I was there when this happened i lived 1 block from where the plane impacted the crash woke me out my sleep i thought we were being bombed terrible day 2001 was a bad year
I find it extremely ironic that not only does American hold the dubious distinction of being the center of the two deadliest aviation disasters in the U.S. (AA 191 & AA 597), but BOTH crashes were also the result of grossly improper training, given by AA. The 1977 DC-10 disaster at Chicago-O'Hare was because AA trained their maintenance workers to change engines using construction lifts, and this crash was due to AA directing their pilots to incorrectly use rudder inputs during wake turbulence.
I really hate it when these shows which are based on actual accounts and accuracy, do really novice and tacky things, such as showing Boeing 737s and 777s when they're talking about Airbus A300s. Sorry, just irks me. Anyway, I remember when this tragedy happened. We were all hoping it didn't have anything to do with 9/11. Such a terrible tragedy and to think, improper rudder movements was the likely cause of this accident.
@Neno8403 Airbus says American Airlines' training programme contributed to the crash by teaching pilots to use the rudder. Airbus demonstrated in a simulator how wing controls alone can handle wake turbulence, and says that in these circumstances the rudder should never be used.
The airline counters that their pilots were safely trained and that there is evidence Airbus failed to inform them about potential dangers with the rudder design, evidence available from earlier incidents.
You might(and probably should) have a different outlook after watching that.
Also, are you aware of the recent airbus recall due to cracks in the wings? Sounds rather familiar. Next thing you know, airbus will say using the ailerons is unsafe.... "...the wings are cracked because the pilots are using unsafe maneuvers involving the ailerons in flight...", or some bullshit like that.
@The4LA2Baker0 Those cracks are not on important parts and they are applying fix to them. Most of new aircrafts have had some kind of minor problem after releasing which was fixed. Any planes rudder will break if you keep constantly putting it to fully left and right, it creates lots of G forces. Its not Airbus fault that AA trained their pilots wrongly.
@The4LA2Baker0 And lets not forget problems of Boeing. Cargo door problem with 747 which blew big hole to 747, killed many pax and almost crashed the plane. 737 rudder design failure which was found and fixed after two Boeing 737s crashed. 777 fuel system problem with brought down BA 777.
@Pvjinflight You didn't watch it.... (watch?v=uvL433I2bl4). It IS airbus' fault. They never bothered to tell anyone about previous problems with the ultimate load being breached, and the control variance from taxi and flight. If the wings aren't important, why did they ground the whole fleet? Clearly having cracks in the wings is hazardous.
Also, I'm not picking on Airbus, I'm well aware of Boing flaws as well, but currently Airbus is the subject of scrutiny.
@The4LA2Baker0 And yeah I had no time to watch it, having test week now. Will probably watch it in few days. Anyway my point is that no matter whose fault it was at least there is still no fault with design of A300 rudder system. On modern Airbus planes I think that there is system which prevents rudder from being used too aggressively.
And although A380 cracks are not on vital parts, of course that design too is still being fixed as ofc cracks are still not good thing.
@RickMakesGoodVideos This is true. For many years after these two accidents I refused to fly AA. But one day I ended up on the airline because it was the only one that fit into my schedule. I enjoyed the flight so much that it's one of the few airlines I fly. And i'm terrified of flying.
i'm not sure that there is a more depressing or better word horrifying way to die than this. sitting in the seat and knowing (of course if you can comprehend that time) there's nothing you can to to escape from that. i know pilot errors are more common than structural faliures, yet the latter is scarier to me. Being in something uncontrollable.. I feel so sorry for everyone who perished in air disasters
I lost my grandparents 10 years ago each year I miss them more and more and this day is difficult for many people this is why should value every moment we have with are family they meant so much to me rip grandma and grandpa ubencia algarroba and hipolito algarroba may prayers go out to all the victims and families
these investigations are uploadced to share what happens - and not to lay blame on anyone's doorsteps but to make flying safer; so we can fly safer aGod bless their efforts and remember the ppl who died to make our flights safer Air crash investigations is an amazi9ng tool for us all to learn let's keep our comments polite and remember the lost souls.........
