orchards. Taming nature is my business. Rationality, my passion.
@lnYourJeans The world of the very small seems to indicate that every truth we can establish prompts many new questions for which no answers exist yet. I don't pretend to understand string theory. but then, I'm not even sure this theory has been associated to a specific hypothesis which has been proven to answer a question by experiment. I do know that we posess limited intellect by virtue of our temporal nature. It is only by axiomatic logic that we can accept concepts we're unable to prove.
@ReligionlessFAITH Do some reading on the latest results relating to quark-gluon plasmas then get back to me on whether you still think string theory has not been associated with any experimental proof. Also, stop going on about your "axiomatic logic" crap - there are some things which can never be proven using our normal system of logic. If you had any formal mathematical education you should be aware of this. Take for example the Riemann Hypothesis. When you can prove that is true, let me know
@lnYourJeans I've read alot about strings... very little is said about their origin other than the postulation of their eistence... I don't doubt they may exist,
i just ask if anyone knows how they come to be. I'll keep the axiomatic logic thanks... strings might be an axiom for all you know.
Your think axiomatic logic is crap, so you think numbers, infinity, zero, time, etc are crap .. so you have no clue about reality. Unproven axioms is what math and science is built on fool.
@FallofDarkness55 I'm far beyond agnostic. Religions are carnal inventions. Prophets are fotunetellers. God is abused by ANYONE who would impart eternal meaning to carnal words placed in God's mouth. The act of defining God with finite meaning puts "God" in a bottle, but we are in the Creator's bottle. I build faith in an infinitely more perfect than perfect Creator. not faith in carnal words written in carnal vocabularies. Theres a big difference between faith in God and faith in religion
@FallofDarkness55 In 1975, I used hubble's law and observations of several quasars to show that the universe was expanding at an accelerated rate. It was a paper I did for my astronomy course at Brock University. My professor gave me a 99% grade on the paper but in big bold letters he wrote "your observations and calculations are well documented and the presentation of your theory is well done. I am deducting one mark because you're wrong"! heh... I wasn't wrong, still have the paper :P
@FallofDarkness55 strings are eternal ... rofl .. eternal means all things past and all things future existing simultaneously in an infintessimally small increment of time such that time = 0. you may be able to tell yourself that you can observe matters eternal, and when you can create a universe like ours, I might believe you, in the meantime stick with temporal perception and explain how strings come to exist.
a holagraph is an image produced by spliting a lazer beam and having it hit it self that energy forms rippples in the plastic sheet which you look through in regular light and a 3-D image appears so we can create our own strings of energy by bending back on itself any form of energy. even our own cirulatory system is a form of rotating energy (get it circulatory "circular") or a huracane energy. For your super computer just e-mail me at wbprotime@gmail.com
@OldSchoolSkill I agree. He's not a physicist at all. He even states that the string vibrates in three dimensions, yet makes no reference to multidimensional aspects. A really misleading video, based on speculation, that can only fuel the deluded mind.
@OldSchoolSkill You are wrong in a way, because the holographic universe does exist and the energy of humans too. This is not a religious thing... but this video is a little bit confusing xD
Obviously here are not presented scientific studies...
He started to lose me when he drew the man. When he started talking about cycles, I was already looking for the my mouse. When he said, "Free Will". I had to respond.
WHY?! Why the are there waves, why is there infinite, why are there strings and forces? Any other video I look at answers these questions to a great degree, but you just say yeah here's all this shit and here's what it does, trust me, I'm dressed like a doctor.
Screw you dude, please break your camera before you can poison someone else into truly believing whatever it is that you're trying to actually say.
this guy is mentally retarded... the string has infinite length? its supposed to be microscopically small... all straight lines are curves depending on our perspective? what the fuck>? string theory has nothing to do with strings vibrating and forming all the shapes like a human body and triangles and squares.... string theorists believe that microscopically small strings vibrate at different frequencies to form sub atomic particles...
Typically human, a restcricted ability to understand the meaning of life, creating more confusion than sense . Tangenting speculation and opinion going in the wrong direction.
Hey may sound like a quack to some but he honestly has a valid point... look at quantum mechanics and some "new age" philosophy. It makes a difference.
AaL3XaNd3R09 17 hours ago
set limits on the infinite what ? haha. well i do think there was some good points tho about love and hate !
ovechkin100 2 days ago
I like his wall of A4 Sheets.
