Added: 3 years ago
From: IndyCCWSF1
Views: 89,028
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (199)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow. Very good overtake

  • The Best of NickHeidfeld period!

    

  • Heidfeld done him up there. That was so close to a collision at the apex! Impressive driving.

  • What is it with these two,every time they meet on track Heidfeld gives good lectures to Alonso.I remember Monaco 2005,Bahrain 2007,Magny-Cours 2007 and 2008,Fuji 2007 etc...I think every driver has it's favorite to fight on the track and Alonso is Heidfeld's one.

  • cool overtaking from heidfeld against alonso :D

  • heidfeld is so underrated...

  • @0casin0 or over. He had good cars to prove with, but never achieved.

  • @MrPifta

    he hadn't good cars. just one (2008 i think) the rest wasn'T pretty good

  • That was close!

  • Eso ha sido facil.. xD

  • I like Alonso more than Heidfeld although i'm german. But a overtaking like this is not bad.

  • Best beard in F1.

  • The thing for me with Nick is that he is technically good, enjoys the sport, is a team player and a good guy. However he doesn't seem to have that sheer desire and drive to win stuff. He hasn't been given winners cars yes, but even in the Jordan Schumacher drove like he was aiming for #1.

  • @nickJod1234

    Yeah, we see a lot of that now when he is driving for Mercedes in 2010 and 2011. Either he drives just for the fun and to make up the numbers, or he is way past his best, or he never was that fast to begin with just blessed with a damn fine car and great strategy from Ross Brawn. So which one is it?

    It is however clear he is not driving for number 1 when Rosberg is outracing him in most races.

  • @McLarenMercedes That's true. Unfortuneatley for Rosberg even showing he is quicker isn't enough to be the favourite. I would like to see Nico win a race soon.

  • @McLarenMercedes

    michael schumachers succes was a mix of everything of the above.

    He's a fast driver just not that competitive anymore, he got nothing to prove :)

  • he is underrated - yes

    cuz he suck!!!

  • damn bmw had power

  • @covGuk oh yes. they had the biggest top speed.

  • I cant believe Alonso didnt give him the finger!

  • !!Give Nick the right car and he´ll be world champion =)

  • The only sad thing about this is the sound of the traction control :S

  • This is why Renault need this man in there car right now..

  • thats the only problem with f1, you gotta have a good car if u wanna win the wdc at the right time too, heidfeld has all the crudentials to become a wdc, but his luck didnt fall into place

  • Qucik Nick

  • Give Nick a good car and World Champion will come his way... some day...

  • If Nick scores pts in the Asian races and Brazil, he will keep the seat in 2011.

    I told Peter Sauber =)

  • Nick is back :) !!!

  • @Padex16 I know, Sauber's not the team to get him a win but it's a start.

    Heidfeld for Ferrari.

  • wooowwwww great overtaking

  • Quick Nick!!!!!!

  • I miss him in, but im sure he will have a cockpit in 2011!

  • la diferencia de carga de combustible cambia mucho el rendimiento de los coches...

  • Heidfeld is a great driver. Very consistent and smart.

  • can't blame the driver for engine blow-ups? of course you can, once the data is analyzed! the only difference now is so much electronic stuff on the cars help reduce this possibility on the drivers behalf...

  • @cafedelmar99 who told you this shit?? I want NAMES!

  • go nicko go nick

  • Miss Nick why did he lose out on a seat yet Kubica gets a seat?? He outperformed him in 3 out of 4 seasons

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch are you an idiot?? 2006 - Kubica has raced just some races, 2007- Kubica had constant technical problems, he was just about to win Chinese GP when his car failed while leading the race, 2008- no comment- Kubica was the World Champion that season considering his car, 2009- Kubica has made the only good race for BMW through the whole season - GP Brazil. 2010 - where is Robert now?? Where is Nick?? Robert is fighting for WC in a very average car!

  • @legia97

    2008 Hamilton was champion, u wanna know why simples he deserved coz he fought for it. Kubica is a good driver i dont doubt that however he cannot get the title this year, pray tell why?? Again simples he cant do it in that car oh yeh and he is a car breaker. U cant call me an idiot over personal opinion and fact 2007 Heidfeld outperformed Robert, 2009 outperformed Robert. All Robert did was grump about the team and the car. Nick got on with the job.