@PSNSCORPO8972 if you knew what donk meant you'd probably be smart enough to respond properly. Also this crash here is not airbus's fault. It was a co-pilot who had received bad training ripping his own plane to pieces. That's typical of american airlines training however documented in history. Why are you even arguing this so passionately do you work at the boeing plant or something?
@PSNSCORPO8972 why are you trying to fight with made up facts so much? Airbus is a newer company of course its has had newer models crash donk. Your arguments are mute and u sir are a donk as I said before.
right,every plane can crash,thats a fact.but the airbus crashes and incidents are a BIG cause for concern.
in Australia we had a very bad incident with an A330 where the plane went into a dive.Qantas later found out that the autopilot software had a BUG! and required to be upgraded. and the simple fact that all pilot inputs are going though a computer first(fly-by-wire) is scary.a computer doesn't know that there are 300+ people on board,it just does what it is programmed to do.
@PSNSCORPO8972 if you look at history percentage of crashes, more crashes % wise are caused by pilot error doing the wrong thing. The airbus may have had a few mishaps and a say a few because literally its a few. Most of boeings accidents are from improper maintenance, poor design, and pilot error. I'm proud that my dad flies airbus A320 and A310 and I know that he's safer in the air from making a personal mistake and I also know he's safer because of the brand he flies.
not necessarily,airbus,as you know,are computerized aircraft.so much of the normal pilot procedure and control is now automated that pilots over time are forgetting how to fly the plane manually. air france flight 447 is a good example,while the pitot tubes were clogging,and the computer spat out hundreds or confusing messages,the pilots let the plane stall,and they could not get out of it until it was too late.if it aint boeing,im not going
not necessarily,airbus,as you know,are computerized aircraft.so much of the normal pilot procedure and control is now automated that pilots over time are forgetting how to fly the plane manually. air france flight 447 is a good example,while the pitot tubes were clogging,and the computer spat out hundreds or confusing messages,the pilots let the plane stall,and they could not get out of it until it was too late.if it aint boeing,im not going
@PSNSCORPO8972 Please take an English class. Your sentence structure, use of punctuation and improper use of capital letters is simply atrocious. That's what I would expect from 'trailer trash.'
shut the fuck up you total retard. what the fuck have the nations of origin got to do with plane safety? american planes have crashed more than european planes by far.
Poor Pete Hayden looks like such a nice guy that he cant help but look like he's smiling while describing burnt bodies along the streets. RIP to all these ppl!
Why is it that all the most reliable, most advanced planes with impeccable safety records always crash? They always say that in just about every episode.
all i can say is "composite" now boeing is going to start using it too on the tail. combo of composite, too close to a 747 and pilot decision of full throttle
i don't understand why they keep saying in every episode that "one of the most sophisticated / relieable aircraft". they basically covered most of the common airliners by now. or they're exluding ILs, tupolevs and other eastern crafts? ehh
I flew to London and to Rome on a Concorde seven days after that crash. You should have seen my children's faces before take-off. They were shaking with fear but I guess it was because of the speed. It felt like your ear drums were being hammered (Because we were sitting near the engines).
@MrBenjamin223 ...and just today, a First Air Boeing 737 crashed in Canada and you say "of course, its an Airbus ". The intelligence of your post is mind boggling.
Some of the flight deck guys can answer this one: I am wondering if 587 was put in autopilot mode after departure. If so, was the plane still on autopilot or did the flight deck crew disingage to correct the aircraft in the turbulence.
@rmachayes its not possible since its an older model of an Airbus. The autopilot is only allowed that time when the plane would be at a certain feet clear of any turbulence.
Pilots both share who would be the take off and the other the landing. in this scenario the co-pilot would be the one who handle the take-off the captain would be watching the instrument, its is a standard operating procedure for pilots.
The US government finally killed the scumbag who directed those horrific attacks on our country. Osama bin Laden is at last dead!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!
Amen, God bless the United States and the United States only, right.
? Did you know that most European people feel that Americans are the most stupid, hypocrite and dumb people on earth? That includes you, you dumb fucking American asshole!
@rodriguezagnes It's common practice these days because it was discovered that if senior pilots made a mistake when they were in control of the aircraft, junior co-pilots felt they lacked the authority to question or correct the judgments made by their more experienced superior. The senior pilot isn't likely to be inhibited from pointing out an error and will usually step in and take control if necessary.