JavaLuCpp 5 days ago
What a load of nonsense!
jssherrard 6 days ago
obvious troll is obvious
infinitively small *facepalm* that would be either 1/infinity or just say 0
herby i have prooven a poor attempt at trolling
spinnenente 1 week ago
This guy is a fucking idiot.
ElektroniqHD 1 week ago
whole W-H-O-L........
tessapoop 2 weeks ago
Thanks you got me interested. I am computer science student, but i am very much interested in physics, where can I find more material on this subject
evnix0 3 weeks ago
hahaha, you have a very original point of view on things Mister! So you are taking a few elements from m-theory, some things out of quantum mechanics, some things out of spirituality, haha.
I always thought this was a quite interesting point of view.
what did you study and have you seen 'What the bleep do we know '( a film)
UkyYanni 3 weeks ago
This same person was giving a lesson on super-power memory just minutes ago in person. He taught me how to cube and how to cube-root huge numbers. I don't think he is dumb. Well i havent seen this video yet . This comment was posted before i watched this video.
54762109758 3 weeks ago
this guy is no different from the guy that sees everything as genitals. you either are or you aren't a physicist. you can't play as one.
androol 3 weeks ago
uhm...nope!
mokopa 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love the show but how do you explain this: ultimate-theory-of-everything dot c o m? Time has to exist or all our physics mean nothing.
royrporterjr 1 month ago
How is it that war, in the year 2011, is not illegal? How is it not illegal to run around murdering people? Murdering people is illegal, you will get locked up for it.
What these people are missing is a moral code.
That is the part where God gets involved and says, "I am the gate keeper to hell, my friend Satan agrees with me on a couple of points.
Read a damn bible. Jesus never rejected Satan. Satan got rejected by everyone else..
Satan and Jesus are in this together. I'm in on this to.
3nasacova 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is a universal fact:
Everything is made out of an assembly of component parts. All of the component parts that make everything are made out of component parts.
There is no base building block of the universe. Logically there can't be. Every time science declares they have found the base building block, it will turn out that building block is made from an assembly of component parts.
This fact will stand true no matter how far down the rabbit hole we get,
I guarantee it.
3nasacova 1 month ago
Comment removed
3nasacova 1 month ago
infinitely small, how big is that?
hotkonto 1 month ago
@hotkonto The answer to that question is purely reliant on your imagination.
3nasacova 1 month ago
You were doing fine up untill the "frequencies forming a human body" stuff. come on, seriously.
MuonRay 1 month ago
at first i was like cool, but then once he mixed war and free will and religion into the string theory i was like wtf?
AdamZXA 1 month ago 3
This is poetry at best. Not reality.
Adaerus 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS GUY IS AN IDIOT!
davmus12 2 months ago
Only a true genius could so eloquently bond physical science and religion. It moves me.
KatraVait 2 months ago
Man will never fully understand the infinite possibilities of the universe, it will always only be a theory, which once reached will present another set of infinite possibilities, but this is a step in the correct direction, this man is trying to find the source, the supreme intelligence,this is not about religion,but a quest for the truth and that is, there can be only pure love.
Prince.
princevalantino41162 3 months ago
infinity is not a "spot". It's not even a number.
yoududeuser 3 months ago
what fucking rubbish, he starts off talking about science and moves into god and shit
thedazdaryl 3 months ago
Love you Bro! That was awesome! I'm a engineering major who was looking for some bomb vids to watch. First thing that God lead me to was this. I was in awe totally unexpected and totally appreciated. God bless you Sir. All Glory to God!
80arnell 3 months ago
This human seems more an alien...
bacontido 3 months ago
Hi Walter.
MisterDustinFace 3 months ago
I agree, The schrodinger cat paradox explains it all.
knollhouse 3 months ago
This whole video was complete nonsense.
seanmas 3 months ago
QUICK! Someone get the straightjacket!!
LeconsdAnalyse 3 months ago
I accept that the Universe has infinite possibilities, and we as individuals can decide what we want to do. For instance when you paint a picture you have the ability to express yourself and show what you see. If someone tells you that you don't see something when in fact you do or you are not allowed to see it and you yield to them, then you are at a loss. Further more you will only find truth on your own and not with some dude telling you what he thinks or some lady- whatever.
sketchmavrick 3 months ago
The most amazing assumption made by "physicists" is that there is a smallest particle. Sure your imagination would insist that, when the pattern goes on until infinity you assume an end? really dumb
chrispaquette 3 months ago
What the fuck is this. What a waste of time.
