In actual battlefield there will not be any Concrete raod for this Foster-Miller's device. Can it ride as smoothly in a rough terrain like it is dong now? The opponent will need a bigger 'shot gun' type gun to nutralize it. Moreover it doesnot have that maneuverability like a regular soldier.
Add thermal heat tracking. Input Human body shape recognition. Edit a GPS "kill zone". Post your trespassers will be shot sign and you have a great new security system in place :D
i would bleach to deaf if i'd bump on one of those little MTF then i will flee faster than the great Hussein Bolt himself and if you wanna fight them at least you need to got yourself a RPG or something heavy anyway
So, 5 minutes into its programmed mission, it'd get pulled over, the internal robot AI throw to the ground and cuffed, its weapons consficated, and the mobile base would get towed for no good reason.
And if it was in Texas, the robot AI would get cuffed AND shot, and the cop would claim that it was "brandishing a weapon".
Yep and would get run over at night by a long sited whitey in a Fseries, the whitey would be condemned for a racially motivated attempt to kill, the machine would be given a medal and then would run for president...The CIA would no doubt not like the black machine cause they know it watches dirty terminator movies in secrete, of course the machine will bang the public with the black discrimination vote and ask for the brothers to rise up against...Whts a machine supposed to do...
Those laws don't define robots, they're just proposed guidelines to make robots safe. A robot is any system in which a computer controls moving parts (other than things used for computing, like motors on hard drives, fans, etc.).
But still, that would make this thing a remote controlled toy, not a robot. A robot is an independent machine, that does not recquire a human controlling it.
That may be how you define it, but there's no consensus on that definition. The mars rovers are considered robots, but so far they have all been mostly human controlled and the Canadian robotic arm on the space station always has a human operator. The FIRST robotics competition is consists almost entirely of remote controlled gameplay, but the machines are still called "robots".
That's because they are using the term incorrectly. The term robot is actually quite defined, and there is no alternate interpretation. Robot is a popular term for anything that moves and is not a lawnmower, but the use of the word is quite incorrect. In short, this is not a robot, and it's not just by my definition. Robots are independent, possibly sentient machines, but not remote controlled.
They might not be using the word the way it was once defined, but that doesn't make it incorrect. The nature of language is that most of us use a word in a particular way, regardless of whether our definition matches the "official" one. If you decide to revert to the "correct" definition, you're defeating the point of using a common language.
Language is flexible of course, but there is a clear reason why we have a word for "robot", just like we have different words for doors and windows. If we started referring to a window as a "door" the words would kind of defeat their purpose. The dictionary is quite clear as well: "A machine that resembles a human and does mechanical, routine tasks on command. Any machine or mechanical device that operates automatically with humanlike skill."
thats what robots look like in childrens movies. Not necessarily in real life. sure there are robots that resemble humans, but there are also robots that don't.
A robot is a machine, designed to execute one or more tasks repeatedly, with speed and precision. There are as many different types or robots as there are tasks for them to perform. A robot can be controlled by a human operator, sometimes frome a great distance. But most robots are controlled by a computer.
Since any human input/output via video + remote control could increasingly be controlled by improvements in AI, i think its ok to describe these as robots. robot bodies perhaps more accurately.
Well world war 2 is long past and now the only people we are fighting are terrorists and religious fundamentalists that are against the progress of the world. If you are trying to say that current islamist fighters are righteous fighters for freedom, you're wrong. Besides, machines reduce casualties, they are military equipment, they don't control anything or make any decisions, they just facilitate military action.
imagine what would happen if your gov became corrupt. And you and your family had to fight the heads of state. Now all you have are hand held guns. the gov has remote controlled tanks, air planes and gun ships. Does that fight seem fair?
Who cares if they're remote controlled? Even with the current military we'd all be completely fucked if the government decided to scrap the bill of rights.
What? The bill of rights refers to the first ten amendments of the American constitution (which I hope still means something), and they were written by James Madison (who was born in Virginia, which is definitely not in England, Scotland, or Wales).