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch you aren't idiot, you just don't know anything about F1. Car breaker?? what the fuck does it mean??Is it his fault when his engine fails?? In 2007 Robert had technical problems in almost every race so you can't compare them. 2009?? Nick had just 2 points more which he gained in the last race when shitty BMW strategy did not let Robert to score points.

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch Then Nick wasn't even able to do even one good race in 2009 despite BMW 2009 suited him much morte than Robert (Pole is much taller and heavier). Robert is a fture WC, Nick is just good, but average driver without even 1 GP win

  • @legia97 Funnily enough a car breaker is someone who breaks cars. I have watched F1 since I was 6 years old and U can break an engine by pushing it far (too much revs etc). Oh and Shitty BMW sauber strategy? Kubica was in the points in Abu Dhabi but he decided to spin trying to overtake Buemi. Oh and Kubica got his win when Hamilton decided to ram into kimi in the pit lane. Oh and Nick did get a podium in 2009 coz he used his brain and made a strategy work for him, & jumped from 10th to 2nd

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch You compromised yourself. You have no influence on your engine by your driving style. If you are able to brake it, it means you are faster than your teammate or that the engine is a shit. You don't understand F1 at all. Watch Abu Dhabi race again and stop bullshitting. Robert has at least won a race, Nick was too weak for that. Malaysia 2009?? Don't make me laugh, Nick was 2nd just by pure case. Robert had engine failure on formation lap idiot!

  • @legia97 rite u fool!!!! An engine can b damaged by 2 too much Rev with comes from not changing gear or over acceleration! A suspension can b damaged by riding the corners 2 heavily i.e. Petrov. And Engines r not just used for a formation lap they have last more than 1 race!!! Abu Dhabi Kub didnt utilise his strategy i.e. OVERTAKE like he was supposed to. And dont call sum1 weak he is prob a far better driver than u and add better person. Malaysia he showed guts by not pitting like everyone else

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch idiot! there is never too much revs! These are racing drivers idiot! Damaging suspention is completely different subject! Did Kubica has EVER damaged the suspension?? You don't know anything about F1. I am a racing driver so you surely can not compete unless you are as well. This engine in Malayis was COMPLETELY NEW! You just don't like Kubica and you are too ignorant to admit he is much better than Heidfeld.

  • @legia97 That is it you bloody fool. I race cars aswell and THERE IS ALWAYS SUCH A THING AS TOO MUCH REVS!! The statement came from 2 experianced racing drivers that do commentary for BBC! If you hold your car in the red zone, like driving down the motorway at 65mph in second gear then you are going to blow the engine. That includes F1, WRC, and drag cars. F1 cars are delicate the engine has to heated slowly b4 being used, and oil must be fed into the car intravenously! I dont hate RK

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch show me THE SOURCE of this nonsense information idiot! Let's laugh together! what idiot have told you that it's drivers fault if his engine blows up!

  • Furthermore do u feel that Buemi, Jaime & Rosberg all good drivers in their own rite are weak because they havent won a race. U tell others that they are ignorant however u r the obsessive with Kubica. Surely if u claim he should've been WDC 08 then why did he sign with Renault? Im sure that McLaren or the then Brawn GP would have overlooked his performance in 09 & take him for 2010 yet they didnt. I never said that Nick was better than Kubica however Nick is more reliable and wont blame a team

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch Nick can never blame BMWSauber cause he was always ultraprotected by them. Robert was treated very bad there and didn't tell a thing. If I'd be on his place, I'd just smash the team even if they would kick me out next season, I wouldn't give a fuck about that. Rosberg is a very good driver indeed, Algersuari is also promising. However I'm Alonso fan

  • @legia97 I think that both drivers were treated very badly by the team in 09, especially since neither learnt about BMW pulling out from BMW themselves! Peter Sauber however I respect he has sacrificed everything for the team he built with his own two hands. I never said that Nick was blaming BMW he was well aware of his mistakes Quali in particular and was willing to learn from his mistakes. If a team treated me badly i probably wouldnt smash the body of the team i.e. engineers but bosses yes!