Indrius 4 months ago
How quintessentially religious. A theologian (and I use that term loosely) gets information from one source and assumes he understands all of its implications, even going so far as to portray his speculative and unproven theories as facts. You don't understand quantum mechanics and you certainly don't understand string theory. Your using string theory as a metaphor for your religious beliefs when your understanding of topic in the first place is flawed and incorrect.
quakemath 4 months ago
@quakemath I agree. He made a lot of assumptions, first being there is "a string theory". There are many and they vary. He never explained the assumptions, b/c he's not scientific and they weren't his thoughts/knowledge. Then he came to an erroneous conclusion about god, which he was trying to be clever to prove. He did seem to be trying. I absolutely believe that Science and God are different views of the same truth, but this is a mockery at worse, and a mistake at best. Cheers
celestian1111 1 month ago
Almost with ya then you got to intellectual beings, What is an intellectual being give me one example that makes us intellectual beings and I show an animal in nature that does the same thing. Why the he'll do we think we are so special.
13sam31 4 months ago
i really enjoy that however there is no such thing as freewill apart from frequancy, the frequancy is freewill. "i have made man in the image of myself"
Dirt7055 4 months ago
You are an uneducated bullshit artist i know physics and quantum dynamics and you are misleading and misinforming people with this video preying on those with out the ability to obtain a higher level of understanding to promote your own agenda you are wrong for that and people who have a higher level of understanding will see this but you dont prey on those you prey on those of weaker knowledge and understanding you are a dick for that
DJM4EVER1 4 months ago
Otherwise it would have never formed a loop
wbPROTIME 4 months ago
Hi @wbPROTIME , you started with the premise that a loop need a force to be created form a string, but nothing prove that assumption for all cases possible; especially at the range of tiny dimensions. Because apparent lows for microcosm are not always similar to microcosm. That's why it has been so hard and long to find a "theory of everything" that unify Quantum & Relativity. Which remains a theory, which has only the value of its capability to explain and predict more about physical universe.
Khwartz 3 months ago
@wbPROTIME if the string would have infinite length . wouldnt that be foolish ? ... i mean infinite is fools number right ?
IvanderHaisley 3 months ago
It takes an external force to loop something back on it's self. So to have the first string something had to force it back on itself.
wbPROTIME 4 months ago
a string of what? force or matter
blackkat888 5 months ago
No Dude. That is not the light. It makes no sense at all. Try again.
Thx anyway. Open your mind.
luminositymusic 5 months ago
This made no sense, even if you explain it as "he pulled it from his ass" I would say no sir, I don't believe one could reach far enough up their own ass to pull THIS out.
LucianUramu 6 months ago
Does this theory have any mathematical basis? Idiot.
jrizomd 6 months ago
What.
A.
Fucking.
Waste.
Of.
Time.
What does 'god' or the person have to do with it?
uriituw 6 months ago
I liked this video. He put his point across. It makes one think. We are still allowed to think? We have free will, but! The law's that our ancestors wrote down should guide us in our everyday living. Upshot is we have wasted too much , so lot's of people will die because there is too many to help or feed. People always die, but not so many at one time. This will be heard , like the biggest moan. LOVE.
eddie100 6 months ago
its more philosophy then a theory
addo1001 6 months ago
Hhahaha I call bullshit on this. Cycles of food, war and population but not free will? Sorry buddy but they all come as a result of free will which aparently isn't a cycle according to you so therefore they cannot be part of a cycle
mattlamb34 6 months ago
WHAT A PIECE FOR GARBAGE! I want the 8 minutes of my life back!!! so badly wasted time
donnomar 6 months ago
Great Job!
thewhisperingeagle 6 months ago
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahhahahahaha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahhhahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh stupidity !
That would be Einstein's conclusion.
vrcraft 7 months ago
That was a huge jump to conclusion, you did not explain why it takes a God to set boundaries on the universe and certainly did not in any way prove why that God would have anything to do with Christianity or any other religion on earth.
Why even bother trying to make it look like science if you dont have facts? Its just dishonest.
puppetaccountable 7 months ago
I got 2 minutes into this before I realized that the bison's would never come. Why is this tagged as BISON!