I'm sure the British have one or more documents they call a bill of rights, but that's not what most Americans think of when we use the term.
this is saving lives, lets say that your brother went off to war and instead of sending him on a mission they send a robot and the robot gets shot to hell it essentially saved your brothers life, id rather lose a robot than a person
think of the people at the other end of that robot dont they have family's. Dont they have mothers,sisters,brothers and fathers. Dont only think of yourselves.
are you a soldier? if you saw some action im sure you would rather have this thing getting shot up than you. dont try to get all macho i can barely type im shaking so hard
So what question should we ask? How can I kill somebody at great personal risk to myself...if you're asking that question you will be dead. Fucking retard
Maby when the war is over they will start selling them on the civilian market. Move over Rover, robot taking over! At least witht he robot, you won't have to clean up poop.
they showed it on futur weapons the can shoot any gun and have pretty much no recoil. the put a metal storm on it , a 50 cal sniper and it has like no recoil thats crazy.
Well, during a war we have to kill people. It's been the same way for at least 5,000 years. Did something change to wear that doesn't apply anymore? Or are you just naive and unrealistic about things?
So the fact that it's been going on for 5000 years makes it okay not to change? Unrealistic? Unrealistic is expecting a country's people to act in a civil manner, whilst the constitution allows them to carry deadly weapons. Explain to me how it is any less uncivilised to be killed at war, than killed by a serial killer? You're killed, family will suffer equally. Nobody has the right to kill, and nobody has the right to support killing. Arguing with you is no different to arguing with a killer.
Nicely translated. Seeing as you have your dictionary open, why don't you look up the word "sheep". While your at it, look up the word "blind", and the word "bigot", and maybe the phrase: "self righteous". You haven't written anything to support the notion of justifiable murder... Can you give me any reason a country should go to war with another, that outweighs the value of human life? Careful now, "we're American, and that makes us right in God's eyes" doesn't count. Nor does money.
Well, I guess you win then. Good job. Funny how morons jump on the pro war band wagon wearing a "reckless" facade, when they have never had to face even the remote possibility of a threat against their lives. I'm sure if you had a mouthful of M16, you'd probably change your tune pretty quick. When civilians act like war is cool, you can tell they watch way too much tv, which is funny, because you were accusing someone else of watching too much. Don't act smart if you got fuck all to back it up.
where did I say I was on the pro war bandwagon? I have certainly pointed out that I am on the America ought to have the best shit to fight wars with bandwagon, and if anybody thinks we ought not be the dominant military power on earth, they are naive and furthermore, fuck them.
I don't understand the American mentality. Why they think that they are the chosen ones, and the rest of the world is evil. You really think the people running your military are any less corrupt than the people they are attacking? You think every war your country engages in, they are the ones with the clear conscience? You think your country is out to save inncoent lives, even when they are out there taking them? Your a fucking idiot.Your the naive one. Stop throwing that word around fuckhead.
People that want to kill you because you want to kill them? I'd feel defensive if USA wanted to see everyone who spoke with an Aussie accent dead, like they do people who wear towels on their heads. I'd relish the chance to see an American hypocrite getting castrated. Your military is least corrupt, thats why they are good? How do those two things relate? You've given me an opinion without offering any facts to support it. By the standards of anyone with half a brain, that makes you an idiot.
-.- americans land of the free home of the brave. we dont think the rest of the world is evil either. we give billions of dollars in helping other countrys....
wow. You've completely de-railed my entire argument! Well done. You know what... No, no, Matty, don't do it... Stupid people have a right to an opinion too. Unfortunately thats how George Bush got elected in the first place though. Maybe stupid people shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion unless they can prove that they spend at lease one minute of their day THINKING, and not always ACTING BEFORE THEY DO.
wow your talking to yourself amazing... wait a second your speaking american looks like you took the time to learn it. which means your probably just a wanna be terrorist
Englands people are against their countries involvement in iraq. Australias (my country) people are against its countries involvement in iraq. America was a country founded on war, and its people are desensitised to death, so much that they only take it seriously when the threat is against them. BTW, England pulled out, and so is my country now. America is now the laughing stock of the world. Eat shit.
americas the laughing stock of the world? dont you mean a superpower of the world. australia is a great country dont get me wrong but it was started by people who went to jail. look it up. america was started by people who didnt want to be under the crule rule of the king.