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch Nick has no reason to blame BMWSauber, really. They really cared about him incredibly and he had his warm and nice seat there. Don't you know that Nick has a record of consecutive terminated races from 2007 (last retirement in Japanese GP if I remember good)till 2009? It's not just a pure case. His equipment was just top. About failures still- the only thing you can blame driver is tyre failure (or consumption). Suspension sometimes as well (but not always!)

  • @legia97 I wasnt referring to mechanical issues rather how they were treated as people. Nick was treated well bcoz he knows the team (Sauber). What I meant was that the BMW part of the team was very clinical and didnt treat their drivers as well as they should have. I did know bout Nicks record it eclipsed Schumi's and he is always known for his consistency. Nicks issue with Quali related to tyre temp in 08 (other reasons 2) something I know Brawn suffered from last season.

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch But you can not blame any driver for engine blow-up, cause that means only that the engine has some defect, nothing more. A racing driver is pushing the engine always to the edge, that is motorracing. Offcourse you can ease down a bit when you are leading the race and everyone is much, much behind you, but that is not the case.

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch About consistency, I wouldn't say Robert was less consistent than Nick. Robert was just very quick so he naturaly took more risks while fighting for higher positions (also for the engine!)

  • @legia97 I think it just has to do with luck in the end. I mean both drivers did get caught up in crashes last season i.e Vettel and Sutil. I think it also has to do with the engines capability as well. Also being aggressive with a car will make it faster but it can backfire on u. However smooth drivers lose the speed but are easier on the car. The ideal solution would be 2 hav a combo of the 2 which never happens. Nick is smoother than Robert but Robert is quicker bcoz he is more aggressive

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch In fact look at Hamilton this year. He has the fastest car, he is one of the fastest drivers but sometimes he forgets that he is racing in F1 and not on playstation with his brother. He often destroys tyres by his aggresive driving and the result is Jenson winning 2 GP's already and Lewis struggling to compete with others

  • @legia97 Exactly everyone thought that Jenson would lose out to Hamilton this season but so far he is showing everyone that he is a worthy WDC. He uses his brains and Prost like driving to win races. I think that being easy on the tyres will be a big advantage with no refueling this season. Personally I would like Jenson to hold onto his title this year as he is one of my favs. But I would also like to see Hamilton get his act together in Spain, he is just so damn fast.

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch Yes, you are right. But anyway Hamilton is faster than Button. Honestly I also prefer Button to Hamilton. Hamilton is damn fast, he just need to think a bot more while driving.

  • @legia97 You are right Lewis is so much faster than Jenson. But because he isn't thinking as much in the car he is losing out to the drivers around him. I think Lewis can learn a lot from Jenson this season and improve overall as a driver.

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch I'm sure Lewis will improve and will do better than Jenson. Lewis is really ultrafast and impressive. In minor formula's he was often competing with Robert Kubica and it was 50:50 for them.

  • @legia97 Precisely only then can we give a true comparison between Jenson and Lewis

  • @legia97 In fact im quite fond of him however I feel he gets too much credit for only winning one race! Vettel, Hamilton and Alonso are far better drivers! Also I feel the Polish are too hard on Heidfeld, it seems to me u and ur nation blame BMW for Roberts unreliability I wonder if he DNFs this season will u blame Renault?? F1 is a great sport however u are being far too judgemental on other peoples opinions just because U dont agree with them doesnt mean they are unwarrented.

  • @CrazyKimonoBitch You opinion is useless. Every f1 expert will tell you that Kubica is among the best together with Hamilton, Alonso and maybe Vettel. Look at Kubica's position in the drivers championship this season and compare his car to others. He is absoutely the best, the same like he was in 2008

  • and kn0w what, kubica isn't a WC! it's fact! i'm going to laugh all the time if 10years coming, kubica still a car breaker and don't hold the WC title..

  • it isn't anyone pr0blem if most of Polish doesn't like heidfeld..maybe Polish can't accept the fact that their nation driver kubica is a car breaker, and was beaten by heidfeld except in 2008. if u don't have evidence, like u said heidfeld is backed-up by sauber, then u said even sauber don't want him, then stay away fr0m publishing any damn statement..i'm not an ignorant in f1..i've followed all the f1 news since i'm 11..