09bluesfan 7 months ago
I THOUGHT THIS WAS A VIDEO OF BISON DAMN IT
09bluesfan 7 months ago
"String hypothesis" not "string theory." A genuine theory can be falsified or disproven. The string hypothesis cannot yet be tested and therefore falsified, so it's still a hypothesis.
csdr0 7 months ago
@csdr0 it CAN be falsified, the limits of our technology make it hard to do, but it still CAN be, if we could measure on small enough length scales
thefutureispeace 4 months ago
what you have here is a speculative hypothesis, not a theory. it has to go under peer review before it becomes a theory. I'm afraid if you sent this to Nature, Science or Physics today, It wouldn't get anywhere. Real physicists actually get annoyed at kooky "theories". I'm studying physics, it isn't as simple as that. if you think you understand it, you need to go away and read the books again.
teslacopernicus 7 months ago
@teslacopernicus besides, "bisons" means "buffalos" in French, though I guess he mispelled 'bosons', or did he...? :)
ScalinoCorleone 7 months ago
Uhmm...why is this tagged with "Bisons" ??? Where are the bisons? LOL
Stabacs 7 months ago
sining is vibration which transports meaning to the hearer.. very good!
wbPROTIME 7 months ago
The power of the vibrations of the intelligent word of our Maker resound throughout all of His Creation.
Only our Maker Himself is able to revitalize our lives by His eternal Spirit speaking truth to us making it possible to translate us into His eternal kingdom.
"All Creation sings your Magesty!"
JungleJargon 7 months ago
LOOK
LOOK INTO MY EYES
LOOK
EltBerserker 7 months ago
Noob of Sacred Geometry
Chottgun 7 months ago 9
Noob of Sacred Geometry
Chottgun 7 months ago
@wbPROTIME, First of all, how in the fuck do you fit shapes and matter into the Planks Constant according to the modern M-theory? This is a theory to waste good graph paper, markers and our god damn time. It's just an incompetent way of trying to prove your god by means of scribbles without mathematical evidence, any reference thesis or anything what so ever. So all you could have summed it up in 15 words, "I don't know shit about Theoretical Physics and am trying to sell religion to you. "
TKgeniusHELLTX 7 months ago
The real string theory consist of tiny 1-dimensional strands of energy called the string. This string has a size of about the Planck length. The vibration mode of this string is quantize and will not take form of a human just like u said.
cjcara036a 7 months ago
Alright I don't think this theory is true but you don't have to bash this guy and diss him. Have some respect all.
huanga2get 7 months ago
Amercians are so longwinded when they speak :/
ferdianeary92 7 months ago
he's wearing a white shirt and a tie, and he's older than me. i trust him!
valeo626 8 months ago 21
@valeo626 JIM JONES wore a shirt and tie you trust what any fucktard says just cause hes older and wears a tie get yourself educated and know the truth dont trust an ass hole just cause he wears a fucking tie and is older than you are, damn thats just stupid
DJM4EVER1 4 months ago
the theory is.......bullshit
theguywholaughed 8 months ago
this is called mad theory
anulundchut 8 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Unbelievable... Can't stop laughing!
PelisTheBow 8 months ago
This guy...escaped from the mental hospital
keonlo123 8 months ago
nice.. someone has been thinking,I enjoy this actually
exxalte 8 months ago
...therefore, God likes pizza.
jfleminator 8 months ago
That's what happens when you smoke a really good pot and watch "The Theory of Everything".
Taciturno23 9 months ago
energy drink red bull
1killerbilly 9 months ago
you lost me before you started talking, i dont get it
aquaphoenixfilmz 9 months ago
Sorry. I did not enjoy this sermon.
MishalQUT 9 months ago
One can focus on the string as matter/energy of the world of "creation" and subject it to scientific scrutiny to learn more about the universe, and this is good.
Then, on the flip side, one can ponder the source of the string (matter/energy) and whether called the Big Bang or God, it becomes the same thing.
As to the proposition that man created God, one must then ask who created the man who created God, giving him the idea of Himself?
Many men do create many ideas or notions of God, of course.
fsmtdaler 9 months ago
I liked the diagramatic explanation. Could you please explain Oneness of spiritulity/eternal reality and parallel universe with string theory if possible? How the string vibrate within and beyond the existance which propagate energy through the mesh (2D) or volume/ocean 3D) of space-time. Can I have some reference on this.
nandisumanta 9 months ago
i guess string theory does explain why theoretical physicists are so high-strung, and when their equations don't work, why they become strung-out?