You contradict yourself with every comment. If America is superpower, why do they need our help? Yeah, our country was founded by convicts, but back then, they were punished for stealing bread to feed their starving families. Your country was founded by people who didn't want to be ruled by a king, now your whole country thinks they can act as king over the rest of the world. Shit is supposed to come out of your ass, not your mouth.
yeah well i dont understand your reasoning. i never said america needed any help.also guess what? stealing bread why would they do that. because they couldnt feed there familys ok ok. but they were to lazy to get a job. they stole instead of worked.they also had murderers there also
Um, idiot, English murderers in the 1700s were given the death sentence. Um, idiot, in the 1700's in England, people with jobs were still homeless. Um, idiot, whether or not you say USA needs help doesn't determine whether or not they need help, unless you're the president. Might be time for you to go to bed now, I think I hear your mum calling.
Oh, shit... Im sooooorrryyy! For those of you who need special help to understand things better, England has announced it's withdrawal from the war, as have Australia. They are still there, but whatever. What am I stuffing? I'm not really familiar with your lingo. Maybe if you said "go fuck yourself" I'd know what you were on about. Ooh, I wanna sound hard, whilst being careful about my language, just so my church friends don't think I'm bad. I won't swear, but I will support war. Goodo.
every1 outside america hates america because ur culture is soo messed up. u guys dont give a shit about the rest of the world u dont even no whats going on in the world. ur contry is soo fucked up u go to war because u want sum oil.
nop. you go on countries and actually kill the innocent and the harmless. and you dont go to any war if it is not money on it. remember the kurdos, they were slained like rats, but you did nothing.
In actual battlefield there will not be any Concrete raod for this Foster-Miller's device. Can it ride as smoothly in a rough terrain like it is dong now? The opponent will need a bigger 'shot gun' type gun to nutralize it. Moreover it doesnot have that maneuverability like a regular soldier.
jtillon1 4 months ago
こわw
Natty0301 6 months ago
1 step to terminator
Gcorme 8 months ago
Add thermal heat tracking. Input Human body shape recognition. Edit a GPS "kill zone". Post your trespassers will be shot sign and you have a great new security system in place :D
unmercifulgod 1 year ago
easy way to avoid this get on it and stand on the barrel so it cant get u
cprich22 2 years ago
if the nwo use this on us we better be prepared. for some serious gorilla tactics
youvement 2 years ago
stick an upside down dustbin on it, and make it say "EXTERMINATE"
walter0bz 2 years ago 4
@walter0bz LOL
tacticalbattledroid 1 year ago
This isnt a robot..........
This is a remote controlled weapons platform.
Maddpadd 2 years ago
how do you know that its remote controlled?
PoopinPat 2 years ago
whos gona care what its called when your looking down the barral.
cprich22 2 years ago
A while back someone asked me "What happened to that old Battle bots show?"
"They got drafted and sent to Iraq."
Theanchoritegarlic 2 years ago 18
i would bleach to deaf if i'd bump on one of those little MTF then i will flee faster than the great Hussein Bolt himself and if you wanna fight them at least you need to got yourself a RPG or something heavy anyway
turkhi 2 years ago
Ummm....what?
th3enigma 2 years ago
That looks like a T-1 to me! Terminator fans know what I mean.
We are doomed.
vnhcoltridge 2 years ago
Wurd up.
SkyNet FTW!!
cpo2u 2 years ago
This wouldn't work, because it is painted BLACK.
So, 5 minutes into its programmed mission, it'd get pulled over, the internal robot AI throw to the ground and cuffed, its weapons consficated, and the mobile base would get towed for no good reason.
And if it was in Texas, the robot AI would get cuffed AND shot, and the cop would claim that it was "brandishing a weapon".
cpo2u 2 years ago 4
Yep and would get run over at night by a long sited whitey in a Fseries, the whitey would be condemned for a racially motivated attempt to kill, the machine would be given a medal and then would run for president...The CIA would no doubt not like the black machine cause they know it watches dirty terminator movies in secrete, of course the machine will bang the public with the black discrimination vote and ask for the brothers to rise up against...Whts a machine supposed to do...