13:34 the word that we have is that it is an American Airlines jet, American Airlines jet, American Airlines Jet, American Airlines jet.. nice suspense
and by the way, pilot's inputs should not distroy the controll surface on a speed as slow as 250KIAS. it just cant happen. and it did with airbus. and what happened? they again blamed the pilot. as usual. but what's the point of blaming the pilots when you desighn your airplane with the system that protects the plane from "human error" - "fly by wire" system. does it mean that the system doesnt work? YES! IT DOES! we - pilots, like to fly an airplane, not the computer. and it's us, who saves you
@kostyaeagle you are not a pilot. Read your comment again. A 3-year old could have spotted your ridiculous grammatical and spelling errors. DISTROY? CONTROLL? DESIGHN? US, WHO SAVES YOU? Go back to school and don't lie to people about being a pilot anymore.
the plane took off just recently. speed below flight level 10 000 feet is prohibited above 250Knots. the aircraft is desighned to fly at speeds up to 320Knots or even higher. so, in a condition of a slow airspeed we observe a situation of a tail breaking off... load factors are small at that airspeed. this can tell us a simple outcome: on a cruise flight with a speed of 320Knots with a little turbulance or change in a jetstream, we will observe the same problem... Do NOT fly airbus...
any kind of a jet liner has a protection system directly opposite to what's being explained in this movie... with gaining speed the controlls inputs stay the same, but the reaction of the plane controll blades reduces. that's the correct theory of airplane building. what airbus creates... well, no comments... Fly with Boeing, guys, you can't break those planes simply by putting too much rudder input... Co-pilot did everything right, manufacturers made a HUGE and DRAMATIC misstake.
airbus industry is really a pain in the butt. they always try to prove that they fly by whire idea is great and anything that happens to a plane is the pilot's fault. in aviation overestessing means to aply stress beyond some WELL KNOWN LIMITS! The co-pilot didn't even have a chance to know it. it's not his fault at all, a pilot can't overreact any controlls of a plane to break it apart. that's the theory of flying. and what's that idea of with high speeds the movement of rudder ped-s lessen?..
@kostyaeagle See my comment above. Remember, next time you type something, if the word/phrase has a green line under it, you a retard because you don't know your grammar. If the word has a red line under it, you are also a retard because you can't spell. You can conclude that you are retarded. And you're not a pilot.
@ranners21 thank you for your criticism about my English. I’m working on it and still have to work hard to learn it. I’m from Russia and flying here. Flying Boeing 737. A nice plane. A plane, which you can not break using your rudder inputs on such slow speeds. A plane that lets YOU fly it and not the computer. It’s always nice to know that even if there is a problem with automation, you can always do something about it. And as for you, I don’t mind you fly any plane you like. All the very best.
@KingRhaul I'm fairly impressed with this latest comment of yours as you heeded my advice and wrote 'shut the fuck UP'. I thought I would've had to remind you how to write that insult more than once. So you can give yourself a big pat on the back, after you've finished strumming your rim piece off of course.
@masm60 If the pilots has read the POH they should have known the problem with the rudder and how they should use it. But I do agree with you. It should not be possible destroying an aircraft with control input alone. And new airplanes dos have that system that prevent it today.
@Dosalt They did not fly over the designed airspeed limit. Though will say thats its my bad. Even though they had read the POH they will not have known the rudder problem. Just saw it again. At they clearly say that it was not mentioned in POH. So it was mixed fault from the airline with its training and Airbus for not mentioning the rudder problem with the airplane.
@anariaq watched the same crash investigation from another production company. they said the Airbus pilot manual warns not to reverse the rudder strongly. it is the airline's fault for not training the pilots, I believe .