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
It is all around you every time you complete an electrical circuit you form a string of energy.
wbPROTIME 9 months ago
The problem with string theory isvthat it is only mathematically based.
v9guitarhero1425 9 months ago
How can a string be infinitely long? How can an area fluctuate between being infinitely large and infinitely small, especially if the string is infinitely long? How can a force vary from infinitely weak to infinitely strong? Where is the evidence for this? How does this explain anything? And the pseudoscience award goes to...!
EclecticSceptic 9 months ago
All I see is a bunch of swirly lines and a rather confused man.
SmashThatRecord 9 months ago
YO DAWG I HERD U LIEK THEORIES SO WE PUT A THEORY IN YO THEORY SO U CAN THEORIZE WHILE U THEORIZE
garrettlolwut 9 months ago
where do strings come from?
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH The strings are vibrating entities of energy. In other words, they're composed of pure energy. Also this maybe the "boson" that many conventional physicists are trying to find that makes up matter in its smallest discrete form. In other words, the Higgs boson might actually be the strings and membranes which are the constituents of the universe in its smallest and largest bits.
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 thats what they said about atoms .. then protons neutrons electrons quarks etc it doesn't answer where they come from
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH Quit with your ignorance and look up the conservation of energy!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 exactly ... energy can not be created or destrotyed.. sooo ...strings can't just pop out of nowhere... something has to cause them to exist ... when you figure out where they come from, lemme know, lol
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH Apparently you are illiterate and can't put two and two together! The strings are composed of pure energy that vibrates within the heart of matter!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 apparently you are proof that monkeys mate with pigs, but i dont insult you... even though you can't answer where strings come from
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH Apparently, you don't know how to debate properly without making insults. The strings are composed of energy! Enough said. Are you purposefully trying to be ignorant? Energy cannot be created or destroyed and since the strings are composed of pure energy, the strings are eternal entities. The strings, in other words, always existed. God, on the other hand, is an absurd notion invented by humans as comfort. Religion is a fairy tale and makes people feel better about death
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 you're the one that's ignorant, because there is nothing in existence that spawns from nowhere, so if strings cause you to exist, something causes strings to exist and you evade the question by insulting my intelligence but in reality your own intelligence is questionable if you wish to suggest that strings just pop into existence spontaneously Religions should be illegal ... it has nothing to do with the question of how strings come to exist.
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH God damn, do your research on Quantum Mechanics and get back to me! You could say the same thing about the random mutation in biological evolution. Why aren't you asking me where the odd ball creature came from within a species before undergoing the natural selection process?
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 quantum mechanics does not delve into matters eternal, because no one can be sure what physical laws work where there is no time or infinite time. Once you transcend our reality which is a time-based reality, all theories are speculation due to lack of observable data.
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH At the singularity of the big bang, the quantum mechanical properties erupted into existence via the quantum mechanical energy within hyperspace which can form parallel universes. In fact, we can observe these properties by observing the diffraction of light and electrons. If electrons has these properties, then surely all matter and anti-matter particles will have this effect. Taking the singularity of the big bang into account you inevitably get parallel universes.
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 so where does the quantum mechanical energy in hyperspace come from?
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH If you knew anything about quantum mechanics, you would not be asking me that absurd question! If you don't believe in god, then why the hell are you trying to be a menace? Do some research and maybe you'll understand how something can always exist!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 God is a creation of human minds... however... we can prove there is an intelligent indefinable Creator of our universe. No matter how far science goes with the experimental scientific method, the carnal human mind is finite, limited in existence, intellect, knowledge, and vocabulary due to our temporal condition. Defining the Creator of our universe requires an eternal existence, mind, vocabulary. I will message you a link. so this does not get flagged as spam
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 its not an absurd question.. it's what science is all about. Creating a universe is simple: first, it needs a container, so you use dark energy to create an empty expandable space-time continuum. then you inject it with a jolt of electromagnetic plazma and stand back :P
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH LOL. To me it seems like you're an agnostic the way you speak about "an intelligent indefinable Creator of our universe." I don't believe any form of intelligence was involved in the "creation" of our universe. I believe mass and energy are two interchangeable inherent properties of our physical universe. Period! Also take a look at fractals! They are an infinite sequence of complex patterns. I believe our universe operates under the same principles of fractals.
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 their is nothing proven to exist, which does not have it's creator... you create ideas when you think, sound when you speak etc... you were created by your parents. add up all the creator/creation associations just among humans and you approach infinite numbers. this relationship exists among all things...the creator/creation relationship is the trademark left on everything by the creator of this universe, and it can be traced back beyond the origin of this universe.