ChifeOkeef 2 years ago
ok imagine 120 of those around your neighborhood comanded to shoot humans on site
unscenebitch 2 years ago
just piss on it when its out off bullets and let it rust
realkingkado 2 years ago
this is not a robot, but a machine. ths would violate the 3 laws robots have, this is a radio controled machine called s.w.o.r.d. i think. no robot
BerendBroekhoff 2 years ago
Those laws don't define robots, they're just proposed guidelines to make robots safe. A robot is any system in which a computer controls moving parts (other than things used for computing, like motors on hard drives, fans, etc.).
balderdash707 2 years ago
But still, that would make this thing a remote controlled toy, not a robot. A robot is an independent machine, that does not recquire a human controlling it.
Imaculata 2 years ago
That may be how you define it, but there's no consensus on that definition. The mars rovers are considered robots, but so far they have all been mostly human controlled and the Canadian robotic arm on the space station always has a human operator. The FIRST robotics competition is consists almost entirely of remote controlled gameplay, but the machines are still called "robots".
balderdash707 2 years ago
That's because they are using the term incorrectly. The term robot is actually quite defined, and there is no alternate interpretation. Robot is a popular term for anything that moves and is not a lawnmower, but the use of the word is quite incorrect. In short, this is not a robot, and it's not just by my definition. Robots are independent, possibly sentient machines, but not remote controlled.
Imaculata 2 years ago
They might not be using the word the way it was once defined, but that doesn't make it incorrect. The nature of language is that most of us use a word in a particular way, regardless of whether our definition matches the "official" one. If you decide to revert to the "correct" definition, you're defeating the point of using a common language.
balderdash707 2 years ago
Language is flexible of course, but there is a clear reason why we have a word for "robot", just like we have different words for doors and windows. If we started referring to a window as a "door" the words would kind of defeat their purpose. The dictionary is quite clear as well: "A machine that resembles a human and does mechanical, routine tasks on command. Any machine or mechanical device that operates automatically with humanlike skill."
Imaculata 2 years ago
a robot doesnt have to resemble a human...
thats what robots look like in childrens movies. Not necessarily in real life. sure there are robots that resemble humans, but there are also robots that don't.
ChelseaLOSER 2 years ago 4
A robot is a machine, designed to execute one or more tasks repeatedly, with speed and precision. There are as many different types or robots as there are tasks for them to perform. A robot can be controlled by a human operator, sometimes frome a great distance. But most robots are controlled by a computer.
ChelseaLOSER 2 years ago 6
@ChelseaLOSER -
Since any human input/output via video + remote control could increasingly be controlled by improvements in AI, i think its ok to describe these as robots. robot bodies perhaps more accurately.
walter0bz 1 year ago
this is bad, just think some people NEED to fight; for instance the jewish resistance vs Germany in ww2
then some guy many many miles away not risking their life AT ALL! can kill so many courageous, righteous fighters for freedom.
unmanned weapons MUST! be a war crime!!
every1 please be mad at this technology NOW! or in the future it will be like Terminator, where the war robots control everything!
FriedCoD 3 years ago
Well world war 2 is long past and now the only people we are fighting are terrorists and religious fundamentalists that are against the progress of the world. If you are trying to say that current islamist fighters are righteous fighters for freedom, you're wrong. Besides, machines reduce casualties, they are military equipment, they don't control anything or make any decisions, they just facilitate military action.
MadPutz 3 years ago
FriedCoD, by your logic, guided missiles, such as nukes or cruise missiles are a war crime. A they are basically robotized kamikaze bombers.
Should we ban those too? Have fun winning wars that way!
Captain42x 2 years ago
imagine what would happen if your gov became corrupt. And you and your family had to fight the heads of state. Now all you have are hand held guns. the gov has remote controlled tanks, air planes and gun ships. Does that fight seem fair?
debtisslavery 3 years ago
Who cares if they're remote controlled? Even with the current military we'd all be completely fucked if the government decided to scrap the bill of rights.
balderdash707 2 years ago
The bill of rights was written by the English/Welsh/Scottish, not even Americans. It means absolutely NOTHING today, it is just thrown about,
Edeltraut3 2 years ago
What? The bill of rights refers to the first ten amendments of the American constitution (which I hope still means something), and they were written by James Madison (who was born in Virginia, which is definitely not in England, Scotland, or Wales).
I'm sure the British have one or more documents they call a bill of rights, but that's not what most Americans think of when we use the term.
balderdash707 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hey middlegay! Do you have a big nose?