"My eyes starting getting wet" what can't he say he was crying when he found his baby & mother in law.
dabois85 1 day ago
Interesting fact: Sandi Toksvig was in the plane behind
Mulholland107 1 day ago
Once again, Airbus tried and essentially succeeded in blaming a crash caused by its lousy airplane design on the pilots.
rsattahip 2 days ago
I was there when this happened i lived 1 block from where the plane impacted the crash woke me out my sleep i thought we were being bombed terrible day 2001 was a bad year
DaquanJ 3 days ago
The shot of the a330 was a 767 from the 9/11 flight 11 documentary its at 4:20
fsxdude101 5 days ago
Did the rudder break off of the A330 of Flight 447?
normanjtongmd 1 week ago
@normanjtongmd No. It was sensor malfunction followed by massive pilot error.
transdrole 1 week ago
the bridge mentioned @ 29:28 is the Marine Pkwy./Gil Hodges bridge not the Triborough
wiedep 2 weeks ago
I find it extremely ironic that not only does American hold the dubious distinction of being the center of the two deadliest aviation disasters in the U.S. (AA 191 & AA 597), but BOTH crashes were also the result of grossly improper training, given by AA. The 1977 DC-10 disaster at Chicago-O'Hare was because AA trained their maintenance workers to change engines using construction lifts, and this crash was due to AA directing their pilots to incorrectly use rudder inputs during wake turbulence.
Neno8403 1 month ago
FLY BY WIRE has been used since 1992 pilots don't fly anymore the plane does it automatically
no terrorists, but automated flight to the max.
GroceryGame1981 1 month ago
I really hate it when these shows which are based on actual accounts and accuracy, do really novice and tacky things, such as showing Boeing 737s and 777s when they're talking about Airbus A300s. Sorry, just irks me. Anyway, I remember when this tragedy happened. We were all hoping it didn't have anything to do with 9/11. Such a terrible tragedy and to think, improper rudder movements was the likely cause of this accident.
Neno8403 1 month ago
@Neno8403 Airbus says American Airlines' training programme contributed to the crash by teaching pilots to use the rudder. Airbus demonstrated in a simulator how wing controls alone can handle wake turbulence, and says that in these circumstances the rudder should never be used.
The airline counters that their pilots were safely trained and that there is evidence Airbus failed to inform them about potential dangers with the rudder design, evidence available from earlier incidents.
The4LA2Baker0 1 month ago
@The4LA2Baker0 That training programme was just faulty, rudder was never meant to be used like it was used in this accident.
Pvjinflight 2 weeks ago
@Pvjinflight watch?v=uvL433I2bl4
You might(and probably should) have a different outlook after watching that.
Also, are you aware of the recent airbus recall due to cracks in the wings? Sounds rather familiar. Next thing you know, airbus will say using the ailerons is unsafe.... "...the wings are cracked because the pilots are using unsafe maneuvers involving the ailerons in flight...", or some bullshit like that.
The4LA2Baker0 2 weeks ago
@The4LA2Baker0 Those cracks are not on important parts and they are applying fix to them. Most of new aircrafts have had some kind of minor problem after releasing which was fixed. Any planes rudder will break if you keep constantly putting it to fully left and right, it creates lots of G forces. Its not Airbus fault that AA trained their pilots wrongly.
Are you actually aircraft engineer
Pvjinflight 2 weeks ago
@The4LA2Baker0 And lets not forget problems of Boeing. Cargo door problem with 747 which blew big hole to 747, killed many pax and almost crashed the plane. 737 rudder design failure which was found and fixed after two Boeing 737s crashed. 777 fuel system problem with brought down BA 777.
Pvjinflight 2 weeks ago
@Pvjinflight You didn't watch it.... (watch?v=uvL433I2bl4). It IS airbus' fault. They never bothered to tell anyone about previous problems with the ultimate load being breached, and the control variance from taxi and flight. If the wings aren't important, why did they ground the whole fleet? Clearly having cracks in the wings is hazardous.
Also, I'm not picking on Airbus, I'm well aware of Boing flaws as well, but currently Airbus is the subject of scrutiny.
The4LA2Baker0 2 weeks ago
@The4LA2Baker0 They grounded whole fleet to check if all planes have those cracks, an´d applied temporary fix, and in future whole fix.
Also no its not hazardous if is in non supporting parts. Airbus engineers surely do know what they are doing.
Pvjinflight 2 weeks ago
@The4LA2Baker0 And yeah I had no time to watch it, having test week now. Will probably watch it in few days. Anyway my point is that no matter whose fault it was at least there is still no fault with design of A300 rudder system. On modern Airbus planes I think that there is system which prevents rudder from being used too aggressively.