  • That BMW sounds beautiful, really snarls...

  • When was Nick so quick??I don't remember even one good race in 2008 when he was at least on Kubica'a level. Nick compromised himself that season and showed why he will never be a op driver. Kubica is something much better. He ahcived more in 3 years than Nick in 10. Nick will NEVER even win a race, you will see

  • @szynnszyll

    So you obviously don't remember the British GP that year when Heidfeld finished a strong 2nd behind Lewis, when everyone else was spinning off, including Kubica?

    P.S why must you hate on Nick? He's a nice guy that doesn't cause any drama and gets on with his job. Not the sort of person you should hate on.

  • @ ridoxsupra And you don't remember that Kubica had a technical problem during that race and had to start from 10th on the grid and quickly became 3rd, just after Nick(then went off due to aquaplaning). Nick didn't show anything in 2008. Check any other race in 2008. Nick is just average but he was strongly supported by Sauber, that's why many Poles don't like him. It's obvious.

  • in this race Alonso was lighter than heidfeld :P and Heidfeld finishes 4th Alonso 5th.... Heidfeld was on this race better...

  • hahaha, I would like to ask people who don't know ANYTHING about F1 to stop writing here, ok? let's start from you MaxMSC97! Alonso is the best F1 driver nowadays!

  • are you idiot? Kubica will be the driver nr 1

  • idiot, Kubica had at least a well deserved podium, in Brazil, Heidfeld was second by pure case in Malaysia (in fact he was very slow there), Robert had technical problems in many races that Nick didn't have. If not stupid move by Vettel in Australia, Robert would smash Nick even with points in 2009. Just look what he did with him in 2008. Nick was like a novice, Robert was the driver of the year 2008.

  • Contradition - Nicks podium finish in Sepang was not pure luck, in fact it was bad luck that he did not win. I admit that if the race would have been stopped on lap later, Nick would have finished third instead of second (since Timo Glock overtook on the lap that was annulled), but without an interruption (or with a later interruption) Nick would have had the best stakes to even win the race, since he was the only top 3 at that time on rain weather tyres (Button and Glock were on intermeds).

  • Heidfeld was going on 4 stops - he had a very light car and despite this wasn't able to be on top.

  • Comment removed

  • Nick started from 11th place on the grid and according to your words he was scheduled for a four stop strategy? You must be very convinced of yourself to believe in what you're saying....

  • check this out, ok? Nick was on 4 stops.

  • where is the evidence for that?

  • check yourself . Nick was 4 times in box during Malaysian GP 2009

  • Cntradiction. How can one come up from 11th place on the grid to 2nd within less than 20 laps including the most pit stops of the entire grid? The British 'GPI Magazine' publishes all pit stops of all drivers in their race reports. For car No.5 (Heidfeld) it reads one sole pit stop (from dry tyres to full wets) on lap 19 (out of 31 completed). I re-studied the race video after your comment, Heidfeld stopped only once.

  • I don't know what idiots gave TCC -4, because Heidfeld did only do 1 stop. That's why he achieved that great 2nd place. You can't expect a miracle from him...

  • overall Nick had more points than Kubica when they teamed together,

  • Stop bullshiting you Heidfeld fans. Checked out how many times Kubica had technical problems and couldn't finish the race. Heidfeld was ultraprotected in Sauber and he was afraid to join Kubica in Renault now. Why do you think he was afraid? Because he knows that in normal team he has no chance with Kubica who is way faster (about 0,2-0,3 faster on 1 lap). He was just shitting in his pants

  • Heidfeld didn't go to Renault for 2 reasons - 1) They wanted a pay driver, and 2) He isn't from Eastern Europe for their Russian sponsors.

  • and he knows that renault sucks.... kubica is about to ruin his career there, just like villeneuve did with BAR

  • Haha, even Peter Sauber doesn't want Heidfeld! hahaha

  • A great effort. Heidfeld truly shone that year!

  • I really hope that nick gets a decent seat for 2010. I would love for McLaren to make ammends & give him the 2nd seat. Kimis a good driver but it is known that kimi is not as commited to development as some others. Hes known to want to do things his way or no way. Nick on the other hand is a team's dream driver as his commitment out of the car as well as technical feedback is one of the best. Thats why he is known as the most reliable driver.