Are you really ugly? Do you smell like allah?
Does every race in the world hate you?
Do you suffer from social problems? If this is true, bend over and suck your dick. If no suck a rag heads dick for being lower than a jew.
XxJTayxX 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you guys are bitches and scared to fucking fight MAN to man..pussys
middleastin 3 years ago
this is saving lives, lets say that your brother went off to war and instead of sending him on a mission they send a robot and the robot gets shot to hell it essentially saved your brothers life, id rather lose a robot than a person
silentja2 3 years ago
think of the people at the other end of that robot dont they have family's. Dont they have mothers,sisters,brothers and fathers. Dont only think of yourselves.
middleastin 3 years ago 2
are you a soldier? if you saw some action im sure you would rather have this thing getting shot up than you. dont try to get all macho i can barely type im shaking so hard
mikinike66 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is bad, just think some people NEED to fight; for instance the jewish resistance vs Germany in ww2
then some guy many many miles away not risking their life AT ALL! can kill so many courageous, righteous fighters for freedom.
unmanned weapons MUST! be a war crime!!
every1 please be mad at this technology NOW! or in the future it will be like Terminator, where the war robots control everything!
FriedCoD 3 years ago
fuck u
Cheesethemegamaster 3 years ago
shut up, this is saving lives
smartstuff2buy 3 years ago
oh yeah, because they totally had robots during the Holocaust
winchester98 3 years ago
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT!
IDIOTS!!
adrastea99 3 years ago
ロボット兵器とは！！あまりにも恐ろしく非情だ！！
戦争大反対！ロボット軍事化大反対！！
perfect0924 3 years ago
So beautiful robot!!! I love it!
PREDAGOATOR 3 years ago
lol! i can take that crap down without even using a weapon!
mananess 3 years ago
but if it notice you you will be redused in a small human meatball
darhwolf12 3 years ago
Mmm. How can we kill other people without risking our own lives? If your asking this question, you should be dead.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
So what question should we ask? How can I kill somebody at great personal risk to myself...if you're asking that question you will be dead. Fucking retard
rapiddominace 3 years ago
Maby when the war is over they will start selling them on the civilian market. Move over Rover, robot taking over! At least witht he robot, you won't have to clean up poop.
Jason607 4 years ago
No it is a intelligent robot , it kill only bad people. Probably he will kill us all.
feejo 4 years ago 5
they showed this on the military channel, it only has limited AI, it is actually controlled by soldiers with lap-tops
rapiddominace 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck the peaple american fuck bush fuck marinze fuck amirican fuck israil vive ben ladin vive alqaida vive taliban vive muslim
kamellam1 4 years ago
Go live in a sand hut in a desert you anti civilization fuck!
Y2Krashman 4 years ago 12
FUck you
xfuturemarine3 4 years ago 7
pillock.
toxikcheez 3 years ago
Terminator 0.1^^
Psychlas 4 years ago 6
i wanna see the gun shoot
razorface255 4 years ago 2
look for this video called Discovery Civilisation - Future Weapons - Trailer or watch?v=WAsdGTskn_Y
sargon08 4 years ago 4
they showed it on futur weapons the can shoot any gun and have pretty much no recoil. the put a metal storm on it , a 50 cal sniper and it has like no recoil thats crazy.
VBH8888 4 years ago
perfect
kisceto 4 years ago
everybody down hes crying a gun!!!!!ahhh!!!we'll be kiled by robots!!ahh!!!!!XD lol
henrynaruto8 4 years ago
That's old stuff, I saw it on news long time ago.
pchackal 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no war
no israel
no usa
Hamravat21 4 years ago
no muslims or liberals...
Alphawolfgang 4 years ago
hahaha
tacopimp198520 4 years ago
no idiots!
vote conservative! vote constitution!
vote Ron Paul!
krizla4 4 years ago
awesomme! i want one of 'em.
ImyTUBY 4 years ago
for ur neighbors dog? :P
sdeevooo 4 years ago
ok?