And although A380 cracks are not on vital parts, of course that design too is still being fixed as ofc cracks are still not good thing.
Pvjinflight 2 weeks ago
Giuliani was such a first rate mayor.
BlackLabelSlushie 1 month ago
This is just Airbus - the tons of flying scrap
ursjan 2 months ago
Like the nuclear meltdown warning inside of the cockpit. RIP
Laudan08 2 months ago
I sure do miss seconds from disaster. Thanks for the upload
kisha1682 2 months ago 2
RIP ABF2 Rodriguez. You were a great friend, mentor, and shipmate.
toonami54 2 months ago 2
2001 was a bad year for American Airlines.
RickMakesGoodVideos 2 months ago 22
@RickMakesGoodVideos This is true. For many years after these two accidents I refused to fly AA. But one day I ended up on the airline because it was the only one that fit into my schedule. I enjoyed the flight so much that it's one of the few airlines I fly. And i'm terrified of flying.
melodramatic7904 1 week ago
@melodramatic7904
I refuse to fly AA because of the rude skyhags and terrible service, not for safety concerns.
rsattahip 2 days ago
@rsattahip That's your preference. I'm too scared of flying to put service over my own safety.
melodramatic7904 2 days ago
That rudder system is a piece of shit
PICLex 2 months ago
the plane could have crashed into aqueduct racecourse.
MikePike5 2 months ago
Such a shame.
LevelHeadOpinion 3 months ago
pray
funnyguy1ize 3 months ago
my bro was on that plane he got killed
funnyguy1ize 3 months ago
@funnyguy1ize I feel bad for you. D:> How old was he?
aarvelo 3 months ago
RIP
Senaku007 3 months ago
i'm not sure that there is a more depressing or better word horrifying way to die than this. sitting in the seat and knowing (of course if you can comprehend that time) there's nothing you can to to escape from that. i know pilot errors are more common than structural faliures, yet the latter is scarier to me. Being in something uncontrollable.. I feel so sorry for everyone who perished in air disasters
hlfLordTesco 3 months ago 2
RIP
TheLittlewing22 3 months ago
I lost my grandparents 10 years ago each year I miss them more and more and this day is difficult for many people this is why should value every moment we have with are family they meant so much to me rip grandma and grandpa ubencia algarroba and hipolito algarroba may prayers go out to all the victims and families
nesly2995 3 months ago
@nesly2995 ..... Our prayers are with you and your loved ones.
theLaNDoftheLOOPS 3 months ago
these investigations are uploadced to share what happens - and not to lay blame on anyone's doorsteps but to make flying safer; so we can fly safer aGod bless their efforts and remember the ppl who died to make our flights safer Air crash investigations is an amazi9ng tool for us all to learn let's keep our comments polite and remember the lost souls.........
Pebscorner 3 months ago 19
@PSNSCORPO8972 Hey idiot, as much as I love both Boeing and Airbus, they BOTH use fly-by-wire.
airplanegod 3 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972 if you knew what donk meant you'd probably be smart enough to respond properly. Also this crash here is not airbus's fault. It was a co-pilot who had received bad training ripping his own plane to pieces. That's typical of american airlines training however documented in history. Why are you even arguing this so passionately do you work at the boeing plant or something?
VoidOfEnigmas 4 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972 why are you trying to fight with made up facts so much? Airbus is a newer company of course its has had newer models crash donk. Your arguments are mute and u sir are a donk as I said before.
VoidOfEnigmas 4 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972
right,every plane can crash,thats a fact.but the airbus crashes and incidents are a BIG cause for concern.
in Australia we had a very bad incident with an A330 where the plane went into a dive.Qantas later found out that the autopilot software had a BUG! and required to be upgraded. and the simple fact that all pilot inputs are going though a computer first(fly-by-wire) is scary.a computer doesn't know that there are 300+ people on board,it just does what it is programmed to do.
heathirving 4 months ago
And thus the importance of crew resource management.
Chrystyanification 4 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972 if you look at history percentage of crashes, more crashes % wise are caused by pilot error doing the wrong thing. The airbus may have had a few mishaps and a say a few because literally its a few. Most of boeings accidents are from improper maintenance, poor design, and pilot error. I'm proud that my dad flies airbus A320 and A310 and I know that he's safer in the air from making a personal mistake and I also know he's safer because of the brand he flies.
