He actually messed up on the last one. The correct answer is positive 3, not negative 3. He lost a minus in the denominator. You can also see the mistake when you graph this function on Ti-84 when it is clearly shown that as x goes to negative infinity the function approaches positive 3, not a negative 3.
actually its going to be a horizontal asymptote, saying tangent i think implies your talking about a line that originates from a curved line, also the horizontal asymptote in the first problem will actually be the same as negative infinity also.
Nice
moneylandusa 3 months ago
He actually messed up on the last one. The correct answer is positive 3, not negative 3. He lost a minus in the denominator. You can also see the mistake when you graph this function on Ti-84 when it is clearly shown that as x goes to negative infinity the function approaches positive 3, not a negative 3.
aliaksandrhn 6 months ago
@aliaksandrhn he did do 3..
che3zeman 2 weeks ago
at 18c shouldnt the denominator have 3/x-1/x?
YaStrange1 9 months ago
@YaStrange1 yeah it should be.......
txxli 9 months ago
@txxli @YaStrange1 no since you're dividing 3x by x so the x cancels out
satanicsheep135 2 months ago
actually its going to be a horizontal asymptote, saying tangent i think implies your talking about a line that originates from a curved line, also the horizontal asymptote in the first problem will actually be the same as negative infinity also.
colinwar 1 year ago
@colinwar
Thank you for telling me I said tangent line over asymptote. They are horizontal asymptotes. Thanks.
RobbWorld 1 year ago
:) thank you so so so much!!
LivingbyWill 1 year ago
Thanks so much, I actually get it now! :D
minaminamelody 1 year ago
@minaminamelody
That's awesome. I have a lot more videos at wowmath.org
RobbWorld 1 year ago