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 all human logic systems are built on axioms. the axiom of infinity, numbers, zero, time, etc...it can be demonstrated that all things are created...EVEN axioms are created to our knowledge base by their creators, the human mind. There is one axiom that has been overlooked. The axiom of creation: anything that acts on itself, something else, or its environment is a creator. Anything changed by itself, something else, or its environment is a creation. it's the PRIME AXIOM
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH The deep laws of the cosmos are not trivial and nor can they be comprehensible to the human mind. You need to start thinking outside the domain of human logic i.e. fractal nature of reality as I already proposed!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 chaos theory is a prime example of how human intellect can't perceive eternal intelligence. Chaos is an observation, they call it chaos because we observe interactions and expect probable results but our ablilty to perceive, calculate or intuit all things is not possible, we are finite intellect. Eternal intellect is perfect beyond our understanding of perfection, because it operates where time = 0 and time = +-infinity simultaneously. We can't compete with that.
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 heh I didn't know there was a field of study using the illogical unless you mean religion...heh, I know all about how religions have fractured truth. Fractals are not illogical, similar patterns repeated to varying scales kindof reflects my personal intuition that exsistence is a sequence of concentric spheres of reality.
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH So there is a creator in all of us? Can I create something from nothing if I have the right "energy".
jfleminator 8 months ago
@jfleminator can energy/matter be created or destroyed in this temporal space/time reality? no. could this space time reality have been created, from another reality, then injected with energy from that alternate reality .. yes... can we perceive into a trans-temporal reality? no. can we deduce this temporal reality to have been created from a pre-space-time reality? yes
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@jfleminator you think.. you create ideas, you walk you create locomotion, you fart, you create stink...everything you do is a creation of some sort...you were created by the mingling of the genes of your parents. you are a creator and a creation. the creator./creation associations in this reality can be counted. Everything that exists as known to us is either a creator, a creation or both.. count them all up. overwhelming self-evidence of creator/creation associations leads to the prime axiom
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH you think, ideas occur, you walk locomotion occurs, you fart, stink occurs... everything you do is an occurrance of some sort...you occurred through the mingling of the genes of your parents. you are an entity that is part of nature. the fact that 1+1 "creates" 2 means that there are infinitely many creator/creation associations in "this reality" and thus they cannot be counted. Has this never occurred to you? Words are meaningless in nature.
lnYourJeans 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans read your dictionary dude a creation is when something is caused to exist where it did not exist... an idea or thought is caused to exist where it did not previously exists, therefore its a creation. your foolish to try to detract from the truth of creations and creators in nature. nothing begets nothing, and every occurance has its creator. all things that exist are created to exist or they could not exist. read your dictionary :/
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH The laws of physics do not make reference to any lexicon. Give up on your quest for understanding along the path you have chosen - it will only be riddled with confusion. What I did in my earlier post was show that by using different words we can change the meaning of nature but still have it make sense. This is not how science works. Again, words are meaningless in nature.
lnYourJeans 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans a creator/creation association can be demonstrated for EVERYTHING that exists in our universe, and this self-evidence proves an axiom of creation. Without the axiom of creation, no other knowledge would be known, lexicon or not. because the knowledge or logic could not spawn out of nothing, it MUST first be created as an idea or thought. Words are required to describe nature, without them we'd have to resort to flinging poo. Your misuse of words cannot affect truth.
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans To use a word which does not fully describe an event is not nature's fault. Words are very important when trying to understand nature, and just because words which can make sense - but imply a different meaning - can be used, does not change the truth which appropriate words imply. Reality is a constant. Perceptions change, and words are created to more closely describe nature based on observations uncovered by our ever-evolving ability to more accurately perceive truth.
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH I've just re-read some of your earlier discussions with Fall. You state that beyond our reality, "all theories are speculation due to lack of OBSERVABLE DATA". Yet you then say that the Universe was "created" using dark energy and injecting it with an electromagnetic plazma. If I am not mistaken, there is no "OBSERVABLE DATA" that tells us that your idea is factually correct. By your own definition you must therefore be speculating. I trust you were already aware of this.
lnYourJeans 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans I never said a creator of this universe was observable, nor did I indicate proff of the existence of Dark energy. I said that an axiom of creation is self-evident and applies to everything that exists in our reality. Since our universe, and space-time exist as observable things in our reality, the axiom of creation can be used to accept - not prove - the existence of a creator of spacetime and of this universe, like we accept the concept of infinity as a truth.