VoidOfEnigmas 4 months ago
@VoidOfEnigmas
not necessarily,airbus,as you know,are computerized aircraft.so much of the normal pilot procedure and control is now automated that pilots over time are forgetting how to fly the plane manually. air france flight 447 is a good example,while the pitot tubes were clogging,and the computer spat out hundreds or confusing messages,the pilots let the plane stall,and they could not get out of it until it was too late.if it aint boeing,im not going
heathirving 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VoidOfEnigmas
not necessarily,airbus,as you know,are computerized aircraft.so much of the normal pilot procedure and control is now automated that pilots over time are forgetting how to fly the plane manually. air france flight 447 is a good example,while the pitot tubes were clogging,and the computer spat out hundreds or confusing messages,the pilots let the plane stall,and they could not get out of it until it was too late.if it aint boeing,im not going
heathirving 4 months ago
Americans always seem to think they're under attack. Cowards
R0ckstar666x 4 months ago
@R0ckstar666x Cowards? Without US the world would go to shit. We are the equalizer, and you are an idiot.
astar334 4 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972 ummmmmmmmmmmmm, the airbus is a statistically safer plane then boeing. K thnx
VoidOfEnigmas 4 months ago
this is a horribly done show here. Air Crash Investigation so much better with the american version.
VoidOfEnigmas 4 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972 You just presented yourself as the illiterate dumb ass that you are. "You really need to STEADY the Oxford Dictionary?"
EmeraldCoastGenius 4 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972 Please take an English class. Your sentence structure, use of punctuation and improper use of capital letters is simply atrocious. That's what I would expect from 'trailer trash.'
EmeraldCoastGenius 5 months ago
@PSNSCORPO8972
shut the fuck up you total retard. what the fuck have the nations of origin got to do with plane safety? american planes have crashed more than european planes by far.
gloomyoutlook 5 months ago
now i hate japanese airlines,nobody should of died
457azazazaz 5 months ago
Poor Pete Hayden looks like such a nice guy that he cant help but look like he's smiling while describing burnt bodies along the streets. RIP to all these ppl!
TEST4YOURCDL 5 months ago
Why is it that all the most reliable, most advanced planes with impeccable safety records always crash? They always say that in just about every episode.
jakfuki 5 months ago
all i can say is "composite" now boeing is going to start using it too on the tail. combo of composite, too close to a 747 and pilot decision of full throttle
84633bmrguy 5 months ago
i don't understand why they keep saying in every episode that "one of the most sophisticated / relieable aircraft". they basically covered most of the common airliners by now. or they're exluding ILs, tupolevs and other eastern crafts? ehh
hlfLordTesco 5 months ago
@hlfLordTesco
they called the MD-11 sophisticated and reliable, lol.
gloomyoutlook 5 months ago
I flew to London and to Rome on a Concorde seven days after that crash. You should have seen my children's faces before take-off. They were shaking with fear but I guess it was because of the speed. It felt like your ear drums were being hammered (Because we were sitting near the engines).
Ferrari73703 6 months ago
wake turbulance wasnt violent?? if it wasnt violent they shouldnt have shown the plane rocking around in the beginning then...
LiLTMac123 6 months ago
This was just horrific, so soon after 9/11 too. RIP to all those that died.
fuzzface100 6 months ago
They should improve airplanes system so none of this things happen. Rip for all of you...
makive3000 6 months ago
It's not even a A300-605R in the show, it's a 767-300ER...
LouisPerron777 6 months ago
The A300 is a 35 year old plane... Dont second guess the french builder. They were the first one with Fly-by-Wire airplanes.
LouisPerron777 6 months ago
Oh my gosh i am SO SHOCKED i did not fucking KNOW ABOUT THIS where was I??? it happned two months after 9/11?!? WTF?
helllajennifer 6 months ago
OF COURSE, Its an AIRBUS -_-
MrBenjamin223 6 months ago
@MrBenjamin223 Really? Did you say the same thing when Turkish 1951 (Boeing 737-800) crashed or British Airways 038 (Boeing 777-200)?