Zwinky900 4 years ago
Where is gundam??
tarasu2 4 years ago 2
not for my robot wife
maru418 4 years ago
looks a lot nicer than it did in the Discovery Channel video. i want to see these fight each other like on battle bots.
dontTouchMyFknRadio 4 years ago
Sweet!
robotica5 4 years ago
Bitchin'!!!
nikolai082700 4 years ago
cool
2wheel16 4 years ago 2
Deploy it to the Berkley campus immediately.
JayAreDubya 4 years ago 3
I think you mean Deploy it to the Hillary(Zharina) Campaign house.
wigglesdabum 4 years ago
Terminator - alpha 0.
Computerhope 4 years ago
We are so fucked...
bossdoggy 4 years ago
I don't know who you are.
But jihadists are fucked, that's for sure.
This military toy kicks ass !
VonStierlitz 4 years ago 3
Dude, this thing is manually operated, you've been watching too many movies
rapiddominace 3 years ago
No, you wanker. The question we should be asking ourselves, fuckhead, is what right do we have to kill people?
mattymofo69 3 years ago
Well, during a war we have to kill people. It's been the same way for at least 5,000 years. Did something change to wear that doesn't apply anymore? Or are you just naive and unrealistic about things?
rapiddominace 3 years ago
So the fact that it's been going on for 5000 years makes it okay not to change? Unrealistic? Unrealistic is expecting a country's people to act in a civil manner, whilst the constitution allows them to carry deadly weapons. Explain to me how it is any less uncivilised to be killed at war, than killed by a serial killer? You're killed, family will suffer equally. Nobody has the right to kill, and nobody has the right to support killing. Arguing with you is no different to arguing with a killer.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
Naive -
2 a: deficient in worldly wisdom or informed judgment
Credulous -
1 : ready to believe especially on slight or uncertain evidence
rapiddominace 3 years ago 2
Nicely translated. Seeing as you have your dictionary open, why don't you look up the word "sheep". While your at it, look up the word "blind", and the word "bigot", and maybe the phrase: "self righteous". You haven't written anything to support the notion of justifiable murder... Can you give me any reason a country should go to war with another, that outweighs the value of human life? Careful now, "we're American, and that makes us right in God's eyes" doesn't count. Nor does money.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
here's one you can look up, it describes you pretty well -
QUIVERING FAGGOT
rapiddominace 3 years ago 2
Well, I guess you win then. Good job. Funny how morons jump on the pro war band wagon wearing a "reckless" facade, when they have never had to face even the remote possibility of a threat against their lives. I'm sure if you had a mouthful of M16, you'd probably change your tune pretty quick. When civilians act like war is cool, you can tell they watch way too much tv, which is funny, because you were accusing someone else of watching too much. Don't act smart if you got fuck all to back it up.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
where did I say I was on the pro war bandwagon? I have certainly pointed out that I am on the America ought to have the best shit to fight wars with bandwagon, and if anybody thinks we ought not be the dominant military power on earth, they are naive and furthermore, fuck them.
rapiddominace 3 years ago
Oh, by the way dipshit, I'm a veteran, 4th chemical company, 2ID.
These things save the lives of our soldiers, they will save the lives of my buddies who are still in. If you aren't down with that, go fuck yourself.
rapiddominace 3 years ago
I don't understand the American mentality. Why they think that they are the chosen ones, and the rest of the world is evil. You really think the people running your military are any less corrupt than the people they are attacking? You think every war your country engages in, they are the ones with the clear conscience? You think your country is out to save inncoent lives, even when they are out there taking them? Your a fucking idiot.Your the naive one. Stop throwing that word around fuckhead.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
1. Sucks to be you, you had better understand our mentality, we are the hegemon
2. We don't think the rest of the world is evil, just the people that want to kill us
3. Our military is the least corrupt in the world, that's why it is so damn good at what it does.
3. Our country takes more precautions to prevent collateral damage than any nation in the history of the earth.
You're a fucking idiot, and everything I just said is indesputeable fact.
rapiddominace 3 years ago 2
woops said 3 twice...
rapiddominace 3 years ago
woops, spelled indispuable wrong too, wish youtube had an edit feature
rapiddominace 3 years ago
People that want to kill you because you want to kill them? I'd feel defensive if USA wanted to see everyone who spoke with an Aussie accent dead, like they do people who wear towels on their heads. I'd relish the chance to see an American hypocrite getting castrated. Your military is least corrupt, thats why they are good? How do those two things relate? You've given me an opinion without offering any facts to support it. By the standards of anyone with half a brain, that makes you an idiot.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
1. whats the difference?