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH Re: your last post. When we try to describe events in nature, relaying those details to other people is usually done using language. Maths/physics uses precise language which rarely includes the idea of a creator of the Universe. Yes, common sense implies that things have creators, but the world of the very small defies common sense. You would be wise to learn more and preach less. If you think you understand nature, you don't understand nature. You're just trying to be clever
lnYourJeans 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans Most scientists do not know about the axiom of creation and its importance. No scientific or mathematical knowledge would be known if not by application of the axiom of creation: it's obvious self-evidence is easily ignored. There are in fact fields of science that attempt to link our temporal reality to a trans-temporal reality.. the discipline of metaphysical science is gaining more acceptance day by day. I don't go there because i dont believe we can transcend time yet.
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans I don't preach anything. I use the traditional science knowledge I learned in university to produce nourishment in the form of fruit for millions of people. You may have eaten some of the fruit I produce using traditionally accepted scientific knowledge. I have created some specialized scientific knowledge specific to the various soil-types, elevations, and other environmentally unique conditions in my own orchards. Taming nature is my business. Rationality, my passion.
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans The world of the very small seems to indicate that every truth we can establish prompts many new questions for which no answers exist yet. I don't pretend to understand string theory. but then, I'm not even sure this theory has been associated to a specific hypothesis which has been proven to answer a question by experiment. I do know that we posess limited intellect by virtue of our temporal nature. It is only by axiomatic logic that we can accept concepts we're unable to prove.
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@ReligionlessFAITH Do some reading on the latest results relating to quark-gluon plasmas then get back to me on whether you still think string theory has not been associated with any experimental proof. Also, stop going on about your "axiomatic logic" crap - there are some things which can never be proven using our normal system of logic. If you had any formal mathematical education you should be aware of this. Take for example the Riemann Hypothesis. When you can prove that is true, let me know
lnYourJeans 8 months ago
@lnYourJeans I've read alot about strings... very little is said about their origin other than the postulation of their eistence... I don't doubt they may exist,
i just ask if anyone knows how they come to be. I'll keep the axiomatic logic thanks... strings might be an axiom for all you know.
Your think axiomatic logic is crap, so you think numbers, infinity, zero, time, etc are crap .. so you have no clue about reality. Unproven axioms is what math and science is built on fool.
ReligionlessFAITH 8 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 I'm far beyond agnostic. Religions are carnal inventions. Prophets are fotunetellers. God is abused by ANYONE who would impart eternal meaning to carnal words placed in God's mouth. The act of defining God with finite meaning puts "God" in a bottle, but we are in the Creator's bottle. I build faith in an infinitely more perfect than perfect Creator. not faith in carnal words written in carnal vocabularies. Theres a big difference between faith in God and faith in religion
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 In 1975, I used hubble's law and observations of several quasars to show that the universe was expanding at an accelerated rate. It was a paper I did for my astronomy course at Brock University. My professor gave me a 99% grade on the paper but in big bold letters he wrote "your observations and calculations are well documented and the presentation of your theory is well done. I am deducting one mark because you're wrong"! heh... I wasn't wrong, still have the paper :P
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 strings are eternal ... rofl .. eternal means all things past and all things future existing simultaneously in an infintessimally small increment of time such that time = 0. you may be able to tell yourself that you can observe matters eternal, and when you can create a universe like ours, I might believe you, in the meantime stick with temporal perception and explain how strings come to exist.
ReligionlessFAITH 9 months ago
Thank you. your video was very informative and clear.
merlin711oregon 9 months ago
a holagraph is an image produced by spliting a lazer beam and having it hit it self that energy forms rippples in the plastic sheet which you look through in regular light and a 3-D image appears so we can create our own strings of energy by bending back on itself any form of energy. even our own cirulatory system is a form of rotating energy (get it circulatory "circular") or a huracane energy. For your super computer just e-mail me at wbprotime@gmail.com
wbPROTIME 9 months ago
bisons FFS
shytcity3000 10 months ago
how does a string of infinite length connect to itself at the ends?