StrikkklyROCKERS 6 months ago
@StrikkklyROCKERS Really
MrBenjamin223 6 months ago
@MrBenjamin223 ...and just today, a First Air Boeing 737 crashed in Canada and you say "of course, its an Airbus ". The intelligence of your post is mind boggling.
StrikkklyROCKERS 6 months ago
@StrikkklyROCKERS But it was a pilot error, Airbus didnt tell American airlines that the rudder was sensitive.
MrBenjamin223 6 months ago
@123anstin322 probably it was simply cheaper...
psoras 7 months ago
@123anstin322 i do not know why, they have a300 simululators but they choose not to use it.
perfectpilot1 7 months ago
The Tail broke Off....
TheDylanJoyce 7 months ago
they shot the documentary in a 747-300 cockpit and a 767 american airlines a/c when it was an airbus a300.
perfectpilot1 7 months ago
sad to see innocent people die anywher in world
777Chatha 8 months ago
OMG! THATS HORRIBLE! Think of how the passengers must have felt as the plane fell while spinning out of control!!!
SAMCAMJAIK1 8 months ago
the plane went into a flat spin.
FridayNightization 8 months ago
ben je nederlands?
designbutton 8 months ago
Some of the flight deck guys can answer this one: I am wondering if 587 was put in autopilot mode after departure. If so, was the plane still on autopilot or did the flight deck crew disingage to correct the aircraft in the turbulence.
rmachayes 9 months ago
@rmachayes its not possible since its an older model of an Airbus. The autopilot is only allowed that time when the plane would be at a certain feet clear of any turbulence.
Pilots both share who would be the take off and the other the landing. in this scenario the co-pilot would be the one who handle the take-off the captain would be watching the instrument, its is a standard operating procedure for pilots.
kittymagnum 8 months ago
bad quality
tonystarification 9 months ago
yeah he's finally dead long live the Americans
tonystarification 9 months ago
yeah he's finally dead long live the americans
tonystarification 9 months ago
The US government finally killed the scumbag who directed those horrific attacks on our country. Osama bin Laden is at last dead!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!
02Ctu2486 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@02Ctu2486
Amen, God bless the United States and the United States only, right.
? Did you know that most European people feel that Americans are the most stupid, hypocrite and dumb people on earth? That includes you, you dumb fucking American asshole!
ramsamoetsingh 6 months ago
Why was co-pilot navigating the plane?
rodriguezagnes 10 months ago
@rodriguezagnes It's common practice these days because it was discovered that if senior pilots made a mistake when they were in control of the aircraft, junior co-pilots felt they lacked the authority to question or correct the judgments made by their more experienced superior. The senior pilot isn't likely to be inhibited from pointing out an error and will usually step in and take control if necessary.
mjeshaw 9 months ago
13:34 the word that we have is that it is an American Airlines jet, American Airlines jet, American Airlines Jet, American Airlines jet.. nice suspense
saeed1291 10 months ago
I wish I could witness your tiny mind's thought process when you rack your brains for a clever insult.
ranners21 10 months ago
@ranners21 oh ranners
wicked188353 10 months ago
5:11
"9:11 am", mind fuck right there
whatisitfuckface27 10 months ago 2
and by the way, pilot's inputs should not distroy the controll surface on a speed as slow as 250KIAS. it just cant happen. and it did with airbus. and what happened? they again blamed the pilot. as usual. but what's the point of blaming the pilots when you desighn your airplane with the system that protects the plane from "human error" - "fly by wire" system. does it mean that the system doesnt work? YES! IT DOES! we - pilots, like to fly an airplane, not the computer. and it's us, who saves you
kostyaeagle 11 months ago 2
@kostyaeagle you are not a pilot. Read your comment again. A 3-year old could have spotted your ridiculous grammatical and spelling errors. DISTROY? CONTROLL? DESIGHN? US, WHO SAVES YOU? Go back to school and don't lie to people about being a pilot anymore.
ranners21 11 months ago
the plane took off just recently. speed below flight level 10 000 feet is prohibited above 250Knots. the aircraft is desighned to fly at speeds up to 320Knots or even higher. so, in a condition of a slow airspeed we observe a situation of a tail breaking off... load factors are small at that airspeed. this can tell us a simple outcome: on a cruise flight with a speed of 320Knots with a little turbulance or change in a jetstream, we will observe the same problem... Do NOT fly airbus...