  • Well done by QuickNick Heidfeld.

  • We won't see Kimi in the F1 next year.

    He'll be a rally driver.

    As for Heidfeld, his chances of being a McLaren driver are finished because Button took Kovalainen's spot.

    Heidfeld might have a chance at Mercedes GP (the old Brawn GP) as Niko Roseberg's team mate.

  • No, the place in Mercedes GP will take M.Schumacher or R.Kubica. Heidfeld is the third, worse option

  • alonso and heidfeld are by far the two strongest drivers when it's about battle sense. a shame heidfeld didn't win a gp yet...in about 160 gp? such a pity, mclaren should have chosen him instead of raikkonen in 2002..he would have won a title for them, i'm sure.

  • Yea it's funny. I THINK *not to sure* heidfeld actually did better than kimi at sauber in 01. But mclaren chose kimi which did pay off kind of. Heifeld's never been in a good car really and it is a shame he hasn't won since he came so close in canada 08. And also when heidfeld passes and battles with others it's top class u can see he's got skill but no win :( . I dunno if he get a second chance since sauber leaving.

  • @jraybay sauber got him to replace Pedro de la Rosa

  • @juansdf1 I havent heard about that. Is pedro done for this year or is Nick coming in 2011? D:

  • @jraybay yep heidfeld is in at singapore this year

  • @jraybay nick is coming in singapore

    and i don't wanna insult anybody here, but pedro has a lot more experience than nick

  • @juansdf1 Pedro doesnt have as much experience as nick actual. Pedro has been a test pilot for so long. He only relly raced for jaguar before become mclaren test pilot. Pedro has more experience with this 2010 sauber yes tho. I thot maybe he should finish 2010 after hearing this news :\ . I wish Nick luck its good see him again : D

  • @jraybay test drving also givbe sexperience... but anywauy, I hope pedro goes to hispania next year :)

  • @juansdf1 jajaja not commpare with race experience :P . I think its kind of early to sack Pedro. the sauber was not a good car for sometime in thes season he and Kamui dont get to show much but Kamui is doing very good now. No HRT is even worse lol. they wont be good team for long time xD

  • @jraybay I agree with you, but maybe HRFT uses the Toyota TF100 next year!

  • so would have kimi if his car would have been more reliable.

  • Well, that is just your opinion. The facts are that Nick was to slow to be a top driver and stop telling nonsenses that his "statistics doesn't show how fast he is". That is the biggest nonsense I have ever heard. Fastest lap is not taking pole position, nor winning the race or a brilliant CONSISTENT driving. Kubica is just another sort of driver, a future champion, no comparison between those two.

  • the only reason raikkonen didnt bring any titles to mclaren was because the reliability of the car was so shit it barely finnished and race and he still managed to come second twice

  • That's also what everyone said about Button the last years. Button and Heidfeld are in some ways similar; very reliable, smooth driving style and they also have some brains. By the way, Kimi didn't win the title with Mclaren either, so I don't think it was the best choice to have hired him that soon.

  • Button is better than Heidfeld, not much better but better. Heidfeld is able to drive good, but it's not enough to be a WC

  • True. Actually McLaren had a mutual (verbal) agreement with Nick to take the seat initially as Nick has been groomed by Mercedes as a youth. Nick also totally outshined Kimi at Sauber. It was only towards the end that Kimi was selected as McLaren wanted a rookie in kimi, so Merc relented. Nick has been very unlucky but has been solid. Nick is known as the most reliable driver. I really hope nick gets his big break cos when he does he will be winning. Ive also met him & he is 1 of the nicest guys

  • very good heidfeld.

  • you can almost feel that the car is perfect to drive

  • good job:)

  • heidfeld8=====D<(  )-:alonso

  • Xfueraaa jojo

  • That's what seperates Alonso from most of the grid, the fact is he will allow another driver to make a pass. :)

  • wow pretty amazing overtake there

  • gran gran gran sorpasso!!!!!!!!!!

  • fantastic overtake of Nick!!!!!!!!!

    he´s a grat overtaker :)

  • i remember being so happy when i saw this live

  • excelente

  • Another brilliant move by the very underrated Nick Heidfeld.