JahbeOneKanollbee 10 months ago
this is one ugly guy
NiteAngel 10 months ago
i am a chassidic noahide, i don't think u know anything about ein sof. god doesn't exist. because it is not bound by space or time.
yomamasofat87 10 months ago
and you've just set the limits on your own brain
rebirthsaph 10 months ago
Comment removed
rebirthsaph 10 months ago
When he was drawing the human, I was like "WTF!"
tafwolf 10 months ago
Its called 'M-Theory'. I don't know what you do for a living, but I don't think your anything close to a physist.
DoucheDickMcGee 10 months ago 12
why did he start talking about a god that doesn't exist? religion is for those who don't understand science.
muzzman48 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@muzzman48 Do you know what 'science' means?
matthew3774 10 months ago
I liked the meassage .
solvssod 10 months ago
This guy doesn't know the scientific meaning of the word "theory"
The video has nothing to do with physics & explains nothing.
It is merely theosophical speculation.
It has no relation to any scientific study, except that he mentions some scientific concepts he obviously does not understand.
In short, it is religious bullshit with some misunderstood buzzwords thrown in.
He "Plays the role" of physicist, because he is NOT a physicist.
Walter, you're confused and your drawings suck.
OldSchoolSkill 11 months ago 25
@OldSchoolSkill I agree. He's not a physicist at all. He even states that the string vibrates in three dimensions, yet makes no reference to multidimensional aspects. A really misleading video, based on speculation, that can only fuel the deluded mind.
lnYourJeans 8 months ago
@OldSchoolSkill You are wrong in a way, because the holographic universe does exist and the energy of humans too. This is not a religious thing... but this video is a little bit confusing xD
Obviously here are not presented scientific studies...
JaViNrY14 7 months ago
A bit odd. Some of it was good for a bit there. It got weird, quickly.
BendableCard 11 months ago
what is this i don't even
ReverseDFatE 11 months ago
I think it is an interesting video. Maybe you should study a bit of string theory and see if your theory could be consistent with it!
TriKri 11 months ago
5:05 It's dirty Harry!
TriKri 11 months ago
fuck this video
saf509 11 months ago
I know it's easily confused but this is in fact the theory of NOTHING.
momsazombie1 11 months ago 2
so ur sayin that humans are made up of vibrations!!! wat the f**k
seehan1 11 months ago
@seehan1 If you study just a bit of quantum mechanics you will find out that it is indeed the case.
TriKri 11 months ago
Hey, mu name is Kristian :) im gona play the role of a pornProducer. If you belive me, take of your cloths.....
Aikwood666 11 months ago
Is your real name EVERYTHING ?
isleofyew1 11 months ago
YAY, we finally found the theory for everything! Wheee \o/
Danekris 11 months ago
yea rite
BRTSNful 11 months ago
we also have shit cycles and they seems to be filling your head
farlex80 11 months ago
He started to lose me when he drew the man. When he started talking about cycles, I was already looking for the my mouse. When he said, "Free Will". I had to respond.
@wbPROTIME
This is not a theory. You assert God where you should proclaim ignorance.
Morkindie 11 months ago
Hi Walter
DNAatWork 11 months ago
make it up why dont you. Math is where the answer is not doodle drawings.
FOXnewsAlien 11 months ago
hahahaha, this has to be a new kind of mental disease
nestorlovesguitar 11 months ago
he is a quack scientist.
xHizukax 11 months ago
WHY?! Why the are there waves, why is there infinite, why are there strings and forces? Any other video I look at answers these questions to a great degree, but you just say yeah here's all this shit and here's what it does, trust me, I'm dressed like a doctor.
Screw you dude, please break your camera before you can poison someone else into truly believing whatever it is that you're trying to actually say.
MetallicStevie 11 months ago
hahahaha troll
banana1337kivi 11 months ago
this guy is mentally retarded... the string has infinite length? its supposed to be microscopically small... all straight lines are curves depending on our perspective? what the fuck>? string theory has nothing to do with strings vibrating and forming all the shapes like a human body and triangles and squares.... string theorists believe that microscopically small strings vibrate at different frequencies to form sub atomic particles...
18man69 1 year ago
@18man69 ......and subatomic particles form atomic particles and atomic particles form your body so what the fuck you are talking about ?
sahneboy79 1 year ago
@18man69
LMAO hahahahaha
jixmixfix 10 months ago
11th dim.. its all relative.
lucusgriffin 1 year ago
Typically human, a restcricted ability to understand the meaning of life, creating more confusion than sense . Tangenting speculation and opinion going in the wrong direction.
lucusgriffin 1 year ago
Freewill and physics don't match
11918151119 1 year ago