2. who says we don't...seen that crocodile dundee dude lately?
3. Then you are a sick fucking pervert.
4. Bullshit, everything I stated in the last post was fact.
5. You call me an idiot and then feel you have to defend yourself to me. That's purely fucking idiotic.
rapiddominace 3 years ago
"You're"
sonofpfunk 3 years ago
yeah, didn't want to use my character limit up on apostrophes.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
-.- americans land of the free home of the brave. we dont think the rest of the world is evil either. we give billions of dollars in helping other countrys....
nolmp 3 years ago
civil manor???? the iraqies attacked and bombed us in our homeland...!!!!!!
nolmp 3 years ago
wow. You've completely de-railed my entire argument! Well done. You know what... No, no, Matty, don't do it... Stupid people have a right to an opinion too. Unfortunately thats how George Bush got elected in the first place though. Maybe stupid people shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion unless they can prove that they spend at lease one minute of their day THINKING, and not always ACTING BEFORE THEY DO.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
wow your talking to yourself amazing... wait a second your speaking american looks like you took the time to learn it. which means your probably just a wanna be terrorist
nolmp 3 years ago
Holy shit, I never realised that the English language was invented in America. Here I was thinking that it was invented in England... My bad.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
you do know englands also fighting right...?
nolmp 3 years ago
Englands people are against their countries involvement in iraq. Australias (my country) people are against its countries involvement in iraq. America was a country founded on war, and its people are desensitised to death, so much that they only take it seriously when the threat is against them. BTW, England pulled out, and so is my country now. America is now the laughing stock of the world. Eat shit.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
americas the laughing stock of the world? dont you mean a superpower of the world. australia is a great country dont get me wrong but it was started by people who went to jail. look it up. america was started by people who didnt want to be under the crule rule of the king.
nolmp 3 years ago
You contradict yourself with every comment. If America is superpower, why do they need our help? Yeah, our country was founded by convicts, but back then, they were punished for stealing bread to feed their starving families. Your country was founded by people who didn't want to be ruled by a king, now your whole country thinks they can act as king over the rest of the world. Shit is supposed to come out of your ass, not your mouth.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
yeah well i dont understand your reasoning. i never said america needed any help.also guess what? stealing bread why would they do that. because they couldnt feed there familys ok ok. but they were to lazy to get a job. they stole instead of worked.they also had murderers there also
nolmp 3 years ago
Um, idiot, English murderers in the 1700s were given the death sentence. Um, idiot, in the 1700's in England, people with jobs were still homeless. Um, idiot, whether or not you say USA needs help doesn't determine whether or not they need help, unless you're the president. Might be time for you to go to bed now, I think I hear your mum calling.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
stuff it hippie. an england is till in iraq
Dogmeat7 3 years ago
Oh, shit... Im sooooorrryyy! For those of you who need special help to understand things better, England has announced it's withdrawal from the war, as have Australia. They are still there, but whatever. What am I stuffing? I'm not really familiar with your lingo. Maybe if you said "go fuck yourself" I'd know what you were on about. Ooh, I wanna sound hard, whilst being careful about my language, just so my church friends don't think I'm bad. I won't swear, but I will support war. Goodo.
mattymofo69 3 years ago
every1 outside america hates america because ur culture is soo messed up. u guys dont give a shit about the rest of the world u dont even no whats going on in the world. ur contry is soo fucked up u go to war because u want sum oil.
rupertseale 3 years ago
think before you speak you arrogant self absorbed terrorist. America is one of the only countries thats helps other countries in need.
nolmp 3 years ago
nop. you go on countries and actually kill the innocent and the harmless. and you dont go to any war if it is not money on it. remember the kurdos, they were slained like rats, but you did nothing.
you are scum, americans, you will someday fall.
zranzran 3 years ago
America spends far more on foreign aid than any other nation on earth. Not even close.
hxly2 3 years ago
iraq was not involved in 9/11, there were no iraqi terrorists on the planes, and iraq has no link with al qaeda.
bobzilla211 3 years ago