kostyaeagle 11 months ago
i started crying when i saw that the two families were ok :')
sonicfan1996 1 year ago
any kind of a jet liner has a protection system directly opposite to what's being explained in this movie... with gaining speed the controlls inputs stay the same, but the reaction of the plane controll blades reduces. that's the correct theory of airplane building. what airbus creates... well, no comments... Fly with Boeing, guys, you can't break those planes simply by putting too much rudder input... Co-pilot did everything right, manufacturers made a HUGE and DRAMATIC misstake.
kostyaeagle 1 year ago
airbus industry is really a pain in the butt. they always try to prove that they fly by whire idea is great and anything that happens to a plane is the pilot's fault. in aviation overestessing means to aply stress beyond some WELL KNOWN LIMITS! The co-pilot didn't even have a chance to know it. it's not his fault at all, a pilot can't overreact any controlls of a plane to break it apart. that's the theory of flying. and what's that idea of with high speeds the movement of rudder ped-s lessen?..
kostyaeagle 1 year ago
@kostyaeagle See my comment above. Remember, next time you type something, if the word/phrase has a green line under it, you a retard because you don't know your grammar. If the word has a red line under it, you are also a retard because you can't spell. You can conclude that you are retarded. And you're not a pilot.
ranners21 11 months ago
@ranners21 thank you for your criticism about my English. I’m working on it and still have to work hard to learn it. I’m from Russia and flying here. Flying Boeing 737. A nice plane. A plane, which you can not break using your rudder inputs on such slow speeds. A plane that lets YOU fly it and not the computer. It’s always nice to know that even if there is a problem with automation, you can always do something about it. And as for you, I don’t mind you fly any plane you like. All the very best.
kostyaeagle 11 months ago
@ranners21 shut the fuck you dick
KingRhaul 10 months ago
@KingRhaul Do you mean 'shut the fuck UP you dick', you dick? You are afforded this conclusion, you are a tool. Now go nosh yourself off.
ranners21 10 months ago
@ranners21 fuck outa here with your silly comeback, shut the fuck up dummy
KingRhaul 10 months ago
@KingRhaul I'm fairly impressed with this latest comment of yours as you heeded my advice and wrote 'shut the fuck UP'. I thought I would've had to remind you how to write that insult more than once. So you can give yourself a big pat on the back, after you've finished strumming your rim piece off of course.
ranners21 10 months ago
@ranners21 now shut the fuck up silly dummy
KingRhaul 10 months ago
@KingRhaul Silly Dummy??
boaterbil 9 months ago
@boaterbil ????
KingRhaul 9 months ago
@boaterbil Sry ranners21 sent to qrong poster.
boaterbil 9 months ago
@boaterbil sry king wrote to wrong poster
boaterbil 9 months ago
aaahhhhhhhhh
janinaman 1 year ago
4cm of rudder movement = rip the tail off? Doesn't sound like a great design to me.
masm60 1 year ago
@masm60 LOL
BraeDoktor 1 year ago
@masm60 If the pilots has read the POH they should have known the problem with the rudder and how they should use it. But I do agree with you. It should not be possible destroying an aircraft with control input alone. And new airplanes dos have that system that prevent it today.
anariaq 1 year ago
@anariaq a well know fact is if you fly any airliner beyond the designed speed limit, it will start to break apart.
Dosalt 1 year ago
@Dosalt They did not fly over the designed airspeed limit. Though will say thats its my bad. Even though they had read the POH they will not have known the rudder problem. Just saw it again. At they clearly say that it was not mentioned in POH. So it was mixed fault from the airline with its training and Airbus for not mentioning the rudder problem with the airplane.
anariaq 1 year ago
@anariaq watched the same crash investigation from another production company. they said the Airbus pilot manual warns not to reverse the rudder strongly. it is the airline's fault for not training the pilots, I believe .
Dosalt 1 year ago
@masm60 the makers of the plane did not for see the pilots turning left and right vary rapidly
mattstorm360 1 year ago