  • im an alonso fan but that move was lush

  • Brave stuff from Nick Heidfeld second video i've seen so far with these two head to head. Great driving from both drivers.

  • I think Alonso did the same move on him this season 09 same corner? or Kubica

  • did heidfeld miss a gear while coming out of the last corner in this video?? m asking jst bcaz of the sound the gear box is makin...

  • no the sound is just  the traction control. 2007 was the last season they used them.

  • o Alonso tomou uma por fora do Heidfeld???

    kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

  • xD Heidfeld ur serious, we re talking aboiut F1, Heifled loooooooooooooool.

  • Heidfeld giving Alonso what he deserved how satisfying! =D

  • Alonso is much better than Hamilton so shut up

  • How come he was beaten by Hamilton in the same car? (by the way i have no probs with Kubica)

  • Well. the team pointed out ruthlessly for Hamilton in 2007. Alonso was treated like 2nd driver. I think Alonso is the best one in F1 now, much better then Kubica or Hamilton (at least at this stage)

  • Fair enough for this year but what about last year?

  • Well last year even a monkey in a Ferrari or McLaren should score the title in the middle of the season, but all 4 drivers from McLaren & Ferrari were so weak that Kubica in a very weak BMWSauber (surely not a winning car)had the chances to win the title till Chinese GP (!)

  • Then surely Kubica is a better driver than even Alonso if he can keep a BMW in contention for so long last year and unlike the others including Alonso he made no errors and it was only lack of performance that sadly held him back =(

  • Kubica is a very good driver. I think he is not worse than Hamilton, but both Hamilton and Kubica are worse than Alonso. I am not saying that they will always be, but for now Alonso is more mature driver. Look at Alonso in last races of season 2008! It was genial!In such a weak car being on top!

  • i suppose naturally you support Kubica in a straight fight with Hamilton and Alonso (supporting your countryman)? Also is what your saying the possible reason why Renault appears imbalanced (Alonso getting more obvious help than Piquet)?

  • Yes, I like Kubica, but I am not blind and I can see he still have plenty of room for improvement. When you compare him with Alonso, you clearly see his disadvantages, like missing experience. It's also obvious Alonso is nr 1 in Renault. The same like Hamilton in McLaren, hm?

  • One thing bafles me about Alonso though, why do that unnecessary red mist moment in the Hungary pitlane, 2007, when Hamilton was going to incur the wrath of Ron Dennis anyway for not following procedure?

  • Well that was emotional, but he had to show to Hamilton who should be number one in McLaren team- he was 2 times WC

  • I'm british, but i know in my heart of hearts Hamiltons not perfect. even so it was a brilliant achievement to beat a 2 times world Champion in his rookie season and in the same car, and fought him off in a straight fight. By the way do you know who came top in the Autosport top 100 drivers 2008?

  • Yes, but as I already told, McLraen didn't play fair with Alonso. Hamilton has been given all the best during 2007 and Alonso not. Autosport 2008? probably Hamilton if you are asking...hm?

  • I'll tell you who it was... Kubica =D

  • Well...it's nice to hear...I also think Kubica is great, but he needs to prove that he is a real Champion still :) He is still very young so he has time to do it :) I am afraid only that FIA will not let a polish driver to win the chamionship :(

  • what makes you say that? I think with the right equipment Kubica can and will do it i'm certain of it. =D

  • There aren`t the same cars. McLaren Electronic Systems, manipulated Alonso`s car in the last 6 races...

  • Comment removed

  • alonso was having problems becos the day before the roof fell down and damaged his car... so that was why heidfeld overtook him

  • It was similar playing as Vettel vs Kubica in Melbourne...

  • yes but australia track is very small and heidfeld has loooot of place

  • the curve was significantly tighter in Australia. That's why Kubica & Vettel crashed

  • JOJO NICE OVERTAKE!!!!

  • Crazy overtake he went round the outside of Turn 4!

    NUTS!

  • that was a crazy overtake by Heidfeld, really, really risky, kamikaze. Probably the only way to overtake Alonso lol

  • nelson you are totally right...

  • What a wonderful overtaking by Nick, nice clean move right on the limit, good attitude by Alonso too, that's one nice and clean racing, that's the way F1 should be.

  • held nick